PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology最新文献

STERIS and W.L. GORE collaborated on a case study testing the compatibility of a new prefilled syringe plunger design with VHP terminal sterilization. VHP chamber conditions require deep vacuum pulsing, which may represent challenges to prefilled syringe container integrity. The growing industry trend toward VHP sterilization is driven by the FDA search for alternative sterilization methods to EO and the recent publication of a VHP specific process standard. The purpose of the study is to test and report compatibility of the new 0.5 mL GORE IMPROJECT plunger, a silicone free syringe solution for ophthalmic application, with VHP sterilization. Various challenges have been reported when using conventional, siliconized, prefilled syringe systems for intravitreal injections such as subvisible particles, inflammation, silicone floaters, and intraocular pressure increases. The GORE plunger eliminates the need for silicone oil as a lubricant on the plunger and barrel, while meeting strict container closure and terminal sterilization requirements of ophthalmic applications. This case study presents successful results of deep vacuum VHP terminal sterilization process compatibility with the GORE plunger design and material composition. Test results include primary container integrity, stopper off-gassing/ingress, and visual inspection. Principles of VHP vacuum sterilization process, test cycle configuration, and its main parameters are presented.

With increased demand on sealed packed, pre-sterilized ready-to-use (RTU) components like Syringes & Vials, the ebeam technology is used as transfer technology with surface decontamination for transfer of the RTU in a GRADE A environment like an Isolator.

As autoinjector requirements become increasingly diverse and pharma companies look for quicker routes to market, with lower costs and improved sustainability, there is an increasing trend towards devices with a reusable element. The flexibility in reusable elements can be beneficial for pharma companies with access to these platforms, allowing a relatively rapid transition between different drug combinations. However, it can also lead to devices designed to cover a wide range of requirements which are over designed for their actual more limited end use. The challenge of creating both a cost and sustainability optimised platform device is significantly harder than if developing a single use device with a specific purpose in mind. This paper looks at the range of reusable products on the market, examining some of the assertions around the cost and sustainability benefits of these devices as well as where there are trade-offs relative to current single use format devices.

This research sought to evaluate payer perspectives around OBDS's through semi-structured interviews with 17 US payers representing approximately 227 million covered lives. When asked about the perceived advantages of the novel on-body delivery system (OBDS), 70.6% of payers independently cited simplicity, ease-of-use, and convenience as the most beneficial features, with the potential to replace IV infusion by facilitating at-home HCP- or self-administration being the second most frequent response. Most payers (88.2%) believed that the novel OBDS could fulfill unmet needs such as cost of IV infusion, convenient administration, and improved patient compliance in large-volume SC delivery by enabling safe, easy, self-administration. Nearly all payers (88.2%) stated they would consider covering and managing pharmaceutical products packaged with the novel OBDS, with the remaining payers considering the total cost compared to other routes. A significant proportion of payers (82.4%) acknowledged that a drug delivered via the novel OBDS could warrant a price premium above the cost of the standalone SC drug vial, with half stating the premium would range from 5% to 20% and the other half citing an unspecified premium dependent on the individual drug situation.Conclusions: Given the ability to help address critical unmet needs for the patient and healthcare system, a large proportion of the payers stated that the novel OBDS would fulfill unmet needs and warrant a price premium versus the cost of the standalone SC vial and certainly over the IV counterpart. Future research to quantify the value that OBDS efficiencies could bring to healthcare delivery is warranted.

Manufacturers of medical devices are legally required to carry out post-market surveillance and respond to any on-market complaints they receive about their device. When it comes to addressing use issues experienced on market, manufacturers often focus on revising the instructions for use (IFU) and labeling. One of the challenges with this approach is the potential need to re-validate via a human factors validation study, without knowing whether the changes made will be effective in addressing the identified issues. With populations becoming increasingly technically literate, there is now great potential to rethink the way we can support self-injection through digital and web-based tools. This paper introduces the potential of digital instructions to improve the user experience of self-injection and address known use issues, as well as the challenges of incorporating them in medical device design.

There is a significant opportunity to expand the understanding of subcutaneous injection mechanics with an aim to increase injectable volume while controlling tissue strain and associated subject pain. Computational modeling can evaluate the mechanics of subcutaneous injections as a supplement to experimental, animal and clinical studies. The objectives of this study are to (1) develop a computational model for subcutaneous injection in tissue, (2) investigate the influence anisotropic tissue permeability has on bolus formation, and (3) explore the effects that injection flow rate and viscosity have on injection flow and tissue strain. Poroelastic models with subsurface flow were implemented in finite element software (COMSOL, ABAQUS). Pore pressure and injectate distribution showed excellent agreement with experimental results when evaluated at multiple injection rates (20 ml/hr, 120 ml/hr and 360 ml/hr). Including the anisotropy of tissue permeability causes the injectate to preferentially spread horizontally, similar to experimentally observed bolus distributions. Cases are presented to provide additional insight into injection mechanics, including variations on the delivery rate, the injection volume, viscosity and the thickness of the subcutaneous layer. The results support the use of computational modeling as a valid tool for understanding tissue strains and injectate distributions for large volume injections.

Microbial challenge in-use studies are performed to evaluate the potential for microbial proliferation in preservative-free single-dose biological products after first puncture and potential accidental contamination during dose preparation (e.g., reconstitution or dilution) and storage. These studies, in addition to physicochemical in-use stability assessments, are used as part of product registration to define in-use hold times in Prescribing Information and in the pharmacy manual in the case of clinical products. There are no formal guidance documents describing regulator expectations on how to conduct microbial challenge in-use studies and interpret microbial data to assign in-use storage hold times. In lieu of guidance, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulators have authored publications and presentations describing regulator expectations. Insufficient or unavailable microbial challenge data can result in shortened in-use hold times, thus microbial challenge data enables flexibility for health care providers (HCPs) and patients while ensuring patient safety. A cross-industry/FDA in-use microbial working group was formed through the Innovation & Quality (IQ) Consortium to gain alignment among industry practice and regulator expectations. The working group assessed regulatory guidance, current industry practice via a blinded survey of IQ Consortium member companies, and scientific rationale to align on recommendations for experimental design, execution of microbial challenge in-use studies, and a decision tree for microbial data interpretation to assign in-use hold times. Besides the study execution and data interpretation, additional considerations are discussed including the use of platform data for clinical stage products, closed system transfer devices (CSTDs), transport of dose solutions, long infusion times, and the use of USP <797> by HCPs for preparing sterile drugs for administration. The recommendations provided in this article will help streamline biological product development, ensure consistency on assignment of in-use hold times in biological product labels across industry, and provide maximum allowable flexibility to HCPs and patients while ensuring patient safety.

When an initial marketing authorization of a pharmaceutical product is granted, a substantial number of chemistry, manufacturing, and control (CMC) post approval changes (PACs) have to be managed by the manufacturers. Despite efforts undertaken over the years by multiple regulatory jurisdictions, there is still heterogeneity in terms of regulatory requirements and timelines across national regulatory authorities (NRAs). This creates complexity in managing global CMC PACs, putting the supply of medical products at risk. Regulators have developed regulatory mechanisms that aim at accelerating the reviews and approvals of PACs by NRAs. The World Health Organization (WHO) is supporting the concept of "reliance" among NRAs, which are encouraged to rely on the assessment completed by a "highly performing authority". The objective is to accelerate the overall process for PACs, ultimately fostering more equitable and timely access to medical products for populations who need them. With the support of Health Canada, WHO, Pan American Health Organization, and the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Sanofi has launched a pilot using the principles of reliance for a CMC PAC for a vaccine, with 21 NRAs who accepted to participate in the pilot. The objective of this pilot was to apply these principles to reduce the approval timeline to a maximum of 6 months in all countries after an initial approval is granted by a reference authority. We discuss the opportunities and challenges of implementing reliance principles for CMC PACs. We also describe the pilot experience by sharing initial lessons learned from the Step 1 of this pilot, which consisted of engaging the reference authority and the NRAs.

Quality by design is the foundation of the risk management framework for extractables and leachables (E&Ls) recommended by the Extractables and Leachables Safety Information Exchange (ELSIE). Following these principles during the selection of materials for pharmaceutical product development minimizes the presence of highly toxic substances and decreases the health risk of potential leachables in the drug product. Therefore, in the context of the broad arena of chemicals, it is important to distinguish E&Ls as a subset of chemicals and evaluate this relevant chemical space to derive appropriate analytical and safety thresholds. When considering the health hazards posed by E&Ls, one area presenting a challenge is understanding the sensitization potential and whether it poses a risk to patients. A dataset of E&Ls compiled by ELSIE (n = 466) was analyzed to determine the prevalence and potency of skin sensitizers in this chemical subset and explore a scientifically justified approach to the sensitization assessment of potential leachables in parenteral drug products. Approximately half of the compounds (56%, 259/466) had sensitization data recorded in the ELSIE database and of these, 20% (52/259) are potential skin sensitizers. Only 3% (8/259) of the E&L dataset with sensitization data were considered potent (strong or extreme) sensitizers following in silico analysis and expert review, illustrating that potent sensitizers are not routinely observed as leachables in pharmaceutical products. Our analysis highlights that in silico potency prediction and expert review are key tools during the sensitization assessment process for E&Ls. The results confirm where material selection is anticipated to mitigate the risk of presence of strong and/or extreme sensitizers (e.g., extractable testing via ISO 10993-10), and that implementing thresholds per ICH M7 and/or Masuda-Herrera et al. provides a reasonably conservative approach for establishing the analytical testing and safety thresholds.

In a joint study carried out by Gerresheimer, Sterigenics and Früh, it could be shown that also NO₂ is well suited to terminally sterilize prefilled ophthalmic syringes. In detail 5 topics were addressed: (1) Compare EtO vs. NO₂ penetration into the filled syringe; (2) Analyze gas ingress though 4 different plunger stoppers including silicone oil free and standard rubber plungers; (3) Scrutinize gas ingress through 2 different cap designs based on different elastomer properties; (4) Investigate gas permeation through COP plastic barrels compared to glass; (5) Check if the Tyvek®-layer has an influence on either sterilization.Depending on the needs a suitable sterilization method, packaging and syringe type can be suggested to customers.