Pediatric Drugs最新文献

New drugs for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) are emerging rapidly. However, we and others believe these drugs are achieving regulatory approval prematurely. It is the cardiorespiratory complications of DMD that cause the disease's major morbidities and that determine survival. Thus, to be truly effective, a new drug must improve cardiorespiratory function; instead, new drugs are approved for patient use via accelerated regulatory pathways that rely on surrogate outcome measures with unproven clinical benefits (such as tissue levels of non-biologic, truncated dystrophin) and on scales that reflect muscle strength (such as small improvements in timed activities). In DMD, cardiorespiratory complications occur in "older" individuals who are in the non-ambulatory stage of the disease. In contrast, accelerated approvals are based on data from young, ambulatory subjects, a group that essentially never experiences cardiorespiratory complications. When drug studies do obtain cardiorespiratory data, their methodologies are suboptimal. We critically review these methodologies in detail, including problems with the use of threshold levels of respiratory function as outcome measures; problems with the use of historical controls, whose results vary widely, and are influenced by uncontrolled variables related to their observational nature; and the limitations of using percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC %pred), and its single rate of decline across a wide range of age and function, as a preferred respiratory outcome measure. We discuss the advantages of an alternative respiratory outcome, the absolute value of FVC with aging (the "Rideau plot"). Unlike FVC %pred, the Rideau plot considers distinct phenotypes rather than aggregating all individuals into a single respiratory trajectory. Key features of the Rideau plot can show the nature and timing of a drug's effect on respiratory function, making it a potentially better outcome measure for assessing the respiratory effects of a drug. With this article, we use our respiratory perspective to critically examine the DMD drug development process and to propose improvements in study methodologies and in the regulatory processes that approve new drugs.

The prevention, recognition, and treatment of pain is crucial in the management of neonates. Infants do not tolerate pain better than adults; indeed, the immaturity of the endogenous antalgic system means they exhibit an increased stress response. Pain has been associated with worse cognitive and motor scores, reduced growth trend, reduced brain maturation, and altered corticospinal tract structure. The use of the intranasal route for drug delivery is currently expanding because it has many advantages. In certain contexts, it is preferable over the oral route because of the faster entry of drugs into the circulation, the absence of structural changes by the gastrointestinal environment, and the absence of the hepatic first-pass effect. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs commonly used for pain management have peculiar characteristics in infants, especially premature infants. In this article, we summarise the evidence regarding pain management in infants using intranasally administered drugs. We then provide a practical guide to the use of intranasal drugs currently being studied in the neonatal population, focusing on appropriate dosages and indications. Intranasal fentanest appears to be an attractive therapeutic alternative for procedural and palliative neonatal pain management when intravenous access is unavailable in preterm infants. Intranasal midazolam is a valid alternative to consider in term or near-term neonates, especially when the aim is to obtain sedation (and not analgesia, i.e. during magnetic resonance imaging), ketamine has favourable cardiovascular effects and should be considered in specific patients and situations. Intranasal dexmedetomidine is well tolerated in premature neonates. Additionally, endonasal dexmedetomidine can be used in combination with other anaesthetic, sedative, hypnotic, and opioid drugs to allow for dose reduction in sedated neonates.

Despite an opportunity to prevent adult psychopathology associated with bipolar disorder through early diagnosis in children, there is insufficient information and awareness among healthcare providers about the unique features and treatment of mania and its comorbid conditions in children. Converging evidence from disparate sites describe a developmentally distinct presentation of bipolar disorder in youth that is highly morbid, persistent and responds to treatment with the mood stabilizer medications used in the treatment of adult bipolar disorder, such as divalproex sodium and carbamazepine. Some are additionally approved for use in pediatric populations including, for manic or mixed states, risperidone, aripiprazole, and asenapine for those aged 10-17 years and also including lithium and olanzapine for ages 13-17 years. Quetiapine is approved as monotherapy or as adjunct to lithium or divalproex sodium for manic states in those aged 10-17 years. Delayed or missed diagnosis, inappropriate treatment, worsening course, and treatment resistance unfortunately still occur. While an array of mood-stabilizing medications is available for treatment, such as second-generation antipsychotics, lithium, and anticonvulsants, these can be only partially effective and fraught with annoying and serious side effects. This article will review current practice in the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric bipolar disorder and its comorbid conditions, highlighting areas of need for future research.

Pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) refers to multiple sclerosis with onset before 18 years of age. It is characterized by a more inflammatory course, more frequent clinical relapses, and a greater number of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesions compared with adult-onset MS (AOMS), leading to significant impacts on both disability progression and cognitive outcomes in affected individuals. Managing POMS presents distinct challenges due to the unique needs of pediatric patients and the limited number of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) approved for pediatric use. Notably, only one therapy (fingolimod) is approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and three (fingolimod, teriflunomide, and dimethyl fumarate) by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for use in youth with MS. However, observational evidence identifies use of almost all agents off-label in this population. This review provides a comprehensive overview of literature supporting the use of DMTs for POMS, including evidence from observational studies. In this paper, we highlight the shift in clinical practice, which has led to increased use of high-efficacy therapies (HETs) at or near disease onset. We review emerging evidence indicating better cognitive and motor outcomes in this population with early initiation of therapy. Finally, in this paper, we provide a suggested treatment algorithm for managing POMS. We underscore the need for personalized approaches in POMS management. We identify special considerations unique to pediatric care, including attention to family dynamics, and strategies to improve medication adherence and a smooth transition to adult care. Further research on DMTs in POMS is essential to optimize outcomes and improve long-term prognosis.

Daily, children undergo countless investigations and interventions, which require sedation and immobilization to ensure safety and accuracy. This remains associated with a persistent risk of sedation-induced life-threatening events as children are particularly vulnerable to adverse medical events and complications. Consequently, there is an urgent need to increase the safety of pediatric sedation and anesthesia. An ideal approach involves the use of drugs with fewer intrinsic side effects. In this context, on the basis of their pharmacokinetic properties, remimazolam (RMZ) and dexmedetomidine (DEX) were evaluated for their suitability as ideal sedatives. RMZ and DEX, both of which are currently available in pediatric medicine, have shown great promise in initial publications. To date, only very limited data concerning RMZ in small children are available. RMZ is a novel, ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine that is metabolized by tissue esterase, largely independent of organ function. It has a context-sensitive half-life of approximately 10 min, with minimal accumulation even with prolonged use. Its effects can be completely reversed with flumazenil. DEX, an isomer of medetomidine, is a potent α2-receptor-agonist with multiple indications in anesthesia and intensive care medicine. It has coanalgesic potential, allows for 'arousal sedations' and has a low profile for cardiorespiratory side effects. DEX is metabolized in the liver and is predominantly excreted renally. Both drugs show potential in the prevention and treatment of delirium, with DEX having additional neuroprotective effects. DEX and RMZ possess several properties of an optimal sedative, including clinically insignificant main metabolites and a broad dosage range, indicating their potential to reduce the incidence of sedation-related life-threatening events in children. However, further clinical research is necessary to better evaluate their potential risks.

Background: Drug dosing recommendations in paediatrics are mainly based on the age and bodyweight of the child. Because of the limited amount of label information, several paediatric drug formularies have been developed. This study compares anti-infective drug dosing recommendations across three European formularies.

Methods: Recommendations from three paediatric formularies (German Pediatric Formulary [GPF], SwissPedDose [SPD] and the British National Formulary for Children [BNF]) were collected. Using population growth curves, we simulated one child for each month from 1 month up to 18 years of age. The recommendations from each formulary were used to calculate doses for each simulated child. Equivalence and difference in calculated doses were analysed.

Results: In total, dosing recommendations for 34 anti-infective substances were collected with 74 corresponding indications, which resulted in 47,154 calculated doses. The mean (± standard deviation) proportion of equivalent doses (difference ≤10%) across all three formularies was 40% (±16), while for pairwise comparisons it was 53% (±19) for GPF versus BNF, 67% (±14) for GPF versus SPD and 52% (±19) for SPD versus BNF. The median [25th quantile, 75th quantile] differences in daily doses across all three formularies were 0%, [0, 26] while for pairwise comparisons it was 4% [0, 32] for GPF versus BNF, 0% [0, 17] for GPF versus SPD and 7% [0, 33] for SPD versus BNF.

Conclusions: The majority of recommended anti-infective drug doses were consistent, with the highest equivalence found between GPF and SPD. Maintaining formularies is resource intensive; therefore, a common standard in Europe could prove beneficial when moving towards digitalisation of the healthcare systems.

Introduction: Less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) involves delivering surfactant to a spontaneously breathing infant by passing a thin catheter through the vocal cords and has become the preferred method for surfactant delivery. However, the role of pre-LISA sedation remains unclear.

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the use of dexmedetomidine for LISA in preterm and early-term infants.

Methods: This retrospective study evaluated preterm and early-term infants who received intravenous dexmedetomidine for LISA between December 2022 and March 2024. Primary outcomes included safety parameters such as the absence of bradycardia, hypotension, hypothermia, or respiratory depression, and the success rate of LISA, determined by the lack of endotracheal intubation within 72 h. Intergroup comparison based on a cutoff of 32 weeks post-menstrual age (PMA) was performed.

Results: Thirty-seven infants were included. The mean ± SD PMA at birth, birth weight, and age at LISA were 32.2 ± 2.7 weeks, 1879 ± 698 g, and 13.9 ± 12.4 h, respectively. Mean dexmedetomidine dosage was 0.66 ± 0.26 μg/kg. Six patients (16.2%) developed mild hypothermia, and 10 (27%) experienced apnea/bradycardia within 24 h. The success rate of the procedure was 89.2%. Infants born before 32 weeks received lower doses of dexmedetomidine than those born at 32 weeks and above (0.54 ± 0.24 versus 0.76 ± 0.24 μg/kg, p < 0.01). Safety and success rates of LISA were similar across groups.

Conclusion: This is the first report on dexmedetomidine as pre-LISA sedation, demonstrating its feasibility with comparable success rates regardless of PMA. These findings may inform future studies on sedation strategies for LISA.

This narrative review examines the evolving role of opioids in managing procedural and surgical pain in pediatric oncology patients. The review evaluates studies on opioid use across various oncological surgeries including thoracic, abdominal, orthopedic, and neurosurgical procedures, as well as for common painful procedures such as bone marrow aspirations and lumbar punctures. While opioids remain important for acute procedural and postoperative pain management in pediatric oncology patients, there is an increasing emphasis on multimodal, opioid-sparing approaches. The evidence presented within this review highlights the growing focus on judicious postoperative opioid prescribing to mitigate risks of adverse effects and persistent use or potential misuse. The review synthesizes findings from studies investigating various analgesic regimens, including the use of regional anesthesia techniques like epidural analgesia and peripheral nerve blocks, which have shown promise in reducing opioid requirements. For procedural pain, the review explores the efficacy of combining opioids with sedatives like midazolam or propofol, as well as the potential of ketamine as an opioid-sparing alternative. Key findings indicate that opioid-sparing techniques can effectively reduce overall opioid consumption without compromising pain control or patient satisfaction. Several studies demonstrated that regional anesthesia techniques and non-opioid adjuncts can significantly lower postoperative opioid requirements across various surgical procedures. For procedural pain, ketamine-based regimens often showed comparable or superior pain control to opioid-based approaches, with some studies reporting better patient satisfaction. This review also addresses the importance of tailored postoperative opioid prescribing, with some studies presenting algorithms to predict outpatient opioid needs more accurately. These approaches aim to ensure adequate pain control while minimizing excess opioid dispensing.

Introduction: Critically ill pediatric patients are endotracheally intubated in pediatric intensive care units for a variety of illnesses and indications. Management of an endotracheal tube (ETT) requires suctioning to remove patient secretions and prevent occlusion, but this practice can be associated with adverse events, such as hemodynamic deterioration or increases in intracranial pressure. Instillation of lidocaine into the ETT before suctioning may be beneficial in preventing these events. The purpose of this phase I, fixed-dose, open-label pharmacokinetic and safety study, conducted in endotracheally intubated and mechanically ventilated infants and children requiring ETT suctioning, was to determine the serum concentrations and safety of lidocaine after ETT administration.

Methods: A total of 21 infants and children meeting inclusion criteria received a single dose of ETT lidocaine per institutional protocol. Blood samples were obtained pre-dose and at 5, 10, 30, and 120 minutes after administration for serum concentration analysis. Lidocaine dosing was driven by weight and age, with infants and children aged >  38 weeks' estimated gestational age and < 3 years receiving 0.5 mg/kg/dose (maximum: 20 mg/dose) and children aged 3-18 years receiving 1 mg/kg/dose (maximum: 100 mg/dose).

Results: No subjects aged < 3 years had detectable serum lidocaine concentrations. Four subjects in the group aged ≥  3 years had detectable serum lidocaine concentrations at 5, 10, and/or 30 minutes, but no serum concentrations were within the toxic range. No adverse effects, such as cough, bronchospasm, seizure activity, or clinically significant depression of cardiac or respiratory function, were noted in any subjects.

Conclusions: Pharmacokinetic sampling showed that only 4 of 21 subjects had detectable serum lidocaine concentrations and none were within the toxic range. The safety of ETT administration of lidocaine in endotracheally intubated infants and children requiring ETT suctioning was demonstrated at the doses used in this study. The study was conducted at Norton Children's Hospital. The research team confirmed that this study was not registered with clinicaltrials.gov.