Background and aims: The complete pathological response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer is essential for the accurate prediction of prognosis. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the presence and type of peritumoral edema detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting pCR to NAC in breast cancer patients.
Methods and results: One hundred five patients with the diagnosis of invasive carcinoma were evaluated by MRI before NAC. Edema was evaluated in fat-suppressed T2-weighted images. The patients were categorized into three groups: patients with no peritumoral edema, patients with peritumoral edema, and patients demonstrating subcutaneous edema. The cases were categorized as being pCR and non-pCR. Molecular subtypes, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), tumor size, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were evaluated. A positive relationship was found between the presence of edema and tumor size. Subcutaneous edema was found to be statistically higher in non-pCR patients. While the number of pCR patients with subcutaneous edema was 17 (30.4%), the number of non-pCR patients with subcutaneous edema was 26 (53.1%) (p = 0.018). LVI was found to be statistically higher in patients with edema. The number of edema-negative and LVI (+) patients was 4 (15.4%), while the number of edema-positive and LVI (+) patients was 28 (35.4%) (p = 0.042). Intratumoral and peritumoral ADC values were significantly higher in tumors with edema.
Conclusion: The presence of subcutaneous edema and LVI may be utilized for the prediction of pCR outcomes in breast cancer patients scheduled for NAC treatment.
{"title":"Can peritumoral edema evaluated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging before neoadjuvant chemotherapy predict complete pathological response in breast cancer?","authors":"Burcak Cakir Pekoz, Okan Dilek, Tolga Koseci, Zeynel Abidin Tas, Oktay Irkorucu, Bozkurt Gulek","doi":"10.1177/00369330231174230","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330231174230","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The complete pathological response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer is essential for the accurate prediction of prognosis. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the presence and type of peritumoral edema detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting pCR to NAC in breast cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>One hundred five patients with the diagnosis of invasive carcinoma were evaluated by MRI before NAC. Edema was evaluated in fat-suppressed T2-weighted images. The patients were categorized into three groups: patients with no peritumoral edema, patients with peritumoral edema, and patients demonstrating subcutaneous edema. The cases were categorized as being pCR and non-pCR. Molecular subtypes, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), tumor size, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were evaluated. A positive relationship was found between the presence of edema and tumor size. Subcutaneous edema was found to be statistically higher in non-pCR patients. While the number of pCR patients with subcutaneous edema was 17 (30.4%), the number of non-pCR patients with subcutaneous edema was 26 (53.1%) (<i>p</i> = 0.018). LVI was found to be statistically higher in patients with edema. The number of edema-negative and LVI (+) patients was 4 (15.4%), while the number of edema-positive and LVI (+) patients was 28 (35.4%) (<i>p</i> = 0.042). Intratumoral and peritumoral ADC values were significantly higher in tumors with edema.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of subcutaneous edema and LVI may be utilized for the prediction of pCR outcomes in breast cancer patients scheduled for NAC treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":"68 3","pages":"121-128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10178456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01Epub Date: 2023-05-30DOI: 10.1177/00369330231178909
Ping Liu, Fang Cao, Qian Yao, Lin Xu, Hao Dai
Background and aims: Developing and implementing an educational and training programmes for improving hand hygiene compliance of the nursing personnel might help in increasing their knowledge, promoting positive attitude and follow adequate practice measures.
Material and methods: Systematic search was done in PubMed, SCOPUS, CENTRAL, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, Clinicaltrials.gov and Google Scholar databases for articles published between 1964 and December 2022. Meta-analysis was carried out using a random-effects model, and the results were reported as pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), pooled standardised mean differences (SMD) or risk ratios (RR).
Results: Eight studies were included in the analysis. Most studies had higher risk of bias. Nurses receiving educational and training programmes had significantly higher compliance to hand hygiene practices (pooled RR of 1.69 [95% CI: 1.23-2.31; I2 = 99.1%], p = 0.001). The pooled analysis based on studies reporting the compliance to hand hygiene as continuous outcome has reported the pooled SMD as 1.28 with 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.95 and I2 = 74.5%. There were no single-study effects with respect to this outcome, since the sensitivity analysis showed no difference in either direction or strength of effect estimate.
Conclusion: Educational and training programmes are effective in improving the hand hygiene compliance amongst the nursing professionals.
{"title":"Effectiveness of educational and training intervention for improving hand hygiene compliance amongst nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.","authors":"Ping Liu, Fang Cao, Qian Yao, Lin Xu, Hao Dai","doi":"10.1177/00369330231178909","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00369330231178909","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Developing and implementing an educational and training programmes for improving hand hygiene compliance of the nursing personnel might help in increasing their knowledge, promoting positive attitude and follow adequate practice measures.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Systematic search was done in PubMed, SCOPUS, CENTRAL, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, Clinicaltrials.gov and Google Scholar databases for articles published between 1964 and December 2022. Meta-analysis was carried out using a random-effects model, and the results were reported as pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), pooled standardised mean differences (SMD) or risk ratios (RR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies were included in the analysis. Most studies had higher risk of bias. Nurses receiving educational and training programmes had significantly higher compliance to hand hygiene practices (pooled RR of 1.69 [95% CI: 1.23-2.31; I<sup>2</sup> = 99.1%], p = 0.001). The pooled analysis based on studies reporting the compliance to hand hygiene as continuous outcome has reported the pooled SMD as 1.28 with 95% CI: 0.62 to 1.95 and I<sup>2</sup> = 74.5%. There were no single-study effects with respect to this outcome, since the sensitivity analysis showed no difference in either direction or strength of effect estimate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Educational and training programmes are effective in improving the hand hygiene compliance amongst the nursing professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":"68 3","pages":"72-79"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10176068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01Epub Date: 2023-07-25DOI: 10.1177/00369330231188962
Lanqin Gao, Yazhen Zhan, Xingping Hu, Shuli Liao
Objective: This review aimed to examine if the platelet-lymphocyte ratio and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio can be useful in determining disease activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
Methods: PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for studies published up to 9 January 2023. Platelet-lymphocyte ratio and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio values from active and remission inflammatory bowel disease cases were compared to generate a mean difference (MD).
Results: Nine studies were included. Meta-analysis showed that inflammatory bowel disease patients with active disease had significantly higher values of platelet-lymphocyte ratio as compared to those in remission (MD: 63.46 95% CI: 35.74, 91.17, I2 = 89%). The values of platelet-lymphocyte ratio were significantly higher in both active ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease patients. Meta-analysis also showed that lymphocyte-monocyte ratio values were significantly lower in active inflammatory bowel disease patients as compared to those under remission (MD: -1.28 95% CI: -1.42, -1.14, I2 = 4%). Lymphocyte-monocyte ratio values were significantly lower in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease patients with active disease.
Conclusion: Platelet-lymphocyte ratio and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio can be useful blood-based markers in differentiating active disease in inflammatory bowel disease patients. Active cases of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease have high platelet-lymphocyte ratio and low lymphocyte-monocyte ratio as compared to those in remission. Further studies with a larger sample size are needed to strengthen conclusions.
{"title":"Platelet-lymphocyte ratio and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio in inflammatory bowel disease and disease activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Lanqin Gao, Yazhen Zhan, Xingping Hu, Shuli Liao","doi":"10.1177/00369330231188962","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00369330231188962","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aimed to examine if the platelet-lymphocyte ratio and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio can be useful in determining disease activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for studies published up to 9 January 2023. Platelet-lymphocyte ratio and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio values from active and remission inflammatory bowel disease cases were compared to generate a mean difference (MD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies were included. Meta-analysis showed that inflammatory bowel disease patients with active disease had significantly higher values of platelet-lymphocyte ratio as compared to those in remission (MD: 63.46 95% CI: 35.74, 91.17, <i>I</i><sup>2 </sup>= 89%). The values of platelet-lymphocyte ratio were significantly higher in both active ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease patients. Meta-analysis also showed that lymphocyte-monocyte ratio values were significantly lower in active inflammatory bowel disease patients as compared to those under remission (MD: -1.28 95% CI: -1.42, -1.14, <i>I</i><sup>2 </sup>= 4%). Lymphocyte-monocyte ratio values were significantly lower in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease patients with active disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Platelet-lymphocyte ratio and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio can be useful blood-based markers in differentiating active disease in inflammatory bowel disease patients. Active cases of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease have high platelet-lymphocyte ratio and low lymphocyte-monocyte ratio as compared to those in remission. Further studies with a larger sample size are needed to strengthen conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":"68 3","pages":"101-109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10178494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01Epub Date: 2023-08-21DOI: 10.1177/00369330231193888
Qiushuo Wu, Ghulam Nabi
This issue of the Scottish Medical Journal has a few systematic reviews and critical analysis of literature in many areas. We feel that for clinical practice, evidence is essential and systematic reviews summarize evidence for us through a scientific synthesis. The range of topics of systematic reviews.1–8 in this issue has been wide and not focusing on a particular problem, however, publications should generate awareness, some glimpse into methodology and associated discussions around evidence-based medicine. Evidence-based medicine is a combination of individual clinical knowledge and the results of clinical trials. And as a doctor, there is a great need for some strong evidence to support his diagnosis and treatment and all aspects of it. Due to the proliferation of medical literature and the limited time available to clinicians and researchers, systematic evaluation was born. The systematic evaluation aims to obtain stronger clinical evidence for clinical decisionmaking by systematically searching medical databases. So high-quality systematic reviews are needed. The quality of a systematic review depends on the number and quality of the studies included and the presence of heterogeneity. Choosing a good topic is the beginning of preparing a systematic review. Once you have chosen a topic, you can start with the Protocol. At this stage, most journals recommend that we use The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) to assist in the writing of our articles. PROSPERO (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/) is a well-known platform for registration of system overviews, so it is best to make a registration on such a platform. And check if anyone has done any relevant research to avoid duplication. In particular, for clinical questions, authors should use the “Participants, Interventions, Comparisons and Outcomes (PICO)” to analyze the question before starting the process of conducting a systematic review. The search strategy is mainly to link some keywords by means of ‘and’ and ‘or’ to achieve a search of the relevant literature. Then it is a matter of selecting the appropriate database for the search, e.g. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, CENTRAL, Cinahl, and LiLacs., etc. Searches can be conducted within them using keywords and appropriate filters such as time frame, language, type of literature, etc. It is recommended to search using multiple databases to increase the coverage of the literature. Before literature screening, screening criteria should be determined, including inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. The selection of literature is divided into 2 parts, firstly by determining the type of literature and reading the abstract to determine whether the literature meets the search requirements to exclude some literature, and secondly by reading the full text of the article to determine whether the selected literature meets the requirements and whether there is a lack of data to determi
{"title":"Systematic reviews and data analyses: Guide to clinical practice and research.","authors":"Qiushuo Wu, Ghulam Nabi","doi":"10.1177/00369330231193888","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00369330231193888","url":null,"abstract":"This issue of the Scottish Medical Journal has a few systematic reviews and critical analysis of literature in many areas. We feel that for clinical practice, evidence is essential and systematic reviews summarize evidence for us through a scientific synthesis. The range of topics of systematic reviews.1–8 in this issue has been wide and not focusing on a particular problem, however, publications should generate awareness, some glimpse into methodology and associated discussions around evidence-based medicine. Evidence-based medicine is a combination of individual clinical knowledge and the results of clinical trials. And as a doctor, there is a great need for some strong evidence to support his diagnosis and treatment and all aspects of it. Due to the proliferation of medical literature and the limited time available to clinicians and researchers, systematic evaluation was born. The systematic evaluation aims to obtain stronger clinical evidence for clinical decisionmaking by systematically searching medical databases. So high-quality systematic reviews are needed. The quality of a systematic review depends on the number and quality of the studies included and the presence of heterogeneity. Choosing a good topic is the beginning of preparing a systematic review. Once you have chosen a topic, you can start with the Protocol. At this stage, most journals recommend that we use The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) to assist in the writing of our articles. PROSPERO (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/) is a well-known platform for registration of system overviews, so it is best to make a registration on such a platform. And check if anyone has done any relevant research to avoid duplication. In particular, for clinical questions, authors should use the “Participants, Interventions, Comparisons and Outcomes (PICO)” to analyze the question before starting the process of conducting a systematic review. The search strategy is mainly to link some keywords by means of ‘and’ and ‘or’ to achieve a search of the relevant literature. Then it is a matter of selecting the appropriate database for the search, e.g. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, CENTRAL, Cinahl, and LiLacs., etc. Searches can be conducted within them using keywords and appropriate filters such as time frame, language, type of literature, etc. It is recommended to search using multiple databases to increase the coverage of the literature. Before literature screening, screening criteria should be determined, including inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. The selection of literature is divided into 2 parts, firstly by determining the type of literature and reading the abstract to determine whether the literature meets the search requirements to exclude some literature, and secondly by reading the full text of the article to determine whether the selected literature meets the requirements and whether there is a lack of data to determi","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":"68 3","pages":"69-71"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10549119","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01DOI: 10.1177/00369330231187719
Objectives: Determine the association between socio-economic status and features of Paediatric Emergency
{"title":"Scottish Paediatric Society Summer Meeting, Stirling Court Hotel, University of Stirling, Friday 10th June 2022.","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/00369330231187719","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00369330231187719","url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Determine the association between socio-economic status and features of Paediatric Emergency","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":"68 3","pages":"NP11-NP16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10196937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01DOI: 10.1177/00369330231187718
Background: Clinical decision scores are used to target antibiotic use for acute sore throat (AST) but are not well validated in children under 5 years old. NICE guidance recommends antibiotics in AST where FeverPAIN score is >4. Following an increase in Group A streptococcal (GAS) transmission in December 2022, Public Health Scotland (PHS) interim guidance lowered this prescribing threshold to a FeverPAIN score >3. Objectives: To audit antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infection (URTI)/AST in the PED in the context of the GAS public health alert in December 2022 with NICE and interim PHS guidance as reference standards. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the FeverPAIN score in predicting con fi rmed GAS infection. Population: All children aged 3 to 16 years who presented to the PED between 3 and 16 December 2022, who had a throat swab for bacterial culture. Methods: Cases were identi fi ed from laboratory sample data. FeverPAIN scores retrospectively assigned from clinical records. Descriptive statistics were calculated in excel. Received operator characteristic (ROC)curves were created using XLSTAT. Only children with a diagnosis of URTI/AST and calculable FeverPAIN score were included.
{"title":"Scottish Paediatric Society Summer meeting Friday 9th June 2023 Suttie Centre for Teaching and Learning in Healthcare Foresthill Site, University of Aberdeen.","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/00369330231187718","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00369330231187718","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Clinical decision scores are used to target antibiotic use for acute sore throat (AST) but are not well validated in children under 5 years old. NICE guidance recommends antibiotics in AST where FeverPAIN score is >4. Following an increase in Group A streptococcal (GAS) transmission in December 2022, Public Health Scotland (PHS) interim guidance lowered this prescribing threshold to a FeverPAIN score >3. Objectives: To audit antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infection (URTI)/AST in the PED in the context of the GAS public health alert in December 2022 with NICE and interim PHS guidance as reference standards. To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the FeverPAIN score in predicting con fi rmed GAS infection. Population: All children aged 3 to 16 years who presented to the PED between 3 and 16 December 2022, who had a throat swab for bacterial culture. Methods: Cases were identi fi ed from laboratory sample data. FeverPAIN scores retrospectively assigned from clinical records. Descriptive statistics were calculated in excel. Received operator characteristic (ROC)curves were created using XLSTAT. Only children with a diagnosis of URTI/AST and calculable FeverPAIN score were included.","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":"68 3","pages":"NP6-NP10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10196941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01Epub Date: 2023-07-27DOI: 10.1177/00369330231189886
Fang Ji, Xiaohui Zhou
Objective: It is unclear if prehospital intubation improves survival in patients with traumatic brain injury. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of prehospital intubation on mortality rates of traumatic brain injury.
Methods: PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched without any language restriction up to 20 June 2022 for all types of comparative studies reporting survival of traumatic brain injury patients based on prehospital intubation.
Results: In total, 18 studies with 41,185 patients were eligible for inclusion. Meta-analysis showed that traumatic brain injury patients receiving prehospital intubation had higher odds of mortality as compared to those not receiving prehospital intubation. Meta-analysis of adjusted data also indicated that prehospital intubation was associated with increased odds of mortality in traumatic brain injury patients. The results did not change on sensitivity analysis. Subgroup analysis based on study type, the severity of traumatic brain injury, inclusion of isolated traumatic brain injury, emergency department intubation in the control group, and prehospital intubation group sample size demonstrated variable results.
Conclusion: Heterogeneous data from mostly observational studies demonstrates higher mortality rates among traumatic brain injury patients receiving prehospital intubation. The efficacy of prehospital intubation is difficult to judge without taking into account multiple confounding factors.
目的:目前尚不清楚院前插管是否能提高脑外伤患者的存活率。我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,以评估院前插管对创伤性脑损伤死亡率的影响:截至 2022 年 6 月 20 日,我们在 PubMed、CENTRAL、Web of Science 和 Embase 数据库中检索了报告基于院前插管的脑外伤患者存活率的各类比较研究,没有任何语言限制:共有18项研究、41185名患者符合纳入条件。元分析表明,与未接受院前插管的患者相比,接受院前插管的脑外伤患者死亡率更高。对调整后的数据进行的 Meta 分析也表明,院前插管与脑外伤患者的死亡几率增加有关。敏感性分析的结果没有变化。根据研究类型、创伤性脑损伤的严重程度、孤立性创伤性脑损伤的纳入情况、对照组中急诊科插管情况以及院前插管组样本量进行的分组分析显示了不同的结果:结论:来自大部分观察性研究的不同数据显示,接受院前插管治疗的脑外伤患者死亡率较高。如果不考虑多种混杂因素,很难判断院前插管的疗效。
{"title":"Effect of prehospital intubation on mortality rates in patients with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Fang Ji, Xiaohui Zhou","doi":"10.1177/00369330231189886","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00369330231189886","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>It is unclear if prehospital intubation improves survival in patients with traumatic brain injury. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of prehospital intubation on mortality rates of traumatic brain injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched without any language restriction up to 20 June 2022 for all types of comparative studies reporting survival of traumatic brain injury patients based on prehospital intubation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 18 studies with 41,185 patients were eligible for inclusion. Meta-analysis showed that traumatic brain injury patients receiving prehospital intubation had higher odds of mortality as compared to those not receiving prehospital intubation. Meta-analysis of adjusted data also indicated that prehospital intubation was associated with increased odds of mortality in traumatic brain injury patients. The results did not change on sensitivity analysis. Subgroup analysis based on study type, the severity of traumatic brain injury, inclusion of isolated traumatic brain injury, emergency department intubation in the control group, and prehospital intubation group sample size demonstrated variable results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Heterogeneous data from mostly observational studies demonstrates higher mortality rates among traumatic brain injury patients receiving prehospital intubation. The efficacy of prehospital intubation is difficult to judge without taking into account multiple confounding factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":"68 3","pages":"80-90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10168449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-08-01Epub Date: 2023-07-25DOI: 10.1177/00369330231189887
Haiyan Xiong, Linlin Shi
Background: There is an ongoing debate if weekend admissions of critically ill patients are associated with higher mortality rates. The current review aimed to specifically assess this effect in sepsis and septic shock patients by comparing mortality rates with weekend versus weekday admissions.
Methods: PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to 20th February 2023 with an additional search of Google Scholar for gray literature.
Results: Nine studies were eligible. Meta-analysis of all nine studies with data from 1,134,417 patients demonstrated that sepsis or septic shock patients admitted on weekends don't have higher mortality as compared to those admitted on weekdays (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.09; p = 0.05; I2 = 93%). On subgroup analysis based on sample size (>2000 or <2000 patients) and timing of mortality, we noted no difference in the significance of the results. However, there was a small significant increased risk of mortality with weekend admission noted in studies on the Asian population and including septic shock patients.
Conclusion: Weekend admission does not have an adverse impact on mortality rates of sepsis and septic shock patients. Results must be interpreted with caution owing to high interstudy heterogeneity and variation in confounders adjusted by individual studies.
背景:危重病人周末入院是否与较高的死亡率有关一直存在争议。本综述旨在通过比较周末与平日入院患者的死亡率,具体评估败血症和脓毒性休克患者的这一影响:方法:对截至 2023 年 2 月 20 日的 PubMed、CENTRAL、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Embase 进行了检索,并对 Google Scholar 的灰色文献进行了额外检索:结果:9 项研究符合条件。对所有九项研究的 1,134,417 名患者数据进行的 Meta 分析表明,与工作日相比,周末入院的脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者的死亡率并不更高(OR:1.04;95% CI:1.00, 1.09;P = 0.05;I2 = 93%)。根据样本量进行分组分析(大于 2000 或结论:周末入院不会产生不良影响:周末入院不会对脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的死亡率产生不利影响。由于研究间的高度异质性和各研究调整的混杂因素的差异,在解释结果时必须谨慎。
{"title":"Effect of weekend admission on mortality risk in patients with sepsis and septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Haiyan Xiong, Linlin Shi","doi":"10.1177/00369330231189887","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00369330231189887","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is an ongoing debate if weekend admissions of critically ill patients are associated with higher mortality rates. The current review aimed to specifically assess this effect in sepsis and septic shock patients by comparing mortality rates with weekend versus weekday admissions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to 20th February 2023 with an additional search of Google Scholar for gray literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies were eligible. Meta-analysis of all nine studies with data from 1,134,417 patients demonstrated that sepsis or septic shock patients admitted on weekends don't have higher mortality as compared to those admitted on weekdays (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.09; p = 0.05; I<sup>2 </sup>= 93%). On subgroup analysis based on sample size (>2000 or <2000 patients) and timing of mortality, we noted no difference in the significance of the results. However, there was a small significant increased risk of mortality with weekend admission noted in studies on the Asian population and including septic shock patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Weekend admission does not have an adverse impact on mortality rates of sepsis and septic shock patients. Results must be interpreted with caution owing to high interstudy heterogeneity and variation in confounders adjusted by individual studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":"68 3","pages":"91-100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10174576","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.1177/00369330231163378
Tmam Al-Ghunaim, Judith Johnson, Chandra S Biyani, Marina Yiasemidou, Daryl B O'Connor
Background: Surgeons in the UK report high burnout levels. Burnout has been found to be associated with adverse patient outcomes but there are few studies that have examined this association in surgeons and even fewer which have examined this relationship over time.
Purpose: The main aim was to examine the relationships between surgeon burnout and surgeons' perceptions of patient safety cross-sectionally and longitudinally. The secondary aim was to test whether surgeons' burnout levels varied over the first six months of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
Methods: This paper reports data from a two-wave survey (first wave from 5 May and 30 June 2020, the second wave 5 January to 30 February 2021). The dataset was divided into a longitudinal group (for surgeons who responded at both the time points) and two cross-sectional groups (for surgeons who responded at a one-time point, but not the other).
Results: The first key finding was that burnout was associated with patient safety outcomes measured at the same time point (Group 1 = 108, r = 0.309,p < 0.05 and Group 2 = 84, r = 0.238, p < 0.05). Second, burnout predicted poor patients' safety perceptions over time, and poor patient safety predicted burnout over time (Group 3 = 39, p < 0.05). Third, burnout increased between the first and second surveys (t = -4.034, p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Burnout in surgeons may have serious implications for patient safety. Interventions to support surgeons should be prioritised, and healthcare organisations, surgeons and psychological specialists should collaborate on their development.
背景:据报道,英国外科医生的职业倦怠程度很高。人们发现,职业倦怠与患者的不良预后有关,但很少有研究对外科医生的这种关联进行调查,而对这种长期关系进行调查的研究就更少了。目的:主要目的是横向和纵向研究外科医生职业倦怠与外科医生对患者安全的认知之间的关系。第二个目的是测试外科医生的倦怠水平在2019年冠状病毒大流行的前六个月是否有所不同。方法:本文报告了两波调查数据(第一波从2020年5月5日至6月30日,第二波从2021年1月5日至2月30日)。数据集被分为纵向组(在两个时间点都有反应的外科医生)和两个横断面组(在一个时间点有反应的外科医生,但没有其他时间点)。结果:第一个关键发现是在同一时间点测量的患者安全结局与倦怠相关(组1 = 108,r = 0.309, p < 0.05;组2 = 84,r = 0.238, p < 0.05)。其次,倦怠可预测患者安全感知随时间的变化,患者安全感知差可预测患者倦怠随时间的变化(组3 = 39,p < 0.05)。第三,倦怠感在第一次和第二次调查中有所增加(t = -4.034, p < 0.05)。结论:外科医生的职业倦怠可能严重影响患者安全。应该优先考虑支持外科医生的干预措施,医疗机构、外科医生和心理专家应该合作开发这些干预措施。
{"title":"Burnout and patient safety perceptions among surgeons in the United Kingdom during the early phases of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A two-wave survey.","authors":"Tmam Al-Ghunaim, Judith Johnson, Chandra S Biyani, Marina Yiasemidou, Daryl B O'Connor","doi":"10.1177/00369330231163378","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330231163378","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgeons in the UK report high burnout levels. Burnout has been found to be associated with adverse patient outcomes but there are few studies that have examined this association in surgeons and even fewer which have examined this relationship over time.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The main aim was to examine the relationships between surgeon burnout and surgeons' perceptions of patient safety cross-sectionally and longitudinally. The secondary aim was to test whether surgeons' burnout levels varied over the first six months of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This paper reports data from a two-wave survey (first wave from 5 May and 30 June 2020, the second wave 5 January to 30 February 2021). The dataset was divided into a longitudinal group (for surgeons who responded at both the time points) and two cross-sectional groups (for surgeons who responded at a one-time point, but not the other).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first key finding was that burnout was associated with patient safety outcomes measured at the same time point (Group 1 = 108, <i>r =</i> 0.309<i>,</i> <i>p</i> < 0.05 and Group 2 = 84, <i>r = </i>0.238, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Second, burnout predicted poor patients' safety perceptions over time, and poor patient safety predicted burnout over time (Group 3 = 39, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Third, burnout increased between the first and second surveys (<i>t</i> = -4.034, <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Burnout in surgeons may have serious implications for patient safety. Interventions to support surgeons should be prioritised, and healthcare organisations, surgeons and psychological specialists should collaborate on their development.</p>","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":"68 2","pages":"41-48"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067362/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9500680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-01DOI: 10.1177/00369330231163375
Mohammed Gadoora Fadelalla, Sabreen Elbakri, Michael Poon
Introduction: Intraoperative feedback can be associated with improved surgical performance. Quality feedback can reduce the time required by trainees to achieve proficiency in psychomotor skills. Operative training time has become increasingly limited, and it has become imperative to use surgical training time effectively.
Aim: In this survey, we assessed trainees' perspectives of intraoperative feedback. We included several aspects of feedback including its occurrence, quality, and potential barriers.
Methods: All surgical trainees in a single centre were invited to complete an electronic questionnaire. Participants were anonymised. We summarised data using descriptive statistics.
Results: Most trainees (85%) reported they had the opportunity to share their training goals with trainers. Just under three-quarters of trainees felt they always or sometimes got timely feedback. Only half of the trainees were signposted to feedback and 23% felt feedback was not part of their department's culture. Half of the trainees did not always feel comfortable asking for feedback from their trainers stating their reasons as fear of criticism, lack of time and competing clinical commitments.
Conclusion: There is no denying the importance of feedback on operative performance, however, this survey shows that many of the pillars of quality feedback are poorly adhered to.
{"title":"Intraoperative feedback: A survey of surgical trainees' perspective.","authors":"Mohammed Gadoora Fadelalla, Sabreen Elbakri, Michael Poon","doi":"10.1177/00369330231163375","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330231163375","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intraoperative feedback can be associated with improved surgical performance. Quality feedback can reduce the time required by trainees to achieve proficiency in psychomotor skills. Operative training time has become increasingly limited, and it has become imperative to use surgical training time effectively.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>In this survey, we assessed trainees' perspectives of intraoperative feedback. We included several aspects of feedback including its occurrence, quality, and potential barriers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All surgical trainees in a single centre were invited to complete an electronic questionnaire. Participants were anonymised. We summarised data using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most trainees (85%) reported they had the opportunity to share their training goals with trainers. Just under three-quarters of trainees felt they always or sometimes got timely feedback. Only half of the trainees were signposted to feedback and 23% felt feedback was not part of their department's culture. Half of the trainees did not always feel comfortable asking for feedback from their trainers stating their reasons as fear of criticism, lack of time and competing clinical commitments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is no denying the importance of feedback on operative performance, however, this survey shows that many of the pillars of quality feedback are poorly adhered to.</p>","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":"68 2","pages":"58-62"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9502961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}