Background: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) presents a surgical challenge, and its feasibility in patients on dialysis is debated due to concerns over heightened perioperative risks. This study employs the NSQIP pancreatectomy database to investigate the impact of dialysis on PD-specific postoperative complications.
Methods: The NSQIP pancreatectomy targeted user file spanning 2014 to 2023 was used to identify patients undergoing a PD. Patients on dialysis were matched 1:3 to patients not receiving dialysis. Comparative analysis evaluated morbidity, mortality, and PD-specific complications.
Results: Among 43,565 patients who underwent a PD, 123 patients were on dialysis. Even after matching, dialysis patients displayed higher rates of complications, re-intubation, cardiac arrest, and bleeding (p < 0.001); furthermore, 30-day mortality was higher in the dialysis group (8.1% vs 3.0%, p = 0.014). However, rates of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, and indwelling drain on POD 30 did not differ.
Conclusions: Although dialysis patients undergoing PD face increased risks of mortality and complications, PD-specific complications were not affected. These findings offer valuable insights for patient counseling and surgeon awareness.
Background: Infected necrotizing pancreatitis (INP) patients requiring open necrosectomy (ON) as part of the step-up approach generally face high postoperative mortality. Our center proposed the step-cross approach as a supplement, but supporting evidence remains limited. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between the step-cross and step-up approaches in INP patients.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult INP patients admitted to our center from 2017 to 2022. The step-cross approach consisted of percutaneous catheter drainage, followed by accelerated focused ON and personalized drainage or debridement as needed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for confounders.
Results: Of 509 included patients (median age 46 [34-55] years, 67.6 % male), 454 (89.2 %) and 55 (10.8 %) underwent the step-up and step-cross approach respectively. Overall, 180-day mortality was 20.2 % (103/509): 83 (18.3 %) in the step-up group and 20 (36.4 %) in step-cross group. After PSM (53 matched pairs), 180-day mortality did not differ significantly (35.9 %vs 49.1 %, relative risk [RR] and 95 % confidence interval [CI] with the step-cross approach = 0.73 [0.46-1.15], P = 0.169), but the step-cross group was associated with lower CRRT duration (2 [0, 16] vs 15 [3.5, 22] days, P = 0.005) and fewer minimally invasive necrosectomy procedures. Complications, hospital stays and costs were comparable between groups.
Conclusions: The step-cross approach is a safe complementary strategy to the step-up approach, demonstrating trends toward lower mortality and reduced organ support requirements in selected INP patients. Nevertheless, these findings require validation through large-scale prospective studies.

