首页 > 最新文献

Pleura and Peritoneum最新文献

英文 中文
ISSPP CONGRESS 2022 3RD CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF PLEURA AND PERITONEUM. 国际胸膜和腹膜研究学会第三届大会。
IF 1.8 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2023-0010
.
{"title":"ISSPP CONGRESS 2022 3RD CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF PLEURA AND PERITONEUM.","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/pp-2023-0010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2023-0010","url":null,"abstract":".","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067550/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9307236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Erector spinae plane blocks for day-case medical thoracoscopy: a pilot clinical study. 直立者脊柱平面块用于日间医学胸腔镜检查:一项试点临床研究。
IF 1.8 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2022-0115
Jamie McPherson, Edward Halvey, Avinash Aujayeb

Objectives: Erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks are a regional anaesthetic technique used for pain relief in thoracic procedures. Our centre has recently begun using ESP blocks pre-medical thoracoscopy for analgesia.

Methods: Nine patients undergoing MT from September 2021 to February 2022 were included. Opioid use and depth of required sedation was recorded. Pre and post pain scores and at home were recorded by interview and review of charts. A functional pain questionnaire was administered via telephone.

Results: Average greatest depth of sedation using propofol was 1.92 (standard error of mean [SEM] 0.27), with remifentanil 2.52 (SEM 0.46). 78% required oral analgesia on day 0 post discharge. 55% required oral analgesia on post-op day 1. Patients used an average of 3.33 mg oral morphine (SEM 2.35) in hospital, and 3 mg (SEM 2) on post-op day 1. Periprocedural pain scores were 0.66 (SEM 0.27). Pain scores in recovery were 1.56 (SEM 0.76). Pain scores 3-12 h post discharge were 3.56 (SEM 0.7), while pain scores on post-op day 1 were significantly higher at 5.56 (SEM 0.90) (Figure 1). Functional pain scoring showed patients doing activities of daily living well with a good ability to breathe and cough. All felt that their pain was well controlled on the day of the procedure and at home. No complications were reported.

Conclusions: ESP blocks provide good analgesia. Pain scores showed significant analgesic effect lasting several hours. The project showed pain outcomes and patient acceptability were good for the use of regional anaesthesia.

目的:竖脊平面(ESP)阻滞是一种用于胸部手术疼痛缓解的区域麻醉技术。我们中心最近开始使用ESP块进行医学前胸腔镜镇痛。方法:纳入2021年9月至2022年2月接受MT治疗的9例患者。记录阿片类药物的使用和所需镇静的深度。通过访谈和查阅图表的方式记录疼痛前后和在家时的评分。通过电话进行功能性疼痛问卷调查。结果:异丙酚的平均最大镇静深度为1.92(平均标准误差[SEM] 0.27),瑞芬太尼为2.52(平均标准误差[SEM] 0.46)。78%的患者出院后第0天需要口服镇痛。55%的患者术后第1天需要口服镇痛。患者住院时平均口服吗啡3.33 mg (SEM 2.35),术后第1天平均口服吗啡3 mg (SEM 2)。围手术期疼痛评分为0.66 (SEM 0.27)。康复期疼痛评分为1.56分(SEM 0.76)。出院后3-12小时的疼痛评分为3.56 (SEM为0.7),而术后第1天的疼痛评分明显更高,为5.56 (SEM为0.90)(图1)。功能性疼痛评分显示患者日常生活活动良好,呼吸和咳嗽能力良好。所有人在手术当天和在家时都感到疼痛得到了很好的控制。无并发症报道。结论:ESP阻滞具有良好的镇痛效果。疼痛评分显示镇痛效果显著,持续数小时。该项目显示疼痛结局和患者接受程度良好的区域麻醉的使用。
{"title":"Erector spinae plane blocks for day-case medical thoracoscopy: a pilot clinical study.","authors":"Jamie McPherson,&nbsp;Edward Halvey,&nbsp;Avinash Aujayeb","doi":"10.1515/pp-2022-0115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2022-0115","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks are a regional anaesthetic technique used for pain relief in thoracic procedures. Our centre has recently begun using ESP blocks pre-medical thoracoscopy for analgesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine patients undergoing MT from September 2021 to February 2022 were included. Opioid use and depth of required sedation was recorded. Pre and post pain scores and at home were recorded by interview and review of charts. A functional pain questionnaire was administered via telephone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average greatest depth of sedation using propofol was 1.92 (standard error of mean [SEM] 0.27), with remifentanil 2.52 (SEM 0.46). 78% required oral analgesia on day 0 post discharge. 55% required oral analgesia on post-op day 1. Patients used an average of 3.33 mg oral morphine (SEM 2.35) in hospital, and 3 mg (SEM 2) on post-op day 1. Periprocedural pain scores were 0.66 (SEM 0.27). Pain scores in recovery were 1.56 (SEM 0.76). Pain scores 3-12 h post discharge were 3.56 (SEM 0.7), while pain scores on post-op day 1 were significantly higher at 5.56 (SEM 0.90) (Figure 1). Functional pain scoring showed patients doing activities of daily living well with a good ability to breathe and cough. All felt that their pain was well controlled on the day of the procedure and at home. No complications were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ESP blocks provide good analgesia. Pain scores showed significant analgesic effect lasting several hours. The project showed pain outcomes and patient acceptability were good for the use of regional anaesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9742453/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10788490","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Cytologic features of epithelioid gastrointestinal stromal tumor in a pleural effusion. A diagnostic challenge. 胸腔积液中上皮样胃肠道间质瘤的细胞学特征。诊断上的挑战。
IF 1.8 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2022-0196
Mariel Valdivia-Mazeira, Carlos Gordillo, Zehra Avan, Lidia Castillo-Gázquez, José A Jiménez-Heffernan
{"title":"Cytologic features of epithelioid gastrointestinal stromal tumor in a pleural effusion. A diagnostic challenge.","authors":"Mariel Valdivia-Mazeira,&nbsp;Carlos Gordillo,&nbsp;Zehra Avan,&nbsp;Lidia Castillo-Gázquez,&nbsp;José A Jiménez-Heffernan","doi":"10.1515/pp-2022-0196","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2022-0196","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9742452/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10788491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in small bowel adenocarcinoma with peritoneal metastasis: a systematic review. 细胞减少手术(CRS)和腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)治疗伴有腹膜转移的小肠腺癌:一项系统综述。
IF 1.8 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2022-0121
Vicky Chen, Morgan Jones, Lauren Cohen, Wilson Yang, Jasman Bedi, Helen M Mohan, Sameer S Apte, José Tomas Larach, Michael Flood, Alexander Heriot, Joseph Kong, Satish Warrier

Objectives: Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) with peritoneal metastasis (PM) is rare and despite treatment with systemic chemotherapy, the prognosis is poor. However, there is emerging evidence that cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) may offer a survival benefit over systemic therapy alone. This systematic review will assess the effectiveness of CRS-HIPEC for SBA-PM.

Content: Three databases were searched from inception to 11/10/21. Clinical outcomes were extracted and analysed.

Summary: A total of 164 cases of SBA-PM undergoing CRS-HIPEC were identified in 12 studies. The majority of patients had neoadjuvant chemotherapy (87/164, 53%) and complete cytoreduction (143/164, 87%) prior to HIPEC. The median overall survival was 9-32 months and 5-year survival ranged from 25 to 40%. Clavien-Dindo grade III/IV morbidity ranged between 19.1 and 50%, while overall mortality was low with only 3 treatment-related deaths.

Outlook: CRS-HIPEC has the potential to improve the overall survival in a highly selected group of SBA-PM patients, with 5-year survival rates comparable to those reported in colorectal peritoneal metastases. However, the expected survival benefits need to be balanced against the intrinsic risk of morbidity and mortality associated with the procedure. Further multicentre studies are required to assess the safety and feasibility of CRS-HIPEC in SBA-PM to guide best practice management for this rare disease.

目的:小肠腺癌(SBA)合并腹膜转移(PM)是一种罕见的疾病,尽管接受了全身化疗,但预后较差。然而,越来越多的证据表明,细胞减少手术(CRS)联合腹腔内高温化疗(HIPEC)可能比单独全身治疗更能提高患者的生存率。本系统综述将评估CRS-HIPEC治疗SBA-PM的有效性。内容:检索三个数据库,从成立到11/10/21。提取临床结果并进行分析。总结:12项研究共发现164例SBA-PM行CRS-HIPEC。大多数患者在HIPEC前进行了新辅助化疗(87/164,53%)和完全细胞减少(143/164,87%)。中位总生存期为9-32个月,5年生存率为25% - 40%。Clavien-Dindo III/IV级发病率在19.1%至50%之间,而总体死亡率较低,只有3例与治疗相关的死亡。展望:CRS-HIPEC有可能提高SBA-PM患者的总生存率,其5年生存率与结肠直肠腹膜转移患者相当。然而,预期的生存益处需要与手术相关的发病率和死亡率的内在风险相平衡。需要进一步的多中心研究来评估CRS-HIPEC在SBA-PM中的安全性和可行性,以指导这种罕见疾病的最佳实践管理。
{"title":"Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in small bowel adenocarcinoma with peritoneal metastasis: a systematic review.","authors":"Vicky Chen,&nbsp;Morgan Jones,&nbsp;Lauren Cohen,&nbsp;Wilson Yang,&nbsp;Jasman Bedi,&nbsp;Helen M Mohan,&nbsp;Sameer S Apte,&nbsp;José Tomas Larach,&nbsp;Michael Flood,&nbsp;Alexander Heriot,&nbsp;Joseph Kong,&nbsp;Satish Warrier","doi":"10.1515/pp-2022-0121","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2022-0121","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) with peritoneal metastasis (PM) is rare and despite treatment with systemic chemotherapy, the prognosis is poor. However, there is emerging evidence that cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) may offer a survival benefit over systemic therapy alone. This systematic review will assess the effectiveness of CRS-HIPEC for SBA-PM.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>Three databases were searched from inception to 11/10/21. Clinical outcomes were extracted and analysed.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>A total of 164 cases of SBA-PM undergoing CRS-HIPEC were identified in 12 studies. The majority of patients had neoadjuvant chemotherapy (87/164, 53%) and complete cytoreduction (143/164, 87%) prior to HIPEC. The median overall survival was 9-32 months and 5-year survival ranged from 25 to 40%. Clavien-Dindo grade III/IV morbidity ranged between 19.1 and 50%, while overall mortality was low with only 3 treatment-related deaths.</p><p><strong>Outlook: </strong>CRS-HIPEC has the potential to improve the overall survival in a highly selected group of SBA-PM patients, with 5-year survival rates comparable to those reported in colorectal peritoneal metastases. However, the expected survival benefits need to be balanced against the intrinsic risk of morbidity and mortality associated with the procedure. Further multicentre studies are required to assess the safety and feasibility of CRS-HIPEC in SBA-PM to guide best practice management for this rare disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9742456/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10788494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Multicenter dose-escalation Phase I trial of mitomycin C pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy in combination with systemic chemotherapy for appendiceal and colorectal peritoneal metastases: rationale and design. 丝裂霉素C加压腹腔内雾化化疗联合全身化疗治疗阑尾和结直肠腹膜转移的多中心剂量递增I期临床试验:原理和设计。
IF 1.8 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2022-0116
Mustafa Raoof, Kevin M Sullivan, Paul H Frankel, Marwan Fakih, Timothy W Synold, Dean Lim, Yanghee Woo, Isaac Benjamin Paz, Yuman Fong, Rebecca Meera Thomas, Sue Chang, Melissa Eng, Raechelle Tinsley, Richard L Whelan, Danielle Deperalta, Marc A Reymond, Jeremy Jones, Amit Merchea, Thanh H Dellinger

Objectives: Peritoneal metastasis (PM) from appendiceal cancer or colorectal cancer (CRC) has significant morbidity and limited survival. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a minimally invasive approach to treat PM. We aim to conduct a dose-escalation trial of mitomycin C (MMC)-PIPAC combined with systemic chemotherapy (FOLFIRI) in patients with PM from appendiceal cancer or CRC.

Methods: This is a multicenter Phase I study of MMC-PIPAC (NCT04329494). Inclusion criteria include treatment with at least 4 months of first- or second-line systemic chemotherapy with ineligibility for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). Exclusion criteria are: progression on chemotherapy; extraperitoneal metastases; systemic chemotherapy intolerance; bowel obstruction; or poor performance status (ECOG>2). Escalating MMC-PIPAC doses (7-25 mg/m2) will be administered in combination with standard dose systemic FOLFIRI. Safety evaluation will be performed on 15 patients (dose escalation) and six expansion patients: 21 evaluable patients total.

Results: The primary endpoints are recommended MMC dose and safety of MMC-PIPAC with FOLFIRI. Secondary endpoints are assessment of response (by peritoneal regression grade score; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST 1.1], and peritoneal carcinomatosis index), progression free survival, overall survival, technical failure rate, surgical complications, conversion to curative-intent CRS-HIPEC, patient-reported outcomes, and functional status. Longitudinal blood and tissue specimens will be collected for translational correlatives including pharmacokinetics, circulating biomarkers, immune profiling, and single-cell transcriptomics.

Conclusions: This Phase I trial will establish the recommended dose of MMC-PIPAC in combination with FOLFIRI. Additionally, we expect to detect an early efficacy signal for further development of this therapeutic combination.

目的:阑尾癌或结直肠癌(CRC)的腹膜转移(PM)发病率高,生存期有限。加压腹腔雾化化疗(PIPAC)是一种微创治疗PM的方法。我们的目标是在阑尾癌或结直肠癌的PM患者中进行丝裂霉素C (MMC)-PIPAC联合全身化疗(FOLFIRI)的剂量递增试验。方法:这是一项MMC-PIPAC (NCT04329494)的多中心I期研究。纳入标准包括至少4个月的一线或二线全身化疗,不适合细胞减少手术和腹腔热化疗(CRS-HIPEC)。排除标准为:化疗进展;extraperitoneal转移;全身化疗不耐受;肠阻塞;或表现不佳(ECOG>2)。逐渐增加的MMC-PIPAC剂量(7- 25mg /m2)将与标准剂量的全身FOLFIRI联合使用。将对15例患者(剂量递增)和6例扩展患者进行安全性评估:共21例可评估患者。结果:主要终点是MMC推荐剂量和MMC- pipac联合FOLFIRI的安全性。次要终点是疗效评估(通过腹膜回归分级评分;实体瘤的疗效评价标准[RECIST 1.1]和腹膜癌指数)、无进展生存期、总生存期、技术失败率、手术并发症、向治愈目的CRS-HIPEC的转化、患者报告的结果和功能状态。将收集纵向血液和组织标本进行翻译相关研究,包括药代动力学、循环生物标志物、免疫谱和单细胞转录组学。结论:这项I期试验将确定MMC-PIPAC联合FOLFIRI的推荐剂量。此外,我们希望发现早期疗效信号,以进一步开发这种治疗组合。
{"title":"Multicenter dose-escalation Phase I trial of mitomycin C pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy in combination with systemic chemotherapy for appendiceal and colorectal peritoneal metastases: rationale and design.","authors":"Mustafa Raoof,&nbsp;Kevin M Sullivan,&nbsp;Paul H Frankel,&nbsp;Marwan Fakih,&nbsp;Timothy W Synold,&nbsp;Dean Lim,&nbsp;Yanghee Woo,&nbsp;Isaac Benjamin Paz,&nbsp;Yuman Fong,&nbsp;Rebecca Meera Thomas,&nbsp;Sue Chang,&nbsp;Melissa Eng,&nbsp;Raechelle Tinsley,&nbsp;Richard L Whelan,&nbsp;Danielle Deperalta,&nbsp;Marc A Reymond,&nbsp;Jeremy Jones,&nbsp;Amit Merchea,&nbsp;Thanh H Dellinger","doi":"10.1515/pp-2022-0116","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2022-0116","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Peritoneal metastasis (PM) from appendiceal cancer or colorectal cancer (CRC) has significant morbidity and limited survival. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a minimally invasive approach to treat PM. We aim to conduct a dose-escalation trial of mitomycin C (MMC)-PIPAC combined with systemic chemotherapy (FOLFIRI) in patients with PM from appendiceal cancer or CRC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a multicenter Phase I study of MMC-PIPAC (NCT04329494). Inclusion criteria include treatment with at least 4 months of first- or second-line systemic chemotherapy with ineligibility for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). Exclusion criteria are: progression on chemotherapy; extraperitoneal metastases; systemic chemotherapy intolerance; bowel obstruction; or poor performance status (ECOG>2). Escalating MMC-PIPAC doses (7-25 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) will be administered in combination with standard dose systemic FOLFIRI. Safety evaluation will be performed on 15 patients (dose escalation) and six expansion patients: 21 evaluable patients total.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary endpoints are recommended MMC dose and safety of MMC-PIPAC with FOLFIRI. Secondary endpoints are assessment of response (by peritoneal regression grade score; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST 1.1], and peritoneal carcinomatosis index), progression free survival, overall survival, technical failure rate, surgical complications, conversion to curative-intent CRS-HIPEC, patient-reported outcomes, and functional status. Longitudinal blood and tissue specimens will be collected for translational correlatives including pharmacokinetics, circulating biomarkers, immune profiling, and single-cell transcriptomics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This Phase I trial will establish the recommended dose of MMC-PIPAC in combination with FOLFIRI. Additionally, we expect to detect an early efficacy signal for further development of this therapeutic combination.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9742457/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10275848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS) in peritoneal metastasis: how many biopsies should be examined? 腹膜转移的腹膜回归分级评分(PRGS):应该检查多少次活检?
IF 1.8 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2022-0118
Wiebke Solass, Christoph Meisner, Florian Kurtz, Giorgi Nadiradze, Marc A Reymond, Hans Bösmüller

Objectives: The four-tied peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS) is increasingly used to evaluate the response of peritoneal metastases (PM) to chemotherapy. The minimal number of peritoneal biopsies needed for PRGS determination remains unclear.

Methods: A prospective cohort of 89 PM patients treated with 210 pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) cycles was investigated. Four biopsies from every abdominal quadrant were recommended. Histological tumor response was defined as a stable or decreasing mean PRGS between therapy cycles, progression increasing. We compared the diagnostic uncertainty induced by missing biopsies to the histological response.

Results: A total of 49 patients had at least two PIPAC and were eligible for therapy response assessment. Mean PRGS decreased from 2.04 (CI 5-95% 1.85-2.27) to 1.79 (CI 5-95% 1.59-2.01), p=0.14, as a proof of therapy effectiveness. 35 (71.4%) patients had a stable or decreasing PRGS (therapy response), 14 (28.6%) a PRGS increase (disease progression). Histology showed agreement between four biopsies in 42/210 laparoscopies (20%), between ≥3 biopsies in 103 (49%), and between ≥2 biopsies in 169 laparoscopies (81%). Mean loss of information with one missing biopsy was 0.11 (95% CI=0.13) PRGS points, with two missing biopsies 0.18 (95% CI 0.21). In 9/49 patients (18.3%), the loss of information with one less biopsy exceeded the change in PRGS under therapy.

Conclusions: A minimum of three biopsies is needed to diagnose PM progression with an accuracy superior to 80%. Missing biopsies often result in a false diagnosis of tumor progression.

目的:四联腹膜回归分级评分(PRGS)越来越多地用于评估腹膜转移(PM)对化疗的反应。测定PRGS所需的腹膜活检的最少次数尚不清楚。方法:对89例接受210个周期加压腹腔内气溶胶化疗(PIPAC)的PM患者进行前瞻性队列研究。建议每个腹部做四次活检。组织学肿瘤反应定义为治疗周期间平均PRGS稳定或下降,进展增加。我们比较了活检缺失引起的诊断不确定性和组织学反应。结果:共有49例患者至少接受两次PIPAC治疗,符合治疗反应评估的条件。平均PRGS从2.04 (CI 5-95% 1.85-2.27)下降到1.79 (CI 5-95% 1.59-2.01), p=0.14,证明了治疗的有效性。35例(71.4%)患者PRGS稳定或下降(治疗反应),14例(28.6%)PRGS增加(疾病进展)。在42/210例腹腔镜检查中,活检4例(20%),活检≥3例(103例)(49%),活检≥2例(169例)(81%),组织学一致。一次活检缺失的平均信息损失为0.11 (95% CI=0.13) PRGS点,两次活检缺失的平均信息损失为0.18 (95% CI 0.21)。在9/49例患者(18.3%)中,减少一次活检导致的信息丢失超过了治疗期间PRGS的变化。结论:诊断PM进展至少需要三次活检,准确率超过80%。缺少活组织检查常常导致对肿瘤进展的错误诊断。
{"title":"Peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS) in peritoneal metastasis: how many biopsies should be examined?","authors":"Wiebke Solass,&nbsp;Christoph Meisner,&nbsp;Florian Kurtz,&nbsp;Giorgi Nadiradze,&nbsp;Marc A Reymond,&nbsp;Hans Bösmüller","doi":"10.1515/pp-2022-0118","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2022-0118","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The four-tied peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS) is increasingly used to evaluate the response of peritoneal metastases (PM) to chemotherapy. The minimal number of peritoneal biopsies needed for PRGS determination remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort of 89 PM patients treated with 210 pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) cycles was investigated. Four biopsies from every abdominal quadrant were recommended. Histological tumor response was defined as a stable or decreasing mean PRGS between therapy cycles, progression increasing. We compared the diagnostic uncertainty induced by missing biopsies to the histological response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 49 patients had at least two PIPAC and were eligible for therapy response assessment. Mean PRGS decreased from 2.04 (CI 5-95% 1.85-2.27) to 1.79 (CI 5-95% 1.59-2.01), p=0.14, as a proof of therapy effectiveness. 35 (71.4%) patients had a stable or decreasing PRGS (therapy response), 14 (28.6%) a PRGS increase (disease progression). Histology showed agreement between four biopsies in 42/210 laparoscopies (20%), between ≥3 biopsies in 103 (49%), and between ≥2 biopsies in 169 laparoscopies (81%). Mean loss of information with one missing biopsy was 0.11 (95% CI=0.13) PRGS points, with two missing biopsies 0.18 (95% CI 0.21). In 9/49 patients (18.3%), the loss of information with one less biopsy exceeded the change in PRGS under therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A minimum of three biopsies is needed to diagnose PM progression with an accuracy superior to 80%. Missing biopsies often result in a false diagnosis of tumor progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9742454/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10788489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Peritoneal metastases of unknown primary with hepatoid features. 原发不明伴肝样特征的腹膜转移灶。
IF 1.8 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-08-19 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2022-0113
Lakhdar Khellaf, Stéphanie Nougaret, Sébastien Carrère, Frédéric Bibeau
A 59-year-old woman presented with isolated peritoneal metastases in the context of elevated serum AFP levels (Figure 1A and B). No primary tumour was found, notably from the liver, the gastrointestinal or gynecological tracts. A laparoscopic assessment reported a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) reaching 22/39 and biopsies performed disclosed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A chemotherapy followed by Figure 1: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver and peritoneum (axial T2 weighted images). (A) Initial MRI: ill-defined T2 hyperintense nodule within the falciform ligament of the liver (arrow). (B) MRI at 3 months: Appearance of several peritoneal metastases (arrows). Note the absence of any parenchymal liver tumour in both images. (C) Histopathological analysis: hepatocellular carcinoma (asterisks) in the falciform ligament of the liver, representing the starting point of the peritoneal disease. Ectopic liver is circled in red (greater axis: 15 mm), with detectable steatosis (HES, ×6). Note the independent vasculo-biliary stalk, highlighted in the inset (HES, ×50). HES: hematoxylin-eosin-saffron.
{"title":"Peritoneal metastases of unknown primary with hepatoid features.","authors":"Lakhdar Khellaf,&nbsp;Stéphanie Nougaret,&nbsp;Sébastien Carrère,&nbsp;Frédéric Bibeau","doi":"10.1515/pp-2022-0113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2022-0113","url":null,"abstract":"A 59-year-old woman presented with isolated peritoneal metastases in the context of elevated serum AFP levels (Figure 1A and B). No primary tumour was found, notably from the liver, the gastrointestinal or gynecological tracts. A laparoscopic assessment reported a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) reaching 22/39 and biopsies performed disclosed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A chemotherapy followed by Figure 1: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver and peritoneum (axial T2 weighted images). (A) Initial MRI: ill-defined T2 hyperintense nodule within the falciform ligament of the liver (arrow). (B) MRI at 3 months: Appearance of several peritoneal metastases (arrows). Note the absence of any parenchymal liver tumour in both images. (C) Histopathological analysis: hepatocellular carcinoma (asterisks) in the falciform ligament of the liver, representing the starting point of the peritoneal disease. Ectopic liver is circled in red (greater axis: 15 mm), with detectable steatosis (HES, ×6). Note the independent vasculo-biliary stalk, highlighted in the inset (HES, ×50). HES: hematoxylin-eosin-saffron.","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467897/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33484287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Role of prophylactic HIPEC in non-metastatic, serosa-invasive gastric cancer: a literature review. 预防性HIPEC在非转移性浆膜浸润性胃癌中的作用:文献综述。
IF 1.8 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-07-04 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2022-0104
Aditya R Kunte, Aamir M Parray, Manish S Bhandare, Sohan Lal Solanki

The role of prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (p-HIPEC) in serosa invasive gastric cancers without gross or microscopic peritoneal disease, to reduce the rate of peritoneal relapse is an area of ongoing research. Although p-HIPEC is effective in reducing the rate of peritoneal relapse and improving disease free and overall survival with or without adjuvant chemotherapy, when added to curative surgery in locally advanced, non-metastatic gastric cancers, the available literature is at best, heterogeneous, centre-specific and skewed. Apart from that, variations in the systemic therapy used, and the presence of the associated nodal disease further complicate this picture. To evaluate the role of p-HIPEC the PubMed, Cochrane central register of clinical trials, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting library were searched with the search terms, "gastric", "cancer", "hyperthermic", "intraperitoneal", "chemotherapy", prophylactic", "HIPEC" in various combinations, and a critical review of the available evidence was done. Although p-HIPEC is a promising therapy in the management of locally advanced gastric cancers, the current evidence is insufficient to recommend its inclusion into routine clinical practice. Future research should be directed towards identification of the appropriate patient subset and towards redefining its role with current peri-operative systemic therapies.

预防性腹腔热化疗(p-HIPEC)在无肉眼或显微镜下腹膜病变的浆膜浸润性胃癌中降低腹膜复发率的作用是一个正在进行的研究领域。虽然p-HIPEC在降低腹膜复发率、提高无病生存期和总生存期(伴或不伴辅助化疗)方面是有效的,但当在局部晚期、非转移性胃癌中加入根治性手术时,现有文献最多只能是异质性、中心特异性和偏斜的。除此之外,所使用的全身治疗的差异以及相关淋巴结疾病的存在使这一情况进一步复杂化。为了评估p-HIPEC的作用,我们检索了PubMed、Cochrane临床试验中心注册库和美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)会议库,检索词为“胃”、“癌症”、“热疗”、“腹腔内”、“化疗”、“预防性”、“HIPEC”的各种组合,并对现有证据进行了批判性回顾。尽管p-HIPEC在局部晚期胃癌的治疗中是一种很有前景的治疗方法,但目前的证据不足以推荐将其纳入常规临床实践。未来的研究应着眼于确定合适的患者亚群,并重新定义其在当前围手术期全身治疗中的作用。
{"title":"Role of prophylactic HIPEC in non-metastatic, serosa-invasive gastric cancer: a literature review.","authors":"Aditya R Kunte,&nbsp;Aamir M Parray,&nbsp;Manish S Bhandare,&nbsp;Sohan Lal Solanki","doi":"10.1515/pp-2022-0104","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2022-0104","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The role of prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (p-HIPEC) in serosa invasive gastric cancers without gross or microscopic peritoneal disease, to reduce the rate of peritoneal relapse is an area of ongoing research. Although p-HIPEC is effective in reducing the rate of peritoneal relapse and improving disease free and overall survival with or without adjuvant chemotherapy, when added to curative surgery in locally advanced, non-metastatic gastric cancers, the available literature is at best, heterogeneous, centre-specific and skewed. Apart from that, variations in the systemic therapy used, and the presence of the associated nodal disease further complicate this picture. To evaluate the role of p-HIPEC the PubMed, Cochrane central register of clinical trials, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting library were searched with the search terms, \"gastric\", \"cancer\", \"hyperthermic\", \"intraperitoneal\", \"chemotherapy\", prophylactic\", \"HIPEC\" in various combinations, and a critical review of the available evidence was done. Although p-HIPEC is a promising therapy in the management of locally advanced gastric cancers, the current evidence is insufficient to recommend its inclusion into routine clinical practice. Future research should be directed towards identification of the appropriate patient subset and towards redefining its role with current peri-operative systemic therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467900/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33484284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in multimodal therapy for patients with oligometastatic peritoneal gastric cancer: a randomized multicenter phase III trial PIPAC VEROne. 加压腹腔内气溶胶化疗(PIPAC)在多模式治疗低转移性腹膜胃癌患者:一项随机多中心III期试验PIPAC VEROne
IF 1.8 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-06-07 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2022-0111
Francesco Casella, Maria Bencivenga, Riccardo Rosati, Uberto Romario Fumagalli, Daniele Marrelli, Fabio Pacelli, Antonio Macrì, Annibale Donini, Lorena Torroni, Michele Pavarana, Giovanni De Manzoni

Objectives: Peritoneal carcinomatosis is the most frequent site of metastases in patients with gastric cancer. Current standard treatment is palliative systemic chemotherapy with very poor prognosis. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) resulted in long-term benefits in selected patients. Among patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, a distinctive subset is oligometastatic disease which is characterized by low metastatic burden. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a recent technique of intraperitoneal chemotherapy used in combination with systemic chemotherapy with promising results.

Methods: PIPAC VER-One is a prospective, randomized, multicenter phase III clinical trial that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of PIPAC in combination with systemic chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer and synchronous positive peritoneal cytology and/or limited peritoneal metastases (peritoneal cancer index [PCI] ≤6). Patients will be randomized into two arms: arm A (control) treated with standard systemic chemotherapy and arm B (experimental) treated with a bidirectional scheme including PIPAC and systemic chemotherapy.

Results: Primary endpoint is the secondary resectability rate. Secondary endpoints are: overall survival (OS), pregression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), histological response assessed both on primary tumor and peritoneal lesions, quality of life (QoL), complication rate (CTCAE v5), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER).

Conclusions: The role of PIPAC in multimodal treatment for oligometastatic gastric cancer will be investigated in this trial.

目的:腹膜癌是胃癌患者最常见的转移部位。目前的标准治疗是姑息性全身化疗,预后很差。细胞减少手术(CRS)联合腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)对选定的患者有长期的益处。在腹膜癌患者中,一个独特的亚群是低转移性疾病,其特征是低转移负担。加压腹腔气溶胶化疗(PIPAC)是近年来腹腔化疗与全身化疗联合使用的一种新技术,具有良好的效果。方法:PIPAC er - one是一项前瞻性、随机、多中心III期临床试验,旨在评估PIPAC联合全身化疗对胃癌伴腹膜细胞学同步阳性和/或局限性腹膜转移(腹膜癌指数[PCI]≤6)患者的疗效。患者将随机分为两组:A组(对照组)接受标准全身化疗,B组(实验组)接受双向方案,包括PIPAC和全身化疗。结果:主要终点为二次可切除率。次要终点是:总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、无病生存期(DFS)、原发肿瘤和腹膜病变的组织学反应、生活质量(QoL)、并发症发生率(CTCAE v5)和增量成本-效果比(ICER)。结论:本试验将探讨PIPAC在低转移性胃癌多模式治疗中的作用。
{"title":"Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in multimodal therapy for patients with oligometastatic peritoneal gastric cancer: a randomized multicenter phase III trial PIPAC VEROne.","authors":"Francesco Casella,&nbsp;Maria Bencivenga,&nbsp;Riccardo Rosati,&nbsp;Uberto Romario Fumagalli,&nbsp;Daniele Marrelli,&nbsp;Fabio Pacelli,&nbsp;Antonio Macrì,&nbsp;Annibale Donini,&nbsp;Lorena Torroni,&nbsp;Michele Pavarana,&nbsp;Giovanni De Manzoni","doi":"10.1515/pp-2022-0111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2022-0111","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Peritoneal carcinomatosis is the most frequent site of metastases in patients with gastric cancer. Current standard treatment is palliative systemic chemotherapy with very poor prognosis. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) resulted in long-term benefits in selected patients. Among patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, a distinctive subset is oligometastatic disease which is characterized by low metastatic burden. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a recent technique of intraperitoneal chemotherapy used in combination with systemic chemotherapy with promising results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PIPAC VER-One is a prospective, randomized, multicenter phase III clinical trial that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of PIPAC in combination with systemic chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer and synchronous positive peritoneal cytology and/or limited peritoneal metastases (peritoneal cancer index [PCI] ≤6). Patients will be randomized into two arms: arm A (control) treated with standard systemic chemotherapy and arm B (experimental) treated with a bidirectional scheme including PIPAC and systemic chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Primary endpoint is the secondary resectability rate. Secondary endpoints are: overall survival (OS), pregression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), histological response assessed both on primary tumor and peritoneal lesions, quality of life (QoL), complication rate (CTCAE v5), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The role of PIPAC in multimodal treatment for oligometastatic gastric cancer will be investigated in this trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467896/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33484288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abdominal tissue concentrations and penetration of carboplatin in a HIPEC procedure ‒ assessment in a novel porcine model. 腹部组织浓度和卡铂在HIPEC过程中的渗透-在一种新型猪模型中的评估。
IF 1.8 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-06-06 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2022-0110
Elisabeth K Petersen, Mats Bue, Christina Harlev, Andrea R Jørgensen, Anne Schmedes, Pelle Hanberg, Lone K Petersen, Maiken Stilling

Objectives: Peritoneal dissemination from intraabdominal cancers is associated with poor prognosis and rapid disease progression. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an antineoplastic treatment, which has improved survival and recurrence-free survival, but little is known about the acquired chemotherapy concentrations in local tissues. The aim of this study was to assess concentrations of carboplatin during and after HIPEC treatment dynamically and simultaneously in various abdominal organ tissues by means of microdialysis in a novel porcine model.

Methods: Eight pigs underwent imitation cytoreductive surgery followed by HIPEC (90 min) using a carboplatin dosage of 800 mg/m2. Microdialysis catheters were placed for sampling of drug concentrations in various solid tissues: peritoneum, liver, bladder wall, mesentery and in different depths of one mm and four mm in the hepatoduodenal ligament and rectum. During and after HIPEC, dialysates and blood samples were collected over 8 h.

Results: No statistically significant differences in mean AUC0-last (range: 2,657-5,176 min·µg/mL), mean Cmax (range: 10.6-26.0 µg/mL) and mean Tmax (range: 105-206 min) were found between the compartments. In plasma there was a tendency towards lower measures. No difference between compartments was found for tissue penetration. At the last samples obtained (450 min) the mean carboplatin concentrations were 4.9-9.9 µg/mL across the investigated solid tissues.

Conclusions: Equal carboplatin distribution in abdominal organ tissues, detectable concentrations for at least 6 h after HIPEC completion, and a carboplatin penetration depth of minimum four mm were found. The present study proposes a new HIPEC porcine model for future research.

目的:腹内癌的腹膜播散与预后不良和疾病进展迅速有关。高温腹腔化疗(HIPEC)是一种抗肿瘤治疗方法,可提高患者的生存和无复发生存,但对局部组织获得性化疗浓度知之甚少。本研究的目的是在一种新型猪模型中,通过微透析的方法动态并同时评估HIPEC治疗期间和之后卡铂在各种腹部器官组织中的浓度。方法:8头猪接受模拟细胞减少手术后HIPEC (90 min),卡铂剂量为800 mg/m2。在腹膜、肝脏、膀胱壁、肠系膜以及肝十二指肠韧带和直肠1 mm和4 mm的不同深度放置微透析导管,取样药物浓度。在HIPEC期间和之后,在8 h内收集透析液和血液样本。结果:室间平均AUC0-last(范围:2,657-5,176 min·µg/mL),平均Cmax(范围:10.6-26.0µg/mL)和平均Tmax(范围:105-206 min)无统计学差异。在血浆中,有降低测量值的趋势。在组织渗透方面,室间没有发现差异。在最后获得的样品(450分钟)中,在所研究的固体组织中卡铂的平均浓度为4.9-9.9µg/mL。结论:卡铂在腹部器官组织中分布均匀,HIPEC完成后至少6小时可检测到卡铂浓度,卡铂穿透深度至少为4 mm。本研究为今后的研究提出了一种新的HIPEC猪模型。
{"title":"Abdominal tissue concentrations and penetration of carboplatin in a HIPEC procedure ‒ assessment in a novel porcine model.","authors":"Elisabeth K Petersen,&nbsp;Mats Bue,&nbsp;Christina Harlev,&nbsp;Andrea R Jørgensen,&nbsp;Anne Schmedes,&nbsp;Pelle Hanberg,&nbsp;Lone K Petersen,&nbsp;Maiken Stilling","doi":"10.1515/pp-2022-0110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2022-0110","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Peritoneal dissemination from intraabdominal cancers is associated with poor prognosis and rapid disease progression. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an antineoplastic treatment, which has improved survival and recurrence-free survival, but little is known about the acquired chemotherapy concentrations in local tissues. The aim of this study was to assess concentrations of carboplatin during and after HIPEC treatment dynamically and simultaneously in various abdominal organ tissues by means of microdialysis in a novel porcine model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight pigs underwent imitation cytoreductive surgery followed by HIPEC (90 min) using a carboplatin dosage of 800 mg/m<sup>2</sup>. Microdialysis catheters were placed for sampling of drug concentrations in various solid tissues: peritoneum, liver, bladder wall, mesentery and in different depths of one mm and four mm in the hepatoduodenal ligament and rectum. During and after HIPEC, dialysates and blood samples were collected over 8 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences in mean AUC<sub>0-last</sub> (range: 2,657-5,176 min·µg/mL), mean C<sub>max</sub> (range: 10.6-26.0 µg/mL) and mean T<sub>max</sub> (range: 105-206 min) were found between the compartments. In plasma there was a tendency towards lower measures. No difference between compartments was found for tissue penetration. At the last samples obtained (450 min) the mean carboplatin concentrations were 4.9-9.9 µg/mL across the investigated solid tissues.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Equal carboplatin distribution in abdominal organ tissues, detectable concentrations for at least 6 h after HIPEC completion, and a carboplatin penetration depth of minimum four mm were found. The present study proposes a new HIPEC porcine model for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467902/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33484282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Pleura and Peritoneum
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1