Krupa K Patel-Lippmann, Akshya Gupta, Marisa F Martin, Catherine H Phillips, Katherine E Maturen, Priyanka Jha, Elizabeth A Sadowski, Erica B Stein
The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) is an evidence-based clinical support system for ovarian and adnexal lesion assessment in women of average risk. The system has both US and MRI components with separate but complementary lexicons and assessment categories to assign the risk of malignancy. US is an appropriate initial imaging modality, and O-RADS US can accurately help to characterize most adnexal lesions. MRI is a valuable adjunct imaging tool to US, and O-RADS MRI can help to both confirm a benign diagnosis and accurately stratify lesions that are at risk for malignancy. This article will review the O-RADS US and MRI systems, highlight their similarities and differences, and provide an overview of the interplay between the systems. When used together, the O-RADS US and MRI systems can help to accurately diagnose benign lesions, assess the risk of malignancy in lesions suspicious for malignancy, and triage patients for optimal management.
卵巢-附件报告和数据系统(O-RADS)是一个以证据为基础的临床支持系统,用于评估中等风险女性的卵巢和附件病变。该系统包含 US 和 MRI 两部分,具有独立但互补的词典和评估类别,可用于分配恶性肿瘤风险。US 是一种合适的初始成像方式,O-RADS US 可以准确帮助确定大多数附件病变的特征。核磁共振成像是 US 的重要辅助成像工具,O-RADS 核磁共振成像可帮助确诊良性病变,并对有恶变风险的病变进行准确分层。本文将回顾 O-RADS US 和 MRI 系统,强调它们的异同,并概述这两个系统之间的相互作用。O-RADS US 和 MRI 系统结合使用,有助于准确诊断良性病变,评估恶性可疑病变的恶性风险,并对患者进行分流,以便进行最佳治疗。
{"title":"The Roles of Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System US and Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System MRI in the Evaluation of Adnexal Lesions.","authors":"Krupa K Patel-Lippmann, Akshya Gupta, Marisa F Martin, Catherine H Phillips, Katherine E Maturen, Priyanka Jha, Elizabeth A Sadowski, Erica B Stein","doi":"10.1148/radiol.233332","DOIUrl":"10.1148/radiol.233332","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) is an evidence-based clinical support system for ovarian and adnexal lesion assessment in women of average risk. The system has both US and MRI components with separate but complementary lexicons and assessment categories to assign the risk of malignancy. US is an appropriate initial imaging modality, and O-RADS US can accurately help to characterize most adnexal lesions. MRI is a valuable adjunct imaging tool to US, and O-RADS MRI can help to both confirm a benign diagnosis and accurately stratify lesions that are at risk for malignancy. This article will review the O-RADS US and MRI systems, highlight their similarities and differences, and provide an overview of the interplay between the systems. When used together, the O-RADS US and MRI systems can help to accurately diagnose benign lesions, assess the risk of malignancy in lesions suspicious for malignancy, and triage patients for optimal management.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142005115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vasiliki Mallikourti, P James Ross, Oliver Maier, German Guzman-Gutierrez, Edit Franko, David J Lurie, Lionel M Broche, Mary Joan Macleod
Background Field-cycling imaging (FCI) is a new technology developed at the University of Aberdeen that measures change in T1 relaxation time constant of tissues over a range of low magnetic field strengths (0.2-200 mT) by rapidly switching between different fields during the pulse sequence. This provides new sources of contrast, including some invisible to clinical MRI scanners, and may be a useful alternative imaging modality for stroke. Purpose To test whether a prototype whole-body FCI scanner can be used to identify infarct regions in patients with subacute ischemic stroke. Materials and Methods This prospective study screened consecutive adult patients admitted to a single center stroke unit from February 2018 to March 2020 and April to December 2021. Included participants with confirmed ischemic stroke underwent FCI 1-6 days after ictus. FCI scans were obtained at four to six evolution fields between 0.2 mT and 0.2 T, with five evolution times from 5 to 546 msec. T1 maps were generated. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare infarct region and contralateral unaffected brain, and Spearman rank correlation was used to examine associations between infarct to contralateral tissue contrast ratio and field strengths. Two independent readers blinded to clinical images rated the FCI scans. Results Nine participants (mean age, 62 years ± 16 [SD]; all male) successfully completed FCI. FCI scans below 0.2 T exhibited hyperintense T1 regions corresponding to the infarct region identified at baseline imaging, visually confirmed with 86% interrater agreement (Cohen κ = 0.69). Infarct to contralateral tissue contrast ratio increased as magnetic field decreased between 0.2 mT and 0.2 T (r[24] = -0.68; P < .001). T1 dispersion slopes differed between infarct and unaffected tissues (median, 0.23 [IQR, 0.18-0.37] vs 0.35 [IQR, 0.27-0.43]; P = .03). Conclusion Whole-brain FCI can be used to identify subacute ischemic stroke by T1 relaxation mechanisms at field strengths as low as 0.2 mT. Research Registry no. 1813 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article.
{"title":"Field-Cycling MRI for Identifying Minor Ischemic Stroke Below 0.2 T.","authors":"Vasiliki Mallikourti, P James Ross, Oliver Maier, German Guzman-Gutierrez, Edit Franko, David J Lurie, Lionel M Broche, Mary Joan Macleod","doi":"10.1148/radiol.232972","DOIUrl":"10.1148/radiol.232972","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Field-cycling imaging (FCI) is a new technology developed at the University of Aberdeen that measures change in T1 relaxation time constant of tissues over a range of low magnetic field strengths (0.2-200 mT) by rapidly switching between different fields during the pulse sequence. This provides new sources of contrast, including some invisible to clinical MRI scanners, and may be a useful alternative imaging modality for stroke. Purpose To test whether a prototype whole-body FCI scanner can be used to identify infarct regions in patients with subacute ischemic stroke. Materials and Methods This prospective study screened consecutive adult patients admitted to a single center stroke unit from February 2018 to March 2020 and April to December 2021. Included participants with confirmed ischemic stroke underwent FCI 1-6 days after ictus. FCI scans were obtained at four to six evolution fields between 0.2 mT and 0.2 T, with five evolution times from 5 to 546 msec. T1 maps were generated. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare infarct region and contralateral unaffected brain, and Spearman rank correlation was used to examine associations between infarct to contralateral tissue contrast ratio and field strengths. Two independent readers blinded to clinical images rated the FCI scans. Results Nine participants (mean age, 62 years ± 16 [SD]; all male) successfully completed FCI. FCI scans below 0.2 T exhibited hyperintense T1 regions corresponding to the infarct region identified at baseline imaging, visually confirmed with 86% interrater agreement (Cohen κ = 0.69). Infarct to contralateral tissue contrast ratio increased as magnetic field decreased between 0.2 mT and 0.2 T (<i>r</i>[24] = -0.68; <i>P</i> < .001). T1 dispersion slopes differed between infarct and unaffected tissues (median, 0.23 [IQR, 0.18-0.37] vs 0.35 [IQR, 0.27-0.43]; <i>P</i> = .03). Conclusion Whole-brain FCI can be used to identify subacute ischemic stroke by T1 relaxation mechanisms at field strengths as low as 0.2 mT. Research Registry no. 1813 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142073673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Emerging AI Autonomy: Reducing the Burden of Unremarkable Examinations.","authors":"Soon Ho Yoon, Eui Jin Hwang","doi":"10.1148/radiol.241490","DOIUrl":"10.1148/radiol.241490","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142005107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Phillip H Kuo, Michael J Morris, Jacob Hesterman, A Tuba Kendi, Kambiz Rahbar, Xiao X Wei, Bruno Fang, Nabil Adra, Rohan Garje, Jeff M Michalski, Kim Chi, Johann de Bono, Karim Fizazi, Bernd Krause, Oliver Sartor, Scott T Tagawa, Samson Ghebremariam, Marcia Brackman, Connie C Wong, Ana M Catafau, Taylor Benson, Andrew J Armstrong, Ken Herrmann
Background Lutetium 177 [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617) is a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Quantitative PSMA PET/CT analysis could provide information on 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment benefits. Purpose To explore the association between quantitative baseline gallium 68 [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (68Ga-PSMA-11) PET/CT parameters and treatment response and outcomes in the VISION trial. Materials and Methods This was an exploratory secondary analysis of the VISION trial. Eligible participants were randomized (June 2018 to October 2019) in a 2:1 ratio to 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy (7.4 GBq every 6 weeks for up to six cycles) plus standard of care (SOC) or to SOC only. Baseline 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET parameters, including the mean and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmean and SUVmax), PSMA-positive tumor volume, and tumor load, were extracted from five anatomic regions and the whole body. Associations of quantitative PET parameters with radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and prostate-specific antigen response were investigated using univariable and multivariable analyses (with treatment as the only other covariate). Outcomes were assessed in subgroups based on SUVmean quartiles. Results Quantitative PET parameters were well balanced between study arms for the 826 participants included. The median whole-body tumor SUVmean was 7.6 (IQR, 5.8-9.9). Whole-body tumor SUVmean was the best predictor of 177Lu-PSMA-617 efficacy, with a hazard ratio (HR) range of 0.86-1.43 for all outcomes (all P < .001). A 1-unit whole-body tumor SUVmean increase was associated with a 12% and 10% decrease in risk of an rPFS event and death, respectively. 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SOC prolonged rPFS and OS in all SUVmean quartiles versus SOC only, with no identifiable optimum among participants receiving 177Lu-PSMA-617. Higher baseline PSMA-positive tumor volume and tumor load were associated with worse rPFS (HR range, 1.44-1.53 [P < .05] and 1.02-1.03 [P < .001], respectively) and OS (HR range, 1.36-2.12 [P < .006] and 1.04 [P < .001], respectively). Conclusion Baseline 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT whole-body tumor SUVmean was the best predictor of 177Lu-PSMA-617 efficacy in participants in the VISION trial. Improvements in rPFS and OS with 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SOC were greater among participants with higher whole-body tumor SUVmean, with evidence for benefit at all SUVmean levels. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03511664 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article.
{"title":"Quantitative <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET and Clinical Outcomes in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Following <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617 (VISION Trial).","authors":"Phillip H Kuo, Michael J Morris, Jacob Hesterman, A Tuba Kendi, Kambiz Rahbar, Xiao X Wei, Bruno Fang, Nabil Adra, Rohan Garje, Jeff M Michalski, Kim Chi, Johann de Bono, Karim Fizazi, Bernd Krause, Oliver Sartor, Scott T Tagawa, Samson Ghebremariam, Marcia Brackman, Connie C Wong, Ana M Catafau, Taylor Benson, Andrew J Armstrong, Ken Herrmann","doi":"10.1148/radiol.233460","DOIUrl":"10.1148/radiol.233460","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Lutetium 177 [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (<sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617) is a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Quantitative PSMA PET/CT analysis could provide information on <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617 treatment benefits. Purpose To explore the association between quantitative baseline gallium 68 [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (<sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11) PET/CT parameters and treatment response and outcomes in the VISION trial. Materials and Methods This was an exploratory secondary analysis of the VISION trial. Eligible participants were randomized (June 2018 to October 2019) in a 2:1 ratio to <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617 therapy (7.4 GBq every 6 weeks for up to six cycles) plus standard of care (SOC) or to SOC only. Baseline <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET parameters, including the mean and maximum standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>mean</sub> and SUV<sub>max</sub>), PSMA-positive tumor volume, and tumor load, were extracted from five anatomic regions and the whole body. Associations of quantitative PET parameters with radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and prostate-specific antigen response were investigated using univariable and multivariable analyses (with treatment as the only other covariate). Outcomes were assessed in subgroups based on SUV<sub>mean</sub> quartiles. Results Quantitative PET parameters were well balanced between study arms for the 826 participants included. The median whole-body tumor SUV<sub>mean</sub> was 7.6 (IQR, 5.8-9.9). Whole-body tumor SUV<sub>mean</sub> was the best predictor of <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617 efficacy, with a hazard ratio (HR) range of 0.86-1.43 for all outcomes (all <i>P</i> < .001). A 1-unit whole-body tumor SUV<sub>mean</sub> increase was associated with a 12% and 10% decrease in risk of an rPFS event and death, respectively. <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617 plus SOC prolonged rPFS and OS in all SUV<sub>mean</sub> quartiles versus SOC only, with no identifiable optimum among participants receiving <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617. Higher baseline PSMA-positive tumor volume and tumor load were associated with worse rPFS (HR range, 1.44-1.53 [<i>P</i> < .05] and 1.02-1.03 [<i>P</i> < .001], respectively) and OS (HR range, 1.36-2.12 [<i>P</i> < .006] and 1.04 [<i>P</i> < .001], respectively). Conclusion Baseline <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT whole-body tumor SUV<sub>mean</sub> was the best predictor of <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617 efficacy in participants in the VISION trial. Improvements in rPFS and OS with <sup>177</sup>Lu-PSMA-617 plus SOC were greater among participants with higher whole-body tumor SUV<sub>mean</sub>, with evidence for benefit at all SUV<sub>mean</sub> levels. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03511664 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366674/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142005112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Proposed Updates to the First-Trimester US Reporting Lexicon: A Laudable Goal.","authors":"Leslie M Scoutt, Mary E Norton","doi":"10.1148/radiol.242013","DOIUrl":"10.1148/radiol.242013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366668/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142073746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Medium Vessel Occlusions: The Next Frontier in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.","authors":"Joan C Wojak","doi":"10.1148/radiol.241565","DOIUrl":"10.1148/radiol.241565","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141894184","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Adam A Dmytriw, Sherief Ghozy, Hamza Adel Salim, Basel Musmar, James E Siegler, Hassan Kobeissi, Hamza Shaikh, Jane Khalife, Mohamad Abdalkader, Piers Klein, Thanh N Nguyen, Jeremy J Heit, Robert W Regenhardt, Nicole M Cancelliere, Kareem El Naamani, Abdelaziz Amllay, Lukas Meyer, Anne Dusart, Flavio Bellante, Géraud Forestier, Aymeric Rouchaud, Suzana Saleme, Charbel Mounayer, Jens Fiehler, Anna Luisa Kühn, Ajit S Puri, Christian Dyzmann, Peter T Kan, Marco Colasurdo, Gaultier Marnat, Jérôme Berge, Xavier Barreau, Igor Sibon, Simona Nedelcu, Nils Henninger, Thomas R Marotta, Christopher J Stapleton, James D Rabinov, Takahiro Ota, Shogo Dofuku, Leonard L L Yeo, Benjamin Y Q Tan, Juan Carlos Martinez-Gutierrez, Sergio Salazar-Marioni, Sunil Sheth, Leonardo Renieri, Carolina Capirossi, Ashkan Mowla, Nimer Adeeb, Hugo H Cuellar-Saenz, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris, Pascal Jabbour, Priyank Khandelwal, Arundhati Biswas, Frédéric Clarençon, Mahmoud Elhorany, Kevin Premat, Iacopo Valente, Alessandro Pedicelli, João Pedro Filipe, Ricardo Varela, Miguel Quintero-Consuegra, Nestor R Gonzalez, Markus A Möhlenbruch, Jessica Jesser, Vincent Costalat, Adrien Ter Schiphorst, Vivek Yedavalli, Pablo Harker, Lina M Chervak, Yasmin Aziz, Benjamin Gory, Christian Paul Stracke, Constantin Hecker, Ramanathan Kadirvel, Monika Killer-Oberpfalzer, Christoph J Griessenauer, Ajith J Thomas, Cheng-Yang Hsieh, David S Liebeskind, Răzvan Alexandru Radu, Andrea M Alexandre, Illario Tancredi, Tobias D Faizy, Robert Fahed, Charlotte S Weyland, Boris Lubicz, Aman B Patel, Vitor Mendes Pereira, Adrien Guenego