Zachary L McCormick, Robert W Hurley, Magdalena Anitescu, Arun Bhaskar, Anuj Bhatia, Ryan Carter Cassidy, Allen S Chen, Timothy C Dawson, Javier De Andrés Ares, José Luiz de Campos, Salim M Hayek, Berenice Carolina Hernández-Porras, Narayan R Kissoon, Lynn R Kohan, María Francisca Elgueta Le Beuffe, Jee Youn Moon, David A Provenzano, David E Reece, Nathaniel M Schuster, Clark C Smith, Alison Stout, Karolina Szadek, Donna-Ann Thomas, Nuj Tontisirin, Michael F Vagg, Jan Van Zundert, Anna Woodbury, Steven P Cohen
<p><strong>Background: </strong>The past two decades have witnessed tremendous growth in the appreciation and treatment of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) complex pain, including anatomical dissections that shed light on innervation, an appreciation for the contribution of extra-articular components to SIJ complex pain, the advent of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and a host of minimally invasive surgical techniques. Yet, there is no standardization on diagnosis and treatment paradigms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In February 2023, the Boards of Directors for the American Academy of Pain Medicine (AAPM) and American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine (ASRA-PM) approved the development of multispecialty guidelines on SIJ complex pain. Thirty partner organizations with clinical and scientific interests in SIJ complex pain were identified, and formal letters of request-for-participation were sent to each, along with a request for nominees to serve on the committee. Twenty five organizations agreed to participate in addition to the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs. A steering committee developed 21 questions, which spanned criteria for diagnosis, non-interventional and interventional treatments including surgery, technical parameters on how to optimize results, and what constitutes positive outcomes. Questions were methodically assigned to specialized modules comprising 4-5 members with complementary expertise, who collaborated with the Subcommittee Lead and one of three Committee Chairs to develop preliminary drafts. Following thorough revisions, these drafts were subsequently submitted to the full committee for comprehensive review. A modified Delphi method was used in which the answers to questions were sent to the committee en bloc and comments were returned in a non-blinded fashion to the Chairs, who incorporated the comments and sent out revised versions until consensus was achieved. During a committee meeting before commencement, it was agreed that recommendations would be noted when there was >50% agreement among committee members, but that a formal recommendation would require ≥75% consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one organizations formally endorsed the guidelines. The American Society of Anesthesiologists, and American Academy of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, and the North American Spine Society affirmed the benefit of the guidelines but did not officially endorse them. The American Academy of Neurology declined to affirm the benefit of the guidelines citing "lack of relevance to their membership." Per policies, while the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs did not formally review the guidelines for endorsement, their representatives approved them. In addition to being endorsed or the benefit affirmed by all voting organizations, complete consensus from committee members was obtained on all 21 questions. On 2 recommendations, there were dissensions from 3 societies who thought that selecting p
{"title":"Consensus practice guidelines on sacroiliac joint complex pain from a multispecialty, international working group.","authors":"Zachary L McCormick, Robert W Hurley, Magdalena Anitescu, Arun Bhaskar, Anuj Bhatia, Ryan Carter Cassidy, Allen S Chen, Timothy C Dawson, Javier De Andrés Ares, José Luiz de Campos, Salim M Hayek, Berenice Carolina Hernández-Porras, Narayan R Kissoon, Lynn R Kohan, María Francisca Elgueta Le Beuffe, Jee Youn Moon, David A Provenzano, David E Reece, Nathaniel M Schuster, Clark C Smith, Alison Stout, Karolina Szadek, Donna-Ann Thomas, Nuj Tontisirin, Michael F Vagg, Jan Van Zundert, Anna Woodbury, Steven P Cohen","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf129","DOIUrl":"10.1093/pm/pnaf129","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The past two decades have witnessed tremendous growth in the appreciation and treatment of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) complex pain, including anatomical dissections that shed light on innervation, an appreciation for the contribution of extra-articular components to SIJ complex pain, the advent of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and a host of minimally invasive surgical techniques. Yet, there is no standardization on diagnosis and treatment paradigms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In February 2023, the Boards of Directors for the American Academy of Pain Medicine (AAPM) and American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine (ASRA-PM) approved the development of multispecialty guidelines on SIJ complex pain. Thirty partner organizations with clinical and scientific interests in SIJ complex pain were identified, and formal letters of request-for-participation were sent to each, along with a request for nominees to serve on the committee. Twenty five organizations agreed to participate in addition to the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs. A steering committee developed 21 questions, which spanned criteria for diagnosis, non-interventional and interventional treatments including surgery, technical parameters on how to optimize results, and what constitutes positive outcomes. Questions were methodically assigned to specialized modules comprising 4-5 members with complementary expertise, who collaborated with the Subcommittee Lead and one of three Committee Chairs to develop preliminary drafts. Following thorough revisions, these drafts were subsequently submitted to the full committee for comprehensive review. A modified Delphi method was used in which the answers to questions were sent to the committee en bloc and comments were returned in a non-blinded fashion to the Chairs, who incorporated the comments and sent out revised versions until consensus was achieved. During a committee meeting before commencement, it was agreed that recommendations would be noted when there was >50% agreement among committee members, but that a formal recommendation would require ≥75% consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one organizations formally endorsed the guidelines. The American Society of Anesthesiologists, and American Academy of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, and the North American Spine Society affirmed the benefit of the guidelines but did not officially endorse them. The American Academy of Neurology declined to affirm the benefit of the guidelines citing \"lack of relevance to their membership.\" Per policies, while the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs did not formally review the guidelines for endorsement, their representatives approved them. In addition to being endorsed or the benefit affirmed by all voting organizations, complete consensus from committee members was obtained on all 21 questions. On 2 recommendations, there were dissensions from 3 societies who thought that selecting p","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"817-917"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12681192/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145636632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Eyal D Maoz Halevy, Allison Verhaak, Yin Wu, Dale S Bond, Lucas J Carr, Brian Grosberg, Olivia Begasse de Dhaem
{"title":"Evaluating Physical Activity Levels in Patients with Migraine: Insights from a Tertiary Headache Center Using the Exercise Vital Sign (EVS) Tool.","authors":"Eyal D Maoz Halevy, Allison Verhaak, Yin Wu, Dale S Bond, Lucas J Carr, Brian Grosberg, Olivia Begasse de Dhaem","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf166","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf166","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145605389","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Amanda S Bruce, Tara M D Mullen, Megan Behrman, Jade Robichaud, Ruobin Wei, Nivedita Chaudhary, Anna M Georgiopoulos, Lael M Yonker, Jianghua He, Andrea L Chadwick, Jonathan Greenberg, Deborah Friedman
Background: Despite treatment advances, the majority of adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) experience chronic pain, negatively impacting quality of life. CF Foundation guidelines call for a multi-modal approach to pain management. While non-pharmacologic behavioral interventions are an effective and safe component of such an approach, there are no existing behavioral interventions that have been designed specifically for adults with CF who experience chronic pain.
Objective: We created a novel cognitive-behavioral and mind-body intervention tailored to the needs, preferences, and experiences of adults with CF and chronic pain.
Methods: Individual qualitative interviews were conducted with 14 adults with CF and chronic pain. A hybrid inductive-deductive thematic analysis was conducted to identify themes regarding needs and preferences to inform intervention development.
Results: We identified the following themes: 1) the importance of addressing mental health, 2) need for an individualized/tailored program, 3) preference for CF care team delivery, 4) CF-specific modifications of proposed content, 5) barriers and facilitators of patient engagement with a mind-body pain management intervention in CF.
Discussion: Adults with CF provided vital feedback on the structure and substance of a cognitive-behavioral and mind-body intervention for chronic pain, which was utilized to create the Pain Acknowledgement, Coping, and Empowerment (PACE CF), a program to be delivered as part of routine care in CF centers.
{"title":"Patient-centered development of a cognitive behavioral pain intervention for cystic fibrosis: The pace CF program.","authors":"Amanda S Bruce, Tara M D Mullen, Megan Behrman, Jade Robichaud, Ruobin Wei, Nivedita Chaudhary, Anna M Georgiopoulos, Lael M Yonker, Jianghua He, Andrea L Chadwick, Jonathan Greenberg, Deborah Friedman","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf167","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf167","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite treatment advances, the majority of adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) experience chronic pain, negatively impacting quality of life. CF Foundation guidelines call for a multi-modal approach to pain management. While non-pharmacologic behavioral interventions are an effective and safe component of such an approach, there are no existing behavioral interventions that have been designed specifically for adults with CF who experience chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We created a novel cognitive-behavioral and mind-body intervention tailored to the needs, preferences, and experiences of adults with CF and chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individual qualitative interviews were conducted with 14 adults with CF and chronic pain. A hybrid inductive-deductive thematic analysis was conducted to identify themes regarding needs and preferences to inform intervention development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified the following themes: 1) the importance of addressing mental health, 2) need for an individualized/tailored program, 3) preference for CF care team delivery, 4) CF-specific modifications of proposed content, 5) barriers and facilitators of patient engagement with a mind-body pain management intervention in CF.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Adults with CF provided vital feedback on the structure and substance of a cognitive-behavioral and mind-body intervention for chronic pain, which was utilized to create the Pain Acknowledgement, Coping, and Empowerment (PACE CF), a program to be delivered as part of routine care in CF centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145582291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rena Elizabeth Courtney, Jody Caretti, Jessica Dunham, Laura Curry, Stephanie Smith, Camden O Novikova
{"title":"Anti-Inflammatory Kitchen: Feasibility and Acceptability of a Cooking Demonstration Class for Veterans with Chronic Pain.","authors":"Rena Elizabeth Courtney, Jody Caretti, Jessica Dunham, Laura Curry, Stephanie Smith, Camden O Novikova","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf164","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf164","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145564890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yun-Yun K Chen, Jenna M Wilson, Sheila R Gokul, Patrick W Collins, Martin Kiik, Emily Rosado, Kamen V Vlassakov, Kristin L Schreiber
{"title":"When Clinical Intuition Fails: Exploration of Clinicians' Underrecognition of Preoperative Pain Catastrophizing Despite Direct Observation.","authors":"Yun-Yun K Chen, Jenna M Wilson, Sheila R Gokul, Patrick W Collins, Martin Kiik, Emily Rosado, Kamen V Vlassakov, Kristin L Schreiber","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf158","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf158","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145549754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
John A Sturgeon, Noel Vest, Meredith Barad, Beth Darnall, Sean Mackey
Objective: Chronic migraine is a condition marked by highly frequent, intense, and disabling headaches. However, less commonly examined symptoms, such as persistent fatigue, widespread non-cephalic pain, and post-traumatic stress disorder, may also play a key role in migraine-relevant clinical outcomes.
Methods: The current study utilized retrospective clinical registry data from 704 treatment-seeking patients with chronic migraine to examine longitudinal trajectories of pain intensity and pain-related life interference using linear growth modeling.
Results: High levels of co-occurring non-cephalic pain (71.9% of patients) were noted in this sample. Patients endorsing more widespread pain reported higher average levels of pain intensity over time (β = 0.189 [0.103, 0.275], p < 0.001) and less improvement in pain interference over time (β = 0.328 [0.131, 0.525], p = 0.001). Additional findings included greater reductions in pain interference among patients with higher baseline levels of pain intensity (β = -0.185 [-0.351, -0.020], p = 0.028) and fatigue (β = -0.280 [-0.493, -0.067], p = 0.010) and non-significant associations between post-traumatic stress symptoms and pain intensity and pain interference in all models.
Conclusions: The current findings suggest that clinical factors sometimes overlooked in headache research, such as co-occurring non-cephalic pain and fatigue, may contribute to trajectories of treatment response and psychosocial function in chronic migraine. Future research may benefit from examining these factors in headache-specific treatment settings and in the context of examining the effects of multidisciplinary care on patients with complex symptom presentations.
目的:慢性偏头痛是一种以频繁、剧烈和致残头痛为特征的疾病。然而,不常被检查的症状,如持续疲劳、广泛的非头部疼痛和创伤后应激障碍,也可能在偏头痛相关的临床结果中起关键作用。方法:本研究利用704例寻求治疗的慢性偏头痛患者的回顾性临床登记数据,使用线性增长模型检查疼痛强度和疼痛相关生活干扰的纵向轨迹。结果:在该样本中注意到高水平的同时发生的非头侧疼痛(71.9%的患者)。随着时间的推移,更广泛疼痛的患者报告了更高的平均疼痛强度水平(β = 0.189 [0.103, 0.275], p < 0.001),疼痛干扰的改善较少(β = 0.328 [0.131, 0.525], p = 0.001)。其他研究结果包括基线疼痛强度较高(β = -0.185 [-0.351, -0.020], p = 0.028)和疲劳(β = -0.280 [-0.493, -0.067], p = 0.010)的患者疼痛干扰减少更大,所有模型中创伤后应激症状与疼痛强度和疼痛干扰之间无显著关联。结论:目前的研究结果表明,在头痛研究中有时被忽视的临床因素,如同时发生的非头侧疼痛和疲劳,可能有助于慢性偏头痛的治疗反应和社会心理功能的轨迹。未来的研究可能会受益于在头痛特定治疗环境中检查这些因素,以及在检查多学科护理对复杂症状表现患者的影响的背景下。
{"title":"Beyond Headache: Non-cephalic Pain, Fatigue, and Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms as Longitudinal Predictors of Chronic Migraine Outcomes.","authors":"John A Sturgeon, Noel Vest, Meredith Barad, Beth Darnall, Sean Mackey","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf162","DOIUrl":"10.1093/pm/pnaf162","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Chronic migraine is a condition marked by highly frequent, intense, and disabling headaches. However, less commonly examined symptoms, such as persistent fatigue, widespread non-cephalic pain, and post-traumatic stress disorder, may also play a key role in migraine-relevant clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current study utilized retrospective clinical registry data from 704 treatment-seeking patients with chronic migraine to examine longitudinal trajectories of pain intensity and pain-related life interference using linear growth modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High levels of co-occurring non-cephalic pain (71.9% of patients) were noted in this sample. Patients endorsing more widespread pain reported higher average levels of pain intensity over time (β = 0.189 [0.103, 0.275], p < 0.001) and less improvement in pain interference over time (β = 0.328 [0.131, 0.525], p = 0.001). Additional findings included greater reductions in pain interference among patients with higher baseline levels of pain intensity (β = -0.185 [-0.351, -0.020], p = 0.028) and fatigue (β = -0.280 [-0.493, -0.067], p = 0.010) and non-significant associations between post-traumatic stress symptoms and pain intensity and pain interference in all models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current findings suggest that clinical factors sometimes overlooked in headache research, such as co-occurring non-cephalic pain and fatigue, may contribute to trajectories of treatment response and psychosocial function in chronic migraine. Future research may benefit from examining these factors in headache-specific treatment settings and in the context of examining the effects of multidisciplinary care on patients with complex symptom presentations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12715711/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145549791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hallie Tankha, Devyn Gaskins, Ning Guo, Amanda J Shallcross
{"title":"The protective role of body responsiveness in the relationship between pain intensity and depression: Evidence from a racially and ethnically diverse sample.","authors":"Hallie Tankha, Devyn Gaskins, Ning Guo, Amanda J Shallcross","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf154","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf154","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145506159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Joanne Salas, Lisa R Miller-Matero, Mark D Sullivan, Scott Secrest, Lauren Wilson, Celeste Pappas, Patrick J Lustman, Brian Ahmedani, Ryan W Carpenter, Jeffrey F Scherrer
Objective: Numerous risk factors for persistent pain severity and pain related interference have been identified but opioid use characteristics associated with pain trajectories are understudied. We determined if opioid dose and frequency of use were associated with non-cancer chronic pain trajectories.
Methods: Participants starting a new period of prescription opioid use lasting 30-90 days were recruited from two health care systems that deliver care in Michigan, Illinois, Missouri, Oklahoma and Wisconsin. Participants completed structured surveys at baseline and completed up to twelve monthly surveys for PEG-assessed pain severity and interference. Growth mixture modeling was used to compute trajectories. Multinomial, logistic regression models estimated the association between patient opioid use characteristics and trajectory membership, after adjusting for covariates.
Results: The sample (n = 842) was, on average, 53.8 ± 11.8 years of age, 68.8% female and 29.0% non-white race. The best fitting model was a 3-class solution with trajectories characterized as "mild-improving," "severe-improving," and "stable-severe". Opioid dose ≥50 morphine milligram equivalent and daily vs. non-daily opioid use were not associated with these trajectories. More pain sites was significantly associated with severe improving and stable-severe vs. the mild-improving trajectory. Higher income and ability to participate in social roles were inversely associated with membership in the -stable-severe trajectory.
Conclusions: In this sample with 30-90 days of opioid use at baseline, we identified three pain trajectories. Relatively few patient characteristics were associated with pain severity and interference trajectories. Opioid dose and frequency of use were not predictors of the course of non-cancer pain.
{"title":"Association of Opioid Dose and Use Frequency with 12-Month Pain Severity and Function Trajectories.","authors":"Joanne Salas, Lisa R Miller-Matero, Mark D Sullivan, Scott Secrest, Lauren Wilson, Celeste Pappas, Patrick J Lustman, Brian Ahmedani, Ryan W Carpenter, Jeffrey F Scherrer","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf156","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf156","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Numerous risk factors for persistent pain severity and pain related interference have been identified but opioid use characteristics associated with pain trajectories are understudied. We determined if opioid dose and frequency of use were associated with non-cancer chronic pain trajectories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants starting a new period of prescription opioid use lasting 30-90 days were recruited from two health care systems that deliver care in Michigan, Illinois, Missouri, Oklahoma and Wisconsin. Participants completed structured surveys at baseline and completed up to twelve monthly surveys for PEG-assessed pain severity and interference. Growth mixture modeling was used to compute trajectories. Multinomial, logistic regression models estimated the association between patient opioid use characteristics and trajectory membership, after adjusting for covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample (n = 842) was, on average, 53.8 ± 11.8 years of age, 68.8% female and 29.0% non-white race. The best fitting model was a 3-class solution with trajectories characterized as \"mild-improving,\" \"severe-improving,\" and \"stable-severe\". Opioid dose ≥50 morphine milligram equivalent and daily vs. non-daily opioid use were not associated with these trajectories. More pain sites was significantly associated with severe improving and stable-severe vs. the mild-improving trajectory. Higher income and ability to participate in social roles were inversely associated with membership in the -stable-severe trajectory.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this sample with 30-90 days of opioid use at baseline, we identified three pain trajectories. Relatively few patient characteristics were associated with pain severity and interference trajectories. Opioid dose and frequency of use were not predictors of the course of non-cancer pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145488939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pablo Kot Baixauli, Lucas Rovira Soriano, Javier Jesús Perez Rey, Pablo Rodríguez Gimillo, Silvia Pozo, Beatriz Cano, Jose De Andrés
{"title":"Shear-Wave Elastography in Myofascial Pain Syndrome: Research Letter.","authors":"Pablo Kot Baixauli, Lucas Rovira Soriano, Javier Jesús Perez Rey, Pablo Rodríguez Gimillo, Silvia Pozo, Beatriz Cano, Jose De Andrés","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf157","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf157","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145489204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ahmed Mansour, Ahmed Mostafa Amin, Ahmed Farid Gadelmawla, Ahmed Elbataa, Anas Mansour, Mohamed Ismail Elnady, Muhammad Ashraf Husain, Omar Abdulrahman Saad, Amr Elshahat, Abdallah Abbas, Ahmed Elshahat, Youssef Mahmoud, Sohaila Mansour Abdelsatar, Mohamed Yasser Elnaggar, Ayman E Fayk, Abdullah Farahat Elbanna, Alaa Abd-Elsayed
Background and objective: Pregabalin (PGB) and duloxetine (DLX) are commonly used first-line medications in the clinical management of painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN), yet high-quality comparative evidence is limited. This meta-analysis evaluates the comparative efficacy and safety of PGB versus DLX, focusing on efficacy outcomes such as pain reduction and mental health, and safety outcomes including adverse events in PDN patients.
Method: We searched electronic databases for relevant studies assessing the efficacy and safety of PGB and DLX in PDN. The primary outcomes were the mean change of the visual analog scale (VAS) and the improvement ratio for patients achieving ≥ 50% pain reduction. Secondary outcomes, including the numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain, the short form 12 health survey (SF-12), and related adverse events. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to evaluate these outcomes.
Results: We analyzed 19 studies involving 4,483 patients. PGB significantly reduced VAS scores at 24 weeks (MD = -0.38; 95% CI [-0.45, -0.31], P < 0.0001) and decreased the mental component of SF-12 compared to DLX (MD = -3.36; 95% CI [-6.64, -0.07], P = 0.05) and lower rates of achieving >50% pain reduction (RR = 0.88; 95% CI [0.79, 0.98], P = 0.03). Regarding safety, PGB showed a lower incidence of several adverse events, including anorexia, decreased appetite, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. However, no significant differences in VAS scores were observed between PGB and DLX at 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks, with similar results observed in NRS.
Conclusion: We found that PGB and DLX showed similar efficacy in relieving PDN. Ultimately, the two drugs' similar effectiveness and different safety profiles highlight the importance of considering patient-specific factors when choosing the appropriate treatment.
背景与目的:普瑞巴林(PGB)和度洛西汀(DLX)是临床治疗疼痛性糖尿病神经病变(PDN)常用的一线药物,但高质量的比较证据有限。本荟萃分析评估了PGB与DLX的比较疗效和安全性,重点关注PDN患者的疗效结果(如疼痛减轻和心理健康)和安全性结果(包括不良事件)。方法:检索电子数据库中有关PGB和DLX治疗PDN的疗效和安全性的相关研究。主要结局是视觉模拟评分(VAS)的平均变化和患者疼痛减轻≥50%的改善比率。次要结果包括疼痛的数值评定量表(NRS)、简短的12健康调查(SF-12)和相关不良事件。进行随机效应荟萃分析来评估这些结果。结果:我们分析了19项研究,涉及4483例患者。PGB显著降低了24周VAS评分(MD = -0.38; 95% CI[-0.45, -0.31]),疼痛减轻50% (RR = 0.88; 95% CI [0.79, 0.98], P = 0.03)。在安全性方面,PGB显示出较低的不良事件发生率,包括厌食、食欲下降、腹泻、恶心和呕吐。然而,PGB和DLX在1周、2周、4周、6周、8周和12周的VAS评分无显著差异,NRS的结果相似。结论:PGB与DLX对PDN的缓解作用相似。最终,这两种药物相似的疗效和不同的安全性突出了在选择适当治疗时考虑患者特异性因素的重要性。
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin and Duloxetine in Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Ahmed Mansour, Ahmed Mostafa Amin, Ahmed Farid Gadelmawla, Ahmed Elbataa, Anas Mansour, Mohamed Ismail Elnady, Muhammad Ashraf Husain, Omar Abdulrahman Saad, Amr Elshahat, Abdallah Abbas, Ahmed Elshahat, Youssef Mahmoud, Sohaila Mansour Abdelsatar, Mohamed Yasser Elnaggar, Ayman E Fayk, Abdullah Farahat Elbanna, Alaa Abd-Elsayed","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf155","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf155","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Pregabalin (PGB) and duloxetine (DLX) are commonly used first-line medications in the clinical management of painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN), yet high-quality comparative evidence is limited. This meta-analysis evaluates the comparative efficacy and safety of PGB versus DLX, focusing on efficacy outcomes such as pain reduction and mental health, and safety outcomes including adverse events in PDN patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We searched electronic databases for relevant studies assessing the efficacy and safety of PGB and DLX in PDN. The primary outcomes were the mean change of the visual analog scale (VAS) and the improvement ratio for patients achieving ≥ 50% pain reduction. Secondary outcomes, including the numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain, the short form 12 health survey (SF-12), and related adverse events. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to evaluate these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 19 studies involving 4,483 patients. PGB significantly reduced VAS scores at 24 weeks (MD = -0.38; 95% CI [-0.45, -0.31], P < 0.0001) and decreased the mental component of SF-12 compared to DLX (MD = -3.36; 95% CI [-6.64, -0.07], P = 0.05) and lower rates of achieving >50% pain reduction (RR = 0.88; 95% CI [0.79, 0.98], P = 0.03). Regarding safety, PGB showed a lower incidence of several adverse events, including anorexia, decreased appetite, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. However, no significant differences in VAS scores were observed between PGB and DLX at 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks, with similar results observed in NRS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that PGB and DLX showed similar efficacy in relieving PDN. Ultimately, the two drugs' similar effectiveness and different safety profiles highlight the importance of considering patient-specific factors when choosing the appropriate treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145482779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}