首页 > 最新文献

Pragmatic and Observational Research最新文献

英文 中文
Mapping EQ-5D-5L Score From SGRQ in Patients with Asthma and/or COPD in NOVELTY. 从哮喘和/或COPD患者的SGRQ中绘制EQ-5D-5L评分
IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-06-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/POR.S508814
Dan Jackson, Anna Quinton, Fanni Zhang, Hana Müllerová, Christer Janson, Mohsen Sadatsafavi

Purpose: The St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) measures health status in obstructive airways disease. Starkie et al proposed an algorithm for mapping the SGRQ to EQ-5D-5L, a preference-based utility measure, in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (Value Health 2011;14:354-60); only SGRQ total score, its squared value, and sex were included as covariates. We aimed to determine if including additional covariates could improve the performance of this algorithm type and whether amendments were required to extend this mapping to asthma or asthma+COPD.

Patients and methods: SGRQ and EQ-5D-5L were measured from a large, global, prospective, longitudinal study in asthma and/or COPD (NOVELTY; NCT02760329). We fitted six longitudinal linear mixed models to the development sample (baseline and Year 1 data), with EQ-5D-5L as the response variable. Each model had a different combination of covariates. Mixed model repeated measures methodology was used to enable the accommodation of within-patient correlation among measurements. Restricted maximum likelihood and an unstructured covariance matrix were used to fit all models. Performance (mean square errors [MSE]) was evaluated relative to the Starkie et al algorithm in the validation sample (Year 2 and Year 3 data).

Results: A total of 6813 patients (asthma: 3546; asthma+COPD: 872; COPD: 2395) with available EQ-5D-5L and SGRQ data were included at baseline. MSEs indicated good performance, were similar across models (Year 2: 0.0302-0.0308 [45-46% variance explained]; Year 3: 0.0272-0.0277 [47-48% variance explained]), and were modestly smaller than those obtained by Starkie et al (Year 2: 0.0340; Year 3: 0.0296). Performance was similar across models in the asthma and COPD subgroups.

Conclusion: Including additional covariates and SGRQ domains resulted in similar model performance to Starkie et al, suggesting their covariates are adequate for mapping in asthma and/or COPD. NOVELTY coefficients broaden the population with chronic airways disease for whom this mapping can be applied.

目的:圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)测量阻塞性气道疾病患者的健康状况。Starkie等人提出了一种将SGRQ映射到EQ-5D-5L的算法,EQ-5D-5L是一种基于偏好的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)效用度量(Value Health 2011;14:35 54-60);协变量仅包括SGRQ总分、其平方值和性别。我们的目的是确定加入额外的协变量是否可以提高该算法类型的性能,以及是否需要修改以将该映射扩展到哮喘或哮喘+COPD。患者和方法:SGRQ和EQ-5D-5L来自一项针对哮喘和/或COPD的大型、全球、前瞻性、纵向研究(NOVELTY;NCT02760329)。我们将六个纵向线性混合模型拟合到开发样本(基线和第一年数据)中,EQ-5D-5L作为响应变量。每个模型都有不同的协变量组合。采用混合模型重复测量方法,以适应患者内部测量之间的相关性。限制最大似然和非结构化协方差矩阵用于拟合所有模型。在验证样本(第2年和第3年数据)中,相对于Starkie等算法评估性能(均方误差[MSE])。结果:共6813例患者(哮喘:3546例;哮喘+慢性阻塞性肺病:872;COPD: 2395),基线时纳入可用的EQ-5D-5L和SGRQ数据。mse表现良好,各模型相似(第二年:0.0302-0.0308[45-46%方差解释];第3年:0.0272-0.0277[47-48%方差解释]),并且略小于Starkie等人的结果(第2年:0.0340;第三年:0.0296)。在哮喘和COPD亚组中,各模型的表现相似。结论:包括额外的协变量和SGRQ域导致与Starkie等人相似的模型性能,这表明他们的协变量足以用于哮喘和/或COPD的映射。新颖性系数扩大了慢性呼吸道疾病的人群,这种映射可以应用于他们。
{"title":"Mapping EQ-5D-5L Score From SGRQ in Patients with Asthma and/or COPD in NOVELTY.","authors":"Dan Jackson, Anna Quinton, Fanni Zhang, Hana Müllerová, Christer Janson, Mohsen Sadatsafavi","doi":"10.2147/POR.S508814","DOIUrl":"10.2147/POR.S508814","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) measures health status in obstructive airways disease. Starkie et al proposed an algorithm for mapping the SGRQ to EQ-5D-5L, a preference-based utility measure, in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (Value Health 2011;14:354-60); only SGRQ total score, its squared value, and sex were included as covariates. We aimed to determine if including additional covariates could improve the performance of this algorithm type and whether amendments were required to extend this mapping to asthma or asthma+COPD.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>SGRQ and EQ-5D-5L were measured from a large, global, prospective, longitudinal study in asthma and/or COPD (NOVELTY; NCT02760329). We fitted six longitudinal linear mixed models to the development sample (baseline and Year 1 data), with EQ-5D-5L as the response variable. Each model had a different combination of covariates. Mixed model repeated measures methodology was used to enable the accommodation of within-patient correlation among measurements. Restricted maximum likelihood and an unstructured covariance matrix were used to fit all models. Performance (mean square errors [MSE]) was evaluated relative to the Starkie et al algorithm in the validation sample (Year 2 and Year 3 data).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6813 patients (asthma: 3546; asthma+COPD: 872; COPD: 2395) with available EQ-5D-5L and SGRQ data were included at baseline. MSEs indicated good performance, were similar across models (Year 2: 0.0302-0.0308 [45-46% variance explained]; Year 3: 0.0272-0.0277 [47-48% variance explained]), and were modestly smaller than those obtained by Starkie et al (Year 2: 0.0340; Year 3: 0.0296). Performance was similar across models in the asthma and COPD subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Including additional covariates and SGRQ domains resulted in similar model performance to Starkie et al, suggesting their covariates are adequate for mapping in asthma and/or COPD. NOVELTY coefficients broaden the population with chronic airways disease for whom this mapping can be applied.</p>","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":"16 ","pages":"135-145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152420/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144275800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comprehensive Description of an Automated Drug Dispensing System Database. 自动化药品调剂系统数据库的综合描述。
IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-04-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/POR.S488210
Nina L Wittwer, Christoph R Meier, Martin J Recknagel, Samuel Allemann, Cornelia Schneider

Medifilm is a company that blisters drug therapies recorded by pharmacists in the Medifilm software. The Medifilm dataset collates this information and provides details on drug substances, dosages, pharmacotherapy duration, the sequence of therapies, as well as demographic data on the patients. This article aims to provide an overview of the database, to describe the contents, and to demonstrate possibilities for researchers. The database and the recorded information were described. Furthermore, the data coverage was characterized in terms of the number of available pharmacies, patients, and their drug regimens. The database has been recording data since 2013 and has registered 470,801 blistered therapies for 45,594 patients ordered by 441 pharmacies so far. The longitudinal nature of the database allows researchers to study drug utilization, including medication changes, initiations, and discontinuations over time.

Medifilm是一家将药剂师在Medifilm软件中记录的药物治疗进行泡泡处理的公司。Medifilm数据集整理了这些信息,并提供了有关药物物质、剂量、药物治疗持续时间、治疗顺序以及患者人口统计数据的详细信息。本文旨在提供数据库的概述,描述内容,并为研究人员展示可能性。描述了数据库和记录的信息。此外,数据覆盖范围的特点是可获得的药房、患者及其药物方案的数量。该数据库自2013年以来一直在记录数据,迄今为止,已有441家药店订购的45594名患者注册了470801种起泡疗法。该数据库的纵向特性允许研究人员研究药物使用情况,包括药物变化、起始和停药。
{"title":"Comprehensive Description of an Automated Drug Dispensing System Database.","authors":"Nina L Wittwer, Christoph R Meier, Martin J Recknagel, Samuel Allemann, Cornelia Schneider","doi":"10.2147/POR.S488210","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2147/POR.S488210","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medifilm is a company that blisters drug therapies recorded by pharmacists in the Medifilm software. The Medifilm dataset collates this information and provides details on drug substances, dosages, pharmacotherapy duration, the sequence of therapies, as well as demographic data on the patients. This article aims to provide an overview of the database, to describe the contents, and to demonstrate possibilities for researchers. The database and the recorded information were described. Furthermore, the data coverage was characterized in terms of the number of available pharmacies, patients, and their drug regimens. The database has been recording data since 2013 and has registered 470,801 blistered therapies for 45,594 patients ordered by 441 pharmacies so far. The longitudinal nature of the database allows researchers to study drug utilization, including medication changes, initiations, and discontinuations over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":"16 ","pages":"129-134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11994459/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144064369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Side Effects and Reasons for Discontinuation: A Patient Survey (RELICS-PS). 类固醇矿物皮质激素受体拮抗剂副作用和停药原因:患者调查(RELICS-PS)。
IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-04-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/POR.S489802
Emma L Richard, Judith J Stephenson, Nihar R Desai, Vincent J Willey, Alain Gay, Charlie Scott, Kerstin Folkerts, Elena Pessina, Rakesh Singh, Chia-Chen Teng, Nikolaus G Oberprieler

Purpose: To understand steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (sMRAs) treatment patterns and side effects from patients' perspectives.

Methods: The RELICS-PS study, a complement to the claims-based RELICS study, used a cross-sectional patient survey targeting adults with commercial or Medicare Advantage health insurance who had at least one pharmacy claim for sMRAs (spironolactone or eplerenone) between July 2021 and June 2022. It used the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD®) as the sampling frame to identify eligible patients. A total of 600 completed surveys were targeted from current and past sMRA users between November and December 2022. The survey collected data on demographics, chronic conditions, prespecified side effects, and reasons for discontinuation among past sMRA users, describing the data without inferential testing.

Results: Of 600 respondents, 49.2% reported at least one side effect. Side effects varied from 5.5% (weak pulse and chest pains) to 40.0% (sluggishness or fatigue). Reports of symptoms of male gynecomastia were noticeably higher than in medical claims in RELICS (17.4% vs 2.9%). Past users, consisting of 24.3% of respondents, were more likely to report experiencing side effects, experiencing them more frequently, and being more affected by them. Approximately a third of these respondents reported side effects as a deciding factor for discontinuation. Healthcare providers' recommendations, often informed by medication effectiveness and patient tolerance, were the most cited reason for discontinuation.

Conclusion: Although half of the respondents reported experiencing side effects, 39.0% of past users identified side effects as a reason for discontinuation. This suggests a gap between patient experience and perceived reasons for discontinuation. A notable finding from the study is the significant role of healthcare providers in influencing the decisions to start or stop sMRA treatment. Therefore, future research should focus on exploring the factors that shape healthcare providers' decision-making processes when initiating and discontinuing treatment options.

目的:从患者的角度了解甾体矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂(sMRAs)的治疗模式和副作用。方法:RELICS- ps研究是基于索赔的relic研究的补充,采用了一项横断患者调查,目标是在2021年7月至2022年6月期间至少有一项smra(螺内酯或依普瑞酮)药房索赔的商业或Medicare Advantage健康保险成年人。它使用医疗保健综合研究数据库(HIRD®)作为抽样框架来确定符合条件的患者。在2022年11月至12月期间,共有600份已完成的调查针对当前和过去的sMRA用户。该调查收集了过去sMRA使用者的人口统计数据、慢性疾病、预先规定的副作用和停药原因,描述了没有推论检验的数据。结果:在600名受访者中,49.2%的人报告了至少一种副作用。副作用从5.5%(脉搏微弱和胸痛)到40.0%(行动迟缓或疲劳)不等。在relic中,男性男性乳房发育症的症状报告明显高于医疗索赔(17.4% vs 2.9%)。过去的使用者,占受访者的24.3%,更有可能报告经历副作用,更频繁地经历副作用,并且受到副作用的影响更大。大约三分之一的受访者表示,副作用是决定是否停用的因素。医疗保健提供者的建议,通常是根据药物有效性和患者耐受性,是最常见的停药原因。结论:虽然一半的受访者报告有副作用,但39.0%的过去使用者认为副作用是停药的原因。这表明患者的经验和感知到的停药原因之间存在差距。该研究的一个显著发现是,医疗服务提供者在决定开始或停止sMRA治疗方面发挥了重要作用。因此,未来的研究应侧重于探索在开始和停止治疗方案时影响医疗保健提供者决策过程的因素。
{"title":"Steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Side Effects and Reasons for Discontinuation: A Patient Survey (RELICS-PS).","authors":"Emma L Richard, Judith J Stephenson, Nihar R Desai, Vincent J Willey, Alain Gay, Charlie Scott, Kerstin Folkerts, Elena Pessina, Rakesh Singh, Chia-Chen Teng, Nikolaus G Oberprieler","doi":"10.2147/POR.S489802","DOIUrl":"10.2147/POR.S489802","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To understand steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (sMRAs) treatment patterns and side effects from patients' perspectives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The RELICS-PS study, a complement to the claims-based RELICS study, used a cross-sectional patient survey targeting adults with commercial or Medicare Advantage health insurance who had at least one pharmacy claim for sMRAs (spironolactone or eplerenone) between July 2021 and June 2022. It used the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD<sup>®</sup>) as the sampling frame to identify eligible patients. A total of 600 completed surveys were targeted from current and past sMRA users between November and December 2022. The survey collected data on demographics, chronic conditions, prespecified side effects, and reasons for discontinuation among past sMRA users, describing the data without inferential testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 600 respondents, 49.2% reported at least one side effect. Side effects varied from 5.5% (weak pulse and chest pains) to 40.0% (sluggishness or fatigue). Reports of symptoms of male gynecomastia were noticeably higher than in medical claims in RELICS (17.4% vs 2.9%). Past users, consisting of 24.3% of respondents, were more likely to report experiencing side effects, experiencing them more frequently, and being more affected by them. Approximately a third of these respondents reported side effects as a deciding factor for discontinuation. Healthcare providers' recommendations, often informed by medication effectiveness and patient tolerance, were the most cited reason for discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although half of the respondents reported experiencing side effects, 39.0% of past users identified side effects as a reason for discontinuation. This suggests a gap between patient experience and perceived reasons for discontinuation. A notable finding from the study is the significant role of healthcare providers in influencing the decisions to start or stop sMRA treatment. Therefore, future research should focus on exploring the factors that shape healthcare providers' decision-making processes when initiating and discontinuing treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":"16 ","pages":"121-127"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974567/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143804099","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Shifting from Traditional to Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trials: Insights and Lessons Learned from the Toddler Oral Health Intervention. 从传统到实用的随机对照试验:幼儿口腔健康干预的见解和经验教训。
IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-03-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/POR.S493195
Brenda G Grift, Peggy C J M van Spreuwel, Josef J J M Bruers, Katarina Jerković-Ćosić

Purpose: This article examines the implementation of the Toddler Oral Health Intervention (TOHI) protocol, emphasizing feasibility, recruitment, retention, and protocol adherence rather than clinical outcomes. It discusses encountered challenges, necessary adjustments, and key lessons learned during the shift from a traditional randomized controlled trial (RCT) to a pragmatic RCT, thereby offering guidance for future research on similar complex interventions.

Methods: The methods of the RCT study protocol are presented, including (1) recruitment of well-baby clinics and oral health coaches, (2) recruitment of the study population; (3) implementation of the intervention and (4) outcome measures, alongside with the process of implementation and gathered feedback needed for required adjustments. A systematic analysis identified key protocol elements, modifications made, and lessons learned.

Results: Specific protocol modifications, including adjustments due to the COVID-19 pandemic, demonstrate how a traditional RCT can be adapted to real-world conditions without compromising outcome reliability. Key lessons include the necessity of robust contingency planning to manage unforeseen disruptions, effective recruitment and retention strategies to sustain participant and interventionists engagement, and the adoption of standardized data collection processes to ensure data integrity. These findings underscore the importance of addressing practical and contextual factors alongside measuring effectiveness, ensuring that study outcomes are both applicable and useful in clinical practice.

Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that carefully planned and documented pragmatic adjustments not only preserve scientific rigor but also enhance the relevance and applicability of the results, maintaining the methodological robustness expected of traditional RCTs.

目的:本文考察了幼儿口腔健康干预(TOHI)方案的实施,强调可行性、招募、保留和方案依从性,而不是临床结果。它讨论了从传统随机对照试验(RCT)到实用RCT转变过程中遇到的挑战、必要的调整以及吸取的关键教训,从而为未来类似复杂干预措施的研究提供指导。方法:介绍了RCT研究方案的方法,包括:(1)招募健康婴儿诊所和口腔健康教练;(2)招募研究人群;(3)干预措施的实施和(4)结果措施,以及实施过程和收集所需的调整反馈。系统分析确定了关键的协议要素、所做的修改和吸取的教训。结果:具体的方案修改,包括因COVID-19大流行而进行的调整,证明了传统的随机对照试验如何在不影响结果可靠性的情况下适应现实情况。重要的经验教训包括:必须制定强有力的应急计划,以管理不可预见的中断;有效的招聘和保留战略,以维持参与者和干预者的参与;采用标准化的数据收集流程,以确保数据完整性。这些发现强调了在测量有效性的同时解决实际和背景因素的重要性,确保研究结果在临床实践中既适用又有用。结论:研究结果表明,精心规划和记录的务实调整不仅保持了科学严谨性,而且增强了结果的相关性和适用性,保持了传统随机对照试验所期望的方法学稳健性。
{"title":"Shifting from Traditional to Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trials: Insights and Lessons Learned from the Toddler Oral Health Intervention.","authors":"Brenda G Grift, Peggy C J M van Spreuwel, Josef J J M Bruers, Katarina Jerković-Ćosić","doi":"10.2147/POR.S493195","DOIUrl":"10.2147/POR.S493195","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This article examines the implementation of the Toddler Oral Health Intervention (TOHI) protocol, emphasizing feasibility, recruitment, retention, and protocol adherence rather than clinical outcomes. It discusses encountered challenges, necessary adjustments, and key lessons learned during the shift from a traditional randomized controlled trial (RCT) to a pragmatic RCT, thereby offering guidance for future research on similar complex interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The methods of the RCT study protocol are presented, including (1) recruitment of well-baby clinics and oral health coaches, (2) recruitment of the study population; (3) implementation of the intervention and (4) outcome measures, alongside with the process of implementation and gathered feedback needed for required adjustments. A systematic analysis identified key protocol elements, modifications made, and lessons learned.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Specific protocol modifications, including adjustments due to the COVID-19 pandemic, demonstrate how a traditional RCT can be adapted to real-world conditions without compromising outcome reliability. Key lessons include the necessity of robust contingency planning to manage unforeseen disruptions, effective recruitment and retention strategies to sustain participant and interventionists engagement, and the adoption of standardized data collection processes to ensure data integrity. These findings underscore the importance of addressing practical and contextual factors alongside measuring effectiveness, ensuring that study outcomes are both applicable and useful in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings demonstrate that carefully planned and documented pragmatic adjustments not only preserve scientific rigor but also enhance the relevance and applicability of the results, maintaining the methodological robustness expected of traditional RCTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":"16 ","pages":"111-120"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963812/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143773133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predicting Risk of Morbidities Associated with Oral Corticosteroid Prescription for Asthma. 预测与口服皮质类固醇处方治疗哮喘相关的发病风险。
IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-03-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/POR.S484146
Brooklyn Stanley, Jatin Chapaneri, Mina Khezrian, Ekaterina Maslova, Soram Patel, Mark Gurnell, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Helen K Reddel, Liam G Heaney, Arnaud Bourdin, David L Neil, Victoria Carter, David B Price

Background: Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are commonly used to treat asthma but increase the risks for multiple morbidities; reducing OCS exposure may benefit patients. We analysed independent risk factors and longitudinal changes in OCS usage among patients with asthma to predict future risks of OCS-related adverse outcomes.

Methods: Optimum Patient Care Research Database United Kingdom primary care electronic medical records (EMR) from January 1990 to June 2021 were used to select adults (18-93 years) with asthma who had follow-up data from ≥2 years before to ≥3 years after an index visit for active symptoms; this date was defined by the largest pre-visit to post-visit change in mean annual OCS use. OCS usage during every follow-up year was categorised as none, low (mean <2 prescriptions/year), or high (mean ≥2 prescriptions/year). Pre-index to post-index changes between usage categories were calculated. Risk modelling selected cohorts without 17 morbidities (documented pre-index) reported to be associated with OCS exposure, including type 2 diabetes, osteoporosis, hypertension, and pneumonia. Cox regression analyses selected published risk factors associated with each condition and available in EMR for inclusion in proportional hazards models.

Results: The pre-index to post-index OCS usage category remained unchanged in 38.6% of patients, increased in 39.2%, and decreased in 22.2%, with 20.7% having no further OCS prescriptions. In models, the risks of all adverse outcomes increased with projected categoric OCS use; for example, hazard ratios for a one-category increment (none to low, low to high) were 1.55 (1.42-1.69) for type 2 diabetes, 1.56 (1.36-1.78) for post-menopausal osteoporosis, 1.05 (1.00-1.10) for hypertension, and 1.67 (1.52-1.83) for pneumonia (all p < 0.001).

Conclusion: OCS exposure in this primary care asthma population usually continued longitudinally. Our models predict increased risk of multiple morbidities with higher projected OCS exposure. These findings support early initiation of strategies to minimise OCS use in asthma.

背景:口服皮质类固醇(OCS)通常用于治疗哮喘,但会增加多种疾病的风险;减少OCS暴露可能对患者有益。我们分析了哮喘患者使用OCS的独立危险因素和纵向变化,以预测OCS相关不良结局的未来风险。方法:使用1990年1月至2021年6月英国初级保健电子医疗记录(EMR),选择成人(18-93岁)哮喘患者,随访数据为活动性症状指数就诊前≥2年至随访后≥3年;这个日期被定义为访问前和访问后平均OCS年使用量的最大变化。结果:38.6%的患者指数前和指数后OCS使用类别保持不变,39.2%的患者增加,22.2%的患者减少,20.7%的患者没有进一步的OCS处方。在模型中,所有不良后果的风险随着OCS分类使用的预测而增加;例如,一类增量(从零到低,从低到高)的风险比为:2型糖尿病1.55(1.42-1.69),绝经后骨质疏松1.56(1.36-1.78),高血压1.05(1.00-1.10),肺炎1.67(1.52-1.83)(均p < 0.001)。结论:OCS暴露在初级保健哮喘人群中通常是纵向持续的。我们的模型预测,随着预计OCS暴露量的增加,多种疾病的风险也会增加。这些发现支持早期启动策略,以尽量减少OCS在哮喘中的使用。
{"title":"Predicting Risk of Morbidities Associated with Oral Corticosteroid Prescription for Asthma.","authors":"Brooklyn Stanley, Jatin Chapaneri, Mina Khezrian, Ekaterina Maslova, Soram Patel, Mark Gurnell, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Helen K Reddel, Liam G Heaney, Arnaud Bourdin, David L Neil, Victoria Carter, David B Price","doi":"10.2147/POR.S484146","DOIUrl":"10.2147/POR.S484146","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are commonly used to treat asthma but increase the risks for multiple morbidities; reducing OCS exposure may benefit patients. We analysed independent risk factors and longitudinal changes in OCS usage among patients with asthma to predict future risks of OCS-related adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Optimum Patient Care Research Database United Kingdom primary care electronic medical records (EMR) from January 1990 to June 2021 were used to select adults (18-93 years) with asthma who had follow-up data from ≥2 years before to ≥3 years after an index visit for active symptoms; this date was defined by the largest pre-visit to post-visit change in mean annual OCS use. OCS usage during every follow-up year was categorised as none, low (mean <2 prescriptions/year), or high (mean ≥2 prescriptions/year). Pre-index to post-index changes between usage categories were calculated. Risk modelling selected cohorts without 17 morbidities (documented pre-index) reported to be associated with OCS exposure, including type 2 diabetes, osteoporosis, hypertension, and pneumonia. Cox regression analyses selected published risk factors associated with each condition and available in EMR for inclusion in proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pre-index to post-index OCS usage category remained unchanged in 38.6% of patients, increased in 39.2%, and decreased in 22.2%, with 20.7% having no further OCS prescriptions. In models, the risks of all adverse outcomes increased with projected categoric OCS use; for example, hazard ratios for a one-category increment (none to low, low to high) were 1.55 (1.42-1.69) for type 2 diabetes, 1.56 (1.36-1.78) for post-menopausal osteoporosis, 1.05 (1.00-1.10) for hypertension, and 1.67 (1.52-1.83) for pneumonia (all p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OCS exposure in this primary care asthma population usually continued longitudinally. Our models predict increased risk of multiple morbidities with higher projected OCS exposure. These findings support early initiation of strategies to minimise OCS use in asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":"16 ","pages":"95-109"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954399/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143754303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Better Understanding Rehabilitation of Motor Symptoms: Insights from the Use of Wearables. 更好地理解运动症状的康复:来自可穿戴设备使用的见解。
IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-03-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/POR.S396198
Yunus Celik, Conor Wall, Jason Moore, Alan Godfrey

Movement disorders present a substantial challenge by adversely affecting daily routines and overall well-being through a diverse spectrum of motor symptoms. Traditionally, motor symptoms have been evaluated through manual observational methods and patient-reported outcomes. While those approaches are valuable, they are limited by their subjectivity. In contrast, wearable technologies (wearables) provide objective assessments while actively supporting rehabilitation through continuous tracking, real-time feedback, and personalized physical therapy-based interventions. The aim of this literature review is to examine current research on the use of wearables in the rehabilitation of motor symptoms, focusing on their features, applications, and impact on improving motor function. By exploring research protocols, metrics, and study findings, this review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of how wearables are being used to support and optimize rehabilitation outcomes. To achieve that aim, a systematic search of the literature was conducted. Findings reveal that gait disturbance and postural balance are the primary motor symptoms extensively studied with tremor and freezing of gait (FoG) also receiving attention. Wearable sensing ranges from bespoke inertial and/or electromyography to commercial units such as personal devices (ie, smartwatch). Interactive (virtual reality, VR and augmented reality, AR) and immersive technologies (headphones), along with wearable robotic systems (exoskeletons), have proven to be effective in improving motor skills. Auditory cueing (via smartwatches or headphones), aids gait training with rhythmic feedback, while visual cues (via VR and AR glasses) enhance balance exercises through real-time feedback. The development of treatment protocols that incorporate personalized cues via wearables could enhance adherence and engagement to potentially lead to long-term improvements. However, evidence on the sustained effectiveness of wearable-based interventions remains limited.

运动障碍通过各种各样的运动症状对日常生活和整体健康产生不利影响,这是一项重大挑战。传统上,运动症状是通过人工观察方法和患者报告的结果来评估的。虽然这些方法很有价值,但它们受到主观性的限制。相比之下,可穿戴技术(可穿戴设备)在提供客观评估的同时,通过持续跟踪、实时反馈和基于个性化物理治疗的干预措施积极支持康复。本文献综述的目的是检查可穿戴设备在运动症状康复中的应用的当前研究,重点关注它们的特点、应用和对改善运动功能的影响。通过探索研究方案、指标和研究结果,本综述旨在全面概述可穿戴设备如何用于支持和优化康复结果。为了达到这个目的,对文献进行了系统的检索。结果表明,步态障碍和姿势平衡是主要的运动症状,震颤和步态冻结(FoG)也得到了广泛的研究。可穿戴传感器的范围从定制的惯性和/或肌电图到商业设备,如个人设备(即智能手表)。交互式(虚拟现实,VR和增强现实,AR)和沉浸式技术(耳机)以及可穿戴机器人系统(外骨骼)已被证明在提高运动技能方面是有效的。听觉线索(通过智能手表或耳机)通过节奏反馈帮助步态训练,而视觉线索(通过VR和AR眼镜)通过实时反馈增强平衡练习。通过可穿戴设备结合个性化提示的治疗方案的发展可以提高依从性和参与度,从而可能导致长期改善。然而,关于基于可穿戴设备的干预措施的持续有效性的证据仍然有限。
{"title":"Better Understanding Rehabilitation of Motor Symptoms: Insights from the Use of Wearables.","authors":"Yunus Celik, Conor Wall, Jason Moore, Alan Godfrey","doi":"10.2147/POR.S396198","DOIUrl":"10.2147/POR.S396198","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Movement disorders present a substantial challenge by adversely affecting daily routines and overall well-being through a diverse spectrum of motor symptoms. Traditionally, motor symptoms have been evaluated through manual observational methods and patient-reported outcomes. While those approaches are valuable, they are limited by their subjectivity. In contrast, wearable technologies (wearables) provide objective assessments while actively supporting rehabilitation through continuous tracking, real-time feedback, and personalized physical therapy-based interventions. The aim of this literature review is to examine current research on the use of wearables in the rehabilitation of motor symptoms, focusing on their features, applications, and impact on improving motor function. By exploring research protocols, metrics, and study findings, this review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of how wearables are being used to support and optimize rehabilitation outcomes. To achieve that aim, a systematic search of the literature was conducted. Findings reveal that gait disturbance and postural balance are the primary motor symptoms extensively studied with tremor and freezing of gait (FoG) also receiving attention. Wearable sensing ranges from bespoke inertial and/or electromyography to commercial units such as personal devices (ie, smartwatch). Interactive (virtual reality, VR and augmented reality, AR) and immersive technologies (headphones), along with wearable robotic systems (exoskeletons), have proven to be effective in improving motor skills. Auditory cueing (via smartwatches or headphones), aids gait training with rhythmic feedback, while visual cues (via VR and AR glasses) enhance balance exercises through real-time feedback. The development of treatment protocols that incorporate personalized cues via wearables could enhance adherence and engagement to potentially lead to long-term improvements. However, evidence on the sustained effectiveness of wearable-based interventions remains limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":"16 ","pages":"67-93"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11930022/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143692998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real-World Biologic Use Patterns in Severe Asthma, 2015-2021: The CLEAR Study. 2015-2021年严重哮喘的真实世界生物使用模式:CLEAR研究。
IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-03-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/POR.S497033
Trung N Tran, Stephanie Chen, Benjamin Emmanuel, Alan Altraja, Arnaud Bourdin, Chau-Chyun Sheu, Ming-Ju Tsai, Flavia C L Hoyte, Anna Quinton, Bill Cook, Lakmini Bulathsinhala, William Henley, Celine Yun Yi Goh, Yang Liu, Cono Ariti, Victoria Carter, David B Price

Background: Biologics targeting immunoglobulin E, interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13 or IL-5 signaling are effective at treating severe asthma; however, individual patients' responses may be suboptimal, leading to therapy switching or stopping. The CLEAR study aimed to assess real-world biologic use patterns and associated clinical outcomes in patients receiving care for severe asthma.

Methods: CLEAR was a multicenter, observational study that included adults (≥18 years old) from 23 countries enrolled in the International Severe Asthma Registry between December 2015 and August 2021. Patients who initiated biologic therapy were categorized as continuing the initial biologic for 6 months, switching to another biologic within 6 months or stopping biologic treatment within 6 months. Outcomes were assessed using the closest available data to 12 months after biologic initiation, using propensity score-weighted multivariable regression models.

Results: Among 1,859 patients who initiated biologic therapy, 1,116 (60.0%) continued, 474 (25.5%) switched and 269 (14.5%) stopped treatment. Patients who switched or stopped therapy had a higher annualized asthma exacerbation rate post-initiation than those who continued (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] [95% confidence interval]: switched, 1.83 [1.51, 2.22]; stopped, 1.53 [1.19, 1.95]) and were more likely to have uncontrolled asthma at last assessment (adjusted odds ratio: switched, 5.40 [3.12, 9.33]; stopped, 4.02 [2.32, 6.98]). Compared with those who continued therapy, patients who switched had a higher long-term daily oral corticosteroid dose (adjusted β: 3.77 [1.71, 4.37] mg) and higher rates of hospitalizations (aIRR: 2.58 [1.52, 4.37]) and emergency room visits (aIRR: 2.12 [1.39, 3.24]).

Conclusion: Switching or stopping biologic therapy was associated with worse clinical outcomes than continuing the initial therapy.

背景:靶向免疫球蛋白E、白细胞介素(IL)-4/IL-13或IL-5信号传导的生物制剂可有效治疗重度哮喘;然而,个别患者的反应可能是次优的,导致治疗切换或停止。CLEAR研究旨在评估现实世界中接受治疗的严重哮喘患者的生物制剂使用模式和相关临床结果。CLEAR是一项多中心观察性研究,纳入了来自23个国家的成人(≥18岁),于2015年12月至2021年8月在国际严重哮喘登记处登记。开始生物治疗的患者被分类为继续使用最初的生物治疗6个月,在6个月内换用另一种生物治疗,或在6个月内停止生物治疗。使用倾向评分加权多变量回归模型,使用生物起始后12个月最接近的可用数据评估结果。结果:在1859例开始生物治疗的患者中,1116例(60.0%)继续治疗,474例(25.5%)切换治疗,269例(14.5%)停止治疗。切换或停止治疗的患者在开始治疗后的年化哮喘加重率高于继续治疗的患者(调整发病率比[aIRR][95%置信区间]:切换,1.83 [1.51,2.22];停止,1.53[1.19,1.95]),并且在最后评估时更有可能发生未控制的哮喘(调整后的优势比:切换,5.40 [3.12,9.33];停,[2.32,6.98])。与继续治疗的患者相比,转换治疗的患者长期每日口服皮质类固醇剂量更高(调整后的β: 3.77 [1.71, 4.37] mg),住院率(aIRR: 2.58[1.52, 4.37])和急诊室就诊率(aIRR: 2.12[1.39, 3.24])。结论:切换或停止生物治疗比继续初始治疗的临床结果更差。
{"title":"Real-World Biologic Use Patterns in Severe Asthma, 2015-2021: The CLEAR Study.","authors":"Trung N Tran, Stephanie Chen, Benjamin Emmanuel, Alan Altraja, Arnaud Bourdin, Chau-Chyun Sheu, Ming-Ju Tsai, Flavia C L Hoyte, Anna Quinton, Bill Cook, Lakmini Bulathsinhala, William Henley, Celine Yun Yi Goh, Yang Liu, Cono Ariti, Victoria Carter, David B Price","doi":"10.2147/POR.S497033","DOIUrl":"10.2147/POR.S497033","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biologics targeting immunoglobulin E, interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13 or IL-5 signaling are effective at treating severe asthma; however, individual patients' responses may be suboptimal, leading to therapy switching or stopping. The CLEAR study aimed to assess real-world biologic use patterns and associated clinical outcomes in patients receiving care for severe asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CLEAR was a multicenter, observational study that included adults (≥18 years old) from 23 countries enrolled in the International Severe Asthma Registry between December 2015 and August 2021. Patients who initiated biologic therapy were categorized as continuing the initial biologic for 6 months, switching to another biologic within 6 months or stopping biologic treatment within 6 months. Outcomes were assessed using the closest available data to 12 months after biologic initiation, using propensity score-weighted multivariable regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1,859 patients who initiated biologic therapy, 1,116 (60.0%) continued, 474 (25.5%) switched and 269 (14.5%) stopped treatment. Patients who switched or stopped therapy had a higher annualized asthma exacerbation rate post-initiation than those who continued (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] [95% confidence interval]: switched, 1.83 [1.51, 2.22]; stopped, 1.53 [1.19, 1.95]) and were more likely to have uncontrolled asthma at last assessment (adjusted odds ratio: switched, 5.40 [3.12, 9.33]; stopped, 4.02 [2.32, 6.98]). Compared with those who continued therapy, patients who switched had a higher long-term daily oral corticosteroid dose (adjusted β: 3.77 [1.71, 4.37] mg) and higher rates of hospitalizations (aIRR: 2.58 [1.52, 4.37]) and emergency room visits (aIRR: 2.12 [1.39, 3.24]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Switching or stopping biologic therapy was associated with worse clinical outcomes than continuing the initial therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":"16 ","pages":"51-66"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11929530/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143693027","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Prospective Observational Study to Evaluate the Actual Use of 1% Pimecrolimus in Chinese Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Atopic Dermatitis Affecting Sensitive Skin Areas. 一项评估1%吡美莫司在中国轻度至中度影响敏感皮肤区域的特应性皮炎患者实际使用情况的前瞻性观察研究。
IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-03-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/POR.S496970
Zhiqiang Xie, Jianmin Chang, Lin Ma, Chunping Shen, Li Zhang, Qian An, Hua Wang, Xia Dou, Yue Zheng, Congxiu Ye, Ying Gao

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disorder that affects both children and adults, characterized by pruritus and scaly, dry eczematous lesions. This study aimed to gather knowledge on the actual use and effectiveness of Pimecrolimus (PIM) in Chinese patients with mild-to-moderate AD affecting sensitive skin areas in routine clinical practice.

Methods: This multicentre and non-interventional study included 130 subjects from China, divided into two age groups (2-12 years and ≥12 years). The primary endpoint was the change in SCORAD index, in AD areas from inclusion to the end of the PIM treatment period.

Results: The primary efficacy analysis showed a significant reduction in the SCORAD index from baseline to the end of the PIM treatment period (p < 0.0001). The mean change in SCORAD index (SD) from baseline at visit 2 and visit 3 was -15.4 (10.50) and -18.6 (11.57), respectively. The mean Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score decreased from 2.3 at baseline to 0.7 at the end of the study, while the mean itching score decreased from 4.7 at baseline to 0.9 at the end of the study. The mean duration of PIM use was 38.3 days, with similar durations for patients above and below 12 years. There was progressive improvement in the quality of life of the patients with PIM treatment. The median time to first flare was 100 days and no adverse drug reactions or significant adverse events were reported during the study.

Discussion: This study provides robust real-world evidence that PIM 1% cream is effective for the treatment of mild-to-moderate AD in Chinese patients, particularly in sensitive skin areas and paediatric population. PIM also offers a TCS-sparing approach, making it a valuable option for managing mild-to-moderate AD.

特应性皮炎(AD)是一种常见的炎症性皮肤病,影响儿童和成人,其特征是瘙痒和鳞状干性湿疹病变。本研究旨在了解吡美莫司(PIM)在中国轻度至中度影响敏感皮肤的AD患者的临床应用及疗效。方法:该多中心非干预性研究纳入130名来自中国的受试者,分为2-12岁和≥12岁两个年龄组。主要终点是从纳入到PIM治疗期结束时AD区域的SCORAD指数的变化。结果:初步疗效分析显示,从基线到PIM治疗期结束时,SCORAD指数显著降低(p < 0.0001)。与基线相比,第2次和第3次就诊时SCORAD指数(SD)的平均变化分别为-15.4(10.50)和-18.6(11.57)。研究者整体评估(IGA)的平均评分从基线时的2.3下降到研究结束时的0.7,而瘙痒的平均评分从基线时的4.7下降到研究结束时的0.9。PIM的平均使用时间为38.3天,12岁以上和12岁以下患者的使用时间相似。接受PIM治疗的患者生活质量有进行性改善。到第一次发作的中位时间为100天,研究期间未报告药物不良反应或重大不良事件。讨论:本研究提供了强有力的现实证据,证明1% PIM乳膏对中国患者的轻中度AD有效,特别是敏感皮肤区域和儿科人群。PIM还提供了一种节省tcs的方法,使其成为管理轻度至中度AD的有价值的选择。
{"title":"A Prospective Observational Study to Evaluate the Actual Use of 1% Pimecrolimus in Chinese Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Atopic Dermatitis Affecting Sensitive Skin Areas.","authors":"Zhiqiang Xie, Jianmin Chang, Lin Ma, Chunping Shen, Li Zhang, Qian An, Hua Wang, Xia Dou, Yue Zheng, Congxiu Ye, Ying Gao","doi":"10.2147/POR.S496970","DOIUrl":"10.2147/POR.S496970","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disorder that affects both children and adults, characterized by pruritus and scaly, dry eczematous lesions. This study aimed to gather knowledge on the actual use and effectiveness of Pimecrolimus (PIM) in Chinese patients with mild-to-moderate AD affecting sensitive skin areas in routine clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre and non-interventional study included 130 subjects from China, divided into two age groups (2-12 years and ≥12 years). The primary endpoint was the change in SCORAD index, in AD areas from inclusion to the end of the PIM treatment period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary efficacy analysis showed a significant reduction in the SCORAD index from baseline to the end of the PIM treatment period (p < 0.0001). The mean change in SCORAD index (SD) from baseline at visit 2 and visit 3 was -15.4 (10.50) and -18.6 (11.57), respectively. The mean Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score decreased from 2.3 at baseline to 0.7 at the end of the study, while the mean itching score decreased from 4.7 at baseline to 0.9 at the end of the study. The mean duration of PIM use was 38.3 days, with similar durations for patients above and below 12 years. There was progressive improvement in the quality of life of the patients with PIM treatment. The median time to first flare was 100 days and no adverse drug reactions or significant adverse events were reported during the study.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study provides robust real-world evidence that PIM 1% cream is effective for the treatment of mild-to-moderate AD in Chinese patients, particularly in sensitive skin areas and paediatric population. PIM also offers a TCS-sparing approach, making it a valuable option for managing mild-to-moderate AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":"16 ","pages":"39-49"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11895690/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143606252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Treatment Patterns, Adverse Events, and Clinical Outcomes with Steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists: A Retrospective Analysis of Administrative Claims Data (RELICS). 甾体矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂的治疗模式、不良事件和临床结果:行政索赔数据(relic)的回顾性分析。
IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-02-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/POR.S489791
Emma L Richard, Nihar R Desai, Vincent J Willey, Alain Gay, Charlie Scott, Kerstin Folkerts, Elena Pessina, Rakesh Singh, Chia-Chen Teng, Nikolaus G Oberprieler

Purpose: This study aimed to describe the characteristics, treatment patterns, adverse events (AEs), and clinical outcomes of patients starting steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (sMRAs) in real-world settings.

Methods: The RELICS study, complementing the survey-based RELICS-PS study, was a retrospective cohort study conducted using the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD®), a single-payer healthcare database with medical and pharmacy claims from health insurance plans across the United States. A cohort of adults initiating sMRAs from January 2016 to June 2021 was divided into six subgroups: three mutually exclusive heart failure (HF) subgroups, two mutually exclusive chronic kidney disease (CKD) subgroups, and "all other patients" subgroup, which included those without documented HF or CKD. Outcomes assessed from the first sMRA fill until death, health-plan disenrollment, or June 2022 (whichever came first) included analysis of treatment patterns, AEs, and clinical outcomes. Factors associated with sMRA discontinuation were evaluated with multivariate logistic regression.

Results: Of the 224,100 sMRA initiators identified, 76.4% did not have documented HF or CKD (ie, "all other patients" subgroup). This subgroup was younger and primarily female. Across all initiators, 72.3% were nonadherent, and 73.0% discontinued treatment within a median of 90 days of initiation. Of these discontinuers, 44.2% restarted treatment within a median of 91 days of discontinuation. Factors decreasing odds of discontinuation across most subgroups included a higher comorbidity burden, use of other cardiovascular medications, and cardiologist prescribing. These findings were consistent across subgroups. AEs and clinical outcomes varied across subgroups in line with baseline comorbidity profiles. Patients with a higher comorbidity burden, such as those with both CKD and T2D rather than CKD alone, experienced worse outcomes.

Conclusion: High rates of treatment discontinuation and subsequent restart were observed across all subgroups, implying fluctuating sMRA use. However, heightened cardiovascular risk may decrease the odds of discontinuation.

目的:本研究旨在描述现实世界中开始使用类固醇矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂(sMRAs)的患者的特征、治疗模式、不良事件(AEs)和临床结果:RELICS研究是一项回顾性队列研究,与基于调查的RELICS-PS研究互为补充,使用医疗保健综合研究数据库(HIRD®)进行。研究人员将 2016 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月期间开始接受 sMRA 治疗的成人队列分为六个亚组:三个相互排斥的心力衰竭 (HF) 亚组、两个相互排斥的慢性肾病 (CKD) 亚组以及 "所有其他患者 "亚组(包括没有记录的 HF 或 CKD 患者)。从首次服用 sMRA 到死亡、健康计划退出或 2022 年 6 月(以先到者为准)期间的结果评估包括治疗模式、AEs 和临床结果分析。通过多变量逻辑回归评估了与停用 sMRA 相关的因素:在已确认的 22.41 万名 sMRA 患者中,76.4% 没有记录在案的 HF 或 CKD(即 "所有其他患者 "亚组)。该亚组更年轻,以女性为主。在所有开始治疗的患者中,72.3%的患者没有坚持治疗,73.0%的患者在开始治疗后的中位 90 天内中断了治疗。在这些中断治疗者中,44.2% 在中断治疗后的 91 天内重新开始治疗。在大多数亚组中,降低停药几率的因素包括较高的合并症负担、使用其他心血管药物和心脏病专家处方。这些结果在不同亚组中是一致的。不同亚组的不良反应和临床结果随基线合并症情况而变化。合并症负担较重的患者,如同时患有慢性肾脏病和T2D而非仅患有慢性肾脏病的患者,预后较差:在所有亚组中都观察到了较高的治疗中断率和随后的重新开始率,这意味着 sMRA 的使用存在波动。然而,心血管风险的增加可能会降低中断治疗的几率。
{"title":"Treatment Patterns, Adverse Events, and Clinical Outcomes with Steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists: A Retrospective Analysis of Administrative Claims Data (RELICS).","authors":"Emma L Richard, Nihar R Desai, Vincent J Willey, Alain Gay, Charlie Scott, Kerstin Folkerts, Elena Pessina, Rakesh Singh, Chia-Chen Teng, Nikolaus G Oberprieler","doi":"10.2147/POR.S489791","DOIUrl":"10.2147/POR.S489791","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to describe the characteristics, treatment patterns, adverse events (AEs), and clinical outcomes of patients starting steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (sMRAs) in real-world settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The RELICS study, complementing the survey-based RELICS-PS study, was a retrospective cohort study conducted using the Healthcare Integrated Research Database (HIRD<sup>®</sup>), a single-payer healthcare database with medical and pharmacy claims from health insurance plans across the United States. A cohort of adults initiating sMRAs from January 2016 to June 2021 was divided into six subgroups: three mutually exclusive heart failure (HF) subgroups, two mutually exclusive chronic kidney disease (CKD) subgroups, and \"all other patients\" subgroup, which included those without documented HF or CKD. Outcomes assessed from the first sMRA fill until death, health-plan disenrollment, or June 2022 (whichever came first) included analysis of treatment patterns, AEs, and clinical outcomes. Factors associated with sMRA discontinuation were evaluated with multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 224,100 sMRA initiators identified, 76.4% did not have documented HF or CKD (ie, \"all other patients\" subgroup). This subgroup was younger and primarily female. Across all initiators, 72.3% were nonadherent, and 73.0% discontinued treatment within a median of 90 days of initiation. Of these discontinuers, 44.2% restarted treatment within a median of 91 days of discontinuation. Factors decreasing odds of discontinuation across most subgroups included a higher comorbidity burden, use of other cardiovascular medications, and cardiologist prescribing. These findings were consistent across subgroups. AEs and clinical outcomes varied across subgroups in line with baseline comorbidity profiles. Patients with a higher comorbidity burden, such as those with both CKD and T2D rather than CKD alone, experienced worse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High rates of treatment discontinuation and subsequent restart were observed across all subgroups, implying fluctuating sMRA use. However, heightened cardiovascular risk may decrease the odds of discontinuation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":"16 ","pages":"27-37"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11873017/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143543096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Validation of Mortality Data Sources Compared to the National Death Index in the Healthcare Integrated Research Database. 与医疗保健综合研究数据库中国家死亡指数相比较的死亡率数据源的验证。
IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pub Date : 2025-02-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.2147/POR.S498221
Aziza Jamal-Allial, Todd Sponholtz, Shiva K Vojjala, Mark Paullin, Anahit Papazian, Biruk Eshete, Seyed Hamidreza Mahmoudpour, Patrice Verpillat, Daniel C Beachler

Background: The National Death Index (NDI) is the gold standard for mortality data in the United States (US) but has a time lag and can be operationally intensive. This validation study assesses the accuracy of various mortality data sources with the NDI.

Methods: This validation study is a secondary analysis of an advanced cancer cohort in the US between January 2010 and December 2018, with an established NDI linkage. Mortality data sources, inpatient discharge, disenrollment, death master file (DMF), Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Utilization management data (U.M.), and online obituary data were compared to NDI.

Results: Among 40,692 patients, 25,761 (63.3%) had a death date using NDI; the composite algorithm had a sensitivity of 88.9% (95% CI = 88.5%, 89.3%), specificity was 89.1% (95% CI = 88.6%, 89.6%). At the same time, positive predictive value (PPV) was 93.4% (95% CI = 93.1%, 93.7%), negative predictive value (NPV) was 82.3% (95% CI = 81.7%, 82.9%), and when comparing each individual source, each had a high PPV but limited sensitivity.

Conclusion: The composite algorithm was demonstrated to be a sensitive and precise measure of mortality, while individual database sources were accurate but had limited sensitivity.

背景:国家死亡指数(NDI)是美国死亡率数据的黄金标准,但存在时间滞后,而且可能需要大量操作。本验证研究用NDI评估了各种死亡率数据来源的准确性。方法:本验证研究是对2010年1月至2018年12月期间美国晚期癌症队列的二次分析,具有确定的NDI关联。死亡率数据来源、住院出院、退院、死亡主档案(DMF)、医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)、利用管理数据(U.M.)和在线讣告数据与NDI进行比较。结果:40,692例患者中,25,761例(63.3%)的死亡日期为NDI;复合算法的敏感性为88.9% (95% CI = 88.5%, 89.3%),特异性为89.1% (95% CI = 88.6%, 89.6%)。同时,阳性预测值(PPV)为93.4% (95% CI = 93.1%, 93.7%),阴性预测值(NPV)为82.3% (95% CI = 81.7%, 82.9%),在比较各个来源时,每个来源的PPV都很高,但敏感性有限。结论:复合算法是一种敏感和精确的死亡率测量方法,而单个数据库来源是准确的,但灵敏度有限。
{"title":"Validation of Mortality Data Sources Compared to the National Death Index in the Healthcare Integrated Research Database.","authors":"Aziza Jamal-Allial, Todd Sponholtz, Shiva K Vojjala, Mark Paullin, Anahit Papazian, Biruk Eshete, Seyed Hamidreza Mahmoudpour, Patrice Verpillat, Daniel C Beachler","doi":"10.2147/POR.S498221","DOIUrl":"10.2147/POR.S498221","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The National Death Index (NDI) is the gold standard for mortality data in the United States (US) but has a time lag and can be operationally intensive. This validation study assesses the accuracy of various mortality data sources with the NDI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This validation study is a secondary analysis of an advanced cancer cohort in the US between January 2010 and December 2018, with an established NDI linkage. Mortality data sources, inpatient discharge, disenrollment, death master file (DMF), Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Utilization management data (U.M.), and online obituary data were compared to NDI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 40,692 patients, 25,761 (63.3%) had a death date using NDI; the composite algorithm had a sensitivity of 88.9% (95% CI = 88.5%, 89.3%), specificity was 89.1% (95% CI = 88.6%, 89.6%). At the same time, positive predictive value (PPV) was 93.4% (95% CI = 93.1%, 93.7%), negative predictive value (NPV) was 82.3% (95% CI = 81.7%, 82.9%), and when comparing each individual source, each had a high PPV but limited sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The composite algorithm was demonstrated to be a sensitive and precise measure of mortality, while individual database sources were accurate but had limited sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":"16 ","pages":"19-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11812554/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143399796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Pragmatic and Observational Research
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1