Pediatric Anesthesia最新文献

Background: High-flow nasal oxygenation is reported to prolong duration of apnea while maintaining adequate oxygen saturation with the mouth closed. Also, buccal oxygenation is known to have similar effects in obese adults. We compared the effect of these two methods on prolongation of acceptable apnea time in pediatric patients with their mouth open.

Methods: Thirty-eight patients, aged 0-10 years were randomly allocated to either the high-flow nasal oxygenation group (n = 17) or the buccal oxygenation group (n = 21). After induction of anesthesia including neuromuscular blockade, manual ventilation was initiated until the expiratory oxygen concentration reached 90%. Subsequently, ventilation was paused, and the patient's head was extended, and mouth was opened. The HFNO group received 2 L·min^-1·kg^-1 of oxygen, and the BO group received 0.5 L·min^-1·kg^-1 of oxygen. We set a target apnea time according to previous literature. When the apnea time reached the target, we defined the case as "success" in prolongation of safe apnea time and resumed ventilation. When the pulse oximetry decreased to 92% before the target apnea time, it was recorded as "failure" and rescue ventilation was given.

Results: The success rate of safe apnea prolongation was 100% in the high-flow nasal oxygenation group compared to 76% in the buccal oxygenation group (p = .04). Oxygen reserve index, end-tidal or transcutaneous carbon dioxide partial pressure, and pulse oximetry did not differ between groups.

Conclusion: High-flow nasal oxygenation is effective in maintaining appropriate arterial oxygen saturation during apnea even in children with their mouth open and is superior to buccal oxygenation. Buccal oxygenation may be a good alternative when high-flow nasal oxygenation is not available.

Introduction: This quality improvement initiative is a continued pursuit to optimize outcomes by iteratively improving our opioid sparing anesthesia protocol for tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy at our pediatric ambulatory surgical center through data driven Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles.

Methods: From 1/2015 through 12/2023, our standardized tonsillectomy protocol underwent nine procedure-specific perioperative Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, three procedure-specific postoperative prescription Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles, and four general ambulatory surgical center enhanced recovery Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. We analyzed data from the medical record using statistical process control charts. The primary outcome measure was the percent of patients requiring intravenous opioid in the post anesthesia care unit. Secondary outcomes included maximum post anesthesia care unit pain score, the percent of patients requiring treatment for nausea and/or vomiting in the post anesthesia care unit, and the number of postoperative opioid prescription dosages. Balancing measures were average post anesthesia care unit length of stay, percent of patients with prolonged Post Anesthesia Care Unit length of stay (>120 min), and 30-day reoperation rate.

Results: A total of 5654 tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy cases were performed at our ambulatory surgical center from 2015 to 2023. The incidence of intravenous opioid administered in the post anesthesia care unit initially rose with opioid free anesthesia launch, but subsequently decreased below the target of 10%. Maximum post anesthesia care unit pain scores rose from mean 3.6 to 4.5, but subsequently returned to the baseline of 3.5, while the incidence of postoperative nausea and/or vomiting improved. The average post anesthesia care unit length of stay increased by 10 min with opioid free anesthesia; however, prolonged post anesthesia care unit stay and 30-day reoperation rates were unchanged.

Conclusions: The continued refinement of our opioid sparing anesthesia protocol has led to reduced perioperative and home opioid use, stable maximum post anesthesia care unit pain scores, and improved postoperative nausea and vomiting rates, with only a slight increase in mean post anesthesia care unit length of stay.

Introduction: This study aimed to assess the impact of positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the non-hypoxic apnea time in infants during anesthesia induction with an inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8.

Methods: This age stratified randomized controlled trial included patients under 1 year of age. Preoxygenation was performed using an inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 for 2 min. Inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 was administered via a face mask with volume-controlled ventilation at a tidal volume of 6 mL.kg^-1, with or without 7 cmH₂O of PEEP. Tracheal intubation was performed after 3 min of ventilation; however, it was disconnected from the breathing circuit. Ventilation was resumed once the pulse oximetry readings reached 95%. The primary outcome was the non-hypoxic apnea time, defined as the time from the cessation of ventilation to achieving a pulse oximeter reading of 95%. The secondary outcome measures included the degree of atelectasis assessed by ultrasonography and the presence of gastric air insufflation.

Results: Eighty-four patients were included in the final analysis. In the positive end-expiratory pressure group, the atelectasis score decreased (17.0 vs. 31.5, p < .001; mean difference and 95% CI of 11.6, 7.5-15.6), while the non-hypoxic apnea time increased (80.1 s vs. 70.6 s, p = .005; mean difference and 95% CI of -9.4, -16.0 to -2.9), compared to the zero end-expiratory pressure group, among infants who are 6 months old or younger, not in those aged older than 6 months.

Discussion: The application of positive end-expiratory pressure reduced the incidence of atelectasis and extended the non-hypoxic apnea time in infants who are 6 months old or younger. However, it did not affect the incidence of atelectasis nor the non-hypoxic apnea time in patients aged older than 6 months.

Domino liver transplantation and domino-auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation are emerging techniques that can expand the liver donor pool and provide hope for children with liver disease. The innovative technique of domino liver transplantation has emerged as a pioneering strategy, capitalizing on structurally preserved livers from donors exhibiting single enzymatic defects within a morphologically normal context, effectively broadening the donor pool. Concurrently, the increasingly prevalent domino-auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation method assumes a critical role in bolstering available donor resources. These advanced transplantation methods present a unique opportunity for pediatric patients who, despite having structurally and functionally intact livers and lacking early signs of portal hypertension or extrahepatic involvement, do not attain priority on conventional transplant lists. Utilizing optimal clinical conditions enhances posttransplant outcomes, benefiting patients who would otherwise endure extended waiting periods for traditional transplantation. The perioperative management of children undergoing these procedures is complex and requires careful consideration of some factors, including clinical and metabolic conditions of the specific metabolic disorder, and the need for tailored perioperative management planning. Furthermore, the prudent consideration of de novo disease development in the recipient assumes paramount significance when selecting suitable donors for domino liver transplantation, as it profoundly influences prognosis, mortality, and morbidity. This narrative review of domino liver transplantation will discuss the pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, perioperative management, and prognostic expectations, focusing on perioperative anesthetic considerations for children undergoing domino liver transplantation.

Background: An increasing number of centers are undertaking combined heart and liver transplantation in adult and pediatric patients with congenital heart disease.

Aim: The primary aim of this study was to describe the perioperative management of a single center cohort, identifying challenges and potential solutions.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients undergoing combined heart and liver transplantation at Stanford Children's Hospital from 2006 to 2022. Preoperative information included cardiac diagnosis, hemodynamics, and severity of liver disease. Intraoperative data included length of surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and blood products transfused. Postoperative data included blood products transfused in the intensive care unit, time to extubation, length of intensive care unit stay, survival outcomes and 30-day adverse events.

Results: Eighteen patients underwent en bloc combined heart and liver transplantation at Stanford Children's Hospital from 2006 to 2022, and the majority 15 (83%) were transplanted for failing Fontan circulation with Fontan Associated Liver Disease. Median surgical procedure time was 13.4 [11.5, 14.5] h with a cardiopulmonary bypass time of 4.3 [3.9, 5.8] h. Median total blood products transfused in the operating room post cardiopulmonary bypass was 89.4 [63.9, 127.0] mLs/kg. Nine patients (50%) had vasoplegia during cardiopulmonary bypass. Activated prothrombin complex concentrates were used post cardiopulmonary bypass in 15 (83%) patients with a 30-day thromboembolism rate of 22%. Median time to extubation was 4.0 [2.8, 6.5] days, median intensive care unit length of stay 20.0 [7.8, 48.3] days and median hospital length of stay 54.0 [30.5, 68.3] days. Incidence of renal replacement therapy was 11%; however, none required renal replacement therapy by the time of hospital discharge. Neurological events within 30 days were 17% and the 30 day and 1 year survival was 89%.

Conclusions: Perioperative challenges include major perioperative bleeding, unstable hemodynamics, and end organ injury including acute kidney injury and neurological events. Successful outcomes for en bloc combined heart and liver transplantation are possible with careful multidisciplinary planning, communication, patient selection, and integrated peri-operative management.