Rdeča nit tematskega bloka pričujoče številke revije Ars & Humanitas, kot je zgovoren že njegov naslov »Polnost praznine: budizem med podobo in izkustvom«, je praznina, temeljna idejna podstat celotnega budizma, že vse od njegovih začetkov, ki jih je ob uvidu v nestalnost vsega živečega vztrajno gradil utemeljitelj tradicije Siddhartha Gavtama Buddha (ok. 560–480 pr. n. št.). Po njegovi smrti, ko se je budizem v svojem plodnem razvoju razvejal na številne tokove in šole, tudi izven meja Indije, je praznina privzela raznolike podobe, te pa druži njena bistvena lastnost, ki se pretaka skozi vsa miselna obzorja tradicije, in je povsem nasprotna običajnemu razumevanju praznine kot negativitete v smislu breztemeljnega in brezplodnega niča. V budizmu, zlasti v luči nauka o minljivosti in tesni medsebojni povezanosti vsega živečega, je praznina namreč opredeljena kot dinamična totaliteta bivajočega.
{"title":"Polnost praznine: budizem med podobo in izkustvom","authors":"Nina Petek","doi":"10.4312/ars.16.2.5-12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4312/ars.16.2.5-12","url":null,"abstract":"Rdeča nit tematskega bloka pričujoče številke revije Ars & Humanitas, kot je zgovoren že njegov naslov »Polnost praznine: budizem med podobo in izkustvom«, je praznina, temeljna idejna podstat celotnega budizma, že vse od njegovih začetkov, ki jih je ob uvidu v nestalnost vsega živečega vztrajno gradil utemeljitelj tradicije Siddhartha Gavtama Buddha (ok. 560–480 pr. n. št.). Po njegovi smrti, ko se je budizem v svojem plodnem razvoju razvejal na številne tokove in šole, tudi izven meja Indije, je praznina privzela raznolike podobe, te pa druži njena bistvena lastnost, ki se pretaka skozi vsa miselna obzorja tradicije, in je povsem nasprotna običajnemu razumevanju praznine kot negativitete v smislu breztemeljnega in brezplodnega niča. V budizmu, zlasti v luči nauka o minljivosti in tesni medsebojni povezanosti vsega živečega, je praznina namreč opredeljena kot dinamična totaliteta bivajočega.","PeriodicalId":221912,"journal":{"name":"Ars & Humanitas","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125416898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-29DOI: 10.4312/ars.16.2.165-178
Adnan Sivić, S. Vörös
As Zen took root in the West over the past century, there emerged a number of differing interpretations of one of its key facets, namely the question of the relationship between language and enlightenment. The two camps which came to garner the most attention in philosophical circles are eliminativism, which understands enlightenment as the cutting off of linguistic and socio-cultural categories, accomplished by arbitrary means, and constructivism, which identifies satori with the exercise of certain linguistic and cultural conventions. In the present paper, we first lay out some of the most important criticisms of these two positions, arguing that the two accounts fall into the error of either demonizing or fetishizing language, respectively, before outlining a different approach to the relationship between practice and realization, drawing on the largely neglected work of perennialist thinkers and a phenomenologically informed notion of symbolism. By taking the idea of the symbol in its double meaning, namely as that which “casts together” the culturally conditioned particularities of Zen into a unified tradition, and yet points beyond them as a “sign” of something that itself transcends all description, we propose an interpretation that can do justice both to the crucial role played by concrete practices and to the transcendent nature of their soteriological “end”.
{"title":"Beyond Elimination and Construction","authors":"Adnan Sivić, S. Vörös","doi":"10.4312/ars.16.2.165-178","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4312/ars.16.2.165-178","url":null,"abstract":"As Zen took root in the West over the past century, there emerged a number of differing interpretations of one of its key facets, namely the question of the relationship between language and enlightenment. The two camps which came to garner the most attention in philosophical circles are eliminativism, which understands enlightenment as the cutting off of linguistic and socio-cultural categories, accomplished by arbitrary means, and constructivism, which identifies satori with the exercise of certain linguistic and cultural conventions. In the present paper, we first lay out some of the most important criticisms of these two positions, arguing that the two accounts fall into the error of either demonizing or fetishizing language, respectively, before outlining a different approach to the relationship between practice and realization, drawing on the largely neglected work of perennialist thinkers and a phenomenologically informed notion of symbolism. By taking the idea of the symbol in its double meaning, namely as that which “casts together” the culturally conditioned particularities of Zen into a unified tradition, and yet points beyond them as a “sign” of something that itself transcends all description, we propose an interpretation that can do justice both to the crucial role played by concrete practices and to the transcendent nature of their soteriological “end”.","PeriodicalId":221912,"journal":{"name":"Ars & Humanitas","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115182899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-22DOI: 10.4312/ars.16.1.167-180
Enrique Baena Peña
A partir de las vanguardias, la quiebra estética del universo cerrado dio carta de naturaleza de modo agudo a la autoconciencia literaria. Asimismo, frente a una invención unívoca, lo extraterritorial asumió un papel renovador en el propio desarrollo de esta autoconciencia. Afloran en ello raíces de universalidad y de representaciones simbólicas, a partir de las propias lejanías espaciales. Una inmensa capacidad del imaginario donde no solo se desvela la utopía, junto a los procesos de persuasión, sino también el abismo de la escritura y su carácter fragmentario. Proyecciones que alentaron en el círculo de escritores tratados la rehumanización, que daba entrada a otra época, a un camino de futuro fundado en la expresividad existencial, su realización en lo histórico y los sincretismos entre poesía, filosofía, ensayo y narratividad. María Zambrano, Emilio Prados, Manuel Altolaguirre, José Gaos, José Moreno Villa, Juan David García Bacca, Luis Cernuda, Manuel Andújar, José Bergamín o Adolfo Sánchez Vázquez, entre otros, componen el conjunto de los autores que desde el exilio en México protagonizaron uno de los capítulos más relevantes de la autoconciencia literaria y estética contemporánea en el orbe hispánico.
从先锋派开始，封闭宇宙的美学崩溃以一种尖锐的方式赋予了文学自我意识的自然字母。在这种自我意识的发展中，域外因素也发挥了更新的作用，而不是单一的发明。在这里，普遍性和象征表现的根源从空间的遥远中浮现出来。这是一种巨大的想象能力，它不仅揭示了乌托邦，以及说服的过程，而且还揭示了写作的深渊及其碎片性。这些预测鼓励了作家圈的重新人性化，开启了另一个时代，一条基于存在表现力的未来之路，它在历史上的实现，以及诗歌、哲学、散文和叙事的融合。玛丽亚Zambrano Emilio草地、何塞·曼努埃尔·吉雷Gaos Juan David garcia Bacca,何塞·莫雷诺别墅Manuel Andújar jose Luis Cernuda Bergamín桑切斯或阿道夫·巴斯克斯等联合组成的起草者从流亡在墨西哥联盟最重要的一个世界当代文学和美学意识在西班牙。
{"title":"Valores de universalidad y representaciones simbólicas (escritores españoles extraterritoriales)","authors":"Enrique Baena Peña","doi":"10.4312/ars.16.1.167-180","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4312/ars.16.1.167-180","url":null,"abstract":"A partir de las vanguardias, la quiebra estética del universo cerrado dio carta de naturaleza de modo agudo a la autoconciencia literaria. Asimismo, frente a una invención unívoca, lo extraterritorial asumió un papel renovador en el propio desarrollo de esta autoconciencia. Afloran en ello raíces de universalidad y de representaciones simbólicas, a partir de las propias lejanías espaciales. Una inmensa capacidad del imaginario donde no solo se desvela la utopía, junto a los procesos de persuasión, sino también el abismo de la escritura y su carácter fragmentario. Proyecciones que alentaron en el círculo de escritores tratados la rehumanización, que daba entrada a otra época, a un camino de futuro fundado en la expresividad existencial, su realización en lo histórico y los sincretismos entre poesía, filosofía, ensayo y narratividad. María Zambrano, Emilio Prados, Manuel Altolaguirre, José Gaos, José Moreno Villa, Juan David García Bacca, Luis Cernuda, Manuel Andújar, José Bergamín o Adolfo Sánchez Vázquez, entre otros, componen el conjunto de los autores que desde el exilio en México protagonizaron uno de los capítulos más relevantes de la autoconciencia literaria y estética contemporánea en el orbe hispánico.","PeriodicalId":221912,"journal":{"name":"Ars & Humanitas","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125442953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
L’articolo approfondisce il rapporto tra la letteratura latina e il principato augusteo con attenzione alle elegie romane di Properzio. Vengono prese in esame le trasformazioni del suo genere letterario nel IV libro, ricco di nuovi temi (religiosi, eziologici, morali), sia nel contesto storico-culturale che nel rapporto con gli altri membri del circolo di Mecenate (Virgilio, Orazio), evidenziando anche i possibili influssi dell’autore sul princeps.
{"title":"Qua maxima Roma est","authors":"Francesca Boldrer","doi":"10.4312/ars.16.1.7-27","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4312/ars.16.1.7-27","url":null,"abstract":"L’articolo approfondisce il rapporto tra la letteratura latina e il principato augusteo con attenzione alle elegie romane di Properzio. Vengono prese in esame le trasformazioni del suo genere letterario nel IV libro, ricco di nuovi temi (religiosi, eziologici, morali), sia nel contesto storico-culturale che nel rapporto con gli altri membri del circolo di Mecenate (Virgilio, Orazio), evidenziando anche i possibili influssi dell’autore sul princeps.","PeriodicalId":221912,"journal":{"name":"Ars & Humanitas","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127929400","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The paper analyses the passage from Athanasius’ Vita Antonii, where Antony is corresponding with Constantine, Constantius and Constans, contrasting it with a very different portrayal of Constantine in Eusebius’ Vita Constantini. While Eusebius, in a famous statement, presented the emperor as a sort of a bishop, the Greek Vita Antonii tried to present a very different model, one that seems to be sceptical of the imperial power and perhaps of earthly society as such. The point was not lost on those who later developed the genre, as can be seen in the writings of Sulpicius Severus, the author of Vita Martini, written at the end of the fourth century, where the three emperors from Vita Antonii are paralleled with three different emperors, in a much sharper relief, subverting secular power and underlining the superiority of its spiritual alternative.
{"title":"“He is Human, Too”","authors":"David Movrin","doi":"10.4312/ars.16.1.65-75","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4312/ars.16.1.65-75","url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyses the passage from Athanasius’ Vita Antonii, where Antony is corresponding with Constantine, Constantius and Constans, contrasting it with a very different portrayal of Constantine in Eusebius’ Vita Constantini. While Eusebius, in a famous statement, presented the emperor as a sort of a bishop, the Greek Vita Antonii tried to present a very different model, one that seems to be sceptical of the imperial power and perhaps of earthly society as such. The point was not lost on those who later developed the genre, as can be seen in the writings of Sulpicius Severus, the author of Vita Martini, written at the end of the fourth century, where the three emperors from Vita Antonii are paralleled with three different emperors, in a much sharper relief, subverting secular power and underlining the superiority of its spiritual alternative.","PeriodicalId":221912,"journal":{"name":"Ars & Humanitas","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114834666","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Il presente articolo assume due celebri passi di Virgilio (Eneide, VI 860–886) e di Orazio (Odi, IV 2) come casi di studio per indagare la relazione fra il potere imperiale romano allo stato nascente e gli strumenti eulogistici di tradizione greca. In mancanza di modelli ellenistici specificamente riconoscibili, l’“epicedio per Marcello” sembra riproporre motivi topici della lirica celebrativa arcaica: la bellezza come simbolo esteriore di valentia; la lode come elogio non strettamente ad personam, ma da rivolgere all’intera casata del destinatario; la poesia come insostituibile strumento di gloria immortale. Lo stesso vale per l’ode ad Augusto vincitore sui Sigambri, tutta giocata sul rapporto con il modello pindarico, e condotta secondo un accorto uso della recusatio e della praeteritio che ricorda la struttura dell’“encomio a Policrate” ibiceo. Nel momento stesso in cui viene a formarsi l’impero romano, e di conseguenza si manifesta la necessità di offrirne una rappresentazione letteraria che possa diventare paradigmatica, due fra i massimi poeti augustei si volgerebbero dunque agli autori della lirica greca arcaica, noti e praticati nella Roma del tempo, di cui riprendono temi e arsenale retorico: pare emergere, insomma, una tendenza di riappropriazione retorico-letteraria, meritevole di indagini sistematiche su un campione testuale più ampio.
这篇文章采用维吉尔(Eneide, VI 860 - 886)和荷瑞修(Odi, IV 2)的两个著名步骤，作为研究新兴罗马帝国权力与希腊传统文学工具之间关系的案例研究。在缺乏具体可识别的希腊模型的情况下，“马塞洛的享乐主义”似乎再现了古代庆祝歌剧的主题:美是瓦伦西亚的外在象征;赞美不只是对个人的赞美，而是对接受者的整个家庭的赞美;诗歌是不朽荣耀的不可替代的工具。同样的道理也适用于在Sigambri上获胜的Augusto ode，所有这些都是在与pindaric模型的关系上进行的，并且是在谨慎使用恢复和praeteritio的基础上进行的，这让人想起了ibiceo的“多聚引用”结构。在这个时候被罗马帝国形成明显,因此,需要带一个范式能够成为文学代表性,因此,两个最大的诗人augustei改动和古老的希腊歌剧的作者、知名的时间,其中包括罗马和修辞手段:因此，似乎出现了一种趋势，即对更广泛的文本样本进行系统的调查。
{"title":"Potere imperiale romano e strumenti eulogistici greci","authors":"E. Pitotto","doi":"10.4312/ars.16.1.29-45","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4312/ars.16.1.29-45","url":null,"abstract":"Il presente articolo assume due celebri passi di Virgilio (Eneide, VI 860–886) e di Orazio (Odi, IV 2) come casi di studio per indagare la relazione fra il potere imperiale romano allo stato nascente e gli strumenti eulogistici di tradizione greca.\u0000In mancanza di modelli ellenistici specificamente riconoscibili, l’“epicedio per Marcello” sembra riproporre motivi topici della lirica celebrativa arcaica: la bellezza come simbolo esteriore di valentia; la lode come elogio non strettamente ad personam, ma da rivolgere all’intera casata del destinatario; la poesia come insostituibile strumento di gloria immortale. Lo stesso vale per l’ode ad Augusto vincitore sui Sigambri, tutta giocata sul rapporto con il modello pindarico, e condotta secondo un accorto uso della recusatio e della praeteritio che ricorda la struttura dell’“encomio a Policrate” ibiceo.\u0000Nel momento stesso in cui viene a formarsi l’impero romano, e di conseguenza si manifesta la necessità di offrirne una rappresentazione letteraria che possa diventare paradigmatica, due fra i massimi poeti augustei si volgerebbero dunque agli autori della lirica greca arcaica, noti e praticati nella Roma del tempo, di cui riprendono temi e arsenale retorico: pare emergere, insomma, una tendenza di riappropriazione retorico-letteraria, meritevole di indagini sistematiche su un campione testuale più ampio.","PeriodicalId":221912,"journal":{"name":"Ars & Humanitas","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125983096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-22DOI: 10.4312/ars.16.1.193-204
Matic Kocijančič
Martin Heidegger je svoje branje Sofoklove Antigone razgrnil v dveh znamenitih sklopih predavanj na Univerzi v Freiburgu; prvi sklop, ki ga je študentom predstavil leta 1935, je osemnajst let pozneje s popravki in dopolnitvami objavil v knjigi Uvod v metafiziko (Einführung in die Metaphysik); drugega, ki ga je naslovil Hölderlinova himna »Ister« (Hölderlins Hymne »Der Ister«), je lahko leta 1942, sredi vojne vihre, podal le v okrnjeni različici, v natisnjeni celoti pa je svetovni javnosti postal dostopen šele leta 1984. Članek preučuje razloge, zakaj je razkritje Heideggerjeve druge obravnave Antigone – ki s prvo vzpostavlja intriganten interpretativni kontrast – odigralo ključno vlogo v osrednjem filozofskem projektu Tineta Hribarja in s tem v širši slovenski recepciji mita o Antigoni od druge polovice osemdesetih let do danes.
马丁-海德格尔在弗莱堡大学的两组著名演讲中阐述了他对索福克勒斯的《安提戈涅》的解读；第一组演讲是他于 1935 年向学生们发表的，18 年后，经过修改和补充，在《形而上学导论》（Einführung in die Metaphysik）中出版；第二册，他将其命名为《荷尔德林的颂歌 "Der Ister"》（Hölderlins Hymne "Der Ister"），1942 年，在战争的风暴中，只能以简略的版本发表，直到 1984 年才以印刷品的形式与世界公众见面。海德格尔对《安提戈涅》的第二种解读与第一种解读形成了有趣的诠释对比，本文探讨了海德格尔的第二种解读为何在蒂内-赫里巴尔的核心哲学项目中发挥了至关重要的作用，从而在斯洛文尼亚从 20 世纪 80 年代后半期至今对《安提戈涅》神话的广泛接受中发挥了至关重要的作用。
{"title":"Od nacistične Antigone do »antifašistične« etike svetosti","authors":"Matic Kocijančič","doi":"10.4312/ars.16.1.193-204","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4312/ars.16.1.193-204","url":null,"abstract":"Martin Heidegger je svoje branje Sofoklove Antigone razgrnil v dveh znamenitih sklopih predavanj na Univerzi v Freiburgu; prvi sklop, ki ga je študentom predstavil leta 1935, je osemnajst let pozneje s popravki in dopolnitvami objavil v knjigi Uvod v metafiziko (Einführung in die Metaphysik); drugega, ki ga je naslovil Hölderlinova himna »Ister« (Hölderlins Hymne »Der Ister«), je lahko leta 1942, sredi vojne vihre, podal le v okrnjeni različici, v natisnjeni celoti pa je svetovni javnosti postal dostopen šele leta 1984.\u0000Članek preučuje razloge, zakaj je razkritje Heideggerjeve druge obravnave Antigone – ki s prvo vzpostavlja intriganten interpretativni kontrast – odigralo ključno vlogo v osrednjem filozofskem projektu Tineta Hribarja in s tem v širši slovenski recepciji mita o Antigoni od druge polovice osemdesetih let do danes.","PeriodicalId":221912,"journal":{"name":"Ars & Humanitas","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125768155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This thematic issue is not simply about political appropriations of Rome and its empire in later times (e. g. Byzantium as a New Rome, the Holy Roman Empire of the German nation, the US as the final goal of the translatio imperii from the East to the West, etc.). Instead, it is dedicated to the role specific paradigmatic patterns related to the Roman Empire played in political imaginaries and literature. The initiative for this collection of papers originated in the research project “Empire and Transformation of Genre in Roman Literature”, funded by the Slovenian Research Agency (J6-2585). A live conference on the topic was planned for 2021 but had to be called off for obvious reasons. In spite of this, the virtual exchange of ideas between the contributors amounted to forming an ad hoc research group that is supposed to come together again, in person, at a forthcoming international event.
{"title":"The Roman Empire as a paradigm in politics and literature","authors":"Marko Marinčič","doi":"10.4312/ars.16.1.5-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4312/ars.16.1.5-6","url":null,"abstract":"This thematic issue is not simply about political appropriations of Rome and its empire in later times (e. g. Byzantium as a New Rome, the Holy Roman Empire of the German nation, the US as the final goal of the translatio imperii from the East to the West, etc.). Instead, it is dedicated to the role specific paradigmatic patterns related to the Roman Empire played in political imaginaries and literature. The initiative for this collection of papers originated in the research project “Empire and Transformation of Genre in Roman Literature”, funded by the Slovenian Research Agency (J6-2585). A live conference on the topic was planned for 2021 but had to be called off for obvious reasons. In spite of this, the virtual exchange of ideas between the contributors amounted to forming an ad hoc research group that is supposed to come together again, in person, at a forthcoming international event.","PeriodicalId":221912,"journal":{"name":"Ars & Humanitas","volume":"4052 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127549202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-22DOI: 10.4312/ars.16.1.131-164
Darja Šterbenc Erker
Im Aufsatz werden die literarischen Bilder der Kleopatra VII analysiert, der Königin des antiken Ägypten, welche die Verbündete des Antonius in seiner Auseinandersetzung mit Oktavian war. Oktavian hat Antonius und Kleopatra in der Schlacht bei Actium im Jahr 31 v. Chr. besiegt und Alexandrien im drauffolgenden Jahr erobert. Er propagierte Antonius als den verweiblichten Ehemann der Orientalin Kleopatra, der vermeintlich in Ausschweifung und außerordentlichem Luxus gelebt und eine drohende Gefahr für das römische Imperium und den Westen verkörpert habe. Darüber hinaus werden die Transformationen untersucht, die Kleopatras Bild in verschiedenen literarischen Gattungen in der Antike unterlief, seine Rezeption in der Renaissance-Malerei und im modernen Film. Dabei wird der Orientalismusbegriff von Edward Saïd in Bezug auf Aischylos’ Perser nuanciert, um herauszustellen, dass er die Perser nicht nur als mit griechischen Sitten vertraut darstellt, sondern auch als Barbaren. Weiter wird diskutiert, wie Oktavian durch seine politische Invektive gegen Antonius das Bild von Kleopatra beeinflusst hat. Augusteische Dichter arbeiteten in ihre Gedichte einige Reflexe von Oktavians Bild der ägyptischen Königin im Einvernehmen mit den Tropen ihrer jeweiligen literarischen Gattung ein. Horaz stellt in der Epode 9 Kleopatras Ehemann Antonius in einer der Invektive ähnlichen Weise als ihren Sklaven und Eunuchen dar. Im ersten Teil der Ode 1.37 suggeriert Horaz, Kleopatra sei ein Monster und eine verruchte Königin, wohingegen er im zweiten Teil betont, dass sie ihre Niederlage mit der Würde einer guten Herrscherin angenommen habe. Römische Elegiker schildern Kleopatra passend zu den Tropen der Liebeselegie als elegische Herrin und Antonius als ihren Sklaven. Vergil inszeniert in seiner Aeneis den Zusammenprall zwischen Kleopatras Osten und dem Westen, welcher durch Augustus repräsentiert ist, aber der epische Erzählrahmen der Episode, die Ekphrasis von Aeneas’ Schild, betont ihren fiktiven Charakter und hebt die Fluidität der stereotypen Zuschreibung von Fremdheit und Weiblichkeit hervor. In der europäischen Malerei und in Filmen eignete man sich stereotype und orientalisierende Kleopatra-Bilder an. Seit der Neuzeit ist Kleopatra zu einer konstruierten Figur geworden, die häufig im Dienste der orientalistischen Machtdiskurse, des nationalstaatlichen Imperialismus und im letzten Jahrhundert auch der Käuferlenkung steht.
{"title":"Kleopatra, Imperialismus und Orientalismus","authors":"Darja Šterbenc Erker","doi":"10.4312/ars.16.1.131-164","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4312/ars.16.1.131-164","url":null,"abstract":"Im Aufsatz werden die literarischen Bilder der Kleopatra VII analysiert, der Königin des antiken Ägypten, welche die Verbündete des Antonius in seiner Auseinandersetzung mit Oktavian war. Oktavian hat Antonius und Kleopatra in der Schlacht bei Actium im Jahr 31 v. Chr. besiegt und Alexandrien im drauffolgenden Jahr erobert. Er propagierte Antonius als den verweiblichten Ehemann der Orientalin Kleopatra, der vermeintlich in Ausschweifung und außerordentlichem Luxus gelebt und eine drohende Gefahr für das römische Imperium und den Westen verkörpert habe. Darüber hinaus werden die Transformationen untersucht, die Kleopatras Bild in verschiedenen literarischen Gattungen in der Antike unterlief, seine Rezeption in der Renaissance-Malerei und im modernen Film. Dabei wird der Orientalismusbegriff von Edward Saïd in Bezug auf Aischylos’ Perser nuanciert, um herauszustellen, dass er die Perser nicht nur als mit griechischen Sitten vertraut darstellt, sondern auch als Barbaren. Weiter wird diskutiert, wie Oktavian durch seine politische Invektive gegen Antonius das Bild von Kleopatra beeinflusst hat.\u0000Augusteische Dichter arbeiteten in ihre Gedichte einige Reflexe von Oktavians Bild der ägyptischen Königin im Einvernehmen mit den Tropen ihrer jeweiligen literarischen Gattung ein. Horaz stellt in der Epode 9 Kleopatras Ehemann Antonius in einer der Invektive ähnlichen Weise als ihren Sklaven und Eunuchen dar. Im ersten Teil der Ode 1.37 suggeriert Horaz, Kleopatra sei ein Monster und eine verruchte Königin, wohingegen er im zweiten Teil betont, dass sie ihre Niederlage mit der Würde einer guten Herrscherin angenommen habe. Römische Elegiker schildern Kleopatra passend zu den Tropen der Liebeselegie als elegische Herrin und Antonius als ihren Sklaven. Vergil inszeniert in seiner Aeneis den Zusammenprall zwischen Kleopatras Osten und dem Westen, welcher durch Augustus repräsentiert ist, aber der epische Erzählrahmen der Episode, die Ekphrasis von Aeneas’ Schild, betont ihren fiktiven Charakter und hebt die Fluidität der stereotypen Zuschreibung von Fremdheit und Weiblichkeit hervor. In der europäischen Malerei und in Filmen eignete man sich stereotype und orientalisierende Kleopatra-Bilder an. Seit der Neuzeit ist Kleopatra zu einer konstruierten Figur geworden, die häufig im Dienste der orientalistischen Machtdiskurse, des nationalstaatlichen Imperialismus und im letzten Jahrhundert auch der Käuferlenkung steht.","PeriodicalId":221912,"journal":{"name":"Ars & Humanitas","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132161487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
One of the most recognizable thinkers of the 16th century France, Jean Bodin, wrote what is perhaps the first methodological treatise of instructions and guidelines on how to not only read and write but also understand history. With his universal interest in all things human, Bodin predated Marc Bloch’s postulate that historians should ideally be interested in all forms of life if they were to perform their task as dutifully as possible. In 1566 Bodin published one of the most frequently reprinted works, the Methodus ad facilem historiarum cognitionem – “The Method for the Easy Understanding of History”. Although he expressed keen interest and good knowledge of a score of ancient historians, listing them in the fourth chapter of his work (De historicorum delectu – “On the Choice of Historians”), one of them was particularly close to his heart. The Roman historian Gaius Sallustius Crispus who is, according to Bodin, “a most honest author [who] possessed experience of important affairs”, provided Bodin and many of his colleagues with a model (stasis) narrative for discussing a changing world in turmoil – something Bodin was no stranger to in the time of the French religious wars. However, the explanation that it was the rhetorically efficient model narrative that inspired Bodin to copy Sallust’s argument seems unsatisfactory and biographically superficial. Instead, this paper closely analyses the Sallustian chapters that purportedly motivated Bodin’s thinking and proposes that there are little grounds in Sallust for Bodin’s legal and historical framing of absolutist sovereignty.
{"title":"Sallust and Jean Bodin","authors":"Gregor Pobežin","doi":"10.4312/ars.16.1.97-111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4312/ars.16.1.97-111","url":null,"abstract":"One of the most recognizable thinkers of the 16th century France, Jean Bodin, wrote what is perhaps the first methodological treatise of instructions and guidelines on how to not only read and write but also understand history. With his universal interest in all things human, Bodin predated Marc Bloch’s postulate that historians should ideally be interested in all forms of life if they were to perform their task as dutifully as possible. In 1566 Bodin published one of the most frequently reprinted works, the Methodus ad facilem historiarum cognitionem – “The Method for the Easy Understanding of History”. Although he expressed keen interest and good knowledge of a score of ancient historians, listing them in the fourth chapter of his work (De historicorum delectu – “On the Choice of Historians”), one of them was particularly close to his heart. The Roman historian Gaius Sallustius Crispus who is, according to Bodin, “a most honest author [who] possessed experience of important affairs”, provided Bodin and many of his colleagues with a model (stasis) narrative for discussing a changing world in turmoil – something Bodin was no stranger to in the time of the French religious wars. However, the explanation that it was the rhetorically efficient model narrative that inspired Bodin to copy Sallust’s argument seems unsatisfactory and biographically superficial. Instead, this paper closely analyses the Sallustian chapters that purportedly motivated Bodin’s thinking and proposes that there are little grounds in Sallust for Bodin’s legal and historical framing of absolutist sovereignty.","PeriodicalId":221912,"journal":{"name":"Ars & Humanitas","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130658373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：