Strahlentherapie und Onkologie最新文献

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of radiotherapy combined with chemoimmunotherapy (RCIT) versus chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) alone as first-line treatment for oligometastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OESCC) at initial diagnosis.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 140 patients newly diagnosed with OESCC who received RCIT or CIT as first-line treatment between June 2018 and December 2021. Among them, 76 patients were in the RCIT cohort and 64 patients in the CIT cohort. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to simulate random allocation.

Results: After 1:1 PSM, 61 well-paired patients were selected. The median follow-up duration was 34.7 months (95%CI: 30.6-38.8 months). After PSM, the median PFS for the RCIT and CIT groups was 10.9 (95%CI: 9.4-12.4) months and 7.3 (95%CI: 6.0-8.7) months, respectively (P = 0.004). The median OS for the RCIT and CIT groups was 22.4 (95%CI: 17.5-27.4) months and 13.4 (95%CI: 10.9-15.9) months, respectively (P = 0.031). There were significant differences in PFS (median PFS: 12.9 vs. 8.6 vs. 7.3 months, P = 0.003) between the group receiving radiotherapy (RT) for all lesions, the group receiving RT for partial lesions, and the CIT group, while OS was on the threshold of significance (median OS: 29.4 vs. 17.3 vs. 13.4 months, P = 0.052). No significant differences in the incidence of grade 3 or higher (G3+) treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed between the two groups. However, the incidence of G3+ pneumonitis (13.1% vs 1.6%, P = 0.038) were higher in the RCIT group compared to the CIT group.

Conclusion: RCIT as first-line treatment for OESCC was safe and efficacious. RCIT improved PFS/OS compared to CIT without increasing the overall high grade toxicity rate. However, the increased incidence of pneumonitis due to RT implementation cannot be disregarded.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters on biochemical failure-free survival (BFS) in patients diagnosed with intermediate-risk prostate cancer and treated with robotic ultrahypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer undergoing robotic SBRT delivered in five fractions with a total radiation dose of 35-36.25 Gy. The primary endpoint was biochemical failure as defined by the Phoenix criteria. Among other clinicopathological data, T stage, Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score, and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based extra-prostatic extension (mEPE) score were collected and analyzed using the log-rank test.

Results: A total of 74 patients were eligible for analysis. Median age at treatment was 68.8 years and median prostate volume was 47.8 cm³. Fifty-four and 14 patients were diagnosed with Gleason scores 7a and 7b, respectively. In total, 40 patients were classified as having unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer according to American Urological Association/American Society for Radiation Oncology/ Society of Urologic Oncology (AUA/ASTRO/SUO) guidelines. The median follow-up was 30 months (range: 4-91.2 months; interquartile range (IQR): 18.5-48 months). The 3‑year BFS was 92%. A total of 12 (16.2%) biochemical failures were reported. In univariate analysis, an mEPE score of 5, the delivered total radiation dose (35 Gy vs. 36.25 Gy), and a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir >1 ng/ml were associated with lower BFS (mEPE-BFS: p < 0.001, total radiation dose-BFS: p = 0.04, PSA nadir-BFS: p =< 0.001).

Conclusion: Patients diagnosed with intermediate-risk prostate cancer with a high mEPE score are more likely to experience biochemical failure after SBRT. Treatment intensification measures, such as administration of concomitant ADT, should be considered.

Purpose: Recent advancements in imaging, particularly 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT), have improved the detection of involved lymph nodes, thus influencing staging accuracy and potentially treatment outcomes. This study is a post hoc analysis of the GAZAI trial data to evaluate the impact of FDG-PET/CT versus computed tomography (CT) alone on radiation target volumes for involved-site radiotherapy (IS-RT) in early-stage follicular lymphoma (FL).

Methods: All patients in the GAZAI trial underwent pretherapeutic FDG-PET/CT examinations, which were subject to central quality control. Lymph nodes with pathological metabolism were assessed for CT morphology. Differential regional involvement and the impact on radiation target volume for IS-RT were compared between PET/CT-based to solely CT-based staging.

Results: In 54 patients with PET-positive lymph nodes after initial surgery, 170 involved lymph nodes were identified in total. FDG-PET/CT identified additionally involved lymph nodes not detected by CT in 61% of the patients, leading to a significant change in radiation treatment fields for 30% of the cohort. Only 58% of all involved lymph nodes exhibited pathological CT morphology. The findings were robust across different Deauville score thresholds and CT morphological metrics.

Conclusion: The findings confirm the essential role of FDG-PET/CT in accurately defining the radiation volume for treatment of early-stage follicular lymphomas with radiotherapy. These results support the integration of FDG-PET/CT into the standard diagnostic pathway and its inclusion in the service catalogue of statutory health insurance, emphasizing its importance for optimal treatment planning and the potential impact on patient outcomes.

Background: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision (TME) is a standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPLNs) are often inadequately treated with standard regimens. This study examines the treatment and postoperative outcomes in LARC patients receiving a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) for LPLNs during long-course chemoradiotherapy.

Methods: This retrospective study included high-risk LARC patients (UICC, "Union Internationale Contre le Cancer", stage III) treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and SIB to LPLNs. Radiotherapy was delivered to the primary tumor and elective volumes with 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, and an SIB with a median dose of 60.2 Gy was administered to clinically positive LPLNs. TME quality and postoperative complications were assessed using MERCURY and Clavien-Dindo, respectively. Time-to-event data were analyzed according to Kaplan-Meier.

Results: Between 2019 and 2023, 27 patients with high-risk LARC and LPLN metastases were treated with chemoradiotherapy. After a median follow-up of 19 months, 2‑year overall survival was 80%, disease-free survival 80%, and local control of dose-escalated lymph nodes 100%. Three patients were managed nonoperatively after a clinical complete response on endoscopy and imaging. Of the 22 patients who had surgery, only one had complications higher than Clavien-Dindo grade I; TME was graded as MERCURY I in 73%.

Discussion and conclusion: The SIB approach for LPLNs in LARC is feasible, does not increase postoperative morbidity, and achieves excellent local control. This study supports the consideration of dose-escalated radiotherapy for LPLNs to address high local recurrence risks.

Purpose: This study focused on reducing the margin for prostate cancer treatment using magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiotherapy by investigating the intrafractional motion of the prostate and different motion-mitigation strategies.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed intrafractional prostate motion in 77 patients with low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with five fractions of 7.25 Gy on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance linear accelerator. Systematic drift motion was observed and described by an intrafractional motion model. The planning target volume (PTV) margin was calculated in a cohort of 77 patients and prospectively evaluated for geometric coverage in a separate cohort of 24 patients.

Results: The intrafractional model showed that the prostate position starts out of equilibrium for the anterior-posterior (-1.8 ± 3.1 mm) and superior-inferior (1.7 ± 2.6 mm) directions, with relaxation times of 12 and 15 min, respectively. Position verification scans are acquired at 30 min on average. At that time, the transient drift motion becomes indistinguishable from the residual random intrafractional motion. PTV margins can be reduced to 1.8 mm (left-right), 3.2 mm (anterior-posterior), and 2.9 mm (superior-inferior). Evaluation of the overlap with the clinical target volume (CTV) was performed for a total of 120 fractions of 24 patients. The overlap range between the CTV and the PTV was 93-100% and the applied 3‑mm PTV margin for the CTV had a 99.5% averaged geometric overlap for all patients.

Conclusion: A PTV margin reduction to 3 mm is feasible. A patient-specific approach could reduce the margins further.

Purpose: A comprehensive literature review was undertaken to understand the effects and underlying mechanisms of cranial radiotherapy (RT) on the hippocampus and hippocampal neurogenesis as well as to explore protective factors and treatments that might mitigate these effects in preclinical studies.

Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Embase were queried for studies involving the effects of radiation on the hippocampus and hippocampal neurogenesis. Data extraction followed the Animal Research Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines, and a risk of bias assessment was conducted for the included animal studies using the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) risk of bias tool.

Results: Ninety studies were included, with 48 assessing radiation-induced changes and 42 examining possible interventions. The majority of studies (97.8%) used experimental animal models. Studies demonstrated that cranial irradiation reduces hippocampal neurogenesis, particularly in the neurogenic niches of the dentate gyrus; causes alterations in gene expression and enzymatic activity; induces inflammation; promotes apoptosis; and often results in cognitive impairment. Potential protective strategies include pharmacological agents like metformin and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPAR-α) agonists or behavioral interventions like voluntary running. In a risk of bias assessment, many studies were rated as having an unclear risk of bias.

Conclusion: Radiotherapy, while essential for managing brain tumors, can have adverse effects on hippocampal function and structure in animal models. These effects manifest in reduced neurogenesis, molecular alterations, and increased inflammation, leading to cognitive deficits. Further research is needed to identify and improve interventions and develop comprehensive therapeutic approaches that balance effective tumor control with the preservation of cognitive health.

Purpose: Our objective was to identify the dosimetric parameters and prostate volume that most accurately predict the incidence of acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity in prostate cancer stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) treatments.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 122 patients who received SABR for prostate cancer at our clinic between March 2018 and September 2022 using a five-fraction SABR regimen. The existing plans of these patients were re-evaluated according to our institutional protocols (Hacettepe University [HU-1] and HU-2) as well as PACE‑B, RTOG 0938, and NRG GU005 dose-volume constraints. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed using SPSS version 23.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results: The median follow-up was 24.7 months (0.8-94.4 months). For acute GU toxicity, moderate-dose regions were predictive for grade 1-2 toxicity, while high-dose regions were more associated with grade 3-4 toxicity. For late GU toxicity, moderate-high-dose regions were predictive. For GI toxicity, moderate-dose regions were important for both acute and late toxicity. The HU protocol encompassed all significant dosimetric factors influencing toxicity outcomes. A prostate volume threshold of 60 cc was predictive of acute grade 3-4 GU toxicity.

Conclusion: Our study highlighted the critical role of moderate-dose regions for acute and late GI and GU toxicity. Prostate treatment plans should be rigorously evaluated, and moderate doses should be minimized. The HU protocol is an eligible choice for five-fraction SABR plans.

Purpose: Increasing life expectancy and advances in cancer treatment will lead to more patients needing both radiation therapy (RT) and cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). CIEDs, including pacemakers and defibrillators, are essential for managing cardiac arrhythmias and heart failure. Telemetric monitoring of CIEDs checks battery status, lead function, settings, and diagnostic data, thereby identifying software deviations or damage. This study evaluates the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO)/German Society for Cardiology (DGK) guideline, assessing real-world complications and risk factors and analyzing pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead function for their predictive value concerning device malfunction.

Methods: A total of 54 patients with pacemakers or ICDs who underwent radiation therapy were identified. Demographics, treatment courses, and device information from physical and digital records were extracted. DEGRO/DGK risk groups and pacemaker dependency at the start of RT were assessed. Delineation of the devices and lead insertion sites was performed in the treatment planning system. Dosimetric information from the treatment plans was then correlated with reports of standardized device checks.

Results: Over 80% of patients were treated with dual-chamber pacemakers or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), and 16.7% had ICDs. One third of patients were pacemaker dependent. 59.3% of patients were in the low-risk category, 29.3% in the medium-risk, and 11.1% in the high-risk category. Thoracic irradiation resulted in the highest median dose to devices. Lead parameter deviations exceeding thresholds were found in 14.8% for the stimulation threshold and 13.5% for sensing. Device malfunctions occurred in 3.7% of cases, both involving electrical resets and neutron-producing radiation (beam energy 10 megaelectron volt (MV) or higher).

Conclusion: Collecting lead parameters in addition to secure malfunctions like electrical restarts and memory erasure revealed a significant proportion of treatment courses with temporary changes, though no correlation with individual treatment plans or adverse events was found. The focus on reducing neutron-producing radiation could be further supported.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the correlations between complete blood count (CBC) during radiotherapy and patient and treatment factors.

Patients and methods: Data of cancer patients, including age, sex, concurrent chemotherapy (CCRT), radiotherapy dose (equivalent dose in 2‑Gy fractions with an alpha/beta value of 10 Gy, EQD2Gy10), radiotherapy location, and baseline CBC were collected. Linear regression was used to determine results during radiation. Validation data comprised 20% of the whole cohort.

Results: A total of 496 radiotherapy courses and 1884 weekly CBC results during treatment were analyzed. Baseline hemoglobin (Hb) was positively associated with subsequent Hb. Each 1 g/dL increase in baseline Hb predicted a 0.73 g/dL increase in Hb during treatment (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7-0.76). Male sex was associated with a 0.16 g/dL higher Hb (95% CI 0.04-0.29), while female sex showed the opposite trend. CCRT was associated with a 0.18 g/dL reduction in Hb (95% CI -0.33 to -0.03). Radiotherapy to the pelvis, bone, and head and neck regions resulted in Hb reductions of 0.18, 0.34, and 0.94 g/dL, respectively (95% CI -0.33 to -0.03, -0.53 to -0.15, and -1.26 to -0.62, respectively), while brain irradiation increased Hb by 0.22 g/dL (95% CI 0.05-0.38). Age, cumulative dose, and thoracic irradiation did not show a significant correlation with Hb changes. Adjusted R‑squared for the development and validation data were 0.6 and 0.71 for Hb, 0.42 and 0.11 for white blood cell count, 0.36 and 0.32 for neutrophils, 0.42 and 0.06 for absolute neutrophil count, and 0.43 and 0.36 for platelets, respectively.

Conclusion: Hb levels during radiotherapy could be explained using linear regression, although they did not negatively correlate with cumulative dose.

Purpose: The aim of this review is to give an overview of the results of prospective and retrospective studies using allogenic reconstruction and postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in breast cancer and to make recommendations regarding this interdisciplinary approach.

Materials and methods: A PubMed search was conducted to extract relevant articles from 2000 to 2024. The search was performed using the following terms: (breast cancer) AND (reconstruction OR implant OR expander) AND (radiotherapy OR radiation). Data from the literature on allogenic breast reconstruction and radiation are presented and discussed in relation to toxicity and cosmesis.

Conclusion and recommendations: Breast reconstruction is also feasible if PMRT is necessary. Patients need to be informed about the relevant risk of capsular fibrosis and implant failure. A planned reconstruction is no reason to forgo PMRT nor is an indication for PMRT a reason to forego implant-based breast reconstruction if desired by the patient. It is important to provide detailed information here to enable shared decision-making. There is still no clear consensus regarding implant-based reconstruction (IBR) and PMRT. However, in clinical practice, both a one-stage (immediate "implant-direct" IBR) procedure with PMRT up to the final implant and a two-stage (immediate-delayed IBR) procedure with PMRT up to the tissue expander (TE) and later exchange of the TE are used; both approaches have their specific advantages and disadvantages. Depending on patient-specific factors and the surgeon's experience and estimates, both IBR procedures are also possible in combination with PMRT. When using a TE/implant approach, completing skin stretching by adequately filling the expander before PMRT may be favorable. This approach is particularly practical when adjuvant chemotherapy is planned but may lead to postponement of radiotherapy when primary systemic therapy is given. According to the latest data, moderate hypofractionation also appears to be safe in the context of the IBR approach. It is important to have a closely coordinated interdisciplinary approach and to fully inform patients about the increased rate of potential side effects.