Pain Medicine最新文献

Objective: To investigate the predictive value of thoracic sympathetic ganglion block (TSGB) in response to ketamine infusion therapy (KIT) and spinal-cord stimulation (SCS) in patients with chronic upper-extremity pain including complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS).

Design: Retrospective.

Setting: Tertiary hospital single-center.

Subjects: Patients who underwent TSGB receiving KIT or SCS within a 3-year window.

Methods: Positive TSGB outcomes were defined as ≥2 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score reduction at 2 weeks post-procedure. Positive KIT and SCS outcomes were determined by ≥2 NRS score reduction at 2-4 weeks post-KIT and ≥4 NRS score reduction at 2-4 weeks post-SCS implantation, respectively.

Results: Among 207 patients who underwent TSGB, 38 received KIT and 34 underwent SCS implantation within 3 years post-TSGB; 33 patients receiving KIT and 32 patients receiving SCS were included. Among 33 patients who received KIT, 60.6% (n = 20) reported a ≥ 2 0-10 NRS pain-score reduction. Positive response to TSGB occurred in 70.0% (n = 14) KIT responders, significantly higher than that in 30.8% (n = 4) KIT non-responders. Multivariable analysis revealed a positive association between positive responses to TSGB and KIT (OR 7.004, 95% CI 1.26-39.02). Among 32 patients who underwent SCS implantation, 68.8% (n = 22) experienced short-term effectiveness. Positive response to TSGB was significantly higher in SCS responders (45.5%, n = 10) than in non-responders (0.0%). However, there were no associations between pain reduction post-TSGB and that post-KIT or post-SCS.

Conclusions: A positive response to TSGB is a potential predictor for positive KIT and SCS outcomes among patients with chronic upper-extremity pain, including CRPS.

The field of pain medicine mourns the passing of Professor Michael J. Cousins, a towering figure who reshaped the landscape of pain management for anesthetists and pain specialists globally. Professor Cousins was not merely a luminary in the field; he was a visionary whose contributions have profoundly shaped the understanding and treatment of pain.

Introduction: Pain is a prevalent side-effect seen in breast cancer survivors (BCS). Psychological factors are known role-players in pain mechanisms. Both pain and psychological factors contribute to or interact with healthcare use (HCU). However, the association between psychological factors and HCU has never been investigated in BCS with pain, which is aimed in this study.

Methods: Belgian BCS with pain (n = 122) were assessed by the Medical Consumption Questionnaire, Injustice Experienced Questionnaire, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire, Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire, and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale. Associations were analyzed using logistic and Poisson regressions.

Results: Opioid use was related to more catastrophizing and less psychological distress. Psychotropic drug was related to more psychological distress. Endocrine therapy related to less vigilance and awareness. Psychological distress related to all types of healthcare provider (HCP), with psychological distress negatively related to physiotherapy, psychology, and other primary HCP visits, and positively with visiting a general practitioner and secondary HCP. Catastrophizing related to more visiting behavior in primary HCP, except to a general practitioner. Perceived injustice related to more general practitioner and other primary HCP visits, but to fewer psychology visits. Illness perceptions are only related to visiting other primary HCP. Vigilance and awareness was related to more psychologist and secondary HCP visits.

Conclusion: Our findings underscore the complex interplay between HCU and psychological factors in BCS with pain. Psychological distress was overall the most important psychological factor related to HCU, whether catastrophizing and perceived injustice were the most relevant related to HCP visits.

Background: It is well established that catastrophic thinking about pain modulates clinical pain severity, but it may also relate to interindividual differences in the pain experience during procedures. This mixed-methods study investigated the relationship between ratings of situational pain catastrophizing and reported pain sensitivity in the context of receiving a nerve block without sedation, and explored participants' experiences.

Methods: Healthy volunteers (n = 42) completed baseline psychosocial questionnaires, underwent quantitative sensory testing, and received a lower extremity nerve block, followed by further psychosocial assessment and interviews. Associations of catastrophizing scores with pain sensitivity and procedural site pain were assessed using Spearman's correlations. Interviews were reviewed using an immersion/crystallization approach to identify emergent themes.

Results: Greater situational catastrophizing scores were associated with higher pain sensitivity, measured as lower pain threshold and tolerance. Although females exhibited greater pain sensitivity generally, moderation analysis revealed a significant association between situational catastrophizing scores and pain sensitivity only among male participants. Qualitative interviews revealed the importance of participants' emotional responses to pain, and a mismatch of expectation and experience with procedural pain. Males also reported more negative comments about procedural pain.

Discussion: Examination of the variable subjective experience while receiving a nerve block in this experimental lab-based study revealed an important relationship between situational pain catastrophizing scores and pain sensitivity, which was more prominent among male participants. These findings reinforce how insight into individual expectations, emotions, and thought processes may impact pain sensitivity during procedures, and may inform strategies to personalize care, improving patient satisfaction and procedural acceptance.