Pneumologie最新文献

Bronchiectasis is an etiologically heterogeneous, chronic, and often progressive respiratory disease characterized by irreversible bronchial dilation. It is frequently associated with significant symptom burden, multiple complications, and reduced quality of life. For several years, there has been a marked global increase in the prevalence of bronchiectasis, which is linked to a substantial economic burden on healthcare systems. This consensus-based guideline is the first German-language guideline addressing the management of bronchiectasis in adults. The guideline emphasizes the importance of thoracic imaging using CT for diagnosis and differentiation of bronchiectasis and highlights the significance of etiology in determining treatment approaches. Both non-drug and drug treatments are comprehensively covered. Non-pharmacological measures include smoking cessation, physiotherapy, physical training, rehabilitation, non-invasive ventilation, thoracic surgery, and lung transplantation. Pharmacological treatments focus on the long-term use of mucolytics, bronchodilators, anti-inflammatory medications, and antibiotics. Additionally, the guideline covers the challenges and strategies for managing upper airway involvement, comorbidities, and exacerbations, as well as socio-medical aspects and disability rights. The importance of patient education and self-management is also emphasized. Finally, the guideline addresses special life stages such as transition, family planning, pregnancy and parenthood, and palliative care. The aim is to ensure comprehensive, consensus-based, and patient-centered care, taking into account individual risks and needs.

Diagnosis of pneumonia can be challenging, particularly the differential diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infection and pneumonia, acute respiratory failure, the diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia and in case of treatment failure. As compared to conventional chest radiography and CT of the scan, sonography of the chest offers advantages. It could be demonstrated that it was even superior to chest radiography in the identification of pneumonic consolidations. Since most pneumonias affect the lower lobes and include the pleura, pneumonic substrates could be identified in up to 90% of cases despite the limited penetration depth of lung ultrasound. Sonography of the chest has become an established method in the diagnosis of both adult as well as in pediatric community-acquired pneumonia. In addition, it is particularly powerful when used within a point of care (POCUS) approach which also includes the evaluation of the heart. Finally, it appears to have significant potential also in the diagnosis of nosomomial pneumonia and in the evaluation of treatment response, both in the ward as in the ICU.

The original Valsalva manoeuvre (VM) was described in detail by the Italian anatomist, physician and surgeon Antonio Maria Valsalva (1666-1723). The VM consists of a voluntary forced expiratory effort against a closed upper airway. It was used tradionally in otolaryngology for testing the openess of the eustachian tubes and expelling pus/fluid from the middle to the external ear. VM is associated with increased intrathoracic and -abdominal pressure and leads to hemodynamic changes. The use of VM for cardiovascular purposes was first described by Eduard Friedrich Weber, a German physiologist. The Müller manoeuvre (MM) represents the opposite of the VM by forced inspiration against a closed upper airway. Negative intrathoracic and abdominal pressure (ITP) with direct effects on cardiac function and hemodynamics can be generated by the MM. MM has also been used to simulate the hemodynamic effects of negative ITP in obstructive sleep apnea patients. The Müller manoeuvre was first described by the German anatomist and physician Johannes Müller (1801-1858).

Background: The Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ), a 10-item, equally weighted, yes/no tool assessing symptom impairment and risk of exacerbations in patients with asthma aged ≥12 years, was developed and validated in a US patient population to evaluate varying levels of asthma control. This study aimed to validate the German language version of the AIRQ in patients aged ≥12 years with different levels of asthma control.

Methods: A cross-sectional, observational, multi-centre study comprising a single visit was conducted in multiple specialised asthma centres and general practices in Germany. A total of 300 patients completed the following measures: 1) Patient Sociodemographic and Clinical Questionnaire, 2) AIRQ, 3) Asthma Control Test (ACT), and 4) Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6). Logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the AIRQ score cut points with the greatest predictive validity in discriminating between different control levels relative to a standard of ACT plus prior-year exacerbations or ACQ-6 plus prior-year exacerbations.

Results: The German version of the AIRQ demonstrated a robust capability to correctly identify well-controlled versus not well- or very poorly controlled (AUC values of 0.90 or higher) and well- or not well-controlled versus very poorly controlled asthma (AUC values of 0.89 or higher).

Conclusions: The German version of the AIRQ is a suitable tool to identify adults with varying levels of asthma control, which in turn can help to accurately identify patients with uncontrolled asthma in clinical practice.

The S3 guideline on non-invasive ventilation as a treatment for chronic respiratory failure was published on the website of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) in July 2024. It offers comprehensive recommendations for the treatment of chronic respiratory failure in various underlying conditions, such as COPD, thoraco-restrictive diseases, obesity-hypoventilation syndrome, and neuromuscular diseases. An important innovation is the separation of the previous S2k guideline dating back to 2017, which included both invasive and non-invasive ventilation therapy. Due to increased scientific evidence and a significant rise in the number of affected patients, these distinct forms of therapy are now addressed separately in two different guidelines.The aim of the guideline is to improve the treatment of patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency using non-invasive ventilation and to make the indications and therapy recommendations accessible to all involved in the treatment process. It is based on the latest scientific evidence and replaces the previous guideline. This revised guideline provides detailed recommendations on the application of non-invasive ventilation, ventilation settings, and the subsequent follow-up of treatment.In addition to the updated evidence, important new features of this S3 guideline include new recommendations on patient care and numerous detailed treatment pathways that make the guideline more user-friendly. Furthermore, a completely revised section is dedicated to ethical issues and offers recommendations for end-of-life care. This guideline is an important tool for physicians and other healthcare professionals to optimize the care of patients with chronic respiratory failure. This version of the guideline is valid for three years, until July 2027.

Background: Gaps in optimal COPD management have been identified in clinical practice, with discrepancies between guideline recommendations and routine care. The reasons for such discrepancies are incompletely understood. The ELETHON survey aimed to identify physicians' attitudes towards general concepts of COPD management and, in particular, initiation of inhaled triple therapies.

Method: ELETHON was a nationwide cross-sectional survey with general practitioners (GP) and pulmonary specialists (PS) working in the ambulatory outpatient setting in Germany, using a structured 17-item questionnaire (single or multiple choice questions) addressing the topics of secondary prevention, exacerbation detection, strategies for therapy escalation, choice of inhaled triple therapies and evaluation of treatment benefits.

Results: Questionnaires filled by n=2028 GPs and n=371 PS were analyzed. In both groups, secondary prevention was deemed important in COPD care (GP/PS 76.4%/90.6%), with inhalation technique, vaccination status, and appropriate inhaled pharmacotherapy as key components. Activity/rehabilitation was rarely mentioned by GPs (48.3% vs. 84.5%). Exacerbations and symptomatic worsening were the main triggers for therapy escalation, but were not recorded in a structured way. "Hospitalization" and "≥2 ambulatory exacerbations" were mentioned most frequently as thresholds. Neither GPs nor PS measured eosinophils in the majority of patients. Fixed triple combinations were preferred, with availability of different treatment steps in the same device as important decision aid. Treatment success was evaluated by exacerbations, quality of life, symptoms, lung function and rescue medication use, while COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score was rarely used by GPs and PS.

Discussion and conclusion: The ELETHON survey identified gaps in COPD management in Germany. While secondary prevention is deemed important, escalation of inhaled therapy is undertaken rather late, the reported importance of vaccinations does not match current quota in German COPD patients, and non-pharmacological measures are often unused. Exacerbation and symptom documentation is rather subjective, validated questionnaires and blood eosinophils are of minor relevance. These results provide evidence of barriers and hidden potentials towards optimization of routine ambulatory care for COPD patients in Germany.

Objective: The aim of the investigation was to compare patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection during 2020/2021 and 2022 with respect to the reason for hospitalization as well as severity of disease at admission, during follow-up and clinical outcomes.

Methods: The data of all patients patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection during the periods of interest were collected. Severity of disease at admission and during follow-up was compared in all patients who were hospitalized because of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Results: During the period of 2020 to 2021, overall n=1281 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were hospitalized as compared to n=580 in 2022. Of these, 90% and 42%, respectively, were admitted because of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The rates of nosocomial transmission increased from 5 to 18%. Severity of disease at admission and during follow-up was higher across all age groups in the first period. More patients were admitted to the ICU (25 versus 4%). Accordingly, hospital mortality was higher (17 versus 10%). Intubated patients had a high mortality of 74 and 80%, respectively, in both periods.

Conclusions: The severity at admission and during follow-up was much higher in the first period. In the second period, the burden of health care systems was only in part driven by disease severity but more by the need for isolation and nosocomial infections. Mortality of intubated patients was high.