Background: Infected necrotizing pancreatitis (INP) patients requiring open necrosectomy (ON) as part of the step-up approach generally face high postoperative mortality. Our center proposed the step-cross approach as a supplement, but supporting evidence remains limited. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between the step-cross and step-up approaches in INP patients.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult INP patients admitted to our center from 2017 to 2022. The step-cross approach consisted of percutaneous catheter drainage, followed by accelerated focused ON and personalized drainage or debridement as needed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for confounders.
Results: Of 509 included patients (median age 46 [34-55] years, 67.6 % male), 454 (89.2 %) and 55 (10.8 %) underwent the step-up and step-cross approach respectively. Overall, 180-day mortality was 20.2 % (103/509): 83 (18.3 %) in the step-up group and 20 (36.4 %) in step-cross group. After PSM (53 matched pairs), 180-day mortality did not differ significantly (35.9 %vs 49.1 %, relative risk [RR] and 95 % confidence interval [CI] with the step-cross approach = 0.73 [0.46-1.15], P = 0.169), but the step-cross group was associated with lower CRRT duration (2 [0, 16] vs 15 [3.5, 22] days, P = 0.005) and fewer minimally invasive necrosectomy procedures. Complications, hospital stays and costs were comparable between groups.
Conclusions: The step-cross approach is a safe complementary strategy to the step-up approach, demonstrating trends toward lower mortality and reduced organ support requirements in selected INP patients. Nevertheless, these findings require validation through large-scale prospective studies.

