首页 > 最新文献

Radiology最新文献

英文 中文
Establishing CT-derived Normative Liver and Spleen Volumes for Children: Validation in Regional and International Datasets. 建立儿童ct衍生的标准肝脏和脾脏体积:区域和国际数据集的验证。
IF 15.2 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.251953
Jae-Yeon Hwang, Young Hun Choi, Ah Young Jung, Young Ah Cho, Jin Seong Lee, Hee Mang Yoon, Seung Soo Lee, Seonok Kim, Jun Su Park, Mi Young Kim, Hwon Heo, Woo Hyun Shim, Ki Seok Choo, Elanchezhian Somasundaram, Vinicius de Padua V Alves, Pyeong Hwa Kim

Background Volumetric evaluation of liver and spleen size is useful, yet pediatric reference values remain limited and lack external validation. Purpose To establish normative liver and spleen volumes from contrast-enhanced CT in children and validate them in external regional and international datasets. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scans (patient age, 2-18 years) from Asan Medical Center and Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital (January 2005 to June 2021) were collected for the derivation dataset. Patients with chronic diseases, liver and/or spleen imaging abnormalities, or missing height and/or weight measurement within 3 months were excluded. Portal-phase CT images were segmented automatically with manual correction. Data from Seoul National University Children's Hospital (January 2018 to December 2021) and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (January 2018 to July 2021) were used for regional and international validation, respectively. Model performance was assessed with the average pinball loss and absolute errors for predicting 50th percentiles. Results A total of 1298 children (median age, 11.3 years [IQR, 8.0-15.0 years]; 660 female) were included (derivation set, n = 1030 [all Asian]; regional validation set, n = 114 [all Asian]; international validation set, n = 154 [racially diverse]). The model including sex, height, and weight had the lowest average pinball loss for predicting 50th percentile liver (54.50 mL) and spleen (18.64 mL) volume and was therefore selected. Compared with previously published formulas, the model showed lower average pinball loss in the regional validation dataset for both liver (5th, 11.55 mL vs 11.93 mL; 50th, 50.88 mL vs 55.47-116.02 mL; 95th, 15.85 mL vs 19.49 mL) and spleen volumes (5th, 3.69 mL vs 3.74 mL; 50th, 15.19 mL vs 16.03 mL; 95th, 5.01 mL vs 5.59 mL). In international external validation, the average pinball loss was lower for the 50th percentiles (liver, 50.28 mL vs 50.30 mL; spleen, 20.97 mL vs 21.42 mL), and absolute errors were comparable (liver, 100.56 mL vs 100.60 mL [P = .53]; spleen, 41.93 mL vs 42.83 mL [P = .69]). Conclusion Normative liver and spleen volumes in children derived using quantile regression models and the respective predictive performance were presented. © RSNA, 2026 Supplemental material is available for this article.

肝脏和脾脏体积评估是有用的,但儿科参考值仍然有限,缺乏外部验证。目的建立儿童肝脏和脾脏对比增强CT的标准体积,并在外部区域和国际数据集中进行验证。在这项回顾性研究中,收集了峨山医疗中心和釜山国立大学梁山医院(2005年1月至2021年6月)的对比增强腹部CT扫描(患者年龄,2-18岁),用于衍生数据集。排除慢性疾病、肝脏和/或脾脏影像学异常、3个月内未测量身高和/或体重的患者。门相CT图像通过人工校正自动分割。首尔国立大学儿童医院(2018年1月至2021年12月)和辛辛那提儿童医院医疗中心(2018年1月至2021年7月)的数据分别用于区域和国际验证。用平均弹球损失和预测第50百分位的绝对误差来评估模型的性能。结果共纳入1298例儿童(中位年龄11.3岁[IQR, 8.0 ~ 15.0岁],女性660例)(衍生集,n = 1030[全亚洲];区域验证集,n = 114[全亚洲];国际验证集,n = 154[不同种族])。包含性别、身高和体重的模型在预测肝脏(54.50 mL)和脾脏(18.64 mL)体积方面的平均弹珠损失最低,因此被选中。与先前发表的公式相比,该模型在区域验证数据集中显示肝脏(第5位,11.55 mL vs 11.93 mL;第50位,50.88 mL vs 55.47-116.02 mL;第95位,15.85 mL vs 19.49 mL)和脾脏体积(第5位,3.69 mL vs 3.74 mL;第50位,15.19 mL vs 16.03 mL;第95位,5.01 mL vs 5.59 mL)的平均弹珠损失更低。在国际外部验证中,第50百分位数的平均弹珠损失较低(肝脏,50.28 mL vs 50.30 mL;脾脏,20.97 mL vs 21.42 mL),绝对误差相当(肝脏,100.56 mL vs 100.60 mL [P = .53];脾脏,41.93 mL vs 42.83 mL [P = .69])。结论采用分位数回归模型推导出儿童肝脏和脾脏的正常体积,并给出相应的预测效果。©RSNA, 2026本文提供补充材料。
{"title":"Establishing CT-derived Normative Liver and Spleen Volumes for Children: Validation in Regional and International Datasets.","authors":"Jae-Yeon Hwang, Young Hun Choi, Ah Young Jung, Young Ah Cho, Jin Seong Lee, Hee Mang Yoon, Seung Soo Lee, Seonok Kim, Jun Su Park, Mi Young Kim, Hwon Heo, Woo Hyun Shim, Ki Seok Choo, Elanchezhian Somasundaram, Vinicius de Padua V Alves, Pyeong Hwa Kim","doi":"10.1148/radiol.251953","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.251953","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Volumetric evaluation of liver and spleen size is useful, yet pediatric reference values remain limited and lack external validation. Purpose To establish normative liver and spleen volumes from contrast-enhanced CT in children and validate them in external regional and international datasets. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scans (patient age, 2-18 years) from Asan Medical Center and Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital (January 2005 to June 2021) were collected for the derivation dataset. Patients with chronic diseases, liver and/or spleen imaging abnormalities, or missing height and/or weight measurement within 3 months were excluded. Portal-phase CT images were segmented automatically with manual correction. Data from Seoul National University Children's Hospital (January 2018 to December 2021) and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (January 2018 to July 2021) were used for regional and international validation, respectively. Model performance was assessed with the average pinball loss and absolute errors for predicting 50th percentiles. Results A total of 1298 children (median age, 11.3 years [IQR, 8.0-15.0 years]; 660 female) were included (derivation set, <i>n</i> = 1030 [all Asian]; regional validation set, <i>n</i> = 114 [all Asian]; international validation set, <i>n</i> = 154 [racially diverse]). The model including sex, height, and weight had the lowest average pinball loss for predicting 50th percentile liver (54.50 mL) and spleen (18.64 mL) volume and was therefore selected. Compared with previously published formulas, the model showed lower average pinball loss in the regional validation dataset for both liver (5th, 11.55 mL vs 11.93 mL; 50th, 50.88 mL vs 55.47-116.02 mL; 95th, 15.85 mL vs 19.49 mL) and spleen volumes (5th, 3.69 mL vs 3.74 mL; 50th, 15.19 mL vs 16.03 mL; 95th, 5.01 mL vs 5.59 mL). In international external validation, the average pinball loss was lower for the 50th percentiles (liver, 50.28 mL vs 50.30 mL; spleen, 20.97 mL vs 21.42 mL), and absolute errors were comparable (liver, 100.56 mL vs 100.60 mL [<i>P</i> = .53]; spleen, 41.93 mL vs 42.83 mL [<i>P</i> = .69]). Conclusion Normative liver and spleen volumes in children derived using quantile regression models and the respective predictive performance were presented. © RSNA, 2026 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"318 1","pages":"e251953"},"PeriodicalIF":15.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146053483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study and Canadian C-Spine Rule Criteria and Their Clinical Impact on Cervical Spine Imaging: Best Practice. 评估国家紧急x线摄影应用研究和加拿大颈椎规则标准及其对颈椎成像的临床影响:最佳实践。
IF 19.7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.243834
Shadi Asadollahi,Parisa Arjmand,Arjun Chanmugam,Matthew Dattwyler,Caline Azzi,Mahla Radmard,David M Yousem
This article evaluates the effectiveness and implementation of two clinical decision rules for assessing cervical spine injuries after blunt trauma: the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) criteria and the Canadian C-Spine Rule (CCR). Both rules aim to reduce unnecessary imaging, which can be costly and expose patients to radiation, by identifying individuals at low risk who do not require cervical spine CT. The five NEXUS criteria are easy to apply but may have inconsistent interpretations. Although more complex and time-consuming, the CCR provides a structured algorithm to more effectively reduce unnecessary imaging. Both rules have high sensitivity for detecting clinically significant injuries. Potential pitfalls include incomplete documentation and variability in clinician interpretation, emphasizing the importance of proper training in implementing these rules. The American College of Radiology recommends CT as the initial imaging method for adults meeting NEXUS or CCR criteria. Pediatric clinical decision support rules vary by patient age and may use radiography and MRI in different instances, but older children are typically assessed like adults. With the increased availability of cervical spine CT, it is essential to improve imaging decisions with respect to patient impact and health care costs while minimizing radiation exposure, especially in younger patients.
本文评估了评估钝性创伤后颈椎损伤的两项临床决策规则的有效性和实施情况:国家紧急x线摄影应用研究(NEXUS)标准和加拿大颈椎规则(CCR)。这两项规定都旨在通过识别不需要颈椎CT的低风险个体,减少不必要的成像,这些成像既昂贵又使患者暴露于辐射之下。NEXUS的五个标准很容易适用,但可能有不一致的解释。虽然更复杂和耗时,但CCR提供了一种结构化的算法,可以更有效地减少不必要的成像。这两种规则对检测临床显著损伤都有很高的灵敏度。潜在的缺陷包括不完整的文件和临床医生解释的可变性,强调了在实施这些规则时进行适当培训的重要性。美国放射学会推荐CT作为符合NEXUS或CCR标准的成人的初始成像方法。儿科临床决策支持规则因患者年龄而异,可能在不同情况下使用x射线和MRI,但年龄较大的儿童通常像成年人一样进行评估。随着颈椎CT可用性的提高,在最大限度地减少辐射暴露的同时,改善患者影响和医疗保健成本方面的成像决策至关重要,尤其是在年轻患者中。
{"title":"Evaluating National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study and Canadian C-Spine Rule Criteria and Their Clinical Impact on Cervical Spine Imaging: Best Practice.","authors":"Shadi Asadollahi,Parisa Arjmand,Arjun Chanmugam,Matthew Dattwyler,Caline Azzi,Mahla Radmard,David M Yousem","doi":"10.1148/radiol.243834","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.243834","url":null,"abstract":"This article evaluates the effectiveness and implementation of two clinical decision rules for assessing cervical spine injuries after blunt trauma: the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) criteria and the Canadian C-Spine Rule (CCR). Both rules aim to reduce unnecessary imaging, which can be costly and expose patients to radiation, by identifying individuals at low risk who do not require cervical spine CT. The five NEXUS criteria are easy to apply but may have inconsistent interpretations. Although more complex and time-consuming, the CCR provides a structured algorithm to more effectively reduce unnecessary imaging. Both rules have high sensitivity for detecting clinically significant injuries. Potential pitfalls include incomplete documentation and variability in clinician interpretation, emphasizing the importance of proper training in implementing these rules. The American College of Radiology recommends CT as the initial imaging method for adults meeting NEXUS or CCR criteria. Pediatric clinical decision support rules vary by patient age and may use radiography and MRI in different instances, but older children are typically assessed like adults. With the increased availability of cervical spine CT, it is essential to improve imaging decisions with respect to patient impact and health care costs while minimizing radiation exposure, especially in younger patients.","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"14 1","pages":"e243834"},"PeriodicalIF":19.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145907543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pretreatment CT Identification of Extranodal Extension in Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Cancers Using Deep Learning. 基于深度学习的喉癌和下咽癌结外延伸的预处理CT识别。
IF 15.2 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.250332
Na Shen, Yirui Wang, Cheng Yan, Jian Wang, Dandan Zheng, Xuewei Wang, Dazhou Guo, Haoshen Li, Qinji Yu, Zi Li, Yuzhen Chen, Ke Yan, Le Lu, Xianghua Ye, Mengsu Zeng, Xinsheng Huang, Tsung-Ying Ho, Fang Zhang, Dakai Jin

Background Accurate preoperative identification of pathologic extranodal extension (ENE) at CT is essential for precise treatment decisions in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell cancer (LHSCC). However, human interpretation of ENE is neither reliable nor reproducible. Purpose To develop and evaluate the diagnostic performance of a new deep learning tool, DeepENE, in detecting metastatic and ENE lymph nodes on preoperative CT scans in patients with LHSCC in a multicenter cohort. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, patients with LHSCC from Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University (April 2011-August 2022), were included in training, validation, and internal test sets to develop DeepENE. For the reference standard, lymph nodes were segmented on CT scans and labeled for metastasis and ENE status based on pathologic findings. DeepENE was tested using three external cohorts of patients with LHSCC (external test sets 1-3) and one external cohort of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. The primary diagnostic metric was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The performance of DeepENE was compared with that of five board-certified head and neck cancer specialists using the DeLong method. Results Overall, 289 patients with LHSCC with 1954 pathologically confirmed lymph nodes were evaluated. DeepENE achieved an AUC of 0.93 for ENE diagnosis in the internal test set under fivefold cross-validation, and AUCs of 0.96, 0.87, and 0.90 in external test sets 1, 2, and 3, respectively. DeepENE outperformed the five experts, especially in early-stage ENE detection in external test set 2 (AUC of 0.87 for DeepENE vs mean AUC of 0.66 for readers; P < .001). In external test set 1, DeepENE maintained a high sensitivity of 97% at specificity of 90%, compared with experts' mean sensitivity of 77% (P = .003). In external test sets 2 and 3, DeepENE had sensitivity of 78% and 80%, compared with experts' mean sensitivity of 36% (P < .001) and 46% (P < .001), respectively. Conclusion DeepENE accurately detected ENE on preoperative CT scans in patients with LHSCC and outperformed head and neck cancer specialists. © RSNA, 2026 Supplemental material is available for this article.

背景:术前在CT上准确识别病理结外延伸(ENE)对于喉部和下咽鳞状细胞癌(LHSCC)的精确治疗决策至关重要。然而,人类对ENE的解释既不可靠,也不可重复。目的在一项多中心队列研究中,开发并评估一种新的深度学习工具DeepENE在LHSCC患者术前CT扫描中检测转移性和ENE淋巴结的诊断性能。材料与方法在这项回顾性研究中,复旦大学中山医院2011年4月至2022年8月期间的LHSCC患者被纳入培训、验证和内部测试集,以开发DeepENE。作为参考标准,在CT扫描上对淋巴结进行分割,并根据病理结果标记转移和ENE状态。DeepENE通过三个LHSCC患者外部队列(外部测试组1-3)和一个口腔鳞状细胞癌患者外部队列进行测试。主要诊断指标是受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。使用DeLong方法将DeepENE的性能与五位委员会认证的头颈癌专家的性能进行比较。结果289例LHSCC患者,病理证实淋巴结1954个。在5倍交叉验证下,DeepENE在内部测试集诊断ENE的AUC为0.93,在外部测试集1、2和3的AUC分别为0.96、0.87和0.90。DeepENE的表现优于五位专家,特别是在外部测试集2的早期ENE检测方面(DeepENE的AUC为0.87,而读者的平均AUC为0.66;P < .001)。在外部测试集1中,DeepENE在90%的特异性下保持了97%的高灵敏度,而专家的平均灵敏度为77% (P = 0.003)。在外部测试集2和3中,DeepENE的灵敏度为78%和80%,而专家的平均灵敏度分别为36% (P < .001)和46% (P < .001)。结论DeepENE在LHSCC患者术前CT扫描中能准确检测出ENE,优于头颈部肿瘤专家。©RSNA, 2026本文提供补充材料。
{"title":"Pretreatment CT Identification of Extranodal Extension in Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Cancers Using Deep Learning.","authors":"Na Shen, Yirui Wang, Cheng Yan, Jian Wang, Dandan Zheng, Xuewei Wang, Dazhou Guo, Haoshen Li, Qinji Yu, Zi Li, Yuzhen Chen, Ke Yan, Le Lu, Xianghua Ye, Mengsu Zeng, Xinsheng Huang, Tsung-Ying Ho, Fang Zhang, Dakai Jin","doi":"10.1148/radiol.250332","DOIUrl":"10.1148/radiol.250332","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Accurate preoperative identification of pathologic extranodal extension (ENE) at CT is essential for precise treatment decisions in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell cancer (LHSCC). However, human interpretation of ENE is neither reliable nor reproducible. Purpose To develop and evaluate the diagnostic performance of a new deep learning tool, DeepENE, in detecting metastatic and ENE lymph nodes on preoperative CT scans in patients with LHSCC in a multicenter cohort. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, patients with LHSCC from Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University (April 2011-August 2022), were included in training, validation, and internal test sets to develop DeepENE. For the reference standard, lymph nodes were segmented on CT scans and labeled for metastasis and ENE status based on pathologic findings. DeepENE was tested using three external cohorts of patients with LHSCC (external test sets 1-3) and one external cohort of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. The primary diagnostic metric was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The performance of DeepENE was compared with that of five board-certified head and neck cancer specialists using the DeLong method. Results Overall, 289 patients with LHSCC with 1954 pathologically confirmed lymph nodes were evaluated. DeepENE achieved an AUC of 0.93 for ENE diagnosis in the internal test set under fivefold cross-validation, and AUCs of 0.96, 0.87, and 0.90 in external test sets 1, 2, and 3, respectively. DeepENE outperformed the five experts, especially in early-stage ENE detection in external test set 2 (AUC of 0.87 for DeepENE vs mean AUC of 0.66 for readers; <i>P</i> < .001). In external test set 1, DeepENE maintained a high sensitivity of 97% at specificity of 90%, compared with experts' mean sensitivity of 77% (<i>P</i> = .003). In external test sets 2 and 3, DeepENE had sensitivity of 78% and 80%, compared with experts' mean sensitivity of 36% (<i>P</i> < .001) and 46% (<i>P</i> < .001), respectively. Conclusion DeepENE accurately detected ENE on preoperative CT scans in patients with LHSCC and outperformed head and neck cancer specialists. © RSNA, 2026 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"318 1","pages":"e250332"},"PeriodicalIF":15.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145960115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of Tibial Nerve Microcirculation in Diabetes Mellitus at Superresolution US. 糖尿病患者胫神经微循环的超分辨超声评价。
IF 15.2 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.250347
Fang Liu, ShuJun Xia, Qing Hua, CongCong Yuan, YuHang Zheng, RuoLin Tao, JiaLe Xu, YuLu Zhang, FangGang Wu, Wei Guo, Yuan Tian, YiJie Dong, JianQiao Zhou

Background Dysfunction of the peripheral nerve microcirculation is crucial in the onset and progression of diabetic neuropathy. Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of superresolution US for quantifying tibial nerve microvasculature in diabetic adults with and without peripheral neuropathy, and in control participants. Materials and Methods In this prospective single-center study, consecutive participants were enrolled between June 2024 and October 2024 and divided into three groups: group I, diabetic peripheral neuropathy with ulcers; group II, type 2 diabetes without peripheral neuropathy; and group III, the control group. All participants underwent conventional US in the tibial nerves followed by superresolution US with intravenous microbubble injection. Regions of interest were delineated manually along the tibial nerve. Quantitative parameters, including interfascicular and intrafascicular vessel ratio, complexity, density, velocity, perfusion index, and single-vessel curvature were compared using one-way analysis of variance (parametric) and Dunn-corrected Kruskal-Wallis (nonparametric) tests. Results A total of 100 participants were enrolled, including 30 participants in group I (mean age, 67 years ± 10 [SD]; 23 men), 35 in group II (mean age, 61 years ± 11; 20 men), and 35 in group III (mean age, 54 years ± 14; 15 men). Superresolution US showed group I had higher vessel ratio (23% vs 10% vs 6%), complexity level (1.3 vs 1.2 vs 1.1), maximum density (25 vs 20 vs 12), mean velocity (12.6 vs 8.7 vs 8.4 mm/sec), perfusion index (4.5 vs 1.4 vs 0.9), and curvature (1.19 vs 1.09 vs 1.05) compared with groups II and III, respectively (all P < .05). Microvascular tortuosity was observed in 83% (25 of 30), 43% (15 of 35), and 14% (five of 35) of groups I, II, and III, respectively (P < .001). Conclusion Superresolution US provided a 10-μm scale resolution view of tibial nerve microvascular structure, helping to identify microvascular alterations in participants with diabetic peripheral neuropathy with ulcers. © RSNA, 2026 Supplemental material is available for this article.

背景:周围神经微循环功能障碍是糖尿病神经病变发生和发展的关键。目的评价超分辨率超声在伴有和不伴有周围神经病变的成年糖尿病患者及对照组中定量胫骨神经微血管的可行性。材料与方法在这项前瞻性单中心研究中,受试者于2024年6月至2024年10月连续入组,分为三组:1组,糖尿病周围神经病变伴溃疡;II组为无周围神经病变的2型糖尿病;第三组是对照组。所有参与者都进行了常规的胫骨神经超声检查,然后进行了超分辨率超声检查和静脉微泡注射。沿胫神经手动划定感兴趣的区域。定量参数包括束间和束内血管比例、复杂性、密度、流速、灌注指数和单血管曲率,采用单向方差分析(参数)和dunn校正的Kruskal-Wallis检验(非参数)进行比较。结果共纳入100例受试者,其中ⅰ组30例(平均年龄67岁±10 [SD],男性23例),ⅱ组35例(平均年龄61岁±11例,男性20例),ⅲ组35例(平均年龄54岁±14例,男性15例)。超分辨率超声显示,I组血管比(23% vs 10% vs 6%)、复杂性(1.3 vs 1.2 vs 1.1)、最大密度(25 vs 20 vs 12)、平均流速(12.6 vs 8.7 vs 8.4 mm/sec)、灌注指数(4.5 vs 1.4 vs 0.9)和曲率(1.19 vs 1.09 vs 1.05)分别高于II组和III组(均P < 0.05)。I、II、III组患者微血管扭曲发生率分别为83%(25 / 30)、43%(15 / 35)、14% (5 / 35)(P < 0.001)。结论超分辨率US提供了10 μm尺度的胫骨神经微血管结构分辨率视图,有助于识别糖尿病周围神经病变伴溃疡患者的微血管改变。©RSNA, 2026本文提供补充材料。
{"title":"Evaluation of Tibial Nerve Microcirculation in Diabetes Mellitus at Superresolution US.","authors":"Fang Liu, ShuJun Xia, Qing Hua, CongCong Yuan, YuHang Zheng, RuoLin Tao, JiaLe Xu, YuLu Zhang, FangGang Wu, Wei Guo, Yuan Tian, YiJie Dong, JianQiao Zhou","doi":"10.1148/radiol.250347","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.250347","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Dysfunction of the peripheral nerve microcirculation is crucial in the onset and progression of diabetic neuropathy. Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of superresolution US for quantifying tibial nerve microvasculature in diabetic adults with and without peripheral neuropathy, and in control participants. Materials and Methods In this prospective single-center study, consecutive participants were enrolled between June 2024 and October 2024 and divided into three groups: group I, diabetic peripheral neuropathy with ulcers; group II, type 2 diabetes without peripheral neuropathy; and group III, the control group. All participants underwent conventional US in the tibial nerves followed by superresolution US with intravenous microbubble injection. Regions of interest were delineated manually along the tibial nerve. Quantitative parameters, including interfascicular and intrafascicular vessel ratio, complexity, density, velocity, perfusion index, and single-vessel curvature were compared using one-way analysis of variance (parametric) and Dunn-corrected Kruskal-Wallis (nonparametric) tests. Results A total of 100 participants were enrolled, including 30 participants in group I (mean age, 67 years ± 10 [SD]; 23 men), 35 in group II (mean age, 61 years ± 11; 20 men), and 35 in group III (mean age, 54 years ± 14; 15 men). Superresolution US showed group I had higher vessel ratio (23% vs 10% vs 6%), complexity level (1.3 vs 1.2 vs 1.1), maximum density (25 vs 20 vs 12), mean velocity (12.6 vs 8.7 vs 8.4 mm/sec), perfusion index (4.5 vs 1.4 vs 0.9), and curvature (1.19 vs 1.09 vs 1.05) compared with groups II and III, respectively (all <i>P</i> < .05). Microvascular tortuosity was observed in 83% (25 of 30), 43% (15 of 35), and 14% (five of 35) of groups I, II, and III, respectively (<i>P</i> < .001). Conclusion Superresolution US provided a 10-μm scale resolution view of tibial nerve microvascular structure, helping to identify microvascular alterations in participants with diabetic peripheral neuropathy with ulcers. © RSNA, 2026 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"318 1","pages":"e250347"},"PeriodicalIF":15.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146012151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimizing Large Language Models for Automated Protocoling of Abdominal and Pelvic CT Scans: The Power of Context. 优化腹部和骨盆CT扫描自动协议的大型语言模型:上下文的力量。
IF 19.7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.252105
Bryan W Buckley,Adriano B Dias,Yangqing Deng,Heidi Schmidt,Ania Kielar,Satheesh Krishna,Rajesh Bhayana
Background Accurate protocoling is critical for imaging accuracy. Manual protocoling is time-consuming and error prone. Purpose To evaluate the performance of large language models (LLMs) in automatically assigning protocols for abdominal and pelvic CT scans after optimization with context engineering and fine-tuning and to compare performance with that of radiologists in practice. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients with abdominal or pelvic CT scans obtained between January 2024 and June 2024. Requisition data, human-selected protocol, and training level (resident, fellow, or radiologist) were extracted. Reference standard protocols were defined by radiologists in consultation with institutional guidelines. Context engineering involved detailed prompt instructions using a prompt set with GPT-4o (version 2024-08-06; Open AI). A subset of patients was reserved for fine-tuning (training set and validation set) and another for testing (internal test set). Two models were tested (prompting-only and fine-tuned). Model-selected protocols and original human-selected protocols were categorized compared with the reference standard after review by blinded radiologists as follows: exact match, equal alternative, reasonable but inferior, or inappropriate. Exact match and equal alternative were considered optimal. Performance of models and radiologists were compared using the McNemar test. Results This study included 1448 patients (mean age, 61 years ± 17 [SD]; 728 female patients). GPT-4o with prompting only selected optimal protocols more frequently than humans (96.2% [527 of 548 patients] vs 88.3% [484 of 548 patients]; P < .001), but there was no evidence of a difference in inappropriate protocols (1.3% [seven of 548 patients] vs 2.4% [13 of 548 patients]; P = .21). Fine-tuning GPT-4o did not improve the proportion of optimal protocols over prompting only (96.2% [527 of 548 patients] vs 96.2% [527 of 548 patients]; P > .99). In subgroup analyses, the proportion of protocols matching the reference standard was similar among radiologists (79.4% [173 of 218 patients]), fellows (74.9% [164 of 219 patients]), and residents (72.1% [80 of 111 patients]; P = .30). Conclusion For protocoling abdominal and pelvic CT scans, the LLM, GPT-4o, selected optimal protocols more frequently than radiologists when optimized with detailed prompting, and fine-tuning of the model did not further improve performance. © RSNA, 2026 Supplemental material is available for this article.
准确的协议是成像精度的关键。手动协议处理既耗时又容易出错。目的评估大型语言模型(LLMs)在经过上下文工程和微调优化后自动分配腹部和骨盆CT扫描方案的性能,并将其与放射科医生在实践中的性能进行比较。材料和方法本回顾性研究纳入了2024年1月至2024年6月期间进行腹部或骨盆CT扫描的患者。提取了申请数据、人为选择的方案和培训水平(住院医师、研究员或放射科医生)。参考标准方案由放射科医生在咨询机构指南后确定。上下文工程涉及使用gpt - 40(版本2024-08-06;Open AI)的提示集的详细提示说明。保留一部分患者用于微调(训练集和验证集),另一部分用于测试(内部测试集)。测试了两个模型(仅提示和微调)。经盲法放射科医师评审后,将模型选择方案和原始人工选择方案与参考标准进行分类:完全匹配、同等替代、合理但较差、不合适。精确匹配和相等选择是最优选择。使用McNemar测试比较模型和放射科医生的表现。结果共纳入1448例患者,平均年龄61岁±17岁[SD],女性728例。提示的gpt - 40只比人类更频繁地选择最佳方案(96.2%[527 / 548例患者]vs 88.3%[484 / 548例患者];P < .001),但没有证据表明不适当方案的差异(1.3%[7 / 548例患者]vs 2.4%[13 / 548例患者];P = .21)。与提示相比,微调gpt - 40并没有提高最佳方案的比例(96.2%[548例患者中的527例]vs 96.2%[548例患者中的527例];P < 0.05)。在亚组分析中,符合参考标准的方案比例在放射科医师(79.4%[218例患者中的173例])、研究员(74.9%[219例患者中的164例])和住院医师(72.1%[111例患者中的80例];P = 0.30)中相似。对于腹部和骨盆CT扫描的方案,在详细的优化提示下,LLM gpt - 40比放射科医生更频繁地选择最佳方案,并且模型的微调并没有进一步提高性能。©RSNA, 2026本文提供补充材料。
{"title":"Optimizing Large Language Models for Automated Protocoling of Abdominal and Pelvic CT Scans: The Power of Context.","authors":"Bryan W Buckley,Adriano B Dias,Yangqing Deng,Heidi Schmidt,Ania Kielar,Satheesh Krishna,Rajesh Bhayana","doi":"10.1148/radiol.252105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.252105","url":null,"abstract":"Background Accurate protocoling is critical for imaging accuracy. Manual protocoling is time-consuming and error prone. Purpose To evaluate the performance of large language models (LLMs) in automatically assigning protocols for abdominal and pelvic CT scans after optimization with context engineering and fine-tuning and to compare performance with that of radiologists in practice. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients with abdominal or pelvic CT scans obtained between January 2024 and June 2024. Requisition data, human-selected protocol, and training level (resident, fellow, or radiologist) were extracted. Reference standard protocols were defined by radiologists in consultation with institutional guidelines. Context engineering involved detailed prompt instructions using a prompt set with GPT-4o (version 2024-08-06; Open AI). A subset of patients was reserved for fine-tuning (training set and validation set) and another for testing (internal test set). Two models were tested (prompting-only and fine-tuned). Model-selected protocols and original human-selected protocols were categorized compared with the reference standard after review by blinded radiologists as follows: exact match, equal alternative, reasonable but inferior, or inappropriate. Exact match and equal alternative were considered optimal. Performance of models and radiologists were compared using the McNemar test. Results This study included 1448 patients (mean age, 61 years ± 17 [SD]; 728 female patients). GPT-4o with prompting only selected optimal protocols more frequently than humans (96.2% [527 of 548 patients] vs 88.3% [484 of 548 patients]; P < .001), but there was no evidence of a difference in inappropriate protocols (1.3% [seven of 548 patients] vs 2.4% [13 of 548 patients]; P = .21). Fine-tuning GPT-4o did not improve the proportion of optimal protocols over prompting only (96.2% [527 of 548 patients] vs 96.2% [527 of 548 patients]; P > .99). In subgroup analyses, the proportion of protocols matching the reference standard was similar among radiologists (79.4% [173 of 218 patients]), fellows (74.9% [164 of 219 patients]), and residents (72.1% [80 of 111 patients]; P = .30). Conclusion For protocoling abdominal and pelvic CT scans, the LLM, GPT-4o, selected optimal protocols more frequently than radiologists when optimized with detailed prompting, and fine-tuning of the model did not further improve performance. © RSNA, 2026 Supplemental material is available for this article.","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"84 1","pages":"e252105"},"PeriodicalIF":19.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145907544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical Guidelines and Their Role in Trauma-related Cervical Spine Imaging. 临床指南及其在创伤相关颈椎影像学中的作用。
IF 19.7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.252327
Masis Isikbay,Jason Talbott
{"title":"Clinical Guidelines and Their Role in Trauma-related Cervical Spine Imaging.","authors":"Masis Isikbay,Jason Talbott","doi":"10.1148/radiol.252327","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.252327","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"125 1","pages":"e252327"},"PeriodicalIF":19.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145907556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How I Do It: Using the Dixon Method and Fat-Water Imaging in Musculoskeletal MRI. 我是怎么做的:在肌肉骨骼MRI中使用Dixon方法和脂肪-水成像。
IF 15.2 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.250374
Patrick Omoumi, Charbel Mourad, Stanislas Rapacchi, Maxime Pastor

The Dixon method is a fat suppression method based on the separation of fat and water signals. Originally limited to gradient-echo sequences, it can now be integrated with fast/turbo spin-echo MRI sequences, unlocking its potential for musculoskeletal imaging. Key advantages include robust fat suppression and the ability to generate four image contrasts from a single acquisition-including fat-only images, which are specific to the signal of fat-thereby providing opportunities for protocol optimization. Additionally, quantitative data readily available from Dixon sequences provide information on intralesional fat, which may serve as a diagnostic aid complementing the morphologic assessment. The Dixon method has been increasingly used in musculoskeletal MRI, primarily in bone marrow imaging to help detect and characterize focal marrow lesions, vertebral compression fractures, and degenerative spine conditions. Other applications include whole-body imaging, imaging of rheumatologic and neuromuscular disorders, tumor characterization, and imaging near metallic implants. Limitations include fat-water swapping artifacts and unreliable fat quantification (eg, when mineralization is increased). This article covers the strengths, applications, and limitations of the Dixon method in musculoskeletal MRI, with practical tips for incorporating this method into routine protocols, highlighting its most effective applications and noting areas where it is less reliable.

Dixon法是一种基于脂肪和水信号分离的脂肪抑制方法。它最初仅限于梯度回波序列,现在可以与快速/涡轮自旋回波MRI序列集成,释放其在肌肉骨骼成像方面的潜力。主要优点包括强大的脂肪抑制和从单个采集生成四个图像对比的能力——包括脂肪图像,这是特定于脂肪信号的——从而为方案优化提供了机会。此外,从Dixon序列中获得的定量数据提供了关于病灶内脂肪的信息,可以作为形态学评估的诊断辅助。Dixon方法越来越多地用于肌肉骨骼MRI,主要用于骨髓成像,以帮助检测和表征局灶性骨髓病变、椎体压缩性骨折和脊柱退行性疾病。其他应用包括全身成像、风湿病和神经肌肉疾病的成像、肿瘤表征和金属植入物附近的成像。限制包括脂肪-水交换产物和不可靠的脂肪量化(例如,当矿化增加时)。本文介绍了Dixon方法在肌肉骨骼MRI中的优势、应用和局限性,以及将该方法纳入常规方案的实用技巧,强调了其最有效的应用,并指出了其不太可靠的领域。
{"title":"How I Do It: Using the Dixon Method and Fat-Water Imaging in Musculoskeletal MRI.","authors":"Patrick Omoumi, Charbel Mourad, Stanislas Rapacchi, Maxime Pastor","doi":"10.1148/radiol.250374","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.250374","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Dixon method is a fat suppression method based on the separation of fat and water signals. Originally limited to gradient-echo sequences, it can now be integrated with fast/turbo spin-echo MRI sequences, unlocking its potential for musculoskeletal imaging. Key advantages include robust fat suppression and the ability to generate four image contrasts from a single acquisition-including fat-only images, which are specific to the signal of fat-thereby providing opportunities for protocol optimization. Additionally, quantitative data readily available from Dixon sequences provide information on intralesional fat, which may serve as a diagnostic aid complementing the morphologic assessment. The Dixon method has been increasingly used in musculoskeletal MRI, primarily in bone marrow imaging to help detect and characterize focal marrow lesions, vertebral compression fractures, and degenerative spine conditions. Other applications include whole-body imaging, imaging of rheumatologic and neuromuscular disorders, tumor characterization, and imaging near metallic implants. Limitations include fat-water swapping artifacts and unreliable fat quantification (eg, when mineralization is increased). This article covers the strengths, applications, and limitations of the Dixon method in musculoskeletal MRI, with practical tips for incorporating this method into routine protocols, highlighting its most effective applications and noting areas where it is less reliable.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"318 1","pages":"e250374"},"PeriodicalIF":15.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146012149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Subdural Hematoma: CT/MRI End Points of the EMBOLISE Trial. 脑膜中动脉栓塞治疗硬膜下血肿:栓塞试验的CT/MRI终点。
IF 15.2 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.251746
Helge Kniep, Susanne Gellissen, Matthias Bechstein, Lukas Meyer, Gabriel Broocks, Christian Heitkamp, Laurens Winkelmeier, Fabian Flottmann, Vincent Geest, Uta Hanning, Christian Thaler, Maxim Bester, Jason M Davies, Jared Knopman, Maxim Mokin, Ameer E Hassan, Robert E Harbaugh, Alexander Khalessi, Adnan H Siddiqui, Bradley A Gross, Ramesh Grandhi, Jason Tarpley, Walavan Sivakumar, Mark Bain, R Webster Crowley, Thomas W Link, Justin F Fraser, Michael R Levitt, Peng Roc Chen, Ricardo A Hanel, Joe D Bernard, Mouhammad Jumaa, Patrick Youssef, Marshall C Cress, Mohammad Imran Chaudry, Hakeem J Shakir, Walter S Lesley, Joshua Billingsley, Jesse Jones, Matthew J Koch, Alexandra R Paul, William J Mack, Joshua W Osbun, Kathleen Dlouhy, Jonathan A Grossberg, Christopher P Kellner, Daniel H Sahlein, Justin Santarelli, Clemens M Schirmer, Justin Singer, Jesse J Liu, Aniel Q Majjhoo, Thomas Wolfe, Neil V Patel, Christopher Roark, Jens Fiehler

Background Chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs) are associated with high recurrence risks following surgical evacuation. The EMBOLISE trial demonstrated that, compared with surgery alone, adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) significantly reduced reoperation rates. However, given the limitations of the clinical end points of the trial, which may be subject to interrater variability and certain biases, the quantitative imaging metrics need to be evaluated. Purpose To evaluate the prespecified imaging end points of the EMBOLISE trial and assess the long-term resolution of cSDH through quantitative imaging analyses. Materials and Methods EMBOLISE was a multicenter, randomized, interventional trial conducted across 39 U.S. sites between December 2020 and August 2023. Prespecified secondary imaging end points included changes in hematoma volume and thickness and midline shifts from 24 hours to 90 days after the procedure at CT and MRI. The post hoc analyses performed herein extended the assessment to 180 days and included absolute hematoma metrics. Mixed-effects modeling was employed to adjust for confounders. Results Four hundred patients were enrolled in the EMBOLISE study, among whom 352 were included (mean age, 72 years ± 10.4 [SD]; 256 men). The mean cSDH volume was 126 mL at screening, with no intergroup differences. At 90 and 180 days, the MMAE plus surgery group had lower cSDH volumes (20.6 mL vs 28.9 mL [P = .03] and 19.4 mL vs 31.5 mL [P = .04], respectively). Mixed-effects models revealed a 6.9 mL (95% CI: -13.5, -0.40; approximately 25%) greater volume reduction and an 8.4 mL (95% CI: -15.2, -1.6; approximately 30%) lower absolute volume at 90 days in the MMAE group There was no evidence of a difference in the prespecified secondary imaging end points between the groups. Conclusion While the prespecified secondary imaging end points did not significantly differ, the absolute 90- and 180-day hematoma volumes were significantly lower in patients who received MMAE and surgery. Confounder-adjusted mixed-effects analysis indicated a greater reduction in hematoma volume with adjunctive MMAE. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04402632 © RSNA, 2026 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Ramasamy and Baker in this issue.

背景:慢性硬膜下血肿(cSDHs)与手术后高复发风险相关。栓塞试验表明,与单纯手术相比,辅助脑膜中动脉栓塞(MMAE)显著降低了再手术率。然而,考虑到试验临床终点的局限性,这可能会受到相互变异性和某些偏差的影响,需要对定量成像指标进行评估。目的通过定量影像学分析,评价栓塞试验预先设定的影像学终点,评估cSDH的长期分辨率。栓塞是一项多中心、随机、介入性试验,于2020年12月至2023年8月在美国39个地点进行。预先指定的二次成像终点包括术后24小时至90天的CT和MRI血肿体积、厚度和中线移动的变化。本文进行的事后分析将评估延长至180天,并包括绝对血肿指标。采用混合效应模型来调整混杂因素。结果栓塞研究共纳入400例患者,其中352例(平均年龄72岁±10.4 [SD];男性256例)。筛查时cSDH平均体积为126 mL,组间无差异。在90天和180天,MMAE加手术组cSDH体积较低(分别为20.6 mL对28.9 mL [P = .03]和19.4 mL对31.5 mL [P = .04])。混合效应模型显示,MMAE组在90天的体积减少6.9 mL (95% CI: -13.5, -0.40;约25%),绝对体积减少8.4 mL (95% CI: -15.2, -1.6;约30%)。两组之间预先指定的二次成像终点没有证据表明差异。结论虽然预先指定的二次成像终点没有显著差异,但接受MMAE和手术的患者90天和180天的绝对血肿体积明显降低。混杂因素调整后的混合效应分析表明,辅助MMAE能更大程度地减少血肿体积。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT04402632©RSNA, 2026本文提供补充材料。参见Ramasamy和Baker在本期的社论。
{"title":"Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Subdural Hematoma: CT/MRI End Points of the EMBOLISE Trial.","authors":"Helge Kniep, Susanne Gellissen, Matthias Bechstein, Lukas Meyer, Gabriel Broocks, Christian Heitkamp, Laurens Winkelmeier, Fabian Flottmann, Vincent Geest, Uta Hanning, Christian Thaler, Maxim Bester, Jason M Davies, Jared Knopman, Maxim Mokin, Ameer E Hassan, Robert E Harbaugh, Alexander Khalessi, Adnan H Siddiqui, Bradley A Gross, Ramesh Grandhi, Jason Tarpley, Walavan Sivakumar, Mark Bain, R Webster Crowley, Thomas W Link, Justin F Fraser, Michael R Levitt, Peng Roc Chen, Ricardo A Hanel, Joe D Bernard, Mouhammad Jumaa, Patrick Youssef, Marshall C Cress, Mohammad Imran Chaudry, Hakeem J Shakir, Walter S Lesley, Joshua Billingsley, Jesse Jones, Matthew J Koch, Alexandra R Paul, William J Mack, Joshua W Osbun, Kathleen Dlouhy, Jonathan A Grossberg, Christopher P Kellner, Daniel H Sahlein, Justin Santarelli, Clemens M Schirmer, Justin Singer, Jesse J Liu, Aniel Q Majjhoo, Thomas Wolfe, Neil V Patel, Christopher Roark, Jens Fiehler","doi":"10.1148/radiol.251746","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.251746","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs) are associated with high recurrence risks following surgical evacuation. The EMBOLISE trial demonstrated that, compared with surgery alone, adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) significantly reduced reoperation rates. However, given the limitations of the clinical end points of the trial, which may be subject to interrater variability and certain biases, the quantitative imaging metrics need to be evaluated. Purpose To evaluate the prespecified imaging end points of the EMBOLISE trial and assess the long-term resolution of cSDH through quantitative imaging analyses. Materials and Methods EMBOLISE was a multicenter, randomized, interventional trial conducted across 39 U.S. sites between December 2020 and August 2023. Prespecified secondary imaging end points included changes in hematoma volume and thickness and midline shifts from 24 hours to 90 days after the procedure at CT and MRI. The post hoc analyses performed herein extended the assessment to 180 days and included absolute hematoma metrics. Mixed-effects modeling was employed to adjust for confounders. Results Four hundred patients were enrolled in the EMBOLISE study, among whom 352 were included (mean age, 72 years ± 10.4 [SD]; 256 men). The mean cSDH volume was 126 mL at screening, with no intergroup differences. At 90 and 180 days, the MMAE plus surgery group had lower cSDH volumes (20.6 mL vs 28.9 mL [<i>P</i> = .03] and 19.4 mL vs 31.5 mL [<i>P</i> = .04], respectively). Mixed-effects models revealed a 6.9 mL (95% CI: -13.5, -0.40; approximately 25%) greater volume reduction and an 8.4 mL (95% CI: -15.2, -1.6; approximately 30%) lower absolute volume at 90 days in the MMAE group There was no evidence of a difference in the prespecified secondary imaging end points between the groups. Conclusion While the prespecified secondary imaging end points did not significantly differ, the absolute 90- and 180-day hematoma volumes were significantly lower in patients who received MMAE and surgery. Confounder-adjusted mixed-effects analysis indicated a greater reduction in hematoma volume with adjunctive MMAE. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04402632 © RSNA, 2026 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Ramasamy and Baker in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"318 1","pages":"e251746"},"PeriodicalIF":15.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146053558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance under American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Version 2023 Guidance. 根据美国肝病研究协会2023版指南对肝细胞癌监测的前瞻性多中心评估
IF 15.2 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.252252
Mei-Qing Cheng, Hang-Tong Hu, Shao-Hong Wu, Hui Huang, Ya-Dan Lin, Wen-Juan Tong, Xiao-Zhou Lu, Wei-Ping Ke, Rui-Fang Lu, Qian-Qian Xu, Yu Wang, Xin-Xin Lin, Ze-Zhi Liu, Zhi-Rong Lu, Ming-De Lu, Hong Yang, Wei Wang, Li-Da Chen

Background The 2023 update of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD version 2023 [hereafter, v2023]) guidance introduced new triggers for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance, incorporating US visualization score, increasing α-fetoprotein (AFP) level, and lesion growth, but has not yet been validated. Purpose To assess the surveillance performance of AASLD v2023 for HCC detection in comparison to Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2017 (hereafter, v2017) and AASLD version 2018 (hereafter, v2018) in participants at high risk of HCC. Materials and Methods This prospective study consecutively enrolled high-risk participants undergoing US and AFP surveillance across three institutions between July 2023 and October 2024. Surveillance performance of US LI-RADS v2017, AASLD v2018, and AASLD v2023 for HCC detection was compared through sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV). Multivariable logistic regression helped identify predictors of false-negative and false-positive classifications. Results Among 953 participants (median age, 51 years; IQR, 45-58 years; 658 men), 5% (50 of 953) had HCC. The new surveillance triggers (visualization score VIS-C, increasing AFP level, and lesion growth) demonstrated sensitivities ranging from 8% (four of 50 participants) to 48% (24 of 50 participants), with high specificities of 94% (849 of 903 participants) to 99.4% (898 of 903 participants). As an integrated algorithm, AASLD v2023 achieved a sensitivity of 94% (47 of 50 participants) and NPV of 99.6% (758 of 761 participants) for HCC detection, surpassing US LI-RADS v2017 (sensitivity, 60% [30 of 50 participants], P < .001; NPV, 98% [814 of 834 participants], P = .001) and AASLD v2018 (sensitivity, 76% [38 of 50 participants], P = .02; NPV, 98.5% [805 of 817 participants], P = .04). Specificity was lower than that with US LI-RADS v2017 (84% [758 of 903 participants] vs 90% [814 of 903 participants], P < .001) and AASLD v2018 (84% [758 of 903 participants] vs 89% [805 of 903 participants], P = .001). For early HCC, sensitivity remained superior to that of other algorithms (P < .001, P = .04). At multivariable analysis, AFP level of less than 20 ng/mL (odds ratio, 11.76; P < .001) and absence of cirrhosis (odds ratio, 2.45; P = .03) were independently associated with false-positive findings for AASLD v2023. Conclusion AASLD v2023 improved the sensitivity and NPV for HCC surveillance, outperforming US LI-RADS v2017 and AASLD v2018. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry no. ChiCTR2100054330 © RSNA, 2026 Supplemental material is available for this article.

美国肝脏疾病研究协会(AASLD) 2023版(以下简称v2023)指南于2023年更新,引入了肝细胞癌(HCC)监测的新触发因素,包括US可视化评分、α-胎蛋白(AFP)水平升高和病变生长,但尚未得到验证。目的比较AASLD v2023与肝成像报告与数据系统(LI-RADS) 2017版(以下简称v2017)和AASLD 2018版(以下简称v2018)对高危人群HCC检测的监测效果。材料和方法本前瞻性研究于2023年7月至2024年10月在三个机构连续招募接受美国和AFP监测的高风险参与者。比较美国LI-RADS v2017、AASLD v2018和AASLD v2023检测HCC的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值(NPV)。多变量逻辑回归有助于识别假阴性和假阳性分类的预测因子。在953名参与者中(中位年龄51岁;IQR, 45-58岁;658名男性),5%(953人中50人)患有HCC。新的监测触发器(可视化评分VIS-C, AFP水平增加和病变生长)显示敏感性从8%(50名参与者中的4名)到48%(50名参与者中的24名),高特异性为94%(903名参与者中的849名)到99.4%(903名参与者中的898名)。作为一种综合算法,AASLD v2023对HCC的检测灵敏度为94%(50名参与者中的47名),NPV为99.6%(761名参与者中的758名),超过了美国LI-RADS v2017(灵敏度为60%[50名参与者中的30名],P < 0.001; NPV为98%[834名参与者中的814名],P = 0.001)和AASLD v2018(灵敏度为76%[50名参与者中的38名],P = .02; NPV为98.5%[817名参与者中的805名],P = .04)。特异性低于美国LI-RADS v2017 (84% [758 / 903] vs 90% [814 / 903], P < 0.001)和AASLD v2018 (84% [758 / 903] vs 89% [805 / 903], P = 0.001)。对于早期HCC,敏感性仍优于其他算法(P < .001, P = .04)。在多变量分析中,AFP水平低于20 ng/mL(优势比11.76,P < 0.001)和无肝硬化(优势比2.45,P = 0.03)与AASLD v2023的假阳性结果独立相关。结论AASLD v2023提高了HCC监测的敏感性和NPV,优于美国LI-RADS v2017和AASLD v2018。中国临床试验注册号:ChiCTR2100054330©RSNA, 2026本文有补充材料。
{"title":"Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance under American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Version 2023 Guidance.","authors":"Mei-Qing Cheng, Hang-Tong Hu, Shao-Hong Wu, Hui Huang, Ya-Dan Lin, Wen-Juan Tong, Xiao-Zhou Lu, Wei-Ping Ke, Rui-Fang Lu, Qian-Qian Xu, Yu Wang, Xin-Xin Lin, Ze-Zhi Liu, Zhi-Rong Lu, Ming-De Lu, Hong Yang, Wei Wang, Li-Da Chen","doi":"10.1148/radiol.252252","DOIUrl":"10.1148/radiol.252252","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background The 2023 update of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD version 2023 [hereafter, v2023]) guidance introduced new triggers for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance, incorporating US visualization score, increasing α-fetoprotein (AFP) level, and lesion growth, but has not yet been validated. Purpose To assess the surveillance performance of AASLD v2023 for HCC detection in comparison to Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2017 (hereafter, v2017) and AASLD version 2018 (hereafter, v2018) in participants at high risk of HCC. Materials and Methods This prospective study consecutively enrolled high-risk participants undergoing US and AFP surveillance across three institutions between July 2023 and October 2024. Surveillance performance of US LI-RADS v2017, AASLD v2018, and AASLD v2023 for HCC detection was compared through sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV). Multivariable logistic regression helped identify predictors of false-negative and false-positive classifications. Results Among 953 participants (median age, 51 years; IQR, 45-58 years; 658 men), 5% (50 of 953) had HCC. The new surveillance triggers (visualization score VIS-C, increasing AFP level, and lesion growth) demonstrated sensitivities ranging from 8% (four of 50 participants) to 48% (24 of 50 participants), with high specificities of 94% (849 of 903 participants) to 99.4% (898 of 903 participants). As an integrated algorithm, AASLD v2023 achieved a sensitivity of 94% (47 of 50 participants) and NPV of 99.6% (758 of 761 participants) for HCC detection, surpassing US LI-RADS v2017 (sensitivity, 60% [30 of 50 participants], <i>P</i> < .001; NPV, 98% [814 of 834 participants], <i>P</i> = .001) and AASLD v2018 (sensitivity, 76% [38 of 50 participants], <i>P</i> = .02; NPV, 98.5% [805 of 817 participants], <i>P</i> = .04). Specificity was lower than that with US LI-RADS v2017 (84% [758 of 903 participants] vs 90% [814 of 903 participants], <i>P</i> < .001) and AASLD v2018 (84% [758 of 903 participants] vs 89% [805 of 903 participants], <i>P</i> = .001). For early HCC, sensitivity remained superior to that of other algorithms (<i>P</i> < .001, <i>P</i> = .04). At multivariable analysis, AFP level of less than 20 ng/mL (odds ratio, 11.76; <i>P</i> < .001) and absence of cirrhosis (odds ratio, 2.45; <i>P</i> = .03) were independently associated with false-positive findings for AASLD v2023. Conclusion AASLD v2023 improved the sensitivity and NPV for HCC surveillance, outperforming US LI-RADS v2017 and AASLD v2018. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry no. ChiCTR2100054330 © RSNA, 2026 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"318 1","pages":"e252252"},"PeriodicalIF":15.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146012185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ensuring Sound Human-AI Collaboration through Uncertainty Indicators. 通过不确定性指标确保良好的人类与人工智能协作。
IF 15.2 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.252631
Seong Ho Park
{"title":"Ensuring Sound Human-AI Collaboration through Uncertainty Indicators.","authors":"Seong Ho Park","doi":"10.1148/radiol.252631","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.252631","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"318 1","pages":"e252631"},"PeriodicalIF":15.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145960112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Radiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1