Strahlentherapie und Onkologie最新文献

Background and purpose: Many patients find it challenging to comply with instructions regarding rectum and bladder filling during pelvic radiotherapy. With the implementation of online adaptive radiotherapy, the reproducibility of organ volumes is no longer a prerequisite. This study aims to analyze the sparing of the bladder and the posterior rectum wall (PRW) in conditions of full versus empty bladder and rectum.

Methods: 280 fractions from 14 patients with prostate cancer who underwent adaptive radiotherapy using the Varian Ethos system were analyzed post-hoc. Various metrics for the bladder and PRW were correlated with respect to organ volume.

Results: Our analysis quantitatively confirms the advantage of a full bladder during radiotherapy, as metrics V48Gy and V40Gy significantly inversely correlate with bladder filling for each patient individually. While bladder volume did not show a gradual decrease over the course of radiotherapy, it was observed to be higher during planning CT scans compared to treatment sessions. A full rectum condition either significantly improved (in 2 out of 7 patients) or at least did not impair (in 5 out of 7 patients) PRW sparing, as represented by the V30Gy metric, when patients were compared individually. The average V30Gy across all patients demonstrated a significant improvement in PRW sparing for the full rectum condition, with a [Formula: see text]-value of 0.039.

Conclusion: Despite the implementation of adaptive therapy, maintaining a high bladder filling remains important. However, the recommendation for rectum filling can be abandoned, as reproducibility is not critical for adaptive radiotherapy and no dosimetric advantage per se is associated with an empty rectum. Patients may even be encouraged not to void their bowels shortly before treatment, as long as this is tolerated over the treatment session.

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze treatment-related risk factors for sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and an indication for hearing aids (IHA) in medulloblastoma patients after craniospinal radiotherapy (CSRT) and platin-based chemotherapy (PCth).

Methods: A total of 58 patients (116 ears) with medulloblastoma and clinically non-relevant pre-treatment hearing thresholds were included. Cranial radiotherapy and PCth were applied sequentially according to the HIT 2000 study protocol or post-study recommendations, the NOA-07 protocol, or the PNET (primitive neuroectodermal tumor) 5 MB therapy protocol. Audiological outcomes up to a maximum post-therapeutic follow-up of 4 years were assessed. The incidence, post-treatment progression, and time-to-onset of SNHL, defined as Muenster classification grade ≥MS2b, were evaluated. Risk factors for IHA were analyzed separately.

Results: While 39 patients received conventionally fractionated RT (CFRT; group 1), 19 patients received hyperfractionated RT (HFRT; group 2). Over a median follow-up of 40 months, 69.2% of ears in group 1 experienced SNHL ≥MS2b compared to 89.5% in group 2 (p = 0.017). In multivariable Cox regressions analysis, younger age and increased mean cochlear radiation dose calculated as the equivalent dose in 2‑Gy fractions (EQD2) were associated with time-to-onset of SNHL ≥MS2b (p = 0.019 and p = 0.023, respectively) and IHA (p < 0.001 and p = 0.016, respectively). Tomotherapy and supine positioning were associated with a lower risk for IHA in univariable modelling only (p = 0.048 and p = 0.027, respectively).

Conclusion: Young age and cochlear EQD2 D_mean ≥40 Gy are significant risk factors for the incidence, degree, and time-to-event of SNHL as well as for IHA in medulloblastoma patients.

Background and purpose: Combining chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with deep regional hyperthermia (HT) shows promise for enhancing clinical outcomes in selected rectal cancer patients. This study aimed to integrate the evidence and evaluate the efficacy of this combined treatment approach.

Materials and methods: A systematic search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Mendeley databases was performed. This review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The quality of studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Random-effects meta-analyses (DerSimonian and Laird) were performed. The primary outcome was pathological complete response (pCR), and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and toxicity.

Results: In total, 12 studies were included, mostly of moderate quality. Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC; n = 760) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC; n = 22) were eligible. The pooled pCR rate was 19% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16-22%) among all 782 patients and 19% (95%CI:16-23%) among 760 LARC patients. Due to significant study heterogeneity, survival outcomes were pooled by excluding LRRC patients. The pooled 5‑year OS rate among 433 LARC patients was 87% (95%CI: 83-90%). The pooled 5‑year DFS and LRFS in LARC patients were 75% (95%CI: 70-80%) and 95% (95%CI: 92-97%), respectively. There was a lack of consistent reporting of HT treatment parameters and toxicity symptoms among the studies.

Conclusion: The collective clinical evidence showed that neoadjuvant CRT combined with HT in rectal cancer patients is feasible, with a 19% pCR rate and excellent survival outcomes in long term follow-up.

Radiotherapy (RT) is a gold standard cancer treatment worldwide. However, RT has limitations and many side effects. Nanoparticles (NPs) have exclusive properties that allow them to be used in cancer therapy. Consequently, the combination of NP and RT opens up a new frontier in cancer treatment. Among NPs, gold nanoparticles (GNPs) are the most extensively studied and are considered ideal radiosensitizers for radiotherapy due to their unique physicochemical properties and high X‑ray absorption. This review analyzes the various roles of NPs as radiosensitizers in radiotherapy of glioblastoma (GBS), prostate cancer, and breast cancer and summarizes recent advances. Furthermore, the underlying mechanisms of NP radiosensitization, including physical, chemical, and biological mechanisms, are discussed, which may provide new directions for next-generation GNP optimization and clinical transformation.

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the risk factors of treatment-related pneumonitis (TRP) following thoracic radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy combined with anti-PD‑1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 97 patients with advanced ESCC who were treated with thoracic radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy combined with anti-PD‑1 mAbs. Among them, 56 patients received concurrent radiotherapy with anti-PD‑1 mAbs and 41 patients received sequential radiotherapy with anti-PD‑1 mAbs. The median prescribed planning target volume (PTV) dose was 59.4 Gy (range from 50.4 to 66 Gy, 1.8-2.2 Gy/fraction). Clinical characteristics, the percentage of lung volume receiving more than 5-50 Gy in increments of 5 Gy (V₅-V₅₀, respectively) and the mean lung dose (MLD) were analyzed as potential risk factors for TRP.

Results: 46.4% (45/97), 20.6% (20/97), 20.6% (20/97), 4.1% (4/97), and 1.0% (1/97) of the patients developed any grade of TRP, grade 1 TRP, grade 2 TRP, grade 3 TRP, and fatal (grade 5) TRP, respectively. Anti-PD‑1 mAbs administered concurrently with radiotherapy, V₅, V₁₀, V₁₅, V₂₅, V₃₀, V₃₅, V₄₀ and MLD were associated with the occurrence of grade 2 or higher TRP. Concurrent therapy (P = 0.010, OR = 3.990) and V₅ (P = 0.001, OR = 1.126) were independent risk factors for grade 2 or higher TRP. According to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the optimal V₅ threshold for predicting grade 2 or higher TRP was 55.7%.

Conclusion: The combination of thoracic radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy with anti-PD‑1 mAbs displayed a tolerable pulmonary safety profile. Although the incidence of TRP was high, grade 1-2 TRP accounted for the majority. Anti-PD‑1 mAbs administered concurrently with radiotherapy and the lung V₅ were significantly associated with the occurrence of grade 2 or higher TRP. Therefore, it seems safer to control V₅ below 55% in clinical, especially for the high-risk populations receiving concurrent therapy.

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare hematologic malignancy that can manifest with skin nodules and erythematous plaques. In most cases BPDCN progresses rapidly, causing multiple skin lesions and also affecting internal organs and bone marrow, warranting initiation of systemic therapies or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Although not curative, radiotherapy for isolated lesions might be indicated in case of (imminent) ulceration and large or symptomatic lesions. To this end, doses of 27.0-51.0 Gy have been reported. Here, we present the case of an 80-year-old male with BPDCN with multiple large, nodular, and ulcerating lesions of the thorax, abdomen, and face. Low-dose radiotherapy of 2 × 4.0 Gy was administered to several lesions, which resolved completely within 1 week with only light residual hyperpigmentation of the skin in affected areas and reliably prevented further ulceration. Radiotoxicity was not reported. Therefore, low-dose radiotherapy can be an effective and low-key treatment in selected cases of BPDCN, especially in a palliative setting, with a favorable toxicity profile.

Introduction: Risk factors for developing osteoradionecrosis (ORN) are well known, but less is known about factors influencing the interval between radiotherapy and the onset of ORN. Also, it is unknown whether there is any specific period post-radiotherapy with a reduced probability of ORN when irradiated teeth require extraction.

Purpose: The primary aim of this study was to identify factors influencing the interval in developing ORN in the following subgroups of patients: (1) patients who spontaneously developed ORN, (2) surgical-intervention-related ORN with a particular focus on patients after mandibulectomy. The secondary aim was to attempt to identify a possible time for safer dental intervention after primary treatment.

Materials and methods: The authors retrospectively analysed 1608 head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated in a single centre. Time intervals were measured from the end of radiotherapy to the development of ORN and further analysed in the subgroups listed above.

Results: In all, 141 patients (8.8%) developed intra-oral ORN. Median time from radiotherapy to ORN development in the whole cohort was 9 months. Median interval for spontaneous ORN was 8 months, 6.5 months for intervention-related ORN, and 15 months for patients post-mandibulectomy. In patients who required dental extraction preradiotherapy, median interval of ORN onset was 5 months.

Conclusion: In our study, a slightly higher proportion of patients with intervention developed ORN earlier in comparison with spontaneous ORN. The period from 12-18 months after radiotherapy was identified as having the highest probability of developing ORN in patients after mandibulectomy. A time for safer dental intervention after primary treatment was not identified.

Objectives: To assess the predictive value of different dosimetric parameters for acute radiation oral mucositis (ROM) in head and neck cancer (HNCs) patients treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT).

Methods: 44 patients with HNCs treated with CIRT were evaluated for acute ROM which was defined as severe when the score ≥3 (acute ROM was scored prospectively using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) score system). Predictive dosimetric factors were identified by using univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results: Male gender, weight loss >5%, and total dose/fractions were related factors to severe ROM. In multivariate analysis, grade ≥3 ROM was significantly related to the Dmax, D10, D15, and D20 (P < 0.05, respectively). As the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve shows, the area under the curve (AUC) for D10 was 0.77 (p = 0.003), and the cutoff value was 51.06 Gy (RBE); The AUC for D15 was 0.75 (p = 0.006), and the cutoff value was 42.82 Gy (RBE); The AUC for D20 was 0.74 (p = 0.009), and the cutoff value was 30.45 Gy (RBE); The AUC for Dmax was 0.81 (p < 0.001), and the cutoff value was 69.33 Gy (RBE).

Conclusion: Male gender, weight loss, and total dose/fractions were significantly association with ROM. Dmax, D10, D15 and D20 were identified as the most valuable predictor and we suggest a Dmax limit of 69.33 Gy (RBE), D10 limit of 51.06 Gy (RBE), D15 limit of 42.82 Gy (RBE), and D20 limit of 30.45 Gy (RBE) and for oral mucosa.

Background: This study aimed to investigate the clinical benefit of adding concurrent chemotherapy to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with an intermediate risk (stage II and T3N0M0).

Methods: A multicenter phase II randomized trial was conducted in intermediate-risk NPC patients. Enrolled patients were previously untreated and aged ranged from 18 to 70 years without severe coexisting diseases. Patients were randomly assigned to receive IMRT alone or IMRT+concurrent chemotherapy (CC; three cycles of 80 mg/m² cisplatin every 3 weeks). Primary endpoint was defined as 3‑year progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-associated toxicity. We registered this study with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (CliCTR1800017132; registered July 13, 2018, study start July 13, 2018).

Results: From November 2015 to July 2019, 42 patients with stage II and T3N0M0 NPC were enrolled; 20 patients received IMRT alone while 22 patients received IMRT+CC. After a median of 58 months of follow-up, we estimated the 3‑year PFS rates as 90% (IMRT group) and 86.4% (IMRT+CC group; hazard ratio 1.387, 95% confidence interval 0.240-8.014; P = 0.719). The 3‑year PFS, OS, and cumulative DMFS and LRRFS showed no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, the IMRT group displayed a lower incidence of nausea/vomiting, leucopenia, and dry mouth than the IMRT+CC group.

Conclusion: Adding CC to IMRT provided no survival benefit but increased treatment-associated toxicities in patients with intermediate-risk NPC.