Spine deformity最新文献

Purpose: The Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ) is a widely validated tool for assessing perceptions of spinal deformity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. This study aimed to develop and validate a Greek version of the SAQ (GR-SAQ).

Methods: A cross-cultural adaptation of the SAQ following international guidelines was performed. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were evaluated. Convergent validity was assessed by correlating the GR-SAQ with the Appearance domain of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) and the Cobb angle with the Trunk Shift domain of GR-SAQ. Divergent validity was examined through the relationship between GR-SAQ, patient characteristics, and clinical measures including Cobb angle, DIERS Formetric 4D angle, and scoliometer readings.

Results: The study included 61 AIS patients (52 females, 13.91 ± 2.57 years, 25.33 ± 10.14° Cobb angle). GR-SAQ exhibited good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.794) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.931, 95%CI: 0.880-0.960). Correlations between GR-SAQ and SRS-22 showed a low-to-moderate negative correlation (r = -0.351, p = 0.006). The Trunk Shift domain moderately correlated with the Cobb Angle (r = 0.393, p = 0.002). Divergent validity analyses did not demonstrate statistical significance (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The GR-SAQ is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating spinal deformity perception in Greek AIS patients.

Purpose: There is variability in clinical outcomes with vertebral body tethering (VBT) partly due to a limited understanding of the growth modulation (GM) response. We used the largest sample of patients with 3D spine reconstructions to characterize the vertebra and disc morphologic changes that accompany growth modulation during the first two years following VBT.

Methods: A multicenter registry was used to identify idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent VBT with 2 years of follow-up. Calibrated biplanar X-rays obtained at longitudinal timepoints underwent 3D reconstruction to obtain precision morphological measurements. GM was defined as change in instrumented coronal angulation from post-op to 2-years.

Results: Fifty patients (mean age: 12.5 ± 1.3yrs) were analyzed over a mean of 27.7 months. GM was positively correlated with concave vertebra height growth (r = 0.57, p < 0.001), 3D spine length growth (r = 0.36, p = 0.008), and decreased convex disc height (r = - 0.42, p = 0.002). High modulators (patients experiencing GM > 10°) experienced an additional 1.6 mm (229% increase) of mean concave vertebra growth during study period compared to the Poor Modulators (GM < - 10°) group, (2.3 vs. 0.7 mm, p = 0.039), while convex vertebra height growth was similar (1.3 vs. 1.4 mm, p = 0.91).

Conclusion: When successful, VBT enables asymmetric vertebra body growth, leading to continued postoperative coronal angulation correction (GM). A strong GM response is correlated with concave vertebral body height growth and overall instrumented spine growth. A poor GM response is associated with an increase in convex disc height (suspected tether rupture). Future studies will investigate the patient and technique-specific factors that influence increased growth remodeling.

Purpose: A hands-on-wall (HOW) position for low-dose stereoradiography of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients would allow for skeletal maturity assessment of the hand and wrist. Our aims were twofold: confirm the reliability and validity of skeletal maturity assessment using the HOW radiographs and compare the spinal and pelvic 3D parameters to those of standard hands-on-cheeks (HOC) stereoradiographs.

Methods: Seventy AIS patients underwent two successive stereoradiographs and a standard hand and wrist radiograph on the same day. Patients were randomly assigned to begin with HOW and follow with HOC, or vice versa. Raters assessed digital skeletal age (DSA), Sanders Simplified Skeletal Maturity (SSMS) and Thumb Ossification Composite Index (TOCI). 3D reconstructions of the spine and pelvis bones were performed for each stereoradiograph to measure nine clinically relevant spinal and pelvic 3D parameters.

Results: Inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities were excellent for DSA, SSMS and TOCI with both standard radiographs and HOW (ICC > 0.95). Strong correlation was found between ratings of both imaging types (ICC > 0.95). In the 3D reconstructions, kyphosis and sacral slope were slightly decreased in the HOW position, but within the clinical margin of error. All other parameters did not differ significantly between positions (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The results suggest that HOW stereoradiographs allow clinicians to assess skeletal maturity of the hand and wrist with adequate reliability and validity. We recommend that scoliosis clinics adopt the HOW position to assess skeletal maturity because there is no significant clinical impact on the spinal and pelvic evaluation, and on radiation exposure, cost or time.

Purpose: The relationship between rod curvature and postoperative radiographic results is a debated topic. One of the reasons of the heterogeneity of the observed results might reside in the lack of a validated and widely employed method to measure the curvature of the rods. Aim of this study was to present and validate a novel method for rod measurement, which is based on routine X-rays and utilizes a regression algorithm that limits manual measurements and the related errors.

Methods: Data from 20 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis/Scheuermann kyphosis (AIS/SK) patients and 35 adult spine deformity (ASD) patients for analysis, with 112 rods in total. An orthogonal reference grid was overlaid on the lateral X-ray; seven points were then marked along each rod and their coordinates recorded in a table. Using these coordinates, a third-order polynomial regression was applied to obtain the rod curvature equation (correlation coefficients > 0.97). Three observers (one surgeon, one experienced and one inexperienced observer) independently applied the developed method to measure the rod angulation of the included patients and performed the measurements twice. The reliability of the method was evaluated in terms of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altmann plot and 2S_R.

Results: The intra-observer ICCs for all measurements exceed 0.85, indicating an excellent correlation. For the AIS/SK group, the surgeon showed a slightly lower reliability compared to the other two evaluators (0.93 vs 0.98 and 0.98). However, the surgeon showed a higher reliability in measurements of the rods at the lumbar level, both for L1-S1 and L4-S1 (0.98 vs 0.96 and 0.89; 0.97 vs. 0.85 and 0.91, respectively). The variability also showed excellent results, with a mean variability ranging from 1.09° to 3.76°. The inter-observer ICCs for the three measurement groups showed an excellent reliability for the AIS/SK group (0.98). The reliability was slightly lower but still excellent for the lumbar measurements in ASD patients at L1-S1 (0.89) and L4-S1 (0.83). The results of the 2S_R for each measured segment were 4.4° for T5-T11, 5.4° for L1-S1 and 5.5° for L4-S1.

Conclusion: The described method represents a reliable and reproducible way to measure rod curvature. This method is based on routine X-rays and utilizes a regression algorithm that limits manual measurements and the related errors.

Purpose: The crankshaft phenomenon (CSP) is a corrective loss after posterior surgery for early onset scoliosis (EOS). However, an accurate method for CSP evaluation has yet to be developed. In this study, we evaluated pedicle screw (PS) length and rotation angle using an inverse trigonometric function and investigated the prevalence of the CSP.

Methods: Fifty patients from nine institutions (mean age 10.6 years, male/female ratio 4:46) who underwent early definitive fusion surgery at ≤ 11 years of age were included. The rotation angle was calculated as arctan (lateral/frontal PS length) using radiography. Measurements were taken at the apex and lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) immediate, 2-, and 5-year postoperatively. CSP was defined as a rotation angle progression ≥ 5°. We divided patients into CSP and non-CSP groups and measured the demographic parameters, Risser grade, state of the triradiate cartilage, major coronal Cobb angle, T1-T12 length, T1-S1 length, and presence of distal adding-on (DAO). We compared these variables between groups and investigated the correlation between the measured variables and vertebral rotation. Logistic regression analysis investigated factors associated with CSP.

Results: The rotation angle progressed by 2.4 and 1.3° over 5 years for the apex and LIV, respectively. CSP occurred in 15 cases (30%), DAO in 11 cases (22%), and CSP and DAO overlapped in 4 cases (8%). In the CSP group, the T1-T12 length was low immediate postoperatively. The rotation angle was negatively correlated with preoperative height (r = - 0.33), T1-T12 length (r = - 0.35), and T1-S1 length (r = - 0.30). A lower preoperative T1-T12 length was associated with CSP (odds ratio: 0.996, p = 0.048).

Conclusions: CSP occurred in 30% of patients with EOS who underwent definitive fusion. The presence of CSP was associated with a lower preoperative T1-T12 length.

Level of evidence: Diagnosis, level IV.

Purpose: To evaluate previously popular technologies in the field of spine surgery, and to better understand their advantages and limitations to the current standards of care. Spine surgery is an ever-evolving field that serves to resolve various spinal pathologies in patients of all ages. While there are established treatments for various conditions, such as lumbar spinal stenosis, idiopathic scoliosis, and degenerative lumbar disease, there is always further research and development in these areas to produce innovative technologies that can lead to better outcomes. As this process progresses, we must remind ourselves of previously tried and tested inventions and their outcomes that have fallen short of becoming a standard to ensure we are able to learn lessons from the past.

Methods: A thorough literature review was conducted with the aim of compiling literature of previously utilized technologies in spine surgery. Biomedical databases were utilized to gather relevant articles including PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Emphasis was placed on gathering articles with technologies or therapeutics aimed at treating common spinal pathologies including lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and other degenerative lumbar spine diseases. The keywords used were: "failed technologies", "historical technologies", "spine surgery", "spinal stenosis", "adolescent idiopathic scoliosis", and "degenerative lumbar spine disease". A total of 47 articles were gathered after initial review.

Results: Different technologies pertaining to spine surgery were identified and critically evaluated. Some of these technologies included X-STOP, Vertiflex, Vertebral Body Stapling, and Dynesys. These technologies were evaluated for their strengths and limitations across their spinal pathology applications. While each type of technology had their benefits, the data tended to be mixed with various limitations across studies.

Conclusion: These technologies have been trialed in the field of spine surgery across various spinal pathologies, but still prove of limited efficacy and shortcomings to the current standards of care.

Purpose: Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) remains the most common type of pediatric scoliosis, mostly affecting children between ages 10 and 18. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) offers a non-fusion alternative to the gold standard spinal fusion that permits flexibility and some growth within instrumented segments. This article will serve as a comprehensive literature review of the current state-of-the-art of VBT in relation to radiographic and clinical outcomes, complications, and the learning curve associated with the procedure.

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from April 2002 to December 2022. Studies were included if they discussed VBT and consisted of clinical studies in which a minimum 2-years follow-up was reported, and series that included anesthetic considerations, learning curve, and early operative morbidity.

Results: Forty-nine studies spanning the period from April 2002 to December 2022 were reviewed.

Conclusion: This article illustrates the potential benefits and challenges of the surgical treatment of AIS with VBT and can serve as a basis for the further study and refinement of this technique ideally as a living document that will be updated regularly.

Purpose: To evaluate whether there is a mismatch between Risser staging and the proximal humerus ossification system (PHOS); and to analyze the correlation in the skeletal maturity stages between the two humeral epiphyses.

Methods: Data from patients aged 10 to 18 years with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) seen between 2018 to 2021 were analyzed. In an anteroposterior (AP) spine radiograph the ossification process was evaluated using the Risser classification method and bilateral PHOS (if both humeral epiphyses were visualized). A mismatch between methods was defined as a Risser 0-1 (relatively skeletally immature) with a PHOS 4-5 (skeletally mature), or a Risser 2-5 (relatively skeletally mature) with a PHOS 1-3 (skeletally immature). The McNemar test was used to calculate the significance of the mismatch.

Results: A mismatch between Risser and PHOS stages was observed in 28.5% of 105 patients, which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Of the 49 patients with a Risser 0-1, 55.1% (n = 27) had a PHOS 4-5. None of the patients with a Risser 2-5 had a PHOS 1-3. In the 47 patients in whom both humeri were visualized, the absolute correlation between the left and right PHOS values was 95.7%.

Conclusion: Of AIS patients who are relatively skeletally immature according to Risser staging, more than half may be skeletally mature when measured with PHOS. In patients with a Risser 0-1, it is recommended to measure skeletal maturity in an AP spine radiograph using the PHOS method, which may more accurately guide treatment decision-making, without the need to visualize both humeral epiphyses in this radiographic projection.

Level of evidence: IV.

Purpose: This study aimed to clarify the differences in spine and total body height growth and curve progression between Sanders maturation stage (SMS) 7A and 7B in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Methods: This retrospective case-control study involving patients with AIS at SMS 7 evaluated the differential gains in the spine (T1-S1) and total body height and curve progression between SMS 7A and 7B. A validated formula was used to calculate the corrected height, accounting for height loss due to scoliosis. A multivariable non-linear and logistic regression model was applied to assess the distinct growth and curve progression patterns between the SMS 7 subtypes, adjusting for potential confounders.

Results: A total of 231 AIS patients (83% girls, mean age 13.9 ± 1.2 years) were included, with follow-up averaging 3.0 years. Patients at SMS 7A exhibited larger gains in spine height (9.9 mm vs. 6.3 mm) and total body height (19.8 mm vs. 13.4 mm) compared with SMS 7B. These findings remained consistent even after adjustments for curve magnitude. Non-linear regression models showed continued spine and total body height increases plateauing after 2 years, significantly greater in SMS 7A. More SMS 7A patients had curve progression over 10°, with an adjusted odds ratio of 3.31.

Conclusion: This study revealed that patients staged SMS 7A exhibited more spine and total body growth and a greater incidence of substantial curve progression than those at 7B. These findings imply that delaying brace discontinuation until reaching 7B could be beneficial, particularly for those with larger curves.

Level of evidence: Level III (Case-control study).

Purpose: The aim of our study is to compare anterior and posterior corrections of thoracic (Lenke I) and lumbar (Lenke V) curves when modern posterior pedicle screw systems with vertebral derotation techniques are used. Curves that could not be corrected with both systems were excluded.

Methods: A thoracic group (N = 56) of Lenke I AIS patients (18 anterior and 38 posterior) and a lumbar group (N = 42) of Lenke V patients (14 anterior and 28 posterior) with similar curves < 65° were identified.

Results: Thoracic group The mean postoperative correction (POC) was 68 ± 13.4% in the anterior and 72 ± 10.5% in the posterior group. The postoperative change in thoracic kyphosis was +4° and +5° respectively. The median length of fusion was eight segments in the posterior and seven segments in the anterior groups. In 89% the LIV was EV or shorter in the anterior, and in 71% of the posterior corrections. Lumbar group The mean POC was 75 ± 18.3% (anterior) and 72 ± 8.5% (posterior). The postoperative gain in lumbar lordosis was 0.8° (anterior) and 4° (posterior). The median length of fusion was five segments in both groups and there was no difference in relation of the LIV to the EV.

Conclusion: With modern implants and derotation techniques, the posterior approach can achieve similar coronal correction, apical derotation and thoracic kyphosis with similar length of fusion and better lumbar lordosis restoration.