Pub Date : 2026-01-26DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.053822
Brian Stamm, Joseph F Carrera
{"title":"Guidelines in Action: Getting to the (Large) Core of the (T)Issue.","authors":"Brian Stamm, Joseph F Carrera","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.053822","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.053822","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146046926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-26DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.053825
Andrew Osborne, Eno Inikori, Alexis N Simpkins
{"title":"Guidelines in Action: Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Nondisabling Stroke Within the 4.5-Hour Window.","authors":"Andrew Osborne, Eno Inikori, Alexis N Simpkins","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.053825","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.053825","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146046946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-26DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.053830
Daniel Gonzalez, Supreet Kaur
{"title":"Guidelines in Action: Flight of the Mobile Stroke Unit.","authors":"Daniel Gonzalez, Supreet Kaur","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.053830","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.053830","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146046961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-26DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.053824
Jing Wang, Pouya Tahsili-Fahadan
{"title":"Guideline in Action: General Supportive Early Management: Blood Pressure and Glucose.","authors":"Jing Wang, Pouya Tahsili-Fahadan","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.053824","DOIUrl":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.053824","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12841914/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146046954","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-26DOI: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000513
Shyam Prabhakaran, Nestor R Gonzalez, Kori S Zachrison, Opeolu Adeoye, Anne W Alexandrov, Sameer A Ansari, Sherita Chapman, Alexandra L Czap, Oana M Dumitrascu, Koto Ishida, Ashutosh P Jadhav, Brenda Johnson, Karen C Johnston, Pooja Khatri, W Taylor Kimberly, Vivien H Lee, Thabele M Leslie-Mazwi, Brian Mac Grory, Tracy E Madsen, Bijoy Menon, Eva A Mistry, Soojin Park, Stephanie Parker, Natalia Pérez de la Ossa, Mathew Reeves, Tania Saiz, Phillip A Scott, Dana Schwartzberg, Sunil A Sheth, Peter B Sporns, Sabrina Times, Stavropoula Tjoumakaris, Stacey Q Wolfe, Shadi Yaghi
Aim: The "2026 Guideline for the Early Management of Patients With AIS" replaces the "2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With AIS" and the 2019 update to reflect recent advances in evidence. This updated guideline is intended to provide a comprehensive, up-to-date, evidence-based set of recommendations, advising management from prehospital evaluation through acute treatment and early in-hospital management of complications and initiation of early secondary prevention measures. The intended audience includes prehospital care professionals, physicians, allied health professionals, and hospital administrators.
Methods: A search for literature derived from research principally involving human subjects, published in English since the last AIS guideline in 2018 and the 2019 update, and indexed in MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline, was conducted between September and December 2024. Additional high impact studies and articles published through March 2025 were added later, where appropriate.
Structure: This guideline represents the most current and comprehensive evidence available in AIS care. Key updates include the incorporation of new evidence related to thrombolytic choice and eligibility, determination of eligibility for endovascular thrombectomy, and management of hyperglycemia and dysphagia; a focused consideration of the pediatric population; and modification of the approach to thrombolysis contraindications. Although this guideline reflects significant advances, it also highlights gaps in knowledge and underscores the urgent need for continued research to further refine and improve treatment strategies.
{"title":"2026 Guideline for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.","authors":"Shyam Prabhakaran, Nestor R Gonzalez, Kori S Zachrison, Opeolu Adeoye, Anne W Alexandrov, Sameer A Ansari, Sherita Chapman, Alexandra L Czap, Oana M Dumitrascu, Koto Ishida, Ashutosh P Jadhav, Brenda Johnson, Karen C Johnston, Pooja Khatri, W Taylor Kimberly, Vivien H Lee, Thabele M Leslie-Mazwi, Brian Mac Grory, Tracy E Madsen, Bijoy Menon, Eva A Mistry, Soojin Park, Stephanie Parker, Natalia Pérez de la Ossa, Mathew Reeves, Tania Saiz, Phillip A Scott, Dana Schwartzberg, Sunil A Sheth, Peter B Sporns, Sabrina Times, Stavropoula Tjoumakaris, Stacey Q Wolfe, Shadi Yaghi","doi":"10.1161/STR.0000000000000513","DOIUrl":"10.1161/STR.0000000000000513","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The \"2026 Guideline for the Early Management of Patients With AIS\" replaces the \"2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With AIS\" and the 2019 update to reflect recent advances in evidence. This updated guideline is intended to provide a comprehensive, up-to-date, evidence-based set of recommendations, advising management from prehospital evaluation through acute treatment and early in-hospital management of complications and initiation of early secondary prevention measures. The intended audience includes prehospital care professionals, physicians, allied health professionals, and hospital administrators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search for literature derived from research principally involving human subjects, published in English since the last AIS guideline in 2018 and the 2019 update, and indexed in MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline, was conducted between September and December 2024. Additional high impact studies and articles published through March 2025 were added later, where appropriate.</p><p><strong>Structure: </strong>This guideline represents the most current and comprehensive evidence available in AIS care. Key updates include the incorporation of new evidence related to thrombolytic choice and eligibility, determination of eligibility for endovascular thrombectomy, and management of hyperglycemia and dysphagia; a focused consideration of the pediatric population; and modification of the approach to thrombolysis contraindications. Although this guideline reflects significant advances, it also highlights gaps in knowledge and underscores the urgent need for continued research to further refine and improve treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146046948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Intermittent hypoxia (IH) preconditioning enhances brain resilience, thereby protecting against subsequent ischemic injury, yet its precise mechanisms remain elusive. We tested the novel hypothesis that peripheral paracrine mechanisms mediate IH-induced neuroprotection.
Methods: A total of 492 C57BL/6J mice were used: 434 young males (2-3 months), 29 young females (2-3 months), and 29 aged males (18 months). A 2-week IH regimen (13% O2, 5-minute intervals, 10 cycles/d) was applied to generate IH-derived plasma (IHP). To test the hypothesis, IHP or normoxic plasma (100 μL/injection) was intravenously administered every 3 days (6 doses total) before distal middle cerebral artery occlusion. For therapeutic evaluation, plasma was administered daily for 3 days after distal middle cerebral artery occlusion or 60-minute transient MCAO, followed by additional doses every 3 days for 6 doses in long-term transient MCAO studies. Infarct volume and neurological deficits were primary outcomes. Candidate circulating mediators were identified via proteomics and validated by antibody-mediated depletion and recombinant protein supplementation. Blood-brain barrier integrity was further examined.
Results: Systemic IHP administration protected against acute brain injury after distal middle cerebral artery occlusion, reducing infarct volume and improving sensorimotor performance. Poststroke administration of IHP conferred acute and sustained neuroprotection in transient MCAO, but not distal middle cerebral artery occlusion, improving sensorimotor and cognitive recovery and reducing brain atrophy up to 4 weeks after stroke. Proteomic profiling identified 120 IH-upregulated plasma proteins, notably PF4 (platelet factor 4), a cytokine with potent neuroprotective properties. PF4 immunodepletion abolished IHP-induced neuroprotection, whereas recombinant PF4 replicated these benefits across sex and age. Furthermore, PF4 treatment protected against blood-brain barrier disruption after tMCAO, attenuating IgG extravasation and loss of endothelial expression of zonula occludens-1.
Conclusions: These findings identify PF4 as a key paracrine mediator of IH-induced neuroprotection and support the therapeutic potential of both IHP and PF4-based interventions for ischemic stroke.
{"title":"Intermittent Hypoxia Preconditioning Protects Against Ischemic Brain Injury in Mice via a PF4-Dependent Paracrine Mechanism.","authors":"Yingxia Liu, Yakun Gu, Feiyang Jin, Mengyuan Guo, Zhengming Tian, Yuning Li, Qianqian Shao, Mingxuan Cao, Zirui Xu, Jia Liu, Xunming Ji","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.052213","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.052213","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intermittent hypoxia (IH) preconditioning enhances brain resilience, thereby protecting against subsequent ischemic injury, yet its precise mechanisms remain elusive. We tested the novel hypothesis that peripheral paracrine mechanisms mediate IH-induced neuroprotection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 492 C57BL/6J mice were used: 434 young males (2-3 months), 29 young females (2-3 months), and 29 aged males (18 months). A 2-week IH regimen (13% O<sub>2</sub>, 5-minute intervals, 10 cycles/d) was applied to generate IH-derived plasma (IHP). To test the hypothesis, IHP or normoxic plasma (100 μL/injection) was intravenously administered every 3 days (6 doses total) before distal middle cerebral artery occlusion. For therapeutic evaluation, plasma was administered daily for 3 days after distal middle cerebral artery occlusion or 60-minute transient MCAO, followed by additional doses every 3 days for 6 doses in long-term transient MCAO studies. Infarct volume and neurological deficits were primary outcomes. Candidate circulating mediators were identified via proteomics and validated by antibody-mediated depletion and recombinant protein supplementation. Blood-brain barrier integrity was further examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Systemic IHP administration protected against acute brain injury after distal middle cerebral artery occlusion, reducing infarct volume and improving sensorimotor performance. Poststroke administration of IHP conferred acute and sustained neuroprotection in transient MCAO, but not distal middle cerebral artery occlusion, improving sensorimotor and cognitive recovery and reducing brain atrophy up to 4 weeks after stroke. Proteomic profiling identified 120 IH-upregulated plasma proteins, notably PF4 (platelet factor 4), a cytokine with potent neuroprotective properties. PF4 immunodepletion abolished IHP-induced neuroprotection, whereas recombinant PF4 replicated these benefits across sex and age. Furthermore, PF4 treatment protected against blood-brain barrier disruption after tMCAO, attenuating IgG extravasation and loss of endothelial expression of zonula occludens-1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings identify PF4 as a key paracrine mediator of IH-induced neuroprotection and support the therapeutic potential of both IHP and PF4-based interventions for ischemic stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146019787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.051628
Jennifer E S Beauchamp, Remle Crowe, Stephanie Mohl, Hugo J Aparicio, Mary Dunn, Marco A Gonzalez, Dawn Kleindorfer, Enrique C Leira, Lynda Lisabeth, Yolanda Reyes-Iglesias, Eduardo Sanchez, José Biller
Background: Stroke burden and structural inequities in stroke education among US Spanish-speaking Hispanic and Latino (SSHL) adults suggest a need for culturally appropriate education. Existing Spanish stroke recognition acronyms need to be evaluated among SSHL adults.
Methods: A 3-phase exploratory sequential design was used. To inform design of AHORA (Andar [Walk] or Alzar [Raise], Hablar [Talk], Ojos [Eyes], Rostro [Face], Ambos Brazos [Both Arms] or Activar [Activate]), PARA Stroke (Palabras [Words], Alzar [Raise], Rostro [Face], Avisar [Warn]), and RÁPIDO (Rostro Caído [Face Drooping], Alteración Del Equilibrio [Loss of Balance], Pérdida de Fuerza en el Brazo o Una Pierna [Loss of Strength in an Arm or Leg], Impedimento Visual [Visual Impairment], Dificultad PARA Stroke Hablar [Difficulty Speaking], Obtén Ayuda [Get Help]) before a randomized, parallel, 4-group prepost efficacy study involving 1105 SSHL participants (phase 3), interviews with health care professionals (n=15; phase 1) in May-June 2022 and focus groups with SSHL individuals (n=24; phase 2) were conducted in June-July 2022. Participants viewed a 1-minute video that included AHORA, PARA Stroke, RÁPIDO, or usual care (education without an acronym). Stroke knowledge and intent to contact 9-1-1 were examined pre- and 30 days post-video exposure via online questionnaires. Ordinal regression analyses were completed to determine acronym performances in improving stroke recognition, and binomial regression analyses were completed to determine increasing intention to call 9-1-1. Post hoc repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine if any acronym led to the greatest increase in intention to call 9-1-1.
Results: At 30 days post-video (n=367), odds of recognizing more stroke signs compared with usual care were given as follows: odds ratio, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.45-1.69; P=0.69), odds ratio, 0.54 (95% CI, 0.28-1.00; P=0.05), and odds ratio, 1.47 (95% CI, 0.73-2.99; P=0.28), and odds of increased intent to call 9-1-1 were given as follows: 1.18 (95% CI, 0.59-2.37; P=0.64), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.49-1.80; P=0.76), and 1.06 (95% CI, 0.54-2.06; P=0.84) for AHORA, PARA Stroke, and RÁPIDO, respectively. The acronyms had significant long-term positive effects on the intent to call 9-1-1 (F[1101]=251.457; P<0.001; MSE=41.321) although no significant differences were observed between the acronyms.
Conclusions: AHORA, PARA Stroke, and RÁPIDO performed comparably to usual care. Healthcare professionals and SSHL consumers preferred a Spanish-language acronym, specifically RÁPIDO and PARA Stroke, compared with an acronym translated verbatim from English to Spanish.
背景:在美国讲西班牙语的西班牙裔和拉丁裔(SSHL)成年人中,卒中负担和卒中教育的结构性不平等表明需要进行文化上适当的教育。现有的西班牙语卒中识别缩略语需要在SSHL成人中进行评估。方法:采用3期探索性序贯设计。为AHORA (Andar [Walk]或Alzar [Raise], Hablar [Talk], Ojos [Eyes], Rostro [Face], Ambos Brazos [Both Arms]或Activar [Activate]), PARA Stroke (Palabras [Words], Alzar [Raise], Rostro [Face], Avisar [Warn])和RÁPIDO (Rostro Caído [Face down], Alteración Del Equilibrio[失去平衡],prdida de Fuerza en el Brazo o Una Pierna[手臂或腿部失去力量],视觉障碍[视力障碍],困难的PARA Stroke Hablar[说话困难]的设计提供信息,在一项涉及1105名SSHL参与者(第3期)的随机、平行、4组疗效前研究之前(2022年5月至6月),对卫生保健专业人员进行访谈(n=15,第1期),并在2022年6月至7月对SSHL个体进行焦点小组访谈(n=24,第2期)。参与者观看了一段1分钟的视频,内容包括AHORA、PARA中风、RÁPIDO或常规护理(没有缩写词的教育)。研究人员通过在线问卷调查了受试者接触视频前和视频后30天的中风知识和联系9-1-1的意愿。通过有序回归分析确定首字母缩略词在提高卒中识别方面的表现,通过二项回归分析确定拨打9-1-1的意愿增加。事后重复测量方差分析用于确定是否有任何首字母缩略词导致拨打911的意愿最大的增加。结果:在视频后30天(n=367),与常规护理相比,识别更多中风迹象的几率如下:优势比为0.87 (95% CI, 0.45-1.69; P=0.69),优势比为0.54 (95% CI, 0.28-1.00; P=0.05),优势比为1.47 (95% CI, 0.73-2.99; P=0.28), AHORA、PARA卒中和RÁPIDO的倾向增加的几率分别为1.18 (95% CI, 0.59-2.37; P=0.64)、0.95 (95% CI, 0.49-1.80; P=0.76)和1.06 (95% CI, 0.54-2.06; P=0.84)。首字母缩略词对拨打9-1-1的意向有显著的长期积极影响(F[1101]=251.457; p结论:AHORA、PARA卒中和RÁPIDO的效果与常规护理相当。与逐字翻译成西班牙语的首字母缩略词相比,医疗保健专业人员和SSHL消费者更喜欢西班牙语的首字母缩略词,特别是RÁPIDO和PARA Stroke。
{"title":"Stroke Recognition Tools for Spanish-Speaking Consumers: A Nationwide Study.","authors":"Jennifer E S Beauchamp, Remle Crowe, Stephanie Mohl, Hugo J Aparicio, Mary Dunn, Marco A Gonzalez, Dawn Kleindorfer, Enrique C Leira, Lynda Lisabeth, Yolanda Reyes-Iglesias, Eduardo Sanchez, José Biller","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.051628","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.051628","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke burden and structural inequities in stroke education among US Spanish-speaking Hispanic and Latino (SSHL) adults suggest a need for culturally appropriate education. Existing Spanish stroke recognition acronyms need to be evaluated among SSHL adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 3-phase exploratory sequential design was used. To inform design of AHORA (Andar [Walk] or Alzar [Raise], Hablar [Talk], Ojos [Eyes], Rostro [Face], Ambos Brazos [Both Arms] or Activar [Activate]), PARA Stroke (Palabras [Words], Alzar [Raise], Rostro [Face], Avisar [Warn]), and RÁPIDO (Rostro Caído [Face Drooping], Alteración Del Equilibrio [Loss of Balance], Pérdida de Fuerza en el Brazo o Una Pierna [Loss of Strength in an Arm or Leg], Impedimento Visual [Visual Impairment], Dificultad PARA Stroke Hablar [Difficulty Speaking], Obtén Ayuda [Get Help]) before a randomized, parallel, 4-group prepost efficacy study involving 1105 SSHL participants (phase 3), interviews with health care professionals (n=15; phase 1) in May-June 2022 and focus groups with SSHL individuals (n=24; phase 2) were conducted in June-July 2022. Participants viewed a 1-minute video that included AHORA, PARA Stroke, RÁPIDO, or usual care (education without an acronym). Stroke knowledge and intent to contact 9-1-1 were examined pre- and 30 days post-video exposure via online questionnaires. Ordinal regression analyses were completed to determine acronym performances in improving stroke recognition, and binomial regression analyses were completed to determine increasing intention to call 9-1-1. Post hoc repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine if any acronym led to the greatest increase in intention to call 9-1-1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 30 days post-video (n=367), odds of recognizing more stroke signs compared with usual care were given as follows: odds ratio, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.45-1.69; <i>P</i>=0.69), odds ratio, 0.54 (95% CI, 0.28-1.00; <i>P</i>=0.05), and odds ratio, 1.47 (95% CI, 0.73-2.99; <i>P</i>=0.28), and odds of increased intent to call 9-1-1 were given as follows: 1.18 (95% CI, 0.59-2.37; <i>P</i>=0.64), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.49-1.80; <i>P</i>=0.76), and 1.06 (95% CI, 0.54-2.06; <i>P</i>=0.84) for AHORA, PARA Stroke, and RÁPIDO, respectively. The acronyms had significant long-term positive effects on the intent to call 9-1-1 (F[1101]=251.457; <i>P</i><0.001; MSE=41.321) although no significant differences were observed between the acronyms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AHORA, PARA Stroke, and RÁPIDO performed comparably to usual care. Healthcare professionals and SSHL consumers preferred a Spanish-language acronym, specifically RÁPIDO and PARA Stroke, compared with an acronym translated verbatim from English to Spanish.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145967101","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-13DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.052349
Love-Preet Kalra, Sabina Zylyftari, Deepak Bos, Klodiana Meci, Iris Voka, Kristaps Blums, Stephan Barthelmes, Andreas Heilgeist, Hannsjörg Baum, Stephan Meckel, Christian Foerch, Sebastian Luger
Background: Clinical scores indicating large vessel occlusion (LVO) in acute stroke patients could streamline triage of patients with suspected LVO to endovascular centers. GFAP (glial fibrillary acidic protein) is a promising blood biomarker for indicating intracerebral hemorrhage in acute stroke. This study evaluates whether positive LVO score results combined with a prehospital negative GFAP test (thereby excluding intracerebral hemorrhage) could improve the accuracy of LVO detection.
Methods: This retrospective diagnostic accuracy study (DETECT LVO) is based on the prospective DETECT study (2022-2024, tertiary care hospital RKH Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Germany), which evaluated the rapid intracerebral hemorrhage detection in acute stroke, measuring prehospital plasma GFAP levels on a point-of-care platform (i-STAT Alinity Abbott). For DETECT LVO 5, established LVO scores (Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation, Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination, 3-Item Stroke Scale, Emergency Medical Stroke Assessment, Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale) were retrospectively calculated from paramedic protocols. LVOs were diagnosed with CT-angiography as follows: occlusion of the internal carotid artery, middle cerebral artery, and basilar artery. Diagnostic accuracy for LVO detection was determined using the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values.
Results: Three hundred fifty-three patients suspected of acute stroke (ischemic stroke, n=258; intracerebral hemorrhage, n=76; stroke mimics, n=19) with a mean age of 74.6 years were included. One hundred one patients with ischemic stroke suffered from LVO (internal carotid artery=23.8%; middle cerebral artery=64.4%; and basilar artery=11.9%). Integrating GFAP to LVO scores significantly increased area under the curve (95% CI) for LVO detection (Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination, 0.859 [0.818-0.893] to 0.899 [0.862-0.928]; Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation, 0.845 [0.802-0.880] to 0.892 [0.855-0.923]; 3-Item Stroke Scale, 0.788, [0.741-0.829] to 0.865 [0.824-0.898]; Emergency Medical Stroke Assessment, 0.840 [0.796-0.875] to 0.870 [0.830-0.910]; Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale, 0.827 [0.784-0.865] to 0.862 [0.821-0.896]; P<0.001).
Conclusions: Integrating LVO scores combined with GFAP measurements into the prehospital work-up of patients with acute stroke improves diagnostic accuracy for LVO prediction. In the future, this could enable direct transfers of patients with suspected LVO to endovascular centers with reduced misdiagnosis rates. Independent replication in diverse prehospital cohorts is warranted to confirm these findings.
{"title":"Integrating GFAP Testing With Clinical Scores for Prehospital Large Vessel Occlusion Detection in Patients With Acute Stroke (DETECT LVO).","authors":"Love-Preet Kalra, Sabina Zylyftari, Deepak Bos, Klodiana Meci, Iris Voka, Kristaps Blums, Stephan Barthelmes, Andreas Heilgeist, Hannsjörg Baum, Stephan Meckel, Christian Foerch, Sebastian Luger","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.052349","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.052349","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical scores indicating large vessel occlusion (LVO) in acute stroke patients could streamline triage of patients with suspected LVO to endovascular centers. GFAP (glial fibrillary acidic protein) is a promising blood biomarker for indicating intracerebral hemorrhage in acute stroke. This study evaluates whether positive LVO score results combined with a prehospital negative GFAP test (thereby excluding intracerebral hemorrhage) could improve the accuracy of LVO detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective diagnostic accuracy study (DETECT LVO) is based on the prospective DETECT study (2022-2024, tertiary care hospital RKH Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Germany), which evaluated the rapid intracerebral hemorrhage detection in acute stroke, measuring prehospital plasma GFAP levels on a point-of-care platform (i-STAT Alinity Abbott). For DETECT LVO 5, established LVO scores (Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation, Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination, 3-Item Stroke Scale, Emergency Medical Stroke Assessment, Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale) were retrospectively calculated from paramedic protocols. LVOs were diagnosed with CT-angiography as follows: occlusion of the internal carotid artery, middle cerebral artery, and basilar artery. Diagnostic accuracy for LVO detection was determined using the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred fifty-three patients suspected of acute stroke (ischemic stroke, n=258; intracerebral hemorrhage, n=76; stroke mimics, n=19) with a mean age of 74.6 years were included. One hundred one patients with ischemic stroke suffered from LVO (internal carotid artery=23.8%; middle cerebral artery=64.4%; and basilar artery=11.9%). Integrating GFAP to LVO scores significantly increased area under the curve (95% CI) for LVO detection (Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination, 0.859 [0.818-0.893] to 0.899 [0.862-0.928]; Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation, 0.845 [0.802-0.880] to 0.892 [0.855-0.923]; 3-Item Stroke Scale, 0.788, [0.741-0.829] to 0.865 [0.824-0.898]; Emergency Medical Stroke Assessment, 0.840 [0.796-0.875] to 0.870 [0.830-0.910]; Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale, 0.827 [0.784-0.865] to 0.862 [0.821-0.896]; <i>P</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating LVO scores combined with GFAP measurements into the prehospital work-up of patients with acute stroke improves diagnostic accuracy for LVO prediction. In the future, this could enable direct transfers of patients with suspected LVO to endovascular centers with reduced misdiagnosis rates. Independent replication in diverse prehospital cohorts is warranted to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145960256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Lp-PLA2 (lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2) is a sensitive biomarker of vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis. This study evaluated the influence of Lp-PLA2 activity on the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin among patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack carrying CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles.
Methods: The CHANCE-2 trial (Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients With Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events-II) randomized 6412 patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack carrying CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles to receive ticagrelor-aspirin or clopidogrel-aspirin. This subgroup study included patients with available baseline Lp-PLA2 activity measurements, stratified by the median value of 188.4 nmol/min per milliliter. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were stroke recurrence and severe or moderate bleeding events within 90 days. Associations between treatment and outcomes were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for a history of hyperlipidemia.
Results: A total of 5919 patients were included (mean age, 64.4 years; 33.9% female). Among patients with low Lp-PLA2 activity, ticagrelor-aspirin reduced the 90-day risk of recurrent stroke compared with clopidogrel-aspirin (5.4% versus 7.4%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.54-0.97]). In patients with high Lp-PLA2 activity, no significant difference was observed (6.9% versus 8.2%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.65-1.09]). The P value was 0.45 for the treatment × Lp-PLA2 activity interaction effect on stroke recurrence. The risk of bleeding associated with ticagrelor-aspirin did not differ across Lp-PLA2 activity levels.
Conclusions: In patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack carrying CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles, elevated Lp-PLA2 activity did not significantly modify the efficacy or safety of dual antiplatelet therapy. Further research is needed to clarify the potential role of Lp-PLA2 in guiding individualized treatment decisions.
背景:脂蛋白相关磷脂酶A2 (Lp-PLA2)是血管炎症和动脉粥样硬化的敏感生物标志物。本研究评估了Lp-PLA2活性对携带CYP2C19功能丧失等位基因的轻度卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者替格瑞洛-阿司匹林与氯吡格雷-阿司匹林的疗效和安全性的影响。方法:CHANCE-2试验(氯吡格雷在高风险急性非致残性脑血管事件患者中的应用- ii)随机选择6412例携带CYP2C19功能缺失等位基因的轻微卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者接受替格瑞-阿司匹林或氯吡格雷-阿司匹林治疗。该亚组研究纳入了基线Lp-PLA2活性测量的患者,按188.4 nmol/min / ml的中位数分层。主要疗效和安全性指标为90天内卒中复发和重度或中度出血事件。使用多变量Cox比例风险模型评估治疗与结果之间的关系,并对高脂血症史进行调整。结果:共纳入5919例患者,平均年龄64.4岁,女性占33.9%。在低Lp-PLA2活性的患者中,与氯吡格雷-阿司匹林相比,替格瑞-阿司匹林降低了90天卒中复发风险(5.4% vs 7.4%;校正风险比为0.72 [95% CI, 0.54-0.97])。在Lp-PLA2活性高的患者中,没有观察到显著差异(6.9% vs 8.2%;校正风险比为0.84 [95% CI, 0.65-1.09])。治疗× Lp-PLA2活性相互作用对卒中复发的影响P值为0.45。与替格瑞洛-阿司匹林相关的出血风险在Lp-PLA2活性水平之间没有差异。结论:在携带CYP2C19功能缺失等位基因的轻微卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者中,Lp-PLA2活性升高并未显著改变双重抗血小板治疗的有效性或安全性。需要进一步的研究来阐明Lp-PLA2在指导个体化治疗决策中的潜在作用。注册:网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT04078737。
{"title":"Lp-PLA2 Activity and Genotype-Guided Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.","authors":"Jinxi Lin, Hongyu Zhou, Yubo Wang, Aoming Jin, Shangzhi Li, Ling Zhang, Xia Meng, Xuewei Xie, Jing Jing, Yong Jiang, Yilong Wang, Xingquan Zhao, Hao Li, Zixiao Li, Yongjun Wang","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.052954","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.052954","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lp-PLA2 (lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2) is a sensitive biomarker of vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis. This study evaluated the influence of Lp-PLA2 activity on the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin among patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack carrying <i>CYP2C19</i> loss-of-function alleles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CHANCE-2 trial (Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients With Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events-II) randomized 6412 patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack carrying <i>CYP2C19</i> loss-of-function alleles to receive ticagrelor-aspirin or clopidogrel-aspirin. This subgroup study included patients with available baseline Lp-PLA2 activity measurements, stratified by the median value of 188.4 nmol/min per milliliter. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were stroke recurrence and severe or moderate bleeding events within 90 days. Associations between treatment and outcomes were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for a history of hyperlipidemia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5919 patients were included (mean age, 64.4 years; 33.9% female). Among patients with low Lp-PLA2 activity, ticagrelor-aspirin reduced the 90-day risk of recurrent stroke compared with clopidogrel-aspirin (5.4% versus 7.4%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.54-0.97]). In patients with high Lp-PLA2 activity, no significant difference was observed (6.9% versus 8.2%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.65-1.09]). The <i>P</i> value was 0.45 for the treatment × Lp-PLA2 activity interaction effect on stroke recurrence. The risk of bleeding associated with ticagrelor-aspirin did not differ across Lp-PLA2 activity levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with minor stroke or transient ischemic attack carrying <i>CYP2C19</i> loss-of-function alleles, elevated Lp-PLA2 activity did not significantly modify the efficacy or safety of dual antiplatelet therapy. Further research is needed to clarify the potential role of Lp-PLA2 in guiding individualized treatment decisions.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04078737.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145960260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}