Seminars in hematology最新文献

Liquid biopsies utilizing plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are anticipated to revolutionize decision-making in cancer care. In the field of lymphomas, ctDNA-based blood tests represent the forefront of clinically applicable tools to harness decades of genomic research for disease profiling, quantification, and detection. More recently, the discovery of nonrandom fragmentation patterns in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has opened another avenue of liquid biopsy research beyond mutational interrogation of ctDNA. Through examination of structural features, nucleotide content, and genomic distribution of massive numbers of plasma cfDNA molecules, the study of fragmentomics aims at identifying new tools that augment existing ctDNA-based analyses and discover new ways to profile cancer from blood tests. Indeed, the characterization of aberrant lymphoma ctDNA fragment patterns and harnessing them with powerful machine-learning techniques are expected to unleash the potential of nonmutant molecules for liquid biopsy purposes. In this article, we review cfDNA fragmentomics as an emerging approach in the ctDNA research of B-cell lymphomas. We summarize the biology behind the formation of cfDNA fragment patterns and discuss the preanalytical and technical limitations faced with current methodologies. Then we go through the advances in the field of lymphomas and envision what other noninvasive tools based on fragment characteristics could be explored. Last, we place fragmentomics as one of the facets of ctDNA analyses in emerging multiview and multiomics liquid biopsies. We pay attention to the unknowns in the field of cfDNA fragmentation biology that warrant further mechanistic investigation to provide rational background for the development of these precision oncology tools and understanding of their limitations.

Hodgkin lymphoma is a B-cell lymphoma often affecting young adults. Outcomes following intensive chemo- and radiotherapy are generally favourable but leave patients at high risk for early and late toxicities frequently reducing quality of life. Relapsed/refractory disease is regularly difficult to treat and ultimately results in death in a relevant subset of patients. Current strategies for risk stratification and response evaluation rely on clinical features and imaging only, and lack discriminatory power to detect patients at risk for disease progression. Here, we explore how circulating tumor DNA sequencing might help to overcome these shortcomings. We provide an overview over recent technical and methodological developments and suggest potential use cases for different clinical situations. Circulating tumor DNA sequencing offers the potential to significantly augment current risk stratification strategies with the ultimate goal of further individualizing treatment strategies for patients with HL.

Detection and characterization of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in body fluids have the potential to revolutionize management of patients with lymphoma. Minimal access to malignant DNA through a simple blood draw or lumbar puncture is particularly appealing for CNS lymphomas (CNSL), which cannot be easily or repeatedly sampled without invasive surgeries. Profiling of ctDNA provides a real-time snapshot of the genetic composition in patients with CNSL and enables ultrasensitive quantification of lymphoma burden at any given time point during the course of the disease. Here, we broadly review technical challenges of ctDNA identification in CNSL, recent advances of innovative liquid biopsy technologies, potential clinical applications of ctDNA and how it may improve CNSL risk stratification, outcome prediction, and monitoring of measurable residual disease. Finally, we discuss clinical trials and scenarios in which ctDNA could be implemented to guide risk-adapted and personalized treatment decisions.

Apart from the MYD88^L265P mutation, extensive information exists on the molecular mechanisms in Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia and its potential utility in the diagnosis and treatment tailoring. However, no consensus recommendations are yet available. Consensus Panel 3 (CP3) of the 11th International Workshop on Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (IWWM-11) was tasked with reviewing the current molecular necessities and best way to access the minimum data required for a correct diagnosis and monitoring. Key recommendations from IWWM-11 CP3 included: (1) molecular studies are warranted for patients in whom therapy is going to be started; such studies should also be done in those whose bone marrow (BM) material is sampled based on clinical issues; (2) molecular studies considered essential for these situations are those that clarify the status of 6q and 17p chromosomes, and MYD88, CXCR4, and TP53 genes. These tests in other situations, and/or other tests, are considered optional; (3) independently of the use of more sensitive and/or specific techniques, the minimum requirements are allele specific polymerase chain reaction for MYD88^L265P and CXCR4^S338X using whole BM, and fluorescence in situ hybridization for 6q and 17p and sequencing for CXCR4 and TP53 using CD19+ enriched BM; (4) these requirements refer to all patients; therefore, sample should be sent to specialized centers.

Recent advances in the understanding of Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) biology have impacted the development of effective novel agents and improved our knowledge of how the genomic background of WM may influence selection of therapy. Consensus Panel 7 (CP7) of the 11th International Workshop on WM was convened to examine the current generation of completed and ongoing clinical trials involving novel agents, consider updated data on WM genomics, and make recommendations on the design and prioritization of future clinical trials. CP7 considers limited duration and novel-novel agent combinations to be the priority for the next generation of clinical trials. Evaluation of MYD88, CXCR4 and TP53 at baseline in the context of clinical trials is crucial. The common chemoimmunotherapy backbones, bendamustine-rituximab (BR) and dexamethasone, rituximab and cyclophosphamide (DRC), may be considered standard-of-care for the frontline comparative studies. Key unanswered questions include the definition of frailty in WM; the importance of attaining a very good partial response or better (≥VGPR), within stipulated time frame, in determining survival outcomes; and the optimal treatment of WM populations with special needs

Consensus Panel 5 (CP5) of the 11th International Workshop on Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (IWWM-11; held in October 2022) was tasked with reviewing the current data on the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) prophylaxis and management in patients with Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (WM). The key recommendations from IWWM-11 CP5 included the following: Booster vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 should be recommended to all patients with WM. Variant-specific booster vaccines, such as the bivalent vaccine for the ancestral Wuhan strain and the Omicron BA.4.5 strain, are important as novel mutants emerge and become dominant in the community. A temporary interruption in Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase-inhibitor (BTKi) or chemoimmunotherapy before vaccination might be considered. Patients under treatment with rituximab or BTK-inhibitors have lower antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2; thus, they should continue to follow preventive measures, including mask wearing and avoiding crowded places. Patients with WM are candidates for preexposure prophylaxis, if available and relevant to the dominant SARS-CoV-2 strains in a specific area. Oral antivirals should be offered to all symptomatic WM patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 regardless of vaccination, disease status or treatment, as soon as possible after the positive test and within 5 days of COVID-19-related symptom onset. Coadministration of ibrutinib or venetoclax with ritonavir should be avoided. In these patients, remdesivir offers an effective alternative. Patients with asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic COVID-19 should not interrupt treatment with a BTK inhibitor. Infection prophylaxis is essential in patients with WM and include general preventive measures, prophylaxis with antivirals and vaccination against common pathogens including SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and S. pneumoniae.

Consensus Panel 4 (CP4) of the 11th International Workshop on Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (IWWM-11) was tasked with reviewing the current criteria for diagnosis and response assessment. Since the initial consensus reports of the 2nd International Workshop, there have been updates in the understanding of the mutational landscape of IgM related diseases, including the discovery and prevalence of MYD88 and CXCR4 mutations; an improved recognition of disease related morbidities attributed to monoclonal IgM and tumor infiltration; and a better understanding of response assessment based on multiple, prospective trials that have evaluated diverse agents in Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia. The key recommendations from IWWM-11 CP4 included: (1) reaffirmation of IWWM-2 consensus panel recommendations that arbitrary values for laboratory parameters such as minimal IgM level or bone marrow infiltration should not be used to distinguish Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia from IgM MGUS; (2) delineation of IgM MGUS into 2 subclasses including a subtype characterized by clonal plasma cells and MYD88 wild-type, and the other by presence of monotypic or monoclonal B cells which may carry the MYD88 mutation; and (3) recognition of “simplified” response assessments that use serum IgM only for determining partial and very good partial responses (simplified IWWM-6/new IWWM-11 response criteria). Guidance on response determination for suspected IgM flare and IgM rebound related to treatment, as well as extramedullary disease assessment was also updated and included in this report.

Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by the presence of lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) in the bone marrow accompanied by a monoclonal immunoglobulin type M (IgM) in the serum. WM was first described only 80 years ago and became reportable in the US as a malignancy in 1988. Very little systematic research was conducted prior to 2000 to characterize incidence, clinical characteristics, risk factors or diagnostic and prognostic criteria, and there were essentially no WM-specific clinical interventional trials. Since the inaugural meeting of the International Workshop in Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (IWWM) in 2000, WM has become the focus of a steadily increasing and productive body of research, engaging a growing number of investigators throughout the world. This introductory overview provides summary of the current understanding of the epidemiology of WM/LPL as a backdrop for a series of consensus panel recommendations arising from research presented at the 11th IWWM.

The consensus panel 2 (CP2) of the 11th International Workshop on Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (IWWM-11) has reviewed and incorporated current data to update the recommendations for treatment approaches in patients with relapsed or refractory WM (RRWM). The key recommendations from IWWM-11 CP2 include: (1) Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) and/or a covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase (cBTKi) strategies are important options; their use should reflect the prior upfront strategy and are subject to their availability. (2) In selecting treatment, biological age, co-morbidities and fitness are important; nature of relapse, disease phenotype and WM-related complications, patient preferences and hematopoietic reserve are also critical factors while the composition of the BM disease and mutational status (MYD88, CXCR4, TP53) should also be noted. (3) The trigger for initiating treatment in RRWM should utilize knowledge of patients’ prior disease characteristics to avoid unnecessary delays. (4) Risk factors for cBTKi related toxicities (cardiovascular dysfunction, bleeding risk and concurrent medication) should be addressed when choosing cBTKi. Mutational status (MYD88, CXCR4) may influence the cBTKi efficacy, and the role of TP53 disruptions requires further study) in the event of cBTKi failure dose intensity could be up titrated subject to toxicities. Options after BTKi failure include CIT with a non-cross-reactive regimen to one previously used CIT, addition of anti-CD20 antibody to BTKi, switching to a newer cBTKi or non-covalent BTKi, proteasome inhibitors, BCL-2 inhibitors, and new anti-CD20 combinations are additional options. Clinical trial participation should be encouraged for all patients with RRWM.