首页 > 最新文献

Targeted Oncology最新文献

英文 中文
Efficacy and Safety of Docetaxel plus Ramucirumab for Patients with Pretreated Advanced or Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Focus on Older Patients. 多西他赛联合 Ramucirumab 治疗预处理的晚期或复发性非小细胞肺癌患者的疗效和安全性:关注老年患者。
IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-11 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-024-01045-0
Keisuke Onoi, Tadaaki Yamada, Kenji Morimoto, Hayato Kawachi, Rei Tsutsumi, Takayuki Takeda, Asuka Okada, Nobuyo Tamiya, Yusuke Chihara, Shinsuke Shiotsu, Yoshizumi Takemura, Takahiro Yamada, Isao Hasegawa, Yuki Katayama, Masahiro Iwasaku, Shinsaku Tokuda, Koichi Takayama

Background: Combination therapy with docetaxel (DTX) and ramucirumab (RAM) has been used as a second-line treatment for advanced or recurrent lung cancer. However, there is insufficient evidence regarding the safety of angiogenesis inhibitors in older patients.

Objective: This multicenter retrospective study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of second-line treatment regimens in older patients with advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 145 patients aged ≥ 70 years with advanced or recurrent NSCLC treated with second-line chemotherapy after platinum-based therapy between April 1, 2016, and March 31, 2021. Patients were subdivided into the DTX + RAM (n = 38) and single-agent (n = 107) groups.

Results: The median time to treatment failure was 6.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6-9.6) in the DTX + RAM group and 2.3 months (95% CI 1.7-3.0) in the single-agent group (p < 0.01). The median overall survival was 15.9 months (95% CI 12.3-Not Achieved) in the DTX + RAM group and 9.4 months (95% CI 6.9-15.1) in the single-agent group (p = 0.01). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events frequency was not significantly different between the two groups, except for edema. Patients in the DTX + RAM group who did not discontinue treatment owing to adverse events exhibited the most favorable prognosis.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that the DTX + RAM combination is an effective second-line therapy for older patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC, offering favorable efficacy without treatment discontinuation owing to adverse events.

背景:多西他赛(DTX)和拉穆单抗(RAM)联合疗法已被用作晚期或复发性肺癌的二线治疗。然而,有关血管生成抑制剂对老年患者安全性的证据不足:这项多中心回顾性研究旨在调查晚期或复发性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)老年患者二线治疗方案的有效性和安全性:我们回顾性分析了2016年4月1日至2021年3月31日期间145名年龄≥70岁的晚期或复发性NSCLC患者,这些患者在接受铂类治疗后接受了二线化疗。患者被细分为DTX + RAM组(n = 38)和单药组(n = 107):DTX + RAM组治疗失败的中位时间为6.3个月(95%置信区间[CI] 3.6-9.6),单药组治疗失败的中位时间为2.3个月(95%置信区间[CI] 1.7-3.0)(P < 0.01)。DTX+RAM组的中位总生存期为15.9个月(95% CI 12.3-未达标),单药组的中位总生存期为9.4个月(95% CI 6.9-15.1)(P = 0.01)。除水肿外,两组患者发生≥3级不良反应的频率无明显差异。DTX+RAM组患者未因不良反应中断治疗,预后最理想:这些研究结果表明,DTX+RAM联合疗法是老年晚期或复发性NSCLC患者的一种有效的二线疗法,疗效良好,且不会因不良反应而中断治疗。
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Docetaxel plus Ramucirumab for Patients with Pretreated Advanced or Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Focus on Older Patients.","authors":"Keisuke Onoi, Tadaaki Yamada, Kenji Morimoto, Hayato Kawachi, Rei Tsutsumi, Takayuki Takeda, Asuka Okada, Nobuyo Tamiya, Yusuke Chihara, Shinsuke Shiotsu, Yoshizumi Takemura, Takahiro Yamada, Isao Hasegawa, Yuki Katayama, Masahiro Iwasaku, Shinsaku Tokuda, Koichi Takayama","doi":"10.1007/s11523-024-01045-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11523-024-01045-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Combination therapy with docetaxel (DTX) and ramucirumab (RAM) has been used as a second-line treatment for advanced or recurrent lung cancer. However, there is insufficient evidence regarding the safety of angiogenesis inhibitors in older patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of second-line treatment regimens in older patients with advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 145 patients aged ≥ 70 years with advanced or recurrent NSCLC treated with second-line chemotherapy after platinum-based therapy between April 1, 2016, and March 31, 2021. Patients were subdivided into the DTX + RAM (n = 38) and single-agent (n = 107) groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median time to treatment failure was 6.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6-9.6) in the DTX + RAM group and 2.3 months (95% CI 1.7-3.0) in the single-agent group (p < 0.01). The median overall survival was 15.9 months (95% CI 12.3-Not Achieved) in the DTX + RAM group and 9.4 months (95% CI 6.9-15.1) in the single-agent group (p = 0.01). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events frequency was not significantly different between the two groups, except for edema. Patients in the DTX + RAM group who did not discontinue treatment owing to adverse events exhibited the most favorable prognosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that the DTX + RAM combination is an effective second-line therapy for older patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC, offering favorable efficacy without treatment discontinuation owing to adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"411-421"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140102484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Phase 1 Study of Intravenous EGFR-ErbituxEDVsMIT in Children with Solid or CNS Tumours Expressing Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor. 表达表皮生长因子受体的实体瘤或中枢神经系统肿瘤患儿静脉注射表皮生长因子受体-ErbituxEDVsMIT 的 1 期研究。
IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-28 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-024-01051-2
Louise Evans, Rick Walker, Jennifer MacDiarmid, Himanshu Brahmbhatt, Antoinette Anazodo, Geoffrey McCowage, Andrew J Gifford, Maria Kavallaris, Toby Trahair, David S Ziegler

Background: Recurrent or refractory solid and central nervous system (CNS) tumours in paediatric patients have limited treatment options and carry a poor prognosis. The EnGeneIC Dream Vector (EDV) is a novel nanocell designed to deliver cytotoxic medication directly to the tumour. The epidermal growth factor receptor is expressed in several CNS and solid tumours and is the target for bispecific antibodies attached to the EDV.

Objective: To assess the safety and tolerability of EGFR-Erbitux receptor EnGeneIC Dream Vector with mitoxantrone (EEDVsMit) in children with recurrent / refractory solid or CNS tumours expressing EGFR.

Patients and methods: Patients aged 2-21 years with relapsed or refractory CNS and solid tumours, or radiologically diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), were treated in this phase I open-label study of single agent EEDVsMit. Thirty-seven patients' tumours were screened for EGFR expression. EEDVsMit was administered twice weekly in the first cycle and weekly thereafter. Standard dose escalation with a rolling 6 design was employed. Dosing commenced at 5 × 108 EEDVsMit per dose and escalated to 5 × 109 EEDVsMit per dose.

Results: EGFR expression was detected in 12 (32%) of the paediatric tumours tested. Nine patients were enrolled and treated on the trial, including three patients with diffuse midline glioma. Overall, EEDVsMit was well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities observed. The most common drug-related adverse events were grade 1-2 fever, nausea and vomiting, rash, lymphopaenia, and mildly deranged liver function tests. All patients had disease progression, including one patient who achieved a mixed response as the best response.

Conclusions: EGFR-Erbitux receptor targeted EnGeneIC Dream Vector with mitoxantrone can be safely delivered in paediatric patients aged 2-21 years with solid or CNS tumours harbouring EGFR expression. The discovery of EGFR expression in a high proportion of paediatric gliomas means that EGFR may be useful as a target for other treatment strategies. Targeted therapeutic-loaded EDVs may be worth exploring further for their role in stimulating an anti-tumour immune response.

Clinicaltrials:

Gov identifier: NCT02687386.

背景:儿科复发性或难治性实体肿瘤和中枢神经系统(CNS)肿瘤的治疗方案有限,预后较差。EnGeneIC Dream Vector(EDV)是一种新型纳米细胞,可直接向肿瘤输送细胞毒性药物。表皮生长因子受体在多种中枢神经系统肿瘤和实体瘤中都有表达,是EDV上附着的双特异性抗体的靶点:评估表皮生长因子受体-易瑞沙受体EnGeneIC梦幻载体与米托蒽醌(EEDVsMit)在表达表皮生长因子受体的复发性/难治性实体瘤或中枢神经系统肿瘤患儿中的安全性和耐受性:2-21岁的复发性或难治性中枢神经系统实体瘤患者,或经放射学诊断为弥漫性桥脑胶质瘤(DIPG)患者,均接受了单药EEDVsMit的I期开放标签研究。37名患者的肿瘤接受了表皮生长因子受体表达筛查。EEDVsMit在第一周期每周给药两次,此后每周给药一次。采用了滚动6设计的标准剂量递增法。剂量从每剂量 5 × 108 EEDVsMit 开始,逐渐增加到每剂量 5 × 109 EEDVsMit:结果:在12例(32%)接受测试的儿童肿瘤中检测到表皮生长因子受体表达。9名患者参加了试验并接受了治疗,其中包括3名弥漫中线胶质瘤患者。总体而言,EEDVsMit耐受性良好,未发现剂量限制性毒性反应。最常见的药物相关不良反应是1-2级发热、恶心和呕吐、皮疹、淋巴细胞减少以及肝功能检测轻度异常。所有患者均出现疾病进展,其中一名患者的最佳反应为混合反应:EGFR-Erbitux受体靶向EnGeneIC Dream载体与米托蒽醌可安全地用于2-21岁患有表皮生长因子受体表达的实体瘤或中枢神经系统肿瘤的儿童患者。在儿童胶质瘤中发现表皮生长因子受体表达的比例很高,这意味着表皮生长因子受体可以作为其他治疗策略的靶点。有靶向治疗作用的EDV在刺激抗肿瘤免疫反应方面的作用值得进一步探索:Gov 标识符:NCT02687386。
{"title":"A Phase 1 Study of Intravenous EGFR-ErbituxEDVsMIT in Children with Solid or CNS Tumours Expressing Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor.","authors":"Louise Evans, Rick Walker, Jennifer MacDiarmid, Himanshu Brahmbhatt, Antoinette Anazodo, Geoffrey McCowage, Andrew J Gifford, Maria Kavallaris, Toby Trahair, David S Ziegler","doi":"10.1007/s11523-024-01051-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11523-024-01051-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recurrent or refractory solid and central nervous system (CNS) tumours in paediatric patients have limited treatment options and carry a poor prognosis. The EnGeneIC Dream Vector (EDV) is a novel nanocell designed to deliver cytotoxic medication directly to the tumour. The epidermal growth factor receptor is expressed in several CNS and solid tumours and is the target for bispecific antibodies attached to the EDV.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the safety and tolerability of EGFR-Erbitux receptor EnGeneIC Dream Vector with mitoxantrone (<sup>E</sup>EDVs<sub>Mit</sub>) in children with recurrent / refractory solid or CNS tumours expressing EGFR.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients aged 2-21 years with relapsed or refractory CNS and solid tumours, or radiologically diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), were treated in this phase I open-label study of single agent <sup>E</sup>EDVs<sub>Mit</sub>. Thirty-seven patients' tumours were screened for EGFR expression. <sup>E</sup>EDVs<sub>Mit</sub> was administered twice weekly in the first cycle and weekly thereafter. Standard dose escalation with a rolling 6 design was employed. Dosing commenced at 5 × 10<sup>8 E</sup>EDVs<sub>Mit</sub> per dose and escalated to 5 × 10<sup>9 E</sup>EDVs<sub>Mit</sub> per dose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EGFR expression was detected in 12 (32%) of the paediatric tumours tested. Nine patients were enrolled and treated on the trial, including three patients with diffuse midline glioma. Overall, <sup>E</sup>EDVs<sub>Mit</sub> was well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities observed. The most common drug-related adverse events were grade 1-2 fever, nausea and vomiting, rash, lymphopaenia, and mildly deranged liver function tests. All patients had disease progression, including one patient who achieved a mixed response as the best response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EGFR-Erbitux receptor targeted EnGeneIC Dream Vector with mitoxantrone can be safely delivered in paediatric patients aged 2-21 years with solid or CNS tumours harbouring EGFR expression. The discovery of EGFR expression in a high proportion of paediatric gliomas means that EGFR may be useful as a target for other treatment strategies. Targeted therapeutic-loaded EDVs may be worth exploring further for their role in stimulating an anti-tumour immune response.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong></p><p><strong>Gov identifier: </strong>NCT02687386.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"333-342"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11111512/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140319194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Palbociclib in Older Patients with Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review. Palbociclib 在老年晚期/转移性乳腺癌患者中的应用:系统回顾
IF 5.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-28 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-024-01046-z
Etienne Brain, Connie Chen, Sofia Simon, Vinay Pasupuleti, Kathleen Vieira Pfitzer, Karen A Gelmon

Background: Palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy is approved for treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer. In addition to clinical trials, several real-world studies have evaluated the effectiveness of palbociclib. With increased life expectancy in the general population, breast cancer in older women is also expected to increase.

Objective: The aim was to systematically review evidence from both clinical trials and real-world studies for palbociclib treatment outcomes in older patients with HR+/HER2- advanced/metastatic breast cancer (a/mBC). Older patients are often underrepresented in clinical trials, and real-world evidence (RWE) will enrich the analysis of palbociclib outcomes in this subgroup of patients.

Design: A systematic literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library through May 4, 2023, yielded 2355 unique articles. A total of 52 articles (13 and 39 articles reporting results from seven randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 37 RWE studies, respectively) were included based on study eligibility criteria.

Results: All RCTs used age cutoffs of ≥ 65 years to define older population (n = 722; 437 received palbociclib); all RWE studies, except one with an age cutoff of > 60 years, had age cutoffs of ≥ 65 years or higher to define older population (n = 9840; 7408 received palbociclib). Overall, in studies that compared efficacy (progression-free survival [seven RCTs, 20 RWE studies], overall survival [four RCTs, 11 RWE studies], tumor response [three RWE studies], and clinical benefit rate [one RCT, two RWE studies]) and safety outcomes (three RCTs, three RWE studies) between older and younger patients, palbociclib showed similar benefits, regardless of age. Results from two RCTs and two RWE studies showed that global quality of life (QoL) was maintained in older patients receiving palbociclib. Overall, palbociclib dose modifications (two RWE studies), dose reductions (one RCT, seven RWE studies), and treatment discontinuation rates (three RCTs, three RWE studies) were higher in older patients compared with younger patients; however, these differences did not appear to adversely impact efficacy outcomes.

Conclusions: In this systematic review, data from RCTs showed that palbociclib was effective, well tolerated, and maintained QoL in older patients with HR+/HER2- a/mBC. Palbociclib treatment in older patients in real-world settings was associated with similar clinical benefit as in RCTs.

Prospero registration: CRD42023444195.

背景:帕博西尼(Palbociclib)联合内分泌治疗已被批准用于治疗激素受体阳性(HR+)/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HER2-)的晚期乳腺癌。除临床试验外,一些实际研究也对帕博西尼的疗效进行了评估。随着人口预期寿命的延长,预计老年女性患乳腺癌的人数也会增加:目的:系统回顾临床试验和真实世界研究中有关帕博西尼(palbociclib)对HR+/HER2-晚期/转移性乳腺癌(a/mBC)老年患者治疗效果的证据。老年患者在临床试验中的代表性往往不足,而真实世界证据(RWE)将丰富对这一患者亚群的帕博西尼疗效分析:设计:截至 2023 年 5 月 4 日,在 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 中进行了系统性文献检索,共检索到 2355 篇文章。根据研究资格标准,共纳入了 52 篇文章(分别有 13 篇和 39 篇文章报告了 7 项随机对照试验 [RCT] 和 37 项 RWE 研究的结果):所有随机对照试验均以年龄≥65岁为界限来界定老年群体(n = 722;437人接受了palbociclib治疗);所有RWE研究(除一项研究的年龄界限大于60岁外)均以年龄≥65岁或更高为界限来界定老年群体(n = 9840;7408人接受了palbociclib治疗)。总体而言,在比较老年患者和年轻患者疗效(无进展生存期[7项RCT,20项RWE研究]、总生存期[4项RCT,11项RWE研究]、肿瘤反应[3项RWE研究]和临床获益率[1项RCT,2项RWE研究])和安全性结果(3项RCT,3项RWE研究)的研究中,无论年龄如何,palbociclib都显示出相似的获益。两项 RCT 和两项 RWE 研究结果表明,接受帕博西尼治疗的老年患者总体生活质量(QoL)得以维持。总体而言,与年轻患者相比,老年患者的帕博西尼剂量调整率(两项RWE研究)、剂量减少率(一项RCT研究、七项RWE研究)和治疗中止率(三项RCT研究、三项RWE研究)均较高;然而,这些差异似乎并未对疗效结果产生不利影响:在本系统综述中,来自研究性临床试验的数据显示,帕博西尼对HR+/HER2- a/mBC老年患者有效,耐受性良好,并能维持QoL。在现实世界中,老年患者接受帕博西尼(Palbociclib)治疗可获得与RCT相似的临床疗效:CRD42023444195。
{"title":"Palbociclib in Older Patients with Advanced/Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Etienne Brain, Connie Chen, Sofia Simon, Vinay Pasupuleti, Kathleen Vieira Pfitzer, Karen A Gelmon","doi":"10.1007/s11523-024-01046-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11523-024-01046-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palbociclib in combination with endocrine therapy is approved for treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer. In addition to clinical trials, several real-world studies have evaluated the effectiveness of palbociclib. With increased life expectancy in the general population, breast cancer in older women is also expected to increase.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to systematically review evidence from both clinical trials and real-world studies for palbociclib treatment outcomes in older patients with HR+/HER2- advanced/metastatic breast cancer (a/mBC). Older patients are often underrepresented in clinical trials, and real-world evidence (RWE) will enrich the analysis of palbociclib outcomes in this subgroup of patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library through May 4, 2023, yielded 2355 unique articles. A total of 52 articles (13 and 39 articles reporting results from seven randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 37 RWE studies, respectively) were included based on study eligibility criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All RCTs used age cutoffs of ≥ 65 years to define older population (n = 722; 437 received palbociclib); all RWE studies, except one with an age cutoff of > 60 years, had age cutoffs of ≥ 65 years or higher to define older population (n = 9840; 7408 received palbociclib). Overall, in studies that compared efficacy (progression-free survival [seven RCTs, 20 RWE studies], overall survival [four RCTs, 11 RWE studies], tumor response [three RWE studies], and clinical benefit rate [one RCT, two RWE studies]) and safety outcomes (three RCTs, three RWE studies) between older and younger patients, palbociclib showed similar benefits, regardless of age. Results from two RCTs and two RWE studies showed that global quality of life (QoL) was maintained in older patients receiving palbociclib. Overall, palbociclib dose modifications (two RWE studies), dose reductions (one RCT, seven RWE studies), and treatment discontinuation rates (three RCTs, three RWE studies) were higher in older patients compared with younger patients; however, these differences did not appear to adversely impact efficacy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this systematic review, data from RCTs showed that palbociclib was effective, well tolerated, and maintained QoL in older patients with HR+/HER2- a/mBC. Palbociclib treatment in older patients in real-world settings was associated with similar clinical benefit as in RCTs.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration: </strong>CRD42023444195.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"303-320"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11111485/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140319218","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Emerging Toxicities of Antibody-Drug Conjugates for Breast Cancer: Clinical Prioritization of Adverse Events from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. 治疗乳腺癌的抗体药物共轭物的新毒性:FDA不良事件报告系统中不良事件的临床优先排序。
IF 5.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-02 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-024-01058-9
Sara Cecco, Stefano Puligheddu, Michele Fusaroli, Lorenzo Gerratana, Miao Yan, Claudio Zamagni, Fabrizio De Ponti, Emanuel Raschi

Background: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are gaining widespread use in the treatment of breast cancer, although toxicity remains an underexplored issue in the real-world clinical setting. Individual case safety reports collected in large pharmacovigilance databases can advance our knowledge on their safety profile in routine clinical practice.

Objective: We prioritized adverse events (AEs) reported with ADCs approved for breast cancer using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods: We assessed clinical priority of AEs reported in FAERS (February 2013-March 2022) for trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), and sacituzumab govitecan (SG) by attributing a score to each AE disproportionally reported with ADCs. Four criteria were assessed: clinical relevance, reporting rate, reported case fatality rate, and stability of disproportionality signals (consistency of the reporting odds ratio across multiple analyses using three different comparators).

Results: We retained 6589 reports (77.4% referring to T-DM1 as suspect), and 572 AEs generated a disproportionality signal in at least one analysis. The majority of these AEs (62%) were classified as moderate clinical priorities (e.g., interstitial lung disease with T-DXd, thrombocytopenia, peripheral neuropathy with T-DM1, febrile neutropenia, and large intestine perforation with SG). Three AEs emerged as high clinical priorities (6 points): septic shock and neutropenic colitis with SG (N = 8 and 13, with median onset 13 and 10 days, respectively), without co-reported immunosuppressive agents; and pulmonary embolism with T-DM1 (N = 31, median onset 109 days, 52% with reported metastasis).

Conclusion: The heterogeneous spectrum of post-marketing toxicities for ADCs used in breast cancer, as emerging from the FAERS, is largely in line with preapproval evidence. Although causality cannot be proved, we call for increased awareness by oncologists on potential serious unexpected reactions, including early onset of septic shock and neutropenic colitis with SG, and late emergence of pulmonary embolism with T-DM1.

背景:抗体药物共轭物(ADCs)在乳腺癌治疗中的应用越来越广泛,但在实际临床环境中,毒性仍是一个未得到充分探讨的问题。从大型药物警戒数据库中收集的单个病例安全报告可以增进我们对其在常规临床实践中安全性的了解:我们利用食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)对获批治疗乳腺癌的 ADC 报告的不良事件(AEs)进行了优先排序:我们评估了FAERS(2013年2月至2022年3月)中报告的曲妥珠单抗埃坦新(T-DM1)、曲妥珠单抗德鲁司坦(T-DXd)和萨希珠单抗戈维替康(SG)的AEs的临床优先级,为每种ADCs报告的不成比例的AEs打分。我们评估了四项标准:临床相关性、报告率、报告病死率和比例失调信号的稳定性(在使用三种不同比较物进行的多次分析中报告几率的一致性):我们保留了 6589 份报告(77.4% 的报告将 T-DM1 作为可疑病例),其中 572 例 AE 在至少一项分析中产生了比例失调信号。这些AEs中的大多数(62%)被归类为中度临床重点(如T-DXd引起的间质性肺病、血小板减少症、T-DM1引起的周围神经病变、发热性中性粒细胞减少症和SG引起的大肠穿孔)。有三种AE为临床高度优先考虑(6分):使用SG时出现脓毒性休克和中性粒细胞减少性结肠炎(分别为8例和13例,中位发病时间分别为13天和10天),未同时报告免疫抑制剂;使用T-DM1时出现肺栓塞(31例,中位发病时间为109天,52%报告有转移):结论:FAERS 显示,用于乳腺癌的 ADC 药物上市后出现的各种毒性反应与批准前的证据基本一致。虽然无法证明因果关系,但我们呼吁肿瘤学家提高对潜在严重意外反应的认识,包括使用 SG 早期出现的脓毒性休克和中性粒细胞减少性结肠炎,以及使用 T-DM1 晚期出现的肺栓塞。
{"title":"Emerging Toxicities of Antibody-Drug Conjugates for Breast Cancer: Clinical Prioritization of Adverse Events from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.","authors":"Sara Cecco, Stefano Puligheddu, Michele Fusaroli, Lorenzo Gerratana, Miao Yan, Claudio Zamagni, Fabrizio De Ponti, Emanuel Raschi","doi":"10.1007/s11523-024-01058-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11523-024-01058-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are gaining widespread use in the treatment of breast cancer, although toxicity remains an underexplored issue in the real-world clinical setting. Individual case safety reports collected in large pharmacovigilance databases can advance our knowledge on their safety profile in routine clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We prioritized adverse events (AEs) reported with ADCs approved for breast cancer using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed clinical priority of AEs reported in FAERS (February 2013-March 2022) for trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), and sacituzumab govitecan (SG) by attributing a score to each AE disproportionally reported with ADCs. Four criteria were assessed: clinical relevance, reporting rate, reported case fatality rate, and stability of disproportionality signals (consistency of the reporting odds ratio across multiple analyses using three different comparators).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We retained 6589 reports (77.4% referring to T-DM1 as suspect), and 572 AEs generated a disproportionality signal in at least one analysis. The majority of these AEs (62%) were classified as moderate clinical priorities (e.g., interstitial lung disease with T-DXd, thrombocytopenia, peripheral neuropathy with T-DM1, febrile neutropenia, and large intestine perforation with SG). Three AEs emerged as high clinical priorities (6 points): septic shock and neutropenic colitis with SG (N = 8 and 13, with median onset 13 and 10 days, respectively), without co-reported immunosuppressive agents; and pulmonary embolism with T-DM1 (N = 31, median onset 109 days, 52% with reported metastasis).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The heterogeneous spectrum of post-marketing toxicities for ADCs used in breast cancer, as emerging from the FAERS, is largely in line with preapproval evidence. Although causality cannot be proved, we call for increased awareness by oncologists on potential serious unexpected reactions, including early onset of septic shock and neutropenic colitis with SG, and late emergence of pulmonary embolism with T-DM1.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"435-445"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11111510/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140865377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Durable Response to Enfortumab Vedotin Compared to Re-challenging Chemotherapy in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma After Checkpoint Inhibitors. 检查点抑制剂后转移性尿路上皮癌患者对恩福单抗维多汀的持久反应与再次化疗相比
IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-28 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-024-01047-y
Taizo Uchimoto, Shuya Tsuchida, Kazumasa Komura, Wataru Fukuokaya, Takahiro Adachi, Yosuke Hirasawa, Takeshi Hashimoto, Atsuhiko Yoshizawa, Masanobu Saruta, Mamoru Hashimoto, Takuya Higashio, Takuya Matsuda, Kazuki Nishimura, Takuya Tsujino, Ko Nakamura, Tatsuo Fukushima, Kyosuke Nishio, Shutaro Yamamoto, Kosuke Iwatani, Fumihiko Urabe, Keiichiro Mori, Takafumi Yanagisawa, Shunsuke Tsuduki, Kiyoshi Takahara, Teruo Inamoto, Jun Miki, Kazutoshi Fujita, Takahiro Kimura, Yoshio Ohno, Ryoichi Shiroki, Hirotsugu Uemura, Haruhito Azuma

Background: Enfortumab vedotin (EV), an antibody-drug conjugate targeting Nectin-4, has been used for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) after progressing on checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). Re-challenging chemotherapy with platinum agents and continuing CPIs beyond progressive disease (PD) have often been chosen following PD on CPIs, and several studies indicate favorable treatment effects of re-challenging chemotherapy. There is little evidence for comparing EV and re-challenging chemotherapy in real-world clinical practice.

Objective: The aim was to reveal the real-world treatment outcomes of EV, re-challenging chemotherapy, and continuing CPIs beyond PD in mUC patients.

Patients and methods: A multi-institutional dataset of 350 mUC patients treated with CPIs was utilized. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR) were evaluated to compare the treatment arms.

Results: One hundred and nine mUC patients were treated with EV with a median follow-up of 6.4 months. The ORR and disease control rate (DCR) were 48% and 70%, respectively. The OS from PD on pembrolizumab exhibited significant differences among the three groups, with a median OS of 8, 14, and 29 months in continuing pembrolizumab beyond PD, re-challenging chemotherapy, and EV, respectively. When comparing the survival outcomes from the initiation of the treatment, there is neither a difference in OS (p = 0.124), PFS (p = 0.936), nor ORR (p = 0.816) between EV and re-challenging chemotherapy. Notably, the DOR in patients who achieved an objective response was significantly longer in the EV group than the re-challenging chemotherapy group (a median of 11 and 5 months, p = 0.049). For OS, the difference was not statistically significant (27 and 11 months in EV and re-challenging chemotherapy, respectively: p = 0.05).

Conclusions: A superior effect of EV on patient survival compared to re-challenging chemotherapy and continuing pembrolizumab beyond PD was observed in our real-world analysis, which is attributed to the durable DOR in EV treatment despite the similar ORR to re-challenging chemotherapy.

背景:恩福单抗维多汀(EV)是一种靶向Nectin-4的抗体药物共轭物,已被用于治疗使用检查点抑制剂(CPIs)后病情进展的转移性尿路上皮癌(mUC)患者。在使用检查点抑制剂(CPIs)治疗进展期后,患者通常会选择再次使用铂类药物进行化疗,并在疾病进展期(PD)后继续使用CPIs。在实际临床实践中,几乎没有证据可以比较EV和再挑战化疗:目的:揭示EV、再挑战化疗和继续CPIs在mUC患者PD后的实际治疗效果:患者和方法:我们利用了一个包含350名接受CPIs治疗的mUC患者的多机构数据集。对总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、客观反应率(ORR)和反应持续时间(DOR)进行了评估,以比较各治疗方案:结果:109名mUC患者接受了EV治疗,中位随访时间为6.4个月。ORR和疾病控制率(DCR)分别为48%和70%。三组患者从开始使用pembrolizumab起的OS表现出显著差异,PD后继续使用pembrolizumab、重新接受化疗和EV的中位OS分别为8个月、14个月和29个月。在比较治疗开始后的生存结果时,EV组和再次挑战化疗组的OS(p = 0.124)、PFS(p = 0.936)和ORR(p = 0.816)均无差异。值得注意的是,EV组获得客观应答的患者的DOR明显长于再次挑战化疗组(中位数分别为11个月和5个月,p = 0.049)。在OS方面,差异无统计学意义(EV组和再次接受化疗组分别为27个月和11个月:P = 0.05):在我们的真实世界分析中观察到,EV对患者生存期的影响优于重新接受化疗和在PD后继续使用pembrolizumab,这归因于EV治疗的持久DOR,尽管其ORR与重新接受化疗相似。
{"title":"Durable Response to Enfortumab Vedotin Compared to Re-challenging Chemotherapy in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma After Checkpoint Inhibitors.","authors":"Taizo Uchimoto, Shuya Tsuchida, Kazumasa Komura, Wataru Fukuokaya, Takahiro Adachi, Yosuke Hirasawa, Takeshi Hashimoto, Atsuhiko Yoshizawa, Masanobu Saruta, Mamoru Hashimoto, Takuya Higashio, Takuya Matsuda, Kazuki Nishimura, Takuya Tsujino, Ko Nakamura, Tatsuo Fukushima, Kyosuke Nishio, Shutaro Yamamoto, Kosuke Iwatani, Fumihiko Urabe, Keiichiro Mori, Takafumi Yanagisawa, Shunsuke Tsuduki, Kiyoshi Takahara, Teruo Inamoto, Jun Miki, Kazutoshi Fujita, Takahiro Kimura, Yoshio Ohno, Ryoichi Shiroki, Hirotsugu Uemura, Haruhito Azuma","doi":"10.1007/s11523-024-01047-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s11523-024-01047-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enfortumab vedotin (EV), an antibody-drug conjugate targeting Nectin-4, has been used for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) after progressing on checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). Re-challenging chemotherapy with platinum agents and continuing CPIs beyond progressive disease (PD) have often been chosen following PD on CPIs, and several studies indicate favorable treatment effects of re-challenging chemotherapy. There is little evidence for comparing EV and re-challenging chemotherapy in real-world clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to reveal the real-world treatment outcomes of EV, re-challenging chemotherapy, and continuing CPIs beyond PD in mUC patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A multi-institutional dataset of 350 mUC patients treated with CPIs was utilized. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR) were evaluated to compare the treatment arms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and nine mUC patients were treated with EV with a median follow-up of 6.4 months. The ORR and disease control rate (DCR) were 48% and 70%, respectively. The OS from PD on pembrolizumab exhibited significant differences among the three groups, with a median OS of 8, 14, and 29 months in continuing pembrolizumab beyond PD, re-challenging chemotherapy, and EV, respectively. When comparing the survival outcomes from the initiation of the treatment, there is neither a difference in OS (p = 0.124), PFS (p = 0.936), nor ORR (p = 0.816) between EV and re-challenging chemotherapy. Notably, the DOR in patients who achieved an objective response was significantly longer in the EV group than the re-challenging chemotherapy group (a median of 11 and 5 months, p = 0.049). For OS, the difference was not statistically significant (27 and 11 months in EV and re-challenging chemotherapy, respectively: p = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A superior effect of EV on patient survival compared to re-challenging chemotherapy and continuing pembrolizumab beyond PD was observed in our real-world analysis, which is attributed to the durable DOR in EV treatment despite the similar ORR to re-challenging chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"401-410"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140319217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Subcutaneous Envafolimab in dMMR/MSI-H Locally Advanced Colon Cancer 新辅助皮下注射恩伐单抗治疗dMMR/MSI-H局部晚期结肠癌的有效性和安全性
IF 5.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-024-01064-x
Yuan Li, Weili Zhang, Jie Du, Jinlong Hu, Ruixi Hu, Ziyang Zeng, E-er-man-bie-ke Jin-si-han, Shaopu Lian, Hao Wang, Yunfeng Li, Zhizhong Pan, Cheng Feng, Xuan Zhang, Zhenhai Lu

Background

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy with programmed death-ligand 1 blockade for colon cancer, especially for mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) colon cancer, has gained considerable attention recently.

Objective

This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant subcutaneous envafolimab in patients with dMMR/MSI-H locally advanced colon cancer.

Methods

Patients with dMMR/MSI-H locally advanced colon cancer treated with envafolimab at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and Yunnan Cancer Hospital from October 2021 to July 2023 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (CR) rate, and secondary endpoints were treatment-related adverse events and complete clinical response rate.

Results

Overall, 15 patients were analyzed. After neoadjuvant immunotherapy with envafolimab, six patients achieved a CR, with five partial responses, and four stable disease. Three patients achieving a complete clinical response chose to accept a “watch and wait” strategy, and surgery was performed in 12 patients. Postoperative pathology results revealed seven patients achieved pathological CRs, and five patients achieved tumor regression grade 2, with 66.7% of the total CR rate. The most common treatment-related adverse events were pruritus and rash (40%), with no severe cases. No recurrences occurred over a 7.9-month follow-up.

Conclusions

Envafolimab yielded promising surgical outcomes and safety in dMMR/MSI-H locally advanced colon cancer, representing a promising treatment modality for this population.

背景最近,利用程序性死亡配体1阻断治疗结肠癌,尤其是错配修复缺陷(dMMR)/高微卫星不稳定性(MSI-H)结肠癌的新辅助免疫疗法受到了广泛关注。方法回顾性分析2021年10月至2023年7月在中山大学附属肿瘤医院和云南省肿瘤医院接受恩伐单抗治疗的dMMR/MSI-H局部晚期结肠癌患者。主要终点为病理完全反应率(CR),次要终点为治疗相关不良事件和临床完全反应率。在使用恩伐利单抗进行新辅助免疫治疗后,6名患者获得了CR,5名患者获得了部分应答,4名患者病情稳定。3名获得完全临床应答的患者选择了 "观察和等待 "策略,12名患者接受了手术治疗。术后病理结果显示,7 名患者达到病理 CR,5 名患者达到肿瘤消退 2 级,总 CR 率为 66.7%。最常见的治疗相关不良反应是瘙痒和皮疹(40%),没有严重病例。结论恩伐利单抗对dMMR/MSI-H局部晚期结肠癌的手术疗效和安全性很好,是一种很有前景的治疗方式。
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Subcutaneous Envafolimab in dMMR/MSI-H Locally Advanced Colon Cancer","authors":"Yuan Li, Weili Zhang, Jie Du, Jinlong Hu, Ruixi Hu, Ziyang Zeng, E-er-man-bie-ke Jin-si-han, Shaopu Lian, Hao Wang, Yunfeng Li, Zhizhong Pan, Cheng Feng, Xuan Zhang, Zhenhai Lu","doi":"10.1007/s11523-024-01064-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-024-01064-x","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Neoadjuvant immunotherapy with programmed death-ligand 1 blockade for colon cancer, especially for mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) colon cancer, has gained considerable attention recently.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant subcutaneous envafolimab in patients with dMMR/MSI-H locally advanced colon cancer.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Patients with dMMR/MSI-H locally advanced colon cancer treated with envafolimab at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center and Yunnan Cancer Hospital from October 2021 to July 2023 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (CR) rate, and secondary endpoints were treatment-related adverse events and complete clinical response rate.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Overall, 15 patients were analyzed. After neoadjuvant immunotherapy with envafolimab, six patients achieved a CR, with five partial responses, and four stable disease. Three patients achieving a complete clinical response chose to accept a “watch and wait” strategy, and surgery was performed in 12 patients. Postoperative pathology results revealed seven patients achieved pathological CRs, and five patients achieved tumor regression grade 2, with 66.7% of the total CR rate. The most common treatment-related adverse events were pruritus and rash (40%), with no severe cases. No recurrences occurred over a 7.9-month follow-up.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Envafolimab yielded promising surgical outcomes and safety in dMMR/MSI-H locally advanced colon cancer, representing a promising treatment modality for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140834299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adverse Events as Potential Predictive Factors of Activity in Patients with Advanced HCC Treated with Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab 不良事件是阿特珠单抗联合贝伐单抗治疗晚期肝癌患者的潜在活性预测因素
IF 5.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-024-01061-0
Mara Persano, Margherita Rimini, Toshifumi Tada, Goki Suda, Shigeo Shimose, Masatoshi Kudo, Federico Rossari, Changhoon Yoo, Jaekyung Cheon, Fabian Finkelmeier, Ho Yeong Lim, José Presa, Gianluca Masi, Francesca Bergamo, Elisabeth Amadeo, Francesco Vitiello, Takashi Kumada, Naoya Sakamoto, Hideki Iwamoto, Tomoko Aoki, Hong Jae Chon, Vera Himmelsbach, Massimo Alberto Iavarone, Giuseppe Cabibbo, Margarida Montes, Francesco Giuseppe Foschi, Caterina Vivaldi, Caterina Soldà, Takuya Sho, Takashi Niizeki, Naoshi Nishida, Christoph Steup, Mariangela Bruccoleri, Masashi Hirooka, Kazuya Kariyama, Joji Tani, Masanori Atsukawa, Koichi Takaguchi, Ei Itobayashi, Shinya Fukunishi, Kunihiko Tsuji, Toru Ishikawa, Kazuto Tajiri, Hironori Ochi, Satoshi Yasuda, Hidenori Toyoda, Chikara Ogawa, Takashi Nishimura, Takeshi Hatanaka, Satoru Kakizaki, Noritomo Shimada, Kazuhito Kawata, Atsushi Hiraoka, Fujimasa Tada, Hideko Ohama, Kazuhiro Nouso, Asahiro Morishita, Akemi Tsutsui, Takuya Nagano, Norio..

Background

In the context of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with systemic therapy, the correlation between the appearance of adverse events (AEs) and reported efficacy outcomes is well-known and widely investigated. From other pathological settings, we are aware of the prognostic and predictive value of the occurrence of immune-related AEs in patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors.

Objective

This retrospective multicenter real-world study aims to investigate the potential prognostic value of AEs in patients with HCC treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in the first-line setting.

Patients and methods

The study population consisted of 823 patients from five countries (Italy, Germany, Portugal, Japan, and the Republic of Korea).

Results

Of the patients, 73.3% presented at least one AE during the study period. The most common AEs were proteinuria (29.6%), arterial hypertension (27.2%), and fatigue (26.0%). In all, 17.3% of the AEs were grade (G) 3. One death due to bleeding was reported. The multivariate analysis confirmed the appearance of decreased appetite G < 2 [versus G ≥ 2; hazard ratio (HR) 0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13–0.90; p < 0.01] and immunotoxicity G < 2 (versus G ≥ 2; HR: 0.70; 95% CI 0.24–0.99; p = 0.04) as independent prognostic factors for overall survival, and the appearance of decreased appetite G < 2 (versus G ≥ 2; HR: 0.73; 95% CI 0.43–0.95; p = 0.01), diarrhea (yes versus no; HR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.38–0.85; p = 0.01), fatigue (yes versus no; HR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.65–0.95; p < 0.01), arterial hypertension G < 2 (versus G ≥ 2; HR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.52–0.87; p < 0.01), and proteinuria (yes versus no; HR: 0.79, 95% CI 0.64–0.98; p = 0.03) as independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival.

Conclusions

As demonstrated for other therapies, there is also a correlation between the occurrence of AEs and outcomes for patients with HCC for the combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

背景在接受全身治疗的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者中,不良事件(AEs)的出现与所报告的疗效结果之间的相关性是众所周知的,并且得到了广泛的研究。这项回顾性多中心真实世界研究旨在探讨阿特珠单抗联合贝伐单抗一线治疗 HCC 患者的 AEs 的潜在预后价值。结果73.3%的患者在研究期间至少出现过一次AE。最常见的不良反应是蛋白尿(29.6%)、动脉高血压(27.2%)和疲劳(26.0%)。总共有 17.3% 的 AE 为 3 级(G)。多变量分析证实出现了食欲下降 G < 2 [与 G ≥ 2 相比;危险比 (HR) 0.60; 95% 置信区间 (CI) 0.13-0.90; p < 0.01]和免疫毒性 G < 2 (与 G ≥ 2 相比;HR:0.70; 95% CI 0.24-0.99; p = 0.04)为总生存期的独立预后因素,出现食欲下降 G < 2 (versus G ≥ 2; HR: 0.73; 95% CI 0.43-0.95; p = 0.01)、腹泻 (有与无; HR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.85; p = 0.01)、乏力(是与否;HR:0.82,95% CI 0.65-0.95;p <;0.01)、动脉高血压 G <;2(与 G ≥ 2;HR:0.68,95% CI 0.52-0.87;p <;0.01)和蛋白尿(是与否;HR:0.79,95% CI 0.64-0.98;p = 0.结论 正如其他疗法一样,阿特珠单抗联合贝伐珠单抗治疗HCC患者的AEs发生率与预后之间也存在相关性。
{"title":"Adverse Events as Potential Predictive Factors of Activity in Patients with Advanced HCC Treated with Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab","authors":"Mara Persano, Margherita Rimini, Toshifumi Tada, Goki Suda, Shigeo Shimose, Masatoshi Kudo, Federico Rossari, Changhoon Yoo, Jaekyung Cheon, Fabian Finkelmeier, Ho Yeong Lim, José Presa, Gianluca Masi, Francesca Bergamo, Elisabeth Amadeo, Francesco Vitiello, Takashi Kumada, Naoya Sakamoto, Hideki Iwamoto, Tomoko Aoki, Hong Jae Chon, Vera Himmelsbach, Massimo Alberto Iavarone, Giuseppe Cabibbo, Margarida Montes, Francesco Giuseppe Foschi, Caterina Vivaldi, Caterina Soldà, Takuya Sho, Takashi Niizeki, Naoshi Nishida, Christoph Steup, Mariangela Bruccoleri, Masashi Hirooka, Kazuya Kariyama, Joji Tani, Masanori Atsukawa, Koichi Takaguchi, Ei Itobayashi, Shinya Fukunishi, Kunihiko Tsuji, Toru Ishikawa, Kazuto Tajiri, Hironori Ochi, Satoshi Yasuda, Hidenori Toyoda, Chikara Ogawa, Takashi Nishimura, Takeshi Hatanaka, Satoru Kakizaki, Noritomo Shimada, Kazuhito Kawata, Atsushi Hiraoka, Fujimasa Tada, Hideko Ohama, Kazuhiro Nouso, Asahiro Morishita, Akemi Tsutsui, Takuya Nagano, Norio..","doi":"10.1007/s11523-024-01061-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-024-01061-0","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>In the context of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with systemic therapy, the correlation between the appearance of adverse events (AEs) and reported efficacy outcomes is well-known and widely investigated. From other pathological settings, we are aware of the prognostic and predictive value of the occurrence of immune-related AEs in patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>This retrospective multicenter real-world study aims to investigate the potential prognostic value of AEs in patients with HCC treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in the first-line setting.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Patients and methods</h3><p>The study population consisted of 823 patients from five countries (Italy, Germany, Portugal, Japan, and the Republic of Korea).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Of the patients, 73.3% presented at least one AE during the study period. The most common AEs were proteinuria (29.6%), arterial hypertension (27.2%), and fatigue (26.0%). In all, 17.3% of the AEs were grade (G) 3. One death due to bleeding was reported. The multivariate analysis confirmed the appearance of decreased appetite G &lt; 2 [versus G ≥ 2; hazard ratio (HR) 0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13–0.90; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01] and immunotoxicity G &lt; 2 (versus G ≥ 2; HR: 0.70; 95% CI 0.24–0.99; <i>p</i> = 0.04) as independent prognostic factors for overall survival, and the appearance of decreased appetite G &lt; 2 (versus G ≥ 2; HR: 0.73; 95% CI 0.43–0.95; <i>p</i> = 0.01), diarrhea (yes versus no; HR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.38–0.85; <i>p</i> = 0.01), fatigue (yes versus no; HR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.65–0.95; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), arterial hypertension G &lt; 2 (versus G ≥ 2; HR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.52–0.87; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01), and proteinuria (yes versus no; HR: 0.79, 95% CI 0.64–0.98; <i>p</i> = 0.03) as independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>As demonstrated for other therapies, there is also a correlation between the occurrence of AEs and outcomes for patients with HCC for the combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140834300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ASCT2-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugate MEDI7247 in Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Hematological Malignancies: A First-in-Human, Phase 1 Study 成人复发性/难治性血液恶性肿瘤患者的 ASCT2 靶向抗体-药物共轭物 MEDI7247:首次人体1期研究
IF 5.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-29 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-024-01054-z
Michael Maris, Gilles Salles, Won Seog Kim, Tae Min Kim, Roger M. Lyons, Martha Arellano, Reem Karmali, Gary Schiller, Elizabeth Cull, Camille N. Abboud, Connie Batlevi, Ioannis Kagiampakis, Marlon C. Rebelatto, Young Lee, Lyndon C. Kirby, Fujun Wang, John Bothos, Danielle M. Townsley, Amir T. Fathi, Vincent Ribrag

Background

MEDI7247 is a first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of an anti-sodium-dependent alanine-serine-cysteine transporter 2 antibody-conjugated to a pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer.

Objective

This first-in-human phase 1 trial evaluated MEDI7247 in patients with hematological malignancies.

Patients and methods

Adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), multiple myeloma (MM), or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapsed or refractory (R/R) to standard therapies, or for whom no standard therapy exists, were eligible. Primary endpoints were safety and determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary endpoints included assessments of antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity.

Results

As of 26 March 2020, 67 patients were treated (AML: n = 27; MM: n = 18; DLBCL: n = 22). The most common MEDI7247-related adverse events (AEs) were thrombocytopenia (41.8%), neutropenia (35.8%), and anemia (28.4%). The most common treatment-related grade 3/4 AEs were thrombocytopenia (38.8%), neutropenia (34.3%), and anemia (22.4%). Anticancer activity (number of responders/total patients evaluated) was observed in 11/67 (16.4%) patients. No correlation was observed between ASCT2 expression and clinical response. Between-patient variability of systemic exposure of MEDI7247 ADC and total antibody were high (AUCinf geometric CV%: 62.3–134.2, and 74.8–126.1, respectively). SG3199 (PBD dimer) plasma concentrations were below the limit of quantification for all patients after Study Day 8. Anti-drug antibody (ADA) prevalence was 7.7%, ADA incidence was 1.9%, and persistent-positive ADA was 5.8%.

Conclusions

Thrombocytopenia and neutropenia limited repeat dosing. Although limited clinical activity was detected, the dose-escalation phase was stopped early without establishing an MTD.

The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03106428).

背景MEDI7247是一种首创的抗体-药物共轭物(ADC),由抗钠盐依赖性丙氨酸-丝氨酸-半胱氨酸转运体2抗体与吡咯并二氮杂卓二聚体结合而成。患者和方法成人急性髓性白血病(AML)、多发性骨髓瘤(MM)或弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)标准疗法复发或难治(R/R),或无标准疗法者均符合条件。主要终点是安全性和最大耐受剂量(MTD)的确定。次要终点包括抗肿瘤活性、药代动力学(PK)和免疫原性评估。结果截至2020年3月26日,67名患者接受了治疗(AML:n = 27;MM:n = 18;DLBCL:n = 22)。最常见的MEDI7247相关不良事件(AEs)是血小板减少(41.8%)、中性粒细胞减少(35.8%)和贫血(28.4%)。最常见的治疗相关 3/4 级 AE 为血小板减少(38.8%)、中性粒细胞减少(34.3%)和贫血(22.4%)。在11/67(16.4%)例患者中观察到抗癌活性(应答者人数/接受评估的患者总数)。ASCT2的表达与临床反应之间没有相关性。MEDI7247 ADC和总抗体的全身暴露在患者之间的变异性很高(AUCinf几何CV%分别为62.3-134.2和74.8-126.1)。研究第 8 天后,所有患者的 SG3199(PBD 二聚体)血浆浓度均低于定量限。抗药物抗体 (ADA) 发生率为 7.7%,ADA 发生率为 1.9%,ADA 持续阳性率为 5.8%。该研究已在 ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03106428) 登记。
{"title":"ASCT2-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugate MEDI7247 in Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Hematological Malignancies: A First-in-Human, Phase 1 Study","authors":"Michael Maris, Gilles Salles, Won Seog Kim, Tae Min Kim, Roger M. Lyons, Martha Arellano, Reem Karmali, Gary Schiller, Elizabeth Cull, Camille N. Abboud, Connie Batlevi, Ioannis Kagiampakis, Marlon C. Rebelatto, Young Lee, Lyndon C. Kirby, Fujun Wang, John Bothos, Danielle M. Townsley, Amir T. Fathi, Vincent Ribrag","doi":"10.1007/s11523-024-01054-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-024-01054-z","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>MEDI7247 is a first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of an anti-sodium-dependent alanine-serine-cysteine transporter 2 antibody-conjugated to a pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>This first-in-human phase 1 trial evaluated MEDI7247 in patients with hematological malignancies.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Patients and methods</h3><p>Adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), multiple myeloma (MM), or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapsed or refractory (R/R) to standard therapies, or for whom no standard therapy exists, were eligible. Primary endpoints were safety and determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary endpoints included assessments of antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>As of 26 March 2020, 67 patients were treated (AML: <i>n</i> = 27; MM: <i>n</i> = 18; DLBCL: <i>n</i> = 22). The most common MEDI7247-related adverse events (AEs) were thrombocytopenia (41.8%), neutropenia (35.8%), and anemia (28.4%). The most common treatment-related grade 3/4 AEs were thrombocytopenia (38.8%), neutropenia (34.3%), and anemia (22.4%). Anticancer activity (number of responders/total patients evaluated) was observed in 11/67 (16.4%) patients. No correlation was observed between ASCT2 expression and clinical response. Between-patient variability of systemic exposure of MEDI7247 ADC and total antibody were high (AUC<sub>inf</sub> geometric CV%: 62.3–134.2, and 74.8–126.1, respectively). SG3199 (PBD dimer) plasma concentrations were below the limit of quantification for all patients after Study Day 8. Anti-drug antibody (ADA) prevalence was 7.7%, ADA incidence was 1.9%, and persistent-positive ADA was 5.8%.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Thrombocytopenia and neutropenia limited repeat dosing. Although limited clinical activity was detected, the dose-escalation phase was stopped early without establishing an MTD.</p><p>The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03106428).</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140834292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Deciphering the Prognostic Significance of MYD88 and CD79B Mutations in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Insights into Treatment Outcomes 解读弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤中 MYD88 和 CD79B 基因突变的预后意义:洞察治疗结果
IF 5.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-21 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-024-01057-w
Zucheng Xie, Yan Qin, Xinrui Chen, Sheng Yang, Jianliang Yang, Lin Gui, Peng Liu, Xiaohui He, Shengyu Zhou, Changgong Zhang, Le Tang, Yuankai Shi
<h3 data-test="abstract-sub-heading">Background</h3><p>The clinical and genetic characteristics, as well as treatment outcomes, of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with different <i>MYD88</i> and <i>CD79B</i> mutation status merit further investigation.</p><h3 data-test="abstract-sub-heading">Objective</h3><p>This study aims to investigate the distinctions in clinical manifestations, genetic characteristics, and treatment outcomes among <i>MYD88</i>-<i>CD79B</i><sup>co-mut</sup>, <i>MYD88</i>/<i>CD79B</i><sup>single-mut</sup>, and <i>MYD88</i>-<i>CD79B</i><sup>co-wt</sup> DLBCL patients.</p><h3 data-test="abstract-sub-heading">Patients and Methods</h3><p>Clinical and genetic characteristics, along with treatment outcomes among 2696 DLBCL patients bearing <i>MYD88</i>-<i>CD79B</i><sup>co-mut</sup>, <i>MYD88</i>/<i>CD79B</i><sup>single-mut</sup>, and <i>MYD88</i>-<i>CD79B</i><sup>co-wt</sup> treated with R-CHOP/R-CHOP-like regimens from the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College and six external cohorts were analyzed. Potential molecular mechanisms were investigated through Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and xCell methodology.</p><h3 data-test="abstract-sub-heading">Results</h3><p>In the MCD subtype, patients with <i>MYD88</i>-<i>CD79B</i><sup>co-mut</sup> showed comparable progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to <i>MYD88</i>/<i>CD79B</i><sup>single-mut</sup> or <i>MYD88</i>-<i>CD79B</i><sup>co-wt</sup>. However, in the non-MCD subtype, patients with <i>MYD88</i>-<i>CD79B</i><sup>co-mut</sup> exhibited significantly inferior OS than <i>MYD88</i>/<i>CD79B</i><sup>single-mut</sup> or <i>MYD88</i>-<i>CD79B</i><sup>co-wt</sup>, while there was no significant OS difference between <i>MYD88</i>/<i>CD79B</i><sup>single-mut</sup> and <i>MYD88</i>-<i>CD79B</i><sup>co-wt</sup> (median OS: 68.8 [95% CI 22–NA] vs NA [95% CI 112–NA] vs 177.7 [95% CI 159–NA] months; <i>MYD88</i>-<i>CD79B</i><sup>co-mut</sup> vs <i>MYD88</i>/<i>CD79B</i><sup>single-mut</sup>: <i>p </i>= 0.02; <i>MYD88</i>-<i>CD79B</i><sup>co-mut</sup> vs <i>MYD88</i>-<i>CD79B</i><sup>co-wt</sup>: <i>p </i>= 0.03; <i>MYD88</i>/<i>CD79B</i><sup>single-mut</sup> vs <i>MYD88</i>-<i>CD79B</i><sup>co-wt</sup>: <i>p </i>= 0.33). Regarding patients with <i>MYD88</i>-<i>CD79B</i><sup>co-mut</sup>, there was no significant difference in PFS and OS between the MCD and non-MCD subtypes. Within the <i>MYD88</i>-<i>CD79B</i><sup>co-mut</sup> group, patients with <i>PIM1</i><sup>mut</sup> had better PFS than <i>PIM1</i><sup>wt</sup> (median PFS: 8.34 [95% CI 5.56–NA] vs 43.8 [95% CI 26.4–NA] months; <i>p </i>= 0.02). Possible mechanisms contributing to the superior PFS of <i>PIM1</i><sup>mut</sup> patients may include activated lymphocyte-mediated immunity and interferon response, a higher proportion of natural killer T cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells, as well as suppressed angiogenesis and epithelial-mesenchymal t
背景不同MYD88和CD79B突变状态的弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者的临床和遗传特征以及治疗结果值得进一步研究。目的本研究旨在探讨MYD88-CD79Bco-突变、MYD88/CD79Bsingle-突变和MYD88-CD79Bco-wt DLBCL患者的临床表现、遗传特征和治疗结果的差异。患者和方法分析了中国医学科学院肿瘤医院、中国协和医科大学和六个外部队列中2696名接受R-CHOP/R-CHOP类方案治疗的MYD88-CD79Bco-mut、MYD88/CD79Bsingle-mut和MYD88-CD79Bco-wt DLBCL患者的临床和遗传特征以及治疗结果。结果在MCD亚型中,与MYD88/CD79Bsingle-mut或MYD88-CD79Bco-wt相比,MYD88-CD79Bco-mut患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)相当。然而,在非 MCD 亚型中,MYD88-CD79Bco-mut 患者的 OS 明显低于 MYD88/CD79Bsingle-mut 或 MYD88-CD79Bco-wt 患者,而 MYD88/CD79Bsingle-mut 和 MYD88-CD79Bco-wt 患者的 OS 没有显著差异(中位 OS:68.8 [95% CI] [95%CI]):68.8 [95% CI 22-NA] vs NA [95% CI 112-NA] vs 177.7 [95% CI 159-NA] 个月;MYD88-CD79Bco-mut vs MYD88/CD79Bsingle-mut:p = 0.02;MYD88-CD79Bco-mut vs MYD88-CD79Bco-wt:p = 0.03;MYD88/CD79Bsingle-mut vs MYD88-CD79Bco-wt:p = 0.33)。对于MYD88-CD79Bco-mut患者,MCD亚型和非MCD亚型患者的PFS和OS没有显著差异。在MYD88-CD79Bco-mut组中,PIM1mut患者的PFS优于PIM1wt患者(中位PFS:8.34 [95% CI 5.56-NA] vs 43.8 [95% CI 26.4-NA] 个月;P = 0.02)。导致 PIM1mut 患者 PFS 更优的可能机制包括活化的淋巴细胞介导的免疫和干扰素反应、更高比例的自然杀伤 T 细胞和类浆细胞树突状细胞,以及血管生成和上皮-间质转化受到抑制,成纤维细胞和基质评分降低。结论 在MCD亚型中,与MYD88/CD79Bsingle-mut或MYD88-CD79Bco-wt相比,MYD88-CD79Bco-mut患者的PFS和OS相当,而在非MCD亚型中,他们的OS明显较差。在MCD和非MCD亚型中,MYD88-CD79Bco-mut的PFS和OS没有明显差异。MYD88-CD79Bco-突变组中PIM1mut的存在与较好的PFS相关,这可能是免疫过程和肿瘤微环境改变错综复杂的相互作用的结果。
{"title":"Deciphering the Prognostic Significance of MYD88 and CD79B Mutations in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Insights into Treatment Outcomes","authors":"Zucheng Xie, Yan Qin, Xinrui Chen, Sheng Yang, Jianliang Yang, Lin Gui, Peng Liu, Xiaohui He, Shengyu Zhou, Changgong Zhang, Le Tang, Yuankai Shi","doi":"10.1007/s11523-024-01057-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-024-01057-w","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\"&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;The clinical and genetic characteristics, as well as treatment outcomes, of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with different &lt;i&gt;MYD88&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;CD79B&lt;/i&gt; mutation status merit further investigation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\"&gt;Objective&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;This study aims to investigate the distinctions in clinical manifestations, genetic characteristics, and treatment outcomes among &lt;i&gt;MYD88&lt;/i&gt;-&lt;i&gt;CD79B&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;co-mut&lt;/sup&gt;, &lt;i&gt;MYD88&lt;/i&gt;/&lt;i&gt;CD79B&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;single-mut&lt;/sup&gt;, and &lt;i&gt;MYD88&lt;/i&gt;-&lt;i&gt;CD79B&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;co-wt&lt;/sup&gt; DLBCL patients.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\"&gt;Patients and Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;Clinical and genetic characteristics, along with treatment outcomes among 2696 DLBCL patients bearing &lt;i&gt;MYD88&lt;/i&gt;-&lt;i&gt;CD79B&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;co-mut&lt;/sup&gt;, &lt;i&gt;MYD88&lt;/i&gt;/&lt;i&gt;CD79B&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;single-mut&lt;/sup&gt;, and &lt;i&gt;MYD88&lt;/i&gt;-&lt;i&gt;CD79B&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;co-wt&lt;/sup&gt; treated with R-CHOP/R-CHOP-like regimens from the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences &amp; Peking Union Medical College and six external cohorts were analyzed. Potential molecular mechanisms were investigated through Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and xCell methodology.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\"&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the MCD subtype, patients with &lt;i&gt;MYD88&lt;/i&gt;-&lt;i&gt;CD79B&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;co-mut&lt;/sup&gt; showed comparable progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to &lt;i&gt;MYD88&lt;/i&gt;/&lt;i&gt;CD79B&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;single-mut&lt;/sup&gt; or &lt;i&gt;MYD88&lt;/i&gt;-&lt;i&gt;CD79B&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;co-wt&lt;/sup&gt;. However, in the non-MCD subtype, patients with &lt;i&gt;MYD88&lt;/i&gt;-&lt;i&gt;CD79B&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;co-mut&lt;/sup&gt; exhibited significantly inferior OS than &lt;i&gt;MYD88&lt;/i&gt;/&lt;i&gt;CD79B&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;single-mut&lt;/sup&gt; or &lt;i&gt;MYD88&lt;/i&gt;-&lt;i&gt;CD79B&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;co-wt&lt;/sup&gt;, while there was no significant OS difference between &lt;i&gt;MYD88&lt;/i&gt;/&lt;i&gt;CD79B&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;single-mut&lt;/sup&gt; and &lt;i&gt;MYD88&lt;/i&gt;-&lt;i&gt;CD79B&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;co-wt&lt;/sup&gt; (median OS: 68.8 [95% CI 22–NA] vs NA [95% CI 112–NA] vs 177.7 [95% CI 159–NA] months; &lt;i&gt;MYD88&lt;/i&gt;-&lt;i&gt;CD79B&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;co-mut&lt;/sup&gt; vs &lt;i&gt;MYD88&lt;/i&gt;/&lt;i&gt;CD79B&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;single-mut&lt;/sup&gt;: &lt;i&gt;p &lt;/i&gt;= 0.02; &lt;i&gt;MYD88&lt;/i&gt;-&lt;i&gt;CD79B&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;co-mut&lt;/sup&gt; vs &lt;i&gt;MYD88&lt;/i&gt;-&lt;i&gt;CD79B&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;co-wt&lt;/sup&gt;: &lt;i&gt;p &lt;/i&gt;= 0.03; &lt;i&gt;MYD88&lt;/i&gt;/&lt;i&gt;CD79B&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;single-mut&lt;/sup&gt; vs &lt;i&gt;MYD88&lt;/i&gt;-&lt;i&gt;CD79B&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;co-wt&lt;/sup&gt;: &lt;i&gt;p &lt;/i&gt;= 0.33). Regarding patients with &lt;i&gt;MYD88&lt;/i&gt;-&lt;i&gt;CD79B&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;co-mut&lt;/sup&gt;, there was no significant difference in PFS and OS between the MCD and non-MCD subtypes. Within the &lt;i&gt;MYD88&lt;/i&gt;-&lt;i&gt;CD79B&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;co-mut&lt;/sup&gt; group, patients with &lt;i&gt;PIM1&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;mut&lt;/sup&gt; had better PFS than &lt;i&gt;PIM1&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;wt&lt;/sup&gt; (median PFS: 8.34 [95% CI 5.56–NA] vs 43.8 [95% CI 26.4–NA] months; &lt;i&gt;p &lt;/i&gt;= 0.02). Possible mechanisms contributing to the superior PFS of &lt;i&gt;PIM1&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;mut&lt;/sup&gt; patients may include activated lymphocyte-mediated immunity and interferon response, a higher proportion of natural killer T cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells, as well as suppressed angiogenesis and epithelial-mesenchymal t","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140625367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Phase I Trial Evaluating the Addition of Lenalidomide to Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Progressing on Ruxolitinib and Methylprednisolone 一项I期试验,评估向服用鲁索利替尼和甲泼尼龙治疗后病情进展的复发性/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者加用来那度胺的效果
IF 5.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-20 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-024-01049-w
James R. Berenson, Andrea Limon, Stephanie Rice, Tahmineh Safaie, Ralph Boccia, Honghao Yang, Mehdi Moezi, Stephen Lim, Gary Schwartz, Shahrooz Eshaghian, Matthew Brobeck, Regina Swift, Benjamin M. Eades, Sean Bujarski, Yohana Sebhat, Rudra Ray, Susanna Kim, Ashley Del Dosso, Robert Vescio
<h3 data-test="abstract-sub-heading">Background</h3><p>Ruxolitinib (RUX), an orally administered selective Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor, has received approval for the treatment of myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and graft-versus-host disease. We have previously demonstrated the anti-multiple myeloma effects of RUX alone and in combination with the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide (LEN) and glucocorticosteroids both pre-clinically and clinically.</p><h3 data-test="abstract-sub-heading">Objective</h3><p>This study aims to evaluate whether LEN can achieve clinical activity among patients with multiple myeloma progressing on the combination of RUX and methylprednisolone (MP).</p><h3 data-test="abstract-sub-heading">Methods</h3><p>In this part of a phase I, multicenter, open-label study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of RUX and MP for patients with multiple myeloma with progressive disease who had previously received a proteasome inhibitor, LEN, glucocorticosteroids, and at least three prior regimens; we also determined the safety and efficacy of adding LEN at the time of disease progression from the initial doublet treatment. Initially, all subjects received oral RUX 15 mg twice daily and oral MP 40 mg every other day. Those patients who developed progressive disease according to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria then received LEN 10 mg once daily on days 1–21 within a 28-day cycle in addition to RUX and MP, which were administered at the same doses these patients were receiving at the time progressive disease developed.</p><h3 data-test="abstract-sub-heading">Results</h3><p>Twenty-nine subjects (median age 64 years; 18 [62%] male) were enrolled in this part of the study and initially received the two-drug combination of RUX and MP. The median number of prior therapies was six (range 3–12). The overall response rate from this two-drug combination was 31% and the clinical benefit rate was 34%. The best responses were 1 very good partial response, 8 partial responses, 1 minor response, 12 stable disease, and 7 progressive disease. The median progression-free survival was 3.5 months (range 0.5–36.2 months). The median time to response was 3.0 months. The median duration of response was 12.5 months (range 2.8–36.2 months). Twenty (69%) patients who showed progressive disease had LEN added to RUX and MP; all patients had prior exposure to LEN and all but one patient was refractory to their last LEN-containing regimen. After the addition of LEN, the overall response rate was 30% and the clinical benefit rate was 40%. The best responses of patients following the addition of LEN were 2 very good partial responses, 4 partial responses, 2 minor responses, 8 stable disease, and 4 progressive disease. The median time to response was 2.6 months (range 0.7–15.0 months). The median duration of response was not reached. The median progression-free survival following the addition of LEN was 3.5 months (range 0.3–25.9 months).</p><h3 data-test
背景Ruxolitinib(RUX)是一种口服选择性Janus激酶1/2抑制剂,已获准用于治疗骨髓纤维化、真性红细胞增多症和移植物抗宿主病。我们曾在临床前和临床上证实了RUX单独使用以及与免疫调节剂来那度胺(LEN)和糖皮质激素联合使用的抗多发性骨髓瘤效果。本研究旨在评估来那度胺能否在联合使用RUX和甲基强的松龙(MP)的进展期多发性骨髓瘤患者中发挥临床活性。方法在这项I期、多中心、开放标签研究的这一部分,我们评估了RUX和MP对既往接受过蛋白酶体抑制剂、LEN、糖皮质激素和至少三种既往治疗方案的疾病进展期多发性骨髓瘤患者的安全性和有效性;我们还确定了在初始双联治疗后疾病进展时加入LEN的安全性和有效性。最初,所有受试者均接受口服 RUX 15 毫克,每天两次,以及口服 MP 40 毫克,隔天一次。然后,根据国际骨髓瘤工作组的标准,病情进展的患者在28天周期内的第1-21天除了接受RUX和MP治疗外,还接受LEN治疗,每天一次,每次10毫克,剂量与患者病情进展时的剂量相同。之前接受过的治疗次数中位数为 6 次(3-12 次不等)。这种两药联合疗法的总体反应率为31%,临床获益率为34%。最佳反应为1例非常好的部分反应、8例部分反应、1例轻微反应、12例病情稳定和7例病情进展。无进展生存期中位数为3.5个月(0.5-36.2个月)。中位应答时间为 3.0 个月。中位应答持续时间为 12.5 个月(2.8-36.2 个月)。20名(69%)病情进展的患者在RUX和MP基础上加用了LEN;所有患者之前都曾接受过LEN治疗,除一名患者外,其他患者都对上一次含LEN的治疗方案产生了难治性。添加 LEN 后,总体反应率为 30%,临床获益率为 40%。添加 LEN 后,患者的最佳反应为:2 例非常好的部分反应、4 例部分反应、2 例轻微反应、8 例病情稳定和 4 例病情进展。中位应答时间为 2.6 个月(0.7-15.0 个月)。未达到中位应答持续时间。结论对于多发性骨髓瘤患者,RUX和MP治疗有效且耐受性良好,LEN可用于延长这种基于RUX治疗的疗效。
{"title":"A Phase I Trial Evaluating the Addition of Lenalidomide to Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Progressing on Ruxolitinib and Methylprednisolone","authors":"James R. Berenson, Andrea Limon, Stephanie Rice, Tahmineh Safaie, Ralph Boccia, Honghao Yang, Mehdi Moezi, Stephen Lim, Gary Schwartz, Shahrooz Eshaghian, Matthew Brobeck, Regina Swift, Benjamin M. Eades, Sean Bujarski, Yohana Sebhat, Rudra Ray, Susanna Kim, Ashley Del Dosso, Robert Vescio","doi":"10.1007/s11523-024-01049-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-024-01049-w","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\"&gt;Background&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ruxolitinib (RUX), an orally administered selective Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor, has received approval for the treatment of myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and graft-versus-host disease. We have previously demonstrated the anti-multiple myeloma effects of RUX alone and in combination with the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide (LEN) and glucocorticosteroids both pre-clinically and clinically.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\"&gt;Objective&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;This study aims to evaluate whether LEN can achieve clinical activity among patients with multiple myeloma progressing on the combination of RUX and methylprednisolone (MP).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\"&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this part of a phase I, multicenter, open-label study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of RUX and MP for patients with multiple myeloma with progressive disease who had previously received a proteasome inhibitor, LEN, glucocorticosteroids, and at least three prior regimens; we also determined the safety and efficacy of adding LEN at the time of disease progression from the initial doublet treatment. Initially, all subjects received oral RUX 15 mg twice daily and oral MP 40 mg every other day. Those patients who developed progressive disease according to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria then received LEN 10 mg once daily on days 1–21 within a 28-day cycle in addition to RUX and MP, which were administered at the same doses these patients were receiving at the time progressive disease developed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\"&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;Twenty-nine subjects (median age 64 years; 18 [62%] male) were enrolled in this part of the study and initially received the two-drug combination of RUX and MP. The median number of prior therapies was six (range 3–12). The overall response rate from this two-drug combination was 31% and the clinical benefit rate was 34%. The best responses were 1 very good partial response, 8 partial responses, 1 minor response, 12 stable disease, and 7 progressive disease. The median progression-free survival was 3.5 months (range 0.5–36.2 months). The median time to response was 3.0 months. The median duration of response was 12.5 months (range 2.8–36.2 months). Twenty (69%) patients who showed progressive disease had LEN added to RUX and MP; all patients had prior exposure to LEN and all but one patient was refractory to their last LEN-containing regimen. After the addition of LEN, the overall response rate was 30% and the clinical benefit rate was 40%. The best responses of patients following the addition of LEN were 2 very good partial responses, 4 partial responses, 2 minor responses, 8 stable disease, and 4 progressive disease. The median time to response was 2.6 months (range 0.7–15.0 months). The median duration of response was not reached. The median progression-free survival following the addition of LEN was 3.5 months (range 0.3–25.9 months).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 data-test","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140629393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Targeted Oncology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1