Quality Management in Health Care最新文献

Background and objective: In an effort to limit the risks associated with medical radiation exposure, the last century witnessed the development of dose control mechanisms, recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection. This organization recommends the optimization of radiation protection to provide the highest level of safety that may reasonably be achievable. Adhering to the "as low as reasonably achievable" principle, the purpose of this study was to monitor the 18 F-FDG injected activity in PET and optimize the radiation protection through an internal audit process. This monitoring allows the identification of opportunities for improvement in patient care and safety, as well as to establish a periodic review of the medical unit reference levels.

Methods: The methodology is based on short run Quesenberry (Q) statistics and normalized nonconstant sample size (Z-chart) control charts. Anonymized data from 512 patients were selected from a set of 18 F-FDG PET/CT (Siemens, Biograph 6) examinations performed during 10 months. The analyzed variable was the ratio between the 18 F-FDG injected activity (MBq) and patient weight (kg).

Results: Mean injected 18 F-FDG activity was 347.811 ± 64.967 MBq corresponding to a mean effective dose of 6.608 ± 1.234 mSv. The ratio between the 18 F-FDG injected activity and the body mass of patients was reduced from 5.243 ± 0.716 to 5.171 ± 0.672 MBq/kg during the statistical data analysis. The study demonstrates that control charts can be a useful tool to signal situations where patients receive an activity significantly different from the standard practice in a medical unit.

Conclusion: The use of joint control charts is a suitable tool for detecting nonoptimized radiopharmaceutical administration. This analysis provides opportunities to evaluate and improve the quality of practice in nuclear medicine. This methodology constitutes an internal audit that may help health care professionals to make appropriate decisions to ensure all patients receive the safest and most appropriate care.

Background and objectives: Quality improvement (QI) and simulation employ complementary approaches to improve the care provided to patients. There is a significant opportunity to leverage these disciplines, yet little is known about how they are utilized in concert. The purpose of this study is to explore how QI and simulation have been used together in health care.

Methods: This scoping review includes studies published between 2015 and 2021 in 4 databases: CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus.

Results: The search yielded 921 unique articles.18 articles met the inclusion criteria and specifically described QI and simulation collaborative projects. Of the 18 articles, 28% focused on improvements in patient care, 17% on educational interventions, 17% on the identification of latent safety threats (LSTs) that could have an impact on clinical care, 11% on the creation of new processes, 11% on checklist creation, and 6% on both LST identification and educational intervention. The review revealed that 61% of the included studies demonstrated a concurrent integration of simulation and QI activities, while 33% used a sequential approach.

Conclusions: There is a paucity of studies detailing the robust and synergistic use of QI and simulation. The findings of this review suggest a positive impact on patient safety when QI and simulation are used in tandem. The systematic integration of these disciplines and the use of established reporting guidelines can promote patient safety in practice and in the literature.

Background and objectives: Early discharge of patients has become standard work in acute care settings to reduce inpatient length of stay (LOS), improve patient flow, and reduce boarding in the emergency department (ED).

Retrospective analysis of outcomes from a "discharge by 11 am " program at an academic medical center from January 1, 2020, to June 30, 2022. The analysis addresses the effects of a discharge by 11 am goal on time from discharge order release to patient discharge, ED boarding, LOS, and observed-to-expected LOS.

Methods: Patient-level electronic health record data included discharge order entry time, discharge time, LOS, and diagnosis-related group geometric LOS (GMLOS). Additional unit-level data for ED boarding volumes and hours were included. Analyses were conducted at the hospital and unit levels where indicated.

Results: Patients with a discharge order by 9 am have longer mean hours from order to discharge than patients without a discharge order by 9 am (9.04 vs 2.48 hours, P < .001) ED boarding total ( R2  = 46.2%, P ≤ .001), percentage ( R2  = 50.4%, P ≤ .001), median minutes ( R2  = 24.6%, P = .005), and total minutes ( R2  = 40.8%, P ≤ .001) all increased as discharge by 11 am performance improved. The mean LOS is longer for the discharge by 11 am group than the non-discharge by 11 am group -1.67; 95% CI, -2.03 to -1.28, P < .001). Discharge by 11 am patients had a LOS/GMLOS ratio 21.9% higher than the non-discharge by 11 am cohort (difference -0.31; 95% CI, -0.36 to -0.26, P < .001).

Conclusions: Discharge order entry and release by 9 am and patient physically discharged by 11 am initiatives demonstrate a statistical increase in time from discharge order to discharge time, ED boarding, LOS, and observed-to-expected LOS.

Background and objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic caused a significant strain on world health care systems. The lack of trained and experienced staff was a complicated issue during the pandemic. To overcome insufficient staffing problems, the intrahospital transfer (IHT) strategy was implemented at Milad Hospital in Tehran during COVID-19. We evaluated the effectiveness of the IHT strategy in order to determine whether the strategy should be continued post-COVID.

Methods: Six supervisors with experience in COVID-19 wards and the IHT strategy were consulted to identify the advantages of continuing the IHT strategy and to evaluate the success and continuation of IHT factors. Then, the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method was used to establish a network of influence relationships among IHT strategy factors' success.

Results: The result showed that all criteria except increasing patient satisfaction (C1) and reducing waste of time (C8) are cause-and-effect criteria that affected other criteria.

Conclusion: The research findings have implications for improving the day-to-day experience of staff navigating transfers of patients between wards and paraclinic units. This study also highlights the theoretical value of the cross-disciplinary integration of medical decision issues and multiple-attribute decision-making methodologies.

Background and objectives: A work environment where employees feel comfortable taking chances without fear and with sufficient protection from retaliation is psychologically safe. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of leader training for nurse managers on psychological safety of clinical registered nurses.

Methods: The study was designed a longitudinal outcomes approach to assess nurse leader intervention (classes on leadership methods and psychological safety) with pre- and post-intervention measurement of nurse psychological safety at each time point.

Results: The intervention and nurse leader rounding were shown to increase individual psychological safety climate scores of clinical nurses.

Conclusion: Psychological safety is an important component to consider in a nursing leadership role. Leadership interventions that focus on the tenets of psychological safety and include methods of being present, such as nurse leader rounding, can foster a sense of a psychologically safe environment for clinical registered nurses.