Prostate International最新文献

Background

To demonstrate the clinical usefulness of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) computerized tomography (CT) for irreversible electroporation (IRE) in prostate cancer patients.

Methods

From January to May 2021, 17 men were diagnosed with localized prostate cancer through preoperative mpMRI and [¹⁸F] florastamin PSMA PET-CT imaging, followed by transperineal MRI-ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy. The patients underwent IRE focal therapy at the target lesions under general anesthesia. To evaluate the treatment outcome, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were followed up in the 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th months, and mpMRI was taken in the 1st and 12th months, followed by MR fusion biopsy in the 12th month post-IRE.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 66.1 ± 9.3 with a median PSA of 7.5 ng/ml. After the treatment, PSA nadir was 4.06 ± 3.4, and 11 (64.7%) achieved decline of PSA more than 50% from the baseline. Rate of negative biopsy for prostate cancer is 88% (15/17) at 12 months MR fusion biopsy after the IRE treatment. Among the relapsed cases, 1 (6.9%) patient recurred at margin of treated area, and 1 (6.9%) patient was from outfield recurrence. When excluding initial four patients, none of the patients had cancer recur.

Conclusions

When treating with IRE focal therapy, PSMA-PET CT is a potentially valuable diagnostic approach for localizing prostate cancer; it supports the detection of lesions with conventional mpMRI, enabling to perform the procedure more completely.

Lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia constitute a substantial burden, affecting the quality of life of those affected by this condition. While watchful waiting and medical management using a wide array of pharmaceuticals can be effective, surgery has been one of the most definite solutions for those highly affected by this condition. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the gold standard surgical procedure, but other alternatives using laser (HoLEP and ThuLEP) and robotic water jets (Aquablation) are emerging treatments aimed at reducing postoperative morbidity. Minimally invasive procedures conducted in outpatient settings and under local anesthesia or sedation are increasingly being used, especially in those patients with high surgical risk due to comorbidities. These procedures include prostatic arterial embolization, water vapor thermal therapy (Rezum), prostatic urethral lift (Urolift), temporary implantable nitinol device (TIND/iTIND), and transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT). The evidence supporting these treatments is growing, but some uncertainties remain as to what is the magnitude of their advantages and disadvantages compared to TURP. Innovations in the technologies involved in these new procedures may improve their profile for effectiveness and safety. Moreover, new devices are being investigated for marketing approval. Issues around costs and patients’ preferences are also yet to be elucidated, thus their evolving role needs to be weighed against the aforementioned considerations.

Background

To investigate whether intrarectal local anesthesia with heated lidocaine gel (IRLAH) is non-inferior to periprostatic nerve block (PNB) for reducing pain in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy.

Methods

We performed a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial with 100 participants who underwent systematic TRUS-guided, 12-core prostate biopsy from August 2019 to July 2020. These participants were randomly assigned to a group receiving intrarectal local anesthesia with 20 mL of heated (40°C) 2% lidocaine gel (n = 50) or PNB (n = 50). The primary outcome was a pain score on a 0–10 visual analogue scale (VAS) at four time points with the non-inferiority margin of 1; VAS-1: during local anesthesia application; VAS-2: during probe insertion; VAS-3: during biopsy; VAS-4: 30 minutes after the procedure. The secondary outcome included complications during and after the procedure.

Results

The IRLAH group (0.1) met non-inferiority as well as superiority criteria for mean VAS-1 score vs. the PNB group (2.33) (P < 0.001), as the difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) between the two groups was −2.23 (−2.66 to −1.79) and the upper bound of the 95% CI were both below the prespecified non-inferiority margin and below zero. For mean VAS-3 score, the difference (95% CI) was 0.3 (−0.38 to 0.98) and the upper bound of the 95% CI did not exceed the predefined non-inferiority margin indicating that IRLAH was non-inferior (IRLAH group, 3.44; PNB group, 3.14). Also, non-inferiority was shown for pain scores at VAS-2 and VAS-4. There were no significant differences in complications.

Conclusion

IRLAH is a noninvasive and non-inferior alternative to PNB for pain control in TRUS-guided prostate biopsy without increased risk of complications.

Background

To investigate the effect of systemic hypertension on the prostatic artery resistive indices by a comparative ultrasonographic evaluation of the prostate gland in normotensive and hypertensive patients with benign prostatic enlargement (BPE).

Materials and methods

The participants had BPE and presented at the outpatient urologic clinic of a tertiary hospital. They were divided into normotensive and hypertensive groups. Each group had fifty patients. Calculation of international prostate symptom score, measurement of blood pressure, and transrectal ultrasonographic evaluation were done.

Results

The mean age for the normotensive and hypertensive groups were 66.9 ± 9.8 and 66.0 ± 10.7 years, respectively (P = 0.662). Patients with hypertensive BPE had a significantly higher mean transitional zone volume, transitional zone index, presumed circle area ratio, quality of life score, and prostatic arterial resistive indices than the age-matched normotensive BPE patients.

Conclusion

Patients with BPE and with hypertension had significantly higher prostate arteries resistive indices than normotensives with BPE. Even in patients with BPE and controlled hypertension, the prostatic artery resistance indices were still elevated than that of normotensive men with BPE.

Background

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been a treatment for men who suffer from intermediated to high-risk prostate cancer in Australia since 2003. The primary outcomes in relation to learning curves in robotic surgery have been extensively researched in overseas populations, but there is no study from a cohort of Australian surgeons performing RARP. This study aims to highlight the effect of RARP learning curves on primary surgical outcomes in a high-volume Australian centre.

Methods

A retrospective audit of all RARP performed at Epworth Healthcare from 2016 to 2021 was performed. The primary outcome data collected included operating time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), and positive surgical margins (PSM). Exclusion criteria were applied. Positive outcomes were set at OT 240 min, blood loss 310 mL, and negative surgical margins.

Results

A total of 3969 cases were analysed for a cohort of 53 surgeons. Of these surgeons, 24 surgeons have performed >50 operations to be able to undergo learning curve analysis. The median OT was 229 min, the median blood loss was 353 mL, and most cases had negative surgical margins (>1 mm, n = 3681, 92.7%). The mean learning curve transition point was 65 cases. There was a significant difference in the EBL and rate of PSM for the higher volume cohort (p = 0.002 and <0.0001, respectively).

Conclusion

We perform a retrospective study of all RARP performed at a high-volume Australian centre. Higher volume surgeons demonstrate that primary outcomes improve with a higher caseload (EBL, PSM). Learning curve transition points for RARP are comparable to international high-volume surgeons. Learning curve data could form the benchmark for RARP training and skills development.

Background

It is common to repeat prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurements for men with PSA elevation before prostate biopsy. In this scenario, they may have considerable psychological distress in fear of the presence of cancer until retests. We assessed possible clinical factors causing transient PSA rise and explored the parameters predictive of subsequent PSA change.

Methods

As interfering conditions, the history of ejaculation, bicycling, and any types of infections were assessed using the questionnaire. The pattern of PSA change was compared in association with the various clinical factors. Predictive significance of PSA kinetics such as coefficient of variation (CV) and PSA velocity (PSAV) for PSA values at retest was evaluated.

Results

The rate of reversion to the normal range was 38.3% at retest. The rate of 12.8% of men showed a large increase by ≥20%, whereas 38.2% of men showed a large decline by ≥20% from the baseline. Men with younger age (≤60 years), small prostate (<20 cc), and prior history of ejaculation or infections showed significantly larger PSA decrease than their counterparts. Those with large CV or PSAV before the baseline more frequently showed PSA decrease below the age-specific cutoff or decline by ≥10% from the baseline at retest. These parameters associated with PSA kinetics had independent predictive values for relevant PSA change at retest.

Conclusions

Ejaculation and any types of infections should be avoided before PSA tests. Men with large PSA fluctuation before the baseline are likely to show a significant PSA decrease at retest. This predictive information may help both physicians to determine whether to proceed to an immediate biopsy and patients to reduce their psychological burden.

Background

Holmium enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is becoming the gold standard for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Our objective was to identify predictors of 30-day readmission and the impact of same-day discharge after HoLEP.

Methods

Using NSQIP data from 2011 to 2019, we identified men who underwent HoLEP for the treatment of BPH. We compared patients based on time of discharge and readmission status. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis (MLRA) to identify independent factors associated with 30-day readmission.

Results

A total of 3,489 patients met inclusion criteria with 833 (23.88%) being discharged within 24 hours and 2,656 (76.12%) discharged after 24 hours. There were 158 (4.53%) 30-day readmissions, mostly due to hematuria and urinary tract infection. Patients being readmitted were older (72 vs. 70 years old, P = 0.001), were more likely to have preoperative anemia (36.7% vs. 23.1%; P < 0.001), chronic kidney disease (29.7% vs. 19.7%; P < 0.001), bleeding disorder (10.8% vs. 2.8%; P < 0.001), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores (≥3: 70.3% vs. 46.7%; P < 0.001) and a higher frailty burden (5-item modified frailty index [5i-mFI] ≥ 2: 36.1% vs. 19.1%; P < 0.001) compared to their counterparts. Factors independently associated with 30-day readmission were bleeding disorder (OR 2.89; 95% CI 1.63–5.11; P < 0.001), 5i-mFI ≥ 2 (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.03–2.71; P = 0.038) and an ASA score ≥3 (OR 1.80; 95% CI 1.21–2.70; P = 0.004); however, same-day discharge was not found to be a significant predictor of 30-day readmissions.

Conclusion

The overall readmission rate after HoLEP is low. Patients discharged within 24 hours have similar rates of readmission compared to patients discharged after 24 hours. We found bleeding disorder, frailty burden, and ASA score to be independent predictors of 30-day readmission.

Objectives

The analysis of the oncological outcomes and postoperative continence recovery between conventional robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (cRARP) and Retzius-sparing RARP (rsRARP), and the effect of the tumor location on them.

Materials and methods

A total of 317 patients who underwent cRARP (n = 228) or rsRARP (n = 89) from August 2017 to July 2020 were assessed. Patients were categorized into groups based on the tumor location by pathology. Positive surgical margin (PSM) rates and biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survivals and continence recovery were compared between the two procedures.

Results

Patient age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, clinical stages, and Gleason score were not significantly different between the two groups. There was no significant difference in PSM rates (25.8% vs. 33.7%, p = 0.13) or BCR-free survivals (p = 0.28) between cRARP and rsRARP in patients. When tumor was located in the anterior lesion in the prostatectomy pathology, rsRARP was associated with significantly higher PSM rates than cRARP (53.3% in rsRARP vs. 27.0% in cRARP, p = 0.0086), while BCR-free survival did not vary significantly (hazard ratio: 2.15, p = 0.11). When tumors were identified in the posterior in prostatectomy pathology, PSM rates (28.8% in rsRARP vs. 24.7% in cRARP, p = 0.59) or BCR-free survivals (hazard ratio: 0.78, p = 0.51) did not differ significantly between the two groups. rsRARP yielded superior continence recovery in all time points compared to cRARP, which was not affected by the pathological tumor location.

Conclusion

In posterior tumors, rsRARP results in similar oncological outcomes as cRARP with superior continence recovery, while in anterior tumors, rsRARP may associate with higher PSM rate, combined with improved continence recovery.

Objectives

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) refers to nonmalignant hyperplasia of prostate tissue, which causes lower urinary tract symptoms and has become a global public health concern in the aging population. The purpose of this study is to identify modifiable factors, which would prevent or delay BPH development.

Methods

The association between BPH marker drugs and climate-, socioeconomic-, health condition-, and lifestyle habits-related variables was investigated by analyzing nationwide datasets which were collected in 2018, aggregated by prefecture (administrative unit), and published by Japanese ministries. Uroselective α₁ receptor blockers and dutasteride were used as marker drugs referring to BPH prevalence. Correlation analysis, multiple linear regression analysis, and binomial logistic regression analysis were conducted with 47 Japanese prefectures as the unit.

Results

The variables which showed |r| > 0.5 by correlation analysis were exercise habits (r = −0.5696), smoking habits (r = 0.6116), and daily drinking (r = 0.6001) for uroselective α₁ receptor blockers, and antihypertensive medication (r = 0.5971), smoking habits (r = 0.6598), a small amount of drinking (r = −0.5292), and serum alanine aminotransferase (r = 0.6814) for dutasteride. Multiple linear regression equations were constructed by including these variables (R² = 0.5453 for uroselective α₁ receptor blockers and R² = 0.5673 for dutasteride). Binomial logistic regression analysis found a significant association between climate in the resident area and BPH development.

Conclusion

This ecological study, analyzing Japanese nationwide datasets, demonstrates that healthy lifestyle habits, especially avoidance of smoking, implementation of exercise in daily life, and a small amount of alcohol consumption, are important to prevent or delay BPH development. High blood pressure and high serum alanine aminotransferase are suggested as risk factors of BPH development.

Background

Iodine-125 low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) is a treatment modality utilized in both localized and advanced prostate cancer (PCa). We aimed to evaluate the long-term oncological outcomes in patients with PCa who underwent LDR-BT, at a single institution in Japan.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 340 consecutive patients with localized PCa who underwent LDR-BT between August 2004 and December 2014 at our institution. Patients with low-risk PCa who had a pretreatment prostate volume >50 mL received neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for at least 3 months before LDR-BT. Patients with intermediate-risk PCa were treated with a combination of LDR-BT and/or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and/or ADT for 9 months. Patients with high-risk PCa underwent LDR-BT, EBRT, and ADT for 24 months. The endpoints of this study were biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) and overall survival (OS). Additionally, the association between biochemical recurrence (BCR) and clinical/pathological covariates was analyzed.

Results

At the end of the follow-up period, nine patients (2.6%) showed BCR, and six patients (1.8%) developed secondary cancers after LDR-BT. The 5-year and 10-year BRFS rates were 99.4% and 95.3%, respectively. Factoring in the patients’ ages, the 5-year and 10-year BRFS rates were 99.1% and 99.1%, respectively, in patients aged >63 years. The rates were 100% and 89.4% in those aged ≤63 years, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, age ≤63 years was identified as a significant independent predictor of BCR after LDR-BT.

Conclusion

Age ≤63 years was a significant predictor of BCR following LDR-BT. Although the risk of secondary malignant neoplasms should be considered when opting for LDR-BT in younger patients with PCa, the prevalence of them in these patients is relatively low. Therefore, clinicians should weigh the risks and benefits of definitive therapy in PCa, particularly in younger patients.