Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety最新文献

Purpose: Galcanezumab is a calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody indicated for migraine prevention in adults. Due to the long half-life of galcanezumab and the prevalence of migraine in women of childbearing age, galcanezumab exposure may occur during pregnancy. However, real-world use and safety of galcanezumab during pregnancy has not been fully described. To help fill this gap, galcanezumab has two ongoing pregnancy safety studies, one of which is an insurance claims database study.

Methods: This database study is actively identifying and following pregnancies exposed to galcanezumab using commercial claims from the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD). Patient accrual is planned from September 2018 to June 2026, with a final study report planned for December 2027. This study requires 430 galcanezumab-exposed pregnancies with linked infants to reach power for comparative analysis of major congenital malformations.

Results: Recent monitoring of patient accrual, including data from 28 September 2018 to 31 January 2023, identified 207 galcanezumab-exposed pregnancies in women with migraine in the HIRD, of which 110 were live births and 73 of which were linked to an infant. This represents an annual accrual rate of approximately 17 pregnancies linked to infants, which is substantially lower than the 55 required annually to reach target size within current regulatory-committed study timelines.

Conclusions: The accrual of a sufficient number of galcanezumab-exposed pregnancies represents a substantial, but not uncommon, barrier to conducting comparative analyses in pregnancy studies. Potential solutions that would allow for timely dissemination of important safety information to patients and providers may be available.

Purpose: Japanese traditional (Kampo) medicines are often used for pregnant women in Japan. However, no comprehensive studies have been conducted regarding the self-reported use of these medicines during pregnancy. This study investigated the use of Kampo medicines during pregnancy in Japan using the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study (TMM BirThree Cohort Study).

Methods: Questionnaires were distributed to pregnant women participating in the TMM BirThree Cohort Study (July 2013 to March 2017) at approximately 12 weeks (early pregnancy) and 26 weeks (middle pregnancy). We analysed Kampo medicines use over three periods: (1) 12 months before pregnancy diagnosis, (2) the period between pregnancy diagnosis and around Week 12 of pregnancy and (3) from around Week 12 of pregnancy.

Results: In total, 19 220 women were included in the analysis. The proportions using prescribed Kampo medicines were 4.1% before pregnancy diagnosis, 4.5% from diagnosis to Week 12% and 4.5% after Week 12 of pregnancy. The most frequently prescribed Kampo medicines were tokishakuyakusan (1.0%) before pregnancy diagnosis, shoseiryuto (1.3%) from diagnosis to Week 12 and shoseiryuto (1.5%) Post-week 12. Sixty of the pregnant women used Kampo medicines containing crude drugs, which should be administered cautiously during pregnancy.

Conclusion: The proportion of Kampo medicines use before and during pregnancy was 4%-5%. Some pregnant women used Kampo medicines containing crude drugs that should be administered cautiously during pregnancy. Further research is required to determine the safety of Kampo medicines during pregnancy.

Purpose: The evidence of the neuropsychiatric effects associated with fluoroquinolones is mainly supported by case reports. Population-based evidence remains largely limited. We aimed to investigate the association between the use of fluoroquinolones and hospitalization or Accident & Emergency department visits for acute neuropsychiatric events using a self-controlled case series (SCCS) and active comparator to reduce confounding.

Methods: We conducted a SCCS with a recently described active comparator design using all public outpatient clinics, hospitalization, and Accident and Emergency department records from the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System, Hong Kong from 2001 to 2013. Among 166 325 people with an oral fluoroquinolone prescription, 4287 people who had an incident neuropsychiatric event were included. We then estimated the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of acute neuropsychiatric events during periods before and after fluoroquinolone prescription, versus baseline. We repeated the analysis for amoxicillin/clavulanic acid users as an active comparator. We then estimated the comparator-adjusted estimates by dividing the IRR for fluoroquinolone by the IRR for amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. The primary outcome was neuropsychiatric events. Secondary outcomes were psychotic events and cognitive impairment.

Results: An increased risk of neuropsychiatric events was observed in the current use of fluoroquinolone [IRR: 2.11 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.58-2.83)] and 1-7 days after the end of fluoroquinolone prescription [IRR: 1.90 (95% CI: 1.30-2.75)] versus baseline. No increased risk was observed in other risk periods versus baseline. Similar patterns were observed in the current use of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid [IRR: 1.92 (95% CI: 1.19-3.11)] and 1-7 days after the end of fluoroquinolone prescription [IRR: 1.81 (95% CI: 1.11-2.97)] versus baseline. Similar results were found for secondary outcomes. Using the active comparator design, comparator-adjusted estimates were 1.10 (95% CI: 0.63-1.93) in current use of fluoroquinolones and 1.05 (95% CI: 0.57-1.95) in 1-7 days postexposure to fluoroquinolones versus baseline.

Conclusions: Although our study showed a higher incidence of neuropsychiatric events in the current use of fluoroquinolones and 7 days after the end of fluoroquinolones prescriptions compared with baseline, a similar temporal pattern was also found for amoxicillin/clavulanic acid users. Using amoxicillin/clavulanic acid as the active comparator, we found no difference in the risk of neuropsychiatric events associated with fluoroquinolone compared with baseline. Therefore, the risk of neuropsychiatric events may not need to influence the decision to prescribe either fluoroquinolones or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid based on the evidence in this study.

Purpose: Upadacitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, has been approved by the FDA to treat various autoimmune conditions. This study assessed its adverse events by analyzing reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods: FAERS data from Q3 2019 to Q4 2023 were extracted, and disproportionality analyses were conducted using four statistical measures, reporting odds ratio, proportionate reporting ratio, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and empirical Bayesian geometric mean.

Results: A total of 6 879 398 adverse event reports were collected, with 37 700 reports identifying upadacitinib as the "primary suspected." These reports involved 24 system organ classes and 246 preferred terms that met the criteria across all four algorithms. The distribution of adverse events was assessed separately for female and male patients. Further analysis of the top 25 preferred terms revealed that, although the system organ classes were similar between sexes, the specific adverse events differed. The adverse events were analyzed by gender, showing musculoskeletal and skin disorders were prevalent and severe in male patients, while musculoskeletal issues, infections, and abnormal laboratory tests were common in female patients. Unexpected events like trigger finger, biliary sepsis, and serious events such as oral neoplasm were also identified.

Conclusion: This study provides real-world evidence for the safety evaluation of upadacitinib and underscores the need to monitor sex-specific adverse events. Future prospective studies are necessary to confirm these pharmacovigilance findings.

Purpose: To analyze the prescription patterns and sociodemographic factors associated with the use of antipsychotic, antidepressant, and antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy in Belgium, and to investigate their potential association with congenital anomalies.

Methods: Using a nationwide linked database, we identified antidepressants, antipsychotics, and antiepileptics via the Anatomical Therapeutic and Chemical Classification (ATC) codes. For each medication group, we calculated the overall prevalence and prevalence for the three most used medications at the fifth ATC level. Sociodemographic factors influencing medication use during pregnancy were analyzed, and potential associations with congenital anomalies were investigated through logistic regression models based on generalized estimating equations.

Results: Overall, 828 016 live births pregnancies associated with 611 094 mothers were identified. We found that the use of antidepressants, antipsychotics, and antiepileptics was decreasing with the arrival of pregnancy. Mothers with a less favorable sociodemographic status were more likely to be exposed to these medications. Antiepileptics used in the first trimester were associated with an increased risk of congenital anomalies (aOR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.11-2.45) compared with unexposed women. The three most used antiepileptics were lamotrigine, valproate, and levetiracetam, among them, we found an association with congenital anomalies only for valproate (aOR = 3.92, 95% CI 2.30-6.67).

Conclusions: Psychotropic and antiepileptic drug use decreased during pregnancy. Pregnant women with a less favorable sociodemographic status were more likely to be exposed to psychotropics and antiepileptics during pregnancy. The elevated risk of congenital anomalies associated with antiepileptics use, particularly valproate, underscores the need for targeted interventions and increased awareness to improve maternal and fetal health outcomes.

Purpose: We aimed to investigate the awareness of oral retinoid teratogenicity and the adherence to the pregnancy prevention program (PPP) related to oral retinoid use by physicians, pharmacists, and patients in Denmark.

Methods: As part of the multi-country survey, web-based questionnaires were distributed among Danish dermatologists, general practitioners, community pharmacists, and women of childbearing age, who were using or had used oral retinoids within the past 5 years.

Results: A total of 62 physicians, 96 pharmacists, and 50 oral retinoid using women responded; 95%, 100%, and 98%, respectively, were aware of the teratogenic risks of oral retinoids. For physicians, the most applied PPP measures were the usage of the patient (44%) and the healthcare professional (19%) guides, while the least applied measure was signing medication risk awareness form (3%). Among the pharmacists, the warning sign on the outer medication package was the most used measure (45%). Among the women, a majority (90%) had read the patient information leaflet included in the medication package and 72% discussed the use of contraception with their healthcare provider, while risk awareness forms and patient cards were seen by only few.

Conclusions: In Denmark, physicians, pharmacists, and medicine users were aware about the teratogenic effects of oral retinoids. Adherence to pregnancy prevention measures varied, suggesting unwillingness to use the measures that require patients' signatures among physicians and a lack of awareness of pharmacy targeting measures. Accessibility of the latter measures need to be optimized to improve the safety of oral retinoid use.

Purpose: The optimal design for pharmacoepidemiologic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) studies is unclear. Using the association between concomitant use of sulfonylureas and warfarin and the risk of severe hypoglycemia as a case study, a DDI with little or no clinical impact, we tested whether the prevalent new-user design can be applied in the area.

Methods: Among all patients initiating sulfonylureas in the UK's Clinical Practice Research Datalink (1998-2020), we identified those adding-on warfarin while on a sulfonylurea. For each co-exposed patient, we defined a prescription-based exposure set including other sulfonylurea users not adding-on warfarin (comparators). Within each exposure set, we matched each co-exposed patient to five comparators on time-conditional propensity scores (TCPS) and followed them using an as-treated approach. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of severe hypoglycemia associated with concomitant use of sulfonylureas and warfarin compared to use of sulfonylureas alone. Sensitivity analyses addressed the impact of different potential sources of bias.

Results: The study cohort included 17 890 patients co-exposed to sulfonylureas and warfarin and 88 749 matched comparators. After TCPS matching, patient characteristics were well-balanced between groups. Compared to use of sulfonylureas alone, concomitant use of sulfonylureas and warfarin was not associated with the risk of severe hypoglycemia (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92-1.17). Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary analysis (HRs ranging from 1.01 to 1.15, all not statistically significant).

Conclusions: Our study suggests that the prevalent new-user design could be used for the assessment of clinical effects of DDIs.

Purpose: On August 20, 2020, the United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a Drug Safety Communication (DSC) along with labeling updates to inform the public about a small increased risk of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) associated with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) use. This study aims to assess whether the DSC impacted HCTZ use in the U.S.

Methods: We conducted a trend analysis in the Sentinel Distributed Database using national healthcare administrative data from January 2017 to November 2022. We identified two cohorts each month: An overall cohort of all enrollees and a skin cancer cohort of those with a history of NMSC. For each cohort, we plotted the monthly proportion of patients receiving HCTZ-containing products among those receiving any thiazide diuretics. We performed interrupted time series analyses to quantify the impact of the DSC on these monthly proportions. Secondary analyses were conducted on the proportion of HCTZ users among patients receiving any antihypertensives.

Results: In the overall cohort, the DSC was only associated with a statistically significant but clinically negligible trend change of monthly HCTZ proportion within this cohort (0.018%; 95% CI, 0.012%-0.025%). Similar results were observed in the skin cancer cohort. The secondary analysis found no significant level change or trend change in the monthly proportion of HCTZ use among antihypertensive users.

Conclusions: We did not observe significant changes in HCTZ use following the DSC about its NMSC risk, among the overall population and those with a history of NMSC. Our findings were in accordance with the DSC recommendation.

Purpose: Prior approval for reimbursement is a policy of cost containment while ensuring oversight and governance of medicines. It has been employed in Ireland to address financial challenges due to the shift from warfarin to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Studies assessing the effectiveness of this policy are limited. Thus, we aimed to examine the effectiveness of prior approval for reimbursement of DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban) as a cost containment policy in Ireland.

Methods: The Irish Health Service Executive-Primary Care Reimbursement Service database was used in this cross-sectional study. We examined the prescribing frequencies and associated costs of the oral anticoagulants; [(OACs) apixaban, rivaroxaban and warfarin] listed in the top 100 most frequently prescribed drugs, between 2018 and 2021. Time series negative binomial regression was used to assess the impact of removing the approval requirement of apixaban in September 2019 followed by the other DOACs in November 2020.

Results: The prescribing frequency of OACs increased by almost 20% from 2018 to 2021. This study showed there were significant differences in the proportion of OACs prescribed among the Community Drug Schemes. A statistically significant decreased use of apixaban (< 1%, p < 0.05) occurred when prior approval was removed for all DOACs.

Conclusions: The removal of prior approval for reimbursement of DOACs in Ireland had a minimal impact on the prescribing frequency trends of the OACs. Future use of these potentially useful policies by healthcare systems requires careful consideration of drug type, approval criteria and length of time the policy remains in place to minimise any negative effects associated with their use.