Prostate International最新文献

Objectives

To investigate the role of urine spermine and spermine risk score in predicting prostate cancer (PCa) diagnoses in combination with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI).

Methods

Three hundred forty seven consecutive men with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) with mpMRI examination were prospectively enrolled in this study. In 265 patients with PSA levels between 4 and20 ng/ml, pre-biopsy urine samples were analyzed for spermine levels with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UPLC-MS/MS). Transperineal image-guided prostate biopsies with 16-18 cores were performed. Logistic regressions were used to form different models for the prediction of the PCa, and the performances were compared using the area under the curve (AUC).

Results

The median serum PSA level and prostate volume were 7.4 ng/mL and 33.9 mL, respectively. PCa and high-grade PCa (ISUP group ≥2, HGPCa) were diagnosed in 66.0% (175/265) and 132/265 (49.8%) cases, respectively. The urine spermine levels were significantly lower in men with PCa (0.87 vs. 2.20, P < 0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that age, PSA, PV, urine spermine level, and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) findings were independent predictors for PCa. The Spermine Risk Score is a multivariable model including PSA, age, prostate volume, and urine spermine. Adding the Spermine Risk Score to PI-RADS improved the AUC from 0.73 to 0.86 in PCa and from 0.72 to 0.83 in high grade PCa (HGPCa) prediction (both P < 0.001). At 90% sensitivity for HGPCa prediction using Spermine Risk Score, 31.1% of unnecessary biopsies could be avoided. In men with equivocal MRI PI-RADS score 3, the AUC for HGPCa prediction was 0.58, 0.79, and 0.87 for PSA, PSA density, and Spermine Risk Score, respectively.

Conclusion

Urine Spermine Risk Score, including mpMRI could accurately identify men at high risk of HGPCa and reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies. Spermine Risk Score could more accurately predict HGPCa than PSA density in men with MRI showing equivocal PI-RADS 3 lesions.

Background

Multiple oral chemotherapeutic agents for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) have been developed for conjugated use with conventional androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) report significant benefits in mHSPC patients. Therefore, we compared overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) benefits among considerable mHSPC oral chemotherapeutic agents.

Materials and methods

We investigated mHSPC treatment efficacy through a systematic RCT-trial literature review (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus). Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed bias risk in duplicate.

Results

We identified 18 RCTs (n = 13,509). Concerning OS, ADT + abiraterone, ADT + abiraterone + docetaxel, ADT + apalutamide, ADT + bicalutamide, ADT + darolutamide + docetaxel, ADT + enzalutamide, ADT + orteronel, and ADT + rezvilutamide were more effective than the standard of care (SOC). Comparing PFS, most treatments were more effective than SOC, excluding ADT + bicalutamide, nilutamide, flutamide, ADT + bicalutamide + palbociclib, and ADT + nilutamide. ADT + docetaxel with androgen receptor targeted agent (ARTA) triplet therapy was not among the top three treatments determined through ranking analysis.

Conclusions

Novel oral chemotherapeutic agent combination therapies must replace current ADT monotherapy and ADT + docetaxel SOC. Even so, ADT + docetaxel with ARTA triplet therapy still is not the best mHSPC treatment and requires further study.

Background

We compared the clinical outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and partial gland ablation (PGA) using high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in localized prostate cancer.

Methods

We analyzed 3,859 patients who had undergone RARP and PGA using HIFU. According to the propensity score for each treatment, 137 patients after PGA were matched to 3,722 patients after RARP at a 1:4 ratio using the nearest neighbor method.

Results

The matched cohort comprised 685 subjects (RARP, 548; PGA, 137), with a median follow-up period of 22 months. Treatment failures were identified in 13.9% and 9.1% of patients in the PGA and RARP groups, respectively, after a median follow-up of 36 months postoperatively. Kaplan–Meier analyses revealed significantly longer failure-free (P < 0.001) and salvage-free survival (P = 0.003) in the RARP group than in the PGA group. There was no significant difference in the postoperative urinary symptom score (P = 0.748), but the postoperative erectile function score was significantly higher in the PGA group (P < 0.001). The rate of urinary incontinence (any pad) was significantly lower in the PGA group than that in the RARP group (P < 0.001). Postoperative complications were more frequent in the PGA group (P = 0.003); however, there was no significant difference in high-grade complications (≥3) (P = 0.467).

Conclusion

PGA using HIFU showed statistically inferior oncological outcomes compared with RARP for failure-free survival and salvage-free survival. However, functional outcomes regarding postoperative incontinence and erectile dysfunction were more favorable in the PGA group.

Around 40 years have passed since a modern low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy for prostate cancer was introduced. LDR brachytherapy has become one of the definitive treatment options besides radical prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). LDR brachytherapy has several advantages over EBRT such as a higher prescribed dose to the prostate gland while avoiding unnecessary irradiation of organs at risk, a precipitous dose gradient, a brief treatment time, and a short hospital stay. Previous reports revealed that the long-term oncologic outcomes of LDR brachytherapy are superior to those of EBRT. The oncologic outcomes of low- to intermediate-risk patients are equivalent to those of RP using the recurrence definition of surgery of prostate specific antigen (PSA) >0.2 ng/mL, while the oncologic outcomes of LDR brachytherapy as tri-modality (combined EBRT and androgen deprivation therapy) for high-risk patients is superior to that of RP using the recurrence definition of surgery. In respect of toxicity, urinary disorders such as urgency and frequency are often observed after the acute phase of treatment, but these events usually resolve, while the quality of life of urinary continence is well preserved for a long time. Erectile function decreases yearly, but is relatively preserved compared to RP. In conclusion, the most noteworthy strength of LDR brachytherapy for low- to intermediate-risk patients is the “brief treatment time” that provides long recurrence-free survival, while that for high-risk patients who received LDR brachytherapy (tri-modality) is “excellent disease control.”

Background

We assessed the ability of the combination of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy (TTMB) to determine the eligibility for focal therapy (FT) (hemiablation) in men and compared it with that of histology from radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens.

Materials and methods

In this study, 120 men who underwent mpMRI, TTMB, and RP in a single tertiary center from May 2017 to June 2021 were analyzed. The criteria of hemiablation eligibility were unilateral low-to intermediate-risk prostate cancer (limited to a maximum of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group 3 and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <20 ng/mL) and clinical stage ≤T2. Evidence of non-organ-confined disease or contralateral Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2 score ≥4 on mpMRI was classified as ineligible for hemiablation. Clinically significant cancer at RP was defined as any of the following: (1) ISUP grade group 1 with tumor volume ≥1.3 mL; (2) ISUP grade group ≥2; or (3) the presence of advanced stage (≥pT3).

Results

Of the 120 men, data of 52 men who met the selection criteria for hemiablation were compared with final RP findings. Of these 52 men, 42 (80.7%) could be considered suitable for hemiablation on RP. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of mpMRI and TTMB in predicting FT eligibility were 80.7%, 85.1%, and 82.5%, respectively. The rate of undetected contralateral significant cancer was 10 (19.2%) on mpMRI and TTMB. Six had bilateral significant cancer and four had small volumes of ISUP grade group ≥2.

Conclusions

The combination of mpMRI and TTMB substantially improves the prediction of potential candidates for hemiablation based on consensus recommendations. Improved selection criteria and further investigative tools are required to improve patient selection for hemiablation.

Background

Metformin and phenformin, biguanide derivatives that are widely used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus, have recently been shown to exert potential anticancer effects in prostate cancer. This study compared the antiprostate cancer effects of the novel biguanide derivative IM176 with those of metformin and phenformin.

Methods

Prostate cancer cell lines and patient-derived castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) cells were treated with IMI76, metformin, and phenformin. The effects of these agents on cell viability, annexin V-FITC apoptosis, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition, protein expression and phosphorylation, and gene expression were evaluated.

Results

IM176 dose dependently reduced the viability of all prostate cancer cell lines tested, with IC₅₀s (LNCaP: 18.5 μM; 22Rv1: 36.8 μM) lower than those of metformin and phenformin. IM176 activated AMP-activated protein kinase, inhibiting mammalian target of rapamycin and reducing the phosphorylation of p70S6K1 and S6. IM176 inhibited the expression of androgen receptor, the androgen receptor splice variant 7, and prostate-specific antigen in LNCaP and 22Rv1 cells. IM176 increased caspase-3 cleavage and annexin V-positive/propidium iodide–positive cells, which indicated apoptosis. Moreover, IM176 reduced viability, with low IC₅₀, in cultured cells derived from two patients with CRPC.

Conclusion

The antitumor effects of IM176 were comparable with those of other biguanides. IM176 may therefore be a novel candidate for the treatment of patients with prostate cancer, including those with CRPC.

Background

The number of core biopsies required per region of interest (ROI) is controversial, as is the localization of the core to be taken from a lesion. This study aimed to determine the ideal biopsy core number and location in a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided targeted prostate biopsy (TPB), without reducing the clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC) detection rate.

Materials and methods

Data of patients who had PI-RADS ≥3 lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and underwent a TPB in our clinic between October 2020 and January 2022 were reviewed, retrospectively. The first and second cores were taken from the central part of the ROI, whereas the third and fourth cores were taken from the right and left peripheries of the ROI. We compared the csPC detection success of single-, 2-, 3-, and 4-core samplings.

Results

Software-based transrectal TPB was performed on 251 ROIs in a total of 167 patients. Internal Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group ≥2 cancer was detected in at least one core in 64 (25.4%) lesions. Moreover, csPC was detected in 42 (65.6%) ROIs in first-core biopsies; in 59 (92.2%) ROIs in first- and second-core biopsies; in 62 (96.9%) ROIs in first-, second-, and third-core biopsies; and in 64 (100%) ROIs in first-, second-, third-, and fourth-core biopsies. Using McNemar's test for comparison, a significant difference was found in terms of csPC detection success between performing first-core and second-core biopsies (65.6 – 92.2%, p < 0.001); by contrast, no significant difference was observed in csPC detection success between 2-core and 3-core biopsies (92.2% - 96.9%, p = 0.24). Furthermore, no significant difference existed between performing second-core and fourth-core biopsies in terms of csPC detection success (92.2%–100%, p = 0.07).

Conclusion

We concluded that taking 2-core biopsies from the center of each ROIs during a transrectal TPB is sufficient for diagnosing csPC.

Background

The use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes), the alternative to conventional smoking, is increasing considerably worldwide; however, their safety is a matter of debate. Several studies have demonstrated their toxic effects, but no study assessed their effects on the prostate.

Objective

The current study aimed at evaluating e-cigarettes and conventional smoking prostate toxicity and effects on the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), phosphatase and tensin (PTEN), and prostate transmembrane protein androgen induced 1 (PMEPA1).

Method

30 young Wistar rats were categorized into three groups (n = 10) as follows: the control group, the conventional smoking group, and the e-cigarette group. The case groups were exposed to cigarettes or e-cigarettes for 40 minutes, 3 times a day for four months. Serum parameters, prostate pathology, and gene expression were measured at the end of the intervention. Data were analyzed by Graph Pad prism 9.

Results

Histopathological findings presented that both types of cigarette-induced hyperemia and induced inflammatory cell infiltration and hypertrophy of smooth muscle of the vascular wall in the e-cigarette group. Expression of PMEPA1, and VEGFA genes significantly increased in conventional (2.67-fold; P = 0.0108, 1.80-fold; P = 0.0461 respectively) and e-cigarettes (1.98-fold; P = 0.0127, 1.34-fold; P = 0.938, respectively) groups compared to the control group. Expression of the PTEN gene non-significantly decreased in the case of groups compared to the control group.

Conclusion

We found no significant differences between the two groups in terms of PTEN and PMEPA1 expression, whereas VEGFA was significantly more expressed in a conventional smoking group compared to the e-cigarette group. Therefore, it seems that e-cigarettes could not be taken into account as a better option than conventional smoking, and quitting smoking still is the optimal option.

Background

The optimal condition for the clinical application of ¹⁸F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography–computed tomography (FCH-PET/CT) to detect recurrence sites in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure remains unclear due to the heterogeneity of prostate cancer failure. We aimed to evaluate the detection rate of FCH-PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with PSA failure and to determine the optimal PSA level for performing FCH-PET/CT.

Methods

FCH-PET/CT was conducted in 89 patients diagnosed with PSA failure after radical treatment (radical prostatectomy in 75 and definitive radiotherapy in 14) between November 2018 and May 2021. Detection rates were examined via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors affecting positive FCH-PET/CT findings. We also conducted subgroup analyses according to the PSA failure patterns after the radical treatment (persistently high PSA [N = 48] and biochemical recurrence [BCR] [N = 41]).

Results

FCH-PET/CT demonstrated a 59.6% overall detection rate, and the optimal PSA threshold for detecting positive findings was ≥ 1.00 ng/mL at the time of imaging. On multivariable analysis, PSA > 1.00 ng/mL (P < 0.001) was a significant predictor of positive FCH-PET/CT findings, especially regarding distant bone metastases (P < 0.001) and recurrence outside the pelvis (P < 0.001). In a subgroup analysis of patients with BCR after initial radical treatment, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.82, and PSA ≥ 1.75 ng/mL was the optimal value for identifying positive FCH-PET/CT findings. This PSA value was also associated with significantly higher detection rates of distant bone metastases and outside-pelvis metastasis (P < 0.001, both).

Conclusion

FCH-PET/CT is a clinically useful tool for detecting tumor recurrence sites in prostate cancer patients with PSA failure if PSA has exceeded a certain value at the time of imaging. Particularly, higher AUC values were observed when FCH-PET/CT was performed in patients with BCR after initial treatment.

Purpose

This article aims to evaluate the pooled diagnostic performance control MRI for prediction of recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU).

Materials and methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases up to December 31, 2021, were searched. We included studies providing 2×2 contingency table for diagnostic performance of MRI in predicting recurrent PCa after HIFU, using control biopsy as reference standard. The quality of the included studies was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2). Sensitivity and specificity were pooled and displayed in a summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) plot. Meta-regression analysis using clinically relevant covariates was performed for the causes of heterogeneity.

Results

Nineteen studies (703 patients) were included. All included studies satisfied at least four of the seven QUADAS-2 domains. Pooled sensitivity was 0.81 (95% CI 0.72–0.90) with specificity of 0.91 (95% CI 0.86–0.96), with area under the SROC curve of 0.81. Larger studies including more than 50 patients showed relatively poor sensitivity (0.68 vs. 0.84) and specificity (0.75 vs. 0.93). The diagnostic performance of studies reporting higher nadir serum prostate-specific antigen levels (>1 ng/mL) after HIFU was inferior, and differed significantly in sensitivity (0.54 vs. 0.78) rather than specificity (0.85 vs. 0.91).

Conclusions

Although MRI showed adequate diagnostic performance in predicting PCa recurrence after HIFU, these results may have been exaggerated.