首页 > 最新文献

Psycho‐Oncology最新文献

英文 中文
Coping Strategies and Perception of Patients With Breast Cancer Post-Surgery in an Underserved Region of Nigeria. 尼日利亚服务不足地区乳腺癌术后患者的应对策略和认知。
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1002/pon.70370
Ayodeji A Bioku, Bonnie Lu, Paige Harris, Foluke O Sarimiye, Jummai D Jimeta-Tuko, Navya Manoj, Tinuke O Olagunju, Olubukola O Kolawole, Abdullah H Alqahtani, Britta K Ostermeyer, Andrew T Olagunju

Background: Patients' coping styles, perceptions, and attitudes are important for healthy living and survivorship in breast cancer.

Aim: To assess factors associated with coping styles in patients with breast cancer surgery in an underserved population in Northern Nigeria.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 72 patients with breast cancer post-surgery. Data was collected on clinico-demographic variables, patients' perceptions, the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF), the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), and the Coping Strategy Inventory (CSI-32).

Results: The mean age of participants was 45.9 (±9.1) years. Over 80% of participants underwent mastectomy, with 93.1% reporting complications. Notwithstanding, participants largely perceived that the procedure was life-saving, and most did not feel the need for a breast prosthesis. Notably, 70.8% reported an increased tendency to withdraw socially, but only 34.7% experienced functional difficulties with daily activities or chores. Patients practiced different engagement-disengagement coping strategies, albeit use of multiple dimensions of engagement coping was pronounced in a greater fraction (percentile) of patients. Multiple aspects of perception (including a lack of satisfaction with clothes fitting, feelings of incompleteness, greater time since surgery), and the experience of psychological distress were associated with disengagement coping. On the other hand, engagement coping was more likely in patients who were satisfied with clothing fit, experienced less impact on daily living, and had an improved quality of life.

Conclusion: Coping in patients with breast cancer post-surgery is multifaceted, varying by individual perception and psychosocial wellbeing. Future research is needed to guide interventions that bolster psychosocial well-being to promote healthy coping.

背景:患者的应对方式、认知和态度对乳腺癌患者的健康生活和生存至关重要。目的:评估尼日利亚北部服务不足人群中乳腺癌手术患者应对方式的相关因素。方法:对72例乳腺癌术后患者进行横断面研究。收集的数据包括临床人口学变量、患者认知、世界卫生组织生活质量(WHOQOL-BREF)、一般健康问卷(GHQ-12)和应对策略量表(CSI-32)。结果:参与者平均年龄为45.9(±9.1)岁。超过80%的参与者接受了乳房切除术,93.1%的人报告了并发症。尽管如此,大部分参与者认为这个手术可以挽救生命,而且大多数人认为没有必要做乳房假体。值得注意的是,70.8%的人表示社交退缩的倾向有所增加,但只有34.7%的人在日常活动或家务方面遇到了功能性困难。患者采用了不同的参与-脱离应对策略,尽管在更大比例(百分位数)的患者中,使用了多个维度的参与应对。感知的多个方面(包括对衣服不满意、不完整的感觉、手术后更长的时间)和心理困扰的经历与脱离应对有关。另一方面,参与性应对更可能发生在那些对服装合身感到满意、日常生活受到的影响较小、生活质量得到改善的患者身上。结论:乳腺癌术后患者的应对是多方面的,因个体认知和心理健康状况而异。未来的研究需要指导加强社会心理健康的干预措施,以促进健康的应对。
{"title":"Coping Strategies and Perception of Patients With Breast Cancer Post-Surgery in an Underserved Region of Nigeria.","authors":"Ayodeji A Bioku, Bonnie Lu, Paige Harris, Foluke O Sarimiye, Jummai D Jimeta-Tuko, Navya Manoj, Tinuke O Olagunju, Olubukola O Kolawole, Abdullah H Alqahtani, Britta K Ostermeyer, Andrew T Olagunju","doi":"10.1002/pon.70370","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pon.70370","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients' coping styles, perceptions, and attitudes are important for healthy living and survivorship in breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess factors associated with coping styles in patients with breast cancer surgery in an underserved population in Northern Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 72 patients with breast cancer post-surgery. Data was collected on clinico-demographic variables, patients' perceptions, the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF), the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), and the Coping Strategy Inventory (CSI-32).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of participants was 45.9 (±9.1) years. Over 80% of participants underwent mastectomy, with 93.1% reporting complications. Notwithstanding, participants largely perceived that the procedure was life-saving, and most did not feel the need for a breast prosthesis. Notably, 70.8% reported an increased tendency to withdraw socially, but only 34.7% experienced functional difficulties with daily activities or chores. Patients practiced different engagement-disengagement coping strategies, albeit use of multiple dimensions of engagement coping was pronounced in a greater fraction (percentile) of patients. Multiple aspects of perception (including a lack of satisfaction with clothes fitting, feelings of incompleteness, greater time since surgery), and the experience of psychological distress were associated with disengagement coping. On the other hand, engagement coping was more likely in patients who were satisfied with clothing fit, experienced less impact on daily living, and had an improved quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Coping in patients with breast cancer post-surgery is multifaceted, varying by individual perception and psychosocial wellbeing. Future research is needed to guide interventions that bolster psychosocial well-being to promote healthy coping.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"35 1","pages":"e70370"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12753331/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145865259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Burnout and Coping Strategies Among Paediatric Oncologists: A Scoping Review. 儿科肿瘤学家的职业倦怠和应对策略:一项范围综述。
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1002/pon.70359
Harshitha D, Vani Verma, Arun Ghoshal, Divya Sussana Patil, Krithika S Rao, Seema R Rao, Amrtavarshini R, Vasudeva Bhat K, Naveen Salins

Background: Paediatric oncologists routinely face emotionally demanding situations, including prolonged exposure to child suffering, ethically complex decision-making, and high clinical workloads. These stressors contribute to burnout, moral distress, and psychological strain, yet their lived experiences remain underexplored.

Objective: To synthesise existing evidence on the psychological challenges experienced by paediatric oncologists, with a focus on burnout, emotional exhaustion, moral distress, and coping strategies.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Five databases [PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL] were searched for English-language studies published between 1992 and April 2025. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria [5 qualitative, 8 quantitative, 1 mixed-methods].

Results: Key psychological stressors included emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation, moral distress, and job dissatisfaction. Coping strategies ranged from peer support and physical activity to institutional interventions such as debriefing sessions and resilience training. Stigma surrounding help-seeking and systemic barriers to emotional support were recurrent themes.

Conclusion: Burnout in paediatric oncology is a multifaceted phenomenon shaped by personal, ethical, and organisational factors. Addressing these challenges requires both individual-level coping mechanisms and systemic reforms, including trauma-informed leadership, confidential mental health support, and the redistribution of workloads. Future research should explore longitudinal outcomes and culturally diverse experiences to inform targeted interventions.

背景:儿科肿瘤学家经常面临情感要求高的情况,包括长期暴露于儿童痛苦,复杂的伦理决策和高临床工作量。这些压力源会导致倦怠、道德困扰和心理压力,但他们的生活经历仍未得到充分探索。目的:综合儿科肿瘤科医生所经历的心理挑战的现有证据,重点是倦怠、情绪衰竭、道德困扰和应对策略。方法:采用Joanna Briggs研究所的方法进行范围审查,并按照PRISMA-ScR指南进行报告。五个数据库[PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, Web of Science和CINAHL]检索了1992年至2025年4月间发表的英语研究。14项研究符合纳入标准[定性方法5项,定量方法8项,混合方法1项]。结果:主要的心理压力源包括情绪衰竭、人格解体、道德困扰和工作不满。应对策略包括同伴支持和体育活动,以及汇报会议和恢复力培训等机构干预措施。围绕寻求帮助的耻辱感和对情感支持的系统性障碍是反复出现的主题。结论:儿科肿瘤患者的职业倦怠是一个由个人、伦理和组织因素共同影响的多层面现象。应对这些挑战既需要个人层面的应对机制,也需要系统性改革,包括了解创伤的领导、保密的精神卫生支持和工作量的再分配。未来的研究应探索纵向结果和文化多样性经验,为有针对性的干预提供信息。
{"title":"Burnout and Coping Strategies Among Paediatric Oncologists: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Harshitha D, Vani Verma, Arun Ghoshal, Divya Sussana Patil, Krithika S Rao, Seema R Rao, Amrtavarshini R, Vasudeva Bhat K, Naveen Salins","doi":"10.1002/pon.70359","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pon.70359","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Paediatric oncologists routinely face emotionally demanding situations, including prolonged exposure to child suffering, ethically complex decision-making, and high clinical workloads. These stressors contribute to burnout, moral distress, and psychological strain, yet their lived experiences remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To synthesise existing evidence on the psychological challenges experienced by paediatric oncologists, with a focus on burnout, emotional exhaustion, moral distress, and coping strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Five databases [PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL] were searched for English-language studies published between 1992 and April 2025. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria [5 qualitative, 8 quantitative, 1 mixed-methods].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key psychological stressors included emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation, moral distress, and job dissatisfaction. Coping strategies ranged from peer support and physical activity to institutional interventions such as debriefing sessions and resilience training. Stigma surrounding help-seeking and systemic barriers to emotional support were recurrent themes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Burnout in paediatric oncology is a multifaceted phenomenon shaped by personal, ethical, and organisational factors. Addressing these challenges requires both individual-level coping mechanisms and systemic reforms, including trauma-informed leadership, confidential mental health support, and the redistribution of workloads. Future research should explore longitudinal outcomes and culturally diverse experiences to inform targeted interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"35 1","pages":"e70359"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12767751/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145906484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cycling Through Uncertainty: The Psychological Experiences of Individuals With Lung Cancer Receiving Immunotherapy And/Or Targeted Therapy. 不确定性循环:接受免疫治疗和/或靶向治疗的肺癌患者的心理体验。
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1002/pon.70372
Alanna K Chu, Emma Kearns, Celeste Holy, Paul Wheatley-Price, Rinat Nissim, Tim Aubry, Sophie Lebel

Background: The recent developments in immunotherapy and targeted therapy drugs offer a new hope for prolonging overall survival and improving quality of life in individuals with advanced lung cancer. However, treatment response to these drugs is variable and unpredictable and early research indicates that these individuals are living with distressing uncertainty and unique supportive care needs.

Aims: Qualitatively characterize the psychological experience of receiving ICI and TT.

Methods: The study design and interview guide were developed with the charitable organization Lung Cancer Canada (LCC) and a patient advisory board. A diverse group of patients with advanced lung cancer receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy were recruited from across Canada. Qualitative interviews (n = 24) explored their unmet needs using the Supportive Care Framework in Cancer Care. A thematic analysis was conducted.

Results: All participants described a similar treatment "cycle" associated with similar experiences and psychological concerns at each phase. Participants described shock and distressing uncertainty in illness at the beginning of treatment and during periods of disease and treatment change. Medically stable periods of treatment response were associated with difficulties with adjustment, coping, and finding new meaning in life. Participants described fear of progression and death anxiety in response to uncertainty in disease and treatment. Various psychological (e.g., acceptance, avoidance, meaning-making) and practical (e.g., social support, information seeking) coping strategies were described.

Conclusions: Advocates, clinicians, researchers, and policymakers should be aware of the unique psychological needs of this growing population. Psychological interventions must address illness uncertainty and corresponding fears and worries.

背景:免疫治疗和靶向治疗药物的最新进展为延长晚期肺癌患者的总生存期和改善生活质量提供了新的希望。然而,对这些药物的治疗反应是可变和不可预测的,早期研究表明,这些个体生活在痛苦的不确定性和独特的支持性护理需求中。目的:定性地描述接受ICI和TT的心理体验。方法:研究设计和访谈指南由加拿大肺癌慈善组织(LCC)和患者咨询委员会共同制定。从加拿大各地招募了一组接受免疫治疗或靶向治疗的晚期肺癌患者。定性访谈(n = 24)利用癌症护理中的支持性护理框架探讨了他们未满足的需求。进行了专题分析。结果:所有参与者描述了一个相似的治疗“周期”,与每个阶段相似的经历和心理问题相关。参与者描述了在治疗开始时以及在疾病和治疗变化期间对疾病的震惊和痛苦的不确定性。医学上稳定的治疗反应期与适应、应对和寻找生活新意义方面的困难有关。参与者描述了对疾病和治疗不确定性的进展恐惧和死亡焦虑。描述了各种心理应对策略(如接受、回避、意义建构)和实践应对策略(如社会支持、信息寻求)。结论:倡导者、临床医生、研究人员和政策制定者应该意识到这一不断增长的人口的独特心理需求。心理干预必须解决疾病的不确定性以及相应的恐惧和担忧。
{"title":"Cycling Through Uncertainty: The Psychological Experiences of Individuals With Lung Cancer Receiving Immunotherapy And/Or Targeted Therapy.","authors":"Alanna K Chu, Emma Kearns, Celeste Holy, Paul Wheatley-Price, Rinat Nissim, Tim Aubry, Sophie Lebel","doi":"10.1002/pon.70372","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pon.70372","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The recent developments in immunotherapy and targeted therapy drugs offer a new hope for prolonging overall survival and improving quality of life in individuals with advanced lung cancer. However, treatment response to these drugs is variable and unpredictable and early research indicates that these individuals are living with distressing uncertainty and unique supportive care needs.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>Qualitatively characterize the psychological experience of receiving ICI and TT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study design and interview guide were developed with the charitable organization Lung Cancer Canada (LCC) and a patient advisory board. A diverse group of patients with advanced lung cancer receiving immunotherapy or targeted therapy were recruited from across Canada. Qualitative interviews (n = 24) explored their unmet needs using the Supportive Care Framework in Cancer Care. A thematic analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participants described a similar treatment \"cycle\" associated with similar experiences and psychological concerns at each phase. Participants described shock and distressing uncertainty in illness at the beginning of treatment and during periods of disease and treatment change. Medically stable periods of treatment response were associated with difficulties with adjustment, coping, and finding new meaning in life. Participants described fear of progression and death anxiety in response to uncertainty in disease and treatment. Various psychological (e.g., acceptance, avoidance, meaning-making) and practical (e.g., social support, information seeking) coping strategies were described.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Advocates, clinicians, researchers, and policymakers should be aware of the unique psychological needs of this growing population. Psychological interventions must address illness uncertainty and corresponding fears and worries.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"35 1","pages":"e70372"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12779583/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145918298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Impact of Self-Directed Aftercare Following Breast Cancer Surgery: A Scoping Review. 乳腺癌手术后自我指导后护理的影响:一项范围综述。
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1002/pon.70368
Anna T Isaac, Olinda Santin, Gareth W Irwin, Katherine Mankelow, Louise V Cousins, Stuart A McIntosh

Purpose: With over 56,000 new cases of breast cancer a year in the UK and 76% of these expected to live beyond 10 years, managing long-term care and support is an urgent challenge. This scoping review aims to map the current literature on outcomes and lived experience of Self-Directed Aftercare (SDA) pathways following breast cancer surgery. We aim to assess what evidence exists to support the current delivery of this approach.

Methods: A scoping review in line with the PRISMA-ScR template was undertaken across 3 databases (Web of Science, PubMED and OVID Medline) using an iteratively developed search strategy based on concepts of "breast cancer", "self-directed" and "aftercare". Screening was undertaken by all authors and disagreements settled by team discussion. Key data were extracted from qualitative and quantitative studies, with descriptive statistical and thematic analysis conducted.

Conclusions: Available literature is sparse and of variable quality. While reductions in clinic attendance are reported, there is a wide range of patient lived experience. There are positive reports of the convenience of SDA, while negative aspects included unmet psychological and information needs, which also changed over time. Ease of access to speciality breast advice varied across studies.

Implications for cancer survivors: Globally more patients are being managed via SDA, but this review demonstrates the lack of research assessing the safety, acceptability, and cost-effectiveness of this approach. It is imperative that services address the evolving needs of breast cancer survivors and integrate feedback from patients with lived experience of breast cancer aftercare.

Trail registration: This project has been publicly registered with the Open Science Framework (July 2024). It can be found under the project "Exploring oncological outcomes and lived experiences of patients and their carers managed via self-directed aftercare pathways following breast cancer surgery" available at https://osf.io/b56vq/.

目的:在英国,每年有超过56000例乳腺癌新病例,其中76%的人预计寿命超过10年,管理长期护理和支持是一项紧迫的挑战。本综述旨在对乳腺癌手术后自我指导术后护理(SDA)途径的结果和生活经验进行综述。我们的目标是评估有哪些证据支持目前这种方法的实施。方法:采用基于“乳腺癌”、“自我指导”和“术后护理”概念迭代开发的搜索策略,根据prism - scr模板在3个数据库(Web of Science、PubMED和OVID Medline)中进行范围审查。筛选由所有作者进行,分歧由团队讨论解决。从定性和定量研究中提取关键数据,并进行描述性统计和专题分析。结论:现有文献较少,质量参差不齐。虽然据报道,就诊人数有所减少,但患者生活经验的范围很广。有关于SDA便利的积极报告,而消极方面包括未满足的心理和信息需求,这些需求也随着时间的推移而改变。获得专业乳房建议的难易程度因研究而异。对癌症幸存者的影响:全球越来越多的患者正在通过SDA进行治疗,但本综述表明缺乏评估这种方法的安全性、可接受性和成本效益的研究。服务必须满足乳腺癌幸存者不断变化的需求,并整合有乳腺癌善后护理生活经验的患者的反馈。试验注册:该项目已在开放科学框架(2024年7月)公开注册。它可以在“探索乳腺癌手术后患者及其护理人员通过自我指导的护理途径管理的肿瘤结果和生活经历”项目下找到,可在https://osf.io/b56vq/上找到。
{"title":"The Impact of Self-Directed Aftercare Following Breast Cancer Surgery: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Anna T Isaac, Olinda Santin, Gareth W Irwin, Katherine Mankelow, Louise V Cousins, Stuart A McIntosh","doi":"10.1002/pon.70368","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pon.70368","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>With over 56,000 new cases of breast cancer a year in the UK and 76% of these expected to live beyond 10 years, managing long-term care and support is an urgent challenge. This scoping review aims to map the current literature on outcomes and lived experience of Self-Directed Aftercare (SDA) pathways following breast cancer surgery. We aim to assess what evidence exists to support the current delivery of this approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review in line with the PRISMA-ScR template was undertaken across 3 databases (Web of Science, PubMED and OVID Medline) using an iteratively developed search strategy based on concepts of \"breast cancer\", \"self-directed\" and \"aftercare\". Screening was undertaken by all authors and disagreements settled by team discussion. Key data were extracted from qualitative and quantitative studies, with descriptive statistical and thematic analysis conducted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Available literature is sparse and of variable quality. While reductions in clinic attendance are reported, there is a wide range of patient lived experience. There are positive reports of the convenience of SDA, while negative aspects included unmet psychological and information needs, which also changed over time. Ease of access to speciality breast advice varied across studies.</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>Globally more patients are being managed via SDA, but this review demonstrates the lack of research assessing the safety, acceptability, and cost-effectiveness of this approach. It is imperative that services address the evolving needs of breast cancer survivors and integrate feedback from patients with lived experience of breast cancer aftercare.</p><p><strong>Trail registration: </strong>This project has been publicly registered with the Open Science Framework (July 2024). It can be found under the project \"Exploring oncological outcomes and lived experiences of patients and their carers managed via self-directed aftercare pathways following breast cancer surgery\" available at https://osf.io/b56vq/.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"35 1","pages":"e70368"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12747846/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145857609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Masculinity and Cancer Survivorship: A Systematic Review. 男性气质与癌症存活:系统回顾。
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1002/pon.70364
Zixia Wang, Ryan Shahrokni, Michael A Hoyt

Background: Masculinity has been identified as a potential influence on psychological and physical health outcomes among male cancer survivors. This systematic review synthesized quantitative research examining associations between masculinity-related constructs and survivorship outcomes, including mental health, physical functioning, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Methods: A systematic search of PsycINFO, CINAHL, and PubMed was conducted through March 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they quantitatively assessed masculinity-related variables in male cancer survivors and reported associations with HRQoL, mental health, or physical health outcomes. Study quality was assessed and a narrative synthesis was conducted.

Results: Thirty-one studies met inclusion criteria. Traditional masculine norms (e.g., self-reliance, dominance, stoicism) and cancer-related masculine threat were consistently associated with poorer mental health, lower HRQoL, and greater symptom burden. In contrast, masculine self-esteem, a positive appraisal of one's masculinity post-cancer, was linked to better psychosocial outcomes and HRQoL across samples. Most studies were cross-sectional and focused on prostate cancer survivors, often lacking demographic diversity.

Conclusions: Masculinity-related constructs are meaningfully associated with cancer survivorship outcomes. Future work should prioritize longitudinal designs, cultural diversity, and clinical translation to develop gender-sensitive interventions targeting masculine identity disruption and promoting adaptive self-concepts.

背景:男性气质已被确定为男性癌症幸存者心理和身体健康结果的潜在影响因素。本系统综述综合了定量研究,考察了男性气质相关构形与生存结局之间的关系,包括心理健康、身体功能和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。方法:系统检索PsycINFO, CINAHL和PubMed,直到2025年3月,遵循PRISMA指南。如果研究定量评估了男性癌症幸存者的男性气质相关变量,并报告了与HRQoL、心理健康或身体健康结果的关联,则纳入研究。评估研究质量并进行叙事综合。结果:31项研究符合纳入标准。传统的男性规范(例如,自力更生、支配、坚忍)和癌症相关的男性威胁始终与较差的心理健康、较低的HRQoL和更大的症状负担相关。相比之下,男性自尊,即对癌症后男性气概的积极评价,与更好的社会心理结果和HRQoL有关。大多数研究都是横断面的,关注的是前列腺癌幸存者,往往缺乏人口多样性。结论:与男性相关的构念与癌症生存结果有意义相关。未来的工作应优先考虑纵向设计、文化多样性和临床翻译,以开发针对男性身份破坏和促进适应性自我概念的性别敏感干预措施。
{"title":"Masculinity and Cancer Survivorship: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Zixia Wang, Ryan Shahrokni, Michael A Hoyt","doi":"10.1002/pon.70364","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pon.70364","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Masculinity has been identified as a potential influence on psychological and physical health outcomes among male cancer survivors. This systematic review synthesized quantitative research examining associations between masculinity-related constructs and survivorship outcomes, including mental health, physical functioning, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PsycINFO, CINAHL, and PubMed was conducted through March 2025, following PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they quantitatively assessed masculinity-related variables in male cancer survivors and reported associations with HRQoL, mental health, or physical health outcomes. Study quality was assessed and a narrative synthesis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one studies met inclusion criteria. Traditional masculine norms (e.g., self-reliance, dominance, stoicism) and cancer-related masculine threat were consistently associated with poorer mental health, lower HRQoL, and greater symptom burden. In contrast, masculine self-esteem, a positive appraisal of one's masculinity post-cancer, was linked to better psychosocial outcomes and HRQoL across samples. Most studies were cross-sectional and focused on prostate cancer survivors, often lacking demographic diversity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Masculinity-related constructs are meaningfully associated with cancer survivorship outcomes. Future work should prioritize longitudinal designs, cultural diversity, and clinical translation to develop gender-sensitive interventions targeting masculine identity disruption and promoting adaptive self-concepts.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"35 1","pages":"e70364"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145865224","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
AI-Enhanced Versus Clinician-Guided Expressive Writing for Improving Psychological Well-Being in Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial. 人工智能增强与临床医生指导的表达性写作对改善癌症幸存者心理健康的影响:一项随机对照试验
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1002/pon.70386
Xueling Yang, Yongxin Huo, Yishu Wang, Mingpei Li, Ran Zhang, Ling Liu, Yu Chen, You Wang

Aims: Digital tools offer scalable support for cancer survivors' psychological well-being, however, direct efficacy comparisons between artificial intelligence (AI)-Enhanced and clinician-guided digital interventions are scarce. This study evaluated an AI-Enhanced expressive writing intervention against clinician-guided digital support and usual care for cancer survivors.

Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 120 cancer survivors (111 completers) were randomized (1:1:1) to AI-Enhanced, clinician-guided, or usual care groups for a 4-week expressive writing intervention. Outcomes, including depression, anxiety, fear of progression (FoP), and resilience, were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up between September 2024 and April 2025. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVAs and thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews.

Results: Both AI and clinician-guided interventions significantly reduced depression (AI: d = 0.92; Clinician: d = 0.98) and anxiety (AI: d = 0.59; Clinician: d = 0.66) versus usual care, with comparable efficacy. However, clinician-guided support demonstrated greater efficacy in reducing FoP (d = 0.62 vs. AI). Resilience improved over time across all groups, with no significant inter-group differences. Qualitatively, AI offered reduced stigma and accessibility, while the clinician-guided approach provided valued empathetic connection.

Conclusion: AI-Enhanced expressive writing is a viable, scalable tool for reducing depression and anxiety in cancer survivors. Yet, the greater efficacy of clinician-guided digital support for complex issues like FoP highlights the value of human-mediated empathy. This advocates for hybrid models in psychological care that integrate AI's scalability with the relational depth of clinical expertise to enhance survivor well-being.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400089455).

目的:数字工具为癌症幸存者的心理健康提供了可扩展的支持,然而,人工智能(AI)增强和临床医生指导的数字干预之间的直接疗效比较很少。本研究评估了人工智能增强的表达性写作干预对临床医生指导的数字支持和癌症幸存者的常规护理的影响。方法:在这项随机对照试验中,120名癌症幸存者(111名完成者)被随机分为人工智能增强组、临床指导组和常规护理组,进行为期4周的表达性写作干预。在2024年9月至2025年4月的基线、干预后和1个月随访期间评估了包括抑郁、焦虑、进展恐惧(FoP)和恢复力在内的结果。数据分析采用重复测量方差分析和半结构化访谈的专题分析。结果:与常规治疗相比,人工智能和临床医生指导的干预均能显著减少抑郁(AI: d = 0.92;临床医生:d = 0.98)和焦虑(AI: d = 0.59;临床医生:d = 0.66),疗效相当。然而,临床指导的支持在减少FoP方面表现出更大的功效(d = 0.62 vs. AI)。随着时间的推移,所有组的恢复力都有所提高,组间没有显著差异。从质量上讲,人工智能减少了耻辱感和可及性,而临床医生指导的方法提供了有价值的移情联系。结论:人工智能增强的表达性写作是一种可行的、可扩展的工具,可以减少癌症幸存者的抑郁和焦虑。然而,临床医生指导的数字支持对FoP等复杂问题的更大功效凸显了人类介导的同理心的价值。这提倡在心理护理中采用混合模型,将人工智能的可扩展性与临床专业知识的关系深度相结合,以提高幸存者的福祉。试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2400089455)。
{"title":"AI-Enhanced Versus Clinician-Guided Expressive Writing for Improving Psychological Well-Being in Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Xueling Yang, Yongxin Huo, Yishu Wang, Mingpei Li, Ran Zhang, Ling Liu, Yu Chen, You Wang","doi":"10.1002/pon.70386","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70386","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Digital tools offer scalable support for cancer survivors' psychological well-being, however, direct efficacy comparisons between artificial intelligence (AI)-Enhanced and clinician-guided digital interventions are scarce. This study evaluated an AI-Enhanced expressive writing intervention against clinician-guided digital support and usual care for cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial, 120 cancer survivors (111 completers) were randomized (1:1:1) to AI-Enhanced, clinician-guided, or usual care groups for a 4-week expressive writing intervention. Outcomes, including depression, anxiety, fear of progression (FoP), and resilience, were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up between September 2024 and April 2025. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVAs and thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both AI and clinician-guided interventions significantly reduced depression (AI: d = 0.92; Clinician: d = 0.98) and anxiety (AI: d = 0.59; Clinician: d = 0.66) versus usual care, with comparable efficacy. However, clinician-guided support demonstrated greater efficacy in reducing FoP (d = 0.62 vs. AI). Resilience improved over time across all groups, with no significant inter-group differences. Qualitatively, AI offered reduced stigma and accessibility, while the clinician-guided approach provided valued empathetic connection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI-Enhanced expressive writing is a viable, scalable tool for reducing depression and anxiety in cancer survivors. Yet, the greater efficacy of clinician-guided digital support for complex issues like FoP highlights the value of human-mediated empathy. This advocates for hybrid models in psychological care that integrate AI's scalability with the relational depth of clinical expertise to enhance survivor well-being.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400089455).</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"35 1","pages":"e70386"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145990612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Beyond Physical Toxicities: Identifying Psychosocial Domains Requiring Integrated Support in Breast Cancer Pharmacotherapy. 超越物理毒性:确定乳腺癌药物治疗中需要综合支持的社会心理领域。
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1002/pon.70393
Henry Sutanto, Ami Ashariati, Merlyna Savitri, Een Hendarsih

Background: Cancer pharmacotherapy imposes substantial physical and psychosocial burdens that affect patients' quality of life (QoL). While oncologic outcomes are well studied, the psychological dimensions-particularly future perspective, emotional resilience, and body image-remain underintegrated into routine care. The growing recognition of psycho-oncology highlights the need for synergistic collaboration between oncology and clinical psychology.

Aim: To evaluate changes in QoL before and after pharmacotherapy among women with breast cancer and identify domains most vulnerable to psychological distress, thereby informing the need for integrated psycho-oncologic care.

Methods: This prospective study included 106 women with breast cancer undergoing pharmacotherapy. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were collected, including cancer stage, treatment modalities, and baseline cardiometabolic parameters. QoL was assessed pre- and post-treatment using EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 instruments. Paired comparisons were performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and correlations with age were analyzed using Spearman or Pearson methods as appropriate.

Results: Global health status declined significantly after pharmacotherapy (83.3 to 66.7; p = 0.002). Functional domains-including physical, role, and social functioning-also worsened, while emotional functioning improved modestly. Symptom burden increased across fatigue, nausea, pain, appetite loss, and systemic side effects (all p < 0.001). Breast-cancer-specific domains such as body image and future perspective showed minimal change but remained highly variable, indicating psychosocial vulnerability. Distress related to hair loss demonstrated a modest inverse correlation with age (r = -0.296; p = 0.003).

Conclusion: Pharmacotherapy substantially reduces multiple QoL domains, highlighting symptom-function trade-offs and persistent psychological concerns. The patterns in emotional functioning and future perspective indicate unmet psychosocial needs. These findings underscore the imperative for integrated psycho-oncology models to enhance holistic survivorship care.

背景:癌症药物治疗会给患者带来巨大的生理和心理负担,影响患者的生活质量(QoL)。虽然肿瘤学的结果已经得到了很好的研究,但心理方面——特别是未来的前景、情绪恢复能力和身体形象——仍然没有被纳入常规护理。对心理肿瘤学日益增长的认识突出了肿瘤学和临床心理学之间协同合作的需要。目的:评价乳腺癌患者药物治疗前后生活质量的变化,确定最易发生心理困扰的领域,从而为开展综合心理肿瘤学护理提供依据。方法:本前瞻性研究纳入106例接受药物治疗的乳腺癌患者。收集了社会人口学和临床特征,包括癌症分期、治疗方式和基线心脏代谢参数。使用EORTC QLQ-C30和BR23仪器评估治疗前后的生活质量。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行配对比较,并酌情使用Spearman或Pearson方法分析与年龄的相关性。结果:药物治疗后全球健康状况显著下降(83.3至66.7;p = 0.002)。包括身体、角色和社会功能在内的功能领域也在恶化,而情感功能则略有改善。疲劳、恶心、疼痛、食欲减退和全身副作用均增加了症状负担(均为p)结论:药物治疗显著降低了多个生活质量域,突出了症状功能权衡和持续的心理担忧。情感功能模式和未来前景表明未满足的社会心理需求。这些发现强调了整合心理肿瘤学模型以增强整体生存护理的必要性。
{"title":"Beyond Physical Toxicities: Identifying Psychosocial Domains Requiring Integrated Support in Breast Cancer Pharmacotherapy.","authors":"Henry Sutanto, Ami Ashariati, Merlyna Savitri, Een Hendarsih","doi":"10.1002/pon.70393","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pon.70393","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer pharmacotherapy imposes substantial physical and psychosocial burdens that affect patients' quality of life (QoL). While oncologic outcomes are well studied, the psychological dimensions-particularly future perspective, emotional resilience, and body image-remain underintegrated into routine care. The growing recognition of psycho-oncology highlights the need for synergistic collaboration between oncology and clinical psychology.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate changes in QoL before and after pharmacotherapy among women with breast cancer and identify domains most vulnerable to psychological distress, thereby informing the need for integrated psycho-oncologic care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study included 106 women with breast cancer undergoing pharmacotherapy. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were collected, including cancer stage, treatment modalities, and baseline cardiometabolic parameters. QoL was assessed pre- and post-treatment using EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 instruments. Paired comparisons were performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and correlations with age were analyzed using Spearman or Pearson methods as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Global health status declined significantly after pharmacotherapy (83.3 to 66.7; p = 0.002). Functional domains-including physical, role, and social functioning-also worsened, while emotional functioning improved modestly. Symptom burden increased across fatigue, nausea, pain, appetite loss, and systemic side effects (all p < 0.001). Breast-cancer-specific domains such as body image and future perspective showed minimal change but remained highly variable, indicating psychosocial vulnerability. Distress related to hair loss demonstrated a modest inverse correlation with age (r = -0.296; p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pharmacotherapy substantially reduces multiple QoL domains, highlighting symptom-function trade-offs and persistent psychological concerns. The patterns in emotional functioning and future perspective indicate unmet psychosocial needs. These findings underscore the imperative for integrated psycho-oncology models to enhance holistic survivorship care.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"35 1","pages":"e70393"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146041558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
"I Am Not the One That Caused Your Illness": Lung Cancer Stigma in Nigeria. “你的病不是我造成的”:尼日利亚的肺癌耻辱。
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1002/pon.70362
Smita C Banerjee, Jaime Gilliland, Chioma Asuzu, Boladale Mapayi, Joyce M Terwase, Ameish Govindarajan, Blessing Olunloyo, Emeka Odiaka, Oluwafemi B Daramola, Israel Adeyemi Owoade, Peter Kingham, Olusegun I Alatise, Rivka Kahn, Cristina Olcese, Jamie S Ostroff

Background: Global illness-related stigma is increasingly recognized as a formidable barrier to health-seeking behavior, engagement in care, and adherence to treatments across a range of disease conditions. Stigma is experienced by many patients with lung cancer (PwLC) in the United States; however, less is known about how lung cancer stigma operates in Nigeria.

Aims: This qualitative study was conducted to describe lung cancer stigma and examine the cultural adaptability of the conceptual model of lung cancer stigma in Nigeria.

Methods: Individual and small group interviews were conducted with PwLC (N = 16) at University College Hospital (UCH), Ibadan and at Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex (OAU), Ile-Ife.

Results: Data analyses revealed that overall, the responses mapped onto the conceptual model of lung cancer stigma and participants described their perceptions of others' stigmatizing attitudes or behaviors, consistent with "perceived stigma" as well as feelings of self-blame, guilt, shame, and regret, consistent with "internalized stigma." Participants also characterized both adaptive and maladaptive consequences of stigma, including distress/depression and constrained disclosure. Further, participants described some specific cultural contexts (moderators) that are important in understanding the landscape of lung cancer stigma in Nigeria, namely causal attributions, cancer as a spiritual attack, financial constraints, systemic delays, and non-disclosure by clinicians.

Conclusions: PwLC experience stigma in Nigeria, which may get triggered during clinical interactions with oncology care clinicians. Communication skills trainings for clinicians in empathy and compassion may help mitigate lung cancer stigma and improve quality of care for PwLC in Nigeria.

背景:全球疾病相关的耻辱感日益被认为是在一系列疾病条件下寻求健康行为、参与护理和坚持治疗的巨大障碍。在美国,许多肺癌(PwLC)患者都经历过耻辱;然而,人们对尼日利亚的肺癌污名是如何运作的知之甚少。目的:本定性研究旨在描述肺癌病耻感,并检验尼日利亚肺癌病耻感概念模型的文化适应性。方法:在伊巴丹大学学院医院(UCH)和伊莱- ife奥巴费米-阿沃洛沃大学教学医院(OAU)采用PwLC进行个人和小组访谈(N = 16)。结果:数据分析显示,总体而言,参与者的回答映射到肺癌污名化的概念模型,参与者描述了他们对他人污名化态度或行为的看法,与“感知污名化”一致,以及自责、内疚、羞耻和后悔的感觉,与“内化污名化”一致。参与者还描述了耻辱的适应和不适应后果,包括痛苦/抑郁和约束披露。此外,与会者还描述了一些特定的文化背景(调节因素),这些文化背景对于理解尼日利亚肺癌污名的情况很重要,即因果归因、癌症作为一种精神攻击、财政限制、系统性延误和临床医生不披露。结论:尼日利亚的PwLC经历了耻辱,这可能是在与肿瘤护理临床医生的临床互动中引发的。对临床医生进行移情和同情方面的沟通技巧培训,可能有助于减轻尼日利亚对肺癌的耻辱感,提高对PwLC的护理质量。
{"title":"\"I Am Not the One That Caused Your Illness\": Lung Cancer Stigma in Nigeria.","authors":"Smita C Banerjee, Jaime Gilliland, Chioma Asuzu, Boladale Mapayi, Joyce M Terwase, Ameish Govindarajan, Blessing Olunloyo, Emeka Odiaka, Oluwafemi B Daramola, Israel Adeyemi Owoade, Peter Kingham, Olusegun I Alatise, Rivka Kahn, Cristina Olcese, Jamie S Ostroff","doi":"10.1002/pon.70362","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pon.70362","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Global illness-related stigma is increasingly recognized as a formidable barrier to health-seeking behavior, engagement in care, and adherence to treatments across a range of disease conditions. Stigma is experienced by many patients with lung cancer (PwLC) in the United States; however, less is known about how lung cancer stigma operates in Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This qualitative study was conducted to describe lung cancer stigma and examine the cultural adaptability of the conceptual model of lung cancer stigma in Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individual and small group interviews were conducted with PwLC (N = 16) at University College Hospital (UCH), Ibadan and at Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals Complex (OAU), Ile-Ife.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data analyses revealed that overall, the responses mapped onto the conceptual model of lung cancer stigma and participants described their perceptions of others' stigmatizing attitudes or behaviors, consistent with \"perceived stigma\" as well as feelings of self-blame, guilt, shame, and regret, consistent with \"internalized stigma.\" Participants also characterized both adaptive and maladaptive consequences of stigma, including distress/depression and constrained disclosure. Further, participants described some specific cultural contexts (moderators) that are important in understanding the landscape of lung cancer stigma in Nigeria, namely causal attributions, cancer as a spiritual attack, financial constraints, systemic delays, and non-disclosure by clinicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PwLC experience stigma in Nigeria, which may get triggered during clinical interactions with oncology care clinicians. Communication skills trainings for clinicians in empathy and compassion may help mitigate lung cancer stigma and improve quality of care for PwLC in Nigeria.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"35 1","pages":"e70362"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12839206/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145865207","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association of Multi-Level LGBTQ+ Stigma and Hypervigilance With Health Outcomes Among LGBTQ+ Cancer Caregivers. LGBTQ+癌症照护者多层次的LGBTQ+耻辱和高度警惕与健康结局的关系
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1002/pon.70379
Austin R Waters, Brittany M Charlton, Camille R Murray, Shaun R Jones, Echo L Warner, Lorinda A Coombs, Heidi S Donovan, Zhirui Deng, Dianxu Ren, Barbara L Fredrickson, Hazel B Nichols, Erin E Kent, Kelly R Tan

Background: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and gender minority (LGBTQ+) individuals in the US face significant health inequities driven by structural stigma. However, the health impacts of LGBTQ+ stigma and hypervigilance among LGBTQ+ individuals who are also a cancer caregiver are understudied.

Methods: LGBTQ+ adults in the US who provided unpaid care to a cancer patient ( $mathit{le }$  3 years prior) were recruited for an online survey. Survey domains/measures included sociodemographics, State Equality Index, Sexual Stigma Scale (adapted), Riggle Hypervigilance Measure, as well as health outcomes (PROMIS anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, and fatigue). Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to group participants based on LGBTQ+ stigma and hypervigilance scores. Multivariable linear regression models tested the association between LCA classes and each PROMIS measure.

Results: Among 332 LGBTQ+ cancer caregivers, LCA identified four distinct classes: 1. Low stigma and hypervigilance (31.0%), 2. Moderate stigma and behavioral hypervigilance (21.7%), 3. Moderate contextual hypervigilance and scanning (19.3%), and 4. High stigma and hypervigilance (28.0%). In multivariable linear regression models, class 4 was associated with a 10.43-unit higher anxiety T-score (95% CI: 7.75-13.11), a 9.61 unit higher depression T-score (95% CI: 6.67-12.54), a 9.50-unit higher sleep disturbance T-score (95% CI: 7.02-11.98), and a 12.11-unit higher fatigue T-score (95% CI: 8.88-15.35) in comparison to class 1. Similar, but lower magnitude, trends were seen across the associations of classes 2 and 3.

Conclusions: The findings of this study algin with the LGBTQ+ literature and suggest that among LGBTQ+ cancer caregivers, increased levels of LGBTQ+ stigma and the resulting hypervigilance drive health inequities.

背景:美国的女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、酷儿和其他性少数群体(LGBTQ+)在结构性污名的推动下面临着严重的健康不平等。然而,LGBTQ+的耻辱感和对癌症护理者的过度警惕对LGBTQ+个体的健康影响尚未得到充分研究。方法:在美国招募为一名癌症患者提供无偿护理的LGBTQ+成年人(3年前≤$ $ mathit{le}$)进行在线调查。调查领域/措施包括社会人口统计学、州平等指数、性污名量表(改编)、里格尔过度警惕量表以及健康结果(PROMIS焦虑、抑郁、睡眠障碍和疲劳)。基于LGBTQ+病耻感和超警觉性评分,采用潜类分析(LCA)对参与者进行分组。多变量线性回归模型检验了LCA类别与各PROMIS测量之间的关联。结果:在332名LGBTQ+癌症护理人员中,LCA确定了四个不同的类别:1;低柱头和高度警惕(31.0%);2 .中度耻感和行为过度警觉(21.7%);中度情境过度警觉和扫描(19.3%);高柱头和高度警惕(28.0%)。在多变量线性回归模型中,与1类患者相比,4类患者焦虑t -评分高10.43个单位(95% CI: 7.75-13.11),抑郁t -评分高9.61个单位(95% CI: 6.67-12.54),睡眠障碍t -评分高9.50个单位(95% CI: 7.02-11.98),疲劳t -评分高12.11个单位(95% CI: 8.88-15.35)。类似的,但较低的幅度,趋势可以在2类和3类的关联中看到。结论:本研究的结果与LGBTQ+文献一致,并表明在LGBTQ+癌症护理人员中,LGBTQ+的耻辱感和由此产生的过度警惕加剧了健康不平等。
{"title":"Association of Multi-Level LGBTQ+ Stigma and Hypervigilance With Health Outcomes Among LGBTQ+ Cancer Caregivers.","authors":"Austin R Waters, Brittany M Charlton, Camille R Murray, Shaun R Jones, Echo L Warner, Lorinda A Coombs, Heidi S Donovan, Zhirui Deng, Dianxu Ren, Barbara L Fredrickson, Hazel B Nichols, Erin E Kent, Kelly R Tan","doi":"10.1002/pon.70379","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pon.70379","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and gender minority (LGBTQ+) individuals in the US face significant health inequities driven by structural stigma. However, the health impacts of LGBTQ+ stigma and hypervigilance among LGBTQ+ individuals who are also a cancer caregiver are understudied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>LGBTQ+ adults in the US who provided unpaid care to a cancer patient ( <math> <semantics><mrow><mo>≤</mo></mrow> <annotation>$mathit{le }$</annotation></semantics> </math>  3 years prior) were recruited for an online survey. Survey domains/measures included sociodemographics, State Equality Index, Sexual Stigma Scale (adapted), Riggle Hypervigilance Measure, as well as health outcomes (PROMIS anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, and fatigue). Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to group participants based on LGBTQ+ stigma and hypervigilance scores. Multivariable linear regression models tested the association between LCA classes and each PROMIS measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 332 LGBTQ+ cancer caregivers, LCA identified four distinct classes: 1. Low stigma and hypervigilance (31.0%), 2. Moderate stigma and behavioral hypervigilance (21.7%), 3. Moderate contextual hypervigilance and scanning (19.3%), and 4. High stigma and hypervigilance (28.0%). In multivariable linear regression models, class 4 was associated with a 10.43-unit higher anxiety T-score (95% CI: 7.75-13.11), a 9.61 unit higher depression T-score (95% CI: 6.67-12.54), a 9.50-unit higher sleep disturbance T-score (95% CI: 7.02-11.98), and a 12.11-unit higher fatigue T-score (95% CI: 8.88-15.35) in comparison to class 1. Similar, but lower magnitude, trends were seen across the associations of classes 2 and 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study algin with the LGBTQ+ literature and suggest that among LGBTQ+ cancer caregivers, increased levels of LGBTQ+ stigma and the resulting hypervigilance drive health inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"35 1","pages":"e70379"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12818097/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146012349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of a Social Media-Based Life Review Intervention on Happiness in Advanced Cancer Patients and Their Family Caregivers: A Mixed-Methods Study. 基于社交媒体的生活回顾干预对晚期癌症患者及其家庭照顾者幸福感的有效性:一项混合方法研究
IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1002/pon.70374
Wen-Chi Yang, Chung-Yi Li, Ching-Liang Ho, Ping-Ying Chang, Li-Fen Wu, Hsueh-Hsing Pan

Objectives: This study evaluated the effectiveness of a social media-based life review intervention on happiness in advanced cancer patient-caregiver dyads and explored participants' subjective experiences.

Methods: A mixed-methods design was employed in oncology wards of a medical center in northern Taiwan between September 2024 and January 2025. Sixty patient-caregiver dyads were recruited through convenience sampling and randomly assigned to an experimental (social media-based life review) or control group (standard care). Final analysis included 28 dyads in the experimental group and 29 in the control group. Quantitative data were collected at baseline and post-intervention using the Subjective Happiness Scale and analyzed with descriptive statistics, t-tests, chi-square tests, and generalized estimating equations (GEE). Qualitative data were collected through two consecutive semi-structured interviews and were analyzed thematically to explore participants' experiences of happiness.

Results: Patients in the experimental group maintained stable happiness, whereas those in the control group decline significantly (p = 0.023). Between-group differences were non-significant. Caregivers in the experimental group demonstrated a significant improvement in happiness (p = 0.025), with no change in control group. Patient happiness was positively associated with family support and self-acceptance, whereas caregiver happiness was influenced by age, family support, and patient educational. Qualitative themes were "Always being there is happiness" and "Rediscovering us through memories."

Conclusion: Social media-based life review intervention enhanced caregiver happiness and prevented decline in patient happiness, highlighting the potential of digitally mediated, family-centered interventions in advanced cancer care.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06559917.

目的:本研究评估基于社交媒体的生活回顾干预对晚期癌症患者-照顾者二元幸福感的有效性,并探讨参与者的主观体验。方法:采用混合方法设计,于2024年9月至2025年1月在台湾北部某医疗中心的肿瘤病房进行研究。通过方便抽样招募了60对患者-护理者,并随机分配到实验组(基于社交媒体的生活回顾组)或对照组(标准护理组)。最终分析结果为实验组28对,对照组29对。采用主观幸福感量表在基线和干预后收集定量数据,并采用描述性统计、t检验、卡方检验和广义估计方程(GEE)进行分析。通过两次连续的半结构化访谈收集定性数据,并对主题进行分析,以探索参与者的幸福体验。结果:实验组患者幸福感保持稳定,对照组患者幸福感明显下降(p = 0.023)。组间差异无统计学意义。实验组照顾者的幸福感有显著提高(p = 0.025),对照组没有变化。患者幸福感与家庭支持和自我接纳呈正相关,而照顾者幸福感受年龄、家庭支持和患者教育程度的影响。定性主题是“一直在那里就是幸福”和“通过记忆重新发现我们”。结论:基于社交媒体的生活回顾干预提高了护理人员的幸福感,防止了患者幸福感的下降,突出了数字媒介、以家庭为中心的干预在晚期癌症治疗中的潜力。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06559917。
{"title":"Effectiveness of a Social Media-Based Life Review Intervention on Happiness in Advanced Cancer Patients and Their Family Caregivers: A Mixed-Methods Study.","authors":"Wen-Chi Yang, Chung-Yi Li, Ching-Liang Ho, Ping-Ying Chang, Li-Fen Wu, Hsueh-Hsing Pan","doi":"10.1002/pon.70374","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pon.70374","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the effectiveness of a social media-based life review intervention on happiness in advanced cancer patient-caregiver dyads and explored participants' subjective experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-methods design was employed in oncology wards of a medical center in northern Taiwan between September 2024 and January 2025. Sixty patient-caregiver dyads were recruited through convenience sampling and randomly assigned to an experimental (social media-based life review) or control group (standard care). Final analysis included 28 dyads in the experimental group and 29 in the control group. Quantitative data were collected at baseline and post-intervention using the Subjective Happiness Scale and analyzed with descriptive statistics, t-tests, chi-square tests, and generalized estimating equations (GEE). Qualitative data were collected through two consecutive semi-structured interviews and were analyzed thematically to explore participants' experiences of happiness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the experimental group maintained stable happiness, whereas those in the control group decline significantly (p = 0.023). Between-group differences were non-significant. Caregivers in the experimental group demonstrated a significant improvement in happiness (p = 0.025), with no change in control group. Patient happiness was positively associated with family support and self-acceptance, whereas caregiver happiness was influenced by age, family support, and patient educational. Qualitative themes were \"Always being there is happiness\" and \"Rediscovering us through memories.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Social media-based life review intervention enhanced caregiver happiness and prevented decline in patient happiness, highlighting the potential of digitally mediated, family-centered interventions in advanced cancer care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06559917.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"35 1","pages":"e70374"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12757199/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145889703","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1