Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-01-10DOI: 10.22605/RRH8251
Richard Gavin MacGregor, Andrew Ross
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>South Africa has an inequitable distribution of health workers between the public and private sector, with rural areas being historically underserved. As rural background of health workers has been advocated as the strongest predictor of rural practice, the Umthombo Youth Development Foundation (UYDF) has invested in recruiting and training rural-origin health science students since 1999 as a way of addressing staff shortages at 15 district hospitals in northern KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa. UYDF's intervention is to support students to overcome their academic, social, and economic challenges and expose them annually to rural health practice. This study investigated the effects of various retention factors on the choice of where rural-origin UYDF graduates worked, namely in rural or urban, public or private settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was developed containing questions relevant to the retention of health workers and included: personal satisfaction; hospital resources and employment factors; professional development and support; and community integration, as well as the reasons for working where they do. Of the 317 eligible health science graduates invited to participate, 139 (44%) responded. Descriptive statistics were compiled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine percent of graduates were working at a rural public healthcare facility (PHCF), followed by 34% at an urban PHCF, and 11% in the private sector. All the respondents, wherever they worked, reported positively on their work, management support, colleagues, and ability to practise their skills. Graduates working at rural PHCFs reported that patient care was sometimes compromised due to lack of equipment or medicines, with staff shortages being greater than at urban PHCFs. All the graduates reported that they had insufficient time to interact with peers regarding difficult cases, while those at rural PHCFs lacked access to senior staff or specialists compared to those working at urban PHCFs or urban private practice. Lack of professional development opportunities was reported by graduates at rural PHCFs as a reason they may leave, while those at urban PHCFs cited the intention to specialise. Graduates no longer working at a rural hospital reported that the lack of funded posts at rural PHCFs was the main reason (39%), followed by the desire to specialise (29.6%). Graduates working at rural PHCFs cited the 'ability to serve their community' and being 'close to family and friends' as the main reason for working where they do, whereas those working at urban PHCFs cited 'good work experience'.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While nearly half of the rural-origin UYDF graduates surveyed continue to work in rural areas, this is considerably less than previously reported, indicating that rural-origin health workers are affected by retention factors. The lack of funded posts at rural PHCFs is a major barrier to the e
{"title":"The effects of various retention factors on the choice of where rural origin Umthombo Youth Development Foundation health science graduates work.","authors":"Richard Gavin MacGregor, Andrew Ross","doi":"10.22605/RRH8251","DOIUrl":"10.22605/RRH8251","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>South Africa has an inequitable distribution of health workers between the public and private sector, with rural areas being historically underserved. As rural background of health workers has been advocated as the strongest predictor of rural practice, the Umthombo Youth Development Foundation (UYDF) has invested in recruiting and training rural-origin health science students since 1999 as a way of addressing staff shortages at 15 district hospitals in northern KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa. UYDF's intervention is to support students to overcome their academic, social, and economic challenges and expose them annually to rural health practice. This study investigated the effects of various retention factors on the choice of where rural-origin UYDF graduates worked, namely in rural or urban, public or private settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was developed containing questions relevant to the retention of health workers and included: personal satisfaction; hospital resources and employment factors; professional development and support; and community integration, as well as the reasons for working where they do. Of the 317 eligible health science graduates invited to participate, 139 (44%) responded. Descriptive statistics were compiled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine percent of graduates were working at a rural public healthcare facility (PHCF), followed by 34% at an urban PHCF, and 11% in the private sector. All the respondents, wherever they worked, reported positively on their work, management support, colleagues, and ability to practise their skills. Graduates working at rural PHCFs reported that patient care was sometimes compromised due to lack of equipment or medicines, with staff shortages being greater than at urban PHCFs. All the graduates reported that they had insufficient time to interact with peers regarding difficult cases, while those at rural PHCFs lacked access to senior staff or specialists compared to those working at urban PHCFs or urban private practice. Lack of professional development opportunities was reported by graduates at rural PHCFs as a reason they may leave, while those at urban PHCFs cited the intention to specialise. Graduates no longer working at a rural hospital reported that the lack of funded posts at rural PHCFs was the main reason (39%), followed by the desire to specialise (29.6%). Graduates working at rural PHCFs cited the 'ability to serve their community' and being 'close to family and friends' as the main reason for working where they do, whereas those working at urban PHCFs cited 'good work experience'.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While nearly half of the rural-origin UYDF graduates surveyed continue to work in rural areas, this is considerably less than previously reported, indicating that rural-origin health workers are affected by retention factors. The lack of funded posts at rural PHCFs is a major barrier to the e","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":"24 1","pages":"8251"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139404232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-01-12DOI: 10.22605/RRH8306
Brie Turner, Shane Bullock, Sally Butler, Linda Ferrington, Michael Macartney, Laura Major, Lynn Monrouxe, Uchechukwu Levi Osuagwu, Phillipa Southwell, Lachlan Van Schaik, Georgina M Luscombe
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is now strong evidence to support the positive impact of place-based medical education on the recruitment and retention of the rural health workforce in Australia. Much of this work, however, has been undertaken in the context of 'extended rural clinical placement' - students undertaking part of their medical degree in a rural location. Until recently, there were only a few places in Australia in which students could undertake the entirety of their medical degree in a rural area. With the introduction of the Murray-Darling Medical Schools Network (MDMSN) initiative, this dynamic is changing. The MDMSN is part of the Stronger Rural Health Strategy and builds on the Australian Government's existing Rural Health Multidisciplinary Training Program to establish a network of rurally based medical programs in the Murray-Darling region. The MDMSN offers a unique opportunity to explore the effect of complete rural immersion during medical school on subsequent rural practice. This article describes the establishment of a research collaboration intended to ensure the harmonisation of research data collection from the outset of the MDMSN program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MDMSN research collaboration is a longitudinal, multi-university program of work to explore the effect of rurally based medical school programs in the Murray-Darling region. Initially it has been agreed that administrative student data will be collected from existing university datasets to help characterise this novel student cohort. Each university will then distribute an entry survey to all first-year MDMSN students. The survey will collect demographic information as well as information regarding rural background, preferences and future practice intention. Questions have been aligned with and adapted from the Medical Schools Outcomes Database survey, the Australian Bureau of Statistics, and from the literature. This information will be combined with graduate information from the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MDMSN research collaboration will work toward the co-design of research projects, to facilitate and progress multi-site research addressing nationally relevant research questions. Early research efforts are focused on our ability to better understand the new cohort of students embarking on rurally based medical education, their practice intentions and realisation. Subsequent work of the collaboration may lead to deeper understanding of the rural student experience, any effect of 'place', changes in student professional identity over time, and their relationship to subsequent rural practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MDMSN research collaboration is a proactive initiative that brings together data and experience from five new rurally based medical programs, and answers calls for multi-institution and longitudinal studies. It is uniquely placed to capture the impact of t
{"title":"The Murray-Darling Medical Schools Network Research Collaboration: protocol for a longitudinal, multi-university program of work to explore the effect of rurally based medical school programs in the Murray-Darling region.","authors":"Brie Turner, Shane Bullock, Sally Butler, Linda Ferrington, Michael Macartney, Laura Major, Lynn Monrouxe, Uchechukwu Levi Osuagwu, Phillipa Southwell, Lachlan Van Schaik, Georgina M Luscombe","doi":"10.22605/RRH8306","DOIUrl":"10.22605/RRH8306","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is now strong evidence to support the positive impact of place-based medical education on the recruitment and retention of the rural health workforce in Australia. Much of this work, however, has been undertaken in the context of 'extended rural clinical placement' - students undertaking part of their medical degree in a rural location. Until recently, there were only a few places in Australia in which students could undertake the entirety of their medical degree in a rural area. With the introduction of the Murray-Darling Medical Schools Network (MDMSN) initiative, this dynamic is changing. The MDMSN is part of the Stronger Rural Health Strategy and builds on the Australian Government's existing Rural Health Multidisciplinary Training Program to establish a network of rurally based medical programs in the Murray-Darling region. The MDMSN offers a unique opportunity to explore the effect of complete rural immersion during medical school on subsequent rural practice. This article describes the establishment of a research collaboration intended to ensure the harmonisation of research data collection from the outset of the MDMSN program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MDMSN research collaboration is a longitudinal, multi-university program of work to explore the effect of rurally based medical school programs in the Murray-Darling region. Initially it has been agreed that administrative student data will be collected from existing university datasets to help characterise this novel student cohort. Each university will then distribute an entry survey to all first-year MDMSN students. The survey will collect demographic information as well as information regarding rural background, preferences and future practice intention. Questions have been aligned with and adapted from the Medical Schools Outcomes Database survey, the Australian Bureau of Statistics, and from the literature. This information will be combined with graduate information from the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MDMSN research collaboration will work toward the co-design of research projects, to facilitate and progress multi-site research addressing nationally relevant research questions. Early research efforts are focused on our ability to better understand the new cohort of students embarking on rurally based medical education, their practice intentions and realisation. Subsequent work of the collaboration may lead to deeper understanding of the rural student experience, any effect of 'place', changes in student professional identity over time, and their relationship to subsequent rural practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MDMSN research collaboration is a proactive initiative that brings together data and experience from five new rurally based medical programs, and answers calls for multi-institution and longitudinal studies. It is uniquely placed to capture the impact of t","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":"24 1","pages":"8306"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139425381","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-01-28DOI: 10.22605/RRH8516
Sally West, Donna Franklin, Nichole Harvey, Alice Cairns
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In remote Australian hospitals there are no onsite paediatric intensive care units (PICUs), increasing the reliance on aeromedical retrieval to access tertiary care. Nasal high flow (NHF) therapy is an oxygen therapy used in tertiary hospitals to treat paediatric patients with respiratory conditions. In rural and remote Queensland, Australia, the use of NHF therapy is inconsistent and there are no guidelines on how this therapy should be implemented in practice. Therefore, three remote hospitals within the Torres Strait and Cape York commenced a project to improve consistent and equitable access to NHF therapy. Implementing NHF therapy in remote hospitals may improve health and social outcomes for children with acute respiratory distress. A clinical guideline for the use of NHF therapy in the three participating remote hospitals was published on 28 October 2021. This study aimed to develop a clinical guideline for the use of NHF therapy in three remote hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi technique was used to develop the guideline. Remote medicine and nursing clinicians at the three study sites, retrieval experts, a receiving tertiary-based paediatrician, PICU specialists and NHF therapy experts made up the expert panel of participants. These experts participated in an iterative round table discussion to develop remote-specific guidelines for the use of NHF therapy. Prior to the meeting, panellists were provided with an executive summary of the current literature on NHF therapy implementation with key questions for consideration. Participants were able to add relevant issues ad hoc. A final guideline representing the panellists' recommendations was submitted to the Torres and Cape Health Service for ratification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Remote-specific decisions on the following topics were produced: environment of care, nasogastric tube usage, timings of chest X-ray, automatic approvals to arrange courier services for pathology, medication use, staff training; staff ratios, observations regimes, both tertiary and local medical consultation frequency and the experience level of the medical officer required to attend to these consultations, location of the on-call medical officer, documentation, escalation of care considerations and disposition of the patient in relation to retrievals.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Decisions were made to mitigate two highly representative remote factors: delays in the workplace practices, such as time to arrange treatment locally and delays in retrievals; and burden of the lack of access to services, such as lack of access to trained staff, staffing levels on-shift, adequate oxygen and equipment/consumable supplies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The aim was to develop a clinical guideline that was contextualised to the remote hospital. This outcome was achieved by using a modified Delphi technique, with a panel of experts providing the de
{"title":"Nasal high flow therapy in remote hospitals: guideline development using a modified Delphi technique.","authors":"Sally West, Donna Franklin, Nichole Harvey, Alice Cairns","doi":"10.22605/RRH8516","DOIUrl":"10.22605/RRH8516","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In remote Australian hospitals there are no onsite paediatric intensive care units (PICUs), increasing the reliance on aeromedical retrieval to access tertiary care. Nasal high flow (NHF) therapy is an oxygen therapy used in tertiary hospitals to treat paediatric patients with respiratory conditions. In rural and remote Queensland, Australia, the use of NHF therapy is inconsistent and there are no guidelines on how this therapy should be implemented in practice. Therefore, three remote hospitals within the Torres Strait and Cape York commenced a project to improve consistent and equitable access to NHF therapy. Implementing NHF therapy in remote hospitals may improve health and social outcomes for children with acute respiratory distress. A clinical guideline for the use of NHF therapy in the three participating remote hospitals was published on 28 October 2021. This study aimed to develop a clinical guideline for the use of NHF therapy in three remote hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi technique was used to develop the guideline. Remote medicine and nursing clinicians at the three study sites, retrieval experts, a receiving tertiary-based paediatrician, PICU specialists and NHF therapy experts made up the expert panel of participants. These experts participated in an iterative round table discussion to develop remote-specific guidelines for the use of NHF therapy. Prior to the meeting, panellists were provided with an executive summary of the current literature on NHF therapy implementation with key questions for consideration. Participants were able to add relevant issues ad hoc. A final guideline representing the panellists' recommendations was submitted to the Torres and Cape Health Service for ratification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Remote-specific decisions on the following topics were produced: environment of care, nasogastric tube usage, timings of chest X-ray, automatic approvals to arrange courier services for pathology, medication use, staff training; staff ratios, observations regimes, both tertiary and local medical consultation frequency and the experience level of the medical officer required to attend to these consultations, location of the on-call medical officer, documentation, escalation of care considerations and disposition of the patient in relation to retrievals.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Decisions were made to mitigate two highly representative remote factors: delays in the workplace practices, such as time to arrange treatment locally and delays in retrievals; and burden of the lack of access to services, such as lack of access to trained staff, staffing levels on-shift, adequate oxygen and equipment/consumable supplies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The aim was to develop a clinical guideline that was contextualised to the remote hospital. This outcome was achieved by using a modified Delphi technique, with a panel of experts providing the de","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":"24 1","pages":"8516"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139571072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-01-01Epub Date: 2024-01-18DOI: 10.22605/RRH8244
Maria H Garrett, Denise Azar, Dianne Goeman, Mishael Thomas, Elizabeth A Craig, Darryl Maybery
Introduction: There is a lack of information about the experiences of people living with dementia and their carers, especially in rural and regional areas. Understanding these experiences helps to identify gaps and unmet needs within the health system and improve quality of care and outcomes for people living with dementia. The aim of this study was to improve our knowledge of dementia support needs. This included access to health and social care services and supports for people living with dementia and those who provide informal or formal support to someone living with dementia.
Methods: Interviews were conducted with 26 participants from the Gippsland region of Victoria, Australia with knowledge of dementia care. Purposive sampling engaged people with lived experience, carers/family members and health professionals delivering dementia care and social services. Discussions centred around participants' experiences of support services, the diagnosis process and what they thought was needed to improve the services and supports offered. Thematic analysis of the data was undertaken using the framework method.
Results: The interview data indicated that the needs of many people living with dementia and their carers were not currently being met. The themes were limited access to services and supports, including primary and specialist care, often impacted by lack of knowledge of care options, difficulty navigating the system and funding models as a barrier, leading to delays in getting a diagnosis and accessing specialist services; lack of holistic care to enable people living with dementia to 'live well'; and stigma impacted by a lack of knowledge of dementia among professionals and in the community. Relationship-centred care was described as a way to improve the lives of people living with dementia.
Conclusion: Key areas for improvement include increasing community awareness of dementia and available local services, more support to obtain an early dementia diagnosis, increased help to navigate the system, especially immediately after diagnosis, and easier access to appropriate home support services when they are needed. Other recommendations include person-centred care across settings - supported by funding models, more education and communication skills training for health professionals and care staff - and greater support for and increased recognition of carers.
{"title":"Health and social care needs of people living with dementia: a qualitative study of dementia support in the Victorian region of Gippsland, Australia.","authors":"Maria H Garrett, Denise Azar, Dianne Goeman, Mishael Thomas, Elizabeth A Craig, Darryl Maybery","doi":"10.22605/RRH8244","DOIUrl":"10.22605/RRH8244","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a lack of information about the experiences of people living with dementia and their carers, especially in rural and regional areas. Understanding these experiences helps to identify gaps and unmet needs within the health system and improve quality of care and outcomes for people living with dementia. The aim of this study was to improve our knowledge of dementia support needs. This included access to health and social care services and supports for people living with dementia and those who provide informal or formal support to someone living with dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interviews were conducted with 26 participants from the Gippsland region of Victoria, Australia with knowledge of dementia care. Purposive sampling engaged people with lived experience, carers/family members and health professionals delivering dementia care and social services. Discussions centred around participants' experiences of support services, the diagnosis process and what they thought was needed to improve the services and supports offered. Thematic analysis of the data was undertaken using the framework method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The interview data indicated that the needs of many people living with dementia and their carers were not currently being met. The themes were limited access to services and supports, including primary and specialist care, often impacted by lack of knowledge of care options, difficulty navigating the system and funding models as a barrier, leading to delays in getting a diagnosis and accessing specialist services; lack of holistic care to enable people living with dementia to 'live well'; and stigma impacted by a lack of knowledge of dementia among professionals and in the community. Relationship-centred care was described as a way to improve the lives of people living with dementia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Key areas for improvement include increasing community awareness of dementia and available local services, more support to obtain an early dementia diagnosis, increased help to navigate the system, especially immediately after diagnosis, and easier access to appropriate home support services when they are needed. Other recommendations include person-centred care across settings - supported by funding models, more education and communication skills training for health professionals and care staff - and greater support for and increased recognition of carers.</p>","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":"24 1","pages":"8244"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139484541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Beseler, Kim, Subramanian, Harris, Funkenbusch, Yoder, Robinson, Foster, Watanabe-Galloway
{"title":"Exploring barriers and promoters of CRC screening use among agricultural operators: a pilot study of an application of concept mapping","authors":"Beseler, Kim, Subramanian, Harris, Funkenbusch, Yoder, Robinson, Foster, Watanabe-Galloway","doi":"10.22605/rrh8413","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22605/rrh8413","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":"25 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138594206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-01Epub Date: 2023-12-05DOI: 10.22605/RRH8372
Robert W Owens, Thomas Carlyle Whittaker, Annie Galt, Kirsten Stoesser, Saskia Spiess, Matthew Jack Mervis, Andrew David Curtin, Elena Gardner, Dominik Ose
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The US is currently experiencing a maternal health crisis. Maternal morbidity and mortality in the US are higher than in other developed nations and continue to rise. Infant mortality, likewise, is higher in the US than in other developed nations. Limited availability of maternal health services, particularly in rural areas, contributes to this crisis. Maternal health outcomes are poorer, and maternal care workforce shortages are more severe in rural areas of the US. In rural areas where obstetric specialists are rare, many patients rely on family medicine physicians for maternity care. However, the number of family medicine physicians who provide maternal care services is decreasing, aggravating shortages. Calls have been made to build maternal care capacity in rural areas. The role family medicine will play in addressing the maternal health crisis is not clear. Maternal care shortages are complex issues resulting from multiple factors; likewise, efforts to build maternal health capacity are challenging and require multifaceted approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>With funding from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), the University of Utah seeks to address the shortage of quality maternity care in rural and underserved areas of Utah by strengthening partnerships, enhancing maternal care training of family medicine residents and obstetrics fellows, and improving the transition from training to rural practice for residents and fellows. This protocol describes the evaluation of the HRSA-funded project. The evaluation includes three components. Component 1 consists of qualitative interviews with a diverse group of maternal health providers, administrators, educators and academics, patients, and others. Interviews will be analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Component 2 is a survey of family medicine residents and obstetrics fellows, which aims to increase understanding of the factors and circumstances influencing intention to practice in rural or underserved areas and to provide maternal health services. Component 3 involves surveying fellowship alumni and tracking graduates to assess effectiveness of training programs in producing physicians who provide maternal health services in rural and underserved areas. Surveys will be analyzed with descriptive statistics including means, frequencies, and cross-tabulations. If sample size and participation provide sufficient power, statistical tests will be included in analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evaluation results will help to fill an important gap in research literature concerning outcomes of projects and initiatives designed to build maternal care capacity in rural areas of the US. In addition, results will provide valuable information regarding effective practices for building capacity, which can be adopted elsewhere to address maternal care shortages. Finally, results will help to define the role of family medicine in add
{"title":"Evaluating maternal health capacity building in rural and underserved areas: a research protocol.","authors":"Robert W Owens, Thomas Carlyle Whittaker, Annie Galt, Kirsten Stoesser, Saskia Spiess, Matthew Jack Mervis, Andrew David Curtin, Elena Gardner, Dominik Ose","doi":"10.22605/RRH8372","DOIUrl":"10.22605/RRH8372","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The US is currently experiencing a maternal health crisis. Maternal morbidity and mortality in the US are higher than in other developed nations and continue to rise. Infant mortality, likewise, is higher in the US than in other developed nations. Limited availability of maternal health services, particularly in rural areas, contributes to this crisis. Maternal health outcomes are poorer, and maternal care workforce shortages are more severe in rural areas of the US. In rural areas where obstetric specialists are rare, many patients rely on family medicine physicians for maternity care. However, the number of family medicine physicians who provide maternal care services is decreasing, aggravating shortages. Calls have been made to build maternal care capacity in rural areas. The role family medicine will play in addressing the maternal health crisis is not clear. Maternal care shortages are complex issues resulting from multiple factors; likewise, efforts to build maternal health capacity are challenging and require multifaceted approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>With funding from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), the University of Utah seeks to address the shortage of quality maternity care in rural and underserved areas of Utah by strengthening partnerships, enhancing maternal care training of family medicine residents and obstetrics fellows, and improving the transition from training to rural practice for residents and fellows. This protocol describes the evaluation of the HRSA-funded project. The evaluation includes three components. Component 1 consists of qualitative interviews with a diverse group of maternal health providers, administrators, educators and academics, patients, and others. Interviews will be analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Component 2 is a survey of family medicine residents and obstetrics fellows, which aims to increase understanding of the factors and circumstances influencing intention to practice in rural or underserved areas and to provide maternal health services. Component 3 involves surveying fellowship alumni and tracking graduates to assess effectiveness of training programs in producing physicians who provide maternal health services in rural and underserved areas. Surveys will be analyzed with descriptive statistics including means, frequencies, and cross-tabulations. If sample size and participation provide sufficient power, statistical tests will be included in analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evaluation results will help to fill an important gap in research literature concerning outcomes of projects and initiatives designed to build maternal care capacity in rural areas of the US. In addition, results will provide valuable information regarding effective practices for building capacity, which can be adopted elsewhere to address maternal care shortages. Finally, results will help to define the role of family medicine in add","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":"23 4","pages":"8372"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138482950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-01Epub Date: 2023-12-12DOI: 10.22605/RRH8351
Dereck L Salisbury, Wayne Warry, Joshua Fergen, Kirsten Cruikshank, Patricia D Soderlund, Kristen Jacklin
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Out of all the modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD), physical inactivity is the strongest. Rural residents have an increased risk for dementia and face significant barriers to accessing ADRD information, caregiving support, and memory-related services, which contributes to substandard care. Rural communities have greater barriers to participating in physical activity, and in particular exercise, due to lack of social support, travel/weather problems, and lack of facilities/equipment. The purpose of this pilot study was to implement and evaluate the feasibility and safety of a synchronous, remotely delivered, aerobic exercise (AEx) telerehabilitation program in persons with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) living in rural areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Minnesota Rehabilitation Intervention for Dementia Evasion for rural residents (MN RIDE) pilot study was one of five pilot studies conducted through the Center for Community Engaged Rural Dementia and Alzheimer's Research, conducted in collaboration with the Memory Keepers Medical Discovery Team. The Memory Keepers Medical Discovery Team employs a community-based participatory research model and uses a community advisory group, community-based researchers and a rural community engagement specialist to ensure research studies are aligned with rural community needs and to facilitate the recruitment of participants living in rural northern Minnesota. The MN RIDE study employed a single group, pretest-post-test design to test the feasibility and safety of an AEx-focused synchronous telerehabilitation program in rural-living middle-aged or older adults (>45 years) with SCD (indicated by answering yes to both, 'Do you perceive memory or cognitive difficulties?' and 'In the last two years, has your cognition or memory declined?'). All 36 AEx sessions (conducted over 12 weeks) were supervised remotely via smart devices and Zoom. The AEx program was classified as moderate intensity stationary cycling starting at a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) 11-12 or for 30-35 minutes in session 1, and was alternatively increased by 1-point RPE or 5-minute increments as tolerated up to RPE 12-14 for 50 minutes a session over time (by session 18). Secondarily, moderate intensity was defined as achieving an exercise heart rate of 64-76% of age-predicted maximum heart rate (HRmax). Feasibility and safety outcomes were assessed by session attendance, intensity adherence, presence of adverse events, and participant satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of the study sample (n=9) was 57.44±7.16 years (average age of SCD onset 53.44±7.47 years) with 14.00±5.57 years of education and 88.9% female. All patients completed the study, resulting in a dropout rate of 0%. Out of the possible 324 sessions scheduled, 276 were attended (85% session adherence). Average intensity metrics achieved over the AE
{"title":"The MN RIDE pilot: feasibility of a synchronous, remotely delivered, aerobic exercise training program for rural-dwelling adults with subjective cognitive decline.","authors":"Dereck L Salisbury, Wayne Warry, Joshua Fergen, Kirsten Cruikshank, Patricia D Soderlund, Kristen Jacklin","doi":"10.22605/RRH8351","DOIUrl":"10.22605/RRH8351","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Out of all the modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD), physical inactivity is the strongest. Rural residents have an increased risk for dementia and face significant barriers to accessing ADRD information, caregiving support, and memory-related services, which contributes to substandard care. Rural communities have greater barriers to participating in physical activity, and in particular exercise, due to lack of social support, travel/weather problems, and lack of facilities/equipment. The purpose of this pilot study was to implement and evaluate the feasibility and safety of a synchronous, remotely delivered, aerobic exercise (AEx) telerehabilitation program in persons with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) living in rural areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Minnesota Rehabilitation Intervention for Dementia Evasion for rural residents (MN RIDE) pilot study was one of five pilot studies conducted through the Center for Community Engaged Rural Dementia and Alzheimer's Research, conducted in collaboration with the Memory Keepers Medical Discovery Team. The Memory Keepers Medical Discovery Team employs a community-based participatory research model and uses a community advisory group, community-based researchers and a rural community engagement specialist to ensure research studies are aligned with rural community needs and to facilitate the recruitment of participants living in rural northern Minnesota. The MN RIDE study employed a single group, pretest-post-test design to test the feasibility and safety of an AEx-focused synchronous telerehabilitation program in rural-living middle-aged or older adults (>45 years) with SCD (indicated by answering yes to both, 'Do you perceive memory or cognitive difficulties?' and 'In the last two years, has your cognition or memory declined?'). All 36 AEx sessions (conducted over 12 weeks) were supervised remotely via smart devices and Zoom. The AEx program was classified as moderate intensity stationary cycling starting at a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) 11-12 or for 30-35 minutes in session 1, and was alternatively increased by 1-point RPE or 5-minute increments as tolerated up to RPE 12-14 for 50 minutes a session over time (by session 18). Secondarily, moderate intensity was defined as achieving an exercise heart rate of 64-76% of age-predicted maximum heart rate (HRmax). Feasibility and safety outcomes were assessed by session attendance, intensity adherence, presence of adverse events, and participant satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of the study sample (n=9) was 57.44±7.16 years (average age of SCD onset 53.44±7.47 years) with 14.00±5.57 years of education and 88.9% female. All patients completed the study, resulting in a dropout rate of 0%. Out of the possible 324 sessions scheduled, 276 were attended (85% session adherence). Average intensity metrics achieved over the AE","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":"23 4","pages":"8351"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138809206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-01Epub Date: 2023-12-03DOI: 10.22605/RRH8365
Daniel Pellegrini, Ellen Davies, Lucie Walters, Lisa White, Adam Montagu, James Padley
<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Therapeutic reasoning focuses on the decisions related to patient disposition and management. This is in contrast to diagnostic reasoning, which is the focus of much of the current discourse in the medical literature. Few studies relate to therapeutic reasoning, and even fewer relate to the rural and remote context. This project sought to explore the therapeutic reasoning used by rural generalists working in a small rural hospital setting in Australia, caring for patients for whom it was unclear if escalation of care, including admission or interhospital transfer, was needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted using an interpretivist approach. A simulation scenario was developed with rural generalists and experts in medical simulation to use as a test bed to explore the reasoning of the rural generalist participants. The simulation context was a small rural Australian hospital with resources and treatment options typical of those found in a similar real-life setting. A simulated patient and a registered nurse were embedded in the scenario. Participants needed to make decisions throughout the scenario regarding the simulated patient and two anticipated patients who were said to be coming to the department. The scenario was immediately followed by a semi-structured interview exploring participants' therapeutic reasoning when planning care for these three patients. An inductive content analysis approach was used to analyse the data, and a mental model was developed. The researchers then tested this mental model against the recordings of the participants' simulation scenarios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight rural generalists, with varying levels of experience, participated in this study. Through the semi-structured interviews, participants described five themes: assessing clinician capacity to manage patient needs; availability of local physical resources and team members; considering options for help when local management was not enough; patients' wishes and shared decision making; and anticipating future requirements. The mental model developed from these themes consisted of seven questions: 'What can I do for this patient locally and what are my limits?'; 'Who is in my team and who can I rely on?'; 'What are the advantages and disadvantages of local management vs transfer?'; 'Who else needs to be involved and what are their limits?;' 'How can we align the patient's wants with their needs?'; 'How do we adapt to the current and future situation?'; and 'How do I preserve the capacity of the health service to provide care?'</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study explored the therapeutic reasoning of rural generalists using a simulated multi-patient emergency scenario. The mental model developed serves as a starting point when discussing therapeutic reasoning and is likely to be useful when providing education to medical students and junior doctors who are working in rural and remote
{"title":"Insights into rural generalist therapeutic reasoning using a simulated multi-patient emergency scenario.","authors":"Daniel Pellegrini, Ellen Davies, Lucie Walters, Lisa White, Adam Montagu, James Padley","doi":"10.22605/RRH8365","DOIUrl":"10.22605/RRH8365","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Therapeutic reasoning focuses on the decisions related to patient disposition and management. This is in contrast to diagnostic reasoning, which is the focus of much of the current discourse in the medical literature. Few studies relate to therapeutic reasoning, and even fewer relate to the rural and remote context. This project sought to explore the therapeutic reasoning used by rural generalists working in a small rural hospital setting in Australia, caring for patients for whom it was unclear if escalation of care, including admission or interhospital transfer, was needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted using an interpretivist approach. A simulation scenario was developed with rural generalists and experts in medical simulation to use as a test bed to explore the reasoning of the rural generalist participants. The simulation context was a small rural Australian hospital with resources and treatment options typical of those found in a similar real-life setting. A simulated patient and a registered nurse were embedded in the scenario. Participants needed to make decisions throughout the scenario regarding the simulated patient and two anticipated patients who were said to be coming to the department. The scenario was immediately followed by a semi-structured interview exploring participants' therapeutic reasoning when planning care for these three patients. An inductive content analysis approach was used to analyse the data, and a mental model was developed. The researchers then tested this mental model against the recordings of the participants' simulation scenarios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight rural generalists, with varying levels of experience, participated in this study. Through the semi-structured interviews, participants described five themes: assessing clinician capacity to manage patient needs; availability of local physical resources and team members; considering options for help when local management was not enough; patients' wishes and shared decision making; and anticipating future requirements. The mental model developed from these themes consisted of seven questions: 'What can I do for this patient locally and what are my limits?'; 'Who is in my team and who can I rely on?'; 'What are the advantages and disadvantages of local management vs transfer?'; 'Who else needs to be involved and what are their limits?;' 'How can we align the patient's wants with their needs?'; 'How do we adapt to the current and future situation?'; and 'How do I preserve the capacity of the health service to provide care?'</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study explored the therapeutic reasoning of rural generalists using a simulated multi-patient emergency scenario. The mental model developed serves as a starting point when discussing therapeutic reasoning and is likely to be useful when providing education to medical students and junior doctors who are working in rural and remote","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":"23 4","pages":"8365"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138478505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-01Epub Date: 2023-12-13DOI: 10.22605/RRH7833
Debanhi B Martínez-Téllez, Evelyn E Martínez-Calderón, Patricia C Esquivel-Ferriño, Lucia G Cantú-Cardenas, Omar González-Santiago
Introduction: Mortality is affected by several factors, including the place of residence. Several studies have found a gap in mortality between urban and rural residents. This study aimed to describe adjusted mortality rates in urban and rural areas of Mexico.
Methods: Adjusted mortality rate per 100 000 inhabitants was estimated in urban and rural areas of Mexico, were grouped by sex, age, and main cause of death. Trend analysis was performed with a logarithmic regression of adjusted rates.
Results: Mortality was higher in urban (622.1/100 000 inhabitants) than rural (549.5/100 000 inhabitants) areas of Mexico. Males showed the highest mortality rate in both studied areas, urban and rural (737.8 and 634.4/100 000 inhabitants respectively). A significant annual decrease of 0.5% in mortality rates was observed in both areas.
Conclusion: In Mexico, there is a gap in mortality rates based on individuals' place of residence. Those who live in urban areas present the highest mortality rates.
{"title":"Mortality in residents of the urban and rural areas of Mexico, 2002-2019.","authors":"Debanhi B Martínez-Téllez, Evelyn E Martínez-Calderón, Patricia C Esquivel-Ferriño, Lucia G Cantú-Cardenas, Omar González-Santiago","doi":"10.22605/RRH7833","DOIUrl":"10.22605/RRH7833","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mortality is affected by several factors, including the place of residence. Several studies have found a gap in mortality between urban and rural residents. This study aimed to describe adjusted mortality rates in urban and rural areas of Mexico.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adjusted mortality rate per 100 000 inhabitants was estimated in urban and rural areas of Mexico, were grouped by sex, age, and main cause of death. Trend analysis was performed with a logarithmic regression of adjusted rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mortality was higher in urban (622.1/100 000 inhabitants) than rural (549.5/100 000 inhabitants) areas of Mexico. Males showed the highest mortality rate in both studied areas, urban and rural (737.8 and 634.4/100 000 inhabitants respectively). A significant annual decrease of 0.5% in mortality rates was observed in both areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Mexico, there is a gap in mortality rates based on individuals' place of residence. Those who live in urban areas present the highest mortality rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":"23 4","pages":"7833"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138809205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-01Epub Date: 2023-11-07DOI: 10.22605/RRH8724
Jon Griffin
empty.
空的
{"title":"Digital pathology: a crucial piece of the rural and remote cancer care puzzle.","authors":"Jon Griffin","doi":"10.22605/RRH8724","DOIUrl":"10.22605/RRH8724","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>empty.</p>","PeriodicalId":21460,"journal":{"name":"Rural and remote health","volume":"23 4","pages":"8724"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71485639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：