Targeted Oncology最新文献

Background: Elranatamab is a BCMA-CD3 bispecific antibody approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Cytokine release syndrome is one of the most common adverse events associated with bispecific antibodies.

Objective: We aimed to determine the optimal elranatamab dosing regimen for mitigating cytokine release syndrome.

Patients and methods: Safety, pharmacokinetics, and exposure-response were analyzed across four clinical studies (MagnetisMM-1, MagnetisMM-2, MagnetisMM-3, and MagnetisMM-9). Different priming regimens evaluated across these studies included a one-step-up dose priming regimen of 44 mg with or without premedication, a two-step-up dose priming regimen of 12 mg on day 1 and 32 mg on day 4 with premedication, and a two-step-up dose priming regimen of 4 mg on day 1 and 20 mg on day 4 with premedication.

Results: The maximum elranatamab serum concentration on day 1 was positively associated with any-grade and grade ≥ 2 cytokine release syndrome. A slower time to maximum serum concentration and a lower dose-normalized maximum serum concentration were observed with subcutaneous versus intravenous administration, supporting subcutaneous dosing to help mitigate cytokine release syndrome.

Conclusions: Based on the incidence, severity, and predictable profile of cytokine release syndrome, the 12/32-mg priming-dose regimen with premedication was determined to be the optimal regimen before the first full dose of 76 mg on day 8.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT03269136, NCT04798586, NCT04649359, and NCT05014412.

Background: Tumour mutational burden (TMB) is an established biomarker for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The optimal TMB cut-off is uncertain. It is also uncertain whether there is a sharp TMB threshold or a more graduated change in clinical outcomes as TMB increases.

Objective: We aimed to determine the relationship between TMB and ICI treatment outcomes using alternative statistical approaches in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods: Tumour mutational burden was evaluated as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in advanced non-small cell lung cancer utilising data from two real-world cohorts of ICI use (n = 968) and three randomised controlled trials evaluating ICIs (n = 1588). The non-linear relationship between continuous TMB and response/survival/efficacy outcomes was evaluated using statistical methods that do not require specifying a TMB cut-off.

Results: Median TMB for all cohorts was seven mutations/megabase, excluding MYSTIC, where the median was 13 mutations/megabase. Progressively higher TMB was significantly associated with a progressively higher objective response rate and progression-free survival in ICI-treated patients in Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets [MSK-IMPACT] (objective response rate: p < 0.001, progression-free survival: p < 0.001), Strata Clinical Molecular Database [SCMD] (progression-free survival: p = 0.023) and OAK/POPLAR (objective response rate: p = 0.017, progression-free survival: p < 0.001) This relationship was not apparent for patients treated with chemotherapy. There was no obvious TMB threshold for ICI response. The relationship between TMB and overall survival was more complex and heterogeneous.

Conclusions: Using a single cut-off to analyse a continuous biomarker may hide important information. Methods that provide more nuance to the underlying relationship between TMB and outcomes enable readers to judge for themselves the value and limitations of TMB cut-offs proposed for clinical practice.

Background: ROS1 chromosomic rearrangement is a rare oncogenic driver, and patients with this rearrangement benefit from specific targeted treatments in the first-line setting. However, therapeutic options are limited in pretreated patients. Brigatinib is a validated drug for ALK rearrangements, and also has an in vitro activity against ROS1. In vivo efficacy is also suggested in some clinical series.

Objective: We aimed to specifically study brigatinib in patients with pretreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 20 centers in France. Brigatinib was delivered through a compassionate use program in France between 2018 and 2020. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints were the objective response rate, overall survival, and tolerance.

Results: Twenty-five patients treated with brigatinib were included in our study. All patients were pretreated, and all of them previously received crizotinib. Median progression-free survival was 3.8 months (95% confidence interval 2.8-7.1). The objective response rate was 32%, with a disease control rate of 48%. Three patients had a prolonged response of more than 18 months at the end of data collection. We did not identify factors predictive of prolonged response. There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities.

Conclusion: Brigatinib may represent an interesting therapeutic option for patients who have progressed after standard treatments.

Background: BERIL-1 was a randomized phase 2 study that studied paclitaxel with either buparlisib, a pan-class I PIK3 inhibitor, or placebo in patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC). Considering the therapeutic paradigm shift with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) now approved in the first-line setting, we present an updated immunogenomic analysis of patients enrolled in BERIL-1, including patients with immune-infiltrated tumors.

Objective: The objective of this study was to identify biomarkers predictive of treatment efficacy in the context of the post-ICI therapeutic landscape.

Patients and methods: Genomic analyses were performed at baseline on tumor and/or plasma circulating DNA (ctDNA) samples, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) studies, including immune infiltration [tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and CD8 expression], were performed on tumor samples. Immunogenomic biomarkers were correlated to overall survival (OS).

Results: Among 158 patients enrolled in BERIL-1, either tumor (53.2%; n = 84) or ctDNA samples (70.8%; n = 112) were available in 85.4% (n = 135). The most commonly mutated genes were TP53 (57.0%), NOTCH1 (23.7%), and PIK3CA (22.2%). In the IHC studies, 98.6% (n = 68/69) of patients were TILs positive in the buparlisib arm versus 94.4% (n = 68/72) in the placebo arm. In patients with TILs-positive tumors, enrichment for clinical benefit on the buparlisib arm was seen in those with PIK3 pathway activation [25.0% (n = 17/68)] with a hazard ratio (HR) for death of 0.43 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21-0.87, p = 0.016]. Similarly, improved OS was seen in patients on the buparlisib arm and NOTCH pathway activation [20.5% (n = 14/68)] with a HR for death of 0.40 (95% CI 0.18-0.90, p = 0.022). Both associations were absent in the placebo group. TP53 and tumor mutational burden (TMB) did not correlate with OS in the buparlisib or placebo arms.

Conclusions: In this immunogenomic analysis of BERIL-1, improved HRs for OS were seen in patients with tumor immune infiltration and selected oncogenic alterations, including PIK3 and NOTCH pathway activation (NCT01852292).

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a wide class of malignancies with dismal prognosis. The therapeutic scenario of metastatic BTCs has profoundly changed during recent years. The combination of cisplatin-gemcitabine plus immunotherapy is currently the gold standard in the first line. The more extensive comprehension of the mechanisms at the basis of BTCs and the identification of several molecular alterations has led to the introduction of target-directed therapies in the second line and beyond that have expanded the therapeutic armamentarium alongside the standard FOLFOX regimen, and for the near future, the results of some trials with targeted therapies in first line are expected. HER2 represents a promising therapeutic target detected in BTCs, being overexpressed in approximately 15-20% of cases, with a strong predilection for gallbladder carcinoma and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, although a small proportion of HER2 overexpression can be detected even in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The efficacy and safety of different HER2 inhibitors have been investigated in several studies in the second line and beyond with encouraging results. This comprehensive review is intended to provide a summary of existing evidence and future perspectives on HER2 altered BTCs.

Bosutinib is a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved for use in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), as well as Ph-positive CP, accelerated phase, or blast phase (with chemotherapy) CML resistant or intolerant to prior therapy. Clinical trials have shown bosutinib is effective as first-line therapy for patients with CML as well as in later lines of therapy after prior TKI failure. Bosutinib has an established safety profile; however, as with all TKIs approved for the treatment of CML, there are adverse events (AEs) that require management. The safety profile of bosutinib is characterized by gastrointestinal, hematological, hepatic, and skin toxicities. Many of these AEs can be managed with dose adjustment strategies. In this podcast, the authors summarize data from some recent bosutinib publications and discuss implications for optimizing bosutinib treatment of patients with CML. Podcast Video (MP4 210846 KB).

Background: The reported benefit of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) maintenance in patients with newly diagnosed and platinum (Pt)-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) included in randomized clinical trials needs to be corroborated in a less selected population.

Objective: The aim is to increase the evidence on niraparib in a real-world setting.

Methods: This is a retrospective observational study including women with platinum-sensitive relapsed high-grade serous OC who started niraparib maintenance between August 2019 (marketing data, Spain) and May 2022. Patients received ≥ 2 previous lines of therapy with complete or partial response to prior chemotherapy. Patient characteristics, niraparib dose, adequacy of dose individualization, effectiveness (progression-free survival [PFS] and overall survival), safety, and economic savings with an individualized starting dose (ISD) strategy were assessed.

Results: The study included 217 patients with a median of 8.9 months of niraparib duration: breast cancer gene (BRCA) wild-type OC, 70%; two prior treatment lines, 49%; Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports (RADAR) criteria, 82% (receiving mainly 200 mg of niraparib, 79%). Median PFS was 10.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.4-14.8) without statistically significant differences based on starting dose strategy, contrary to what was observed on the basis of prior lines, response to prior chemotherapy, BRCA mutational status, and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage at diagnosis. The last three variables also showed a statistically significant predictive prognostic value for effectiveness. Dose interruptions due to toxicity were required in 7% of patients, and dose adjustments in 56% were mainly due to hematologic toxicities. The actual dose of niraparib reveals economic savings versus the theoretical cost.

Conclusion: This large real-world analysis corroborates the tolerability and activity of niraparib maintenance for platinum-sensitive recurrent OC and economic savings.

Background: Stem cell transplantation (SCT) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are both used in the treatment of hematological malignancies. There may be an overlap in patient exposure to both treatments. Theoretically, ICIs potentiate the graft-versus-tumor effect following SCT but may increase the risk of inflammatory adverse events (AEs). Conversely, immunosuppression following SCT may decrease the risk of immune-mediated AEs.

Objectives: We aimed to explore the effect of immunotherapy on the risk and severity of inflammatory AEs following SCT.

Patients and methods: We performed a single-center, retrospective chart review that included all patients with a hematological malignancy treated with immunotherapy and who received SCT. Patients who did not receive immunosuppressive regimens after their transplant (e.g., autologous transplants) were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups based on ICI timing: pre-SCT ICI (group 1) and post-SCT ICI (group 2).

Results: A total of 63 patients were included. Around 82% of patients in group 1 experienced a post-transplant AE compared with 50% in group 2 (p = 0.014). These AEs occurred earlier in group 1 patients (median 57 days in group 1 versus 195 in group 2; p = 0.007). Roughly 80% of the inflammatory conditions involved the gastrointestinal system. Severity and complication rates did not differ between groups, but gastrointestinal inflammation in group 1 was more likely to require immunosuppressive medication (75.7% and 37.8% requiring corticosteroids and selective immunosuppressive therapy, respectively, in group 1 patients versus 33.3% and 0% in group 2 patients; p < 0.05).

Conclusion: To our knowledge, our study is one of few exploring the impact of ICI timing in relation to SCT on the risk of post-SCT inflammatory AEs. Administration of immunotherapy prior to SCT may predispose patients to inflammatory AEs after SCT, which may occur earlier and last longer than if ICIs are started after SCT. Future studies are needed to further explore this phenomenon.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a bone-marrow-based cancer of plasma cells. Over the last 2 decades, marked treatment advances have led to improvements in the overall survival (OS) of patients with this disease. Key developments include the use of chemotherapy, immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies. MM remains incurable, with outcomes influenced by many factors, including age, sex, genetics, and treatment response. This review summarizes recent studies regarding monitoring and treatment of MM, emphasizing the efficacy of new therapies, the impact of maintenance treatments, and approaches for managing relapsed or refractory MM. The role of specific drug classes used to treat MM, including immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and newer treatments such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies and bispecific antibodies are discussed. Combination therapies have significantly improved outcomes. Maintenance therapies, particularly with lenalidomide, have been effective in extending OS but lead to an increased risk of secondary cancers. Venetoclax, selinexor, and ruxolitinib have shown potential as new therapeutic options for patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Immune-based treatments, such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies, mark a major advancement for heavily pretreated patients, although challenges remain related to cost, availability, and side effects. The treatment landscape for patients with MM has seen significant progress, with current therapies providing a longer OS and better quality of life. Future research should focus on optimizing these strategies, personalizing therapies, and exploring new therapeutic targets.