Spine deformity最新文献

Purpose: Neurological deficits developing years after pedicle screw misplacement is a rare phenomenon. Here, we report level IV evidence of a previously asymptomatic medial thoracic pedicle screw resulting in paraparesis after a motor vehicle accident.

Methods: A 21-year-old male presented with acute onset of paraparesis following a motor vehicle collision. Six years prior this incident, the patient underwent a thoracolumbar fusion T4-L4 for AIS performed by an outside orthopedic surgeon. CT scan and CT myelogram illustrated decreased spinal canal diameter and cord compression from a medial T8 pedicle screw.

Results: Surgical removal of the misplaced pedicle screw resulted in a gradual complete recovery sustained over a period of 2 years. This case is compared to those reported in the literature review between 1981 and 2019 concerning delayed neurological deterioration related to misplaced pedicle screw.

Conclusion: This case reports a delayed neurological deficit implicating a misplaced pedicle screw. This phenomenon remains rare since 5 cases were reported in the literature over the last 4 decades. It calls into focus the need for confirmation of safe instrumentation during the intraoperative period. It also illustrates the potential difficult decision-making in regard to asymptomatic misplaced instrumentation.

Level of evidence: IV.

Purpose: It aims to investigate the lumbar and pelvic morphology in congenital scoliosis with thoracolumbar hemivertebrae and its impact on proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) incidence after hemivertebra resection and short fusion.

Methods: 23 congenital scoliosis patients with thoracolumbar hemivertebra aged between 10 and 18 years were enrolled in the retrospective study. Spinopelvic sagittal parameters were analyzed on whole-spine standing lateral radiographs preoperatively, one-week postoperatively and at the final follow-up. Pearson correlations were calculated for local kyphosis (LK), lumbar and pelvic morphology parameters. Binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis were performed to identify the risk factors for PJK.

Results: Thoracolumbar hemivertebra caused LK of 29.2° ± 17.3°, an increased lumbar lordosis (LL) (-64.7° ± 16.3°), lower LL apex (52.2% at L5), and small pelvic incidence (PI) (36.8° ± 6.6°). LK was correlated with lumbar morphology parameters, including LL (r = - 0.837), upper arc of LL (LLUA) (r = - 0.879), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK) (r = 0.933), thoracic kyphosis (TK) (r = 0.762) and TK apex (TKA) (r = - 0.749). Surgical treatment improved the lumbar morphology, but not pelvic morphology. At the final follow-up, LL had returned to its preoperative value (p = 0.158). PJK occurred in 30.4% of cases as a compensatory mechanism. Preoperatively, significant differences of parameters between non-PJK and PJK groups were observed in LK and TLK. Binary logistic regression identified three independent risk factors for PJK: preoperative LLA (OR = 0.005, 95%CI = 0.000-0.287, p = 0.011), preoperative TLK (OR = 1.134, 95%CI = 1.001-1.286, p = 0.048), and preoperative lumbar lordosis morphology type (OR = 5.507, 95%CI = 1.202-25.227, p = 0.028). However, residual LK after surgery was not correlated with PJK incidence. ROC curve analysis verified that preoperative TLK > 22.59° was associated with increased PJK incidence after surgery.

Conclusions: Lumbar morphology changes as a compensatory mechanism beneath the thoracolumbar hemivertebra. However, a stable pelvis tends to allow the LL to return to its preoperative value. PJK occurred as a cranial compensatory mechanism for increasing LL and corrected TLK. A larger TLK (> 22.59°) was an independent risk factor for PJK incidence in patients with type 2 and 3A lumbar lordosis morphology.

Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel technique of formal reduction and circumferential fusion for pediatric high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS).

Purpose: The safety and efficacy of formal reduction for high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS) has never been thoroughly examined. This study reports the outcomes of 29 children with HGS who underwent a procedure of gradual reduction and circumferential fusion.

Methods: 29 children (13 males, 16 females) were recruited between 2006 and 2010. Radiographic measurements (including % of slip, lumbosacral angle-LSA, pelvic incidence-PI, pelvic tilt-PT, sacral slope-SS, and proximal femoral angle-PFA) and quality of life assessment (SRS-22 questionnaire) were prospectively obtained at baseline and at the last post-operative follow-up (> 2 years post-op). Radiological measurements were used to classify patients according to the Spine Deformity Study Group (SDSG) classification.

Results: Mean baseline slip % was 69.9 ± 16.5%. There were 13 patients with a balanced pelvic (SDSG Type 4) and 16 with an unbalanced pelvis (SDSG Type 5 and 6). On average, a reduction of 45.5 ± 15.3% (range 20-86%) was achieved safely with no major complication. In particular, of the 29 patients, only 3 had a L5 radiculopathy postoperatively that was self-resolved at follow-up. From a radiological standpoint, we observed a mean improvement of LSA from 80.3 ± 17.9° to 91.7 ± 13.6°. We also observed a statistically significant improvement in global HRQOL, and in the function and body image domains.

Conclusion: This prospective study suggests that formal reduction of HGS followed by circumferential fusion is safe when using a standardized surgical technique based on gradual reduction. Performing this intervention could also help improve QOL in some patients.

Purpose: To review the current literature surrounding the assessment of self-image in pediatric and adult spinal deformity.

Methods: The literature were reviewed for studies examining patient-reported outcome measurements (PROM) and self-image in pediatric and adult spinal deformity. PROM performance metrics were collected and described. The relationships between self-image PROM and patient outcomes, including satisfaction, were described.

Results: Several self-image PROM exist, including the Scoliosis Research Society-22r (SRS-22r) self-image domain, the Body Image Disturbance Questionnaire (BIDQ), and the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ). The most commonly used is the self-image domain of the SRS-22r. It is validated in adult and pediatric spinal deformity and is correlated with patient desire for surgery and satisfaction after surgery. This domain is limited by floor and ceiling effects.

Conclusion: Self-image assessment is critical to both pediatric and adult spinal deformity surgeries. The SRS-22r self-image domain is the most frequently reported PROM for this health domain. While valid in both surgical cohorts, this PROM is affected by floor and ceiling effects which limits the ability to discriminate between health states. Given the overall importance of this domain to patients with spinal deformity further efforts are needed to improve discrimination without gross increases in PROM question burden, which may limit broad acceptance and use.

Purpose: Preoperative counting of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae is crucial in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) due to reported anatomical variations and potential surgical site misidentification. This study investigated characteristics associated with the vertebral number variations AIS, particularly focusing on rib morphology.

Methods: Based on three-dimensional computed tomography, patients were categorized into the non-variant number group, comprising individuals with 12 thoracic and 5 lumbar vertebrae, and the variant number group, comprising individuals with different numbers of vertebrae. Additionally, the most caudal rib morphology was classified as normal, unilateral, or hypoplastic.

Results: A total of 359 patients were included in our study (41 males, 318 females, age: 16.3 ± 3.1 years), with 44 patients (12.3%) assigned to the variant number group. Logistic regression analysis identified unilateral ribs (odds ratio [OR]: 10.50) and lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) (OR 6.49) as significant risk factors associated with variations. Further analysis revealed hypoplastic ribs as a significant risk factor associated with LSTV (OR: 4.58). 8 CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that abnormal rib morphology may be associated with vertebral number variations. Close attention to rib morphology is, therefore, warranted in cases with atypical vertebral numbers. Accordingly, to ensure surgical safety and accuracy, spine surgeons must communicate these variations to the surgical team, standardize nomenclature for describing them, and intraoperatively verify fusion levels with them.

Purpose: Early onset scoliosis (EOS) patient diversity makes outcome prediction challenging. Machine learning offers an innovative approach to analyze patient data and predict results, including LOS in pediatric spinal deformity surgery.

Methods: Children under 10 with EOS were chosen from the American College of Surgeon's NSQIP database. Extended LOS, defined as over 5 days, was predicted using feature selection and machine learning in Python. The best model, determined by the area under the curve (AUC), was optimized and used to create a risk calculator for prolonged LOS.

Results: The study included 1587 patients, mostly young (average age: 6.94 ± 2.58 years), with 33.1% experiencing prolonged LOS (n = 526). Most patients were female (59.2%, n = 940), with an average BMI of 17.0 ± 8.7. Factors influencing LOS were operative time, age, BMI, ASA class, levels operated on, etiology, nutritional support, pulmonary and neurologic comorbidities. The gradient boosting model performed best with a test accuracy of 0.723, AUC of 0.630, and a Brier score of 0.189, leading to a patient-specific risk calculator for prolonged LOS.

Conclusions: Machine learning algorithms accurately predict extended LOS across a national patient cohort and characterize key preoperative drivers of increased LOS after PSIF in pediatric patients with EOS.

Purpose: Postoperative physical therapy (PT) is a cornerstone of orthopedic and musculoskeletal rehabilitation, proven to provide various positive clinical benefits. However, there is a paucity of literature evaluating the utility of preoperative rehabilitation specific to spine surgery. Thus, this review article aims to provide an overview of previously published studies discussing the efficacy of preoperative rehabilitation programs and its role in spinal surgery. Special emphasis was given to preoperative frailty assessments, physical performance tests, interventional strategies, feasibility, and future directions.

Methods: We performed a literature review using PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and PubMed Central (PMC) using directed search terms. Articles that examined preoperative rehabilitation in adult spine surgery were compiled for this review. Prehabilitation programs focused on exercise, flexibility, and behavioral modifications have been shown to significantly improve pain levels and functional strength assessments in patients undergoing elective spine surgery. In addition, studies suggest that these programs may also decrease hospital stays, return to work time, and overall direct health care expenditure costs. Screening tools such as the FRAIL scale can be used to assess frailty while physical function tests like the timed-up-and go (TUGT), 5 repetition sit-to-stand test (5R-STST), and hand grip strength (HGS) can help identify patients who would most benefit from prehabilitation.

Conclusions: This review illustrates that prehabilitation programs have the potential to increase quality of life, improve physical function and activity levels, and decrease pain, hospital stays, return to work time, and overall direct costs. However, there is a paucity of literature in this field that requires further study and investigation.

Purpose: This study evaluated the relationship between maximal axial vertebra rotation (maxAVR) and other clinical and radiological indexes, compared to apical vertebra rotation (AVR) in idiopathic adolescent scoliosis (AIS).

Methods: Forty consecutive patients of AIS with Cobb angle of major curve > 40° were included. They were scanned by an EOS imaging system and had trunk rotational angle (TRA) measured by scoliometer. The correlation between variables was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient and loaded onto a meta-analysis model.

Results: There were (34 girls and 6 boys) with an average age of 13.8 ± 1.6 years. AVR was maxAVR in only 47.5% (19/40) cases of the major curves and 42.3% (11/26) cases of the minor curves. The correlation between maxAVR and TRA was significantly higher than the correlation between AVR and TRA for the MT curves (p = 0.0001) and TL/L curves (p = 0.0001). On multivariate regression analysis, the magnitude of maxAVR showed a significant correlation with TRA (p = 0.0002), Cobb angle (p = 0.001), and coronal deformity angular ratio (C-DAR) (p = 0.027).

Conclusions: The apical vertebra was not the most rotated in most cases. The correlation between maxAVR and TRA was significantly higher than the correlation between AVR and TRA. Moreover, the maxAVR was multivariately related to TRA, Cobb angle, and C-DAR.

Level of evidence: Level II, diagnostic.

Background: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the updated version of this software in patients with various spinal deformity.

Methods: Sixty patients were included in this study and were divided into three categories: 20 patients with AIS, 20 patients with ASD, and 20 patients having undergone corrective surgery for spinal deformity. The measurements were performed by two senior and two junior orthopedic surgery residents, and were done at two points in time separated by a 3-week interval with the cases being randomized every time to reduce the risk of memory bias. Measured parameters included coronal, sagittal, global alignment parameters, and pelvic parameters.

Results: When assessing the inter- and intra-observer reliability across all the groups of patients, none of the coefficients was smaller than 0.8 with a very high level of agreement. The standard error ranged from 0.7° to 1.5° demonstrating a high level of accuracy. Fairly similar results were seen when the groups were divided into the three categories except for the post-operative groups where a strong and not perfect level of agreement was reported.

Conclusion: This is the first study to assess the reproducibility of the new version of KEOPS, showing a very high agreement in all measurements. In the post-operative group, although it showed a strong agreement, the lower performance can be explained by the presence of surgical material making it harder to identify the anatomical landmarks accurately. Nevertheless, we can recommend the usage of this software in a clinical setting.

Purpose: This study aims to conduct a systematic review of the literature comparing pre-operative, intraoperative, and post-operative characteristics between adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and young adult idiopathic scoliosis (YAdIS) patients.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a search of the PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central databases to identify full-text articles in the English-language literature. Our inclusion criteria were studies that compared preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative characteristics between AIS and YAdIS patients. We performed a meta-analysis reporting mean difference (MD) for continuous variables and Odds ratios (ORs) to assess differences in postoperative complications.

Results: Seven studies consisting of 1562 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The AIS group exhibited less intraoperative bleeding and shorter surgical procedures, with a mean difference between groups of 122.3 ml (95% CI 46.2-198.4, p = 0.002) and 28.7 min (95% CI 6.5-50.8, p = 0.01), respectively. Although the preoperative Cobb angle did not differ between groups (p = 0.65), patients with AIS achieved superior postoperative deformity correction, with a mean difference of 7.3% between groups, MD - 7.3 (95% CI - 9.7, - 4.8, p < 0.00001), and lower postoperative Cobb angles of the major curve, MD 4.2 (95% CI 3.1, 5.3, p < 0.00001). YAdIS patients were fused, on average, 0.2 more vertebral levels than AIS patients, MD 0.2 (95% CI 0.01, 0.5, p = 0.04). AIS patients experienced a significantly shorter length of stay after the surgical procedure, with an MD of 0.8 days (95% CI 0.1, 1.6, p = 0.02). No significant difference was found between groups in terms of complications (p = 0.19).

Conclusions: YAdIS should be regarded as a distinct surgical entity, characterized by increased bleeding, longer surgical duration, greater deformity correction challenges, and the need for fusion of additional vertebral levels compared to AIS. Surgeons should be mindful of these differences and discuss them with patients and their families, especially in cases where the correction of the AIS deformity is delayed and there is a high risk of progression after skeletal maturity. Further research is needed to explore alternative surgical techniques and enhance outcomes for YAdIS patients.