{"title":"Response to comment on \"Delirium event and associated treatment modifications among older adults with Alzheimer's disease: An interrupted time-series analysis of Medicare data\".","authors":"Rajender R Aparasu, Ashna Talwar","doi":"10.1002/phar.4637","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.4637","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":"45 1","pages":"71"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143024519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-12-13DOI: 10.1002/phar.4633
Sodam Kim, Landon Welch, Bertha De Los Santos, Przemysław B Radwański, Mark A Munger, Kibum Kim
Background: Drug-induced atrial fibrillation (AF) is recognized as an important causal association. Lamotrigine (LTG) is a widely prescribed neurological agent with Class IB antiarrhythmic properties at therapeutically relevant concentrations. The United States Food and Drug Administration has issued a warning for a higher risk of LTG proarrhythmic events in patients with structural heart disease (SHD) and/or myocardial ischemia. This study evaluated the incidence of AF with LTG use.
Methods: A retrospective observational study was performed using a large healthcare claims database of adult participants analyzing 2 years AF incidence. The analytic cohort included adult participants with bipolar I disorder (BPD), partial seizures (PSZ), or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTSZ). Exposure to LTG was compared with commonly prescribed alternative agents as the control comparators (CTR). Participants were free from supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmias during the 6 months baseline period prior to the index LTG or CTR date. Kaplan-Meier estimator calculated 2 years cumulative AF incidence, with participants censored at last enrollment, treatment switching, or discontinuation. The AF association hazard ratios (HR) for LTG versus CTR were adjusted for baseline characteristics.
Results: The analytic cohort with BPD, PSZ, and GTSZ consisted, respectively, of 150,470 LTG versus 204,704 CTR, 9565 LTG versus 21,595 CTR, and 5505 LTG versus 15,513 CTR patients. In a predominantly middle-aged female population at baseline, the prevalence of cardiovascular conditions was low. The 12 months cumulative incidence of AF for LTG versus CTR was 0.764% versus 0.642% among BPD, 0.833% versus 0.646% among PSZ, and 0.585% versus 0.338% among GTSZ, respectively. The adjusted 365-day HR [95% confidence interval CI] of AF for LTG versus CTR in the BPD, PSZ, and CTSZ groups was 1.257 [1.088-1.453], 1.651 [1.104-2.468], and 1.451 [0.770-2.734], respectively.
Conclusions: In adult AF-naïve participants, LTG has a strong association with increased AF risk compared with commonly prescribed alternatives.
{"title":"Association of atrial fibrillation with lamotrigine: An observational cohort study.","authors":"Sodam Kim, Landon Welch, Bertha De Los Santos, Przemysław B Radwański, Mark A Munger, Kibum Kim","doi":"10.1002/phar.4633","DOIUrl":"10.1002/phar.4633","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug-induced atrial fibrillation (AF) is recognized as an important causal association. Lamotrigine (LTG) is a widely prescribed neurological agent with Class IB antiarrhythmic properties at therapeutically relevant concentrations. The United States Food and Drug Administration has issued a warning for a higher risk of LTG proarrhythmic events in patients with structural heart disease (SHD) and/or myocardial ischemia. This study evaluated the incidence of AF with LTG use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was performed using a large healthcare claims database of adult participants analyzing 2 years AF incidence. The analytic cohort included adult participants with bipolar I disorder (BPD), partial seizures (PSZ), or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTSZ). Exposure to LTG was compared with commonly prescribed alternative agents as the control comparators (CTR). Participants were free from supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmias during the 6 months baseline period prior to the index LTG or CTR date. Kaplan-Meier estimator calculated 2 years cumulative AF incidence, with participants censored at last enrollment, treatment switching, or discontinuation. The AF association hazard ratios (HR) for LTG versus CTR were adjusted for baseline characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analytic cohort with BPD, PSZ, and GTSZ consisted, respectively, of 150,470 LTG versus 204,704 CTR, 9565 LTG versus 21,595 CTR, and 5505 LTG versus 15,513 CTR patients. In a predominantly middle-aged female population at baseline, the prevalence of cardiovascular conditions was low. The 12 months cumulative incidence of AF for LTG versus CTR was 0.764% versus 0.642% among BPD, 0.833% versus 0.646% among PSZ, and 0.585% versus 0.338% among GTSZ, respectively. The adjusted 365-day HR [95% confidence interval CI] of AF for LTG versus CTR in the BPD, PSZ, and CTSZ groups was 1.257 [1.088-1.453], 1.651 [1.104-2.468], and 1.451 [0.770-2.734], respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In adult AF-naïve participants, LTG has a strong association with increased AF risk compared with commonly prescribed alternatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"20-32"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142822328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Comment on \"Delirium event and associated treatment modifications among older adults with Alzheimer's disease: An interrupted time-series analysis of Medicare data\".","authors":"Shih-Jie Wang, Lien-Chung Wei, Hsien-Jane Chiu","doi":"10.1002/phar.4636","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.4636","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":"45 1","pages":"70"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143024511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-12-04DOI: 10.1002/phar.4632
Natalie A Finch, Alejandro Granillo, Nazanin Pouya, Adarsh Bhimraj, William R Miller, Vincent H Tam
Objective: Cefiderocol is a novel antibiotic used to treat multidrug-resistant bacterial infections. However, there is limited data on its effectiveness for ventriculitis. The objective of this study was to evaluate cefiderocol concentrations in both serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) during the treatment of ventriculitis.
Method: A 54-year-old patient with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii ventriculitis was given cefiderocol intravenously 2 g every 6 h (each dose administered over 3 h). Serial samples were obtained over a dosing interval at steady state, and cefiderocol concentrations in serum and CSF were assayed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Cefiderocol serum concentration-time profile was characterized by a one-compartment model with zero-order input. Penetration into CSF was estimated as the CSF AUC/unbound serum AUC ratio.
Results: Observed total serum concentrations ranged between 24.6 and 76.7 mg/L, while CSF concentrations were approximately 10.0 mg/L. The AUC0-6 of the free drug in serum and CSF were 181.6 and 60.2 mg h/L, respectively.
Conclusion: We observed minimal fluctuation of cefiderocol concentrations in CSF, questioning the conventional reliance on CSF/serum area under the curve (AUC) ratio as a measure of CNS penetration. Our experience suggests that a single CSF concentration (random or trough) could be directly compared to the minimum inhibitory concentration, offering a potentially simpler approach to evaluate dosing adequacy.
目的:头孢地罗是一种治疗耐多药细菌感染的新型抗生素。然而,关于其对脑室炎的有效性的数据有限。本研究的目的是评估脑室炎治疗期间血清和脑脊液(CSF)中头孢地罗的浓度。方法:对1例54岁耐碳青霉烯不动杆菌鲍曼脑室炎患者给予头孢地诺静脉滴注2 g / 6h(每次给药时间超过3h)。在稳定给药间隔内获得连续样品,采用液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)测定血清和脑脊液中头孢地罗的浓度。头孢地罗血清浓度-时间分布采用零阶输入的单室模型。通过脑脊液AUC/未结合血清AUC比值来估计其对脑脊液的渗透。结果:观察到血清总浓度在24.6 ~ 76.7 mg/L之间,脑脊液浓度约为10.0 mg/L。血清和脑脊液游离药物的AUC0-6分别为181.6和60.2 mg h/L。结论:我们观察到脑脊液中头孢地罗浓度的最小波动,质疑传统的依赖脑脊液/血清曲线下面积(AUC)比作为CNS渗透的衡量标准。我们的经验表明,单个CSF浓度(随机或低谷)可以直接与最低抑制浓度进行比较,从而提供了一种潜在的更简单的方法来评估剂量的充分性。
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics of cefiderocol in a patient with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii ventriculitis: A case report.","authors":"Natalie A Finch, Alejandro Granillo, Nazanin Pouya, Adarsh Bhimraj, William R Miller, Vincent H Tam","doi":"10.1002/phar.4632","DOIUrl":"10.1002/phar.4632","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cefiderocol is a novel antibiotic used to treat multidrug-resistant bacterial infections. However, there is limited data on its effectiveness for ventriculitis. The objective of this study was to evaluate cefiderocol concentrations in both serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) during the treatment of ventriculitis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A 54-year-old patient with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii ventriculitis was given cefiderocol intravenously 2 g every 6 h (each dose administered over 3 h). Serial samples were obtained over a dosing interval at steady state, and cefiderocol concentrations in serum and CSF were assayed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Cefiderocol serum concentration-time profile was characterized by a one-compartment model with zero-order input. Penetration into CSF was estimated as the CSF AUC/unbound serum AUC ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Observed total serum concentrations ranged between 24.6 and 76.7 mg/L, while CSF concentrations were approximately 10.0 mg/L. The AUC<sub>0-6</sub> of the free drug in serum and CSF were 181.6 and 60.2 mg h/L, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed minimal fluctuation of cefiderocol concentrations in CSF, questioning the conventional reliance on CSF/serum area under the curve (AUC) ratio as a measure of CNS penetration. Our experience suggests that a single CSF concentration (random or trough) could be directly compared to the minimum inhibitory concentration, offering a potentially simpler approach to evaluate dosing adequacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"66-69"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757030/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142771233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-12-16DOI: 10.1002/phar.4635
Candice L Garwood, Katherine P Cabral, Roy Brown, Dave L Dixon
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels is a primary strategy to reduce ASCVD risk. Although statin therapy remains the initial therapy of choice to reduce LDL-C and ASCVD risk, statin intolerance and suboptimal LDL-C lowering response prompts the need for additional non-statin therapies. Ezetimibe and bempedoic acid are reasonable options but they modestly reduce LDL-C levels (15% to 25%). Therapies directed at the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) enzyme, however, reduce LDL-C levels by 50%-60% when added to background statin therapy. PCSK9 is an enzyme synthesized by the liver that facilitates the degradation of LDL receptors and prevents their recycling to the hepatocyte surface to remove LDL-C from circulation. Approaches to inhibit this effect have centered on monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (alirocumab, evolocumab) targeting PCSK9 functionality and small interfering RNA (siRNA) therapies (inclisiran) targeting the hepatic synthesis of PCSK9. Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated beneficial cardiovascular outcomes of PCSK9 mAbs, but such evidence is not yet available for inclisiran. Current clinical practice guidelines generally recommend PCSK9-directed therapies for higher-risk patients with established ASCVD and those with familial hypercholesterolemia. This approach is, in part, due to their cost and uncertain economic value, but also because these therapies require subcutaneous administration, which is not preferred by some patients. Oral therapies targeting PCSK9 are, however, in development. This scoping review covers the development of current and emerging PCSK9-directed therapies, their efficacy, safety, and role in clinical practice.
{"title":"Current and emerging PCSK9-directed therapies to reduce LDL-C and ASCVD risk: A state-of-the-art review.","authors":"Candice L Garwood, Katherine P Cabral, Roy Brown, Dave L Dixon","doi":"10.1002/phar.4635","DOIUrl":"10.1002/phar.4635","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels is a primary strategy to reduce ASCVD risk. Although statin therapy remains the initial therapy of choice to reduce LDL-C and ASCVD risk, statin intolerance and suboptimal LDL-C lowering response prompts the need for additional non-statin therapies. Ezetimibe and bempedoic acid are reasonable options but they modestly reduce LDL-C levels (15% to 25%). Therapies directed at the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) enzyme, however, reduce LDL-C levels by 50%-60% when added to background statin therapy. PCSK9 is an enzyme synthesized by the liver that facilitates the degradation of LDL receptors and prevents their recycling to the hepatocyte surface to remove LDL-C from circulation. Approaches to inhibit this effect have centered on monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (alirocumab, evolocumab) targeting PCSK9 functionality and small interfering RNA (siRNA) therapies (inclisiran) targeting the hepatic synthesis of PCSK9. Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated beneficial cardiovascular outcomes of PCSK9 mAbs, but such evidence is not yet available for inclisiran. Current clinical practice guidelines generally recommend PCSK9-directed therapies for higher-risk patients with established ASCVD and those with familial hypercholesterolemia. This approach is, in part, due to their cost and uncertain economic value, but also because these therapies require subcutaneous administration, which is not preferred by some patients. Oral therapies targeting PCSK9 are, however, in development. This scoping review covers the development of current and emerging PCSK9-directed therapies, their efficacy, safety, and role in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"54-65"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755694/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142829728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-11-22DOI: 10.1002/phar.4618
Satoru Mitsuboshi, Makoto Morizumi, Shungo Imai, Satoko Hori, Kazumasa Kotake
Conflicting data have been reported on the association between mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) and acute kidney injury (AKI). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether MRAs affect the risk of AKI. MEDLINE via PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the ClinicalTrials.gov website were comprehensively searched to extract all relevant studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected that compared MRA versus placebo or no treatment and had study populations consisting of patients with heart or kidney disease. The primary outcome was AKI. The secondary outcome was kidney injury, including AKI and non-AKI. Thirty-three studies were included in the meta-analysis. MRAs were not associated with an increased risk of AKI (risk ratio [RR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-1.46, p = 0.29, I2 = 15%, 18,065 patients, 13 RCTs, moderate certainty). For the secondary outcome, MRAs were associated with an increased risk of kidney injury (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.24-1.87, p < 0.01, I2 = 48%, 27,492 patients, 33 RCTs, low certainty). In particular, only canrenone (RR 5.39, 95% CI 2.17-13.37, p < 0.01) and spironolactone (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.48-2.14, p < 0.01) were associated with an increased risk of kidney injury. However, eplerenone and finerenone seem not to increase the risk of kidney injury in patients with heart or kidney disease. The selection of MRAs might influence the risk of kidney-associated events. Further studies focusing on individual MRAs may be needed to clarify these differences.
关于矿质皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)与急性肾损伤(AKI)之间的关系,已有相互矛盾的数据报道。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估 MRA 是否会影响急性肾损伤的风险。我们通过 PubMed、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 网站对 MEDLINE 进行了全面检索,以提取所有相关研究。筛选出的随机对照试验(RCT)对 MRA 与安慰剂或无治疗进行了比较,研究对象包括心脏病或肾病患者。主要结果为 AKI。次要结果是肾损伤,包括 AKI 和非 AKI。荟萃分析纳入了 33 项研究。MRA 与 AKI 风险增加无关(风险比 [RR] 1.13,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.88-1.46,P = 0.29,I2 = 15%,18,065 名患者,13 项 RCT,中度确定性)。在次要结局方面,MRA 与肾损伤风险增加有关(RR 1.52,95% CI 1.24-1.87,P 2 = 48%,27,492 名患者,33 项 RCT,低度确定性)。其中,只有坎利酮(RR 5.39,95% CI 2.17-13.37,P
{"title":"Association between mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and kidney harm: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Satoru Mitsuboshi, Makoto Morizumi, Shungo Imai, Satoko Hori, Kazumasa Kotake","doi":"10.1002/phar.4618","DOIUrl":"10.1002/phar.4618","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Conflicting data have been reported on the association between mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) and acute kidney injury (AKI). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether MRAs affect the risk of AKI. MEDLINE via PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the ClinicalTrials.gov website were comprehensively searched to extract all relevant studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected that compared MRA versus placebo or no treatment and had study populations consisting of patients with heart or kidney disease. The primary outcome was AKI. The secondary outcome was kidney injury, including AKI and non-AKI. Thirty-three studies were included in the meta-analysis. MRAs were not associated with an increased risk of AKI (risk ratio [RR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-1.46, p = 0.29, I<sup>2</sup> = 15%, 18,065 patients, 13 RCTs, moderate certainty). For the secondary outcome, MRAs were associated with an increased risk of kidney injury (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.24-1.87, p < 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 48%, 27,492 patients, 33 RCTs, low certainty). In particular, only canrenone (RR 5.39, 95% CI 2.17-13.37, p < 0.01) and spironolactone (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.48-2.14, p < 0.01) were associated with an increased risk of kidney injury. However, eplerenone and finerenone seem not to increase the risk of kidney injury in patients with heart or kidney disease. The selection of MRAs might influence the risk of kidney-associated events. Further studies focusing on individual MRAs may be needed to clarify these differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"43-53"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142693137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-11-26DOI: 10.1002/phar.4631
Chin Hang Yiu, Bella D Ianni, Kenji Fujita, Edwin C K Tan, Sarah N Hilmer, Christine Y Lu
Introduction: Thiopurine drugs are metabolized by thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) and low TPMT activity can result in severe adverse drug reactions. Therefore, TPMT testing is recommended for individuals receiving thiopurines to reduce the risk of toxicity.
Objectives: The objectives of this study were to assess the rate of TPMT testing among individuals receiving thiopurines and explore factors associated with undergoing TPMT testing in Australia.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized administrative data from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS), and the 2021 Census, accessed via the Person Level Integrated Data Asset (PLIDA) at the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) DataLab. Individuals receiving thiopurines aged 18 years or above were identified using PBS data and exposure to TPMT testing was determined using MBS data. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with TPMT testing.
Results: A total of 62,574 prevalent thiopurine users were identified between 2020 and 2022. Of these, 20,327 (32.5%) underwent TPMT testing (2011-2022). The most significant factor associated with TPMT testing was having at least one thiopurine medication prescribed by a medical specialist (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.02-2.22), compared to having medication solely prescribed by primary care physicians (PCPs). Other significant factors associated with TPMT testing included speaking a non-English language at home (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.22-1.36), having no chronic health conditions (aOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.13-1.24), not requiring assistance with core activities (aOR 1.16, 95% CI 1.08-1.23), and having a higher educational attainment (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06-1.11). Compared to living in major cities, individuals living in remote areas were significantly less likely to undergo testing (aOR 0.49, 95% CI 0.39-0.60).
Conclusion: Our study highlights the low utilization of TPMT testing in Australia and suggests the need for targeted interventions to address disparities and improve TPMT testing.
简介:硫嘌呤药物通过硫嘌呤甲基转移酶(TPMT)进行代谢,TPMT活性低会导致严重的药物不良反应。因此,建议对接受硫嘌呤类药物治疗的患者进行 TPMT 检测,以降低中毒风险:本研究旨在评估澳大利亚接受硫嘌呤类药物治疗者的 TPMT 检测率,并探讨与接受 TPMT 检测相关的因素:这项回顾性队列研究利用了来自药品福利计划(PBS)、医疗保险福利表(MBS)和2021年人口普查的行政数据,这些数据可通过澳大利亚统计局(ABS)数据实验室的个人综合数据资产(PLIDA)获取。接受硫嘌呤类药物治疗的 18 岁或 18 岁以上的患者使用 PBS 数据进行识别,TPMT 检测暴露使用 MBS 数据进行确定。为了确定与TPMT检测相关的因素,进行了多变量逻辑回归:结果:在 2020 年至 2022 年期间,共确定了 62574 名硫脲类药物使用者。其中,20327 人(32.5%)接受了 TPMT 检测(2011-2022 年)。与 TPMT 检测相关的最重要因素是至少有一种硫嘌呤药物是由专科医生处方的(调整后的几率比 [aOR] 2.12,95% 置信区间 [CI] 2.02-2.22),而不是仅由初级保健医生(PCP)处方的药物。与 TPMT 检测相关的其他重要因素包括:在家讲非英语语言(aOR 1.29,95% CI 1.22-1.36)、无慢性疾病(aOR 1.18,95% CI 1.13-1.24)、不需要核心活动协助(aOR 1.16,95% CI 1.08-1.23)以及教育程度较高(aOR 1.11,95% CI 1.06-1.11)。与居住在大城市的人相比,居住在偏远地区的人接受检测的可能性明显较低(aOR 0.49,95% CI 0.39-0.60):我们的研究凸显了澳大利亚TPMT检测利用率低的问题,并表明有必要采取有针对性的干预措施来解决差异并改善TPMT检测。
{"title":"Utilization and associated factors of TPMT testing among Australian adults receiving thiopurines: A national retrospective data-linkage study.","authors":"Chin Hang Yiu, Bella D Ianni, Kenji Fujita, Edwin C K Tan, Sarah N Hilmer, Christine Y Lu","doi":"10.1002/phar.4631","DOIUrl":"10.1002/phar.4631","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Thiopurine drugs are metabolized by thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) and low TPMT activity can result in severe adverse drug reactions. Therefore, TPMT testing is recommended for individuals receiving thiopurines to reduce the risk of toxicity.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this study were to assess the rate of TPMT testing among individuals receiving thiopurines and explore factors associated with undergoing TPMT testing in Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study utilized administrative data from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS), and the 2021 Census, accessed via the Person Level Integrated Data Asset (PLIDA) at the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) DataLab. Individuals receiving thiopurines aged 18 years or above were identified using PBS data and exposure to TPMT testing was determined using MBS data. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with TPMT testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 62,574 prevalent thiopurine users were identified between 2020 and 2022. Of these, 20,327 (32.5%) underwent TPMT testing (2011-2022). The most significant factor associated with TPMT testing was having at least one thiopurine medication prescribed by a medical specialist (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.02-2.22), compared to having medication solely prescribed by primary care physicians (PCPs). Other significant factors associated with TPMT testing included speaking a non-English language at home (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.22-1.36), having no chronic health conditions (aOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.13-1.24), not requiring assistance with core activities (aOR 1.16, 95% CI 1.08-1.23), and having a higher educational attainment (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06-1.11). Compared to living in major cities, individuals living in remote areas were significantly less likely to undergo testing (aOR 0.49, 95% CI 0.39-0.60).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study highlights the low utilization of TPMT testing in Australia and suggests the need for targeted interventions to address disparities and improve TPMT testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"12-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142716819","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1002/phar.4628
Nicholas R Nelson, Nicholas J Quinn, Stephanie Bills, Alexander Dellabella, Sarah E Gregar, Alyssa Lear, Legacy Marsolek, Crystal Mounce, Morgan Tobin
The objective of this scoping review was to answer the question, "What has been published describing drug dosing in sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED)?" PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched on November 18, 2022. Methodology followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework for scoping reviews and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Two investigators independently screened abstracts and full-texts of citations identified related to drug dosing and SLED. Exclusion criteria included case reports, conference abstracts, pediatrics, treatment dialysis, and non-human subjects. A standardized data extraction sheet was used to collate and summarize data. The quality of evidence was evaluated by two investigators using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A total of 230 citations were identified for screening. Of these, 29 studies met criteria for inclusion after full-text review. Four drug groups including beta-lactam antibiotics, non-beta-lactam antibiotics, antifungals, and levetiracetam were identified. Dialysate rates, dialysis durations, and medication doses used varied widely across studies. Outcomes and pharmacokinetic parameters that were assessed were also heterogenous. Drug dosing in SLED is challenging and there is minimal evidence available to guide appropriate dosing. Larger studies are needed to more accurately determine how to appropriately dose medications in SLED. Therapeutic drug monitoring should be used in all patients on SLED when available.
{"title":"Scoping review of drug dosing recommendations in sustained low-efficiency dialysis.","authors":"Nicholas R Nelson, Nicholas J Quinn, Stephanie Bills, Alexander Dellabella, Sarah E Gregar, Alyssa Lear, Legacy Marsolek, Crystal Mounce, Morgan Tobin","doi":"10.1002/phar.4628","DOIUrl":"10.1002/phar.4628","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this scoping review was to answer the question, \"What has been published describing drug dosing in sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED)?\" PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched on November 18, 2022. Methodology followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework for scoping reviews and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Two investigators independently screened abstracts and full-texts of citations identified related to drug dosing and SLED. Exclusion criteria included case reports, conference abstracts, pediatrics, treatment dialysis, and non-human subjects. A standardized data extraction sheet was used to collate and summarize data. The quality of evidence was evaluated by two investigators using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A total of 230 citations were identified for screening. Of these, 29 studies met criteria for inclusion after full-text review. Four drug groups including beta-lactam antibiotics, non-beta-lactam antibiotics, antifungals, and levetiracetam were identified. Dialysate rates, dialysis durations, and medication doses used varied widely across studies. Outcomes and pharmacokinetic parameters that were assessed were also heterogenous. Drug dosing in SLED is challenging and there is minimal evidence available to guide appropriate dosing. Larger studies are needed to more accurately determine how to appropriately dose medications in SLED. Therapeutic drug monitoring should be used in all patients on SLED when available.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"948-955"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142865046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-11-16DOI: 10.1002/phar.4626
Emma M Tillman, Selsbiel Mertami
Pediatric obesity is a growing health concern that has many secondary adverse health implications. Personalized medicine is a tool that can be used to optimize diagnosis and treatments of many diseases. In this review, we will focus on three areas related to the genetics of pediatric obesity: (i) genetic causes predisposing to pediatric obesity, (ii) pharmacogenomics that may predict weight gain associated with pharmacotherapy, and (iii) pharmacogenomics of anti-obesity pharmacotherapy. This narrative review evaluates genetic cause of pediatric obesity and how genetic findings can be used to optimize pharmacotherapy to minimize weight gain and optimize obesity treatment in pediatric patients. Pediatric obesity has many genetic causes including genomic obesity syndromes and monogenic obesity disorders. Several genetic etiologies of obesity have current or emerging targeted genetic therapies. Pharmacogenomic (PGx) targets associated with pharmacotherapy-induced weight gain have been identified for antipsychotic, antiepileptic, antidepressant therapies, and steroids, yet to date no clinical guidelines exist for application use of PGx to tailor pharmacotherapy to avoid weight gain. As legislation evolves for genetic testing coverage and technology advances, this will decrease cost and expand access to genetic testing. This will result in identification of potential genetic causes of obesity and genes that predispose to pharmacotherapy-induced weight gain. Advances in precision medicine can ultimately lead to development of clinical practice guidelines on how to apply genetic findings to optimize pharmacotherapy to treat genetic targets of obesity and avoid weight gain as an adverse event associated with pharmacotherapy.
{"title":"Precision medicine to identify, prevent, and treat pediatric obesity.","authors":"Emma M Tillman, Selsbiel Mertami","doi":"10.1002/phar.4626","DOIUrl":"10.1002/phar.4626","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pediatric obesity is a growing health concern that has many secondary adverse health implications. Personalized medicine is a tool that can be used to optimize diagnosis and treatments of many diseases. In this review, we will focus on three areas related to the genetics of pediatric obesity: (i) genetic causes predisposing to pediatric obesity, (ii) pharmacogenomics that may predict weight gain associated with pharmacotherapy, and (iii) pharmacogenomics of anti-obesity pharmacotherapy. This narrative review evaluates genetic cause of pediatric obesity and how genetic findings can be used to optimize pharmacotherapy to minimize weight gain and optimize obesity treatment in pediatric patients. Pediatric obesity has many genetic causes including genomic obesity syndromes and monogenic obesity disorders. Several genetic etiologies of obesity have current or emerging targeted genetic therapies. Pharmacogenomic (PGx) targets associated with pharmacotherapy-induced weight gain have been identified for antipsychotic, antiepileptic, antidepressant therapies, and steroids, yet to date no clinical guidelines exist for application use of PGx to tailor pharmacotherapy to avoid weight gain. As legislation evolves for genetic testing coverage and technology advances, this will decrease cost and expand access to genetic testing. This will result in identification of potential genetic causes of obesity and genes that predispose to pharmacotherapy-induced weight gain. Advances in precision medicine can ultimately lead to development of clinical practice guidelines on how to apply genetic findings to optimize pharmacotherapy to treat genetic targets of obesity and avoid weight gain as an adverse event associated with pharmacotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"939-947"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11687202/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142644383","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-11-27DOI: 10.1002/phar.4629
Mohammed Al Musawa, Callan R Bleick, Shelbye R Herbin, Kaylee E Caniff, Sean R Van Helden, Michael J Rybak
Antimicrobial resistance poses a significant public health challenge, particularly with the rise of gram-negative hospital-acquired infections resistant to carbapenems. Aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) is a promising new combination therapy designed to combat multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria, including those producing metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs). Aztreonam, a monobactam antibiotic, is resistant to hydrolysis by MBLs but can be degraded by other β-lactamases. Avibactam, a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor, effectively neutralizes extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and AmpC β-lactamases, restoring aztreonam's efficacy against resistant pathogens. This review covers the chemistry, mechanisms of action, spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical efficacy of ATM-AVI. ATM-AVI combination has shown efficacy against a wide range of resistant Enterobacterales and other gram-negative bacteria in both in vitro and clinical studies. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses demonstrate that ATM-AVI maintains effective drug concentrations in the body, with dose adjustments recommended for patients with renal impairment. Clinical trials, including the REVISIT and ASSEMBLE studies, have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of ATM-AVI in treating complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), urinary tract infections (UTIs), and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) caused by MDR gram-negative pathogens. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has approved ATM-AVI for these indications, and further research is ongoing to optimize dosing regimens and expand its clinical use. This combination represents a critical advancement in the fight against antimicrobial resistance, offering a new therapeutic option for treating severe infections caused by MDR gram-negative, including MBL-producing, bacteria.
{"title":"Aztreonam-avibactam: The dynamic duo against multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens.","authors":"Mohammed Al Musawa, Callan R Bleick, Shelbye R Herbin, Kaylee E Caniff, Sean R Van Helden, Michael J Rybak","doi":"10.1002/phar.4629","DOIUrl":"10.1002/phar.4629","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antimicrobial resistance poses a significant public health challenge, particularly with the rise of gram-negative hospital-acquired infections resistant to carbapenems. Aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) is a promising new combination therapy designed to combat multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative bacteria, including those producing metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs). Aztreonam, a monobactam antibiotic, is resistant to hydrolysis by MBLs but can be degraded by other β-lactamases. Avibactam, a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor, effectively neutralizes extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and AmpC β-lactamases, restoring aztreonam's efficacy against resistant pathogens. This review covers the chemistry, mechanisms of action, spectrum of activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical efficacy of ATM-AVI. ATM-AVI combination has shown efficacy against a wide range of resistant Enterobacterales and other gram-negative bacteria in both in vitro and clinical studies. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses demonstrate that ATM-AVI maintains effective drug concentrations in the body, with dose adjustments recommended for patients with renal impairment. Clinical trials, including the REVISIT and ASSEMBLE studies, have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of ATM-AVI in treating complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), urinary tract infections (UTIs), and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) caused by MDR gram-negative pathogens. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has approved ATM-AVI for these indications, and further research is ongoing to optimize dosing regimens and expand its clinical use. This combination represents a critical advancement in the fight against antimicrobial resistance, offering a new therapeutic option for treating severe infections caused by MDR gram-negative, including MBL-producing, bacteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"927-938"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11687205/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142731826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}