Pediatric Drugs最新文献

Background: Ruxolitinib has been increasingly used in the treatment of steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GVHD) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) patients. However, there are limited data on the use of ruxolitinib in children.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and toxicity of ruxolitinib in the treatment of SR-GVHD in children.

Patients and methods: Data of patients who suffered from SR-GVHD after allo-HSCT and received ruxolitinib treatment between June 2018 and December 2020 at our center were analyzed retrospectively. The characteristics of patients, the dosage of ruxolitinib, the response, toxicity, and the survival data were collected.

Results: A total of 14 pediatric patients were diagnosed with SR-GVHD after allo-HSCT and received ruxolitinib. The age of the patients ranged from 3 months to 12 years old. The dosage of ruxolitinib ranged from 2.5 mg twice daily to 7.5 mg twice daily, mainly according to patient weight. The total overall response rate (ORR) was 64.3% (9/14), with 63.6% (7/11) in aGVHD and 67% (2/3) in cGVHD. Of the 14 patients, adverse effects were observed in 9 patients (64.3%), including cytopenia, infection, and elevated alanine aminotransferase. In addition, seven reports on the treatment of SR-GVHD in children with ruxolitinib were included for systematic analysis, with the ORR ranging from 45 to 87% in aGVHD and 70-91% in cGVHD.

Conclusion: Given its effectiveness and safety, ruxolitinib could be used to treat SR-GVHD in children after HSCT.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic systemic immune-mediated disorder. The disease is triggered and perpetuated by a complex interplay between genetic predisposition, dysregulated immune responses, and environmental factors. Pediatric IBD is considered to be more aggressive compared with adult-onset IBD, and commonly requires more intensive pharmacological and surgical treatments. Although the use of targeted therapy, such as biologic therapy and small molecule therapy, is on the rise, there are children with IBD who are refractory to all current therapeutic options. For them, a combination of biologic agents or a biologic agent with small molecules as dual-targeted therapy (DTT) may be a possible therapeutic option. The main indications for DTT are high inflammatory burden and refractoriness to standard therapy, extra-intestinal manifestations of IBD, adverse effects of therapy, and co-existing immune-mediated inflammatory disorders. Several combination therapies were described for pediatric refractory IBD. The main ones were anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents and vedolizumab (VDZ), anti-TNF and ustekinumab (UST), VDZ and UST, and biologic agents with tofacitinib. DTT exhibits high efficacy, with high rates of clinical response and remission as well as biomarker remission. The data on endoscopic and radiologic remission are scarce. Most of the adverse effects reported under DTT were mild; however, the serious ones that had been observed mandate a profoundly cautious approach when considering it. Triple immunosuppressive therapy and combinations of biologics with emergent therapies such as selective Janus kinase inhibitors, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators, and anti-interleukin-23 agents, are potential future regimens for children with IBD who are refractory to current therapeutic options. This review provides an update of publications on these issues.

20‑valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20; Prevnar 20^®; Apexxnar^®) is a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) developed by Pfizer for active immunization for the prevention of pneumococcal infections. PCV20 has a similar structure and formulation to Pfizer's 13-valent PCV (PCV13; Prevnar 13^®; Prevenar 13^®), with the addition of polysaccharides to target seven further Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes (8, 10A, 11A, 12F, 15B, 22F and 33F). PCV20 has been approved for active immunization for the prevention of pneumonia and invasive disease caused by S. pneumoniae in adults since June 2021 in the USA and since February 2022 in the EU. Following further evaluation of its safety, immunogenicity, and effectiveness in pediatric populations, in April 2023 PCV20 received its first pediatric approval, in the USA, for active immunization for the prevention of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) caused by S. pneumoniae serotypes 1, 3, 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 8, 9V, 10A, 11A, 12F, 14, 15B, 18C, 19A, 19F, 22F, 23F, and 33F in individuals 6 weeks to 17 years of age and for the prevention of otitis media caused by S. pneumoniae serotypes 4, 6B, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F, and 23F in individuals 6 weeks to 5 years of age. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of PCV20 leading to this first pediatric approval for active immunization for the prevention of IPD and otitis media caused by S. pneumoniae.

Background: Enteral ibuprofen was first approved as a prescription drug in 1974 for the US market. An intravenous (IV) ibuprofen formulation is approved for use in children older than 6 months of age, but there are limited studies specifically evaluating the pharmacokinetics and safety in children 1-6 months of age.

Aims: The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of IV ibuprofen in infants younger than 6 months of age. The secondary objective was to evaluate the safety of single and repeated doses of IV ibuprofen in infants younger than 6 months of age.

Methods: This was an industry-sponsored multi-center study. Institutional Review Board approval and informed parental consent were obtained prior to enrollment. Hospitalized neonates and infants younger than 6 months of age with fever or expected postoperative pain were eligible. Enrolled patients received 10 mg/kg of IV ibuprofen every 6 h, with up to four doses per day. Patients were randomized to two sparse sampling technique pharmacokinetic sample time groups. Group 1 samples were drawn at 0, 30 min, and 2 h, while group 2 samples were drawn at 0 min, 1, and 4 h after administration.

Results: A total of 24 children were enrolled in the study, with 15 male patients and 9 female patients. The median age of the cohort was 4.4 months (range 1.1-5.9 months), and the median weight was 5.9 kg (range 2.3-8.8 kg). The arithmetic mean and standard error for peak plasma ibuprofen concentration was 56.28 ± 2.77 µg/mL. Plasma levels declined rapidly with a mean elimination half-life of 1.30 h. Time to peak ibuprofen effect and concentration were similar when compared with older pediatric patients. Clearance and volume of distribution were also similar to those reported in older pediatric patients. No drug-related adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: The pharmacokinetic and short-term safety profiles of IV ibuprofen in pediatric patients 1-6 months of age are comparable to those in children older than 6 months of age.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Trial Registration number and date: NCT02583399-Registered July 2017.

Background: The use of ustekinumab in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is off-label and the data are limited. We conducted a systematic review evaluating the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in pediatric IBD.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases for studies of ustekinumab in children and adolescents with IBD investigating clinical remission, clinical response, corticosteroid-free (CS-free) remission, endoscopic remission/response, or safety up to March 17, 2023. A random-effects model was used for calculating summary estimates.

Results: Eleven studies, comprising 370 patients were included. For Crohn's disease (CD), the pooled clinical remission rates were 34% (73/204) at 8-16 weeks and 46% (60/129) at 1 year. The pooled CS-free clinical remission rates were 23% (10/44) at 8-16 weeks and 45% (42/96) at 1 year. For ulcerative colitis (UC)/IBD unspecified (IBD-U), the pooled CS-free clinical remission rates were 24% (6/25) at 26 weeks and 46% (16/35) at 1 year. Endoscopic remission was found in 0-37.5% of CD and 63.6% of UC. Serious adverse events were reported in 3.5% of patients. About one half of patients required reduction in dose intervals and 62.75% patients could continue ustekinumab therapy at 1 year or final visit.

Conclusions: According to low-quality evidence mainly from cohort studies and case series, approximately one half of patients with CD and UC/IBD-U achieved remission at 1 year. Ustekinumab has a reasonable safety profile and dose optimization is frequently required. Data on the long-term benefit and high-quality evidence are still needed.

Background: Experience with nasogastric administration of oral DDAVP [desamino-D-arginine-8-vasopressin] lyophilisate (ODL) for central diabetes insipidus (CDI) in disabled children with swallowing coordination difficulties is limited.

Objective: We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of nasogastric use of ODL in disabled children with CDI. Time to serum sodium normalisation was compared with that of children with normal intellect and CDI treated with sublingual DDAVP.

Methods: Clinical, laboratory and neuroimaging characteristics were evaluated for 12 disabled children with CDI treated with ODL through nasogastric tube at Dr Behcet Uz Children's Hospital, Turkey, between 2012 and 2022.

Results: Six boys and six girls with a mean (±SD) age of 43 (± 40) months were evaluated. These children (mean [±SD] weight standard deviation score [SDS] - 1.2 ± 1.7; mean [±SD] height SDS - 1.3 ± 1.4) presented with failure to thrive, irritability, prolonged fever, polyuria and hypernatraemia (mean serum sodium 162 [±3.6] mEq/L). At diagnosis, mean serum and urine osmolality were 321 (± 14) mOsm/kg and 105 (± 7.8) mOsm/kg, respectively. Arginine vasopressin (AVP) levels were undetectable (< 0.5 pmol/L) at diagnosis in all patients. Nasogastric tube administration of DDAVP lyophilisate (120 µg/tablet) dissolved in water (10 mL) was commenced at a dose of 1-5 µg/kg/day in two divided doses together with controlled water intake to avoid hyponatraemia. The frequency and dose of DDAVP were titrated based on urine output and serum sodium concentration. Serum sodium declined at a rate of 0.11 ± 0.03 mEq/L/h and reached normal range in a mean duration of 174 ± 46.5 h. Serum sodium declined faster in children with normal intellect and CDI treated with sublingual DDAVP (1.28 ± 0.39 mEq/L/h; p = 0.0003). Three disabled children needed rehospitalisation because of hypernatraemia due to unintentional DDAVP omission by caregivers. No episode of hyponatraemia was observed. Weight gain and growth were normal during the median (± interquartile range) follow-up duration of 32 ± 67 months.

Conclusions: Nasogastric administration of oral DDAVP lyophilised formulation was safe and effective in the treatment of CDI in disabled children in this small retrospective series.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) are commonly used medications in neonates and infants for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), especially in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). A literature review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in preterm neonates, term neonates, and infants. A total of 27 studies were included in this review. Antacid medications in studies have consistently shown positive pharmacodynamic effects, including increasing gastric pH, reducing the reflux index, and reducing the number of acidic reflux events. The benefit found in placebo-controlled trials are limited exclusively to these surrogate outcomes. The actual clinically salient outcomes which H2RAs and PPIs are used for, such as reduction in GERD symptoms, especially irritability and improved feed tolerance and weight gain, have consistently shown no clinical benefit. H2RAs and PPIs appear to be extremely well tolerated by the neonatal and infant populations, which would mimic our experience with these medications in our unit. The available data from large, retrospective cohort and case-control studies paint a much more concerning picture regarding the potential for an increased risk in the development of allergies, anaphylactic reactions, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), other nosocomial infections, and lower respiratory tract infections. Given the risks associated with and lack of clinical effectiveness of both H2RAs and PPIs, use of these medications should be limited to specific clinical situations. Further studies are required to determine whether antacid pharmacologic therapy might benefit certain neonates and infants, such as those with complex medical issues.

Pitolisant (WAKIX^®), a histamine H₃ receptor antagonist/inverse agonist that has been developed by Bioprojet Pharma, is approved in the EU and USA and elsewhere for use in adults with narcolepsy with or without cataplexy. In February 2023, based on clinical data in patients aged 6 to < 18 years, pitolisant received its first approval in adolescents and children from the age of 6 years for the treatment of narcolepsy with or without cataplexy in the EU. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of pitolisant leading to this pediatric first approval for narcolepsy with or without cataplexy.

Histiocytic disorders are rare diseases defined by the clonal accumulation of a macrophage or dendritic cell origin. These disorders include Langerhans cell histiocytosis, Erdheim-Chester disease, juvenile xanthogranuloma, malignant histiocytoses, and Rosai-Dorfman-Destombes disease. These histiocytic disorders are a diverse group of disorders with different presentations, management, and prognosis. This review focuses on these histiocytic disorders and the role of pathological ERK signaling due to somatic mutations in the mitogen--activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Over the last decade, there has been growing awareness of the MAPK pathway being a key driver in many histiocytic disorders, which has led to successful treatment with targeted therapies, in particular, BRAF inhibitors and MEK inhibitors.

Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a severe hemodynamic condition with high morbidity and mortality. Approved targeted therapies are limited for pediatric subjects, and treatments are widely adopted from adult algorithms. Macitentan is a safe and effective drug used for adult PH, but data on pediatric patients are limited. In this prospective single-center study, we investigated mid- and long-term effects of macitentan in children with advanced pulmonary hypertensive vascular disease.

Methods: Twenty-four patients were enrolled in the study for treatment with macitentan. Efficacy was determined by echo parameters and brain natriuretic peptide levels (BNP) at 3 months and 1 year. For detailed analysis, the entire cohort was subgrouped into patients with congenital heart disease-related PH (CHD-PH) and non-CHD-PH patients, respectively.

Results: Mean age of the patients was 10.7 ± 7.6 years; median observation period was 36 months. Twenty of 24 patients were on additional sildenafil and/or prostacyclins. Two of 24 patients discontinued because of peripheral edema. Within the entire cohort, BNP levels and all echo measures such as right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP), right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (RVED), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), pulmonary velocity time integral (VTI), and pulmonary artery acceleration time (PAAT) improved significantly after 3 months (p ≤ 0.01), whereas in the long term significant improvement persisted for BNP levels (-16%), VTI (+14%) and PAAT (+11%) (p < 0.05). By subgroup analysis, non-CHD PH patients showed significant improvements in BNP levels (-57%) and all echo measures (TAPSE +21%, VTI +13%, PAAT +37%, RVSP -24%, RVED -12%) at 3 months (p ≤ 0.01), whereas at 12 months, improvements persisted (p < 0.05) except for RVSP and RVED (nonsignificant). In CHD-PH patients, none of the measures changed (nonsignificant). 6-MWD (distance walked in 6 minutes) slightly increased but was not statistically evaluated.

Conclusion: Data presented herein account for the largest cohort of severely affected pediatric patients receiving macitentan. Overall, macitentan was safe and associated with significant beneficial effects and sustained positive signals after 1 year, albeit in the long term disease progression remains a major concern. Our data suggest limited efficacy in CHD-related PH, whereas favorable outcomes were mainly driven by improvements in patients with PH not related to CHD. Larger studies are needed to verify these preliminary results and to prove efficacy of this drug in different pediatric PH entities.