Strahlentherapie und Onkologie最新文献

Purpose

To compare a liposomal gel with and without chamomile extract for the prevention of radiation dermatitis in breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.

Methods

This study was a double-blind randomized clinical trial. A total of 100 participants undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer were recruited. The primary outcome was the occurrence of dry desquamation. Cumulative dose of ionizing radiation at the first occurrence of dry desquamation, occurrence of erythema, moist desquamation, global radiation dermatitis, and any signs and symptoms self-reported by participants were secondary outcomes.

Results

Dry desquamation occurred in 6.0% of the participants using chamomile liposomal gel and 12.2% of those using liposomal gel (p = 0.32). The mean cumulative dose of ionizing radiation for the first occurrence of dry desquamation was 45.1 Gy in the chamomile liposomal gel group and 43.7 Gy in the liposomal gel group. There were no differences between the two gels in the occurrence of erythema, dry desquamation, moist desquamation, and radiation dermatitis compared to liposomal gel. There was a lower proportion of reported symptoms in the chamomile liposomal gel group compared to liposomal gel group in the first 3 weeks of radiation, especially for itching (p = 0.05).

Conclusion

No statistically significant differences between the two gels were found in radiation dermatitis occurrence and dose at first occurrence. Comparing to the literature, it seems that both interventions may be effective, which might explain the lack of statistical difference between the groups.

Purpose

To assess the value of glutamate chemical exchange saturation transfer (GluCEST) after whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) as an imaging marker of radiation-induced brain injury (RBI) and to preliminarily show the feasibility of multiparametric MRI-guided organ at risk (OAR) avoidance.

Methods

Rats were divided into two groups: the control (CTRL) group (n = 9) and the RBI group (n = 9). The rats in the RBI group were irradiated with an X‑ray radiator and then subjected to a water maze experiment 4 weeks later. In combination with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), we evaluated the value of GluCEST applied to glutamate changes for RBI and investigated the effect of such changes on glutamatergic neuronal function.

Results

The average GluCEST values were markedly lower in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex. Positive correlations were observed between GluCEST values and regional homogeneity (ReHo) values in both the hippocampus and the cerebral cortex. HPLC showed a positive correlation with GluCEST values in the hippocampus. GluCEST values were positively correlated with spatial memory.

Conclusion

GluCEST MRI provides a visual assessment of glutamate changes in RBI rats for monitoring OAR cognitive toxicity reactions and may be used as a biomarker of OAR avoidance as well as metabolism to facilitate monitoring and intervention in radiation damage that occurs after radiotherapy.

Objective

To understand whether art and technology (mainly conversational agents) may help oncology patients to experience a more humanized journey.

Methods

This narrative review encompasses a comprehensive examination of the existing literature in this field by a multicenter, multidisciplinary, and multiprofessional team aiming to analyze the current developments and potential future directions of using art and technology for patient engagement.

Results

We identified three major themes of patient engagement with art and three major themes of patient engagement with technologies. Two real-case scenarios are reported from our experience to practically envision how findings from the literature can be implemented in different contexts.

Conclusion

Art therapy and technologies can be ancillary supports for healthcare professionals but are not substitutive of their expertise and responsibilities. Such tools may help to convey a more empathetic and uplifting patient journey if properly integrated within clinical practice, whereby the humanistic touch of medicine remains pivotal.

Purpose: To construct a comprehensive model for predicting the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma (GB) using a radiomics method and integrating clinical risk factors, tumor microenvironment (TME), and imaging characteristics.

Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, we included 148 patients (85 males and 63 females; median age 53 years) with isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype GB between January 2016 and April 2022. Patients were randomly divided into the training (n = 104) and test (n = 44) sets. The best feature combination related to GB overall survival (OS) was selected using LASSO Cox regression analyses. Clinical, radiomics, clinical-radiomics, clinical-TME, and clinical-radiomics-TME models were established. The models' concordance index (C-index) was evaluated. The survival curve was drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the prognostic stratification ability of the model was tested.

Results: LASSO Cox analyses were used to screen the factors related to OS in patients with GB, including MGMT (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.642; 95% CI 0.414-0.997; P = 0.046), TERT (HR = 1.755; 95% CI 1.095-2.813; P = 0.019), peritumoral edema (HR = 1.013; 95% CI 0.999-1.027; P = 0.049), tumor purity (TP; HR = 0.982; 95% CI 0.964-1.000; P = 0.054), CD163 + tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs; HR = 1.049; 95% CI 1.021-1.078; P < 0.001), CD68 + TAMs (HR = 1.055; 95% CI 1.018-1.093; P = 0.004), and the six radiomics features. The clinical-radiomics-TME model had the best survival prediction ability, the C‑index was 0.768 (0.717-0.819). The AUC of 1‑, 2‑, and 3‑year OS prediction in the test set was 0.842, 0.844, and 0.795, respectively.

Conclusion: The clinical-radiomics-TME model is the most effective for predicting the survival of patients with GB. Radiomics features, TP, and TAMs play important roles in the prognostic model.

Background: Lung cancer remains a serious medical problem. The trace element selenium seems to be a promising prognostic marker or therapeutic option for cancer patients.

Methods: We enrolled 99 patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC undergoing radiotherapy. The serum selenium level of these patients was determined prior to irradiation (t0), after reaching 20 Gy (t1), and at the end of radiotherapy (t2). Selenium concentrations were measured with total-reflection X‑ray fluorescence (TXRF) spectroscopy. We formed three subgroups according to the change in serum selenium levels across timepoints, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate overall survival (OS). Further subgroups were patients with/without metastatic disease. We used adjusted Cox regression models.

Results: The change in selenium concentration was especially significant between t0 and t1 for the whole study group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.5, p = 0.03) as well as in patients with metastasized NSCLC (HR = 0.3, p = 0.04) after adjustment. The baseline selenium value in patients with non-metastasized NSCLC was associated with overall survival (HR = 0.3, p = 0.04). The change in selenium levels between t0 and t2 was significant in patients with metastatic lung cancer (HR = 0.1, p = 0.03). Patients with increased serum selenium levels during radiotherapy between the start of treatment (t0) and t1 had better OS (HR = 0.46, p = 0.05).

Conclusion: Especially patients with increasing selenium levels during radiotherapy showed an improved overall survival. Thus, serum selenium might be a predictive factor for OS in NSCLC patients. The value of supplementation of the trace element is subject to future research.

Background: 5‑Fluoruracil (5-FU) and its oral prodrug capecitabine are mainstays in combined chemoradiotherapy regimens. They are metabolized by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD). Pathogenic variants of the DPYD gene cause a reduction in DPYD activity, leading to possibly severe toxicities. Therefore, patients receiving 5‑FU-/capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy should be tested for DPYD variants. However, there are limited clinical data on treatment adjustments and tolerability in patients with decreased DPYP activity receiving combined chemoradiotherapy. Therefore, a retrospective analysis of the toxicity profiles of patients with decreased DPYD activity treated at our center was conducted.

Materials and methods: For all patients receiving 5‑FU-/capecitabine-based chemo(radio)therapy at our department, DPYD activity was routinely tested. Genotyping of four DPYD variants (DPYD*2A, DPYD*13, c.2846A > T, and haplotype B3) was conducted according to the recommendation of the German Society for Hematooncology (DGHO) using TaqMan hydrolysis polymerase chain reaction (PCR; QuantStudy 3, Thermo FisherScientific, Darmstadt). DPYD variants and activity score as well as clinical data (tumor entity, treatment protocol, dose adjustments, and toxicity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE]) were assessed and reported.

Results: Of 261 tested patients, 21 exhibited DPYD variants, 18 of whom received chemoradiotherapy. All but one patient was treated for rectal or anal carcinoma. The observed rate of DPYD variants was 8.0%, and heterozygous haplotype B3 was the most common (5.75%). One patient exhibited a homozygous DPYD variant. DPYD activity score was at least 0.5 in heterozygous patients; chemotherapy dose was adjusted accordingly, with an applied dose of 50-75%. CTCAE grade 2 skin toxicity (50%) and grade 3 leukopenia (33.3%) were most common. One patient experienced a transient grade 4 increase in transaminases. All high-grade toxicities were manageable with supportive treatment and transient. No CTCAE grade 5 toxicities related to 5‑FU administration were observed.

Conclusion: With dose reduction in heterozygous patients, toxicity was within the range of patients without DPYD variants. Our clinical data suggest that dose-adapted 5‑FU-/capecitabine-chemoradiotherapy regimens can be safely considered in patients with heterozygous clinically relevant DPYD variants, but that the optimal dosage still needs to be determined to avoid both increased toxicity and undertreatment in a curative setting.

Purpose: This study compares the objective American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) and Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE-27) scores with the subjective Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) for patient outcome prediction.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy at the LMU Munich from June 2008 to June 2015. The study focused on associations between patient outcomes; treatment failures; known risk factors (including human papillomavirus [HPV] status and tumor stage); and the comorbidity indices ECOG-PS, ASA score, and ACE-27. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used for survival analysis and identifying independent risk factors.

Results: A total of 302 patients were analyzed, 175 received concurrent chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 61.8 months, and median age at diagnosis was 61 years. The 3‑ and 5‑year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 70.5%/60.2% and 64.7%/57.6%, respectively. Both ACE-27 and ASA showed significant correlations with OS in univariate and multivariate analyses, while ECOG-PS was significant only in univariate analysis. ASA and ACE-27 scores were also significantly correlated with local and locoregional recurrence, but only HPV status and tumor stage were significant in multivariate models.

Conclusion: ACE-27 and ASA score effectively categorize patients' risks in adjuvant radiotherapy for head and neck cancer, proving more predictive of overall survival than ECOG-PS. These results underscore the importance of objective comorbidity assessment and suggest further prospective studies.

Purpose: Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is a lethal pediatric brain tumor. Radiation therapy (RT) is the standard treatment, with reirradiation considered in case of progression. However, the prognostic factors for reirradiation are not well understood. This study aims to investigate the outcomes of DIPG patients undergoing reirradiation and identify clinical and radiomic prognostic factors.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with DIPG who underwent reirradiation at our institution between January 2016 and December 2023. Using PyRadiomics, we extracted radiomic features of tumors at the time of progression from FLAIR MRI images and collected clinical data. We used the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (lasso) for Cox's proportional hazard model with leave-one-out cross-validation to select optimal prognostic factors for survival after reirradiation.

Results: The study included 18 patients who underwent reirradiation at first progression, receiving a total dose of 20 Gy or 24 Gy in 2‑Gy fractions. Reirradiation was well tolerated, with no severe toxicity. Most patients (78%) showed neurological improvement after treatment. Median survival after progression was 29.2 weeks. The Cox model demonstrated a concordance of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.75-0.88), revealing that tumor sphericity and structural gray-level heterogeneity in FLAIR MRI images were associated with longer survival of reirradiated patients.

Conclusion: Reirradiation is a safe and effective approach for patients with DIPG. MRI-based radiomic models could be helpful in predicting survival after reirradiation.

Delayed radiation myelopathy (DRM) is a rare yet severe complication of radiotherapy. This condition has a progressive pattern that is often irreversible. Several therapeutic strategies have been introduced to alleviate disease complications, including corticosteroids, hyperbaric oxygen, anticoagulants, and antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents. However, despite their beneficial effect, they have not been the definitive treatments for DRM. Here we present the case of a 55-year-old woman with a history of multiple myeloma who developed neurological complications 11 months after radiation therapy. As her radiologic findings demonstrated transverse myelitis, based on the DRM diagnostic criteria, the diagnosis of delayed radiation myelitis was reached. Therefore, methylprednisolone pulse therapy was initiated, resulting in the complete resolution of her neurological symptoms. However, on her follow-up examination, although she did not have new neurological complications, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a residual enhancement in the thoracic spinal cord area. Hence, due to the possibility of myelitis progression and spinal cord atrophy, intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) was administered, resulting in the resolution of lesion enhancement. Considering this outcome and the immunomodulatory properties of IVIG, it could be regarded as a potential therapeutic option in the case of DRM activity.

Background: Bevacizumab shows superior efficacy in cerebral radiation necrosis (CRN) therapy, but its economic burden remains heavy due to the high drug price. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab for CRN treatment from the Chinese payers' perspective.

Methods: A decision tree model was developed to compare the costs and health outcomes of bevacizumab and corticosteroids for CRN therapy. Efficacy and safety data were derived from the NCT01621880 trial, which compared the effectiveness and safety of bevacizumab monotherapy with corticosteroids for CRN in nasopharyngeal cancer patients, and demonstrated that bevacizumab invoked a significantly higher response than corticosteroids (65.5% vs. 31.5%, P < 0.001) with no significant differences in adverse events between two groups. The utility value of the "non-recurrence" status was derived from real-world data. Costs and other utility values were collected from an authoritative Chinese network database and published literature. The primary outcomes were total costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The uncertainty of the model was evaluated via one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

Results: Bevacizumab treatment added 0.12 (0.48 vs. 0.36) QALYs compared to corticosteroid therapy, along with incremental costs of $ 2010 ($ 4260 vs. $ 2160). The resultant ICER was $ 16,866/QALY, which was lower than the willingness-to-pay threshold of $ 38,223/QALY in China. The price of bevacizumab, body weight, and the utility value of recurrence status were the key influential parameters for ICER. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that the probability of bevacizumab being cost-effectiveness was 84.9%.

Conclusion: Compared with corticosteroids, bevacizumab is an economical option for CRN treatment in China.