Spine deformity最新文献

Purpose: To assess the effect of various pelvic fixation techniques and number of rods on biomechanics of the proximal junction of long thoracolumbar posterior instrumented fusions.

Methods: A validated spinopelvic finite-element (FE) model was instrumented with L5-S1 ALIF and one of the following 9 posterior instrumentation configurations: (A) one traditional iliac screw bilaterally ("2 Iliac/2 Rods"); (B) T10 to S1 ("Sacral Only"); (C) unilateral traditional iliac screw ("1 Iliac/2 Rods"); (D) one traditional iliac screw bilaterally with one midline accessory rod ("2 Iliac/3 rods"); (E) S2AI screws connected directly to the midline rods ("2 S2AI/2 Rods"); and two traditional iliac screws bilaterally with two lateral accessory rods connected to the main rods at varying locations (F1: T10-11, F2: T11-12, F3: T12-L1, F4: L1-2) ("4 Iliac/4 Rods"). Range of motions (ROM) at T10-S1 and T9-T10 were recorded and compared between models. The T9-T10 intradiscal pressures and stresses of the T9-10 disc's annulus in addition to the von Mises stresses of the T9 and T10 vertebral bodies were recorded and compared.

Results: For T10-S1 ROM, 4 iliac/4 rods had lowest ROM in flexion and extension, while 2 S2AI/2 rods showed lowest ROM in rotation. Constructs with 3 or 4 rods had lower stresses on the primary rods compared to 2-rod constructs. At the proximal adjacent disc (T9-10), 4 iliac/4 rods showed lowest ROM, lowest intradiscal pressures, and lowest annular stress in all directions (most pronounced in flexion-extension). Under flexion and extension, 4 iliac/4 rods also showed the lowest von Mises stresses on the T10 vertebral body but the highest stresses on the T9 vertebral body.

Conclusions: Dual iliac screws with 4 rods across the lumbosacral junction and extending to the thoracolumbar junction demonstrated the lowest T10-S1 ROM, the lowest adjacent segment disc (T9-T10) ROM, intradiscal pressures, and annular stresses, and the lowest UIV stresses, albeit with the highest UIV + 1 stresses. Additional studies are needed to confirm whether these biomechanical findings dictate clinical outcomes and effect rates of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure.

Purpose: To retrospectively report on the clinical presentation, radiological features, indication, and outcome of surgical management of children with posttubercular spinal deformities with long term outcome.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in a single center operated by a single surgeon from 2002 to 2022, and data from an electronic medical record was reviewed. The indications for surgery included failure of medical treatment, to prevent deformity (depending on location, extent of bone loss, stabilization patterns (A, B, or C), and the presence of "Spine at Risk" signs) or correct deformity and in the presence of major neurodeficit.

Results: 51 children (< 15 years) of mean age 12.5, and mean follow-up of 7 years (2-15) were included. Pain, deformity/instability, and limb weakness were seen in 34 (66.6%) patients (mean mJOA score was 13.44, which improved to 14.7 and 16.8 at immediate postoperative and latest follow-up), with 17 (33.3%) patients presenting with deformity alone. Dorsal affection was commonest (60.8%), followed by lumbosacral (19.6%) and cervical (19.6%), with multilevel/skip lesions seen in four patients. The mean coronal/sagittal Cobb at presentation was 24.2°/40.96°, which improved to 8.2°/25.6° in the immediate and 8.8°/24.8° at the latest follow-up. Gene Xpert positivity was found in 95%, AFB culture positivity in 84%, and histopathology was positive in 91%. All patients had posterior surgery with an additional anterior reconstruction in 6. The complication rate was 5.8% (N = 3); 2 had implant loosening requiring revision surgery, 1 with prolonged discharging sinus with MDR TB, healed with chemotherapy.

Conclusion: Pediatric post-tuberculous spinal deformities require identification of those who are likely to worsen, and close follow-up is mandatory. Failure of medical management, major destruction of vertebral bodies, type C stabilization pattern, and worsening deformity/neurodeficit require surgery with a good outcome.

Purpose: To assess and compare coronal alignment correction at 2 year follow-up in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients treated with and without the kickstand rod (KSR) construct.

Methods: ASD patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion at a single-center with a preoperative coronal vertical axis (CVA) ≥ 3 cm and a minimum of 2 year clinical and radiographic follow-up were identified. Patients were divided into two groups: those treated with a KSR and those who were not. Patients were propensity score-matched (PSM) controlling for preoperative CVA and instrumented levels to limit potential biases that my influence the magnitude of coronal correction.

Results: One hundred sixteen patients were identified (KSR = 42, Control = 74). There were no statistically significant differences in patient characteristics (p > 0.05). At baseline, the control group presented with a greater LS curve (29.0 ± 19.6 vs. 21.5 ± 10.8, p = 0.0191) while the KSR group presented with a greater CVA (6.3 ± 3.6 vs. 4.5 ± 1.8, p = 0.0036). After 40 PSM pairs were generated, there were no statistically significant differences in baseline patient and radiographic characteristics. Within the matched cohorts, the KSR group demonstrated greater CVA correction at 1 year (4.7 ± 2.4 cm vs. 2.9 ± 2.2 cm, p = 0.0012) and 2 year follow-up (4.7 ± 2.6 cm vs. 3.1 ± 2.6 cm, p = 0.0020) resulting in less coronal malalignment one (1.5 ± 1.3 cm vs. 2.4 ± 1.6 cm, p = 0.0056) and 2 year follow-up (1.6 ± 1.0 vs. 2.5 ± 1.5 cm, p = 0.0110). No statistically significant differences in PROMs, asymptomatic mechanical complications, reoperations for non-mechanical complications were observed at 2 year follow-up. However, the KSR group experienced a lesser rate of mechanical complications requiring reoperations (7.1% vs. 24.3%. OR = 0.15 [0.03-0.72], p = 0.0174).

Conclusions: Patients treated with a KSR had a greater amount of coronal realignment at the 2 year follow-up time period and reported less mechanical complications requiring reoperation. However, 2 year patient-reported outcomes were similar between the two groups.

Spinal scoliosis, a prevalent spinal deformity impacting both physical and mental well-being, has a significant genetic component, though the exact pathogenic mechanisms remain elusive. This review offers a comprehensive exploration of current research on embryonic spinal development, focusing on the genetic and biological intricacies governing axial elongation and straightening. Zebrafish, a vital model in developmental biology, takes a prominent role in understanding spinal scoliosis. Insights from zebrafish studies illustrate genetic and physiological aspects, including notochord development and cerebrospinal fluid dynamics, revealing the anomalies contributing to scoliosis. In this review, we acknowledge existing challenges, such as deciphering the unique dynamics of human spinal development, variations in physiological curvature, and disparities in cerebrospinal fluid circulation. Further, we emphasize the need for caution when extrapolating findings to humans and for future research to bridge current knowledge gaps. We hope that this review will be a beneficial frame of reference for the guidance of future studies on animal models and genetic research for spinal scoliosis.

Purpose: Our purpose was to determine associations between body mass index (BMI) category and outcomes of vertebral body tethering (VBT), a non-fusion treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and juvenile idiopathic scoliosis (JIS).

Methods: Using a multicenter database, we identified patients with AIS or JIS who underwent VBT from 2012 to 2018 and had minimum 2-year follow-up (median, 3.0 [interquartile range 2.2, 3.8]). BMI percentiles were used to classify patients as overweight (≥ 85th percentile) or non-overweight (< 85th percentile). Univariate and multivariate regressions assessed associations between complication rates and curve correction between groups, controlling for sex, triradiate cartilage closure, and preoperative curve magnitude.

Results: Of 271 patients, 48 (18%) were overweight. Complication rates did not differ between groups. Factors associated with less correction from preoperative to first postoperative-erect imaging were overweight (β = - 10, p < 0.001), male sex (β = - 8.8 p < 0.01), closed triradiate cartilage (β = 6.0, p = 0.01), and smaller preoperative curve (β = 0.3, p < 0.01). Factors associated with a larger curve at latest follow-up were overweight (β = 4.0, p = 0.02) and larger preoperative curve (β = 0.5, p < 0.001), but tether breakage did not differ between groups (p = 0.31).

Conclusion: In patients who were overweight, VBT was associated with less curve correction at first erect imaging and larger final curve. However, complications and curve correction during the modulation phase were not different from those of non-overweight patients. These findings suggest that surgeons should expect less correction with VBT in patients who are overweight but similar correction over time.

Level of evidence: Prognostic, Level III.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare postoperative outcomes between selective and non-selective fusions longitudinally over the first five postoperative years.

Methods: Patient parameters were retrieved from a multicenter, prospective, database. Patients with Lenke 1-6, B and C deformities were included. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: selective fusion (SF), if the last instrumented vertebra (LIV) was at or cranial to the lumbar apex, or non-selective fusion (NSF). Differences in coronal and sagittal radiographic outcomes were assessed with generalized linear models (GLMs) at 1-, 2- and 5- year postoperative outcomes. Five-year postoperative categorical radiographic outcomes, flexibility, scoliosis research society scores (SRS), and reoperation rates were compared between groups. Matched cohorts were created for subgroup analysis.

Results: 416 (SF:261, NF:155) patients, including 353 females were included in this study. The mean preoperative thoracic and lumbar Cobb angles were 57.3 ± 8.9 and 45.3 ± 8.0, respectively. GLMs demonstrated greater postoperative coronal deformity in the SF group (p < 0.01); however, the difference between groups did not change overtime (p > 0.05) indicating a relatively stable postoperative deformity correction. The SF group had a greater incidence of lumbar Cobb ≥ 26 degrees (p < 0.01). The NSF group demonstrated worse forward and lateral flexibility at 5-year postoperative outcome (p < 0.05). There was no difference in postoperative SRS scores between the SF and NSF groups. Reoperation rates were similar between groups.

Conclusion: Selective fusion results in greater coronal plane deformity; however, this deformity does not progress significantly over time compared to non-selective fusion. Selective spinal fusion may be a beneficial option for a larger subset of patients than previously identified.

Level of evidence: III.

Purpose: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a common spinal deformity with varying progression, complicating treatment decisions. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly prominent in orthopedic care, aiding in diagnosis, risk-stratification, and treatment guidance. This scoping review outlines AI applications in AIS.

Methods: This study followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines and included articles that reported the development, use, or validation of AI models for treating, diagnosing, or predicting clinical outcomes in AIS.

Results: 40 full-text articles were included, with most studies published in the last 5 years (77.5%). Common ML techniques were convolutional neural networks (55%), decision trees and random forests (15%), and artificial neural networks (15%). Most AI applications in AIS were for imaging analysis (25/40; 62.5%), focusing on automatic measurement of Cobb angle, and axial vertebral rotation (13/25; 52%) and curve classification/severity (13/25; 52%). Prediction was the second most common application (15/40; 37.5%), with studies predicting curve progression (9/15; 60%), and Cobb angles (9/15; 60%). Only 15 studies (37.5%) reported clinical implementation guidelines for AI in AIS management. 52.5% of studies reported model accuracy, with an average of 85.4%.

Conclusion: This review highlights the applications of AI in AIS care, notably including automatic radiographic analysis, curve type classification, prediction of curve progression, and AIS diagnosis. However, the current lack of clear clinical implementation guidelines, model transparency, and external validation of studied models limits clinician trust and the generalizability and applicability of AI in AIS management.

Purpose: The management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) curves between 40 and 50° is controversial. Here, we investigated the prognostic significance of simple radiographic rotational parameters to identify curves of this magnitude with accelerated deterioration following skeletal maturity.

Methods: Seventy-three patients were identified with AIS and Cobb angles of the major curve between 40 and 50° at skeletal maturity. We defined fast progressive curves as those increasing by ≥ 2° per year after skeletal maturity. From the apical vertebra of the major curve upon presentation and skeletal maturity, we determined the modified Nash-Moe index (×100), and from thoracic major curves, the Rib Index. T tests were performed to compare fast-progressive curves with those that deteriorated by < 2° per year. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to establish optimal cutoffs, sensitivity, and specificity measures for rotational parameters.

Results: The average duration of follow-up post was 11.8 ± 7.3 years. Thirteen out of seventy-three patients were fast progressors. The modified Nash-Moe index was similar between groups at presentation (p = 0.477) but significantly higher in fast progressors than non-fast progressors at maturity for major thoracic curves (25.40 ± 6.60 vs. 19.20 ± 4.40, p < 0.001). Rib Index values were also higher among fast progressors at skeletal maturity (2.50 ± 0.90 vs. 1.80 ± 0.60, p = 0.026). An ROC curve for a modified Nash-Moe index of 0.235 for thoracic curves achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.76 for discriminating fast progressors. A threshold of 1.915 for Rib Index at maturity achieved an AUC of 0.72 for discriminating fast progressors. In combining both rotational parameters, an AUC of 0.81 was achieved.

Conclusion: These simple rotational parameters may be useful to predict fast progression in 40-50° AIS curves following skeletal maturity indicated for early fusion, but further validation upon larger cohorts and non-thoracic major curves is required.

Purpose: The goal of this study is to characterize the self-reported prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities among patients with adolescent scoliosis.

Methods: Eligible patients across the US were surveyed using ResearchMatch, a validated online platform. The survey collected patient demographics, type of scoliosis, scoliosis treatment received, and the mental health diagnoses and interventions.

Results: Nearly all (98%) of the 162 respondents were patients themselves, the remainder of which were parents. The majority of whom were female (93%), Caucasian (85%), and diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis (63%). The median age of diagnosis was 13 (IQR 11-18). Most respondents had mild to moderate scoliosis (65%), and 17% received surgical treatment. 76 of 158 (48%) responded that scoliosis affected their overall mental health, and 92 (58%) had received a mental health diagnosis-76% were diagnosed after their scoliosis diagnosis. Of the 92 with mental health diagnoses, the most common diagnoses were clinical depression (83%), anxiety (71%), negative body image (62%). Over 80% of patients received medical treatment or therapy. Of those with depression, 38.4% received counseling and 45.2% received medication. 52% of the respondents also had immediate family members with mental health diagnoses, with siblings (48%) having the highest proportion.

Conclusion: According to the CDC, the prevalence of US teenagers with diagnosed depression was found to be 3.9% and anxiety disorder to be 4.7%, notably higher among adolescent girls. In this national sample, over half of adolescent scoliosis patients report psychiatric comorbidity, often diagnosed years later. The most prevalent psychiatric condition is depression, anxiety, and body-image disturbances. These findings highlight the importance of awareness of the psychiatric impact of adolescent scoliosis, and importance of screening and treatment of comorbid mental health conditions.

Level of evidence: IV.