Strahlentherapie und Onkologie最新文献

Purpose and objective: To develop expert consensus statements on multiparametric dose prescriptions for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) aligning with ICRU report 91. These statements serve as a foundational step towards harmonizing current SBRT practices and refining dose prescription and documentation requirements for clinical trial designs.

Materials and methods: Based on the results of a literature review by the working group, a two-tier Delphi consensus process was conducted among 24 physicians and physics experts from three European countries. The degree of consensus was predefined for overarching (OA) and organ-specific (OS) statements (≥ 80%, 60-79%, < 60% for high, intermediate, and poor consensus, respectively). Post-first round statements were refined in a live discussion for the second round of the Delphi process.

Results: Experts consented on a total of 14 OA and 17 OS statements regarding SBRT of primary and secondary lung, liver, pancreatic, adrenal, and kidney tumors regarding dose prescription, target coverage, and organ at risk dose limitations. Degree of consent was ≥ 80% in 79% and 41% of OA and OS statements, respectively, with higher consensus for lung compared to the upper abdomen. In round 2, the degree of consent was ≥ 80 to 100% for OA and 88% in OS statements. No consensus was reached for dose escalation to liver metastases after chemotherapy (47%) or single-fraction SBRT for kidney primaries (13%). In round 2, no statement had 60-79% consensus.

Conclusion: In 29 of 31 statements a high consensus was achieved after a two-tier Delphi process and one statement (kidney) was clearly refused. The Delphi process was able to achieve a high degree of consensus for SBRT dose prescription. In summary, clear recommendations for both OA and OS could be defined. This contributes significantly to harmonization of SBRT practice and facilitates dose prescription and reporting in clinical trials investigating SBRT.

Purpose: Automated treatment planning for multiple brain metastases differs from traditional planning approaches. It is therefore helpful to understand which parameters for optimization are available and how they affect the plan quality. This study aims to provide a reference for designing multi-metastases treatment plans and to define quality endpoints for benchmarking the technique from a scientific perspective.

Methods: In all, 20 patients with a total of 183 lesions were retrospectively planned according to four optimization scenarios. Plan quality was evaluated using common plan quality parameters such as conformity index, gradient index and dose to normal tissue. Therefore, different scenarios with combinations of optimization parameters were evaluated, while taking into account dependence on the number of treated lesions as well as influence of different beams.

Results: Different scenarios resulted in minor differences in plan quality. With increasing number of lesions, the number of monitor units increased, so did the dose to healthy tissue and the number of interlesional dose bridging in adjacent metastases. Highly modulated cases resulted in 4-10% higher V_10% compared to less complex cases, while monitor units did not increase. Changing the energy to a flattening filter free (FFF) beam resulted in lower local V_12Gy (whole brain-PTV) and even though the number of monitor units increased by 13-15%, on average 46% shorter treatment times were achieved.

Conclusion: Although no clinically relevant differences in parameters where found, we identified some variation in the dose distributions of the different scenarios. Less complex scenarios generated visually more dose overlap; therefore, a more complex scenario may be preferred although differences in the quality metrics appear minor.

Purpose: No standard treatment has yet been established for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). In this context, the aim of the current study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of reirradiation (re-RT) by radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/FSRT) in association with regorafenib.

Methods: Patients with a histological or radiological diagnosis of recurrent GBM who received re-RT by SRS/FSRT and regorafenib as second-line systemic therapy were included in the analysis.

Results: From January 2020 to December 2022, 21 patients were evaluated. The median time between primary/adjuvant RT and disease recurrence was 8 months (range 5-20). Median re-RT dose was 24 Gy (range 18-36 Gy) for a median number of 5 fractions (range 1-6). Median regorafenib treatment duration was 12 weeks (range 3-26). Re-RT was administered before starting regorafenib or in the week off regorafenib during the course of chemotherapy. The median and the 6‑month overall survival (OS) from recurrence were 8.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.9-12.7 months) and 75% (95% CI 50.9-89.1%), respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) from recurrence was 6 months (95% CI 3.7-8.5 months). The most frequent side effects were asthenia that occurred in 10 patients (8 cases of grade 2 and 2 cases of grade 3), and hand-foot skin reaction (2 patients grade 3, 3 patients grade 2). Adverse events led to permanent regorafenib discontinuation in 2 cases, while in 5/21 cases (23.8%), a dose reduction was administered. One patient experienced dehiscence of the surgical wound after reintervention and during regorafenib treatment, while another patient reported intestinal perforation that required hospitalization.

Conclusion: For recurrent GBM, re-RT with SRT/FSRT plus regorafenib is a safe treatment. Prospective trials are necessary.

This article presents the rare case of a 54-year-old gentleman with primary glioblastoma developing multiple extracranial metastases 7 months after diagnosis. Initially, the patient complained of progressive headaches, confusion, and weakness of the left arm. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain showed a right temporoparietal tumor with substantial surrounding subcortical edema and midline shift to the left. Two consecutive craniotomies resulted in complete microsurgical resection of the lesion. Histology was consistent with a World Health Organization grade IV, IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. Further treatment was standard chemoradiation including intensity-modulated radiotherapy with oral temozolomide chemotherapy. Seven months after diagnosis, the cranial lesion progressed, and the patient developed painful metastases in multiple bones and suspicious right-sided cervical lymph nodes. Immunohistochemistry and molecular signature supported the case of a metastatic glioblastoma. Further treatment was palliative radiotherapy of the spinal lesions along with symptomatic pain management. Extracranial metastasis of glioblastoma is a rare complication of which only a few cases have been reported in the literature. Little is known about the precise mechanisms of tumor dissemination and the appropriate treatment.

Purpose: Sarcopenia may complicate treatment in cancer patients. Herein, we assessed whether sarcopenia measurements derived from radiation planning computed tomography (CT) were associated with complications and tumor progression during radiochemotherapy for glioblastoma.

Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing radiotherapy planning for glioblastoma between 2010 and 2021 were analyzed. Retrocervical muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured via threshold-based semi-automated radiation planning CT analysis. Patients in the lowest sex-specific quartile of muscle measurements were defined as sarcopenic. We abstracted treatment characteristics and tumor progression from the medical records and performed uni- and multivariable time-to-event analyses.

Results: We included 363 patients in our cohort (41.6% female, median age 63 years, median time to progression 7.7 months). Sarcopenic patients were less likely to receive chemotherapy (p < 0.001) and more likely to be treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy (p = 0.005). Despite abbreviated treatment, they more often discontinued radiotherapy (p = 0.023) and were more frequently prescribed corticosteroids (p = 0.014). After treatment, they were more often transferred to inpatient palliative care treatment (p = 0.035). Finally, progression-free survival was substantially shorter in sarcopenic patients in univariable (median 5.1 vs. 8.4 months, p < 0.001) and multivariable modeling (hazard ratio 0.61 [confidence interval 0.46-0.81], p = 0.001).

Conclusion: Sarcopenia is a strong risk factor for treatment discontinuation and reduced progression-free survival in glioblastoma patients. We propose that sarcopenic patients should receive intensified supportive care during radiotherapy and during follow-up as well as expedited access to palliative care.

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems may personalise radiotherapy by assessing complex and multifaceted patient data and predicting tumour and normal tissue responses to radiotherapy. Here we describe three distinct generations of AI systems, namely personalised radiotherapy based on pretreatment data, response-driven radiotherapy and dynamically optimised radiotherapy. Finally, we discuss the main challenges in clinical translation of AI systems for radiotherapy personalisation.

Purpose: Modern photon radiotherapy effectively spares cardiac structures more than previous volumetric approaches. Still, it is related to non-negligible cardiac toxicity due to the low-dose bath of surrounding normal tissues. However, the dosimetric advantages of particle radiotherapy make it a promising treatment for para- and intra-cardiac tumours. In the current short report, we evaluate the cardiac safety profile of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for radioresistant intra- and para-cardiac malignancies in a real-world setting.

Methods: We retrospectively analysed serum biomarkers (TnI, CRP and NT-proBNP), echocardiographic, and both 12-lead and 24-hour Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) data of consecutive patients with radioresistant intra- and para-cardiac tumours irradiated with CIRT between June 2019 and September 2022. In the CIRT planning optimization process, to minimize the delivered doses, we contoured and gave a high priority to the cardiac substructures. Weekly re-evaluative 4D computed tomography scans were carried out throughout the treatment.

Results: A total of 16 patients with intra- and para-cardiac localizations of radioresistant tumours were treated up to a total dose of 70.4 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and a mean heart dose of 2.41 Gy(RBE). We did not record any significant variation of the analysed serum biomarkers after CIRT nor significant changes of echocardiographic features, biventricular strain, or 12-lead and 24-hour Holter ECG parameters during 6 months of follow-up.

Conclusion: Our pilot study suggests that carbon ion radiotherapy is a promising radiation technique capable of sparing off-target side effects at the cardiac level. A larger cohort, long-term follow-up and further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.