首页 > 最新文献

Prostate International最新文献

英文 中文
Comparisons of three scoring systems based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer 基于双参数磁共振成像的三种评分系统在预测具有临床意义的前列腺癌方面的比较
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.08.002
Wei Li, Haibing Xu, Wenwen Shang, Guohui Hong
In this study, we aimed to validate and compare three scoring systems based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in biopsy-naïve patients. In this study, we included patients who underwent MRI examinations between January 2018 and December 2022, with MRI-targeted fusion biopsy (MRGB) as the reference standard. The MRI findings were categorized using three bpMRI-based scorings, in all of them the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was the dominant sequence for peripheral zone (PZ) and T2-weighed imaging (T2WI) was the dominant sequence for transition zone (TZ). We also used the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version (PI-RADS) v2.1 to evaluate each lesion. For each scoring, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC). The calculated AUC for three bpMRI-based scorings were 83.2% (95% CI 78.8%–87.6%), 85.0% (95% CI 80.8%–89.3%), 82.9% (95% CI 78.4%–87.5%), and 86.0% (95% CI 81.8%–90.1%), respectively. Scoring 2 exhibited significantly superior performance than scoring 1 ( = 0.01) and scoring 3 ( < 0.001). Moreover, the accuracy of scoring 2 was not decreased significantly as compared to PI-RADS v2.1 ( = 0.05). There was no significant difference between 3 bpMRI-based scorings and with PI-RADS in TZ. However, although scoring 2 yielded the highest AUC, it was still notably inferior to PI-RADS ( = 0.02). All three bpMRI-based scorings demonstrated favorite diagnostic accuracy, and scoring 2 performed significantly better than the other two bpMRI-based scorings. Notably, scoring 2 was not significantly inferior to the full-sequence PI-RADS v2.1 in terms of sensitivity and specificity.
在这项研究中,我们旨在验证和比较三种基于双参数磁共振成像(bpMRI)的评分系统,用于检测活检无效患者中具有临床意义的前列腺癌(csPCa)。在这项研究中,我们纳入了在2018年1月至2022年12月期间接受磁共振成像检查的患者,并以磁共振成像靶向融合活检(MRGB)作为参考标准。核磁共振成像结果采用基于bpMRI的三种评分方法进行分类,其中扩散加权成像(DWI)是外周区(PZ)的主要序列,T2加权成像(T2WI)是过渡区(TZ)的主要序列。我们还使用前列腺成像报告和数据系统版本(PI-RADS)v2.1 对每个病灶进行评估。我们计算了每种评分的敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值(NPV)、阳性预测值(PPV)和接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)。计算得出的基于 bpMRI 的三种评分的 AUC 分别为 83.2%(95% CI 78.8%-87.6%)、85.0%(95% CI 80.8%-89.3%)、82.9%(95% CI 78.4%-87.5%)和 86.0%(95% CI 81.8%-90.1%)。评分 2 的表现明显优于评分 1 ( = 0.01) 和评分 3 ( < 0.001)。此外,与 PI-RADS v2.1 相比,评分 2 的准确性也没有明显下降(= 0.05)。基于 bpMRI 的 3 种评分与 PI-RADS 在 TZ 方面没有明显差异。不过,虽然评分 2 的 AUC 最高,但仍明显低于 PI-RADS(= 0.02)。所有三种基于 bpMRI 的评分都显示出最理想的诊断准确性,而评分 2 的表现明显优于其他两种基于 bpMRI 的评分。值得注意的是,就敏感性和特异性而言,评分 2 并不比全序列 PI-RADS v2.1 差。
{"title":"Comparisons of three scoring systems based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer","authors":"Wei Li, Haibing Xu, Wenwen Shang, Guohui Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2024.08.002","url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we aimed to validate and compare three scoring systems based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in biopsy-naïve patients. In this study, we included patients who underwent MRI examinations between January 2018 and December 2022, with MRI-targeted fusion biopsy (MRGB) as the reference standard. The MRI findings were categorized using three bpMRI-based scorings, in all of them the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was the dominant sequence for peripheral zone (PZ) and T2-weighed imaging (T2WI) was the dominant sequence for transition zone (TZ). We also used the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version (PI-RADS) v2.1 to evaluate each lesion. For each scoring, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC). The calculated AUC for three bpMRI-based scorings were 83.2% (95% CI 78.8%–87.6%), 85.0% (95% CI 80.8%–89.3%), 82.9% (95% CI 78.4%–87.5%), and 86.0% (95% CI 81.8%–90.1%), respectively. Scoring 2 exhibited significantly superior performance than scoring 1 ( = 0.01) and scoring 3 ( < 0.001). Moreover, the accuracy of scoring 2 was not decreased significantly as compared to PI-RADS v2.1 ( = 0.05). There was no significant difference between 3 bpMRI-based scorings and with PI-RADS in TZ. However, although scoring 2 yielded the highest AUC, it was still notably inferior to PI-RADS ( = 0.02). All three bpMRI-based scorings demonstrated favorite diagnostic accuracy, and scoring 2 performed significantly better than the other two bpMRI-based scorings. Notably, scoring 2 was not significantly inferior to the full-sequence PI-RADS v2.1 in terms of sensitivity and specificity.","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142189100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The association between behavioral habits and physical health status in prostate cancer patients: a large US national health-related survey 前列腺癌患者的行为习惯与身体健康状况之间的关系:一项大型美国全国健康相关调查
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.08.001
Chang-Rong Chen, Logan Briggs, Mara Koelker, Benjamin V. Stone, Khalid Alkhatib, Muhieddine Labban, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi, Giorgio Gandaglia, Quoc-Dien Trinh
The impact of behavioral habits such as exercise on the physical health of prostate cancer (PCa) patients is poorly understood. We aimed to investigate PCa patients' exercise habits and the association between exercise and self-reported physical health status. The 2016–2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) databases were used to identify men with a history of PCa. We identified patients with self-reported PCa diagnosis and excluded the non-male gender respondents in the self-reported PCa patients. We performed descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression analysis examining the association between exercise and poor physical health status. Our exposure of interest was the amount of physical exercise, and primary outcome was poor physical health status, defined as >14 self-reported days per month when patients felt “physical health is not good.” Covariates included age, body mass index (BMI), income, treatment, smoking, and exercise frequency. From 2,193,981 weighted survey participants, we identified 3,952 men with a history of PCa. Of these, 75% of participants reported exercise within the last month. In adjusted analyses among men with a history of PCa, exercise (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.40–0.64, < 0.001) was associated with lower odds of poor physical health status. Other independent predictors of poor physical health included income (High: OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18–0.41, < 0.01), BMI (underweight: OR 3.78, 95% CI 1.38–10.37, = 0.01), treatment status (Active: OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.05–2.94, = 0.03), smoking status (Active: OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.13–2.38, = 0.01). Our BRFSS cross-sectional study concluded that exercise among men with a history of PCa, even once per month, is associated with decreased odds of self-reported poor physical health; therefore, exercise programs should be considered for sedentary PCa patients.
人们对锻炼等行为习惯对前列腺癌(PCa)患者身体健康的影响知之甚少。我们旨在调查 PCa 患者的运动习惯以及运动与自我报告的身体健康状况之间的关联。我们使用 2016-2020 年行为危险因素监测系统(BRFSS)数据库来识别有 PCa 病史的男性。我们确定了自我报告的 PCa 诊断患者,并排除了自我报告的 PCa 患者中的非男性性别受访者。我们对运动与不良身体健康状况之间的关系进行了描述性统计和多变量逻辑回归分析。我们所关注的暴露因素是运动量,主要结果是身体健康状况差,即患者自述每月感觉 "身体健康状况不佳 "的天数大于 14 天。协变量包括年龄、体重指数(BMI)、收入、治疗、吸烟和运动频率。从 2,193,981 名加权调查参与者中,我们发现了 3,952 名有 PCa 病史的男性。其中,75% 的参与者表示在最近一个月内进行过锻炼。在对有 PCa 病史的男性进行的调整分析中,运动(OR 0.50,95% CI 0.40-0.64,< 0.001)与身体健康状况较差的几率较低有关。身体健康状况差的其他独立预测因素包括收入(高:OR 0.27,95% CI 0.18-0.41,<0.01)、体重指数(体重不足:OR 3.78,95% CI 1.38-10.37,=0.01)、治疗状态(活跃:OR 1.76,95% CI 1.05-2.94,=0.03)、吸烟状态(活跃:OR 1.64,95% CI 1.13-2.38,=0.01)。我们的BRFSS横断面研究得出结论:有PCa病史的男性即使每月锻炼一次,也会降低自我报告的身体健康状况不良的几率;因此,久坐不动的PCa患者应考虑参加锻炼计划。
{"title":"The association between behavioral habits and physical health status in prostate cancer patients: a large US national health-related survey","authors":"Chang-Rong Chen, Logan Briggs, Mara Koelker, Benjamin V. Stone, Khalid Alkhatib, Muhieddine Labban, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi, Giorgio Gandaglia, Quoc-Dien Trinh","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2024.08.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2024.08.001","url":null,"abstract":"The impact of behavioral habits such as exercise on the physical health of prostate cancer (PCa) patients is poorly understood. We aimed to investigate PCa patients' exercise habits and the association between exercise and self-reported physical health status. The 2016–2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) databases were used to identify men with a history of PCa. We identified patients with self-reported PCa diagnosis and excluded the non-male gender respondents in the self-reported PCa patients. We performed descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression analysis examining the association between exercise and poor physical health status. Our exposure of interest was the amount of physical exercise, and primary outcome was poor physical health status, defined as >14 self-reported days per month when patients felt “physical health is not good.” Covariates included age, body mass index (BMI), income, treatment, smoking, and exercise frequency. From 2,193,981 weighted survey participants, we identified 3,952 men with a history of PCa. Of these, 75% of participants reported exercise within the last month. In adjusted analyses among men with a history of PCa, exercise (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.40–0.64, < 0.001) was associated with lower odds of poor physical health status. Other independent predictors of poor physical health included income (High: OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18–0.41, < 0.01), BMI (underweight: OR 3.78, 95% CI 1.38–10.37, = 0.01), treatment status (Active: OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.05–2.94, = 0.03), smoking status (Active: OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.13–2.38, = 0.01). Our BRFSS cross-sectional study concluded that exercise among men with a history of PCa, even once per month, is associated with decreased odds of self-reported poor physical health; therefore, exercise programs should be considered for sedentary PCa patients.","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142189065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cardiovascular risks of Asian patients on androgen-receptor-targeted agents for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis 使用雄激素受体靶向药物治疗前列腺癌的亚洲患者的心血管风险:系统回顾和荟萃分析
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.07.004
Lin Kyaw, Qi Y. Lim, Yu X.T. Law, Chloe S.H. Ong, Wei T. Loke, Edmund Chiong, Ho Y. Tiong
Prostate cancer is now one of the most prevalent cancers in men in Asia. As the average life expectancy of Asian males with prostate cancer increases with the availability of treatment options, the possible risk of cardiac-related adverse effects arising from androgen-receptor-targeted agents (ARTAs) may be increased due to the greater exposure. We aim to perform a meta-analysis on the incidence of cardiac-related adverse events in Asian patients with prostate cancer treated with ARTAs. Databases were thoroughly searched for relevant articles. The Patient Intervention Comparison Outcome Study type model was used to frame our clinical question, and 2 independent authors went through several rounds of screening to select the final included studies. A meta-analysis was conducted using the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel method. Quality assessment was carried out with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool RoB 2. Seven randomized controlled trials were included for the final meta-analysis. Use of ARTA in Asian men did not show any significant increase in the total number of cardiac-related adverse events (risk ratio [RR]: 1.66 [0.84–3.26], p = 0.14). However, there was increase in incidence of hypertension (RR: 2.30 [1.41–3.73], p = 0.0008) and hypertension crises (RR: 16.87 [2.13–133.34], p = 0.007). A subgroup analysis of the type of ARTA used showed enzalutamide having the highest risk of hypertension (RR: 5.86 [2.10–16.38], p = 0.0008). :Although ARTAs did not show any significant increase in incidence of cardiac-related adverse events, there is an increased risk of hypertension especially with the use of enzalutamide. With this knowledge, closer blood pressure monitoring is needed for patients started on ARTA, especially enzalutamide.
前列腺癌是目前亚洲男性发病率最高的癌症之一。随着亚洲男性前列腺癌患者平均寿命的延长,治疗方法的增多,雄激素受体靶向药物(ARTAs)可能引起心脏相关不良反应的风险也会随之增加。我们旨在对接受 ARTAs 治疗的亚洲前列腺癌患者心脏相关不良事件的发生率进行荟萃分析。我们在数据库中彻底搜索了相关文章。两位独立作者经过多轮筛选,选出了最终纳入的研究。采用 Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel 方法进行了荟萃分析。最终的荟萃分析纳入了 7 项随机对照试验。在亚洲男性中使用 ARTA 并未显示心脏相关不良事件的总数有任何显著增加(风险比 [RR]:1.66 [0.84-3.26],P = 0.14)。然而,高血压(RR:2.30 [1.41-3.73],P = 0.0008)和高血压危象(RR:16.87 [2.13-133.34],P = 0.007)的发生率有所增加。对所用 ARTA 类型进行的亚组分析显示,恩杂鲁胺的高血压风险最高(RR:5.86 [2.10-16.38],p = 0.0008)。虽然ARTA在心脏相关不良事件的发生率方面没有明显增加,但高血压的风险会增加,尤其是使用恩杂鲁胺时。有鉴于此,开始使用ARTA(尤其是恩扎鲁胺)的患者需要更密切地监测血压。
{"title":"Cardiovascular risks of Asian patients on androgen-receptor-targeted agents for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Lin Kyaw, Qi Y. Lim, Yu X.T. Law, Chloe S.H. Ong, Wei T. Loke, Edmund Chiong, Ho Y. Tiong","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2024.07.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2024.07.004","url":null,"abstract":"Prostate cancer is now one of the most prevalent cancers in men in Asia. As the average life expectancy of Asian males with prostate cancer increases with the availability of treatment options, the possible risk of cardiac-related adverse effects arising from androgen-receptor-targeted agents (ARTAs) may be increased due to the greater exposure. We aim to perform a meta-analysis on the incidence of cardiac-related adverse events in Asian patients with prostate cancer treated with ARTAs. Databases were thoroughly searched for relevant articles. The Patient Intervention Comparison Outcome Study type model was used to frame our clinical question, and 2 independent authors went through several rounds of screening to select the final included studies. A meta-analysis was conducted using the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel method. Quality assessment was carried out with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool RoB 2. Seven randomized controlled trials were included for the final meta-analysis. Use of ARTA in Asian men did not show any significant increase in the total number of cardiac-related adverse events (risk ratio [RR]: 1.66 [0.84–3.26], p = 0.14). However, there was increase in incidence of hypertension (RR: 2.30 [1.41–3.73], p = 0.0008) and hypertension crises (RR: 16.87 [2.13–133.34], p = 0.007). A subgroup analysis of the type of ARTA used showed enzalutamide having the highest risk of hypertension (RR: 5.86 [2.10–16.38], p = 0.0008). :Although ARTAs did not show any significant increase in incidence of cardiac-related adverse events, there is an increased risk of hypertension especially with the use of enzalutamide. With this knowledge, closer blood pressure monitoring is needed for patients started on ARTA, especially enzalutamide.","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142189099","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association between preradiation therapy prostate-specific antigen levels and radiation therapy failure after prostatectomy: a propensity score matched analysis 放疗前 PSA 水平与前列腺切除术后放疗失败之间的关系:倾向得分匹配分析
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.03.001
Younsoo Chung , Sang Hun Song , Hakmin Lee , Jong Ho Park , Sung Kyu Hong

Purpose

We sought to determine the association between the pre-radiation therapy prostate-specific antigen (pre-RT PSA) 0.5 and RT failure in post-radical prostatectomy (post-RP) patients. Our study also investigated the prognostic factors for the failure of RT given concurrently with hormone therapy (HT) after RP.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed our institutional RP data from July 2004 to November 2021. Patients without concurrent hormone therapy were excluded. Propensity score matching was performed. Kaplan–Meier (KM) curve analysis was employed for RT failure-free survival, overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Cox regression analysis was used for the RT failure hazard ratio (HR).

Results

After propensity score matching, 193 patients were assigned to the pre-RT PSA ≥0.5 (high-P) arm, and 193 patients were assigned to the pre-RT PSA <0.5 (low-P) arm. There were no significant differences between the two arms after propensity score matching in terms of baseline characteristics and pathologic outcomes. High-P was associated with RT failure-free survival (P = 0.004), OS (P = 0.046), and CSS (P = 0.027). In a multi-variable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, seminal vesicle invasion, lymph node invasion, the absence of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), and high-P were identified as significant risk factors for RT failure.

Conclusion

High-P was significantly unfavorable with RT failure-free survival, OS, and CSS in patients who underwent RT after radical prostatectomy with concurrent HT. Seminal vesicle invasion, lymph node invasion, and the absence of PIN were identified as significant prognostic factors for RT failure.

我们试图确定放疗前前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)0.5与前列腺根治术(RP)后患者放疗失败之间的关系。我们的研究还调查了前列腺根治术(RP)后同时进行 HT 的 RT 治疗失败的预后因素。我们回顾性地查看了2004年7月至2021年11月期间本机构的RP数据。排除了未同时接受激素治疗的患者。进行倾向评分匹配。对无RT失败生存率、总生存率(OS)和癌症特异性生存率(CSS)采用Kaplan-Meier(KM)曲线分析。对 RT 失败危险比(HR)采用了 Cox 回归分析。经过倾向评分匹配后,193 名患者被分配到 RT 前 PSA ≥ 0.5(高 - P)组,193 名患者被分配到 RT 前 PSA < 0.5(低 - P)组。在对基线特征和病理结果进行倾向评分匹配后,两组之间没有明显差异。高P与RT无失败生存率(= 0.004)、OS(= 0.046)和CSS(= 0.027)相关。在多变量 Cox 比例危险回归分析中,精囊侵犯、淋巴结侵犯、无 PIN 和高 P 被确定为 RT 失败的重要风险因素。在根治性前列腺切除术并同时进行高温治疗的患者中,高P明显不利于无RT失败生存率、OS和CSS。精囊侵犯、淋巴结侵犯和无PIN被认为是RT失败的重要预后因素。
{"title":"Association between preradiation therapy prostate-specific antigen levels and radiation therapy failure after prostatectomy: a propensity score matched analysis","authors":"Younsoo Chung ,&nbsp;Sang Hun Song ,&nbsp;Hakmin Lee ,&nbsp;Jong Ho Park ,&nbsp;Sung Kyu Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2024.03.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prnil.2024.03.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>We sought to determine the association between the pre-radiation therapy prostate-specific antigen (pre-RT PSA) 0.5 and RT failure in post-radical prostatectomy (post-RP) patients. Our study also investigated the prognostic factors for the failure of RT given concurrently with hormone therapy (HT) after RP.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed our institutional RP data from July 2004 to November 2021. Patients without concurrent hormone therapy were excluded. Propensity score matching was performed. Kaplan–Meier (KM) curve analysis was employed for RT failure-free survival, overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Cox regression analysis was used for the RT failure hazard ratio (HR).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After propensity score matching, 193 patients were assigned to the pre-RT PSA ≥0.5 (high-P) arm, and 193 patients were assigned to the pre-RT PSA &lt;0.5 (low-P) arm. There were no significant differences between the two arms after propensity score matching in terms of baseline characteristics and pathologic outcomes. High-P was associated with RT failure-free survival (<em>P</em> = 0.004), OS (<em>P</em> = 0.046), and CSS (<em>P</em> = 0.027). In a multi-variable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, seminal vesicle invasion, lymph node invasion, the absence of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), and high-P were identified as significant risk factors for RT failure.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>High-P was significantly unfavorable with RT failure-free survival, OS, and CSS in patients who underwent RT after radical prostatectomy with concurrent HT. Seminal vesicle invasion, lymph node invasion, and the absence of PIN were identified as significant prognostic factors for RT failure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888224000059/pdfft?md5=1a328ae2b6adac464828d10be09cd55b&pid=1-s2.0-S2287888224000059-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140127234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of obesity and sexual behavior on prostate cancer risk is mediated by testosterone levels: a mendelian randomization study and mediation analysis 肥胖和性行为对前列腺癌风险的影响由睾酮水平介导:孟德尔随机化研究与中介分析
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.03.003
Huajie Di , Yi Wen , Junyan Wang , Jiayu Wang , Yeqing Wang , Yuan Li , Fanghao Sun

Background

The relationship between obesity, sexual behavior, and prostate cancer (PCa) has been widely debated, contributing to a lack of understanding of its potential mechanisms and hindering the development of effective prevention measures.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to examine the causal effect of body mass index (BMI), age at first sexual intercourse (AFS), and bioavailable testosterone levels on PCa while also quantifying the potential roles of mediators.

Method

We conducted a Mendelian randomization (MR) study using summary statistics from genome-wide associations of BMI (152,893 European males), AFS (182,791 European males), bioavailable testosterone (184,205 European males), and PCa (79,148 cases, 61,106 controls, European ancestry). Inverse-variance weighted method, weighted median method, MR-Egger regression, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), and outlier test were used for MR analyses. Reverse MR and mediation analysis were performed. Data analyses were conducted from December 2022 to July 2023.

Results

The results showed that genetic liability to BMI was protective of PCa (OR, 0.82; 95% CI: 0.74-0.91; P = 3.29 × 10−4). Genetic liability to later AFS (OR, 1.28; 95% CI: 1.08-1.53; P = 5.64 × 10−3) and higher bioavailable testosterone levels (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01–1.24, P = 0.04) were associated with an increased risk of PCa. All of these potential causal effects could only be forwarded and were not affected by prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening. After controlling for bioavailable testosterone levels, the causal impact of BMI and AFS on PCa was no longer significant. The mediation analysis suggested that the causal influence of AFS/BMI on PCa relied on bioavailable testosterone levels.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the difference between the univariable and multivariable MR results suggested that the causal influence of BMI and AFS on PCa relied on bioavailable testosterone levels. Further work is needed to identify other risk factors and to elucidate the specific mechanisms that underlie this causal pathway.

背景肥胖、性行为和前列腺癌(PCa)之间的关系一直存在广泛争议,这导致人们对其潜在机制缺乏了解,并阻碍了有效预防措施的开发。目的本研究旨在探讨体重指数(BMI)、首次性交年龄(AFS)和生物可用睾酮水平对PCa的因果效应,同时量化中介因素的潜在作用。方法我们利用体重指数(152,893 名欧洲男性)、首次性交年龄(182,791 名欧洲男性)、生物可用睾酮(184,205 名欧洲男性)和 PCa(79,148 例病例,61,106 例对照,欧洲血统)全基因组关联的汇总统计数据,开展了一项孟德尔随机化(MR)研究。MR分析采用了逆方差加权法、加权中值法、MR-Egger回归法、最小绝对缩减和选择操作器(LASSO)以及离群值检验。进行了反向 MR 分析和中介分析。结果显示,BMI 的遗传易感性对 PCa 具有保护作用(OR,0.82;95% CI:0.74-0.91;P = 3.29 × 10-4)。晚期 AFS 的遗传责任(OR,1.28;95% CI:1.08-1.53;P = 5.64 × 10-3)和较高的生物可利用睾酮水平(OR = 1.11,95% CI:1.01-1.24,P = 0.04)与 PCa 风险增加有关。所有这些潜在的因果效应只能向前推移,不受前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查的影响。在控制了生物可用睾酮水平后,BMI 和 AFS 对 PCa 的因果影响不再显著。结论总之,单变量和多变量 MR 结果之间的差异表明,BMI 和 AFS 对 PCa 的因果影响取决于生物可用睾酮水平。需要进一步开展工作,以确定其他风险因素,并阐明这一因果关系的具体机制。
{"title":"The impact of obesity and sexual behavior on prostate cancer risk is mediated by testosterone levels: a mendelian randomization study and mediation analysis","authors":"Huajie Di ,&nbsp;Yi Wen ,&nbsp;Junyan Wang ,&nbsp;Jiayu Wang ,&nbsp;Yeqing Wang ,&nbsp;Yuan Li ,&nbsp;Fanghao Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2024.03.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prnil.2024.03.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The relationship between obesity, sexual behavior, and prostate cancer (PCa) has been widely debated, contributing to a lack of understanding of its potential mechanisms and hindering the development of effective prevention measures.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The aim of this study was to examine the causal effect of body mass index (BMI), age at first sexual intercourse (AFS), and bioavailable testosterone levels on PCa while also quantifying the potential roles of mediators.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We conducted a Mendelian randomization (MR) study using summary statistics from genome-wide associations of BMI (152,893 European males), AFS (182,791 European males), bioavailable testosterone (184,205 European males), and PCa (79,148 cases, 61,106 controls, European ancestry). Inverse-variance weighted method, weighted median method, MR-Egger regression, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), and outlier test were used for MR analyses. Reverse MR and mediation analysis were performed. Data analyses were conducted from December 2022 to July 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results showed that genetic liability to BMI was protective of PCa (OR, 0.82; 95% CI: 0.74-0.91; <em>P</em> = 3.29 × 10<sup>−4</sup>). Genetic liability to later AFS (OR, 1.28; 95% CI: 1.08-1.53; <em>P</em> = 5.64 × 10<sup>−3</sup>) and higher bioavailable testosterone levels (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01–1.24, <em>P</em> = 0.04) were associated with an increased risk of PCa. All of these potential causal effects could only be forwarded and were not affected by prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening. After controlling for bioavailable testosterone levels, the causal impact of BMI and AFS on PCa was no longer significant. The mediation analysis suggested that the causal influence of AFS/BMI on PCa relied on bioavailable testosterone levels.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In conclusion, the difference between the univariable and multivariable MR results suggested that the causal influence of BMI and AFS on PCa relied on bioavailable testosterone levels. Further work is needed to identify other risk factors and to elucidate the specific mechanisms that underlie this causal pathway.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888224000230/pdfft?md5=ff5b57541bc01564214d012434eb8ab7&pid=1-s2.0-S2287888224000230-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140399036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Application of robotics in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a narrative review 机器人技术在良性前列腺增生治疗中的应用:综述
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.06.002
Hyung Joon Kim, Sung Kyu Hong
{"title":"Application of robotics in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a narrative review","authors":"Hyung Joon Kim, Sung Kyu Hong","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2024.06.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2024.06.002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141413657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Propensity score matched analysis of functional outcome in five thousand cases of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus high-intensity focused ultrasound 5000 例机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术与高强度聚焦超声的功能结果倾向得分匹配分析
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.03.004
Junhyun Nam , Jung Kwon Kim , Jong Jin Oh , Sangchul Lee , Seok-Soo Byun , Sung Kyu Hong , Sang Hun Song

Background

To evaluate functional outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation for prostate cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 4,983 RARP and 230 HIFU procedures performed at a single tertiary center. A 1:4 ratio propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to achieve baseline equivalence in age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, clinical stage, prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, biopsy grade, and number of positive cores. Functional outcomes based on International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) scores, and incontinence rates were evaluated at 6, 12, and 24 months.

Results

total of 193 HIFU cases matched to 760 cases of RARP, were included. No differences were observed in perioperative IPSS at all follow-up periods. Despite comparative erectile function at baseline, HIFU showed significantly better erectile function preservation compared to RARP, with mean IIEF-5 scores of 9.5 versus 4.8, 9.5 versus 5.8, and 8.4 versus 6.7 at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively (all P < 0.001). Pad-free rates at 6 and 12 months were comparable, with over 96% achieving continence at 12 months in both groups, although the rate of ≤1 pad/day at last follow-up was slightly better in HIFU (98.9% vs. 96.7%, P = 0.049). Subgroup analysis on partial (PGA) and whole gland ablation (WGA) showed no differences in IIEF-5 and incontinence but increased voiding difficulty in WGA versus PGA after 12 months of therapy (P < 0.05). Preoperative IIEF-5 ≥17 and HIFU were significant predictors of early erectile function recovery at 6 months (HR 4.4 and 5.0; all P < 0.001). No differences were observed in treatment-free survival between PGA, WGA, and RARP.

Conclusion

HIFU shows better performance in early recovery and preservation of erectile function after treatment for prostate cancer without increasing the risk of treatment failure. Patients with moderate to severe erectile dysfunction (IIEF-5 <17) prior to surgery should be warned of poor recovery after treatment.

背景为了评估机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术(RARP)和高强度聚焦超声消融术(HIFU)治疗前列腺癌后的功能预后,我们回顾性研究了在一家三级医疗中心进行的4983例RARP和230例HIFU手术。为了在年龄、体重指数(BMI)、合并症、临床分期、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、前列腺体积、活检等级和阳性核芯数量方面达到基线等效,我们进行了1:4比例倾向得分匹配(PSM)。根据国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、国际勃起功能指数(IIEF-5)评分和尿失禁率,在6个月、12个月和24个月时对功能结果进行评估。在所有随访期间均未观察到围术期 IPSS 的差异。尽管基线时勃起功能相当,但与 RARP 相比,HIFU 的勃起功能保存效果明显更好,6、12 和 24 个月时的 IIEF-5 平均得分分别为 9.5 分对 4.8 分、9.5 分对 5.8 分和 8.4 分对 6.7 分(所有 P 均为 0.001)。6个月和12个月的无尿垫率相当,两组均有96%以上的患者在12个月时实现了尿失禁,但HIFU患者在最后一次随访时尿垫≤1片/天的比率略高(98.9%对96.7%,P = 0.049)。对部分腺体消融术(PGA)和全腺体消融术(WGA)进行的亚组分析表明,治疗 12 个月后,IIEF-5 和尿失禁率没有差异,但 WGA 与 PGA 相比,排尿困难率增加(P < 0.05)。术前 IIEF-5 ≥17 和 HIFU 是 6 个月时勃起功能早期恢复的重要预测因素(HR 4.4 和 5.0;均为 P < 0.001)。结论HIFU在前列腺癌治疗后早期恢复和保护勃起功能方面表现更佳,且不会增加治疗失败的风险。手术前有中度至重度勃起功能障碍(IIEF-5 <17)的患者应警惕治疗后恢复不良。
{"title":"Propensity score matched analysis of functional outcome in five thousand cases of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus high-intensity focused ultrasound","authors":"Junhyun Nam ,&nbsp;Jung Kwon Kim ,&nbsp;Jong Jin Oh ,&nbsp;Sangchul Lee ,&nbsp;Seok-Soo Byun ,&nbsp;Sung Kyu Hong ,&nbsp;Sang Hun Song","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2024.03.004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prnil.2024.03.004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To evaluate functional outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation for prostate cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed 4,983 RARP and 230 HIFU procedures performed at a single tertiary center. A 1:4 ratio propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to achieve baseline equivalence in age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, clinical stage, prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, biopsy grade, and number of positive cores. Functional outcomes based on International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) scores, and incontinence rates were evaluated at 6, 12, and 24 months.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>total of 193 HIFU cases matched to 760 cases of RARP, were included. No differences were observed in perioperative IPSS at all follow-up periods. Despite comparative erectile function at baseline, HIFU showed significantly better erectile function preservation compared to RARP, with mean IIEF-5 scores of 9.5 versus 4.8, 9.5 versus 5.8, and 8.4 versus 6.7 at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively (all <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Pad-free rates at 6 and 12 months were comparable, with over 96% achieving continence at 12 months in both groups, although the rate of ≤1 pad/day at last follow-up was slightly better in HIFU (98.9% vs. 96.7%, <em>P</em> = 0.049). Subgroup analysis on partial (PGA) and whole gland ablation (WGA) showed no differences in IIEF-5 and incontinence but increased voiding difficulty in WGA versus PGA after 12 months of therapy (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Preoperative IIEF-5 ≥17 and HIFU were significant predictors of early erectile function recovery at 6 months (HR 4.4 and 5.0; all <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). No differences were observed in treatment-free survival between PGA, WGA, and RARP.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>HIFU shows better performance in early recovery and preservation of erectile function after treatment for prostate cancer without increasing the risk of treatment failure. Patients with moderate to severe erectile dysfunction (IIEF-5 &lt;17) prior to surgery should be warned of poor recovery after treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888224000242/pdfft?md5=f1637b0c9f5fa45b613b5aec5c2d86ba&pid=1-s2.0-S2287888224000242-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140407001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association between pelvic lymph node dissection and survival among patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy 盆腔淋巴结清扫与前列腺癌根治术患者生存率的关系
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.01.002
Isaac E. Kim Jr. , Aaron H. Wang , George S. Corpuz , Preston C. Sprenkle , Michael S. Leapman , Joseph M. Brito , Joseph Renzulli , Isaac Yi Kim

Introduction

Although the clinical benefits of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at the time of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer remain uncertain, major guidelines recommend PLND based on risk profile. Thus, the objective of this study was to examine the association between PLND and survival among patients undergoing RP stratified by Gleason grade group (GG) with the aim of allowing patients and physicians to make more informed care decisions about the potential risks and benefits of PLND.

Materials and methods

From the SEER-17 database, we examined overall (OS) and prostate cancer-specific (PCSS) survival of prostate cancer patients who underwent RP from 2010 to 2015 stratified by GG. We applied propensity score matching to balance pre-operative characteristics including race, age, PSA, household income, and housing status (urban/rural) between patients who did and did not undergo PLND for each GG. Statistical analyses included log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier curves.

Results

We extracted a matched cohort from 80,287 patients with GG1-5 who underwent RP. The median PSA value was 6.0 ng/mL, and the median age was 62-years-old. 49,453 patients underwent PLND (61.60%), while 30,834 (38.40%) did not. There was no difference in OS and PCSS between patients who received PLND and those who did not for all Gleason GG (OS–GG1: P = 0.20, GG2: P = 0.34, GG3: P > 0.05, GG4: P = 0.55, GG5: P = 0.47; PCSS–GG1: P = 0.11, GG2: P = 0.96, GG3: P = 0.81, GG4: P = 0.22, GG5: P = 0.14).

Conclusions

In this observational study, PLND at the time of RP was not associated with improved OS or PCSS among patients with cGS of 3 + 3, 3 + 4, 4 + 3, 4 + 4, 4 + 5, and 5 + 4. These findings suggest that until definitive clinical trials are completed, prostate cancer patients who have elected RP should be appropriately counseled on the potential risks and lack of proven survival benefit of PLND.

导言尽管前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术时进行盆腔淋巴结清扫(PLND)的临床益处仍不确定,但主要指南仍建议根据风险情况进行盆腔淋巴结清扫。因此,本研究的目的是研究按格里森分级组(GG)分层的前列腺癌根治术患者盆腔淋巴结清扫术与生存率之间的关系,以便患者和医生就盆腔淋巴结清扫术的潜在风险和益处做出更明智的治疗决策。材料与方法我们从SEER-17数据库中研究了2010年至2015年按GG分层的前列腺癌根治术患者的总生存率(OS)和前列腺癌特异性生存率(PCSS)。我们采用倾向得分匹配法来平衡每个GG中接受和未接受PLND的患者的术前特征,包括种族、年龄、PSA、家庭收入和住房状况(城市/农村)。统计分析包括对数秩检验和 Kaplan-Meier 曲线。PSA中位值为6.0纳克/毫升,中位年龄为62岁。49,453 名患者接受了 PLND(61.60%),30,834 名患者(38.40%)没有接受 PLND。在所有 Gleason GG 中,接受 PLND 和未接受 PLND 的患者在 OS 和 PCSS 方面均无差异(OS-GG1:P = 0.20,GG2:P=0.34,GG3:P> 0.05,GG4:P=0.55,GG5:P=0.47;PCSS-GG1:P=0.11,GG2:P=0.96,GG5:P=0.47:结论在这项观察性研究中,对于 cGS 为 3 + 3、3 + 4、4 + 3、4 + 4、4 + 5 和 5 + 4 的患者,RP 时的 PLND 与 OS 或 PCSS 的改善无关。这些研究结果表明,在明确的临床试验完成之前,应适当向选择 RP 的前列腺癌患者说明 PLND 的潜在风险和缺乏经证实的生存益处。
{"title":"Association between pelvic lymph node dissection and survival among patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy","authors":"Isaac E. Kim Jr. ,&nbsp;Aaron H. Wang ,&nbsp;George S. Corpuz ,&nbsp;Preston C. Sprenkle ,&nbsp;Michael S. Leapman ,&nbsp;Joseph M. Brito ,&nbsp;Joseph Renzulli ,&nbsp;Isaac Yi Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2024.01.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prnil.2024.01.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Although the clinical benefits of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at the time of radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer remain uncertain, major guidelines recommend PLND based on risk profile. Thus, the objective of this study was to examine the association between PLND and survival among patients undergoing RP stratified by Gleason grade group (GG) with the aim of allowing patients and physicians to make more informed care decisions about the potential risks and benefits of PLND.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>From the SEER-17 database, we examined overall (OS) and prostate cancer-specific (PCSS) survival of prostate cancer patients who underwent RP from 2010 to 2015 stratified by GG. We applied propensity score matching to balance pre-operative characteristics including race, age, PSA, household income, and housing status (urban/rural) between patients who did and did not undergo PLND for each GG. Statistical analyses included log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier curves.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We extracted a matched cohort from 80,287 patients with GG1-5 who underwent RP. The median PSA value was 6.0 ng/mL, and the median age was 62-years-old. 49,453 patients underwent PLND (61.60%), while 30,834 (38.40%) did not. There was no difference in OS and PCSS between patients who received PLND and those who did not for all Gleason GG (OS–GG1: <em>P</em> = 0.20, GG2: <em>P</em> = 0.34, GG3: <em>P</em> &gt; 0.05, GG4: <em>P</em> = 0.55, GG5: <em>P</em> = 0.47; PCSS–GG1: <em>P</em> = 0.11, GG2: <em>P</em> = 0.96, GG3: <em>P</em> = 0.81, GG4: <em>P</em> = 0.22, GG5: <em>P</em> = 0.14).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this observational study, PLND at the time of RP was not associated with improved OS or PCSS among patients with cGS of 3 + 3, 3 + 4, 4 + 3, 4 + 4, 4 + 5, and 5 + 4. These findings suggest that until definitive clinical trials are completed, prostate cancer patients who have elected RP should be appropriately counseled on the potential risks and lack of proven survival benefit of PLND.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888224000023/pdfft?md5=0ca840c0e08106ea2975754f1f3bfaba&pid=1-s2.0-S2287888224000023-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139828666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety and Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy on Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled study 体外冲击波疗法对慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征的安全性和有效性:前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.06.003
K. Hur, W. Bae, U-Syn Ha, S. Kim, Junjie Piao, Kyung-Hwa Jeon, Cheong Woon Cheon, Dae Up Kang, Jong Woong Lee, Dongho Shin, S. Kim
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy on Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled study","authors":"K. Hur, W. Bae, U-Syn Ha, S. Kim, Junjie Piao, Kyung-Hwa Jeon, Cheong Woon Cheon, Dae Up Kang, Jong Woong Lee, Dongho Shin, S. Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2024.06.003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141407358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The relationship between depression, anxiety and lower urinary tract symptoms in men 男性抑郁、焦虑与下尿路症状之间的关系
IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.02.002
Yu Seob Shin , Kiran Kumar Soni , Dong Yun Lee , Sung Chul Kam

Purpose

Patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) often experience comorbid depression and anxiety, yet the mechanisms underlying this association remain incompletely understood. This prospective study aimed to investigate the relationship between depression, anxiety, and LUTS in men.

Materials and methods

A prospective study was conducted with 350 male patients who underwent urologic examinations at our institution from January 2021 to December 2021. Of these, 131 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were included. Various questionnaires, including the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), as well as LUTS examinations (prostate-specific antigen test, transrectal ultrasonography, and urine flowmetry), were administered.

Results

Among the 350 patients, 131 were included in the analysis, with an average age of 58.0 ± 13.69 years. The total IPSS was 18.0 ± 8.69, with the average voiding symptom score at 8.7 ± 5.19 and the average storage symptom score at 6.0 ± 3.27. Both anxiety and depression were found to be correlated with LUTS (P < 0.05). After adjusting for age, hypertension, and diabetes, anxiety (but not depression) was significantly associated with LUTS based on regression analysis.

Conclusion

Men with LUTS are more likely to experience anxiety. Therefore, it is essential to assess and address anxiety when managing men with LUTS.

下尿路症状(LUTS)患者通常会合并抑郁和焦虑,但这种关联的内在机制仍不完全清楚。这项前瞻性研究旨在探讨男性抑郁、焦虑与下尿路症状之间的关系。本研究对 2021 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间在我院接受泌尿科检查的 350 名男性患者进行了前瞻性研究。其中,131 名患者符合纳入标准。研究人员进行了各种问卷调查,包括国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS),以及前列腺液排泄障碍检查(前列腺特异性抗原检测、经直肠超声检查和尿流测定)。在 350 名患者中,有 131 人被纳入分析,平均年龄为 58.0 ± 13.69 岁。IPSS 总分为(18.0 ± 8.69)分,排尿症状平均分为(8.7 ± 5.19)分,储尿症状平均分为(6.0 ± 3.27)分。焦虑和抑郁均与 LUTS 相关(P < 0.05)。在对年龄、高血压和糖尿病进行调整后,根据回归分析,焦虑(而非抑郁)与 LUTS 显著相关。患有 LUTS 的男性更有可能经历焦虑。因此,在对患有 LUTS 的男性进行治疗时,评估和解决焦虑问题至关重要。
{"title":"The relationship between depression, anxiety and lower urinary tract symptoms in men","authors":"Yu Seob Shin ,&nbsp;Kiran Kumar Soni ,&nbsp;Dong Yun Lee ,&nbsp;Sung Chul Kam","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2024.02.002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.prnil.2024.02.002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) often experience comorbid depression and anxiety, yet the mechanisms underlying this association remain incompletely understood. This prospective study aimed to investigate the relationship between depression, anxiety, and LUTS in men.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A prospective study was conducted with 350 male patients who underwent urologic examinations at our institution from January 2021 to December 2021. Of these, 131 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were included. Various questionnaires, including the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), as well as LUTS examinations (prostate-specific antigen test, transrectal ultrasonography, and urine flowmetry), were administered.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 350 patients, 131 were included in the analysis, with an average age of 58.0 ± 13.69 years. The total IPSS was 18.0 ± 8.69, with the average voiding symptom score at 8.7 ± 5.19 and the average storage symptom score at 6.0 ± 3.27. Both anxiety and depression were found to be correlated with LUTS (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). After adjusting for age, hypertension, and diabetes, anxiety (but not depression) was significantly associated with LUTS based on regression analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Men with LUTS are more likely to experience anxiety. Therefore, it is essential to assess and address anxiety when managing men with LUTS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888224000047/pdfft?md5=b0ad1e4c42a40a8a646787b57382c304&pid=1-s2.0-S2287888224000047-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140005439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Prostate International
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1