Pub Date : 2025-04-28DOI: 10.1007/s11187-025-01051-0
Alpaslan Akay, Levent Yilmaz
This paper investigates whether individuals’ relative (status or positional) concerns are associated with their transitions from paid employment or inactivity to self-employment. The conjecture is that stress and anxiety arising from socio-economic comparisons may be motivating factors for individuals to establish their own businesses. We examine this using the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) dataset, a long panel spanning three decades. Employing fixed-effects panel model specifications, we find that an increase in the income and job prestige of comparable others is associated with a higher probability of transitioning from paid employment or inactivity to self-employment. On average, a 10% rise in the income or job prestige of comparable others corresponds to a 7–10% higher likelihood of transitioning to self-employment. These findings are robust across various checks, including estimators, income definitions, and reference groups. The paper also explores catalysing factors such as risk-taking, skills, and autonomy, which moderate the relationship between relative concerns and the transition to self-employment.
{"title":"“Status” concerns and self-employment transitions","authors":"Alpaslan Akay, Levent Yilmaz","doi":"10.1007/s11187-025-01051-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-025-01051-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper investigates whether individuals’ relative (status or positional) concerns are associated with their transitions from paid employment or inactivity to self-employment. The conjecture is that stress and anxiety arising from socio-economic comparisons may be motivating factors for individuals to establish their own businesses. We examine this using the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) dataset, a long panel spanning three decades. Employing fixed-effects panel model specifications, we find that an increase in the income and job prestige of comparable others is associated with a higher probability of transitioning from paid employment or inactivity to self-employment. On average, a 10% rise in the income or job prestige of comparable others corresponds to a 7–10% higher likelihood of transitioning to self-employment. These findings are robust across various checks, including estimators, income definitions, and reference groups. The paper also explores catalysing factors such as risk-taking, skills, and autonomy, which moderate the relationship between relative concerns and the transition to self-employment.</p>","PeriodicalId":21803,"journal":{"name":"Small Business Economics","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143880538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-21DOI: 10.1007/s11187-025-01039-w
Aaron Defort, Michael Fröhlich, Paul Neuroth, Isabell Welpe
This paper investigates the impact of different types of successful start-up exits on the development of entrepreneurial ecosystems (EEs). With a panel data analysis covering 45 European cities over 20 years, the study examines how acquisitions and IPOs influence subsequent individual investment activity and new venture creation. The results reveal that acquisitions significantly and positively influence investment activity and new venture creation in the following years. In contrast, IPOs show smaller and marginally significant effects. These findings provide nuanced insights into how entrepreneurial recycling occurs within EEs after exit events, contributing to our understanding of the evolutionary nature of entrepreneurial ecosystems. The study underscores the importance of exit routes and the legitimacy of ecosystem actors in fostering entrepreneurship and regional development.
{"title":"How do successful exits impact regional development? Longitudinal evidence from European cities","authors":"Aaron Defort, Michael Fröhlich, Paul Neuroth, Isabell Welpe","doi":"10.1007/s11187-025-01039-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-025-01039-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper investigates the impact of different types of successful start-up exits on the development of entrepreneurial ecosystems (EEs). With a panel data analysis covering 45 European cities over 20 years, the study examines how acquisitions and IPOs influence subsequent individual investment activity and new venture creation. The results reveal that acquisitions significantly and positively influence investment activity and new venture creation in the following years. In contrast, IPOs show smaller and marginally significant effects. These findings provide nuanced insights into how entrepreneurial recycling occurs within EEs after exit events, contributing to our understanding of the evolutionary nature of entrepreneurial ecosystems. The study underscores the importance of exit routes and the legitimacy of ecosystem actors in fostering entrepreneurship and regional development.</p>","PeriodicalId":21803,"journal":{"name":"Small Business Economics","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143853396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-16DOI: 10.1007/s11187-025-01031-4
Matteo Spinazzola, Veronica Scuotto, Marco Pironti, Manlio Del Giudice
Entrepreneurial ecosystems (EEs) are regarded as ideal breeding ground for knowledge-intensive entrepreneurs (KIEs). Yet, as EEs are mostly considered isolated from each other and their connectedness is neglected, there is a lack of research on their capacity to attract KIEs rather than to locally nurturing them. Inadequate data has been a major obstacle to this line of work as well. Aiming to address this gap, the present study investigates KIEs’ mobility providing empirical evidence at support of EEs’ connectedness. The career history of 3,897 biotech KIEs across 32 European countries over a 15-year time was analysed. A stochastic actor-oriented model (SAOM) was employed to identify the key determinants attracting flows of biotech KIEs from one EE to another. Crucially, this analysis included both location-specific variables for every EE, as well as the dynamics of the inter-EE mobility network itself. Though the results are specific to KIEs in the biotech sector and more research is necessary to further confirm them, they provide evidence that KIEs’ mobility emerges from multiscalar phenomena extending beyond ecosystem boundaries. Both the academic community and policymakers should take such dynamics seriously to understand and shape EEs connectedness to the larger world. Moreover, as KIEs’ mobility cannot be fully understood without accounting for inter-EE connectedness, the multiscalar understanding of EEs can significantly benefit from the use of KIEs’ mobility data.
{"title":"Connectedness of entrepreneurial ecosystems: evidence from the mobility of knowledge-intensive entrepreneurs","authors":"Matteo Spinazzola, Veronica Scuotto, Marco Pironti, Manlio Del Giudice","doi":"10.1007/s11187-025-01031-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-025-01031-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Entrepreneurial ecosystems (EEs) are regarded as ideal breeding ground for knowledge-intensive entrepreneurs (KIEs). Yet, as EEs are mostly considered isolated from each other and their connectedness is neglected, there is a lack of research on their capacity to attract KIEs rather than to locally nurturing them. Inadequate data has been a major obstacle to this line of work as well. Aiming to address this gap, the present study investigates KIEs’ mobility providing empirical evidence at support of EEs’ connectedness. The career history of 3,897 biotech KIEs across 32 European countries over a 15-year time was analysed. A stochastic actor-oriented model (SAOM) was employed to identify the key determinants attracting flows of biotech KIEs from one EE to another. Crucially, this analysis included both location-specific variables for every EE, as well as the dynamics of the inter-EE mobility network itself. Though the results are specific to KIEs in the biotech sector and more research is necessary to further confirm them, they provide evidence that KIEs’ mobility emerges from multiscalar phenomena extending beyond ecosystem boundaries. Both the academic community and policymakers should take such dynamics seriously to understand and shape EEs connectedness to the larger world. Moreover, as KIEs’ mobility cannot be fully understood without accounting for inter-EE connectedness, the multiscalar understanding of EEs can significantly benefit from the use of KIEs’ mobility data.</p>","PeriodicalId":21803,"journal":{"name":"Small Business Economics","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143837015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-16DOI: 10.1007/s11187-025-01043-0
Syed Ali Adnan Rizvi, Giulio Buciuni, Paul Ryan
Incumbent large businesses play a crucial role in fostering resilient entrepreneurial ecosystems. However, many regions lack the presence of such firms. Early research suggests that an entrepreneurial ecosystem can compensate for this absence through positive spillovers from foreign direct investment. While the role of multinational enterprises in entrepreneurial ecosystems remains underexplored, our comprehensive review of the broader business and economics literature delineates and describes six key multinational enterprise spillover mechanisms that impact entrepreneurial ecosystem genesis and evolution. We contribute a theoretical model of six multinational enterprise spillover mechanisms’ impact on entrepreneurial ecosystem evolution from genesis, through growth, and on to maturation as a more resilient entrepreneurial ecosystem. We ultimately propose a future research agenda to further and more deeply explore the impact of multinational enterprises’ spillovers on entrepreneurial ecosystems.
{"title":"Multinational enterprise spillover mechanisms in the genesis and evolution of entrepreneurial ecosystems","authors":"Syed Ali Adnan Rizvi, Giulio Buciuni, Paul Ryan","doi":"10.1007/s11187-025-01043-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-025-01043-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Incumbent large businesses play a crucial role in fostering resilient entrepreneurial ecosystems. However, many regions lack the presence of such firms. Early research suggests that an entrepreneurial ecosystem can compensate for this absence through positive spillovers from foreign direct investment. While the role of multinational enterprises in entrepreneurial ecosystems remains underexplored, our comprehensive review of the broader business and economics literature delineates and describes six key multinational enterprise spillover mechanisms that impact entrepreneurial ecosystem genesis and evolution. We contribute a theoretical model of six multinational enterprise spillover mechanisms’ impact on entrepreneurial ecosystem evolution from genesis, through growth, and on to maturation as a more resilient entrepreneurial ecosystem. We ultimately propose a future research agenda to further and more deeply explore the impact of multinational enterprises’ spillovers on entrepreneurial ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":21803,"journal":{"name":"Small Business Economics","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143837016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-11DOI: 10.1007/s11187-025-01024-3
Agata Kapturkiewicz
Abstract
This paper contributes to a better understanding of how place matters for the development of nascent Information and Communication Technology (ICT) entrepreneurial ecosystems (EEs). This qualitative study adopts a lens of neo-institutional theory, looking at EEs as organisational fields, and focuses on two comparative cases in Japan—Osaka-Kyoto and Fukuoka, which are developing “in the shadow” of the more established Tokyo EE. The data is based on semi-structured interviews and participant observations generated during fieldwork research in 2016–2020, analysed together with a set of archival data. The findings reveal similar gaps in the institutional infrastructure of the nascent EEs of Osaka-Kyoto and Fukuoka (for example, in funding, in the access to information and expertise from successful startups), in response to which their stakeholders engage undertake similar types of actions to obtain the missing/underdeveloped elements, including creating network connections within and between EEs (with particularly important links to Tokyo EE). However, the study shows that the existing and expected outcomes of these actions are moderated by certain elements underlying the EEs’ institutional infrastructure—local resources (stronger in Osaka-Kyoto) and place cohesion (stronger in Fukuoka). The latter concept is newly identified and defined in the paper. The findings of this paper become the basis for a process model of the nascent EEs’ development, have theoretical implications for research about EEs and for the comparative study of organisational fields, and offer insights for policy and practice.