Pub Date : 2022-02-01DOI: 10.1177/00369330221080789
Ghulam Nabi
{"title":"Devices and Procedures Regulation in Medical Practice: Is There a Need for More transparency?","authors":"Ghulam Nabi","doi":"10.1177/00369330221080789","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00369330221080789","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45570998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-02-01DOI: 10.1177/00369330211068775
{"title":"Abstracts for Research & Audit Presentation - 12th November 2021.","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/00369330211068775","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00369330211068775","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43654362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background and aims: Polycystic ovarian syndrome is a reproductive problem of women with high prevalence cases accompanied by obesity conditions. Obesity condition can be seen from the size of waist circumference, hip circumference, arm span, and waist-to-hip ratio. This study aims to find out the risk factors between waist circumference size, hip circumference, arm span, and waist-to-hip ratio with polycystic ovarian syndrome.
Methods: This research is an analytical observation using a case-control approach conducted at Sekar Fertility Clinic and Poly Obgyn Dr Moewardi General Hospital Surakarta. Subjects were 150 consisting of 75 polycystic ovarian syndrome women and 75 normal fertile women. Sampling techniques used in this study are purposive sampling, researchers doing anthropometric measurements in the form of waist circumference, hip circumference, arm span, and waist-to-hip ratio simultaneously. The results were analyzed using Statistic Product and Service Solution 25.
Results: The results of the study obtained waist circumference with polycystic ovarian syndrome (b = 3.002; CI 95% = 3.41-123.5; p = 0.001), hip circumference (b = -2.671; CI 95% = 0.01-0.37; p = 0.002), arm span (b = 5.318; CI 95% = 32.23-129.58; p < 0.001) and waist-to-hip ratio (b = 1.761; CI 95% = 1.02-33.01; p = 0.047).
Conclusion: Waist circumference size, hip circumference, arm span, and waist-to-hip ratio correlate to a high risk of polycystic ovarian syndrome. Arm span is more dominant as an indicator of high risk to polycystic ovarian syndrome compared to waist circumference, hip circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio.
背景与目的:多囊卵巢综合征是一种高发的女性生殖疾病,并伴有肥胖。从腰围、臀围、臂展、腰臀比的大小可以看出肥胖的情况。本研究旨在探讨多囊卵巢综合征患者腰围大小、臀围、臂跨、腰臀比之间的危险因素。方法:本研究采用病例对照法在泗水市Sekar生育诊所和Poly Obgyn Dr Moewardi总医院进行分析观察。研究对象为150人,包括75名多囊卵巢综合征妇女和75名正常生育妇女。本研究采用的抽样技术是有目的抽样,研究人员同时进行腰围、臀围、臂幅和腰臀比的人体测量。使用Statistic Product and Service Solution 25对结果进行分析。结果:研究结果获得多囊卵巢综合征患者腰围(b = 3.002;Ci 95% = 3.41-123.5;P = 0.001)、臀围(b = -2.671;Ci 95% = 0.01-0.37;P = 0.002),臂展(b = 5.318;Ci 95% = 32.23-129.58;p b = 1.761;Ci 95% = 1.02-33.01;p = 0.047)。结论:腰围大小、臀围、臂跨、腰臀比与多囊卵巢综合征的高危相关。与腰围、臀围和腰臀比相比,臂距是多囊卵巢综合征高风险的主要指标。
{"title":"Waist circumference, hip circumference, arm span, and waist-to-hip ratio high risk of polycystic ovarian syndrome.","authors":"Tazkia Mawaddatina, Uki Retno Budihastuti, Dwi Rahayu","doi":"10.1177/00369330211043206","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330211043206","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Polycystic ovarian syndrome is a reproductive problem of women with high prevalence cases accompanied by obesity conditions. Obesity condition can be seen from the size of waist circumference, hip circumference, arm span, and waist-to-hip ratio. This study aims to find out the risk factors between waist circumference size, hip circumference, arm span, and waist-to-hip ratio with polycystic ovarian syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research is an analytical observation using a case-control approach conducted at Sekar Fertility Clinic and Poly Obgyn Dr Moewardi General Hospital Surakarta. Subjects were 150 consisting of 75 polycystic ovarian syndrome women and 75 normal fertile women. Sampling techniques used in this study are purposive sampling, researchers doing anthropometric measurements in the form of waist circumference, hip circumference, arm span, and waist-to-hip ratio simultaneously. The results were analyzed using Statistic Product and Service Solution 25.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the study obtained waist circumference with polycystic ovarian syndrome (<i>b</i> = 3.002; CI 95% = 3.41-123.5; <i>p</i> = 0.001), hip circumference (<i>b</i> = -2.671; CI 95% = 0.01-0.37; <i>p</i> = 0.002), arm span (<i>b</i> = 5.318; CI 95% = 32.23-129.58; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and waist-to-hip ratio (<i>b</i> = 1.761; CI 95% = 1.02-33.01; <i>p</i> = 0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Waist circumference size, hip circumference, arm span, and waist-to-hip ratio correlate to a high risk of polycystic ovarian syndrome. Arm span is more dominant as an indicator of high risk to polycystic ovarian syndrome compared to waist circumference, hip circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio.</p>","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39553220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-01DOI: 10.1177/00369330211052627
Jenni Lane, Rahul Bhome, Bhaskar Somani
Background and aims: Medical litigation claim and costs in UK are rising. This study aims to analyse the 10-year trend in litigation costs for individual clinical specialties in the UK from 2009/10 to 2018/19.
Methods: Data were procured from National Health Service (NHS) Resolution. Number of claims, total litigation costs and cost per claim were ascertained for each financial year. The data collected also includes the number of claims and average amount per claim per speciality during the years 2009-2019 (2009/2010 to 2018/2019 financial years).
Results: The total annual cost of NHS litigation is currently £3.6 billion(2018/2019). Damages make up the greatest proportion of costs(£1.5 billion). Surgical specialties have the greatest number of claims annually(2847) but Obstetrics has the greatest total litigation(£1.9 billion) and cost per claim(£2.6 million). Number of claims, total costs and cost per claim are significantly greater in 2018/2019 than in 2009/2010.
Conclusions: Addressing the issue of litigations is complex. Medically there are speciality specific issues that require attention, whilst some general measures are common to all: effective communication, setting realistic targets and maintaining a motivated, adequately staffed workforce. These, alongside legal reforms, may reduce the financial burden of increasing litigation on the NHS.
{"title":"National trends and cost of litigation in UK National Health Service (NHS): a specialty-specific analysis from the past decade.","authors":"Jenni Lane, Rahul Bhome, Bhaskar Somani","doi":"10.1177/00369330211052627","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330211052627","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Medical litigation claim and costs in UK are rising. This study aims to analyse the 10-year trend in litigation costs for individual clinical specialties in the UK from 2009/10 to 2018/19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were procured from National Health Service (NHS) Resolution. Number of claims, total litigation costs and cost per claim were ascertained for each financial year. The data collected also includes the number of claims and average amount per claim per speciality during the years 2009-2019 (2009/2010 to 2018/2019 financial years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total annual cost of NHS litigation is currently £3.6 billion(2018/2019). Damages make up the greatest proportion of costs(£1.5 billion). Surgical specialties have the greatest number of claims annually(2847) but Obstetrics has the greatest total litigation(£1.9 billion) and cost per claim(£2.6 million). Number of claims, total costs and cost per claim are significantly greater in 2018/2019 than in 2009/2010.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Addressing the issue of litigations is complex. Medically there are speciality specific issues that require attention, whilst some general measures are common to all: effective communication, setting realistic targets and maintaining a motivated, adequately staffed workforce. These, alongside legal reforms, may reduce the financial burden of increasing litigation on the NHS.</p>","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39849685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-01Epub Date: 2021-07-28DOI: 10.1177/00369330211034809
Guohua Sheng, Juan Zhou, Chi Zhang, Caijuan Wu, Kairong Huang, Xiaotong Qin, Jie Wu
Background and aims: Coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) is an important complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the relationship between lipoprotein associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) level and ISR after PCI is rarely reported. This study aims to explore the relationship between Lp-PLA2 and the occurrence of ISR at post-PCI and its predictive value for ISR.
Methods and results: Plasma Lp-PLA2 mass were measured in 847 patients planting 1262 stents and evaluated along with known risk indicators. One-year angiographic follow-up showed that baseline elevated Lp-PLA2 mass was strongly associated with early restenosis (95% CI = 1.062-3.050, P < 0.05). Beyond the first year, the occurrence of late restenosis (95% CI = 1.043-3.214, P < 0.05) was significantly larger in the elevated Lp-PLA2 group. Kaplan-Meier analysis after three-year clinical follow up suggested that Lp-PLA2 mass did add the positive effect on the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs).
Conclusion: In conclusion, increased baseline plasma Lp-PLA2 predicts increased risks of re-stenosis and MACEs, which may be a novel biomarker for predicting ISR and MACEs.
背景与目的:冠状动脉支架内再狭窄(ISR)是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的重要并发症。然而,PCI术后脂蛋白相关磷脂酶A2 (Lp-PLA2)水平与ISR之间的关系鲜有报道。本研究旨在探讨Lp-PLA2与pci后ISR发生的关系及其对ISR的预测价值。方法与结果:对847例植入1262支支架的患者进行血浆Lp-PLA2质量测定,并结合已知危险指标进行评价。1年的血管造影随访显示,基线血浆Lp-PLA2质量升高与早期再狭窄密切相关(95% CI = 1.062-3.050, P)。结论:基线血浆Lp-PLA2升高可预测再狭窄和mace的风险增加,这可能是预测ISR和mace的一种新的生物标志物。
{"title":"Relationship between Lp-PLA2 and in-stent restenosis after coronary stenting: a 3-year follow-up study.","authors":"Guohua Sheng, Juan Zhou, Chi Zhang, Caijuan Wu, Kairong Huang, Xiaotong Qin, Jie Wu","doi":"10.1177/00369330211034809","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330211034809","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) is an important complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the relationship between lipoprotein associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) level and ISR after PCI is rarely reported. This study aims to explore the relationship between Lp-PLA2 and the occurrence of ISR at post-PCI and its predictive value for ISR.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Plasma Lp-PLA2 mass were measured in 847 patients planting 1262 stents and evaluated along with known risk indicators. One-year angiographic follow-up showed that baseline elevated Lp-PLA2 mass was strongly associated with early restenosis (95% CI = 1.062-3.050, P < 0.05). Beyond the first year, the occurrence of late restenosis (95% CI = 1.043-3.214, P < 0.05) was significantly larger in the elevated Lp-PLA2 group. Kaplan-Meier analysis after three-year clinical follow up suggested that Lp-PLA2 mass did add the positive effect on the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, increased baseline plasma Lp-PLA2 predicts increased risks of re-stenosis and MACEs, which may be a novel biomarker for predicting ISR and MACEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/00369330211034809","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39226540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-01Epub Date: 2021-07-26DOI: 10.1177/00369330211032352
Timothy Davies, William Royce, Robin Crosbie, Richard Townsley
Background and aims: Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma is defined as papillary thyroid cancer with a diameter of ≤1 cm. Despite its prevalence, there is wide variation in practice in the investigation and management of patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma throughout the UK and internationally. The primary aim of this paper is to describe the experience of investigation and management in a Scottish health board over the past 10 years.
Methods and results: Retrospective analysis of thyroidectomy and hemithyroidectomy resection samples from March 2009 to March 2020. 532 specimens were reviewed and 20 patients with PTMC were identified. 12 patients had an incidental finding of PTMC. Median U score- 3, Median Thy score- 2.5 for dominant or radiologically suspicious nodules. 8 specimens demonstrated aggressive histopathological features. 1 patient with positive nodal disease in the neck and 0 patients with positive nodal disease in the thorax on CT Neck and Chest.
Conclusion: Here we report the first UK Cohort describing the radiological investigation and management of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. The results of our study are in accordance with a recent meta-analysis which found 4% nodal disease and 0.025% distant metastasis at time of presentation in patients with PTMC.
{"title":"Investigation and management of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma - a Scottish regional case series and literature review.","authors":"Timothy Davies, William Royce, Robin Crosbie, Richard Townsley","doi":"10.1177/00369330211032352","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330211032352","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma is defined as papillary thyroid cancer with a diameter of ≤1 cm. Despite its prevalence, there is wide variation in practice in the investigation and management of patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma throughout the UK and internationally. The primary aim of this paper is to describe the experience of investigation and management in a Scottish health board over the past 10 years.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Retrospective analysis of thyroidectomy and hemithyroidectomy resection samples from March 2009 to March 2020. 532 specimens were reviewed and 20 patients with PTMC were identified. 12 patients had an incidental finding of PTMC. Median U score- 3, Median Thy score- 2.5 for dominant or radiologically suspicious nodules. 8 specimens demonstrated aggressive histopathological features. 1 patient with positive nodal disease in the neck and 0 patients with positive nodal disease in the thorax on CT Neck and Chest.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Here we report the first UK Cohort describing the radiological investigation and management of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. The results of our study are in accordance with a recent meta-analysis which found 4% nodal disease and 0.025% distant metastasis at time of presentation in patients with PTMC.</p>","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/00369330211032352","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39218736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-01DOI: 10.1177/00369330211055810
Robyn Webber
The possibility of a medical negligence claim lies at the back of many doctors' minds. But which specialties see the greatest and fewest claims, and what are the potential costs to the NHS of a successful claim? In their article, Dr Lane et al. analyse 10 years' NHS litigation data, broken down by specialty, number of claims, and the attendant cost of those claims which were successful. Litigation in the 'post Montgomery' era is considered along with some of the common factors which may lead to a patient or their family taking legal action.
{"title":"Editorial - Medical litigation in the 21st century.","authors":"Robyn Webber","doi":"10.1177/00369330211055810","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330211055810","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The possibility of a medical negligence claim lies at the back of many doctors' minds. But which specialties see the greatest and fewest claims, and what are the potential costs to the NHS of a successful claim? In their article, Dr Lane et al. analyse 10 years' NHS litigation data, broken down by specialty, number of claims, and the attendant cost of those claims which were successful. Litigation in the 'post Montgomery' era is considered along with some of the common factors which may lead to a patient or their family taking legal action.</p>","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39849686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-01DOI: 10.1177/00369330211058808
Ghuam Nabi
A career in Medicine is often rewarding and profession is regarded as one of the noble professions. In a professional relationship between patient and doctor, due care is rendered based on principles of sincerity, trust and mutual understanding that outcome may not be predictable in certain circumstances and things can and will go wrong. however, axiom such as “you learn from your mistakes” is not considered as learning opportunity anymore and law is brought in by the patients to decide level of negligence by the doctors, in cases where perceived errors are witnessed. The judges with no knowledge of medical science decide degree of negligence and compensation based on medical expert opinions. In Cambridge dictionary, negligence is defined as “the fact of not giving enough care or attention to someone or something”. The parameters to categorise degree of negligence are often subjective and varied between; lata culpa, gross neglect; levis culpa’ ordinary neglect and levissima culpa, slight neglect (1). The decision on the level of negligence is further dependant on the context, circumstances of individuals and systems. In a medical error, it is often assumed that things have gone wrong and somebody needs to be punished and medical practitioners are often held responsible without observing any cautions that matters are invariably complex. The decisions to pursue cases of medicolegal negligence are often based on notions that what the best practice should have been rather than exhibiting deeper understanding of real-life practices. No distinction is made between a case of occupational negligence and professional negligence. A case of negligence should not be made on the basis that better alternatives or more skilled approach was likely to adopted in a case than the one under consideration. Rather Bolam test should be applied to the matters of negligence (2). The Bolam test is “The test is the standard of the ordinary skilled man exercising and professing to have that special skill” A practitioner is not negligent as long as he has acted in accordance with practice approved by a body of other responsible doctors. There is a less recognised side effect of negligence cases pursued by litigants against doctors. The impact of “fear of failure” by medical practitioners on society need to be realised and this may be counterproductive with potential for more harm than good. A dangling fear in the mind of surgeon of failure and subsequent prosecution would prevent him from acting in the best interest of patient. Similarly, a seriously sick patient with 10% chances of survival may not get resuscitated as failure to achieve a satisfactory outcome may land a medical practitioner into a court case and the fear may prevent him from acting in the best interest of patient. In contrast to spending resources on pursuing matters of perceived negligence by society, we should be spending on prevention. Use of apology, clinical guidelines and proper documentation are some
{"title":"Medicolegal issues in healthcare: Corporatisation of healthcare.","authors":"Ghuam Nabi","doi":"10.1177/00369330211058808","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330211058808","url":null,"abstract":"A career in Medicine is often rewarding and profession is regarded as one of the noble professions. In a professional relationship between patient and doctor, due care is rendered based on principles of sincerity, trust and mutual understanding that outcome may not be predictable in certain circumstances and things can and will go wrong. however, axiom such as “you learn from your mistakes” is not considered as learning opportunity anymore and law is brought in by the patients to decide level of negligence by the doctors, in cases where perceived errors are witnessed. The judges with no knowledge of medical science decide degree of negligence and compensation based on medical expert opinions. In Cambridge dictionary, negligence is defined as “the fact of not giving enough care or attention to someone or something”. The parameters to categorise degree of negligence are often subjective and varied between; lata culpa, gross neglect; levis culpa’ ordinary neglect and levissima culpa, slight neglect (1). The decision on the level of negligence is further dependant on the context, circumstances of individuals and systems. In a medical error, it is often assumed that things have gone wrong and somebody needs to be punished and medical practitioners are often held responsible without observing any cautions that matters are invariably complex. The decisions to pursue cases of medicolegal negligence are often based on notions that what the best practice should have been rather than exhibiting deeper understanding of real-life practices. No distinction is made between a case of occupational negligence and professional negligence. A case of negligence should not be made on the basis that better alternatives or more skilled approach was likely to adopted in a case than the one under consideration. Rather Bolam test should be applied to the matters of negligence (2). The Bolam test is “The test is the standard of the ordinary skilled man exercising and professing to have that special skill” A practitioner is not negligent as long as he has acted in accordance with practice approved by a body of other responsible doctors. There is a less recognised side effect of negligence cases pursued by litigants against doctors. The impact of “fear of failure” by medical practitioners on society need to be realised and this may be counterproductive with potential for more harm than good. A dangling fear in the mind of surgeon of failure and subsequent prosecution would prevent him from acting in the best interest of patient. Similarly, a seriously sick patient with 10% chances of survival may not get resuscitated as failure to achieve a satisfactory outcome may land a medical practitioner into a court case and the fear may prevent him from acting in the best interest of patient. In contrast to spending resources on pursuing matters of perceived negligence by society, we should be spending on prevention. Use of apology, clinical guidelines and proper documentation are some","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39849692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-11-01DOI: 10.1177/0036933020973637
Xinrui Zhang, Andreas Melzer
Ablation refers to the local application of optical, acoustic or electrical energy and cold as to induce irreversible cell injury, apoptosis and coagulative necrosis of tissues. By contrast to surgical excision, ablation is a minimally invasive treatment option, whereby the scarified tissue remains in situ and is being absorbed over several months and transformed to a scar. Clinical use of ablation encompasses the treatment of various tumors, including liver, lung, kidney, pancreatic, head and neck cancer and bone metastasis. Additionally, neurological disorders, particularly essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease, can be treated by ablation of brain tissue or neuronal structures. Relatively novel is the use electrical energy in a certain pattern that induces cell apoptosis without coagulation, referred to irreversible electroporation (IRE), see Rui Chen et al. in this issue of SMJ. In order to decide which kind of local cell destruction is useful and can be applied safely a thorough understanding of the underlying principles is essential. In addition, it is required to use an appropriate imaging technology to monitor and control the process of tissue destruction. The process of energy-induced cell/tissue destruction consists of two phases through direct and indirect mechanisms. The direct damage of cells occurs rapidly after exposure of the target tissue to high temperature, alteration of the cell membrane, dysfunction of mitochondrial and inhibition of DNA replication. Changes of cell membrane fluidity and permeability are considered as the major cause of cell injury, leading to dysfunction of actin filaments and microtubules and impairment of facilitated diffusion across the cell membrane. Mitochondria are affected by high temperature, increasing leakage of protons through the inner mitochondrial membrane and changing the ultrastructure in minutes. Besides the changes in cellular level, heatinduced denaturation of key replication enzymes DNA polymerase a and b, which is responsible for semiconservative DNA replication and DNA repair synthesis respectively, thereby inhibiting DNA replication. Denaturation of polymerase substrate chromatin, abnormal condensation of non-histone nuclear matrix proteins, disruption of RNA synthesis and the release of lysosomal enzymes are believed the mechanisms of heat-mediated reproductive cell death. The indirect mechanism occurs via several mechanisms, including induction of apoptosis, the release of cytokines and stimulation of immune response. Apoptosis is increased in the peripheral zone of the central ablated lesion, which undergoes coagulative necrosis. Expression of essential apoptotic protein p53 was upregulated and bcl-2 was downregulated in human liver cancer tissues after ablation treatment. Release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1b (IL-1b), IL-6, IL-8, IL-18 and tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a) increase in several hours to days after ablation maximize the anti-tumor response. Heat
{"title":"Image guided ablation.","authors":"Xinrui Zhang, Andreas Melzer","doi":"10.1177/0036933020973637","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0036933020973637","url":null,"abstract":"Ablation refers to the local application of optical, acoustic or electrical energy and cold as to induce irreversible cell injury, apoptosis and coagulative necrosis of tissues. By contrast to surgical excision, ablation is a minimally invasive treatment option, whereby the scarified tissue remains in situ and is being absorbed over several months and transformed to a scar. Clinical use of ablation encompasses the treatment of various tumors, including liver, lung, kidney, pancreatic, head and neck cancer and bone metastasis. Additionally, neurological disorders, particularly essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease, can be treated by ablation of brain tissue or neuronal structures. Relatively novel is the use electrical energy in a certain pattern that induces cell apoptosis without coagulation, referred to irreversible electroporation (IRE), see Rui Chen et al. in this issue of SMJ. In order to decide which kind of local cell destruction is useful and can be applied safely a thorough understanding of the underlying principles is essential. In addition, it is required to use an appropriate imaging technology to monitor and control the process of tissue destruction. The process of energy-induced cell/tissue destruction consists of two phases through direct and indirect mechanisms. The direct damage of cells occurs rapidly after exposure of the target tissue to high temperature, alteration of the cell membrane, dysfunction of mitochondrial and inhibition of DNA replication. Changes of cell membrane fluidity and permeability are considered as the major cause of cell injury, leading to dysfunction of actin filaments and microtubules and impairment of facilitated diffusion across the cell membrane. Mitochondria are affected by high temperature, increasing leakage of protons through the inner mitochondrial membrane and changing the ultrastructure in minutes. Besides the changes in cellular level, heatinduced denaturation of key replication enzymes DNA polymerase a and b, which is responsible for semiconservative DNA replication and DNA repair synthesis respectively, thereby inhibiting DNA replication. Denaturation of polymerase substrate chromatin, abnormal condensation of non-histone nuclear matrix proteins, disruption of RNA synthesis and the release of lysosomal enzymes are believed the mechanisms of heat-mediated reproductive cell death. The indirect mechanism occurs via several mechanisms, including induction of apoptosis, the release of cytokines and stimulation of immune response. Apoptosis is increased in the peripheral zone of the central ablated lesion, which undergoes coagulative necrosis. Expression of essential apoptotic protein p53 was upregulated and bcl-2 was downregulated in human liver cancer tissues after ablation treatment. Release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1b (IL-1b), IL-6, IL-8, IL-18 and tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a) increase in several hours to days after ablation maximize the anti-tumor response. Heat","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/de/e3/10.1177_0036933020973637.PMC8573691.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39849690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: To devise a novel, simple chest x-ray (CXR) scoring system which would help in prognosticating the disease severity and ability to predict comorbidities and in-hospital mortality.
Methods: We included a total of 343 consecutive hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in this study. The chest x-rays of these patients were scored retrospectively by three radiologists independently. We divided CXR in to six zones (right upper, mid & lower and left, upper mid & lower zones). We scored each zone as- 0, 1 or 2 as follows- if that zone was clear (0) Ground glass opacity (1) or Consolidation (2). A total of score from 0 to 12 could be obtained.
Results: A CXR score cut off ≥3 independently predicted mortality. Along with a relatively higher NPV ≥80%, it reinforced the importance of CXR score is a screening tool to triage patients according to risk of mortality.
Conclusions: We propose that Pennine score is a simple tool which can be adapted by various countries, experiencing a large surge in number of patients, to decide which patient would need a tertiary Hospital referral/admission as opposed to patients that can be managed locally or at basic/primary care hospitals.
{"title":"Chest x-ray scoring as a predictor of COVID-19 disease; correlation with comorbidities and in-hospital mortality.","authors":"Aparajita Singh, Yoke Hong Lim, Rajesh Annamalaisamy, Shyam Sunder Koteyar, Suresh Chandran, Avinash Kumar Kanodia, Navin Khanna","doi":"10.1177/00369330211027447","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330211027447","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To devise a novel, simple chest x-ray (CXR) scoring system which would help in prognosticating the disease severity and ability to predict comorbidities and in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included a total of 343 consecutive hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in this study. The chest x-rays of these patients were scored retrospectively by three radiologists independently. We divided CXR in to six zones (right upper, mid & lower and left, upper mid & lower zones). We scored each zone as- 0, 1 or 2 as follows- if that zone was clear (0) Ground glass opacity (1) or Consolidation (2). A total of score from 0 to 12 could be obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A CXR score cut off ≥3 independently predicted mortality. Along with a relatively higher NPV ≥80%, it reinforced the importance of CXR score is a screening tool to triage patients according to risk of mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We propose that Pennine score is a simple tool which can be adapted by various countries, experiencing a large surge in number of patients, to decide which patient would need a tertiary Hospital referral/admission as opposed to patients that can be managed locally or at basic/primary care hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/00369330211027447","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39112404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}