Pharmacological Reviews最新文献

The carnitine palmitoyltransferases (CPTs) play a key role in controlling the oxidation of long-chain fatty acids and are potential therapeutic targets for diseases with a strong metabolic component, such as obesity, diabetes, and cancer. Four distinct proteins are CPT1A, CPT1B, CPT1C, and CPT2, differing in tissue expression and catalytic activity. CPT1s are finely regulated by malonyl-CoA, a metabolite whose intracellular levels reflect the cell's nutritional state. Although CPT1C does not exhibit significant catalytic activity, it is capable of modulating the functioning of other neuronal proteins. Structurally, all CPTs share a Y-shaped catalytic tunnel that allows the entry of 2 substrates and accommodation of the acyl group in a hydrophobic pocket. Several molecules targeting these enzymes have been described, some showing potential in normalizing blood glucose levels in diabetic patients, and others that, through a central mechanism, are anorexigenic and enhance energy expenditure. However, given the critical roles that CPTs play in certain tissues, such as the heart, liver, and brain, it is essential to fully understand the differences between the various isoforms. We analyze in detail the structure of these proteins, their cellular and physiological functions, and their potential as therapeutic targets in diseases such as obesity, diabetes, and cancer. We also describe drugs identified to date as having inhibitory or activating capabilities for these proteins. This knowledge will support the design of new drugs specific to each isoform, and the development of nanomedicines that can selectively target particular tissues or cells. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Carnitine palmitoyltransferase (CPT) proteins, as gatekeepers of fatty acid oxidation, have great potential as pharmacological targets to treat metabolic diseases like obesity, diabetes, and cancer. In recent years, significant progress has been made in understanding the 3-dimensional structure of CPTs and their pathophysiological functions. A deeper understanding of the differences between the various CPT family members will enable the design of selective drugs and therapeutic approaches with fewer side effects.

The Hippo signaling pathway is a highly conserved signaling network for controlling organ size, tissue homeostasis, and regeneration. It integrates a wide range of intracellular and extracellular signals, such as cellular energy status, cell density, hormonal signals, and mechanical cues, to modulate the activity of YAP/TAZ transcriptional coactivators. A key aspect of Hippo pathway regulation involves its spatial organization at the plasma membrane, where upstream regulators localize to specific membrane subdomains to regulate the assembly and activation of the pathway components. This spatial organization is critical for the precise control of Hippo signaling, as it dictates the dynamic interactions between pathway components and their regulators. Recent studies have also uncovered the role of biomolecular condensation in regulating Hippo signaling, adding complexity to its control mechanisms. Dysregulation of the Hippo pathway is implicated in various pathological conditions, particularly cancer, where alterations in YAP/TAZ activity contribute to tumorigenesis and drug resistance. Therapeutic strategies targeting the Hippo pathway have shown promise in both cancer treatment, by inhibiting YAP/TAZ signaling, and regenerative medicine, by enhancing YAP/TAZ activity to promote tissue repair. The development of small molecule inhibitors targeting the YAP-TEAD interaction and other upstream regulators offers new avenues for therapeutic intervention. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The Hippo signaling pathway is a key regulator of organ size, tissue homeostasis, and regeneration, with its dysregulation linked to diseases such as cancer. Understanding this pathway opens new possibilities for therapeutic approaches in regenerative medicine and oncology, with the potential to translate basic research into improved clinical outcomes.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD; formerly known as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease) is a chronic liver disease affecting over a billion individuals worldwide. MASLD can gradually develop into more severe liver pathologies, including metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), cirrhosis, and liver malignancy. Notably, although being a global health problem, there are very limited therapeutic options against MASLD and its related diseases. While a thyroid hormone receptor agonist (resmetirom) is recently approved for MASH treatment, other efforts to control these diseases remain unsatisfactory. Given the projected rise in MASLD and MASH incidence, it is urgent to develop novel and effective therapeutic strategies against these prevalent liver diseases. In this article, the pathogenic mechanisms of MASLD and MASH, including insulin resistance, dysregulated nuclear receptor signaling, and genetic risk factors (eg, patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing 3 and hydroxysteroid 17-β dehydrogenase-13), are introduced. Various therapeutic interventions against MASH are then explored, including approved medication (resmetirom), drugs that are currently in clinical trials (eg, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, fibroblast growth factor 21 analog, and PPAR agonist), and those failed in previous trials (eg, obeticholic acid and stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 antagonist). Moreover, given that the role of gut microbes in MASLD is increasingly acknowledged, alterations in the gut microbiota and microbial mechanisms in MASLD development are elucidated. Therapeutic approaches that target the gut microbiota (eg, dietary intervention and probiotics) against MASLD and related diseases are further explored. With better understanding of the multifaceted pathogenic mechanisms, the development of innovative therapeutics that target the root causes of MASLD and MASH is greatly facilitated. The possibility of alleviating MASH and achieving better patient outcomes is within reach. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is the most common chronic liver disease worldwide, and it can progress to more severe pathologies, including steatohepatitis, cirrhosis, and liver cancer. Better understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms of these diseases has facilitated the development of innovative therapeutic strategies. Moreover, increasing evidence has illustrated the crucial role of gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of MASLD and related diseases. It may be clinically feasible to target gut microbes to alleviate MASLD in the future.

After a century of extensive scientific investigations, there is still no curative or disease-modifying treatment available that can provide long-lasting remission for patients diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Although T1D has historically been regarded as a classic autoimmune disorder targeting and destroying pancreatic islet β-cells, significant research has recently demonstrated that β-cells themselves also play a substantial role in the disease's progression, which could explain some of the unfavorable clinical outcomes. We offer a thorough review of scientific and clinical insights pertaining to molecular mechanisms behind pathogenesis and the different therapeutic interventions in T1D covering over 20 possible pharmaceutical intervention treatments. The interventions are categorized as immune therapies, treatments targeting islet endocrine dysfunctions, medications with dual modes of action in immune and islet endocrine cells, and combination treatments with a broader spectrum of activity. We suggest that these collective findings can provide a valuable platform to discover new combinatorial synergies in search of the curative disease-modifying intervention for T1D. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This research delves into the underlying causes of T1D and identifies critical mechanisms governing β-cell function in both healthy and diseased states. Thus, we identify specific pathways that could be manipulated by existing or new pharmacological interventions. These interventions fall into several categories: (1) immunomodifying therapies individually targeting immune cell processes, (2) interventions targeting β-cells, (3) compounds that act simultaneously on both immune cell and β-cell pathways, and (4) combinations of compounds simultaneously targeting immune and β-cell pathways.

Gastroparesis is a neurogastrointestinal disorder of motility in which patients experience symptoms of nausea, vomiting, bloating, early satiety, postprandial fullness, upper abdominal discomfort or pain, and delayed gastric emptying of solids based on scintigraphy or stable isotope breath test when mechanical obstruction has been excluded. Symptoms of gastroparesis may result from diverse pathophysiological mechanisms, including antroduodenal hypomotility, pylorospasm, increased gastric accommodation, and visceral hypersensitivity. The most common etiologies of gastroparesis are idiopathic, diabetic, and postsurgical, and less frequent causes are neurodegenerative disorders (Parkinson's disease), myopathies (scleroderma, amyloidosis), medication-induced (glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists and opioid agents), and paraneoplastic syndrome. This review addresses pharmacologic management of gastroparesis including prokinetic and antiemetic agents, pharmacologic agents targeting the pylorus, and effects of neuromodulators. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Gastroparesis is a neurogastrointestinal motility disorder characterized by delayed gastric emptying without mechanical obstruction with numerous upper gastrointestinal symptoms, including nausea and vomiting. The management of gastroparesis involves nutritional support, medications, and procedures. The only Food and Drug Administration-approved medication for gastroparesis is metoclopramide. This article reviews the pharmacology and efficacy of all classes of antiemetics or prokinetic effects used in gastroparesis. There is still a considerable unmet need for efficacious medications specifically for the treatment of gastroparesis, especially in refractory cases.

Cancer is a systemic manifestation of aberrant cell cycle activity and dysregulated cell growth. Genetic mutations can determine tumor onset by either augmenting cell division rates or restraining normal controls such as cell cycle arrest or apoptosis. As a result, tumor cells not only undergo uncontrolled cell division but also become compromised in their ability to exit the cell cycle accurately. Regulation of cell cycle progression is enabled by specific surveillance mechanisms known as cell cycle checkpoints, and aberrations in these signaling pathways often culminate in cancer. For instance, DNA damage checkpoints, which preclude the generation and augmentation of DNA damage in the G1, S, and G2 cell cycle phases, are often defective in cancer cells, allowing cell division in spite of the accumulation of genetic errors. Notably, tumors have evolved to become dependent on checkpoints for their survival. For example, checkpoint pathways such as the DNA replication stress checkpoint and the mitotic checkpoint rarely undergo mutations and remain intact because any aberrant activity could result in irreparable damage or catastrophic chromosomal missegregation leading to cell death. In this review, we initially focus on cell cycle control pathways and specific functions of checkpoint signaling involved in normal and cancer cells and then proceed to examine how cell cycle control and checkpoint mechanisms can provide new therapeutic windows that can be exploited for cancer therapy. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: DNA damage checkpoints are often defective in cancer cells, allowing cell division in spite of the accumulation of genetic errors. Conversely, DNA replication stress and mitotic checkpoints rarely undergo mutations because any aberrant activity could result in irreparable damage or catastrophic chromosomal missegregation, leading to cancer cell death. This review focuses on the checkpoint signaling mechanisms involved in cancer cells and how an emerging understanding of these pathways can provide new therapeutic opportunities for cancer therapy.