Progression of chronic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes has been understood conventionally as a consequence of intraglomerular hemodynamic changes and aberrant metabolic pathways. However, an increasing body of experimental evidence has highlighted the role of inflammatory response in the progression of diabetic kidney disease. Macrophage polarization in response to specific microenvironmental stimuli affects the pathology of diabetic kidneys. The diabetic milieu also up-regulates inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules, and promotes inflammatory signal transduction pathways, including inflammasomes. Therefore, from a reverse translational perspective, modulation of the inflammatory response may be the driving force of the renoprotective effects of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, all of which have been shown to slow disease progression. Currently, many agents that target the inflammation in the kidneys directly are evaluated in clinical trials. This article discusses recent clinical and experimental milestones in drug development for diabetic kidney disease with a perspective on inflammation in the kidneys. Such insights may enable a targeted approach to discovering novel drugs against chronic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes.
Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) remains a major health care issue and is beset with significant racial and ethnic disparities in regard to its incidence, progression, and complication rate. An individual's health is influenced strongly by an array of societal-level factors commonly called the social determinants of health. Among these, DKD is influenced highly by structured resources and opportunities, as well as an individual's socioeconomic status, health insurance status, access to care, education, health literacy, nutrition, green space exposure, level of trust in the medical community, and more. Health equity is considered a state in which everyone has a fair and just opportunity to attain his or her highest level of health. Conversely, health inequities are a consequence of a structured discriminatory system of inequitable allocation of social determinants of health. When this discriminatory system is race-based it is referred to as structural racism, which eventually leads to racial and ethnic health disparities. The further downstream sequela of structural racism, consciously or unconsciously, impacts health systems, providers, and patients, and can lead to disparities in DKD development, progression, and complications. In this article, we explore potential interventions at the societal, health system, and provider levels that can help flatten the playing field and reduce racial and ethnic disparities in DKD.
The good old days were not good, at least in terms of treating patients with type 2 diabetes. In the 1960s, the development of a radioimmunoassay for insulin permitted determination of the distinguishing features of type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The latter was treated with sulfonylureas and then phenformin, although the mechanisms of action at the time were unknown. The University Group Diabetes Program was a randomized controlled trial experienced by my medical generation, and the results were dramatic, both medically and legally. Next came the thiazolidinediones. All compounds were associated with weight gain and any end point benefits were uncertain. Nevertheless, basic science explained how glucose is sensed and even found a home for sulfonylureas in some patients. Next came the boom in renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade, sacred ground for many, albeit the benefits were less than astounding. Other wonder drugs came and went. Over the decades, great strides were made in defining the pathology of diabetic renal disease, which is appropriate because the condition has become a primary cause of end-stage renal failure. Nonetheless, recent advances have turned around a depressing situation and are reasons for optimism. We now have compounds that actually could help patients with type 2 diabetes. One hundred years after insulin's introduction, it is high time.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) represents a particularly challenging diabetes complication. Diabetes now is responsible for half of all cases of CKD, thus making diabetes the most common cause of kidney failure worldwide. In patients with diabetes, CKD frequently coexists with heart failure and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, which together are associated with marked increases in the risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Fortunately, new therapeutic agents from several classes now are available with proven benefits for kidney and heart protection when used in patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD. Agents from the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, glucagon-like peptide-1–receptor agonist, and nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonist classes now are considered standard of care to improve kidney, heart, and overall survival outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. Efforts to educate health care providers on the benefits of these therapies are critically needed to help increase their utilization and improve clinical outcomes. Care decisions should be driven by a holistic view of patient priorities and goals with consideration of a multimodal therapeutic approach to maximize heart and kidney benefits.