Roberto Farì, Marly van Assen, Raymundo Quintana, Philipp von Knebel Doeberitz, Benjamin Böttcher, Guido Ligabue, Alex Rezai, Max Schoebinger, George S K Fung, Carlo N De Cecco
Riaz Hussain, Joseph W Plummer, Abdullah S Bdaiwi, Matthew M Willmering, Elizabeth L Kramer, Laura L Walkup, Zackary I Cleveland
<p><p>Purpose To implement and evaluate two-dimensional spiral hyperpolarized xenon 129 (<sup>129</sup>Xe) ventilation MRI with flip-angle (FA) correction, as compared with conventional N4ITK (N4) correction, in healthy individuals and those with cystic fibrosis (CF). Materials and Methods In this prospective study, participants with mild CF and age-matched healthy control participants underwent <sup>129</sup>Xe ventilation MRI using both rapid spiral (approximately 3 seconds) and conventional Cartesian (approximately 10 seconds) acquisitions. Images were corrected using N4 bias correction, and ventilation defect percentage (VDP) was calculated using median-anchored generalized linear binning (mGLB). Separately, B<sub>1</sub> inhomogeneities in spiral images were FA-corrected and analyzed using mGLB. Gravitational gradients in ventilation were quantified from uncorrected and N4- and FA-corrected images in healthy participants. VDP from N4-corrected (VDP<sub>N4</sub>) and FA-corrected (VDP<sub>FA</sub>) images were compared between participant groups and against reader-segmented VDP (VDP<sub>RS</sub>). Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon signed rank test, Pearson correlation, and Bland-Altman analysis. Results The final analysis included 38 participants with CF (mean age, 16 years ± 6 [SD]; 20 female) and 25 healthy controls (mean age, 18 years ± 7; 13 male). Qualitatively, Cartesian and spiral acquisitions produced similar regional ventilation images. There was no evidence of a difference in VDP<sub>N4</sub> between acquisition types (Cartesian = 9.1% ± 8.1; spiral = 9.3% ± 8.7; <i>P</i> = .97) with strong correlation (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.95; <i>P</i> < .001) and no systemic bias (mean difference, -0.2%; 95% CI: 3.6, -3.9). FA correction removed coil-related inhomogeneities while preserving physiologic heterogeneity, including gravitational gradients that were removed by N4 correction (mean slope in healthy participants: FA-corrected = 0.026 <i>S</i><sub>Norm</sub>/cm ± 0.013; N4-corrected = 0.002 <i>S</i><sub>Norm</sub>/cm ± 0.001; <i>P</i> < .001). VDP<sub>N4</sub> and VDP<sub>FA</sub> were strongly correlated with VDP<sub>RS</sub> (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.94 and 0.95, respectively; <i>P</i> < .001 for both). Defect masks from FA-corrected images showed better agreement with reader segmentations compared with N4-corrected image-based defect masks (17% higher Dice score from FA-corrected images; mean Dice score: N4-corrected, 0.41 ± 0.31; FA-corrected, 0.48 ± 0.29; <i>P</i> =.001) and better depicted regional hypo- and hyperventilation. Conclusion Two-dimensional spiral acquisition combined with FA correction and mGLB analysis enabled rapid <sup>129</sup>Xe ventilation MRI, effectively mitigating inhomogeneities while preserving physiologic heterogeneity. This approach provided accurate and efficient quantification of ventilation abnormalities in both healthy individuals and individuals with CF. <b>Keywords:</b> MRI, Pulmonary, Lung, Xe
{"title":"Optimizing Xenon 129 Ventilation MRI in Cystic Fibrosis with Spiral Imaging and Flip-Angle Correction.","authors":"Riaz Hussain, Joseph W Plummer, Abdullah S Bdaiwi, Matthew M Willmering, Elizabeth L Kramer, Laura L Walkup, Zackary I Cleveland","doi":"10.1148/ryct.240574","DOIUrl":"10.1148/ryct.240574","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To implement and evaluate two-dimensional spiral hyperpolarized xenon 129 (<sup>129</sup>Xe) ventilation MRI with flip-angle (FA) correction, as compared with conventional N4ITK (N4) correction, in healthy individuals and those with cystic fibrosis (CF). Materials and Methods In this prospective study, participants with mild CF and age-matched healthy control participants underwent <sup>129</sup>Xe ventilation MRI using both rapid spiral (approximately 3 seconds) and conventional Cartesian (approximately 10 seconds) acquisitions. Images were corrected using N4 bias correction, and ventilation defect percentage (VDP) was calculated using median-anchored generalized linear binning (mGLB). Separately, B<sub>1</sub> inhomogeneities in spiral images were FA-corrected and analyzed using mGLB. Gravitational gradients in ventilation were quantified from uncorrected and N4- and FA-corrected images in healthy participants. VDP from N4-corrected (VDP<sub>N4</sub>) and FA-corrected (VDP<sub>FA</sub>) images were compared between participant groups and against reader-segmented VDP (VDP<sub>RS</sub>). Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon signed rank test, Pearson correlation, and Bland-Altman analysis. Results The final analysis included 38 participants with CF (mean age, 16 years ± 6 [SD]; 20 female) and 25 healthy controls (mean age, 18 years ± 7; 13 male). Qualitatively, Cartesian and spiral acquisitions produced similar regional ventilation images. There was no evidence of a difference in VDP<sub>N4</sub> between acquisition types (Cartesian = 9.1% ± 8.1; spiral = 9.3% ± 8.7; <i>P</i> = .97) with strong correlation (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.95; <i>P</i> < .001) and no systemic bias (mean difference, -0.2%; 95% CI: 3.6, -3.9). FA correction removed coil-related inhomogeneities while preserving physiologic heterogeneity, including gravitational gradients that were removed by N4 correction (mean slope in healthy participants: FA-corrected = 0.026 <i>S</i><sub>Norm</sub>/cm ± 0.013; N4-corrected = 0.002 <i>S</i><sub>Norm</sub>/cm ± 0.001; <i>P</i> < .001). VDP<sub>N4</sub> and VDP<sub>FA</sub> were strongly correlated with VDP<sub>RS</sub> (<i>r</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.94 and 0.95, respectively; <i>P</i> < .001 for both). Defect masks from FA-corrected images showed better agreement with reader segmentations compared with N4-corrected image-based defect masks (17% higher Dice score from FA-corrected images; mean Dice score: N4-corrected, 0.41 ± 0.31; FA-corrected, 0.48 ± 0.29; <i>P</i> =.001) and better depicted regional hypo- and hyperventilation. Conclusion Two-dimensional spiral acquisition combined with FA correction and mGLB analysis enabled rapid <sup>129</sup>Xe ventilation MRI, effectively mitigating inhomogeneities while preserving physiologic heterogeneity. This approach provided accurate and efficient quantification of ventilation abnormalities in both healthy individuals and individuals with CF. <b>Keywords:</b> MRI, Pulmonary, Lung, Xe","PeriodicalId":21168,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","volume":"7 5","pages":"e240574"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12588888/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145207508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Omar Dzaye, Alexander C Razavi, Yara A Jelwan, Allison W Peng, Jelani K Grant, Michael J Blaha
Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is a specific marker of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis and is strongly associated with short- and long-term atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. Although noncontrast electrocardiographically gated cardiac CT is the reference standard for quantification of CAC (approximately 1 mSv), studies have shown that CAC can also be qualitatively interpreted and quantified on noncardiac chest CT scans with similar prognostic value. While use of dedicated CAC scans is increasing, measurement of incidental CAC represents a major untapped opportunity for ASCVD prevention, given that nearly 20 times more chest CT examinations are performed annually in the United States than dedicated CAC scans. Incidental measurement of CAC at chest CT incurs no additional cost or radiation for patients and can identify those with significant CAC burden who may be inadequately treated with ASCVD risk reduction therapies. This review outlines the fundamentals of CAC scoring, with a focus on detection and quantification of incidental CAC. It details the technical approaches and challenges of incidental CAC assessment and provides recommendations for routine reporting, clinical advisories, and subsequent patient management. The review also presents first-hand experiences from a large academic medical center's initiative to standardize incidental CAC reporting. Future directions include the use of artificial intelligence to automate both basic and advanced CAC interpretation.
{"title":"Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring on Dedicated Cardiac CT and Noncardiac CT Scans.","authors":"Omar Dzaye, Alexander C Razavi, Yara A Jelwan, Allison W Peng, Jelani K Grant, Michael J Blaha","doi":"10.1148/ryct.240548","DOIUrl":"10.1148/ryct.240548","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is a specific marker of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis and is strongly associated with short- and long-term atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. Although noncontrast electrocardiographically gated cardiac CT is the reference standard for quantification of CAC (approximately 1 mSv), studies have shown that CAC can also be qualitatively interpreted and quantified on noncardiac chest CT scans with similar prognostic value. While use of dedicated CAC scans is increasing, measurement of incidental CAC represents a major untapped opportunity for ASCVD prevention, given that nearly 20 times more chest CT examinations are performed annually in the United States than dedicated CAC scans. Incidental measurement of CAC at chest CT incurs no additional cost or radiation for patients and can identify those with significant CAC burden who may be inadequately treated with ASCVD risk reduction therapies. This review outlines the fundamentals of CAC scoring, with a focus on detection and quantification of incidental CAC. It details the technical approaches and challenges of incidental CAC assessment and provides recommendations for routine reporting, clinical advisories, and subsequent patient management. The review also presents first-hand experiences from a large academic medical center's initiative to standardize incidental CAC reporting. Future directions include the use of artificial intelligence to automate both basic and advanced CAC interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21168,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","volume":"7 5","pages":"e240548"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12583114/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145081375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aaisha Ferkh, John King Khoo, Selma Hasific, Caroline Park, Emily Xing, Fionn Coughlan, Alexander Haenel, Abdulaziz Binzaid, Oliver Haidari, Mattea Lewis, Elina Khasanova, Anthony Chuang, David Meier, Stéphane Fournier, Philipp Blanke, Frank Scheuermeyer, Jonathon Leipsic, Damini Dey, Stephanie Sellers, Georgios Tzimas
Jong Hyuk Lee, Chang-Hoon Lee, Jayoun Kim, Seungho Lee, Jakob Weiss, Vineet K Raghu, Michael T Lu, Hugo J W L Aerts, Hye-Rin Kang, Ju Gang Nam, Chang Min Park, Jin Mo Goo, Hyungjin Kim