Pediatric Drugs最新文献

Opioid therapy is the mainstay for managing pain in pediatric oncology. This narrative review describes the current literature regarding opioids for pediatric cancer pain. The review explores the multifaceted landscape of opioid utilization in this population, including the role of opioids in certain clinical circumstances, modalities of opioid delivery, unique opioids, outpatient and at-home pain management strategies, and other key concepts such as breakthrough pain. This review highlights the importance of individualized dosing and multimodal approaches to enhance efficacy and minimize adverse effects. Drawing from a wide range of evidence, this review offers insights to optimize pediatric oncology pain management.

Background: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is one of the leading causes of death. Safe and timely medical interventions, especially in children, can prolong their survival. The drugs prescribed for children with CHD are mainly based on the outcomes of drug therapy in adults with cardiovascular diseases, and their adverse drug reactions (ADRs) might be different. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate ADRs in children with CHD.

Methods: This was a scoping review conducted in 2023. PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, Ovid, ProQuest, and Google Scholar databases were searched. All studies that reported ADRs for children with CHD and were published in English by 1 November 2023 were included in this study. Finally, the results were reported using a content analysis method.

Results: A total of 87 articles were included in the study. The results showed that symptoms/signs/clinical findings, and cardiovascular disorders were the most common ADRs reported in children with CHD. The results also showed that most of the ADRs were reported for prostaglandin E1, amiodarone, prostaglandin E2, dexmedetomidine, and captopril, respectively.

Conclusion: The review underscores the wide array of ADRs in children with CHD, particularly in antiarrhythmics, diuretics, beta-blockers, anticoagulants, and vasodilators, which affected cardiovascular, respiratory, endocrine, metabolic, genitourinary, gastrointestinal, and musculoskeletal systems. Tailored treatment is imperative, considering individual patient characteristics, especially in the vulnerable groups. Further research is essential for optimizing dosing, pharmacogenetics, and alternative therapies to enhance patient outcomes in CHD management.

Pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic, potentially debilitating psychiatric condition. Although effective treatments exist, at least 10% of youth do not achieve remission despite receiving first-line treatments. This article reviews the extant, albeit limited, evidence supporting treatment approaches for youth with treatment-resistant OCD. A literature search for articles addressing pediatric treatment-resistant OCD was conducted through April 11, 2024. These results were augmented by searching for treatment-resistant OCD in adults; treatment strategies discovered for the adult population were then searched in the context of children and adolescents. In general, intensive treatment programs and antipsychotic augmentation of an antidepressant had the most substantial and consistent evidence base for treatment-resistant youth with OCD, although studies were limited and of relatively poor methodological quality (i.e., open trials, naturalistic studies). Several pharmacological approaches (clomipramine, antipsychotics [e.g., aripiprazole, risperidone], riluzole, ketamine, D-cycloserine, memantine, topiramate, N-acetylcysteine, ondansetron), largely based on supporting data among adults, have received varying levels of investigation and support. There is nascent support for how to treat pediatric treatment-resistant OCD. Future treatment studies need to consider how to manage the significant minority of youth who fail to benefit from first-line treatment approaches.

The widespread use of drugs for unapproved purposes remains common in children, primarily attributable to practical, ethical, and financial constraints associated with pediatric drug research. Pharmacometrics, the scientific discipline that involves the application of mathematical models to understand and quantify drug effects, holds promise in advancing pediatric pharmacotherapy by expediting drug development, extending applications, and personalizing dosing. In this review, we delineate the principles of pharmacometrics, and explore its clinical applications and prospects. The fundamental aspect of any pharmacometric analysis lies in the selection of appropriate methods for quantifying pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Population pharmacokinetic modeling is a data-driven method ('top-down' approach) to approximate population-level pharmacokinetic parameters, while identifying factors contributing to inter-individual variability. Model-informed precision dosing is increasingly used to leverage population pharmacokinetic models and patient data, to formulate individualized dosing recommendations. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic models integrate physicochemical drug properties with biological parameters ('bottom-up approach'), and is particularly valuable in situations with limited clinical data, such as early drug development, assessing drug-drug interactions, or adapting dosing for patients with specific comorbidities. The effective implementation of these complex models hinges on strong collaboration between clinicians and pharmacometricians, given the pivotal role of data availability. Promising advancements aimed at improving data availability encompass innovative techniques such as opportunistic sampling, minimally invasive sampling approaches, microdialysis, and in vitro investigations. Additionally, ongoing research efforts to enhance measurement instruments for evaluating pharmacodynamics responses, including biomarkers and clinical scoring systems, are expected to significantly bolster our capacity to understand drug effects in children.

Background and objective: Mast cells have been implicated in abdominal pain-associated disorders of gut-brain interaction, such as functional dyspepsia. As such, ketotifen, a second-generation antihistamine and mast cell stabilizer, could represent a viable treatment option in these conditions. The primary aim of the current pilot study was to assess clinical response to ketotifen and assess pharmacokinetics in youth with functional dyspepsia.

Methods: We conducted a pilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial of ketotifen in 11 youth with functional dyspepsia and duodenal mucosal eosinophilia with 4 weeks of active treatment at a dose of 1 mg twice daily. Global clinical response was graded on a 5-point Likert Scale. A single plasma sample was obtained at steady state for pharmacokinetic analysis.

Results: Ketotifen was not superior to placebo with regard to global clinical response. Only 18% of patients demonstrated a complete or near-complete clinical response. The estimated half-life was 3.3 h.

Conclusions: While ketotifen was not superior to placebo, this study highlights several important challenges for developing drug trials for youth with chronic abdominal pain. Recommendations are made for designing a larger treatment trial for ketotifen in this patient group.

Clinical trial registration: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02484248.

Bacterial infection is one of the major causes of neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Finding rapid and reliable methods for early recognition and diagnosis of bacterial infections and early individualization of antibacterial drug administration are essential to eradicate these infections and prevent serious complications. However, this is often difficult to perform due to non-specific clinical presentations, low accuracy of current diagnostic methods, and limited knowledge of neonatal pharmacokinetics. Although neonatal medicine has been relatively late to embrace the benefits of machine learning (ML), there have been some initial applications of ML for the early prediction of neonatal sepsis and individualization of antibiotics. This article provides a brief introduction to ML and discusses the current state of the art in diagnosing and treating neonatal bacterial infections, gaps, potential uses of ML, and future directions to address the limitations of current studies. Neonatal bacterial infections involve a combination of physiologic development, disease expression, and treatment response outcomes. To address this complex relationship, future models could consider appropriate ML algorithms to capture time series features while integrating influences from the host, microbes, and drugs to optimize antimicrobial drug use in neonates. All models require prospective clinical trials to validate their clinical utility before clinical use.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (BESPONSA™) is a CD22-targeted monoclonal antibody drug conjugate (ADC) developed by Pfizer for the treatment of CD22-postive B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Inotuzumab ozogamicin comprises a humanized IgG4 anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody covalently linked to the potent DNA-binding cytotoxic agent N-acetyl-gamma-calicheamicin dimethylhydrazide (CalichDMH) via a linker. Inotuzumab ozogamicin binds to CD22-expressing tumour cells, facilitating the delivery of conjugated CalichDMH, which after intracellular activation induces double strand DNA breaks, ultimately leading to cell cycle arrest and apoptotic cell death. Inotuzumab ozogamicin is approved in the USA, Europe and several countries worldwide for the treatment of relapsed or refractory CD22-positive B-cell precursor ALL in adults. On 6 March 2024, inotuzumab ozogamicin received its first pediatric approval in the USA for this indication in patients aged ≥ 1 years. Inotuzumab ozogamicin has since been approved in Japan in March 2024 for the same indication in pediatric patients. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of inotuzumab ozogamicin leading to this first approval for the treatment of relapsed or refractory CD22-positive B-cell precursor ALL in pediatric patients.

Neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) is a potentially serious and life-threatening complication of SLE. The presentation and severity of neuropsychiatric involvement in SLE may show considerable variability. The disease can affect the neural tissue directly or may be associated with vascular involvement, mainly associated with anti-phospholipid (aPL) antibodies. A direct causal link with SLE may sometimes be challenging since there are many confounding factors and the symptoms may be non-specific. Despite its remarkable sensitivity in detecting hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke, transverse myelitis and ischemic infarction, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lacks the spatial resolution required to identify microvascular involvement. When standard MRI fails to detect a suspicious lesion, it is advisable to use advanced imaging modalities such as positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or quantitative MRI, if available. Even with these advanced modalities, the specificity of neuroimaging in NPSLE remains inadequate (60-82% for MRI). Neuropsychiatric syndromes, such as cerebrovascular events, seizures and cognitive impairments appear to be associated with serum aPL antibodies. Some studies have shown that anti-ribosomal P antibodies have a low sensitivity for NPSLE and a limited contribution to the differentiation of different clinical entities. Treatment has two main goals: symptomatic relief and treatment of the disease itself. Commonly used immunosuppressants for NPSLE include cyclophosphamide (CYC), azathioprine (AZA), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). According to EULAR's current recommendation, strong immunosuppressants such as CYC and rituximab (RTX) should be preferred. Biologics have also been used in NPSLE. Fingolimod, eculizumab, and JAK inhibitors are potential drugs in the pipeline. Developing targeted therapies will be possible by a better understanding of the pathological mechanisms.

Objectives: The management of vascular malformations is complex and challenging. This study aimed to explore efficacy, plasma trough concentrations of sirolimus, post-withdrawal conditions, and adverse reactions of sirolimus in treating complex vascular malformations.

Methods: In our center, we analyzed vascular malformations treated with sirolimus (and corticosteroid) from August 2017 to June 2021. Meanwhile, we reviewed the medical records, the efficacy, side effects, and laboratory tests. Patients who had stopped taking sirolimus were followed up by telephone.

Results: A total of 25 patients with complicated vascular malformations in our center, including 7 females and 18 males aged 4 months to 15 years, were enrolled. In all, 19 patients (76.0%) responded to sirolimus, and the plasma concentration of sirolimus fluctuated between 0.97 and 27.15 ng/ml. In all, 24 patients (96.0%) were in follow-up. A total of 15 patients (62.5%) stopped taking sirolimus during follow-up, and 2 patients (13.3%) discontinued the sirolimus due to side effects. A total of 3 patients (20.0%) restarted sirolimus treatment.

Conclusion: Starting dose of 1.5-2 mg/m² sirolimus is effective and safe in vascular malformation treatment. The best treatment regimen and discontinuation indications needed more investigation. Most should be done about targeted therapy to improve effectiveness and reduce side effects.