Fiona Schweitzer, Maximilian Palmié, O. Gassmann, Jonas Kahlert, Tobias Roeth
{"title":"Open innovation for institutional entrepreneurship: how incumbents induce institutional change to advance autonomous driving","authors":"Fiona Schweitzer, Maximilian Palmié, O. Gassmann, Jonas Kahlert, Tobias Roeth","doi":"10.1111/radm.12490","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12490","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21040,"journal":{"name":"R&D Management","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83943814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Competing in the Age of AI. By MarcoIansiti and KarimLakhani. Harvard Business Review Press: Boston, MA, 2020, ISBN‐13 978‐1633697621, hardback, £18, pp. 288.","authors":"J. Klein","doi":"10.1111/RADM.12489","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/RADM.12489","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21040,"journal":{"name":"R&D Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2021-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/RADM.12489","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48427637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jin Chen, A. D. Minin, T. Minshall, Yu-Shan Su, Lan Xue, Yuan Zhou
1 School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. chenjin@sem.tsinghua. edu.cn 2 Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna di Pisa, Institute of Management, Pisa, Italy. alberto.diminin@santannapisa.it 3 Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. thwm100@cam.ac.uk 4 School of Technology and Engineering, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan. yssu@ntnu.edu.tw 5 School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, xuelan@tsinghua.edu.cn, zhou_yuan@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn
{"title":"Introduction to the Special Issue on the New Silk Road of Innovation: R&D Networks, Knowledge Diffusions, and Open Innovation","authors":"Jin Chen, A. D. Minin, T. Minshall, Yu-Shan Su, Lan Xue, Yuan Zhou","doi":"10.1111/RADM.12479","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/RADM.12479","url":null,"abstract":"1 School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. chenjin@sem.tsinghua. edu.cn 2 Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna di Pisa, Institute of Management, Pisa, Italy. alberto.diminin@santannapisa.it 3 Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. thwm100@cam.ac.uk 4 School of Technology and Engineering, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan. yssu@ntnu.edu.tw 5 School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, xuelan@tsinghua.edu.cn, zhou_yuan@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn","PeriodicalId":21040,"journal":{"name":"R&D Management","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81548252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vesna Vlaisavljevic, S. Gopalakrishnan, Haisu Zhang, Carmen Cabello‐Medina, Melodi Guilbault
{"title":"Dancing with wolves: how R&D human capital can benefit from coopetition","authors":"Vesna Vlaisavljevic, S. Gopalakrishnan, Haisu Zhang, Carmen Cabello‐Medina, Melodi Guilbault","doi":"10.1111/RADM.12483","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/RADM.12483","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21040,"journal":{"name":"R&D Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/RADM.12483","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49238168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The effects of crowdsourcing contribution type and temporal consistency on new product development success","authors":"Matthew O'Hern, Billur Akdeniz, Shuili Du","doi":"10.1111/RADM.12481","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/RADM.12481","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21040,"journal":{"name":"R&D Management","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83379634","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study adopts a resilience perspective to explain how companies managed to contribute innovative solutions to fight the COVID‐19 crisis. We studied how five companies operating in different industries (three in automotive, one in printing, and one in rubber and plastic products manufacturing) managed to reorganize activities and employ their R&D and innovation capabilities to enhance their resilience. Simultaneously, they increased the health system’s capacity to cope with the outbreak. Through a qualitative inductive study, based on interviews with company managers, we found that the firms mobilized their resources and capabilities to expand their ability to adapt and cope with adversity at the organizational level. In addition, moved by the sensitivity to the extreme context and a perceived sense of urgency, the firms deployed the same endowments to strengthen the community’s response to a crisis. Our study shows that an organization can directly and positively foster the broader social system’s resilience. This study contributes to the innovation literature by identifying innovation capabilities as fundamental antecedents of resilience building for organizational response, paving the way for strengthening the link between resilience and innovation.
{"title":"Being resilient for society: evidence from companies that leveraged their resources and capabilities to fight the COVID‐19 crisis","authors":"M. Bergami, M. Corsino, Antonio Daood, P. Giuri","doi":"10.1111/radm.12480","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12480","url":null,"abstract":"This study adopts a resilience perspective to explain how companies managed to contribute innovative solutions to fight the COVID‐19 crisis. We studied how five companies operating in different industries (three in automotive, one in printing, and one in rubber and plastic products manufacturing) managed to reorganize activities and employ their R&D and innovation capabilities to enhance their resilience. Simultaneously, they increased the health system’s capacity to cope with the outbreak. Through a qualitative inductive study, based on interviews with company managers, we found that the firms mobilized their resources and capabilities to expand their ability to adapt and cope with adversity at the organizational level. In addition, moved by the sensitivity to the extreme context and a perceived sense of urgency, the firms deployed the same endowments to strengthen the community’s response to a crisis. Our study shows that an organization can directly and positively foster the broader social system’s resilience. This study contributes to the innovation literature by identifying innovation capabilities as fundamental antecedents of resilience building for organizational response, paving the way for strengthening the link between resilience and innovation.","PeriodicalId":21040,"journal":{"name":"R&D Management","volume":"28 1","pages":"235 - 254"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2021-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76031505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Zizhen Geng, Yanfen Wang, Jinjie Xue, H. Tang, Hongtao Liu
{"title":"Motivating R&D team creativity: the social cognitive effect of external developmental feedback and internal goal interdependence","authors":"Zizhen Geng, Yanfen Wang, Jinjie Xue, H. Tang, Hongtao Liu","doi":"10.1111/RADM.12482","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/RADM.12482","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21040,"journal":{"name":"R&D Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2021-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/RADM.12482","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45346808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Carl‐Magnus Behr, Georgia Anne Semple, T. Minshall
The COVID‐19 pandemic caused severe ventilator shortages in many healthcare systems worldwide. The UK government reacted to this with a three‐pronged approach of importing, up‐scaling existing production and supporting new design projects. The latter two parts – labelled the UK Ventilator Challenge – included over 50 companies from various sectors including the automotive and aerospace industries. Nine multi‐partner consortia and five single‐company projects were initiated with varying approaches. This study explores lessons learned during the setup and management of these medical device designs and manufacturing consortia. A qualitative survey methodology was employed, and 32 semi‐structured stakeholder interviews were conducted. The primary data was triangulated through the collection of 42 secondary data sources such as webinars and radio interviews. Transcription and a three‐step data analysis process of thematic coding identified six lessons learned. The analysis of the data showed that a strong, appealing common goal can enable employee motivation and trust as well as align priorities across all companies involved. This facilitates the involvement and fruitful collaboration of companies with varying sizes and fields of expertise. Furthermore, selecting the most suitable employees with specialist knowledge for high‐priority projects and empowering them to make decisions can have a positive effect on project performance. The findings from the study complement existing literature on new product development and crisis management processes. In addition, the results uncover potential long‐term effects such as more openness for cross‐sector collaborations, which can serve as interesting sources for further research.
{"title":"Rapid setup and management of medical device design and manufacturing consortia: experiences from the COVID‐19 crisis in the UK","authors":"Carl‐Magnus Behr, Georgia Anne Semple, T. Minshall","doi":"10.1111/radm.12475","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12475","url":null,"abstract":"The COVID‐19 pandemic caused severe ventilator shortages in many healthcare systems worldwide. The UK government reacted to this with a three‐pronged approach of importing, up‐scaling existing production and supporting new design projects. The latter two parts – labelled the UK Ventilator Challenge – included over 50 companies from various sectors including the automotive and aerospace industries. Nine multi‐partner consortia and five single‐company projects were initiated with varying approaches. This study explores lessons learned during the setup and management of these medical device designs and manufacturing consortia. A qualitative survey methodology was employed, and 32 semi‐structured stakeholder interviews were conducted. The primary data was triangulated through the collection of 42 secondary data sources such as webinars and radio interviews. Transcription and a three‐step data analysis process of thematic coding identified six lessons learned. The analysis of the data showed that a strong, appealing common goal can enable employee motivation and trust as well as align priorities across all companies involved. This facilitates the involvement and fruitful collaboration of companies with varying sizes and fields of expertise. Furthermore, selecting the most suitable employees with specialist knowledge for high‐priority projects and empowering them to make decisions can have a positive effect on project performance. The findings from the study complement existing literature on new product development and crisis management processes. In addition, the results uncover potential long‐term effects such as more openness for cross‐sector collaborations, which can serve as interesting sources for further research.","PeriodicalId":21040,"journal":{"name":"R&D Management","volume":"7 1","pages":"220 - 234"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85861668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
S. Magistretti, C. Dell’Era, R. Verganti, M. Bianchi
Literature on Design Thinking has mainly focused on whether its key principles enhance performance in the development phase (the D of R&D) of the technological innovation process. However, it has dedicated scant attention to the earlier research phase (the R of R&D). This aspect is surprising, given that many innovations fail as a result of early research actions and decisions. This article examines how it is possible and desirable to apply Design Thinking to the research phase of the technological innovation process. How can Design Thinking support innovation, even when advanced breakthrough technologies are at stake, the market is distant, and product applications and specific user needs have not been identified yet? To respond to this question, we investigate the research work of the design center of a global electronics company that uses a design approach called Proxemics to envision future interactions between bodies (people), objects (technology), and spaces (context). Although Proxemics is consistent with and implements the human centeredness and experimentation principles of Design Thinking, results of this study show that its logics and tools are different from those used in Design Thinking in the D of R&D due to the more abstract the
{"title":"The contribution of Design Thinking to the R of R&D in technological innovation","authors":"S. Magistretti, C. Dell’Era, R. Verganti, M. Bianchi","doi":"10.1111/RADM.12478","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/RADM.12478","url":null,"abstract":"Literature on Design Thinking has mainly focused on whether its key principles enhance performance in the development phase (the D of R&D) of the technological innovation process. However, it has dedicated scant attention to the earlier research phase (the R of R&D). This aspect is surprising, given that many innovations fail as a result of early research actions and decisions. This article examines how it is possible and desirable to apply Design Thinking to the research phase of the technological innovation process. How can Design Thinking support innovation, even when advanced breakthrough technologies are at stake, the market is distant, and product applications and specific user needs have not been identified yet? To respond to this question, we investigate the research work of the design center of a global electronics company that uses a design approach called Proxemics to envision future interactions between bodies (people), objects (technology), and spaces (context). Although Proxemics is consistent with and implements the human centeredness and experimentation principles of Design Thinking, results of this study show that its logics and tools are different from those used in Design Thinking in the D of R&D due to the more abstract the","PeriodicalId":21040,"journal":{"name":"R&D Management","volume":"146 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2021-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86025551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study addresses innovation development with a focus on risk- taking, widely considered a relevant driver for the exploration and exploitation of new ideas. The study empirically examines the effects of risk- taking propensity on innovation performance and its antecedents. We consider the role of several key antecedents related to the organizational structure and the activities of firms aimed at encouraging employees to take risks in innovation. We performed an empirical survey within a global and innovation- oriented Swedish company to test our hypotheses. Correlation and linear regression analyses were used to analyze the collected data. The results highlight the significant effect of risk- taking on innovation performance and show that the availability of organizational resources, innovation support activities, clear innovation goals, and collaboration have a significant positive effect on risk- taking. However, contrary to the hypothesis, well- established innovation processes have a significant but negative effect on risk- taking and innovation performance. This study contributes to existing knowledge on the role of risk- taking for innovation, providing insights into designing organizational contexts that encourage an appropriate risk appetite in employees.
{"title":"Unveiling the role of risk‐taking in innovation: antecedents and effects","authors":"S. Giaccone, M. Magnusson","doi":"10.1111/RADM.12477","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/RADM.12477","url":null,"abstract":"This study addresses innovation development with a focus on risk- taking, widely considered a relevant driver for the exploration and exploitation of new ideas. The study empirically examines the effects of risk- taking propensity on innovation performance and its antecedents. We consider the role of several key antecedents related to the organizational structure and the activities of firms aimed at encouraging employees to take risks in innovation. We performed an empirical survey within a global and innovation- oriented Swedish company to test our hypotheses. Correlation and linear regression analyses were used to analyze the collected data. The results highlight the significant effect of risk- taking on innovation performance and show that the availability of organizational resources, innovation support activities, clear innovation goals, and collaboration have a significant positive effect on risk- taking. However, contrary to the hypothesis, well- established innovation processes have a significant but negative effect on risk- taking and innovation performance. This study contributes to existing knowledge on the role of risk- taking for innovation, providing insights into designing organizational contexts that encourage an appropriate risk appetite in employees.","PeriodicalId":21040,"journal":{"name":"R&D Management","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3,"publicationDate":"2021-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89947489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：