Pleura and Peritoneum最新文献

Objectives: The Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is designed to achieve faster recovery by maintaining pre-operative organ function and reducing stress response following surgery. A two part ERAS guidelines specific for Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) was recently published with intent of extending the benefit to patients with peritoneal surface malignancies. This survey was performed to examine clinicians' knowledge, practice and obstacles about ERAS implementation in patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC.

Methods: Requests to participate in survey of ERAS practices were sent to 238 members of Indian Society of Peritoneal Surface malignancies (ISPSM) via email. They were requested to answer a 37-item questionnaire on elements of preoperative (n=7), intraoperative (n=10) and postoperative (n=11) practices. It also queried demographic information and individual attitudes to ERAS.

Results: Data from 164 respondents were analysed. 27.4 % were aware of the formal ERAS protocol for CRS and HIPEC. 88.4 % of respondents reported implementing ERAS practices for CRS and HIPEC either, completely (20.7 %) or partially (67.7 %). The adherence to the protocol among the respondents were as follows: pre operative (55.5-97.6 %), intra operative (32.6-84.8 %) and post operative (25.6-89 %). While most respondents considered implementation of ERAS for CRS and HIPEC in the present format, 34.1 % felt certain aspects of perioperative practice have potential for improvement. The main barriers to implementation were difficulty in adhering to all elements (65.2 %), insufficient evidence to apply in clinical practice (32.4 %), safety concerns (50.6 %) and administrative issues (47.6 %).

Conclusions: Majority agreed the implementation of ERAS guidelines is beneficial but are followed by HIPEC centres partially. Efforts are required to overcome barriers like improving certain aspects of perioperative practice to increase the adherence, confirming the benefit and safety of protocol with level I evidence and solving administrative issues by setting up dedicated multi-disciplinary ERAS teams.

Objectives: The peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS) is a four-tied pathologic score measuring tumor regression in biopsies from patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) receiving chemotherapy.

Methods: This retrospective analysis of a prospective registry (NCT03210298) analyses 97 patients with isolated PM under palliative chemotherapy. We examined the predictive value of the initial PRGS for overall survival (OS) and the prognostic value of PRGS in repeated peritoneal biopsies.

Results: The 36 (37.1 %) patients with an initial mean PRGS≤2 had a longer median OS (12.1 months, CI 95 % 7.8-16.4) vs. 8.0 months (CI 95 % 5.1-10.8 months) in 61 (62.9 %) patients with PRGS≥3 (p=0.02) After stratification, the initial PRGS was an independent predictor of OS (Cox-regression, p<0.05). Out of 62 patients receiving≥two chemotherapy cycles, 42 (67.7 %) had a histological response (defined as a lower or stable mean PRGS in successive therapy cycles), and 20 (32.3 %) progressed (defined as an increasing mean PRGS). PRGS response was associated with a longer median OS (14.6 months, CI 5-95 % 6.0-23.2) vs. 6.9 (CI 5-95 % 0.0-15.9) months. PRGS response was prognostic in the univariate analysis (p=0.017). Thus, PRGS had both a predictive and prognostic significance in patients with isolated PM receiving palliative chemotherapy in this patient cohort.

Conclusions: This is the first evidence for the independent predictive and prognostic significance of PRGS in PM. These encouraging results need validation in an adequately powered, prospective study.

Objectives: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) gives encouraging results in the treatment of peritoneal metastasis (PM). The current recommendations require at least 3 sessions of PIPAC. However, some patients do not complete the full treatment course and stop after only 1 or 2 procedures, hence the limited benefit. A literature review was performed, with search terms including "PIPAC" and "pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy."

Content: Only articles describing the causes for premature termination of the PIPAC treatment were analysed. The systematic search identified 26 published clinical articles related to PIPAC and reporting causes for stopping PIPAC.

Summary: The series range from 11 to 144 patients, with a total of 1352 patients treated with PIPAC for various tumours. A total of 3088 PIPAC treatments were performed. The median number of PIPAC treatments per patient was 2.1, the median PCI score at the time of the first PIPAC was 19 and the number of patients who did not complete the recommended 3 sessions of PIPAC was 714 (52.8%). Disease progression was the main reason for early termination of the PIPAC treatment (49.1%). The other causes were death, patients' wishes, adverse events, conversion to curative cytoreductive surgery and other medical reasons (embolism, pulmonary infection, etc…).

Outlook: Further investigations are necessary to better understand the causes for interrupting PIPAC treatment and also improving the selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from PIPAC.

Objectives: Current recommendations regarding enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) after complete cytoreductive surgery (CCRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are based on a low level of evidence. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of implementing an adapted ERP for CCRS and HIPEC in a referral center.

Methods: We conducted a study with a prospective group of 44 patients (post-ERP group) who underwent CCRS with HIPEC between July 2016 and June 2018, the period during which ERP was implemented. This group was compared to a second retrospective group of 21 patients who underwent CCRS with HIPEC between June 2015 and June 2016, during which ERP was not yet implemented (pre-ERP group).

Results: The ERP compliance rate was 65% in the post-ERP group. The hospital length of stay (HLS) was shorter in the post-ERP group: 24.9 days (IQR 11-68, pre-ERP group) vs. 16.1 days (IQR 6-45, post-ERP group), as was the major morbidity rate (pre-ERP group=33.3% vs. post-ERP group=20.5%). The nasogastric tube, urinary catheter and abdominal drains were all retrieved faster in the post-ERP group.

Conclusions: The implementation of an adapted ERP after CCRS with HIPEC procedures reduces morbidity and shortens the HLS.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to analyze the prevalence of somatic mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in malignant mesothelioma and their putative impact on protein properties.

Methods: Eighteen cases of malignant mesothelioma were retrieved from the archives and for next generation sequencing analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Variants were analyzed using Ensembl VEP17, Polyphen 2.0 software, SIFT software, MutpredV2, and SWISS-MODEL homology-modeling pipeline server.

Results: BRCA2 variants were found in significantly higher percentage (22%) of cases (p=0.02). Five missense variants were identified. These were p.A2351P, p.T2250A, p.A895V, pG1771D, and p.R2034C. The SIFT scores of all except one were ≥ 0.03. The Polyphen scores of these four alterations were ≤0.899. In case of p.A2315, the SIFT score was 0.01, while the Polyphen 2 score was 0.921. MutPred2 scores were ≤0.180 for all. Loss of intrinsic disorder was predicted (Pr=0.32, p=0.07) for p.R2034C, while gain of intrinsic disorder was predicted for p.A2351P (Pr=0.36, p=0.01) and p.G1771D (Pr=0.34, p=0.02).

Conclusions: BRCA2 somatic variants were identified in 22% cases of malignant mesotheliomas in this study. The variants localize more frequently to the disordered regions of the protein and are predicted to affect the level of disorder.

Objectives: Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare cancer currently affecting over 11,736 patients across Europe. Since PMP is so uncommon, collaboration between scientific centers is key to discovering the mechanisms behind the disease, efficient treatments, and targets pointing to a cure. To date, no consensus has been reached on the minimum data that should be collected during PMP research studies. This issue has become more important as biobanking becomes the norm. This paper begins the discussion around a minimum data set that should be collected by researchers through a review of available clinical trial reports in order to facilitate collaborative efforts within the PMP research community.

Content: A review of articles from PubMed, CenterWatch, ClinicalTrials.gov and MedRxiv was undertaken, and clinical trials reporting PMP results selected.

Summary: There is a core set of data that researchers report, including age and sex, overall survival, peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score, and completeness of cytoreduction, but after this, reports become variable.

Outlook: Since PMP is a rare disease, it is important that reports include as large of a number of standardised data points as possible. Our research indicates that there is still much ground to cover before this becomes a reality.

Objectives: Up to one quarter of the patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) develop peritoneal carcinomatosis (PM). The aims of this retrospective study were to characterize the histological response of the PM of CRC to preoperative chemotherapy and evaluate the potential prognostic value, in terms of survival.

Methods: This retrospective unicentric study evaluated a group of 30 patients treated between 2010 and 2020 at the São João University Hospital Center with preoperative chemotherapy, followed by cytoreduction surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. The evaluation of the histological response was done using two scores: the tumor regression grading (TRG) and the peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS).

Results: Mean post-procedure survival is higher in the PRGS 1-2 group (74.19 months) vs. the PRGS 3-4 group (25.27 months) (p=0.045), as well as in the TRG 1-2 group (74.58 months) vs. TRG 4-5 (25.27 months) (p=0.032). As for progression-free survival (PFS), the PRGS 1-2 group had a mean value of 58.03 months vs. PRGS 3-4 which had 11.67 months (p=0.002). Similar was observed with the TRG 1-2 group, which had a mean PFS of 61.68 months vs. TRG 4-5 with 11.67 months (p=0.003).

Conclusions: A better histological response to preoperative chemotherapy, represented as a lower PRGS and TRG value, is associated with longer post-procedure survival and progression-free survival in this group of patients. That is, these two scores have prognostic value.