Pub Date : 2024-10-16DOI: 10.1124/pharmrev.124.001060
Mattias Carlström, Eddie Weitzberg, Jon O Lundberg
Nitric oxide (NO) from endothelial NO synthase importantly contributes to vascular homeostasis. Reduced NO production or increased scavenging during disease conditions with oxidative stress contribute to endothelial dysfunction and NO deficiency. In addition to the classical enzymatic NO synthases (NOS) system, NO can also be generated via the nitrate-nitrite-NO pathway. Dietary and pharmacological approaches aimed at increasing NO bioactivity, especially in the cardiovascular system, have been the focus of much research since the discovery of this small gaseous signaling molecule. Despite wide appreciation of the biological role of NOS/NO signaling, questions still remain about the chemical nature of NOS-derived bioactivity. Recent studies show that NO-like bioactivity can be efficiently transduced by mobile NO-ferroheme species, which can transfer between proteins, partition into a hydrophobic phase, and directly activate the soluble guanylyl cyclase-cGMP-protein kinase G pathway without intermediacy of free NO. Moreover, interaction between red blood cells and the endothelium in the regulation of vascular NO homeostasis have gained much attention, especially in conditions with cardiometabolic disease. In this review we discuss both classical and nonclassical pathways for NO generation in the cardiovascular system and how these can be modulated for therapeutic purposes. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: After four decades of intensive research, questions persist about the transduction and control of nitric oxide (NO) synthase bioactivity. Here we discuss NO signaling in cardiovascular health and disease, highlighting new findings, such as the important role of red blood cells in cardiovascular NO homeostasis. Nonclassical signaling modes, like the nitrate-nitrite-NO pathway, and therapeutic opportunities related to the NO system are discussed. Existing and potential pharmacological treatments/strategies, as well as dietary components influencing NO generation and signaling are covered.
内皮一氧化氮合酶(eNOS)产生的一氧化氮(NO)对血管稳态起着重要作用。在疾病和氧化应激条件下,一氧化氮生成减少或清除增加会导致内皮功能障碍和一氧化氮缺乏。除了经典的酶促 NOS 系统外,NO 还可通过硝酸盐-亚硝酸盐-NO 途径产生。自发现这种小型气体信号分子以来,旨在提高 NO 生物活性(尤其是在心血管系统中)的饮食和药物方法一直是许多研究的重点。尽管人们广泛认识到 NOS/NO 信号传导的生物学作用,但对 NOS 衍生生物活性的化学本质仍然存在疑问。最近的研究表明,类似于 NO 的生物活性可以通过可移动的 NO-铁血黄素物种有效地传递,这种物种可以在蛋白质之间转移,分化成疏水相,并直接激活 sGC-cGMP-PKG 通路,而不需要游离 NO 作为中介。此外,红细胞和血管内皮在调节血管 NO 平衡过程中的相互作用也备受关注,尤其是在心血管代谢疾病的情况下。在这篇综述中,我们将讨论心血管系统中 NO 生成的经典和非经典途径,以及如何调节这些途径以达到治疗目的。意义声明 经过四十年的深入研究,有关 NO 合成酶生物活性的传导和控制的问题依然存在。在此,我们讨论了心血管健康和疾病中的 NO 信号传导,重点介绍了一些新发现,如红细胞在心血管 NO 平衡中的重要作用。我们还讨论了硝酸盐-亚硝酸盐-NO 通路等非典型信号模式,以及与 NO 系统有关的治疗机会。内容还包括现有和潜在的药物治疗/策略,以及影响 NO 生成和信号转导的饮食成分。
{"title":"Nitric Oxide Signaling and Regulation in the Cardiovascular System: Recent Advances.","authors":"Mattias Carlström, Eddie Weitzberg, Jon O Lundberg","doi":"10.1124/pharmrev.124.001060","DOIUrl":"10.1124/pharmrev.124.001060","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nitric oxide (NO) from endothelial NO synthase importantly contributes to vascular homeostasis. Reduced NO production or increased scavenging during disease conditions with oxidative stress contribute to endothelial dysfunction and NO deficiency. In addition to the classical enzymatic NO synthases (NOS) system, NO can also be generated via the nitrate-nitrite-NO pathway. Dietary and pharmacological approaches aimed at increasing NO bioactivity, especially in the cardiovascular system, have been the focus of much research since the discovery of this small gaseous signaling molecule. Despite wide appreciation of the biological role of NOS/NO signaling, questions still remain about the chemical nature of NOS-derived bioactivity. Recent studies show that NO-like bioactivity can be efficiently transduced by mobile NO-ferroheme species, which can transfer between proteins, partition into a hydrophobic phase, and directly activate the soluble guanylyl cyclase-cGMP-protein kinase G pathway without intermediacy of free NO. Moreover, interaction between red blood cells and the endothelium in the regulation of vascular NO homeostasis have gained much attention, especially in conditions with cardiometabolic disease. In this review we discuss both classical and nonclassical pathways for NO generation in the cardiovascular system and how these can be modulated for therapeutic purposes. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: After four decades of intensive research, questions persist about the transduction and control of nitric oxide (NO) synthase bioactivity. Here we discuss NO signaling in cardiovascular health and disease, highlighting new findings, such as the important role of red blood cells in cardiovascular NO homeostasis. Nonclassical signaling modes, like the nitrate-nitrite-NO pathway, and therapeutic opportunities related to the NO system are discussed. Existing and potential pharmacological treatments/strategies, as well as dietary components influencing NO generation and signaling are covered.</p>","PeriodicalId":19780,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":19.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141311273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-16DOI: 10.1124/pharmrev.124.000978
Tiangang Li, John Y L Chiang
Bile acids are the end products of cholesterol catabolism. Hepatic bile acid synthesis accounts for a major fraction of daily cholesterol turnover in humans. Biliary secretion of bile acids generates bile flow and facilitates biliary secretion of lipids, endogenous metabolites, and xenobiotics. In intestine, bile acids facilitate the digestion and absorption of dietary lipids and fat-soluble vitamins. Through activation of nuclear receptors and G protein-coupled receptors and interaction with gut microbiome, bile acids critically regulate host metabolism and innate and adaptive immunity and are involved in the pathogenesis of cholestasis, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, alcohol-associated liver disease, type-2 diabetes, and inflammatory bowel diseases. Bile acids and their derivatives have been developed as potential therapeutic agents for treating chronic metabolic and inflammatory liver diseases and gastrointestinal disorders. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Bile acids facilitate biliary cholesterol solubilization and dietary lipid absorption, regulate host metabolism and immunity, and modulate gut microbiome. Targeting bile acid metabolism and signaling holds promise for treating metabolic and inflammatory diseases.
胆汁酸是胆固醇分解代谢的最终产物。肝脏合成的胆汁酸占人体每日胆固醇周转量的大部分。胆汁分泌胆汁酸可产生胆汁流,促进胆汁分泌脂质、内源性代谢物和异种生物。在肠道中,胆汁酸可促进食物中脂类和脂溶性维生素的消化和吸收。胆汁酸通过激活核受体和 G 蛋白偶联受体以及与肠道微生物群的相互作用,对宿主的新陈代谢以及先天性和适应性免疫进行重要调节,并参与胆汁淤积症、代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪肝(MASLD)、酒精相关性肝病(ALD)、2 型糖尿病和炎症性肠病(IBD)的发病机制。胆汁酸及其衍生物已被开发为治疗慢性代谢性和炎症性肝病以及胃肠道疾病的潜在治疗药物。意义声明 胆汁酸可促进胆汁中胆固醇的溶解和饮食中脂质的吸收,调节宿主代谢和免疫,并调节肠道微生物组。以胆汁酸代谢和信号传导为靶点,有望治疗代谢性和炎症性疾病。
{"title":"Bile Acid Signaling in Metabolic and Inflammatory Diseases and Drug Development.","authors":"Tiangang Li, John Y L Chiang","doi":"10.1124/pharmrev.124.000978","DOIUrl":"10.1124/pharmrev.124.000978","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bile acids are the end products of cholesterol catabolism. Hepatic bile acid synthesis accounts for a major fraction of daily cholesterol turnover in humans. Biliary secretion of bile acids generates bile flow and facilitates biliary secretion of lipids, endogenous metabolites, and xenobiotics. In intestine, bile acids facilitate the digestion and absorption of dietary lipids and fat-soluble vitamins. Through activation of nuclear receptors and G protein-coupled receptors and interaction with gut microbiome, bile acids critically regulate host metabolism and innate and adaptive immunity and are involved in the pathogenesis of cholestasis, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, alcohol-associated liver disease, type-2 diabetes, and inflammatory bowel diseases. Bile acids and their derivatives have been developed as potential therapeutic agents for treating chronic metabolic and inflammatory liver diseases and gastrointestinal disorders. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Bile acids facilitate biliary cholesterol solubilization and dietary lipid absorption, regulate host metabolism and immunity, and modulate gut microbiome. Targeting bile acid metabolism and signaling holds promise for treating metabolic and inflammatory diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":19780,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":19.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141559459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-16DOI: 10.1124/pharmrev.124.001117
Karin E Sandoval, Ken A Witt
Over 4 decades of research support the link between Alzheimer disease (AD) and somatostatin [somatotropin-releasing inhibitory factor (SRIF)]. SRIF and SRIF-expressing neurons play an essential role in brain function, modulating hippocampal activity and memory formation. Loss of SRIF and SRIF-expressing neurons in the brain rests at the center of a series of interdependent pathological events driven by amyloid-β peptide (Aβ), culminating in cognitive decline and dementia. The connection between the SRIF and AD further extends to the neuropsychiatric symptoms, seizure activity, and inflammation, whereas preclinical AD investigations show SRIF or SRIF receptor agonist administration capable of enhancing cognition. SRIF receptor subtype-4 activation in particular presents unique attributes, with the potential to mitigate learning and memory decline, reduce comorbid symptoms, and enhance enzymatic degradation of Aβ in the brain. Here, we review the links between SRIF and AD along with the therapeutic implications. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Somatostatin and somatostatin-expressing neurons in the brain are extensively involved in cognition. Loss of somatostatin and somatostatin-expressing neurons in Alzheimer disease rests at the center of a series of interdependent pathological events contributing to cognitive decline and dementia. Targeting somatostatin-mediated processes has significant therapeutic potential for the treatment of Alzheimer disease.
{"title":"Somatostatin: Linking Cognition and Alzheimer Disease to Therapeutic Targeting.","authors":"Karin E Sandoval, Ken A Witt","doi":"10.1124/pharmrev.124.001117","DOIUrl":"10.1124/pharmrev.124.001117","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over 4 decades of research support the link between Alzheimer disease (AD) and somatostatin [somatotropin-releasing inhibitory factor (SRIF)]. SRIF and SRIF-expressing neurons play an essential role in brain function, modulating hippocampal activity and memory formation. Loss of SRIF and SRIF-expressing neurons in the brain rests at the center of a series of interdependent pathological events driven by amyloid-<i>β</i> peptide (A<i>β</i>), culminating in cognitive decline and dementia. The connection between the SRIF and AD further extends to the neuropsychiatric symptoms, seizure activity, and inflammation, whereas preclinical AD investigations show SRIF or SRIF receptor agonist administration capable of enhancing cognition. SRIF receptor subtype-4 activation in particular presents unique attributes, with the potential to mitigate learning and memory decline, reduce comorbid symptoms, and enhance enzymatic degradation of A<i>β</i> in the brain. Here, we review the links between SRIF and AD along with the therapeutic implications. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Somatostatin and somatostatin-expressing neurons in the brain are extensively involved in cognition. Loss of somatostatin and somatostatin-expressing neurons in Alzheimer disease rests at the center of a series of interdependent pathological events contributing to cognitive decline and dementia. Targeting somatostatin-mediated processes has significant therapeutic potential for the treatment of Alzheimer disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":19780,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":19.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141627303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-16DOI: 10.1124/pharmrev.124.001062
Gunnar Schulte
The class F of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) consists of 10 Frizzleds (FZD1-10) and Smoothened (SMO). FZDs bind and are activated by secreted lipoglycoproteins of the Wingless/Int-1 (WNT) family, and SMO is indirectly activated by the Hedgehog (Hh) family of morphogens acting on the transmembrane protein Patched. The advance of our understanding of FZDs and SMO as dynamic transmembrane receptors and molecular machines, which emerged during the past 14 years since the first-class F GPCR IUPHAR nomenclature report, justifies an update. This article focuses on the advances in molecular pharmacology and structural biology providing new mechanistic insight into ligand recognition, receptor activation mechanisms, signal initiation, and signal specification. Furthermore, class F GPCRs continue to develop as drug targets, and novel technologies and tools such as genetically encoded biosensors and CRISP/Cas9 edited cell systems have contributed to refined functional analysis of these receptors. Also, advances in crystal structure analysis and cryogenic electron microscopy contribute to the rapid development of our knowledge about structure-function relationships, providing a great starting point for drug development. Despite the progress, questions and challenges remain to fully understand the complexity of the WNT/FZD and Hh/SMO signaling systems. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The recent years of research have brought about substantial functional and structural insight into mechanisms of activation of Frizzleds and Smoothened. While the advance furthers our mechanistic understanding of ligand recognition, receptor activation, signal specification, and initiation, broader opportunities emerge that allow targeting class F GPCRs for therapy and regenerative medicine employing both biologics and small molecule compounds.
F 类 G 蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)由十个 Frizzleds(FZD1-10)和 Smoothened(SMO)组成。FZDs与Wingless/Int-1(WNT)家族分泌的脂糖蛋白结合并被激活,SMO则被作用于跨膜蛋白Patched(PTCH)的形态发生因子Hedgehog(Hh)家族间接激活。自第一份 F 类 GPCR IUPHAR 命名报告发布以来的 14 年间,我们对 FZDs 和 SMO 作为动态跨膜受体和分子机器的认识不断进步,因此有必要对其进行更新。本文重点介绍分子药理学和结构生物学方面的进展,这些进展为配体识别、受体激活机制、信号启动和信号规范提供了新的机制认识。此外,F 类 GPCR 继续发展成为药物靶点,基因编码生物传感器和 CRISP/Cas9 编辑细胞系统等新技术和工具也有助于对这些受体进行精细的功能分析。此外,晶体结构分析和低温电子显微镜技术的进步也促进了我们对结构-功能关系知识的快速发展,为药物开发提供了一个很好的起点。尽管取得了这些进展,但要全面了解 WNT/FZD 和 Hh/SMO 信号系统的复杂性,仍然存在问题和挑战。意义声明 近年来的研究从功能和结构上深入了解了 Frizzleds 和 Smoothened 的激活机制。这些进展进一步加深了我们对配体识别、受体激活、信号规范和启动的机理认识,同时也带来了更广泛的机遇,使我们能够利用生物制剂和小分子化合物,针对 F 类 GPCRs 进行治疗和再生医学研究。
{"title":"International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology CXV: The Class F of G Protein-Coupled Receptors.","authors":"Gunnar Schulte","doi":"10.1124/pharmrev.124.001062","DOIUrl":"10.1124/pharmrev.124.001062","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The class F of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) consists of 10 Frizzleds (FZD<sub>1-10</sub>) and Smoothened (SMO). FZDs bind and are activated by secreted lipoglycoproteins of the Wingless/Int-1 (WNT) family, and SMO is indirectly activated by the Hedgehog (Hh) family of morphogens acting on the transmembrane protein Patched. The advance of our understanding of FZDs and SMO as dynamic transmembrane receptors and molecular machines, which emerged during the past 14 years since the first-class F GPCR IUPHAR nomenclature report, justifies an update. This article focuses on the advances in molecular pharmacology and structural biology providing new mechanistic insight into ligand recognition, receptor activation mechanisms, signal initiation, and signal specification. Furthermore, class F GPCRs continue to develop as drug targets, and novel technologies and tools such as genetically encoded biosensors and CRISP/Cas9 edited cell systems have contributed to refined functional analysis of these receptors. Also, advances in crystal structure analysis and cryogenic electron microscopy contribute to the rapid development of our knowledge about structure-function relationships, providing a great starting point for drug development. Despite the progress, questions and challenges remain to fully understand the complexity of the WNT/FZD and Hh/SMO signaling systems. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The recent years of research have brought about substantial functional and structural insight into mechanisms of activation of Frizzleds and Smoothened. While the advance furthers our mechanistic understanding of ligand recognition, receptor activation, signal specification, and initiation, broader opportunities emerge that allow targeting class F GPCRs for therapy and regenerative medicine employing both biologics and small molecule compounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":19780,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":19.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141492969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-16DOI: 10.1124/pharmrev.123.001111
Kambiz Hassanzadeh, Jun Liu, Santhosh Maddila, M Maral Mouradian
α-Synuclein (α-Syn) aggregation in Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites has emerged as a key pathogenetic feature in Parkinson's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and multiple system atrophy. Various factors, including posttranslational modifications (PTMs), can influence the propensity of α-Syn to misfold and aggregate. PTMs are biochemical modifications of a protein that occur during or after translation and are typically mediated by enzymes. PTMs modulate several characteristics of proteins including their structure, activity, localization, and stability. α-Syn undergoes various posttranslational modifications, including phosphorylation, ubiquitination, SUMOylation, acetylation, glycation, O-GlcNAcylation, nitration, oxidation, polyamination, arginylation, and truncation. Different PTMs of a protein can physically interact with one another or work together to influence a particular physiological or pathological feature in a process known as PTMs crosstalk. The development of detection techniques for the cooccurrence of PTMs in recent years has uncovered previously unappreciated mechanisms of their crosstalk. This has led to the emergence of evidence supporting an association between α-Syn PTMs crosstalk and synucleinopathies. In this review, we provide a comprehensive evaluation of α-Syn PTMs, their impact on misfolding and pathogenicity, the pharmacological means of targeting them, and their potential as biomarkers of disease. We also highlight the importance of the crosstalk between these PTMs in α-Syn function and aggregation. Insight into these PTMS and the complexities of their crosstalk can improve our understanding of the pathogenesis of synucleinopathies and identify novel targets of therapeutic potential. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: α-Synuclein is a key pathogenic protein in Parkinson's disease and other synucleinopathies, making it a leading therapeutic target for disease modification. Multiple posttranslational modifications occur at various sites in α-Synuclein and alter its biophysical and pathological properties, some interacting with one another to add to the complexity of the pathogenicity of this protein. This review details these modifications, their implications in disease, and potential therapeutic opportunities.
{"title":"Posttranslational Modifications of <b>α</b>-Synuclein, Their Therapeutic Potential, and Crosstalk in Health and Neurodegenerative Diseases.","authors":"Kambiz Hassanzadeh, Jun Liu, Santhosh Maddila, M Maral Mouradian","doi":"10.1124/pharmrev.123.001111","DOIUrl":"10.1124/pharmrev.123.001111","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>α</i>-Synuclein (<i>α</i>-Syn) aggregation in Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites has emerged as a key pathogenetic feature in Parkinson's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and multiple system atrophy. Various factors, including posttranslational modifications (PTMs), can influence the propensity of <i>α</i>-Syn to misfold and aggregate. PTMs are biochemical modifications of a protein that occur during or after translation and are typically mediated by enzymes. PTMs modulate several characteristics of proteins including their structure, activity, localization, and stability. <i>α</i>-Syn undergoes various posttranslational modifications, including phosphorylation, ubiquitination, SUMOylation, acetylation, glycation, O-GlcNAcylation, nitration, oxidation, polyamination, arginylation, and truncation. Different PTMs of a protein can physically interact with one another or work together to influence a particular physiological or pathological feature in a process known as PTMs crosstalk. The development of detection techniques for the cooccurrence of PTMs in recent years has uncovered previously unappreciated mechanisms of their crosstalk. This has led to the emergence of evidence supporting an association between <i>α</i>-Syn PTMs crosstalk and synucleinopathies. In this review, we provide a comprehensive evaluation of <i>α</i>-Syn PTMs, their impact on misfolding and pathogenicity, the pharmacological means of targeting them, and their potential as biomarkers of disease. We also highlight the importance of the crosstalk between these PTMs in <i>α</i>-Syn function and aggregation. Insight into these PTMS and the complexities of their crosstalk can improve our understanding of the pathogenesis of synucleinopathies and identify novel targets of therapeutic potential. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: <i>α</i>-Synuclein is a key pathogenic protein in Parkinson's disease and other synucleinopathies, making it a leading therapeutic target for disease modification. Multiple posttranslational modifications occur at various sites in <i>α</i>-Synuclein and alter its biophysical and pathological properties, some interacting with one another to add to the complexity of the pathogenicity of this protein. This review details these modifications, their implications in disease, and potential therapeutic opportunities.</p>","PeriodicalId":19780,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":19.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142009195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-16DOI: 10.1124/pharmrev.124.001195
Christopher R Cederroth, Jonas Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen, Barbara Canlon
Hearing disorders pose significant challenges to individuals experiencing them and their overall quality of life, emphasizing the critical need for advanced pharmacological approaches to address these conditions. Current treatment options often focus on amplification devices, cochlear implants, or other rehabilitative therapies, leaving a substantial gap regarding effective pharmacological interventions. Advancements in our understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in hearing disorders induced by noise, aging, and ototoxicity have opened new avenues for drug development, some of which have led to numerous clinical trials, with promising results. The development of optimal drug delivery solutions in animals and humans can also enhance the targeted delivery of medications to the ear. Moreover, large genome studies contributing to a genetic understanding of hearing loss in humans combined with advanced molecular technologies in animal studies have shown a great potential to increase our understanding of the etiologies of hearing loss. The auditory system exhibits circadian rhythms and temporal variations in its physiology, its vulnerability to auditory insults, and its responsiveness to drug treatments. The cochlear clock rhythms are under the control of the glucocorticoid system, and preclinical evidence suggests that the risk/benefit profile of hearing disorder treatments using chronopharmacological approaches would be beneficial. If translatable to the bedside, such approaches may improve the outcome of clinical trials. Ongoing research into the molecular and genetic basis of auditory disorders, coupled with advancements in drug formulation and delivery as well as optimized timing of drug administration, holds great promise of more effective treatments. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Hearing disorders pose significant challenges to individuals and their overall quality of life, emphasizing the critical need for advanced pharmacological approaches to address these conditions. Ongoing research into the molecular and genetic basis of auditory disorders, coupled with advancements in drug delivery procedures and optimized timing of drug administration, holds the promise of more effective treatments.
{"title":"Pharmacological Approaches to Hearing Loss.","authors":"Christopher R Cederroth, Jonas Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen, Barbara Canlon","doi":"10.1124/pharmrev.124.001195","DOIUrl":"10.1124/pharmrev.124.001195","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hearing disorders pose significant challenges to individuals experiencing them and their overall quality of life, emphasizing the critical need for advanced pharmacological approaches to address these conditions. Current treatment options often focus on amplification devices, cochlear implants, or other rehabilitative therapies, leaving a substantial gap regarding effective pharmacological interventions. Advancements in our understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in hearing disorders induced by noise, aging, and ototoxicity have opened new avenues for drug development, some of which have led to numerous clinical trials, with promising results. The development of optimal drug delivery solutions in animals and humans can also enhance the targeted delivery of medications to the ear. Moreover, large genome studies contributing to a genetic understanding of hearing loss in humans combined with advanced molecular technologies in animal studies have shown a great potential to increase our understanding of the etiologies of hearing loss. The auditory system exhibits circadian rhythms and temporal variations in its physiology, its vulnerability to auditory insults, and its responsiveness to drug treatments. The cochlear clock rhythms are under the control of the glucocorticoid system, and preclinical evidence suggests that the risk/benefit profile of hearing disorder treatments using chronopharmacological approaches would be beneficial. If translatable to the bedside, such approaches may improve the outcome of clinical trials. Ongoing research into the molecular and genetic basis of auditory disorders, coupled with advancements in drug formulation and delivery as well as optimized timing of drug administration, holds great promise of more effective treatments. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Hearing disorders pose significant challenges to individuals and their overall quality of life, emphasizing the critical need for advanced pharmacological approaches to address these conditions. Ongoing research into the molecular and genetic basis of auditory disorders, coupled with advancements in drug delivery procedures and optimized timing of drug administration, holds the promise of more effective treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":19780,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":19.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142009196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-16DOI: 10.1124/pharmrev.124.000951
Luigino Calzetta, Clive Page, Maria Gabriella Matera, Mario Cazzola, Paola Rogliani
This review explores the concept of synergy in pharmacology, emphasizing its importance in optimizing treatment outcomes through the combination of drugs with different mechanisms of action. Synergy, defined as an effect greater than the expected additive effect elicited by individual agents according to specific predictive models, offers a promising approach to enhance therapeutic efficacy while minimizing adverse events. The historical evolution of synergy research, from ancient civilizations to modern pharmacology, highlights the ongoing quest to understand and harness synergistic interactions. Key concepts, such as concentration-response curves, additive effects, and predictive models, are discussed in detail, emphasizing the need for accurate assessment methods throughout translational drug development. Although various mathematical models exist for synergy analysis, selecting the appropriate model and software tools remains a challenge, necessitating careful consideration of experimental design and data interpretation. Furthermore, this review addresses practical considerations in synergy assessment, including preclinical and clinical approaches, mechanism of action, and statistical analysis. Optimizing synergy requires attention to concentration/dose ratios, target site localization, and timing of drug administration, ensuring that the benefits of combination therapy detected bench-side are translatable into clinical practice. Overall, the review advocates for a systematic approach to synergy assessment, incorporating robust statistical analysis, effective and simplified predictive models, and collaborative efforts across pivotal sectors, such as academic institutions, pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory agencies. By overcoming critical challenges and maximizing therapeutic potential, effective synergy assessment in drug development holds promise for advancing patient care. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Combining drugs with different mechanisms of action for synergistic interactions optimizes treatment efficacy and safety. Accurate interpretation of synergy requires the identification of the expected additive effect. Despite innovative models to predict the additive effect, consensus in drug-drug interactions research is lacking, hindering the bench-to-bedside development of combination therapies. Collaboration among science, industry, and regulation is crucial for advancing combination therapy development, ensuring rigorous application of predictive models in clinical settings.
{"title":"Drug-Drug Interactions and Synergy: From Pharmacological Models to Clinical Application.","authors":"Luigino Calzetta, Clive Page, Maria Gabriella Matera, Mario Cazzola, Paola Rogliani","doi":"10.1124/pharmrev.124.000951","DOIUrl":"10.1124/pharmrev.124.000951","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review explores the concept of synergy in pharmacology, emphasizing its importance in optimizing treatment outcomes through the combination of drugs with different mechanisms of action. Synergy, defined as an effect greater than the expected additive effect elicited by individual agents according to specific predictive models, offers a promising approach to enhance therapeutic efficacy while minimizing adverse events. The historical evolution of synergy research, from ancient civilizations to modern pharmacology, highlights the ongoing quest to understand and harness synergistic interactions. Key concepts, such as concentration-response curves, additive effects, and predictive models, are discussed in detail, emphasizing the need for accurate assessment methods throughout translational drug development. Although various mathematical models exist for synergy analysis, selecting the appropriate model and software tools remains a challenge, necessitating careful consideration of experimental design and data interpretation. Furthermore, this review addresses practical considerations in synergy assessment, including preclinical and clinical approaches, mechanism of action, and statistical analysis. Optimizing synergy requires attention to concentration/dose ratios, target site localization, and timing of drug administration, ensuring that the benefits of combination therapy detected bench-side are translatable into clinical practice. Overall, the review advocates for a systematic approach to synergy assessment, incorporating robust statistical analysis, effective and simplified predictive models, and collaborative efforts across pivotal sectors, such as academic institutions, pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory agencies. By overcoming critical challenges and maximizing therapeutic potential, effective synergy assessment in drug development holds promise for advancing patient care. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Combining drugs with different mechanisms of action for synergistic interactions optimizes treatment efficacy and safety. Accurate interpretation of synergy requires the identification of the expected additive effect. Despite innovative models to predict the additive effect, consensus in drug-drug interactions research is lacking, hindering the bench-to-bedside development of combination therapies. Collaboration among science, industry, and regulation is crucial for advancing combination therapy development, ensuring rigorous application of predictive models in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19780,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":19.3,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141620614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-15DOI: 10.1124/pharmrev.124.001271
Sophia K Heuser,Junjie Li,Silke Pudewell,Anthea LoBue,Zhixin Li,Miriam M Cortese-Krott
Arginase catalyzes the hydrolysis of L-arginine into L-ornithine and urea. The two existing isoforms Arg1 and Arg2 show different cellular localizations and metabolic functions. Arginase activity is crucial for nitrogen detoxification in the urea cycle, synthesis of polyamines, and control of l-arginine bioavailability and nitric oxide production. Despite significant progress in the understanding of the biochemistry and function of arginases, several open questions remain. Recent studies have revealed that the regulation and function of Arg1 and Arg2 are cell-type-specific, species-specific, and profoundly different in mice and humans. The main differences were found in the distribution and function of Arg1 and Arg2 in immune and erythroid cells. Contrary to what was previously thought, Arg1 activity appears to be only partially related to vascular NO signaling under homeostatic conditions in the vascular wall, but its expression is increased under disease conditions and may be targeted by treatment with arginase inhibitors. Arg2 appears to be mainly a catabolic enzyme involved in the synthesis of L-ornithine, polyamine, and proline but may play a putative role in blood pressure control, at least in mice. The immunosuppressive role of arginase-mediated arginine depletion is a promising target for cancer treatment. This review critically revises and discusses the biochemistry, pharmacology, and in vivo function of arginase, focusing on the insights gained from the analysis of cell-specific Arg1 and Arg2 knockout mice and human studies using arginase inhibitors or pegylated recombinant arginase. Significance Statement The review emphasizes the need for further research to deepen our understanding of the regulation of Arg1 and Arg 2 in different cell types under consideration of their localization, species-specificity, and multiple biochemical and physiological roles. This could lead to better pharmacological strategies to target arginase activity in liver, cardiovascular, hematological, immune/infection diseases and cancer.
{"title":"Biochemistry, pharmacology and in vivo function of arginases.","authors":"Sophia K Heuser,Junjie Li,Silke Pudewell,Anthea LoBue,Zhixin Li,Miriam M Cortese-Krott","doi":"10.1124/pharmrev.124.001271","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1124/pharmrev.124.001271","url":null,"abstract":"Arginase catalyzes the hydrolysis of L-arginine into L-ornithine and urea. The two existing isoforms Arg1 and Arg2 show different cellular localizations and metabolic functions. Arginase activity is crucial for nitrogen detoxification in the urea cycle, synthesis of polyamines, and control of l-arginine bioavailability and nitric oxide production. Despite significant progress in the understanding of the biochemistry and function of arginases, several open questions remain. Recent studies have revealed that the regulation and function of Arg1 and Arg2 are cell-type-specific, species-specific, and profoundly different in mice and humans. The main differences were found in the distribution and function of Arg1 and Arg2 in immune and erythroid cells. Contrary to what was previously thought, Arg1 activity appears to be only partially related to vascular NO signaling under homeostatic conditions in the vascular wall, but its expression is increased under disease conditions and may be targeted by treatment with arginase inhibitors. Arg2 appears to be mainly a catabolic enzyme involved in the synthesis of L-ornithine, polyamine, and proline but may play a putative role in blood pressure control, at least in mice. The immunosuppressive role of arginase-mediated arginine depletion is a promising target for cancer treatment. This review critically revises and discusses the biochemistry, pharmacology, and in vivo function of arginase, focusing on the insights gained from the analysis of cell-specific Arg1 and Arg2 knockout mice and human studies using arginase inhibitors or pegylated recombinant arginase. Significance Statement The review emphasizes the need for further research to deepen our understanding of the regulation of Arg1 and Arg 2 in different cell types under consideration of their localization, species-specificity, and multiple biochemical and physiological roles. This could lead to better pharmacological strategies to target arginase activity in liver, cardiovascular, hematological, immune/infection diseases and cancer.","PeriodicalId":19780,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":21.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142443713","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-15DOI: 10.1124/pharmrev.124.001297
Gema Mondejar-Parreño,Patricia Sanchez-Perez,Francisco Miguel Cruz,Jose Jalife
Arrhythmia refers to irregularities in the rate and rhythm of the heart, with symptoms spanning from mild palpitations to life-threatening arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). The complex molecular nature of arrhythmias complicates the selection of appropriate treatment. Current therapies involve the use of antiarrhythmic drugs (class I-IV) with limited efficacy and dangerous side effects and implantable pacemakers and cardioverter-defibrillators with hardware-related complications and inappropriate shocks. The number of novel antiarrhythmic drug in the development pipeline has decreased substantially during the last decade and underscores uncertainties regarding future developments in this field. Consequently, arrhythmia treatment poses significant challenges, prompting the need for alternative approaches. Remarkably, innovative drug discovery and development technologies show promise in helping advance antiarrhythmic therapies. Here, we review unique characteristics and the transformative potential of emerging technologies that offer unprecedented opportunities for transitioning from traditional antiarrhythmics to next-generation therapies. We assess stem cell technology, emphasizing the utility of innovative cell profiling using multi-omics, high-throughput screening, and advanced computational modeling in developing treatments tailored precisely to individual genetic and physiological profiles. We offer insights into gene therapy, peptide and peptibody approaches for drug delivery. We finally discuss potential strengths and weaknesses of such techniques in reducing adverse effects and enhancing overall treatment outcomes, leading to more effective, specific, and safer therapies. Altogether, this comprehensive overview introduces innovative avenues for personalized rhythm therapy, with particular emphasis on drug discovery, aiming to advance the arrhythmia treatment landscape and the prevention of SCD. Significance Statement Arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death account for 15-20% of deaths worldwide. However, current antiarrhythmic therapies are ineffective and with dangerous side effects. Here, we review the field of arrhythmia treatment underscoring the slow progress in advancing the cardiac rhythm therapy pipeline and the uncertainties regarding evolution of this field. We provide information on how emerging technological and experimental tools can help accelerate progress and address the limitations of antiarrhythmic drug discovery.
{"title":"Promising tools for future drug discovery and development in antiarrhythmic therapy.","authors":"Gema Mondejar-Parreño,Patricia Sanchez-Perez,Francisco Miguel Cruz,Jose Jalife","doi":"10.1124/pharmrev.124.001297","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1124/pharmrev.124.001297","url":null,"abstract":"Arrhythmia refers to irregularities in the rate and rhythm of the heart, with symptoms spanning from mild palpitations to life-threatening arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). The complex molecular nature of arrhythmias complicates the selection of appropriate treatment. Current therapies involve the use of antiarrhythmic drugs (class I-IV) with limited efficacy and dangerous side effects and implantable pacemakers and cardioverter-defibrillators with hardware-related complications and inappropriate shocks. The number of novel antiarrhythmic drug in the development pipeline has decreased substantially during the last decade and underscores uncertainties regarding future developments in this field. Consequently, arrhythmia treatment poses significant challenges, prompting the need for alternative approaches. Remarkably, innovative drug discovery and development technologies show promise in helping advance antiarrhythmic therapies. Here, we review unique characteristics and the transformative potential of emerging technologies that offer unprecedented opportunities for transitioning from traditional antiarrhythmics to next-generation therapies. We assess stem cell technology, emphasizing the utility of innovative cell profiling using multi-omics, high-throughput screening, and advanced computational modeling in developing treatments tailored precisely to individual genetic and physiological profiles. We offer insights into gene therapy, peptide and peptibody approaches for drug delivery. We finally discuss potential strengths and weaknesses of such techniques in reducing adverse effects and enhancing overall treatment outcomes, leading to more effective, specific, and safer therapies. Altogether, this comprehensive overview introduces innovative avenues for personalized rhythm therapy, with particular emphasis on drug discovery, aiming to advance the arrhythmia treatment landscape and the prevention of SCD. Significance Statement Arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death account for 15-20% of deaths worldwide. However, current antiarrhythmic therapies are ineffective and with dangerous side effects. Here, we review the field of arrhythmia treatment underscoring the slow progress in advancing the cardiac rhythm therapy pipeline and the uncertainties regarding evolution of this field. We provide information on how emerging technological and experimental tools can help accelerate progress and address the limitations of antiarrhythmic drug discovery.","PeriodicalId":19780,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":21.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142443712","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-15DOI: 10.1124/pharmrev.124.001049
Roman Tremmel,Daniel Hübschmann,Elke Schaeffeler,Sebastian Pirmann,Stefan Fröhling,Matthias Schwab
Precision cancer medicine is widely established, and numerous molecularly targeted drugs for various tumor entities are approved or in development. Personalized pharmacotherapy in oncology has so far been based primarily on tumor characteristics, e.g., somatic mutations. However, the response to drug treatment also depends on pharmacological processes summarized under the term ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion). Variations in ADME genes have been the subject of intensive research for more than five decades, considering individual patients' genetic makeup, referred to as pharmacogenomics (PGx). The combined impact of a patient's tumor and germline genome is only partially understood and often not adequately considered in cancer therapy. This may be attributed, in part, to the lack of methods for combined analysis of both data layers. Optimized personalized cancer therapies should, therefore, aim to integrate molecular information about the tumor and the germline, taking into account existing PGx guidelines for drug therapy. Moreover, such strategies should provide the opportunity to consider genetic variants of previously unknown functional significance. Bioinformatic analysis methods and corresponding algorithms for data interpretation need to be developed to consider PGx data in interdisciplinary molecular tumor boards, where cancer patients are discussed to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical management based on individual tumor profiles. Significance Statement The era of personalized oncology has seen the emergence of drugs tailored to genetic variants associated with cancer biology. However, full potential of targeted therapy remains untapped due to the predominant focus on acquired tumor-specific alterations. Optimized cancer care must integrate tumor and patient genomes, guided by pharmacogenomic principles. An essential prerequisite for realizing truly personalized drug treatment of cancer patients is the development of bioinformatic tools for comprehensive analysis of all data layers generated in modern precision oncology programs.
{"title":"Innovation in cancer pharmacotherapy through integrative consideration of germline and tumor genomes.","authors":"Roman Tremmel,Daniel Hübschmann,Elke Schaeffeler,Sebastian Pirmann,Stefan Fröhling,Matthias Schwab","doi":"10.1124/pharmrev.124.001049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1124/pharmrev.124.001049","url":null,"abstract":"Precision cancer medicine is widely established, and numerous molecularly targeted drugs for various tumor entities are approved or in development. Personalized pharmacotherapy in oncology has so far been based primarily on tumor characteristics, e.g., somatic mutations. However, the response to drug treatment also depends on pharmacological processes summarized under the term ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion). Variations in ADME genes have been the subject of intensive research for more than five decades, considering individual patients' genetic makeup, referred to as pharmacogenomics (PGx). The combined impact of a patient's tumor and germline genome is only partially understood and often not adequately considered in cancer therapy. This may be attributed, in part, to the lack of methods for combined analysis of both data layers. Optimized personalized cancer therapies should, therefore, aim to integrate molecular information about the tumor and the germline, taking into account existing PGx guidelines for drug therapy. Moreover, such strategies should provide the opportunity to consider genetic variants of previously unknown functional significance. Bioinformatic analysis methods and corresponding algorithms for data interpretation need to be developed to consider PGx data in interdisciplinary molecular tumor boards, where cancer patients are discussed to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical management based on individual tumor profiles. Significance Statement The era of personalized oncology has seen the emergence of drugs tailored to genetic variants associated with cancer biology. However, full potential of targeted therapy remains untapped due to the predominant focus on acquired tumor-specific alterations. Optimized cancer care must integrate tumor and patient genomes, guided by pharmacogenomic principles. An essential prerequisite for realizing truly personalized drug treatment of cancer patients is the development of bioinformatic tools for comprehensive analysis of all data layers generated in modern precision oncology programs.","PeriodicalId":19780,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":21.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142443711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}