Kenji Kawakami, Shigeo Tanabe, Sayaka Omatsu, Daiki Kinoshita, Yoshihiro Hamaji, Ken Tomida, Hiroo Koshisaki, Kenta Fujimura, Yoshikiyo Kanada, Hiroaki Sakurai
Background: The impact of different stroke types on specific activities of daily living (ADL) is unclear.
Objective: To investigate how differences between intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and cerebral infarction (CI) affect improvement of ADL in patients with stroke within a hospital by focusing on the sub-items of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM).
Methods: Patients with first-stroke hemiplegia (n = 212) were divided into two groups: ICH (86 patients) and CI (126 patients). Primary assessments included 13 motor and 5 cognitive sub-items of the FIM assessed at admission and discharge. Between-group comparisons and multiple regression analyses were performed.
Results: Upon admission, the ICH group exhibited significantly lower FIM scores than those of the CI group across various activities, including grooming, dressing (upper body and lower body), toileting, bed/chair transfer, toilet transfer, walking/wheelchair, and stairs. Age and FIM motor scores at admission influenced both groups' total FIM motor scores at discharge, whereas the duration from onset affected only the CI group.
Conclusion: Several individual FIM motor items were more adversely affected by ICH than by CI. Factors related to ADL at discharge may differ depending on stroke type. Recognizing these differences is vital for efficient rehabilitation practices and outcome prediction.
背景:不同类型的中风对特定日常生活活动(ADL)的影响尚不清楚:不同类型的中风对特定日常生活活动(ADL)的影响尚不清楚:方法:将首次中风偏瘫患者(n = 212)分为两组,一组为脑出血患者,另一组为脑梗塞患者:方法:将首次中风偏瘫患者(n = 212)分为两组:ICH组(86例)和CI组(126例)。主要评估包括入院和出院时评估的 FIM 的 13 个运动和 5 个认知分项。进行了组间比较和多元回归分析:入院时,ICH 组患者在梳洗、穿衣(上半身和下半身)、如厕、床/椅转移、厕所转移、行走/轮椅和爬楼梯等各种活动中的 FIM 评分均明显低于 CI 组患者。入院时的年龄和 FIM 运动评分会影响两组患者出院时的 FIM 运动总评分,而发病持续时间只影响 CI 组:结论:与 CI 相比,ICH 对多个 FIM 运动项目的不利影响更大。与出院时日常活动能力相关的因素可能因中风类型而异。认识到这些差异对于有效的康复实践和结果预测至关重要。
{"title":"Impact of intracerebral hemorrhage and cerebral infarction on ADL and outcome in stroke patients: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Kenji Kawakami, Shigeo Tanabe, Sayaka Omatsu, Daiki Kinoshita, Yoshihiro Hamaji, Ken Tomida, Hiroo Koshisaki, Kenta Fujimura, Yoshikiyo Kanada, Hiroaki Sakurai","doi":"10.3233/NRE-240182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-240182","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of different stroke types on specific activities of daily living (ADL) is unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate how differences between intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and cerebral infarction (CI) affect improvement of ADL in patients with stroke within a hospital by focusing on the sub-items of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with first-stroke hemiplegia (n = 212) were divided into two groups: ICH (86 patients) and CI (126 patients). Primary assessments included 13 motor and 5 cognitive sub-items of the FIM assessed at admission and discharge. Between-group comparisons and multiple regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Upon admission, the ICH group exhibited significantly lower FIM scores than those of the CI group across various activities, including grooming, dressing (upper body and lower body), toileting, bed/chair transfer, toilet transfer, walking/wheelchair, and stairs. Age and FIM motor scores at admission influenced both groups' total FIM motor scores at discharge, whereas the duration from onset affected only the CI group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several individual FIM motor items were more adversely affected by ICH than by CI. Factors related to ADL at discharge may differ depending on stroke type. Recognizing these differences is vital for efficient rehabilitation practices and outcome prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"55 1","pages":"41-49"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142110543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lucia Willadino Braga, Sandro Barbosa Oliveira, Lígia Maria do Nascimento Souza
Background: It is important to investigate satisfaction and perception of the effectiveness of telerehabilitation and its outcomes post-COVID-19 pandemic.
Objective: Evaluate the patients' and healthcare providers' level of satisfaction with telerehabilitation and perception of its efficacy and describe how it became an established resource in a network of rehabilitation hospitals post-pandemic.
Methods: The online survey about their experience with telerehabilitation was completed by 2,755 patients (322 new patients and 2,433 existing patients), and 668 providers from 26 different specialties.
Results: Most patients and providers rated remote care as effective. There were no differences in scores between existing patients and new patients and the majority reported that their expectations were met. Most patients described their remote consults as good as or better than in-person, while providers mostly preferred in-person sessions. Despite most modalities having returned to in-person practice, there is still a significant percentage of telerehabilitation consults.
Conclusion: Three years after the start of the pandemic, despite a return to in-person treatment, we see a telerehabilitation culture being constructed as a resource to supplement the rehabilitation process, with potential for establishing this model in a network of rehabilitation hospitals.
{"title":"Telerehabilitation from the perspective of patients and healthcare providers: A 3-year follow-up study.","authors":"Lucia Willadino Braga, Sandro Barbosa Oliveira, Lígia Maria do Nascimento Souza","doi":"10.3233/NRE-230385","DOIUrl":"10.3233/NRE-230385","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is important to investigate satisfaction and perception of the effectiveness of telerehabilitation and its outcomes post-COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the patients' and healthcare providers' level of satisfaction with telerehabilitation and perception of its efficacy and describe how it became an established resource in a network of rehabilitation hospitals post-pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The online survey about their experience with telerehabilitation was completed by 2,755 patients (322 new patients and 2,433 existing patients), and 668 providers from 26 different specialties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients and providers rated remote care as effective. There were no differences in scores between existing patients and new patients and the majority reported that their expectations were met. Most patients described their remote consults as good as or better than in-person, while providers mostly preferred in-person sessions. Despite most modalities having returned to in-person practice, there is still a significant percentage of telerehabilitation consults.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Three years after the start of the pandemic, despite a return to in-person treatment, we see a telerehabilitation culture being constructed as a resource to supplement the rehabilitation process, with potential for establishing this model in a network of rehabilitation hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"55 1","pages":"103-115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380237/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142110545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Márcia Gonçalves E Silva Targino da Costa, Péricles de Andrade Maranhão-Filho, Izabella Costa Santos, Ronir Raggio Luiz
Background: Facial nerve dysfunction can be a devastating trouble for post-parotidectomy patients.
Objective: To assess rehabilitation outcomes concerning patients with post-parotidectomy facial nerve dysfunction, comparing benign versus malignant neoplasms.
Methods: Prospective study enrolling adults who underwent parotidectomy with facial nerve sparing between 2016 and 2020. The Modified Sunnybrook System (mS-FGS) was used for facial assessments. Physiotherapy began on the first post-operative day with a tailored program of facial exercises based on Neuromuscular Retraining, to be performed at home 3 times/day. From the first outpatient consultation, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation was added to the treatment of cases with moderate or severe facial dysfunctions.
Results: Benign and malignant groups had a statistically significant improvement in mS-FGS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). There was no significant difference between groups regarding treatment duration or number of physiotherapy sessions performed. The history of previous parotidectomy resulted in more severe initial dysfunctions and worse outcome. Age over 60 years and initially more severe dysfunctions impacted the outcome.
Conclusion: Patients with benign and malignant parotid neoplasms had significant and equivalent improvement in postoperative facial dysfunction following an early tailored physiotherapy program, with no significant difference in the final facial score, treatment duration, or number of sessions required.
背景:面神经功能障碍可能会给腮腺切除术后的患者带来毁灭性的麻烦:评估腮腺切除术后面神经功能障碍患者的康复效果,比较良性肿瘤与恶性肿瘤:前瞻性研究纳入了2016年至2020年间接受腮腺切除术并保留面神经的成年人。采用改良桑尼布鲁克系统(mS-FGS)进行面部评估。物理治疗从术后第一天开始,根据神经肌肉再训练法定制面部锻炼计划,每天在家进行3次。从第一次门诊开始,在治疗中度或重度面部功能障碍的病例时,增加了感觉神经肌肉促进疗法:结果:良性组和恶性组的 mS-FGS 均有显著改善(分别为 p < 0.001 和 p = 0.005)。各组在治疗时间和物理治疗次数上无明显差异。曾进行过腮腺切除术的患者初始功能障碍更严重,疗效更差。结论:良性和恶性腮腺切除术患者的年龄超过60岁,最初的功能障碍更严重,会影响治疗效果:结论:良性和恶性腮腺肿瘤患者在接受早期量身定制的物理治疗计划后,术后面部功能障碍得到了显著改善,且改善程度相当,但最终面部评分、治疗时间或所需治疗次数没有显著差异。
{"title":"Post-parotidectomy facial nerve rehabilitation outcomes: Comparison between benign and malignant neoplasms.","authors":"Márcia Gonçalves E Silva Targino da Costa, Péricles de Andrade Maranhão-Filho, Izabella Costa Santos, Ronir Raggio Luiz","doi":"10.3233/NRE-230220","DOIUrl":"10.3233/NRE-230220","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Facial nerve dysfunction can be a devastating trouble for post-parotidectomy patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess rehabilitation outcomes concerning patients with post-parotidectomy facial nerve dysfunction, comparing benign versus malignant neoplasms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective study enrolling adults who underwent parotidectomy with facial nerve sparing between 2016 and 2020. The Modified Sunnybrook System (mS-FGS) was used for facial assessments. Physiotherapy began on the first post-operative day with a tailored program of facial exercises based on Neuromuscular Retraining, to be performed at home 3 times/day. From the first outpatient consultation, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation was added to the treatment of cases with moderate or severe facial dysfunctions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Benign and malignant groups had a statistically significant improvement in mS-FGS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). There was no significant difference between groups regarding treatment duration or number of physiotherapy sessions performed. The history of previous parotidectomy resulted in more severe initial dysfunctions and worse outcome. Age over 60 years and initially more severe dysfunctions impacted the outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with benign and malignant parotid neoplasms had significant and equivalent improvement in postoperative facial dysfunction following an early tailored physiotherapy program, with no significant difference in the final facial score, treatment duration, or number of sessions required.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"259-273"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139672340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Pediatric cervical spine injuries (CSIs) from blunt trauma carry a high risk of neurological damage. Accurate diagnosis is vital for preventing harm and aiding recovery, yet the diagnostic accuracy of clinical decision rules (CDRs) remains unclear.
Objective: To assess the effectiveness of triage tools for detecting CSI in pediatric trauma patients.
Methods: A summary of the Cochrane Review by Tavender et al. (2024), with comments from a rehabilitation perspective.
Results: Five studies with 21,379 participants assessed seven CDRs. Direct comparisons showed high sensitivity but low specificity across different CDRs. Indirect comparison studies also demonstrated varying sensitivities and specificities.
Conclusions: Insufficient evidence exists to determine the best tools for deciding if imaging is necessary for diagnosing potential CSI in children. Better quality studies are needed to assess the accuracy of CDRs for cervical spine clearance in this population.
{"title":"Are triage tools effective for detecting cervical spine injury in paediatric trauma patients? - A Cochrane Review summary with commentary.","authors":"Nalan Capan","doi":"10.3233/NRE-246005","DOIUrl":"10.3233/NRE-246005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric cervical spine injuries (CSIs) from blunt trauma carry a high risk of neurological damage. Accurate diagnosis is vital for preventing harm and aiding recovery, yet the diagnostic accuracy of clinical decision rules (CDRs) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of triage tools for detecting CSI in pediatric trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A summary of the Cochrane Review by Tavender et al. (2024), with comments from a rehabilitation perspective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies with 21,379 participants assessed seven CDRs. Direct comparisons showed high sensitivity but low specificity across different CDRs. Indirect comparison studies also demonstrated varying sensitivities and specificities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Insufficient evidence exists to determine the best tools for deciding if imaging is necessary for diagnosing potential CSI in children. Better quality studies are needed to assess the accuracy of CDRs for cervical spine clearance in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"55 1","pages":"147-149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142110538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla, Diego Rivera, Miriam J Rodriguez, Bryan R Christ, Oswaldo Moreno, Daniela Ramos Usuga, Laiene Olabarrieta-Landa, Paul B Perrin, Carmen I Carrión, Gloria M Morel Valdés, Denise Krch, Ariana Amaya, Christin I Drago, Patricia García, Patricia M Rivera
Background: Hispanics are a significant demographic in the U.S., with diverse cultures and languages. Assessing cognition in this group is complex as cultural and linguistic factors have been found to affect test performance.
Objective: To generate normative data on the World Health Organization-University of California Los Angeles Auditory Verbal Learning Test (WHO-UCLA AVLT) in a sample of Spanish-speaking Hispanics residing in the U.S.
Methods: The sample included 245 Spanish-speaking individuals aged 18-80 across the U.S. (California, Connecticut, Florida, Indiana, New Jersey, Oregon, Virginia, and Wisconsin). Participants were administered the WHO-UCLA AVLT as part of a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. A Bayesian regression approach was used to estimate normative data, including covariates found to be important for predicting performances on measures of learning and memory.
Results: Bayesian models showed a logarithmic link between education and all WHO-UCLA AVLT trials, except recognition. For delayed recall, increased Spanish proficiency benefited women's performance exclusively. Time in the U.S. was a significant predictor for total recall, indicating worse performance with longer residency.
Conclusion: Recognizing cultural factors like language proficiency and duration of U.S. residence is essential for accurately evaluating cognitive function among Spanish-speaking Hispanics. This research emphasizes the importance of accounting for cultural nuances in developing norms for neuropsychological assessments, thereby improving their relevance and effectiveness in diverse communities.
{"title":"WHO-UCLA auditory verbal learning test: Normative data for Spanish-speaking adults in the United States.","authors":"Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla, Diego Rivera, Miriam J Rodriguez, Bryan R Christ, Oswaldo Moreno, Daniela Ramos Usuga, Laiene Olabarrieta-Landa, Paul B Perrin, Carmen I Carrión, Gloria M Morel Valdés, Denise Krch, Ariana Amaya, Christin I Drago, Patricia García, Patricia M Rivera","doi":"10.3233/NRE-240090","DOIUrl":"10.3233/NRE-240090","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hispanics are a significant demographic in the U.S., with diverse cultures and languages. Assessing cognition in this group is complex as cultural and linguistic factors have been found to affect test performance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To generate normative data on the World Health Organization-University of California Los Angeles Auditory Verbal Learning Test (WHO-UCLA AVLT) in a sample of Spanish-speaking Hispanics residing in the U.S.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample included 245 Spanish-speaking individuals aged 18-80 across the U.S. (California, Connecticut, Florida, Indiana, New Jersey, Oregon, Virginia, and Wisconsin). Participants were administered the WHO-UCLA AVLT as part of a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. A Bayesian regression approach was used to estimate normative data, including covariates found to be important for predicting performances on measures of learning and memory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bayesian models showed a logarithmic link between education and all WHO-UCLA AVLT trials, except recognition. For delayed recall, increased Spanish proficiency benefited women's performance exclusively. Time in the U.S. was a significant predictor for total recall, indicating worse performance with longer residency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recognizing cultural factors like language proficiency and duration of U.S. residence is essential for accurately evaluating cognitive function among Spanish-speaking Hispanics. This research emphasizes the importance of accounting for cultural nuances in developing norms for neuropsychological assessments, thereby improving their relevance and effectiveness in diverse communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"183-193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142292875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Carmen I Carrión, Diego Rivera, Anabel Forte, Laiene Olabarrieta-Landa, Oswaldo Moreno, Daniela Ramos Usuga, Gloria M Morel Valdés, Melisa López, Miriam J Rodriguez, Anthony H Lequerica, Christin I Drago, Patricia García, Patricia M Rivera, Paul B Perrin, Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla
Background: Hispanics/Latinos are the largest racial/ethnic group among underrepresented populations in the U.S. and multiple sociodemographic, cultural, and linguistic factors have been found to impact their performances on cognitive testing. Despite this, few normative data are available for the heterogeneous Spanish-speaking population in the U.S.
Objective: To generate normative data on the Trail-Making Test (TMT), Bells Test, Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), and the Brief Test of Attention (BTA) for Spanish speakers residing in the U.S.
Methods: The sample included 245 Spanish-speaking individuals aged 18- 80 from eight states across the U.S. (California, Connecticut, Florida, Indiana, New Jersey, Oregon, Virginia, and Wisconsin). Participants were administered attention and processing speed measures as part of a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. We used a Bayesian regression approach to estimate normative data, including covariates found to be important for predicting performances on measures of attention and processing speed.
Results: Sociodemographic factors including education, time in the U.S., acculturation, age, and/or sex had differential effects on the TMT-A, TMT-B, SDMT, and the BTA whereas the Bells Test was not influenced by any of these sociodemographic factors.
Conclusion: Our findings indicate that while sex, age, and educational attainment are important factors to consider, language and acculturation can also influence attention and processing speed performances among Spanish speakers in the U.S.
{"title":"Attention and processing speed tests: Normative data for Spanish-speaking adults in the United States.","authors":"Carmen I Carrión, Diego Rivera, Anabel Forte, Laiene Olabarrieta-Landa, Oswaldo Moreno, Daniela Ramos Usuga, Gloria M Morel Valdés, Melisa López, Miriam J Rodriguez, Anthony H Lequerica, Christin I Drago, Patricia García, Patricia M Rivera, Paul B Perrin, Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla","doi":"10.3233/NRE-240086","DOIUrl":"10.3233/NRE-240086","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hispanics/Latinos are the largest racial/ethnic group among underrepresented populations in the U.S. and multiple sociodemographic, cultural, and linguistic factors have been found to impact their performances on cognitive testing. Despite this, few normative data are available for the heterogeneous Spanish-speaking population in the U.S.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To generate normative data on the Trail-Making Test (TMT), Bells Test, Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), and the Brief Test of Attention (BTA) for Spanish speakers residing in the U.S.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample included 245 Spanish-speaking individuals aged 18- 80 from eight states across the U.S. (California, Connecticut, Florida, Indiana, New Jersey, Oregon, Virginia, and Wisconsin). Participants were administered attention and processing speed measures as part of a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. We used a Bayesian regression approach to estimate normative data, including covariates found to be important for predicting performances on measures of attention and processing speed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sociodemographic factors including education, time in the U.S., acculturation, age, and/or sex had differential effects on the TMT-A, TMT-B, SDMT, and the BTA whereas the Bells Test was not influenced by any of these sociodemographic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that while sex, age, and educational attainment are important factors to consider, language and acculturation can also influence attention and processing speed performances among Spanish speakers in the U.S.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"169-182"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142351452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Heejun Kim, Jiwon Shin, Yunhwan Kim, Yongseok Lee, Joshua Sung H You
Background: Despite the promising effects of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) on balance and gait in post-stroke rehabilitation, the optimal predictors of fall-related balance and effective RAGT attributes remain unclear in post-stroke patients at a high risk of fall.
Objective: We aimed to determine the most accurate clinical machine learning (ML) algorithm for predicting fall-related balance factors and identifying RAGT attributes.
Methods: We applied five ML algorithms- logistic regression, random forest, decision tree, support vector machine (SVM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGboost)- to a dataset of 105 post-stroke patients undergoing RAGT. The variables included the Berg Balance Scale score, walking speed, steps, hip and knee active torques, functional ambulation categories, Fugl- Meyer assessment (FMA), the Korean version of the Modified Barthel Index, and fall history.
Results: The random forest algorithm excelled (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve; AUC = 0.91) in predicting balance improvement, outperforming the SVM (AUC = 0.76) and XGboost (AUC = 0.71). Key determinants identified were knee active torque, age, step count, number of RAGT sessions, FMA, and hip torque.
Conclusion: The random forest algorithm was the best prediction model for identifying fall-related balance and RAGT determinants, highlighting the importance of key factors for successful RAGT outcome performance in fall-related balance improvement.
{"title":"Identifying best fall-related balance factors and robotic-assisted gait training attributes in 105 post-stroke patients using clinical machine learning models.","authors":"Heejun Kim, Jiwon Shin, Yunhwan Kim, Yongseok Lee, Joshua Sung H You","doi":"10.3233/NRE-240116","DOIUrl":"10.3233/NRE-240116","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the promising effects of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) on balance and gait in post-stroke rehabilitation, the optimal predictors of fall-related balance and effective RAGT attributes remain unclear in post-stroke patients at a high risk of fall.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to determine the most accurate clinical machine learning (ML) algorithm for predicting fall-related balance factors and identifying RAGT attributes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied five ML algorithms- logistic regression, random forest, decision tree, support vector machine (SVM), and extreme gradient boosting (XGboost)- to a dataset of 105 post-stroke patients undergoing RAGT. The variables included the Berg Balance Scale score, walking speed, steps, hip and knee active torques, functional ambulation categories, Fugl- Meyer assessment (FMA), the Korean version of the Modified Barthel Index, and fall history.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The random forest algorithm excelled (receiver operating characteristic area under the curve; AUC = 0.91) in predicting balance improvement, outperforming the SVM (AUC = 0.76) and XGboost (AUC = 0.71). Key determinants identified were knee active torque, age, step count, number of RAGT sessions, FMA, and hip torque.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The random forest algorithm was the best prediction model for identifying fall-related balance and RAGT determinants, highlighting the importance of key factors for successful RAGT outcome performance in fall-related balance improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141731369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Stroke can lead to permanent and severe disability. Provision of information to stroke survivors and their carers could help them cope with consequences of stroke and aware of secondary prevention.
Objective: The aim of this Cochrane review was to assess the effects of active or passive information provision for stroke survivors or their carers.
Methods: The population addressed in this review included stroke survivors, their carers, or both. The intervention studied was provision of active or passive information compared to standard care or where information and another therapy were compared with the other therapy alone, or where the comparison was between active and passive information provision. The primary outcomes were knowledge about stroke and stroke services, and anxiety.
Conclusions: The authors concluded that the active provision of information may improve stroke survivors stroke-related knowledge and quality of life. It may reduce the cases and symptoms of anxiety and probably depression. The effect of active information provision to carers and passive information provision is still unclear; however, passive information may worsen stroke patients' symptoms of anxiety and depression.
{"title":"What are the effects of information provision for stroke survivors and their caregivers? A Cochrane Review summary with commentary.","authors":"Soo Chin Chan, Julia Patrick Engkasan","doi":"10.3233/NRE-246001","DOIUrl":"10.3233/NRE-246001","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke can lead to permanent and severe disability. Provision of information to stroke survivors and their carers could help them cope with consequences of stroke and aware of secondary prevention.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this Cochrane review was to assess the effects of active or passive information provision for stroke survivors or their carers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The population addressed in this review included stroke survivors, their carers, or both. The intervention studied was provision of active or passive information compared to standard care or where information and another therapy were compared with the other therapy alone, or where the comparison was between active and passive information provision. The primary outcomes were knowledge about stroke and stroke services, and anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors concluded that the active provision of information may improve stroke survivors stroke-related knowledge and quality of life. It may reduce the cases and symptoms of anxiety and probably depression. The effect of active information provision to carers and passive information provision is still unclear; however, passive information may worsen stroke patients' symptoms of anxiety and depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"54 1","pages":"167-169"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139567135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Diego Rivera, Anabel Forte, Laiene Olabarrieta-Landa, Paul B Perrin, Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla
Background: Hispanics are the largest growing ethnic minority group in the U.S. Despite significant progress in providing norms for this population, updated normative data are essential.
Objective: To present the methodology for a study generating normative neuropsychological test data for Spanish-speaking adults living in the U.S. using Bayesian inference as a novel approach.
Methods: The sample consisted of 253 healthy adults from eight U.S. regions, with individuals originating from a diverse array of Latin American countries. To participate, individuals must have met the following criteria: were between 18 and 80 years of age, had lived in the U.S. for at least 1 year, self-identified Spanish as their dominant language, had at least one year of formal education, were able to read and write in Spanish at the time of evaluation, scored≥23 on the Mini-Mental State Examination, <10 on the Patient Health Questionnaire- 9, and <10 on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale. Participants completed 12 neuropsychological tests. Reliability statistics and norms were calculated for all tests.
Conclusion: This is the first normative study for Spanish-speaking adults in the U.S. that uses Bayesian linear or generalized linear regression models for generating norms in neuropsychology, implementing sociocultural measures as possible covariates.
{"title":"Methodology for the generation of normative data for the U.S. adult Spanish-speaking population: A Bayesian approach.","authors":"Diego Rivera, Anabel Forte, Laiene Olabarrieta-Landa, Paul B Perrin, Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla","doi":"10.3233/NRE-240149","DOIUrl":"10.3233/NRE-240149","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hispanics are the largest growing ethnic minority group in the U.S. Despite significant progress in providing norms for this population, updated normative data are essential.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To present the methodology for a study generating normative neuropsychological test data for Spanish-speaking adults living in the U.S. using Bayesian inference as a novel approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample consisted of 253 healthy adults from eight U.S. regions, with individuals originating from a diverse array of Latin American countries. To participate, individuals must have met the following criteria: were between 18 and 80 years of age, had lived in the U.S. for at least 1 year, self-identified Spanish as their dominant language, had at least one year of formal education, were able to read and write in Spanish at the time of evaluation, scored≥23 on the Mini-Mental State Examination, <10 on the Patient Health Questionnaire- 9, and <10 on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale. Participants completed 12 neuropsychological tests. Reliability statistics and norms were calculated for all tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first normative study for Spanish-speaking adults in the U.S. that uses Bayesian linear or generalized linear regression models for generating norms in neuropsychology, implementing sociocultural measures as possible covariates.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"155-167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142292871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Impaired upper limb function in stroke survivors is characterized by muscle weakness, increased muscle tone, contracture, or impaired motor control.
Objective: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Kinesio-taping application for functional recovery on the affected arm and forearm during rehabilitation.
Methods: Forty-one patients eligible for this study were randomly assigned to either the Kinesio-taping group (n = 21), receiving Kinesio-taping intervention and conventional therapy, or control group (n = 20), receiving sham Kinesio-taping intervention and conventional therapy. The whole intervention lasted for 3 weeks. Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity, Barthel Index, the Stroke Impact Scale, and modified Ashworth scale were measured at 3 time points: baseline, post-treatment (3rd week), and follow-up (6th week).
Results: In the Kinesio-taping group, there were significant differences in the upper extremity (p = 0.003), wrist (p = 0.000) and hand (p = 0.000) parts of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity between the three assessment times. On the other hand, the Barthel Index showed significant differences in both groups after therapy.
Conclusion: Combining conventional rehabilitation with Kinesio-taping intervention may improve functional motor performance of both the proximal and distal parts of the affected upper extremity in stroke survivors, with potential benefits for activity of daily living.
{"title":"Effects of Kinesiotaping on upper limb function and daily activities in subacute or chronic stroke survivors: A randomized control study.","authors":"Chia-Hsin Chou, Yan-Yuh Lee, Po-Cheng Chen, Chau-Peng Leong, Yu-Chi Huang","doi":"10.3233/NRE-240047","DOIUrl":"10.3233/NRE-240047","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Impaired upper limb function in stroke survivors is characterized by muscle weakness, increased muscle tone, contracture, or impaired motor control.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Kinesio-taping application for functional recovery on the affected arm and forearm during rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-one patients eligible for this study were randomly assigned to either the Kinesio-taping group (n = 21), receiving Kinesio-taping intervention and conventional therapy, or control group (n = 20), receiving sham Kinesio-taping intervention and conventional therapy. The whole intervention lasted for 3 weeks. Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity, Barthel Index, the Stroke Impact Scale, and modified Ashworth scale were measured at 3 time points: baseline, post-treatment (3rd week), and follow-up (6th week).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the Kinesio-taping group, there were significant differences in the upper extremity (p = 0.003), wrist (p = 0.000) and hand (p = 0.000) parts of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity between the three assessment times. On the other hand, the Barthel Index showed significant differences in both groups after therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining conventional rehabilitation with Kinesio-taping intervention may improve functional motor performance of both the proximal and distal parts of the affected upper extremity in stroke survivors, with potential benefits for activity of daily living.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"629-637"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141437294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}