首页 > 最新文献

Radiology最新文献

英文 中文
The Roles of Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System US and Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System MRI in the Evaluation of Adnexal Lesions. 卵巢-附件报告和数据系统 US 和卵巢-附件报告和数据系统 MRI 在附件病变评估中的作用。
IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.233332
Krupa K Patel-Lippmann, Akshya Gupta, Marisa F Martin, Catherine H Phillips, Katherine E Maturen, Priyanka Jha, Elizabeth A Sadowski, Erica B Stein

The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) is an evidence-based clinical support system for ovarian and adnexal lesion assessment in women of average risk. The system has both US and MRI components with separate but complementary lexicons and assessment categories to assign the risk of malignancy. US is an appropriate initial imaging modality, and O-RADS US can accurately help to characterize most adnexal lesions. MRI is a valuable adjunct imaging tool to US, and O-RADS MRI can help to both confirm a benign diagnosis and accurately stratify lesions that are at risk for malignancy. This article will review the O-RADS US and MRI systems, highlight their similarities and differences, and provide an overview of the interplay between the systems. When used together, the O-RADS US and MRI systems can help to accurately diagnose benign lesions, assess the risk of malignancy in lesions suspicious for malignancy, and triage patients for optimal management.

卵巢-附件报告和数据系统(O-RADS)是一个以证据为基础的临床支持系统,用于评估中等风险女性的卵巢和附件病变。该系统包含 US 和 MRI 两部分,具有独立但互补的词典和评估类别,可用于分配恶性肿瘤风险。US 是一种合适的初始成像方式,O-RADS US 可以准确帮助确定大多数附件病变的特征。核磁共振成像是 US 的重要辅助成像工具,O-RADS 核磁共振成像可帮助确诊良性病变,并对有恶变风险的病变进行准确分层。本文将回顾 O-RADS US 和 MRI 系统,强调它们的异同,并概述这两个系统之间的相互作用。O-RADS US 和 MRI 系统结合使用,有助于准确诊断良性病变,评估恶性可疑病变的恶性风险,并对患者进行分流,以便进行最佳治疗。
{"title":"The Roles of Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System US and Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System MRI in the Evaluation of Adnexal Lesions.","authors":"Krupa K Patel-Lippmann, Akshya Gupta, Marisa F Martin, Catherine H Phillips, Katherine E Maturen, Priyanka Jha, Elizabeth A Sadowski, Erica B Stein","doi":"10.1148/radiol.233332","DOIUrl":"10.1148/radiol.233332","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) is an evidence-based clinical support system for ovarian and adnexal lesion assessment in women of average risk. The system has both US and MRI components with separate but complementary lexicons and assessment categories to assign the risk of malignancy. US is an appropriate initial imaging modality, and O-RADS US can accurately help to characterize most adnexal lesions. MRI is a valuable adjunct imaging tool to US, and O-RADS MRI can help to both confirm a benign diagnosis and accurately stratify lesions that are at risk for malignancy. This article will review the O-RADS US and MRI systems, highlight their similarities and differences, and provide an overview of the interplay between the systems. When used together, the O-RADS US and MRI systems can help to accurately diagnose benign lesions, assess the risk of malignancy in lesions suspicious for malignancy, and triage patients for optimal management.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142005115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Field-Cycling MRI for Identifying Minor Ischemic Stroke Below 0.2 T. 用于识别 0.2 T 以下轻微缺血性中风的场循环磁共振成像。
IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.232972
Vasiliki Mallikourti, P James Ross, Oliver Maier, German Guzman-Gutierrez, Edit Franko, David J Lurie, Lionel M Broche, Mary Joan Macleod

Background Field-cycling imaging (FCI) is a new technology developed at the University of Aberdeen that measures change in T1 relaxation time constant of tissues over a range of low magnetic field strengths (0.2-200 mT) by rapidly switching between different fields during the pulse sequence. This provides new sources of contrast, including some invisible to clinical MRI scanners, and may be a useful alternative imaging modality for stroke. Purpose To test whether a prototype whole-body FCI scanner can be used to identify infarct regions in patients with subacute ischemic stroke. Materials and Methods This prospective study screened consecutive adult patients admitted to a single center stroke unit from February 2018 to March 2020 and April to December 2021. Included participants with confirmed ischemic stroke underwent FCI 1-6 days after ictus. FCI scans were obtained at four to six evolution fields between 0.2 mT and 0.2 T, with five evolution times from 5 to 546 msec. T1 maps were generated. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare infarct region and contralateral unaffected brain, and Spearman rank correlation was used to examine associations between infarct to contralateral tissue contrast ratio and field strengths. Two independent readers blinded to clinical images rated the FCI scans. Results Nine participants (mean age, 62 years ± 16 [SD]; all male) successfully completed FCI. FCI scans below 0.2 T exhibited hyperintense T1 regions corresponding to the infarct region identified at baseline imaging, visually confirmed with 86% interrater agreement (Cohen κ = 0.69). Infarct to contralateral tissue contrast ratio increased as magnetic field decreased between 0.2 mT and 0.2 T (r[24] = -0.68; P < .001). T1 dispersion slopes differed between infarct and unaffected tissues (median, 0.23 [IQR, 0.18-0.37] vs 0.35 [IQR, 0.27-0.43]; P = .03). Conclusion Whole-brain FCI can be used to identify subacute ischemic stroke by T1 relaxation mechanisms at field strengths as low as 0.2 mT. Research Registry no. 1813 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article.

背景场循环成像(FCI)是阿伯丁大学开发的一项新技术,通过在脉冲序列中快速切换不同磁场,测量组织在低磁场强度(0.2-200 mT)范围内的 T1 弛豫时间常数变化。这提供了新的对比源,包括一些临床核磁共振扫描仪看不到的对比源,可能是中风的一种有用的替代成像模式。目的 测试全身 FCI 扫描仪原型是否可用于识别亚急性缺血性中风患者的梗死区域。材料和方法 这项前瞻性研究筛选了 2018 年 2 月至 2020 年 3 月和 2021 年 4 月至 12 月期间入住单中心卒中单元的连续成年患者。纳入的确诊缺血性脑卒中患者在发病后 1-6 天接受 FCI 扫描。FCI 扫描在 0.2 mT 和 0.2 T 之间的 4 到 6 个演化场进行,演化时间为 5 到 546 毫秒。生成了 T1 图。使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较梗死区和对侧未受影响的大脑,使用 Spearman 秩相关检验梗死区和对侧组织对比度与场强之间的关系。两名对临床图像视而不见的独立阅读者对 FCI 扫描进行评分。结果 九名参与者(平均年龄 62 岁 ± 16 [SD];均为男性)成功完成了 FCI 扫描。0.2 T以下的FCI扫描显示出与基线成像时确定的梗死区域相对应的高强化T1区域,经目测确认,86%的读片者之间具有一致性(Cohen κ = 0.69)。随着磁场在 0.2 mT 和 0.2 T 之间的降低,梗死区与对侧组织的对比度增加(r[24] = -0.68;P < .001)。梗死组织和未受影响组织的 T1 弥散斜率不同(中位数,0.23 [IQR, 0.18-0.37] vs 0.35 [IQR, 0.27-0.43]; P = .03)。结论 全脑 FCI 可用于在低至 0.2 mT 的场强下通过 T1 松弛机制识别亚急性缺血性中风。研究登记号1813 以 CC BY 4.0 许可发布。本文有补充材料。
{"title":"Field-Cycling MRI for Identifying Minor Ischemic Stroke Below 0.2 T.","authors":"Vasiliki Mallikourti, P James Ross, Oliver Maier, German Guzman-Gutierrez, Edit Franko, David J Lurie, Lionel M Broche, Mary Joan Macleod","doi":"10.1148/radiol.232972","DOIUrl":"10.1148/radiol.232972","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Field-cycling imaging (FCI) is a new technology developed at the University of Aberdeen that measures change in T1 relaxation time constant of tissues over a range of low magnetic field strengths (0.2-200 mT) by rapidly switching between different fields during the pulse sequence. This provides new sources of contrast, including some invisible to clinical MRI scanners, and may be a useful alternative imaging modality for stroke. Purpose To test whether a prototype whole-body FCI scanner can be used to identify infarct regions in patients with subacute ischemic stroke. Materials and Methods This prospective study screened consecutive adult patients admitted to a single center stroke unit from February 2018 to March 2020 and April to December 2021. Included participants with confirmed ischemic stroke underwent FCI 1-6 days after ictus. FCI scans were obtained at four to six evolution fields between 0.2 mT and 0.2 T, with five evolution times from 5 to 546 msec. T1 maps were generated. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare infarct region and contralateral unaffected brain, and Spearman rank correlation was used to examine associations between infarct to contralateral tissue contrast ratio and field strengths. Two independent readers blinded to clinical images rated the FCI scans. Results Nine participants (mean age, 62 years ± 16 [SD]; all male) successfully completed FCI. FCI scans below 0.2 T exhibited hyperintense T1 regions corresponding to the infarct region identified at baseline imaging, visually confirmed with 86% interrater agreement (Cohen κ = 0.69). Infarct to contralateral tissue contrast ratio increased as magnetic field decreased between 0.2 mT and 0.2 T (<i>r</i>[24] = -0.68; <i>P</i> < .001). T1 dispersion slopes differed between infarct and unaffected tissues (median, 0.23 [IQR, 0.18-0.37] vs 0.35 [IQR, 0.27-0.43]; <i>P</i> = .03). Conclusion Whole-brain FCI can be used to identify subacute ischemic stroke by T1 relaxation mechanisms at field strengths as low as 0.2 mT. Research Registry no. 1813 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142073673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Eisenmenger Syndrome Combined with Pulmonary Artery Aneurysm and Dissection. 艾森曼格综合征合并肺动脉瘤和肺动脉夹层。
IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.240478
Zihao Li, Zhao Li
{"title":"Eisenmenger Syndrome Combined with Pulmonary Artery Aneurysm and Dissection.","authors":"Zihao Li, Zhao Li","doi":"10.1148/radiol.240478","DOIUrl":"10.1148/radiol.240478","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142073671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Emerging AI Autonomy: Reducing the Burden of Unremarkable Examinations. 新兴的人工智能自主性:减轻无特征检查的负担。
IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.241490
Soon Ho Yoon, Eui Jin Hwang
{"title":"Emerging AI Autonomy: Reducing the Burden of Unremarkable Examinations.","authors":"Soon Ho Yoon, Eui Jin Hwang","doi":"10.1148/radiol.241490","DOIUrl":"10.1148/radiol.241490","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142005107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quantitative 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET and Clinical Outcomes in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Following 177Lu-PSMA-617 (VISION Trial). 定量 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET 与 177Lu-PSMA-617 治疗转移性抗阉割前列腺癌的临床疗效(VISION 试验)。
IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.233460
Phillip H Kuo, Michael J Morris, Jacob Hesterman, A Tuba Kendi, Kambiz Rahbar, Xiao X Wei, Bruno Fang, Nabil Adra, Rohan Garje, Jeff M Michalski, Kim Chi, Johann de Bono, Karim Fizazi, Bernd Krause, Oliver Sartor, Scott T Tagawa, Samson Ghebremariam, Marcia Brackman, Connie C Wong, Ana M Catafau, Taylor Benson, Andrew J Armstrong, Ken Herrmann

Background Lutetium 177 [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617) is a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Quantitative PSMA PET/CT analysis could provide information on 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment benefits. Purpose To explore the association between quantitative baseline gallium 68 [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (68Ga-PSMA-11) PET/CT parameters and treatment response and outcomes in the VISION trial. Materials and Methods This was an exploratory secondary analysis of the VISION trial. Eligible participants were randomized (June 2018 to October 2019) in a 2:1 ratio to 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy (7.4 GBq every 6 weeks for up to six cycles) plus standard of care (SOC) or to SOC only. Baseline 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET parameters, including the mean and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmean and SUVmax), PSMA-positive tumor volume, and tumor load, were extracted from five anatomic regions and the whole body. Associations of quantitative PET parameters with radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and prostate-specific antigen response were investigated using univariable and multivariable analyses (with treatment as the only other covariate). Outcomes were assessed in subgroups based on SUVmean quartiles. Results Quantitative PET parameters were well balanced between study arms for the 826 participants included. The median whole-body tumor SUVmean was 7.6 (IQR, 5.8-9.9). Whole-body tumor SUVmean was the best predictor of 177Lu-PSMA-617 efficacy, with a hazard ratio (HR) range of 0.86-1.43 for all outcomes (all P < .001). A 1-unit whole-body tumor SUVmean increase was associated with a 12% and 10% decrease in risk of an rPFS event and death, respectively. 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SOC prolonged rPFS and OS in all SUVmean quartiles versus SOC only, with no identifiable optimum among participants receiving 177Lu-PSMA-617. Higher baseline PSMA-positive tumor volume and tumor load were associated with worse rPFS (HR range, 1.44-1.53 [P < .05] and 1.02-1.03 [P < .001], respectively) and OS (HR range, 1.36-2.12 [P < .006] and 1.04 [P < .001], respectively). Conclusion Baseline 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT whole-body tumor SUVmean was the best predictor of 177Lu-PSMA-617 efficacy in participants in the VISION trial. Improvements in rPFS and OS with 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SOC were greater among participants with higher whole-body tumor SUVmean, with evidence for benefit at all SUVmean levels. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03511664 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article.

背景 Lutetium 177 [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617(177Lu-PSMA-617)是一种前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)靶向放射性配体疗法,用于治疗转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)。PSMA PET/CT定量分析可提供有关177Lu-PSMA-617治疗效果的信息。目的 探讨VISION试验中基线镓68 [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (68Ga-PSMA-11) PET/CT定量参数与治疗反应和预后之间的关联。材料与方法 这是 VISION 试验的一项探索性二次分析。符合条件的参与者按 2:1 的比例随机分配(2018 年 6 月至 2019 年 10 月)接受 177Lu-PSMA-617 治疗(每 6 周 7.4 GBq,最多 6 个周期)加标准治疗 (SOC) 或仅接受 SOC 治疗。从五个解剖区域和全身提取基线 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET 参数,包括平均和最大标准化摄取值(SUVmean 和 SUVmax)、PSMA 阳性肿瘤体积和肿瘤负荷。采用单变量和多变量分析(治疗是唯一的协变量)研究了 PET 定量参数与放射学无进展生存期(rPFS)、总生存期(OS)、客观反应率和前列腺特异性抗原反应的关系。根据 SUV 平均值四分位数对亚组的结果进行了评估。结果 在纳入的 826 名参与者中,各研究臂的 PET 定量参数非常均衡。全身肿瘤 SUVmean 中位数为 7.6(IQR,5.8-9.9)。全身肿瘤 SUVmean 是 177Lu-PSMA-617 疗效的最佳预测指标,所有结果的危险比 (HR) 范围为 0.86-1.43(所有 P < .001)。全身肿瘤 SUV 平均值每增加 1 个单位,rPFS 事件和死亡风险分别降低 12% 和 10%。177Lu-PSMA-617 加 SOC 与仅加 SOC 相比,177Lu-PSMA-617 在所有 SUVmean 四分位数上都延长了 rPFS 和 OS,在接受 177Lu-PSMA-617 治疗的参与者中没有可识别的最佳治疗效果。较高的基线 PSMA 阳性肿瘤体积和肿瘤负荷与较差的 rPFS(HR 范围分别为 1.44-1.53 [P < .05] 和 1.02-1.03 [P < .001])和 OS(HR 范围分别为 1.36-2.12 [P < .006] 和 1.04 [P < .001])相关。结论 基线 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT 全身肿瘤 SUVmean 是 VISION 试验参与者 177Lu-PSMA-617 疗效的最佳预测指标。全身肿瘤 SUVmean 值越高的参与者,177Lu-PSMA-617 加 SOC 治疗的 rPFS 和 OS 改善幅度越大,有证据表明所有 SUVmean 值水平均可获益。ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03511664 采用 CC BY 4.0 许可发布。本文有补充材料。
{"title":"Quantitative <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET and Clinical Outcomes in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Following <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617 (VISION Trial).","authors":"Phillip H Kuo, Michael J Morris, Jacob Hesterman, A Tuba Kendi, Kambiz Rahbar, Xiao X Wei, Bruno Fang, Nabil Adra, Rohan Garje, Jeff M Michalski, Kim Chi, Johann de Bono, Karim Fizazi, Bernd Krause, Oliver Sartor, Scott T Tagawa, Samson Ghebremariam, Marcia Brackman, Connie C Wong, Ana M Catafau, Taylor Benson, Andrew J Armstrong, Ken Herrmann","doi":"10.1148/radiol.233460","DOIUrl":"10.1148/radiol.233460","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Lutetium 177 [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (<sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617) is a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Quantitative PSMA PET/CT analysis could provide information on <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617 treatment benefits. Purpose To explore the association between quantitative baseline gallium 68 [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (<sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11) PET/CT parameters and treatment response and outcomes in the VISION trial. Materials and Methods This was an exploratory secondary analysis of the VISION trial. Eligible participants were randomized (June 2018 to October 2019) in a 2:1 ratio to <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617 therapy (7.4 GBq every 6 weeks for up to six cycles) plus standard of care (SOC) or to SOC only. Baseline <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET parameters, including the mean and maximum standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>mean</sub> and SUV<sub>max</sub>), PSMA-positive tumor volume, and tumor load, were extracted from five anatomic regions and the whole body. Associations of quantitative PET parameters with radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and prostate-specific antigen response were investigated using univariable and multivariable analyses (with treatment as the only other covariate). Outcomes were assessed in subgroups based on SUV<sub>mean</sub> quartiles. Results Quantitative PET parameters were well balanced between study arms for the 826 participants included. The median whole-body tumor SUV<sub>mean</sub> was 7.6 (IQR, 5.8-9.9). Whole-body tumor SUV<sub>mean</sub> was the best predictor of <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617 efficacy, with a hazard ratio (HR) range of 0.86-1.43 for all outcomes (all <i>P</i> < .001). A 1-unit whole-body tumor SUV<sub>mean</sub> increase was associated with a 12% and 10% decrease in risk of an rPFS event and death, respectively. <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617 plus SOC prolonged rPFS and OS in all SUV<sub>mean</sub> quartiles versus SOC only, with no identifiable optimum among participants receiving <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617. Higher baseline PSMA-positive tumor volume and tumor load were associated with worse rPFS (HR range, 1.44-1.53 [<i>P</i> < .05] and 1.02-1.03 [<i>P</i> < .001], respectively) and OS (HR range, 1.36-2.12 [<i>P</i> < .006] and 1.04 [<i>P</i> < .001], respectively). Conclusion Baseline <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT whole-body tumor SUV<sub>mean</sub> was the best predictor of <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617 efficacy in participants in the VISION trial. Improvements in rPFS and OS with <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617 plus SOC were greater among participants with higher whole-body tumor SUV<sub>mean</sub>, with evidence for benefit at all SUV<sub>mean</sub> levels. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03511664 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366674/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142005112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimal Large Language Model Characteristics to Balance Accuracy and Energy Use for Sustainable Medical Applications. 为可持续医疗应用平衡准确性和能源使用的最佳大型语言模型特性。
IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.240320
Florence X Doo, Dharmam Savani, Adway Kanhere, Ruth C Carlos, Anupam Joshi, Paul H Yi, Vishwa S Parekh

Background Large language models (LLMs) for medical applications use unknown amounts of energy, which contribute to the overall carbon footprint of the health care system. Purpose To investigate the tradeoffs between accuracy and energy use when using different LLM types and sizes for medical applications. Materials and Methods This retrospective study evaluated five different billion (B)-parameter sizes of two open-source LLMs (Meta's Llama 2, a general-purpose model, and LMSYS Org's Vicuna 1.5, a specialized fine-tuned model) using chest radiograph reports from the National Library of Medicine's Indiana University Chest X-ray Collection. Reports with missing demographic information and missing or blank files were excluded. Models were run on local compute clusters with visual computing graphic processing units. A single-task prompt explained clinical terminology and instructed each model to confirm the presence or absence of each of the 13 CheXpert disease labels. Energy use (in kilowatt-hours) was measured using an open-source tool. Accuracy was assessed with 13 CheXpert reference standard labels for diagnostic findings on chest radiographs, where overall accuracy was the mean of individual accuracies of all 13 labels. Efficiency ratios (accuracy per kilowatt-hour) were calculated for each model type and size. Results A total of 3665 chest radiograph reports were evaluated. The Vicuna 1.5 7B and 13B models had higher efficiency ratios (737.28 and 331.40, respectively) and higher overall labeling accuracy (93.83% [3438.69 of 3665 reports] and 93.65% [3432.38 of 3665 reports], respectively) than that of the Llama 2 models (7B: efficiency ratio of 13.39, accuracy of 7.91% [289.76 of 3665 reports]; 13B: efficiency ratio of 40.90, accuracy of 74.08% [2715.15 of 3665 reports]; 70B: efficiency ratio of 22.30, accuracy of 92.70% [3397.38 of 3665 reports]). Vicuna 1.5 7B had the highest efficiency ratio (737.28 vs 13.39 for Llama 2 7B). The larger Llama 2 70B model used more than seven times the energy of its 7B counterpart (4.16 kWh vs 0.59 kWh) with low overall accuracy, resulting in an efficiency ratio of only 22.30. Conclusion Smaller fine-tuned LLMs were more sustainable than larger general-purpose LLMs, using less energy without compromising accuracy, highlighting the importance of LLM selection for medical applications. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

背景 用于医疗应用的大型语言模型(LLMs)会消耗大量能源,这对医疗保健系统的整体碳足迹造成了影响。目的 研究在医疗应用中使用不同类型和大小的 LLM 时,在准确性和能耗之间的权衡。材料和方法 本回顾性研究使用美国国立医学图书馆印第安纳大学胸部 X 光片采集中心的胸部 X 光片报告,评估了两种开源 LLM(通用模型 Meta's Llama 2 和专用微调模型 LMSYS Org's Vicuna 1.5)的五种不同的十亿分参数大小。缺失人口统计学信息和缺失或空白文件的报告被排除在外。模型在配有视觉计算图形处理单元的本地计算集群上运行。单一任务提示解释了临床术语,并指示每个模型确认是否存在 13 种 CheXpert 疾病标签中的每一种。能源使用量(以千瓦时为单位)使用开源工具进行测量。使用 13 个 CheXpert 参考标准标签评估胸片诊断结果的准确性,总体准确性是所有 13 个标签的单个准确性的平均值。计算了每种型号和尺寸的效率比(每千瓦时的准确率)。结果 共评估了 3665 份胸片报告。与 Llama 2 型号相比,Vicuna 1.5 7B 和 13B 型号的效率比(分别为 737.28 和 331.40)更高,总体标记准确率(分别为 93.83% [3665 份报告中的 3438.69 份] 和 93.65% [3665 份报告中的 3432.38 份])也更高(7B:效率比为 13.7B:效率比为 13.39,准确率为 7.91% [3665 份报告中的 289.76 份];13B:效率比为 40.90,准确率为 74.08% [3665 份报告中的 2715.15 份];70B:效率比为 22.30,准确率为 92.70% [3665 份报告中的 3397.38 份])。Vicuna 1.5 7B 的效率比最高(737.28 对 Llama 2 7B 的 13.39)。较大的 Llama 2 70B 模型的能耗是其 7B 模型的七倍多(4.16 千瓦时对 0.59 千瓦时),但总体精度较低,因此效率比仅为 22.30。结论 较小的微调 LLM 比较大的通用 LLM 更具可持续性,在不影响精度的情况下耗能更少,这突出了医疗应用中选择 LLM 的重要性。© RSNA, 2024 本文有补充材料。
{"title":"Optimal Large Language Model Characteristics to Balance Accuracy and Energy Use for Sustainable Medical Applications.","authors":"Florence X Doo, Dharmam Savani, Adway Kanhere, Ruth C Carlos, Anupam Joshi, Paul H Yi, Vishwa S Parekh","doi":"10.1148/radiol.240320","DOIUrl":"10.1148/radiol.240320","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Large language models (LLMs) for medical applications use unknown amounts of energy, which contribute to the overall carbon footprint of the health care system. Purpose To investigate the tradeoffs between accuracy and energy use when using different LLM types and sizes for medical applications. Materials and Methods This retrospective study evaluated five different billion (B)-parameter sizes of two open-source LLMs (Meta's Llama 2, a general-purpose model, and LMSYS Org's Vicuna 1.5, a specialized fine-tuned model) using chest radiograph reports from the National Library of Medicine's Indiana University Chest X-ray Collection. Reports with missing demographic information and missing or blank files were excluded. Models were run on local compute clusters with visual computing graphic processing units. A single-task prompt explained clinical terminology and instructed each model to confirm the presence or absence of each of the 13 CheXpert disease labels. Energy use (in kilowatt-hours) was measured using an open-source tool. Accuracy was assessed with 13 CheXpert reference standard labels for diagnostic findings on chest radiographs, where overall accuracy was the mean of individual accuracies of all 13 labels. Efficiency ratios (accuracy per kilowatt-hour) were calculated for each model type and size. Results A total of 3665 chest radiograph reports were evaluated. The Vicuna 1.5 7B and 13B models had higher efficiency ratios (737.28 and 331.40, respectively) and higher overall labeling accuracy (93.83% [3438.69 of 3665 reports] and 93.65% [3432.38 of 3665 reports], respectively) than that of the Llama 2 models (7B: efficiency ratio of 13.39, accuracy of 7.91% [289.76 of 3665 reports]; 13B: efficiency ratio of 40.90, accuracy of 74.08% [2715.15 of 3665 reports]; 70B: efficiency ratio of 22.30, accuracy of 92.70% [3397.38 of 3665 reports]). Vicuna 1.5 7B had the highest efficiency ratio (737.28 vs 13.39 for Llama 2 7B). The larger Llama 2 70B model used more than seven times the energy of its 7B counterpart (4.16 kWh vs 0.59 kWh) with low overall accuracy, resulting in an efficiency ratio of only 22.30. Conclusion Smaller fine-tuned LLMs were more sustainable than larger general-purpose LLMs, using less energy without compromising accuracy, highlighting the importance of LLM selection for medical applications. © RSNA, 2024 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366671/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142073745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Photon-Counting CT Shows Side-Branch Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm-Pancreatic Duct Connection. 光子计数 CT 显示侧支导管内乳头状粘液瘤-胰腺导管连接。
IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.240611
Khanin Khanungwanitkul, Fides R Schwartz
{"title":"Photon-Counting CT Shows Side-Branch Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm-Pancreatic Duct Connection.","authors":"Khanin Khanungwanitkul, Fides R Schwartz","doi":"10.1148/radiol.240611","DOIUrl":"10.1148/radiol.240611","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141894197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Proposed Updates to the First-Trimester US Reporting Lexicon: A Laudable Goal. 建议更新《美国第一季度报告词典》:值得称赞的目标。
IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.242013
Leslie M Scoutt, Mary E Norton
{"title":"Proposed Updates to the First-Trimester US Reporting Lexicon: A Laudable Goal.","authors":"Leslie M Scoutt, Mary E Norton","doi":"10.1148/radiol.242013","DOIUrl":"10.1148/radiol.242013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366668/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142073746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Medium Vessel Occlusions: The Next Frontier in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke. 中血管闭塞:急性缺血性中风血管内血栓切除术的下一个前沿。
IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.241565
Joan C Wojak
{"title":"Medium Vessel Occlusions: The Next Frontier in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.","authors":"Joan C Wojak","doi":"10.1148/radiol.241565","DOIUrl":"10.1148/radiol.241565","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141894184","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessment of Thrombectomy versus Combined Thrombolysis and Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke and Medium Vessel Occlusion. 对急性缺血性脑卒中和中血管闭塞患者进行血栓清除术与溶栓和血栓清除术联合治疗的评估。
IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.233041
Adam A Dmytriw, Sherief Ghozy, Hamza Adel Salim, Basel Musmar, James E Siegler, Hassan Kobeissi, Hamza Shaikh, Jane Khalife, Mohamad Abdalkader, Piers Klein, Thanh N Nguyen, Jeremy J Heit, Robert W Regenhardt, Nicole M Cancelliere, Kareem El Naamani, Abdelaziz Amllay, Lukas Meyer, Anne Dusart, Flavio Bellante, Géraud Forestier, Aymeric Rouchaud, Suzana Saleme, Charbel Mounayer, Jens Fiehler, Anna Luisa Kühn, Ajit S Puri, Christian Dyzmann, Peter T Kan, Marco Colasurdo, Gaultier Marnat, Jérôme Berge, Xavier Barreau, Igor Sibon, Simona Nedelcu, Nils Henninger, Thomas R Marotta, Christopher J Stapleton, James D Rabinov, Takahiro Ota, Shogo Dofuku, Leonard L L Yeo, Benjamin Y Q Tan, Juan Carlos Martinez-Gutierrez, Sergio Salazar-Marioni, Sunil Sheth, Leonardo Renieri, Carolina Capirossi, Ashkan Mowla, Nimer Adeeb, Hugo H Cuellar-Saenz, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris, Pascal Jabbour, Priyank Khandelwal, Arundhati Biswas, Frédéric Clarençon, Mahmoud Elhorany, Kevin Premat, Iacopo Valente, Alessandro Pedicelli, João Pedro Filipe, Ricardo Varela, Miguel Quintero-Consuegra, Nestor R Gonzalez, Markus A Möhlenbruch, Jessica Jesser, Vincent Costalat, Adrien Ter Schiphorst, Vivek Yedavalli, Pablo Harker, Lina M Chervak, Yasmin Aziz, Benjamin Gory, Christian Paul Stracke, Constantin Hecker, Ramanathan Kadirvel, Monika Killer-Oberpfalzer, Christoph J Griessenauer, Ajith J Thomas, Cheng-Yang Hsieh, David S Liebeskind, Răzvan Alexandru Radu, Andrea M Alexandre, Illario Tancredi, Tobias D Faizy, Robert Fahed, Charlotte S Weyland, Boris Lubicz, Aman B Patel, Vitor Mendes Pereira, Adrien Guenego

Background The combination of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) may have clinical benefits for patients with medium vessel occlusion. Purpose To examine whether MT combined with IVT is associated with different outcomes than MT alone in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and medium vessel occlusion. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included consecutive adult patients with AIS and medium vessel occlusion treated with MT or MT with IVT at 37 academic centers in North America, Asia, and Europe. Data were collected from September 2017 to July 2021. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce confounding. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to test the association between the addition of IVT treatment and different functional and safety outcomes. Results After propensity score matching, 670 patients (median age, 75 years [IQR, 64-82 years]; 356 female) were included in the analysis; 335 underwent MT alone and 335 underwent MT with IVT. Median onset to puncture (350 vs 210 minutes, P < .001) and onset to recanalization (397 vs 273 minutes, P < .001) times were higher in the MT group than the MT with IVT group, respectively. In the univariable regression analysis, the addition of IVT was associated with higher odds of a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2 (odds ratio [OR], 1.44; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.96; P = .019); however, this association was not observed in the multivariable analysis (OR, 1.37; 95% CI: 0.99, 1.89; P = .054). In the multivariable analysis, the addition of IVT also showed no evidence of an association with the odds of first-pass effect (OR, 1.27; 95% CI: 0.9, 1.79; P = .17), Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grades 2b-3 (OR, 1.64; 95% CI: 0.99, 2.73; P = .055), mRS scores 0-1 (OR, 1.27; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.76; P = .16), mortality (OR, 0.78; 95% CI: 0.49, 1.24; P = .29), or intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 1.25; 95% CI: 0.88, 1.76; P = .21). Conclusion Adjunctive IVT may not provide benefit to MT in patients with AIS caused by distal and medium vessel occlusion. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Wojak in this issue.

背景 静脉溶栓(IVT)联合机械取栓(MT)可能对中血管闭塞患者有临床益处。目的 探讨在急性缺血性卒中(AIS)和中血管闭塞患者中,机械溶栓联合静脉溶栓与单纯机械溶栓的疗效是否不同。材料和方法 这项回顾性研究纳入了在北美、亚洲和欧洲 37 个学术中心接受 MT 或 MT 联合 IVT 治疗的 AIS 和中血管闭塞的连续成年患者。数据收集时间为 2017 年 9 月至 2021 年 7 月。为减少混杂因素,进行了倾向评分匹配。进行了单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以检验增加 IVT 治疗与不同功能和安全性结果之间的关联。结果 经过倾向评分匹配后,670 名患者(中位年龄 75 岁 [IQR,64-82 岁];356 名女性)被纳入分析;其中 335 人单独接受了 MT 治疗,335 人接受了 MT 加 IVT 治疗。MT 组从开始到穿刺的中位时间(350 分钟 vs 210 分钟,P < .001)和从开始到再通畅的中位时间(397 分钟 vs 273 分钟,P < .001)分别高于 MT 联合 IVT 组。在单变量回归分析中,加用 IVT 与改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)0-2 分的几率更高相关(几率比 [OR],1.44;95% CI:1.06,1.96;P = .019);但在多变量分析中未观察到这种关联(OR,1.37;95% CI:0.99,1.89;P = .054)。在多变量分析中,增加 IVT 也没有证据表明与首通效应几率(OR,1.27;95% CI:0.9,1.79;P = .17)、脑梗塞溶栓治疗 2b-3 级(OR,1.64;95% CI:0.99,2.73;P = .055)、mRS 评分 0-1(OR,1.27;95% CI:0.91,1.76;P = .16)、死亡率(OR,0.78;95% CI:0.49,1.24;P = .29)或颅内出血(OR,1.25;95% CI:0.88,1.76;P = .21)。结论 对于因远端和中血管闭塞导致的 AIS 患者,辅助 IVT 可能不会比 MT 更有效。© RSNA, 2024 这篇文章有补充材料。另请参阅本期 Wojak 的社论。
{"title":"Assessment of Thrombectomy versus Combined Thrombolysis and Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke and Medium Vessel Occlusion.","authors":"Adam A Dmytriw, Sherief Ghozy, Hamza Adel Salim, Basel Musmar, James E Siegler, Hassan Kobeissi, Hamza Shaikh, Jane Khalife, Mohamad Abdalkader, Piers Klein, Thanh N Nguyen, Jeremy J Heit, Robert W Regenhardt, Nicole M Cancelliere, Kareem El Naamani, Abdelaziz Amllay, Lukas Meyer, Anne Dusart, Flavio Bellante, Géraud Forestier, Aymeric Rouchaud, Suzana Saleme, Charbel Mounayer, Jens Fiehler, Anna Luisa Kühn, Ajit S Puri, Christian Dyzmann, Peter T Kan, Marco Colasurdo, Gaultier Marnat, Jérôme Berge, Xavier Barreau, Igor Sibon, Simona Nedelcu, Nils Henninger, Thomas R Marotta, Christopher J Stapleton, James D Rabinov, Takahiro Ota, Shogo Dofuku, Leonard L L Yeo, Benjamin Y Q Tan, Juan Carlos Martinez-Gutierrez, Sergio Salazar-Marioni, Sunil Sheth, Leonardo Renieri, Carolina Capirossi, Ashkan Mowla, Nimer Adeeb, Hugo H Cuellar-Saenz, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris, Pascal Jabbour, Priyank Khandelwal, Arundhati Biswas, Frédéric Clarençon, Mahmoud Elhorany, Kevin Premat, Iacopo Valente, Alessandro Pedicelli, João Pedro Filipe, Ricardo Varela, Miguel Quintero-Consuegra, Nestor R Gonzalez, Markus A Möhlenbruch, Jessica Jesser, Vincent Costalat, Adrien Ter Schiphorst, Vivek Yedavalli, Pablo Harker, Lina M Chervak, Yasmin Aziz, Benjamin Gory, Christian Paul Stracke, Constantin Hecker, Ramanathan Kadirvel, Monika Killer-Oberpfalzer, Christoph J Griessenauer, Ajith J Thomas, Cheng-Yang Hsieh, David S Liebeskind, Răzvan Alexandru Radu, Andrea M Alexandre, Illario Tancredi, Tobias D Faizy, Robert Fahed, Charlotte S Weyland, Boris Lubicz, Aman B Patel, Vitor Mendes Pereira, Adrien Guenego","doi":"10.1148/radiol.233041","DOIUrl":"10.1148/radiol.233041","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background The combination of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) may have clinical benefits for patients with medium vessel occlusion. Purpose To examine whether MT combined with IVT is associated with different outcomes than MT alone in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and medium vessel occlusion. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included consecutive adult patients with AIS and medium vessel occlusion treated with MT or MT with IVT at 37 academic centers in North America, Asia, and Europe. Data were collected from September 2017 to July 2021. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce confounding. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to test the association between the addition of IVT treatment and different functional and safety outcomes. Results After propensity score matching, 670 patients (median age, 75 years [IQR, 64-82 years]; 356 female) were included in the analysis; 335 underwent MT alone and 335 underwent MT with IVT. Median onset to puncture (350 vs 210 minutes, <i>P</i> < .001) and onset to recanalization (397 vs 273 minutes, <i>P</i> < .001) times were higher in the MT group than the MT with IVT group, respectively. In the univariable regression analysis, the addition of IVT was associated with higher odds of a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2 (odds ratio [OR], 1.44; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.96; <i>P</i> = .019); however, this association was not observed in the multivariable analysis (OR, 1.37; 95% CI: 0.99, 1.89; <i>P</i> = .054). In the multivariable analysis, the addition of IVT also showed no evidence of an association with the odds of first-pass effect (OR, 1.27; 95% CI: 0.9, 1.79; <i>P</i> = .17), Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grades 2b-3 (OR, 1.64; 95% CI: 0.99, 2.73; <i>P</i> = .055), mRS scores 0-1 (OR, 1.27; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.76; <i>P</i> = .16), mortality (OR, 0.78; 95% CI: 0.49, 1.24; <i>P</i> = .29), or intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 1.25; 95% CI: 0.88, 1.76; <i>P</i> = .21). Conclusion Adjunctive IVT may not provide benefit to MT in patients with AIS caused by distal and medium vessel occlusion. © RSNA, 2024 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Wojak in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366672/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141894179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Radiology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1