Seminars in hematology最新文献

Consensus Panel 1 (CP1) of the 11^th International Workshop on Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (IWWM-11) was tasked with updating guidelines for the management of symptomatic, treatment-naïve patients with WM. The panel reiterated that watchful waiting remains the gold standard for asymptomatic patients without critically elevated IgM or compromised hematopoietic function. For first-line treatment, chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) regimens such as dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, rituximab (DRC), or bendamustine, rituximab (Benda-R) continue to play a central role in managing WM, as they are effective, of fixed duration, generally well-tolerated, and affordable. Covalent BTK inhibitors (cBTKi) offer a continuous, generally well-tolerated alternative for the primary treatment of WM patients, particularly those unsuitable for CIT. In a Phase III randomized trial updated at IWWM-11, the second-generation cBTKi, zanubrutinib, was less toxic than ibrutinib and induced deeper remissions, thus categorizing zanubrutinib as a suitable treatment option in WM. While the overall findings of a prospective, randomized trial updated at IWWM-11 did not show superiority of fixed duration rituximab maintenance over observation following attainment of a major response to Benda-R induction, a subset analysis showed benefit in patients >65 years and those with a high IPPSWM score. Whenever possible, the mutational status of MYD88 and CXCR4 should be determined before treatment initiation, as alterations in these 2 genes predict sensitivity towards cBTKi activity. Treatment approaches for WM-associated cryoglobulins, cold agglutinins, AL amyloidosis, Bing-Neel syndrome (BNS), peripheral neuropathy, and hyperviscosity syndrome follow the common principle of reducing tumor and abnormal protein burden rapidly and deeply to improve symptoms. In BNS, ibrutinib can be highly active and produce durable responses. In contrast, cBTKi are not recommended for treating AL amyloidosis. The panel emphasized that continuous improvement of treatment options for symptomatic, treatment-naïve WM patients critically depends on the participation of patients in clinical trials, whenever possible.

Consensus Panel 6 (CP6) of the 11th International Workshop on Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (IWWM-11) was tasked with reviewing the state of the art for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy of AL amyloidosis associated with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). Since significant advances have been made in the management of AL amyloidosis an update for this rare disease associated with WM was necessary. The key recommendations from IWWM-11 CP6 included: (1) The need to improve the diagnostic process by recognizing red flags and using biomarkers and imaging; (2) The essential tests for appropriate workup; (3) The diagnostic flowchart, including mandatory amyloid typing, that improves the differential diagnosis with transthyretin amyloidosis; (4) Criteria for therapy response assessment; (5) State of the art of the treatment including therapy of wild type transthyretin amyloidosis associated with WM.

The translation of natural killer (NK) cells to the treatment of malignant disease has made significant progress in the last few decades. With a variety of available sources and improvements in both in vitro and in vivo NK cell expansion, the NK cell immunotherapy platform has come into its own. The enormous effort continues to further optimize this platform, including ways to enhance NK cell persistence, trafficking to the tumor microenvironment, and cytotoxicity. As this effort bears fruit, it is translated into a plethora of clinical trials in patients with advanced malignancies. The adoptive transfer of NK cells, either as a standalone therapy or in combination with other immunotherapies, has been applied for the treatment of both liquid and solid tumors, with numerous early-phase trials showing promising results. This review aims to summarize the key advantages of NK cell immunotherapy, highlight several of the current approaches being taken for its optimization, and give an overview of the landscape of clinical trials translating this platform into clinic.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been used as a curative standard of care for moderate to severe primary immunodeficiency disorders as well as relapsed hematologic malignancies for over 50 years [1,2]. However, chronic and refractory viral infections remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the immune deficient period following HSCT, where use of available antiviral pharmacotherapies is limited by toxicity and emerging resistance [3]. Adoptive immunotherapy using virus-specific T cells (VSTs) has been explored for over 2 decades [4,5] in patients post-HSCT and has been shown prior phase I-II studies to be safe and effective for treatment or preventions of viral infections including cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, BK virus, and adenovirus with minimal toxicity and low risk of graft vs host disease [6-9]. This review summarizes methodologies to generate VSTs the clinical results utilizing VST therapeutics and the challenges and future directions for the field.

CAR T-cells have revolutionized the treatment of many hematological malignancies. Thousands of patients with lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and multiple myeloma have received this “living medicine” and achieved durable remissions. Their place in therapy continues to evolve, and there is ongoing development of new generation CAR constructs, CAR T-cells against solid tumors and CAR T-cells against chronic infections like human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B. A significant fraction of CAR T-cell recipients, unfortunately, develop infections. This is in part due to factors intrinsic to the patient, but also to the treatment, which requires lymphodepletion (LD), causes neutropenia and hypogammaglobulinemia and necessarily increases the state of immunosuppression of the patient. The goal of this review is to present the infectious complications of CAR T-cell therapy, explain their temporal course and risk factors, and provide recommendations for their prevention, diagnosis, and management.

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is associated with significant morbidity and shortened life expectancy. Similarly, patients with transfusion dependent beta thalassemia (TdT) require life-long transfusion therapy, chelation therapy and significant organ dysfunction. Allogeneic transplantation from a matched family donor provided the only curative option for patients with SCD and TdT. Unfortunately, less than 20% of patients have a fully matched related donor and results using unrelated donor transplant were associated with high rate of complications. Ex vivo gene therapy through globin gene addition has been investigated extensively and recent encouraging preliminary data resulted in regulatory approval in patients with TdT. Recent improvements in our understanding of the molecular pathways controlling erythropoiesis and globin switching from fetal hemoglobin to adult hemoglobin offer a new and exciting therapeutic options. Rapid and substantial advances in genome editing tools using CRISPR/Cas9, have raised the possibility of genetic editing and correction in patient derived hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. We will review results of gene editing approach that can induce fetal hemoglobin production in patients with SCD and TdT.

The landscape of therapeutic options for B cell malignancies has fundamentally changed with regulatory and marketing approval of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T cell products. The cell types used for CAR-T production, the length of time of manufacture, the stimulation matrix, and the nature of the gene vector used to transduce human T cells all are significant variables that require adequate quality control before infusion. Having approved products available to clinicians using a centralized production paradigm has not stopped innovation in investigator-initiated trials. Moreover, the high costs of the commercial products have been a significant wake-up call to those concerned about rising costs in health care, and the ability of developing nations, and nations with managed care systems to support these costs. Place-of-care manufacturing is a clear alternative to the approved products created in a centralized manufacturing approach. It is supported by continued technological innovation and the willingness of clinicians to develop new ways to decrease costs and make these curative therapies equitably available.