Pharmacotherapy最新文献

Study objective: Establish methods for measuring cefmetazole (CMZ) concentrations conduct a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis using unbound CMZ concentrations for extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing enterobacterales (ESBL-E) and investigate optimal dosing regimens for not undergoing hemodialysis (non-HD) and undergoing hemodialysis (HD) patients.

Design: Prospective observational study.

Patients: Included patients treated with CMZ who provided written informed consent and were admitted to the Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center between August 2021 and July 2022.

Measurements: Total and Unbound CMZ concentration was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with solid-phase extraction and ultrafiltration.

Setting: Determining the CMZ dosing regimen involved modified creatinine clearance (CL_CR ) with measured body weight (BW) using the Cockcroft-Gault equation. For non-HD patients, blood samples were collected during at least three points. For patients undergoing HD, 1 g was administered via intravenous infusion, or rapid intravenous injection after HD, or 30 min before the end of HD. Blood samples were collected before HD (pre-HD), and 1 and 3 h after starting HD and post-HD. All blood samples were collected at steady-state. Patient information was collected from electronic medical records. An unbound PK model was constructed for the non-HD patients. A nomogram was constructed using Monte Carlo simulations with a 90% probability of target attainment at 70% free time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). For the HD patients, a nomogram was used to determine the optimal dosing regimen for each HD schedule.

Main results: CMZ measurement methods were established. A model analysis of unbound PK in 37 non-HD patients incorporated creatinine clearance (CL_CR ) using the Cockcroft-Gault equation, albumin (ALB) for clearance and body weight (BW) for the volume of distribution. In Monte Carlo simulations, nomograms corresponding to the MIC (known and unknown) were generated for each covariate. Using the nomogram, non-HD patients with an ESBL-E MIC of 8 mg/L, a BW of 60 kg, an ALB of 25 g/L, and a CL_CR of 60 mL/min required administration of 2 g every 6 h (1- and 3-h infusions). Unbound PK model parameters were calculated for 7 HD patients, and the optimal dosing regimens following PK/PD were determined for each HD schedule. In HD patients, the regimen after and during HD was established using a treatment that was effective up to an ESBL-E MIC of 4 mg/L.

Conclusions: The nomogram for CMZ regimens established by PK/PD analysis of measured CMZ concentrations enables optimal CMZ dosing for ESBL-E-infected patients.

Concomitant pain syndromes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) and disorders are associated with significant morbidity, impaired quality of life, and neuropsychiatric disorders. There is an interplay between the mechanisms of pathophysiology of both CVD and pain syndromes. Patients with CVD (and/or disorders) as well as pain syndromes have an increased propensity for drug-drug/disease interactions. Therefore, an understanding of how to use pharmacotherapy to treat pain syndromes, in the context of patients who have diagnoses of CVD and/or disorders, is paramount to patients' success in achieving adequate pain control and appropriately managing CVD and/or disorders, all while decreasing the risk of adverse events (AEs) both from pharmacotherapy to treat pain and CVD (and/or disorders). Based on the appraisal of literature and authors' clinical expertise, it was determined that gabapentinoids, opioids, skeletal muscle relaxants, tricyclic antidepressants, clonidine, serotonin norepinephrine-reuptake inhibitors, dronabinol, carbamazepine, second-generation antipsychotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin, corticosteroids, and topical anesthetics have the most evidence for use in patients with CVD and/or disorders. However, the literature surrounding the use of pharmacotherapy for pain management is limited to retrospective studies and there is a lack of well-designed, prospective, randomized trials; this also includes head-to-head comparator studies. Unlike many CVD-related pharmacotherapy studies, data studying pain management in patients with CVD lacks standardized outcomes that are consistent among the pool of data. Overall, the decision to prescribe specific pain management therapies in patients with CVD and/or disorders should include assessment of pain severity, type of pain, drug-drug/disease interactions, adjuvant therapies required, and the risk or presence of AEs.

Background: Prescription opioids have contributed to the rise in opioid-related overdoses and deaths. The presence of opioids within households may increase the risk of overdose among family members who were not prescribed an opioid themselves. Larger quantities of opioids may further increase risk.

Objectives: To determine the risk of opioid overdose among individuals who were not prescribed an opioid but were exposed to opioids prescribed to other family members in the household, and evaluate the risk in relation to the total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) present in the household.

Methods: We conducted a cohort study using a large database of commercial insurance claims from 2001 to 2021. For inclusion in the cohort, we identified individuals not prescribed an opioid in the prior 90 days from households with two or more family members, and determined the total MMEs prescribed to other family members. Individuals were stratified into monthly enrollment strata defined by household opioid exposure and other confounders. A generalized linear model was used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for overdose.

Results: Overall, the incidence of overdose among enrollees in households where a family member was prescribed an opioid was 1.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.67-1.78) times greater than households without opioid prescriptions. The risk of overdose increased continuously with the level of potential MMEs in the household from an IRR of 1.23 (95% CI: 1.16-1.32) for 1-100 MMEs to 4.67 (95% CI: 4.18-5.22) for >12,000 MMEs. The risk of overdose associated with household opioid exposure was greatest for ages 1-2 years (IRR: 3.46 [95% CI: 2.98-4.01]) and 3-5 years (IRR: 3.31 [95% CI: 2.75-3.99]).

Conclusions: The presence of opioids in a household significantly increases the risk of overdose among other family members who were not prescribed an opioid. Higher levels of MMEs, either in terms of opioid strength or quantity, were associated with increased levels of risk. Risk estimates may reflect accidental poisonings among younger family members.

Study objective: The standard of care for detecting acute kidney injury (AKI) is change in serum creatinine (SCr) and urine output, which are limited. This study aimed to compare urinary biomarkers neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL) with kidney injury molecule-1 (uKIM-1) in critically ill children exposed to vancomycin who did and did not develop AKI as defined by changes in SCr.

Design: Single-center, prospective, clinical, observational cohort study.

Setting: Tertiary care children's hospital in an urban setting.

Patients: Children aged 0 (corrected gestational age 42 weeks) to 18 years admitted to the intensive care unit who received vancomycin were included.

Intervention: None.

Measurements: The primary outcome was mean change in uNGAL and uKIM-1 between AKI and no-AKI groups. AKI was defined as a minimum 50% increase in SCr from baseline over a 48 h period, within 7 days of first vancomycin exposure. Three urine samples were collected: baseline (between 0 and 6 h of first vancomycin dose), second (18-24 h after the "baseline"), and third (18-24 h after the second sample). Concentrations of uKIM-1 and uNGAL were measured in each sample.

Main results: Forty-eight children (52% male; median age 6 years) were included. Eight (16.7%) children developed AKI. Mean changes in uNGAL (713.196 ± 1,216,474 vs. 16.101 ± 37.812 pg/mL; p = 0.0004) and uKIM-1 (6060 ± 11.165 vs. 340 ± 542 pg/mL; p = 0.0015) were greater in children with AKI versus no-AKI, respectively.

Conclusions: uNGAL and uKIM-1 concentrations increased significantly more in critically ill children with AKI compared with those with no-AKI during the first 48-72 h of vancomycin exposure and may be useful as prospective biomarkers of AKI.

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) commonly affect many patient populations. Recurrent UTIs (rUTIs) can be particularly problematic and lead to potential hospitalizations, multiple antibiotic courses, and have a potential negative impact on quality of life. To prevent UTIs, antibiotics are frequently used for prophylaxis; however, antibiotic prophylaxis has notable untoward consequences including but not limited to potential adverse effects and development of antibiotic resistance. Methenamine, an antiseptic agent initially available in 1967, has re-emerged as a potential option for UTI prophylaxis in various populations, including older adults and renal transplant recipients. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of methenamine for UTI prophylaxis. A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidance was performed. A PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library search was conducted to identify relevant English-language studies evaluating methenamine for UTI prophylaxis including randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, and meta-analyses through June 2023. Articles were excluded if the studies did not primarily describe or evaluate methenamine for UTI prophylaxis, were commentaries/viewpoints articles, point prevalence studies, review articles, studies that evaluated methenamine used with another agent, and any duplicate publications from searched databases. A total of 11 articles were identified for inclusion. This systematic review suggests methenamine generally appears to be an effective and well-tolerated antibiotic-sparing option for UTI prophylaxis. Furthermore, the pharmacology, dosage and formulation, warnings, precautions, and safety considerations of methenamine that provide potential clinical considerations regarding its use for UTI prophylaxis are described. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical utility of methenamine for UTI prophylaxis.

Study objective: The purpose of this study is to provide evidence for the safety and efficacy of factor Xa inhibitors in patients with a weight ≤60 kg or BMI < 18.5 kg/m² .

Design: Multicenter, retrospective, cohort study.

Setting: Twenty-two Ascension Health hospitals.

Patients: Low-body-weight adult patients (weight ≤ 60 kg or BMI < 18.5 kg/m² ) receiving treatment for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism.

Intervention: Factor Xa inhibitors (apixaban or rivaroxaban) or warfarin.

Measurements and main results: This study included 2538 patients between the factor Xa inhibitors (n = 1695) and warfarin (n = 843) groups with a mean weight of 53.5 ± 5.5 kg and BMI of 20.7 ± 3.1 kg/m² . No significant difference in time to major bleeding was noted after controlling for potential confounders (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.70-1.53, p = 0.87); similar results were seen following propensity score matching. Thromboembolism (5.3% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.38), composite major + clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (9.8% vs. 11.5%, p = 0.18), and all-cause mortality (10.7% vs. 12.8%, p = 0.12) were similar between patients receiving factor Xa inhibitors versus warfarin.

Conclusion: No differences in safety or effectiveness were noted between factor Xa inhibitors versus warfarin. These findings provide encouraging evidence to support the use of factor Xa inhibitors in low-body-weight patients.

Background and aims: Acid-suppressive drugs (ASDs) are widely used in many gastric acid-associated diseases. Nocturnal acid breakthrough has been a common problem of many ASDs, such as proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) and H₂ -receptor antagonists (H2RAs). Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are expected to solve this continuing conundrum. This article examined major ASDs and compared them with placebo in terms of nocturnal acid-inhibitory effects, using a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: To compare the effectiveness of major ASDs, a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was applied to process data extracted from RCTs. The plausible ranking for each regimen and some subgroups were assessed by surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA).

Results: Fifty-five RCTs were conducted with 2015 participants. In terms of nocturnal acid-inhibitory effects, the overall results showed that tegoprazan (SUCRA 91.8%) and vonoprazan (SUCRA 91.0%) had the best performance, followed by new PPIs (including tenatoprazole and ilaprazole) (SUCRA 76.6%), additional H2RAs once at bedtime (AHB) (SUCRA 61.3%), isomer PPIs (including esomeprazole and dexlansoprazole) (SUCRA 38.6%), revaprazan (SUCRA 34.7%), traditional PPIs (including omeprazole, rabeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole) (SUCRA 32.6%), H2RAs (SUCRA 23.1%), and placebo (SUCRA 0.3%). In some subgroups, the nocturnal acid-inhibitory effect of vonoprazan or tegoprazan was better than most of the other regimens, even new PPIs and AHB.

Conclusions: This is the first study to compare the effect of ASDs on inhibiting nocturnal acid breakthrough. Overall, in terms of nocturnal acid-inhibitory effect, vonoprazan and tegoprazan had an advantage against other regimens including H2RAs, isomer PPIs, traditional PPIs, AHB, and new PPIs. Even in some subgroups, such as language classification (English), types of study design (crossover-RCT), age (≤40 years), BMI (18.5-24.9 kg/m² ), continent (Asia and North America), disease status (health), the duration of therapy (2 weeks), and time of administration (at daytime or at night-time), the nocturnal acid-inhibitory effect of vonoprazan or tegoprazan were better than most regimens, even AHB and new PPIs.

Study objective: Recent studies suggest rapid administration of high-dose, undiluted levetiracetam is safe in adults; however, no information exists in pediatric patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of undiluted levetiracetam at a pediatric institution.

Design: Retrospective, single-center, cohort study.

Setting: Pediatric Academic Medical Center.

Patients: All patients who received high-dose >60 mg/kg (-10%) up to 4500 mg undiluted or diluted intravenous levetiracetam were included.

Intervention: Rapid intravenous administration of undiluted versus diluted levetiracetam.

Measurements and main results: A total of 776 levetiracetam doses were included, 358 doses administered and 418 doses wasted. The doses administered (61 undiluted and 297 diluted) accounted for a total of 252 patients (39 received undiluted, and 213 received diluted levetiracetam) (median [minimum-maximum range] age, 2 years [1 day to 32.7 years]; mean (standard deviation [SD]) weight, 20.1 kg [22.1 kg]). The incidence of hemodynamic disturbances and infusion-related reactions was not statistically significant between undiluted (24.6%) and diluted (26.3%) groups (p = 0.87). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) time difference between first-line antiseizure medication and levetiracetam administration in patients with status epilepticus was 18 min (10.5-30.5) in the undiluted group versus 36.5 min (21.8-67.3) in the diluted group (p < 0.01). Additionally, there was a significant amount of drug waste from dispensed but not administered doses of the diluted bag compared to undiluted vials (57.6% diluted vs. 18.7% undiluted, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Undiluted levetiracetam was not associated with an increased incidence of adverse effects compared to diluted levetiracetam in high-doses, up to 4500 mg given over 5 min in pediatric patients.