首页 > 最新文献

Radiology最新文献

英文 中文
The Safety Standards for Liver Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: A Meta-Analysis of Adverse Events over 15 Years. 肝脏经皮热消融的安全标准:15年不良事件荟萃分析。
IF 15.2 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.251517
Gary Doppelt, Bob-Valéry Occéan, Pascale Fabbro-Peray, Laura Haefliger, Laurène Tardieu, Valentina Schembri, Chloé Minier, Margaux Hermida, Marie Ange Pierredon Foulongne, Ali Belgour, Julien Frandon, Laure Escal, Carole Allimant, Lauranne Piron, Boris Guiu

Background Percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA), including radiofrequency and microwave ablation, has been established as a curative therapy for small malignant liver neoplasms; yet, as clinical indications expand, overall safety remains good, although the exact incidence of complications varies among studies. Purpose To determine updated benchmarks for procedure-related mortality and major adverse events (AEs) after PTA of malignant liver tumors. Materials and Methods In this systematic review and single-proportion meta-analysis of patients who underwent thermal ablation of malignant liver tumors, Cochrane, MEDLINE, and Embase were searched for prospective randomized or cohort studies published from January 2007 to September 2022 that reported AEs after radiofrequency or microwave ablation of three or fewer liver tumors measuring 5 cm or smaller, over at least 90 days of follow-up. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Pooled proportions of significant AEs (ie, Society of Interventional Radiology grades C-E), including 90-day procedure-related mortality, were calculated with random-effects models. Results Forty-nine studies comprising 4149 patients and 4636 ablations met the inclusion criteria. The pooled proportion of significant AEs was 3.0% (86 of 3149 patients; 95% CI: 2.50, 3.67; I2 = 0%). The 90-day procedure-related mortality rate was 0.01% (one of 4149 patients; 95% CI: 0.007, 0.014). The AE rates did not differ significantly between radiofrequency and microwave ablation (3.21% vs 2.65%; P = .41) or between hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic tumors (2.94% vs 3.91%; P = .85). Conclusion PTA of malignant liver tumors is associated with near-zero 90-day mortality and a 3% major complication rate. © RSNA, 2026 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Bettmann in this issue.

背景:经皮热消融(PTA),包括射频和微波消融,已被确定为治疗小型恶性肝脏肿瘤的有效方法;然而,随着临床适应症的扩大,总体安全性仍然良好,尽管并发症的确切发生率在不同的研究中有所不同。目的确定恶性肝肿瘤PTA术后手术相关死亡率和主要不良事件(ae)的最新基准。材料和方法在这项系统综述和单比例荟萃分析中,检索了2007年1月至2022年9月发表的前瞻性随机或队列研究,这些研究报告了射频或微波消融3个或更少的5厘米或更小的肝肿瘤后的ae,随访时间至少为90天。两名审稿人独立筛选研究、提取数据并评估偏倚风险。采用随机效应模型计算显著ae(即介入放射学会分级C-E级)的合并比例,包括90天手术相关死亡率。结果49项研究,4149例患者,4636例消融符合纳入标准。显著ae合并比例为3.0%(3149例患者中有86例;95% CI: 2.50, 3.67; I2 = 0%)。90天手术相关死亡率为0.01%(4149例患者中的1例;95% CI: 0.007, 0.014)。射频消融与微波消融的AE发生率无显著差异(3.21% vs 2.65%, P = 0.41),肝细胞癌与转移性肿瘤的AE发生率无显著差异(2.94% vs 3.91%, P = 0.85)。结论PTA与恶性肝肿瘤的90天死亡率接近零,主要并发症发生率为3%。©RSNA, 2026本文提供补充材料。参见Bettmann在本期的社论。
{"title":"The Safety Standards for Liver Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: A Meta-Analysis of Adverse Events over 15 Years.","authors":"Gary Doppelt, Bob-Valéry Occéan, Pascale Fabbro-Peray, Laura Haefliger, Laurène Tardieu, Valentina Schembri, Chloé Minier, Margaux Hermida, Marie Ange Pierredon Foulongne, Ali Belgour, Julien Frandon, Laure Escal, Carole Allimant, Lauranne Piron, Boris Guiu","doi":"10.1148/radiol.251517","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.251517","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA), including radiofrequency and microwave ablation, has been established as a curative therapy for small malignant liver neoplasms; yet, as clinical indications expand, overall safety remains good, although the exact incidence of complications varies among studies. Purpose To determine updated benchmarks for procedure-related mortality and major adverse events (AEs) after PTA of malignant liver tumors. Materials and Methods In this systematic review and single-proportion meta-analysis of patients who underwent thermal ablation of malignant liver tumors, Cochrane, MEDLINE, and Embase were searched for prospective randomized or cohort studies published from January 2007 to September 2022 that reported AEs after radiofrequency or microwave ablation of three or fewer liver tumors measuring 5 cm or smaller, over at least 90 days of follow-up. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Pooled proportions of significant AEs (ie, Society of Interventional Radiology grades C-E), including 90-day procedure-related mortality, were calculated with random-effects models. Results Forty-nine studies comprising 4149 patients and 4636 ablations met the inclusion criteria. The pooled proportion of significant AEs was 3.0% (86 of 3149 patients; 95% CI: 2.50, 3.67; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%). The 90-day procedure-related mortality rate was 0.01% (one of 4149 patients; 95% CI: 0.007, 0.014). The AE rates did not differ significantly between radiofrequency and microwave ablation (3.21% vs 2.65%; <i>P</i> = .41) or between hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic tumors (2.94% vs 3.91%; <i>P</i> = .85). Conclusion PTA of malignant liver tumors is associated with near-zero 90-day mortality and a 3% major complication rate. © RSNA, 2026 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Bettmann in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"318 3","pages":"e251517"},"PeriodicalIF":15.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147504750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Microwave Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastases: If Your Margin Is Less than 10 mm, Your Intention Is Not Curative. 微波消融治疗结直肠肝转移瘤:如果切缘小于10mm,你的目的不是治愈。
IF 15.2 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.260355
Christos S Georgiades
{"title":"Microwave Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastases: If Your Margin Is Less than 10 mm, Your Intention Is Not Curative.","authors":"Christos S Georgiades","doi":"10.1148/radiol.260355","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.260355","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"318 3","pages":"e260355"},"PeriodicalIF":15.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147504774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Malignant Transformation of the Undescended Testis. 隐睾的恶性转化。
IF 15.2 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.252810
Jiao Du, Qingyu Ji
{"title":"Malignant Transformation of the Undescended Testis.","authors":"Jiao Du, Qingyu Ji","doi":"10.1148/radiol.252810","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.252810","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"318 2","pages":"e252810"},"PeriodicalIF":15.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147285111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Incidental Adnexal Lesions: CT Diagnosis and Interreader Agreement. 附带附件病变:CT诊断与解读者一致。
IF 15.2 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.243477
Yang Guo, Elizabeth A Sadowski, Zhou Lan, Nancy Kim, Xiaoyang Liu, Ekta Maheshwari, Stéphanie Nougaret, Krupa K Patel-Lippmann, Melina Pectasides, Lauren A Roller, Luyao Shen, Shaun A Wahab, Katherine E Maturen, Atul B Shinagare

Background The management of incidental adnexal lesions encountered at CT depends on the diagnosis, but little evidence supports CT diagnosis of most adnexal lesion types. Purpose To evaluate the interreader agreement and CT diagnosis of incidentally discovered adnexal lesions. Materials and Methods This institutional review board-approved, multi-institutional, multireader retrospective study conducted from January 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023, included patients who had malignant ovarian lesions with metastases (n = 8) and without metastases (n = 8), simple cysts (n = 6), dermoids (n = 9), hydrosalpinx (n = 5), benign cystadenomas and/or cystadenofibromas (n = 10), hemorrhagic cysts (n = 8), endometriomas (n = 6), ovarian fibromas (n = 5), leiomyomas (n = 5), and peritoneal inclusion cysts (n = 5) detected at CT. Nine members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Uterine and Ovarian Cancer Disease-Focused Panel, blinded to the final diagnosis, independently reviewed the CT images and used the American College of Radiology white paper to determine the most likely diagnosis. A 2 × 2 factorial random-effects model was used to calculate the mean adjusted accuracy and disparity among the readers. Interreader agreement was calculated using a Gwet AC1 test. Results In total, 75 patients (mean age, 50 years ± 16 [SD]) were included. The mean adjusted accuracy and interreader agreement were highest for dermoids (99% and 0.97, respectively), malignant ovarian lesions with metastases (94% and 0.90), and simple cysts (86% and 0.64). The mean adjusted accuracy for all other lesion types was less than 72%, with fair to moderate interreader agreement. Overall, readers more accurately diagnosed malignant lesions (82%) than benign lesions (52%) (P < .001). Readers recorded a benign diagnosis when a malignant lesion was present 28% of the time (20 of 72) (P < .001) when there were no metastases. Conclusion Readers' mean adjusted accuracy was greatest for dermoids, malignant ovarian lesions with metastases, and simple cysts at CT, with substantial to almost perfect interreader agreement; all other lesions were challenging, and a substantial number of malignant ovarian lesions were misdiagnosed as benign. © RSNA, 2026.

背景CT偶发附件病变的处理取决于诊断,但很少有证据支持大多数附件病变类型的CT诊断。目的评价偶然发现的附件病变的解读符合性和CT诊断。材料与方法这个机构审查委员会批准了,多从multireader回顾性研究2022年1月1日至6月30日,2023年,包括患者恶性卵巢病变转移(n = 8)没有转移(n = 8),简单的囊肿(n = 6),皮样的(n = 9),输卵管积水(n = 5),良性囊腺瘤和/或cystadenofibromas (n = 10),出血性囊肿(n = 8),子宫腺肌瘤(n = 6),卵巢纤维瘤(n = 5),平滑肌瘤(n = 5),CT检出腹膜包涵囊肿(n = 5)。腹部放射学会子宫癌和卵巢癌疾病重点小组的九名成员,对最终诊断不知情,独立审查了CT图像,并使用美国放射学会白皮书来确定最可能的诊断。采用2 × 2因子随机效应模型计算平均校正精度和读者间差异。使用Gwet AC1测试计算解读器一致性。结果共纳入75例患者,平均年龄50岁±16岁[SD]。皮样病变(分别为99%和0.97)、卵巢转移恶性病变(分别为94%和0.90)和单纯性囊肿(分别为86%和0.64)的平均校正准确率和解读者一致性最高。所有其他病变类型的平均校正准确率低于72%,与一般到中等程度的解读者一致。总体而言,读者对恶性病变的诊断准确率(82%)高于良性病变(52%)(P < 0.001)。在没有转移的情况下,28%(72人中有20人)出现恶性病变时,读者记录了良性诊断(P < 0.001)。结论:在皮样、卵巢转移恶性病变和单纯性囊肿的CT上,解读器的平均校正准确率最高,基本达到完美;所有其他病变都具有挑战性,并且大量卵巢恶性病变被误诊为良性。©rsna, 2026。
{"title":"Incidental Adnexal Lesions: CT Diagnosis and Interreader Agreement.","authors":"Yang Guo, Elizabeth A Sadowski, Zhou Lan, Nancy Kim, Xiaoyang Liu, Ekta Maheshwari, Stéphanie Nougaret, Krupa K Patel-Lippmann, Melina Pectasides, Lauren A Roller, Luyao Shen, Shaun A Wahab, Katherine E Maturen, Atul B Shinagare","doi":"10.1148/radiol.243477","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.243477","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background The management of incidental adnexal lesions encountered at CT depends on the diagnosis, but little evidence supports CT diagnosis of most adnexal lesion types. Purpose To evaluate the interreader agreement and CT diagnosis of incidentally discovered adnexal lesions. Materials and Methods This institutional review board-approved, multi-institutional, multireader retrospective study conducted from January 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023, included patients who had malignant ovarian lesions with metastases (<i>n</i> = 8) and without metastases (<i>n</i> = 8), simple cysts (<i>n</i> = 6), dermoids (<i>n</i> = 9), hydrosalpinx (<i>n</i> = 5), benign cystadenomas and/or cystadenofibromas (<i>n</i> = 10), hemorrhagic cysts (<i>n</i> = 8), endometriomas (<i>n</i> = 6), ovarian fibromas (<i>n</i> = 5), leiomyomas (<i>n</i> = 5), and peritoneal inclusion cysts (<i>n</i> = 5) detected at CT. Nine members of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Uterine and Ovarian Cancer Disease-Focused Panel, blinded to the final diagnosis, independently reviewed the CT images and used the American College of Radiology white paper to determine the most likely diagnosis. A 2 × 2 factorial random-effects model was used to calculate the mean adjusted accuracy and disparity among the readers. Interreader agreement was calculated using a Gwet AC1 test. Results In total, 75 patients (mean age, 50 years ± 16 [SD]) were included. The mean adjusted accuracy and interreader agreement were highest for dermoids (99% and 0.97, respectively), malignant ovarian lesions with metastases (94% and 0.90), and simple cysts (86% and 0.64). The mean adjusted accuracy for all other lesion types was less than 72%, with fair to moderate interreader agreement. Overall, readers more accurately diagnosed malignant lesions (82%) than benign lesions (52%) (<i>P</i> < .001). Readers recorded a benign diagnosis when a malignant lesion was present 28% of the time (20 of 72) (<i>P</i> < .001) when there were no metastases. Conclusion Readers' mean adjusted accuracy was greatest for dermoids, malignant ovarian lesions with metastases, and simple cysts at CT, with substantial to almost perfect interreader agreement; all other lesions were challenging, and a substantial number of malignant ovarian lesions were misdiagnosed as benign. © RSNA, 2026.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"318 2","pages":"e243477"},"PeriodicalIF":15.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146150553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Photon-counting CT versus Energy-integrating Detector CT in Imaging Lung Cancer. 光子计数CT与能量积分检测器CT在肺癌成像中的对比研究。
IF 15.2 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.251126
Xiaofei Yang, Mingxin Li, Ke Qi, Kehui Nie, Qianqian Zhao, Xiangnan Li, Songwei Yue, Junqiang Dong, Yonggao Zhang, Zhigang Zhou, Jianbo Gao

Background Although energy-integrating detector (EID) CT remains the standard in diagnosing and monitoring lung cancer, it has limitations compared with photon-counting CT (PCCT). However, the role of low-dose PCCT in evaluating lung cancer remains unexplored. Purpose To compare the diagnostic quality of chest CT images from PCCT with a low radiation dose and a low injection rate, volume, and concentration of contrast agent (hereafter, a "quadruple-low protocol") with that of EID CT in patients with lung cancer. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients with lung cancer undergoing PCCT or EID CT between July 2024 and September 2024. Patients underwent PCCT with the low radiation dose plus reduced contrast agent protocol (quadruple-low protocol: 2.0 mL/sec injection rate, 1.0 mL/kg of 320 mg of iodine per milliliter) and EID CT with a conventional protocol. Two radiologists independently evaluated the subjective image quality and lesion imaging features. Lesion and parenchymal metrics (attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio [SNR], and contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) were also assessed. Data were compared using the Student t test, Mann-Whitney U test, or multivariable regression. Sensitivity analysis was performed using propensity score matching. Results Among 425 participants (mean age, 61 years ± 9.5 [SD]; 273 men), PCCT reduced radiation dose by 55% (mean effective dose, 3.49 mSv ± 0.91 vs 7.82 mSv ± 2.15; P < .001) while lowering contrast agent injection rate, volume, and concentration by 33% (P < .001), 22% (P < .001), and 9% (P < .001), respectively. PCCT reduced the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) compared with EID CT (0% [0 of 120] vs 7.9% [24 of 305], P = .02). PCCT also exhibited higher objective SNR and CNR in lung lesions and parenchyma, with superior subjective image quality scores and increased diagnostic confidence for imaging features (all adjusted P < .001). Results remained consistent in sensitivity analysis. Conclusion Compared with EID CT, PCCT with a quadruple-low protocol reduced the incidence of CIN and enhanced image quality and diagnostic confidence in imaging features in patients with lung cancer. © RSNA, 2026 Supplemental material is available for this article.

背景虽然能量积分检测器(EID) CT仍然是肺癌诊断和监测的标准,但与光子计数CT (PCCT)相比,它存在局限性。然而,低剂量PCCT在评估肺癌中的作用仍未被探索。目的比较低放射剂量、低注射速率、低体积、低浓度造影剂(以下简称“四低方案”)的PCCT胸部CT图像与EID CT对肺癌患者的诊断质量。材料与方法本回顾性研究纳入2024年7月至2024年9月期间接受PCCT或EID CT治疗的肺癌患者。患者接受低辐射剂量加减造影剂方案的PCCT(四低方案:2.0 mL/秒注射速率,1.0 mL/kg每毫升320 mg碘)和传统方案的EID CT。两名放射科医生独立评估主观图像质量和病变成像特征。还评估了病变和实质指标(衰减、信噪比[SNR]和对比噪声比[CNR])。使用Student t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验或多变量回归对数据进行比较。采用倾向评分匹配进行敏感性分析。结果在425名参与者中(平均年龄61岁±9.5岁,男性273名),PCCT降低了55%的辐射剂量(平均有效剂量,3.49 mSv±0.91 vs 7.82 mSv±2.15,P < 0.001),同时降低了造影剂的注射率、体积和浓度,分别降低了33% (P < 0.001)、22% (P < 0.001)和9% (P < 0.001)。与EID CT相比,PCCT降低了造影剂肾病(CIN)的发生率(0% [0 / 120]vs 7.9% [24 / 305], P = 0.02)。PCCT在肺病变和实质中也表现出更高的客观信噪比和CNR,具有更高的主观图像质量评分和对影像学特征的诊断置信度(均校正P < 0.001)。敏感性分析结果一致。结论与EID CT相比,四低方案的PCCT降低了肺癌患者CIN的发生率,提高了图像质量和影像学特征的诊断可信度。©RSNA, 2026本文提供补充材料。
{"title":"Photon-counting CT versus Energy-integrating Detector CT in Imaging Lung Cancer.","authors":"Xiaofei Yang, Mingxin Li, Ke Qi, Kehui Nie, Qianqian Zhao, Xiangnan Li, Songwei Yue, Junqiang Dong, Yonggao Zhang, Zhigang Zhou, Jianbo Gao","doi":"10.1148/radiol.251126","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.251126","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Although energy-integrating detector (EID) CT remains the standard in diagnosing and monitoring lung cancer, it has limitations compared with photon-counting CT (PCCT). However, the role of low-dose PCCT in evaluating lung cancer remains unexplored. Purpose To compare the diagnostic quality of chest CT images from PCCT with a low radiation dose and a low injection rate, volume, and concentration of contrast agent (hereafter, a \"quadruple-low protocol\") with that of EID CT in patients with lung cancer. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients with lung cancer undergoing PCCT or EID CT between July 2024 and September 2024. Patients underwent PCCT with the low radiation dose plus reduced contrast agent protocol (quadruple-low protocol: 2.0 mL/sec injection rate, 1.0 mL/kg of 320 mg of iodine per milliliter) and EID CT with a conventional protocol. Two radiologists independently evaluated the subjective image quality and lesion imaging features. Lesion and parenchymal metrics (attenuation, signal-to-noise ratio [SNR], and contrast-to-noise ratio [CNR]) were also assessed. Data were compared using the Student <i>t</i> test, Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test, or multivariable regression. Sensitivity analysis was performed using propensity score matching. Results Among 425 participants (mean age, 61 years ± 9.5 [SD]; 273 men), PCCT reduced radiation dose by 55% (mean effective dose, 3.49 mSv ± 0.91 vs 7.82 mSv ± 2.15; <i>P</i> < .001) while lowering contrast agent injection rate, volume, and concentration by 33% (<i>P</i> < .001), 22% (<i>P</i> < .001), and 9% (<i>P</i> < .001), respectively. PCCT reduced the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) compared with EID CT (0% [0 of 120] vs 7.9% [24 of 305], <i>P</i> = .02). PCCT also exhibited higher objective SNR and CNR in lung lesions and parenchyma, with superior subjective image quality scores and increased diagnostic confidence for imaging features (all adjusted <i>P</i> < .001). Results remained consistent in sensitivity analysis. Conclusion Compared with EID CT, PCCT with a quadruple-low protocol reduced the incidence of CIN and enhanced image quality and diagnostic confidence in imaging features in patients with lung cancer. © RSNA, 2026 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"318 2","pages":"e251126"},"PeriodicalIF":15.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146213721","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing Glymphatic Function Measures: Diffusion Tensor Image Analysis Along Perivascular Spaces (DTI-ALPS) versus Intrathecal Contrast-Enhanced MRI. 比较淋巴功能测量:沿血管周围间隙扩散张量图像分析(DTI-ALPS)与鞘内对比增强MRI。
IF 15.2 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.252070
Ingrid Mossige, Lars M Valnes, Tryggve H Storås, Kyrre E Emblem, Per K Eide, Geir Ringstad

Background Diffusion-tensor image (DTI) analysis along the perivascular space (ALPS) is a noninvasive but not well-validated method proposed to evaluate glymphatic function. Purpose To assess ALPS indexes across participant groups and compare them with measures of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tracer enrichment and clearance obtained by intrathecal contrast-enhanced MRI (glymphatic MRI [gMRI]). Materials and Methods This secondary analysis of a prospective observational study included participants who underwent clinical work-up for CSF disorders from September 2015 to December 2019. MRI scans were acquired before injection and 24 and 48 hours after intrathecal injection of 0.5 mmol of gadobutrol. DTI scans were preprocessed and segmented using the FMRIB Software Library. Intrathecal contrast-enhanced MRI (ie, gMRI) scans were registered to the baseline T1-weighted image, and cortex and white matter (WM) were segmented with FreeSurfer. ALPS indexes were compared with relative changes in normalized T1-weighted signal intensity at 24 and 48 hours in regions of the cortex, subcortical WM, and deep WM where the ALPS regions of interest are located by using regression analysis. Results A total of 56 participants were included (mean age, 48 years ± 20 [SD]; 36 women): 16 with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH), 10 with arachnoid cysts, 11 with idiopathic intracranial hypertension, and 19 reference participants. The ALPS index was lower in the iNPH group than in the reference group (ALPS index, 1.26 and 1.68, respectively; P < .001). Across groups, the ALPS index and degree of CSF tracer enrichment at 24 hours in deep WM were negatively associated (β = -48; P < .001). However, mean tracer enrichment in the ALPS regions of interest was low (10%), in some participants close to 0, whereas enrichment in the cortex ranged from 68% to 81%. Across groups, there was no evidence of associations between the ALPS index and measures of CSF tracer dynamics at 48 hours in any region (|β| ≤ 8; P ≥ .55). Conclusion CSF tracer enhancement in the ALPS regions of interest was sparse across groups, and the association between the ALPS index and gMRI markers of glymphatic function was limited. © The Author(s) 2026. Published by the Radiological Society of North America under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article.

沿血管周围间隙(ALPS)扩散张量图像(DTI)分析是一种无创但未经充分验证的评估淋巴功能的方法。目的评估各参与者组的ALPS指数,并将其与鞘内增强磁共振成像(glymphatic MRI [gMRI])获得的脑脊液(CSF)示踪剂富集和清除的测量结果进行比较。该前瞻性观察性研究的二级分析纳入了2015年9月至2019年12月期间接受脑脊液疾病临床检查的参与者。在注射前和鞘内注射0.5 mmol加多布鲁后24和48小时进行MRI扫描。使用FMRIB软件库对DTI扫描进行预处理和分割。鞘内对比增强MRI(即gMRI)扫描与基线t1加权图像相匹配,并用FreeSurfer对皮质和白质(WM)进行分割。通过回归分析,将ALPS指数与24小时和48小时时皮层、皮层下WM和深层WM中感兴趣的ALPS区域的归一化t1加权信号强度的相对变化进行比较。结果共纳入56例受试者(平均年龄48岁±20岁[SD],女性36例):特发性常压脑积水(iNPH) 16例,蛛网膜囊肿10例,特发性颅内高压11例,对照19例。iNPH组的ALPS指数低于对照组(ALPS指数分别为1.26和1.68,P < 0.001)。各组间,深WM 24h时ALPS指数与CSF示踪剂富集程度呈负相关(β = -48; P < .001)。然而,在一些参与者中,平均示踪剂在感兴趣的阿尔卑斯区域的富集很低(10%),接近于0,而在皮层的富集从68%到81%不等。在各组中,没有证据表明阿尔卑斯指数与任何区域48小时CSF示踪剂动态测量之间存在关联(|β|≤8;P≥0.55)。结论脑脊液示踪剂在阿尔卑斯感兴趣区域的增强在各组间是稀疏的,阿尔卑斯指数与淋巴功能的gMRI标记物之间的关联是有限的。©作者2026。由北美放射学会在CC by 4.0许可下发布。本文有补充材料。
{"title":"Comparing Glymphatic Function Measures: Diffusion Tensor Image Analysis Along Perivascular Spaces (DTI-ALPS) versus Intrathecal Contrast-Enhanced MRI.","authors":"Ingrid Mossige, Lars M Valnes, Tryggve H Storås, Kyrre E Emblem, Per K Eide, Geir Ringstad","doi":"10.1148/radiol.252070","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.252070","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Diffusion-tensor image (DTI) analysis along the perivascular space (ALPS) is a noninvasive but not well-validated method proposed to evaluate glymphatic function. Purpose To assess ALPS indexes across participant groups and compare them with measures of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tracer enrichment and clearance obtained by intrathecal contrast-enhanced MRI (glymphatic MRI [gMRI]). Materials and Methods This secondary analysis of a prospective observational study included participants who underwent clinical work-up for CSF disorders from September 2015 to December 2019. MRI scans were acquired before injection and 24 and 48 hours after intrathecal injection of 0.5 mmol of gadobutrol. DTI scans were preprocessed and segmented using the FMRIB Software Library. Intrathecal contrast-enhanced MRI (ie, gMRI) scans were registered to the baseline T1-weighted image, and cortex and white matter (WM) were segmented with FreeSurfer. ALPS indexes were compared with relative changes in normalized T1-weighted signal intensity at 24 and 48 hours in regions of the cortex, subcortical WM, and deep WM where the ALPS regions of interest are located by using regression analysis. Results A total of 56 participants were included (mean age, 48 years ± 20 [SD]; 36 women): 16 with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH), 10 with arachnoid cysts, 11 with idiopathic intracranial hypertension, and 19 reference participants. The ALPS index was lower in the iNPH group than in the reference group (ALPS index, 1.26 and 1.68, respectively; <i>P</i> < .001). Across groups, the ALPS index and degree of CSF tracer enrichment at 24 hours in deep WM were negatively associated (β = -48; <i>P</i> < .001). However, mean tracer enrichment in the ALPS regions of interest was low (10%), in some participants close to 0, whereas enrichment in the cortex ranged from 68% to 81%. Across groups, there was no evidence of associations between the ALPS index and measures of CSF tracer dynamics at 48 hours in any region (|β| ≤ 8; <i>P</i> ≥ .55). Conclusion CSF tracer enhancement in the ALPS regions of interest was sparse across groups, and the association between the ALPS index and gMRI markers of glymphatic function was limited. © The Author(s) 2026. Published by the Radiological Society of North America under a CC BY 4.0 license. <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"318 2","pages":"e252070"},"PeriodicalIF":15.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146114291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Agentic AI in Radiology. 放射学中的人工智能。
IF 15.2 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.252730
Satvik Tripathi, Tessa S Cook, Woojin Kim
{"title":"Agentic AI in Radiology.","authors":"Satvik Tripathi, Tessa S Cook, Woojin Kim","doi":"10.1148/radiol.252730","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.252730","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"318 2","pages":"e252730"},"PeriodicalIF":15.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146114256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Personalized Approach to Lung Nodule Management: The Wave of the Future. 个性化的肺结节治疗方法:未来的潮流。
IF 15.2 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.254053
Suzanne C Byrne, Mizuki Nishino
{"title":"A Personalized Approach to Lung Nodule Management: The Wave of the Future.","authors":"Suzanne C Byrne, Mizuki Nishino","doi":"10.1148/radiol.254053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.254053","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"318 2","pages":"e254053"},"PeriodicalIF":15.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147284997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Super-Resolution Deep Learning Reconstruction for Coronary CT Angiography: Coronary Stenosis Assessment and CAD-RADS Reclassification. 冠状动脉CT血管造影的超分辨率深度学习重建:冠状动脉狭窄评估和CAD-RADS再分类。
IF 15.2 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.252163
Limiao Zou, Cheng Xu, Xiaohuan Liu, Linghao Wang, Tao Zhou, Lin Yang, Xiaohui Guan, Na Li, Ke Feng, Wenli Hong, Bo Wang, Min Xu, Joanne D Schuijf, Keting Xu, Jian Cao, Jikun Zheng, Zhihua Wu, Hongzhong Mo, Tong Zhang, Demao Deng, Jiexin Sheng, Shouqiang Jia, Ying Li, Shaofei He, Changhua Liang, Yining Wang

Background A novel super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) algorithm, trained using data acquired with ultra-high-resolution CT, can potentially enhance spatial resolution in coronary CT angiography (CCTA), improving stenosis assessment; however, evidence is limited. Purpose To compare the performance of SR-DLR versus hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) in assessing coronary stenosis, using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the reference standard, and to explore the potential impact on patient-level Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) classification. Materials and Methods From September 2023 to November 2024, patients who underwent clinically indicated CCTA and ICA within a 2-month interval were prospectively enrolled at 10 hospitals across China. CCTA images were reconstructed with both HIR and SR-DLR, and percentage diameter stenosis (PDS) of calcified, noncalcified, and mixed plaques was quantified. Participant-level CAD-RADS category was determined based on the highest-grade stenosis. Using ICA as the reference standard, diagnostic performance of HIR and SR-DLR in detecting significant stenosis (50% or greater stenosis) was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results The study included 204 individuals (mean age, 64.3 years ± 9.1 [SD]; 137 male participants) with 605 plaques (175 calcified, 140 noncalcified, 290 mixed). Median PDS for calcified plaques was lower with SR-DLR than with HIR (58% [IQR, 44%-71%] vs 63% [IQR, 53%-85%]; P < .001), with no evidence of a difference in median PDS for noncalcified (P = .09) or mixed (P = .40) plaques. Forty-one individuals were assigned a different CAD-RADS category with SL-DLR relative to HIR: 25 downgraded and 16 upgraded. SR-DLR outperformed HIR in detecting significant stenosis at the lesion level (AUC, 0.97 [95% CI: 0.96, 0.98] vs 0.90 [95% CI: 0.87, 0.92]; P < .001) and participant level (AUC, 0.90 [95% CI: 0.82, 0.98] vs 0.79 [95% CI: 0.70, 0.89]; P < .001). Conclusion SR-DLR outperformed HIR for coronary stenosis assessment and led to 20% (41 of 204) participant-level CAD-RADS reclassification. © The Author(s) 2026. Published by the Radiological Society of North America under a CC BY 4.0 license. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry no. ChiCTR2300075364 Supplemental material is available for this article.

一种新的超分辨率深度学习重建(SR-DLR)算法,利用超高分辨率CT采集的数据进行训练,可以提高冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)的空间分辨率,改善狭窄评估;然而,证据有限。目的以有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)为参考标准,比较SR-DLR与混合迭代重建(HIR)评估冠状动脉狭窄的性能,探讨其对患者级冠状动脉疾病报告与数据系统(CAD-RADS)分级的潜在影响。材料与方法于2023年9月至2024年11月,前瞻性纳入中国10家医院在2个月内接受临床指征CCTA和ICA的患者。用HIR和SR-DLR重建CCTA图像,量化钙化、非钙化和混合斑块的直径狭窄百分比(PDS)。参与者水平的CAD-RADS分类是根据最高级别的狭窄来确定的。以ICA为参考标准,以受者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)比较HIR和SR-DLR对明显狭窄(50%及以上)的诊断性能。结果研究纳入204人(平均年龄64.3岁±9.1 [SD]; 137名男性),605个斑块(175个钙化,140个非钙化,290个混合)。SR-DLR组钙化斑块的中位PDS低于HIR组(58% [IQR, 44%-71%] vs 63% [IQR, 53%-85%]; P < 0.001),无证据表明非钙化斑块(P = 0.09)或混合斑块(P = 0.40)的中位PDS有差异。41人被分配到不同的CAD-RADS类别,SL-DLR相对于HIR: 25人降级,16人升级。SR-DLR在病变水平(AUC, 0.97 [95% CI: 0.96, 0.98] vs 0.90 [95% CI: 0.87, 0.92]; P < 0.001)和参与者水平(AUC, 0.90 [95% CI: 0.82, 0.98] vs 0.79 [95% CI: 0.70, 0.89]; P < 0.001)检测明显狭窄优于HIR。结论SR-DLR在评估冠状动脉狭窄方面优于HIR,导致20%(204例中的41例)受试者水平CAD-RADS重新分类。©作者2026。由北美放射学会在CC by 4.0许可下发布。中国临床试验注册号:ChiCTR2300075364本文有补充材料。
{"title":"Super-Resolution Deep Learning Reconstruction for Coronary CT Angiography: Coronary Stenosis Assessment and CAD-RADS Reclassification.","authors":"Limiao Zou, Cheng Xu, Xiaohuan Liu, Linghao Wang, Tao Zhou, Lin Yang, Xiaohui Guan, Na Li, Ke Feng, Wenli Hong, Bo Wang, Min Xu, Joanne D Schuijf, Keting Xu, Jian Cao, Jikun Zheng, Zhihua Wu, Hongzhong Mo, Tong Zhang, Demao Deng, Jiexin Sheng, Shouqiang Jia, Ying Li, Shaofei He, Changhua Liang, Yining Wang","doi":"10.1148/radiol.252163","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.252163","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background A novel super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) algorithm, trained using data acquired with ultra-high-resolution CT, can potentially enhance spatial resolution in coronary CT angiography (CCTA), improving stenosis assessment; however, evidence is limited. Purpose To compare the performance of SR-DLR versus hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) in assessing coronary stenosis, using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the reference standard, and to explore the potential impact on patient-level Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) classification. Materials and Methods From September 2023 to November 2024, patients who underwent clinically indicated CCTA and ICA within a 2-month interval were prospectively enrolled at 10 hospitals across China. CCTA images were reconstructed with both HIR and SR-DLR, and percentage diameter stenosis (PDS) of calcified, noncalcified, and mixed plaques was quantified. Participant-level CAD-RADS category was determined based on the highest-grade stenosis. Using ICA as the reference standard, diagnostic performance of HIR and SR-DLR in detecting significant stenosis (50% or greater stenosis) was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results The study included 204 individuals (mean age, 64.3 years ± 9.1 [SD]; 137 male participants) with 605 plaques (175 calcified, 140 noncalcified, 290 mixed). Median PDS for calcified plaques was lower with SR-DLR than with HIR (58% [IQR, 44%-71%] vs 63% [IQR, 53%-85%]; <i>P</i> < .001), with no evidence of a difference in median PDS for noncalcified (<i>P</i> = .09) or mixed (<i>P</i> = .40) plaques. Forty-one individuals were assigned a different CAD-RADS category with SL-DLR relative to HIR: 25 downgraded and 16 upgraded. SR-DLR outperformed HIR in detecting significant stenosis at the lesion level (AUC, 0.97 [95% CI: 0.96, 0.98] vs 0.90 [95% CI: 0.87, 0.92]; <i>P</i> < .001) and participant level (AUC, 0.90 [95% CI: 0.82, 0.98] vs 0.79 [95% CI: 0.70, 0.89]; <i>P</i> < .001). Conclusion SR-DLR outperformed HIR for coronary stenosis assessment and led to 20% (41 of 204) participant-level CAD-RADS reclassification. © The Author(s) 2026. Published by the Radiological Society of North America under a CC BY 4.0 license. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry no. ChiCTR2300075364 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"318 2","pages":"e252163"},"PeriodicalIF":15.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146150534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quality of Gadoxetate-enhanced MRI versus US during Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening in Participants with Cirrhosis. 肝硬化患者肝细胞癌筛查期间,加多赛特增强MRI与US的质量比较。
IF 15.2 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.251497
Sara Lewis, Benjamin Wildman-Tobriner, Jordan Cuevas, Sergio Calle, Ian Bolger, Katherine Wang, Himanshu Joshi, Lori Mankowski Gettle, Ju Dong Yang, Ji Hye Min, Claude B Sirlin, Scott B Reeder, Mustafa R Bashir, Bachir Taouli

Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance typically involves US, although gadoxetate-enhanced MRI may improve sensitivity. Identifying factors impacting image quality is essential, but comparative data between US and MRI are lacking. Purpose To compare image quality and its determinants in gadoxetate-enhanced MRI versus US in participants with cirrhosis who are undergoing HCC screening in a prospective bicenter study. Materials and Methods In a secondary analysis of a prospective bicenter North American HCC screening study (September 2020 to May 2023), participants with cirrhosis underwent contemporaneous gadoxetate-enhanced MRI and liver US. Two independent observers evaluated MRI scans for dynamic phase motion, hepatobiliary phase liver uptake, and diffusion-weighted imaging quality. Sums of these assessments were trichotomized into MRI scores (MR-A: no or minimal limitations; MR-B: moderate limitations; and MR-C: severe limitations). US quality was scored per the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (US-A: no or minimal limitations; US-B: moderate limitations; and US-C: severe limitations). Clinical factors and quality were assessed using univariable and/or multivariable analyses. Proportions of quality scores were compared (McNemar χ2 test). Results Among the 245 participants with cirrhosis (median age, 61 years; 133 men), MRI quality scores were classified as MR-A in 80.4% (197 of 245 participants), MR-B in 18.4% (45 of 245 participants), and MR-C in 1.2% (three of 245 participants), whereas available US visualization scores were classified as US-A in 24.2% (58 of 240 participants), US-B in 61.7% (148 of 240 participants), and US-C in 14.1% (34 of 240 participants). The proportion of examination scores with no or minimal limitations was higher for MRI than US in 240 participants with both set of scores (P < .001). Obesity (body mass index ≥ 30, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) reduced quality for both modalities (MRI univariable odds ratio [OR], 4.20 [95% CI: 1.20, 22.6], P = .01; US OR, 2.50 [95% CI: 1.00, 6.00], P = .04), not confirmed at multivariable analysis. Child-Pugh score of B and/or C reduced MRI quality at univariable (OR, 2.60 [95% CI: 1.05, 6.30]; P = .03) and multivariable (adjusted OR, 3.95 [95% CI: 1.50, 10.42]; P = .006) analysis. Conclusion Most participants undergoing HCC screening had excellent MRI quality even when US was limited. Quality was adversely affected by obesity (both modalities) and Child-Pugh score (MRI only). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04539717 © The Author(s) 2026. Published by the Radiological Society of North America under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article.

肝细胞癌(HCC)的监测通常包括超声,尽管加多赛特增强MRI可能提高敏感性。确定影响图像质量的因素至关重要,但缺乏US和MRI之间的比较数据。目的:在一项前瞻性双中心研究中,比较肝硬化患者接受HCC筛查时,加多赛特增强MRI和US的图像质量及其决定因素。在一项前瞻性北美中中心HCC筛查研究(2020年9月至2023年5月)的二次分析中,肝硬化患者同时接受了加多赛特增强MRI和肝脏超声检查。两名独立观察员评估MRI扫描的动态相运动、肝胆相肝脏摄取和弥散加权成像质量。这些评估的总和被三分化成MRI评分(MR-A:无限制或最小限制;MR-B:中度限制;MR-C:严重限制)。根据肝脏影像学报告和数据系统对US质量进行评分(US- a:无限制或最小限制;US- b:中度限制;US- c:严重限制)。使用单变量和/或多变量分析评估临床因素和质量。比较质量评分比例(McNemar χ2检验)。结果在245名肝硬化患者(中位年龄61岁,男性133名)中,MRI质量评分分为MR-A的占80.4%(245名参与者中197名),MR-B的占18.4%(245名参与者中45名),MR-C的占1.2%(245名参与者中3名),而可用的US可视化评分分为US- a的占24.2%(240名参与者中58名),US- b的占61.7%(240名参与者中148名),US- c的占14.1%(240名参与者中34名)。在240名参与者中,MRI检查评分无限制或最低限制的比例高于US (P < 0.001)。肥胖(体重指数≥30,以体重公斤除以身高米的平方计算)降低了两种模式的质量(MRI单变量优势比[OR], 4.20 [95% CI: 1.20, 22.6], P = 0.01; US OR, 2.50 [95% CI: 1.00, 6.00], P = 0.04),在多变量分析中未得到证实。Child-Pugh评分B和/或C降低了单变量(or, 2.60 [95% CI: 1.05, 6.30]; P = .03)和多变量(校正or, 3.95 [95% CI: 1.50, 10.42]; P = .006)分析的MRI质量。结论:大多数接受HCC筛查的参与者即使在超声受限的情况下,MRI质量也很好。肥胖(两种模式)和Child-Pugh评分(仅MRI)对质量有不利影响。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04539717©作者2026。由北美放射学会在CC by 4.0许可下发布。本文有补充材料。
{"title":"Quality of Gadoxetate-enhanced MRI versus US during Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening in Participants with Cirrhosis.","authors":"Sara Lewis, Benjamin Wildman-Tobriner, Jordan Cuevas, Sergio Calle, Ian Bolger, Katherine Wang, Himanshu Joshi, Lori Mankowski Gettle, Ju Dong Yang, Ji Hye Min, Claude B Sirlin, Scott B Reeder, Mustafa R Bashir, Bachir Taouli","doi":"10.1148/radiol.251497","DOIUrl":"10.1148/radiol.251497","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance typically involves US, although gadoxetate-enhanced MRI may improve sensitivity. Identifying factors impacting image quality is essential, but comparative data between US and MRI are lacking. Purpose To compare image quality and its determinants in gadoxetate-enhanced MRI versus US in participants with cirrhosis who are undergoing HCC screening in a prospective bicenter study. Materials and Methods In a secondary analysis of a prospective bicenter North American HCC screening study (September 2020 to May 2023), participants with cirrhosis underwent contemporaneous gadoxetate-enhanced MRI and liver US. Two independent observers evaluated MRI scans for dynamic phase motion, hepatobiliary phase liver uptake, and diffusion-weighted imaging quality. Sums of these assessments were trichotomized into MRI scores (MR-A: no or minimal limitations; MR-B: moderate limitations; and MR-C: severe limitations). US quality was scored per the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (US-A: no or minimal limitations; US-B: moderate limitations; and US-C: severe limitations). Clinical factors and quality were assessed using univariable and/or multivariable analyses. Proportions of quality scores were compared (McNemar χ<sup>2</sup> test). Results Among the 245 participants with cirrhosis (median age, 61 years; 133 men), MRI quality scores were classified as MR-A in 80.4% (197 of 245 participants), MR-B in 18.4% (45 of 245 participants), and MR-C in 1.2% (three of 245 participants), whereas available US visualization scores were classified as US-A in 24.2% (58 of 240 participants), US-B in 61.7% (148 of 240 participants), and US-C in 14.1% (34 of 240 participants). The proportion of examination scores with no or minimal limitations was higher for MRI than US in 240 participants with both set of scores (<i>P</i> < .001). Obesity (body mass index ≥ 30, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) reduced quality for both modalities (MRI univariable odds ratio [OR], 4.20 [95% CI: 1.20, 22.6], <i>P</i> = .01; US OR, 2.50 [95% CI: 1.00, 6.00], <i>P</i> = .04), not confirmed at multivariable analysis. Child-Pugh score of B and/or C reduced MRI quality at univariable (OR, 2.60 [95% CI: 1.05, 6.30]; <i>P</i> = .03) and multivariable (adjusted OR, 3.95 [95% CI: 1.50, 10.42]; <i>P</i> = .006) analysis. Conclusion Most participants undergoing HCC screening had excellent MRI quality even when US was limited. Quality was adversely affected by obesity (both modalities) and Child-Pugh score (MRI only). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04539717 © The Author(s) 2026. Published by the Radiological Society of North America under a CC BY 4.0 license. <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"318 2","pages":"e251497"},"PeriodicalIF":15.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12932957/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146150528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Radiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1