Pub Date : 2020-12-07DOI: 10.55269/eurcrossrd.2.010510007
Meifeng Ng, Wong Flora Jia Li, Yeung Chan, K. Sharov
Once Mr Lee Kuan Yew, Founding father of the modern State of Singapore, offered the Singapore’s political experience to Vladimir Putin during their meeting. He was not heard and Putin claimed that Russia must have its own way in Eurasia, dissimilar with the Singapore’s one. Almost twenty years have passed since those times. Russian political elites did not opt to learn anything from the Singapore’s socio-political experience. Now Russia faces the situation to be disregarded as a Eurasian power and thrown at the border of new Eurasian communication routes withal. An analysis of possibilities to use Singapore’s rich legal and cultural achievements in the modern socio-political Russian realities, is proposed in the paper.
{"title":"Unobvious and Hidden Parallels in Eurasian Legal and Cultural Space: Can Singaporean Experience Be Used in Russia?","authors":"Meifeng Ng, Wong Flora Jia Li, Yeung Chan, K. Sharov","doi":"10.55269/eurcrossrd.2.010510007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55269/eurcrossrd.2.010510007","url":null,"abstract":"Once Mr Lee Kuan Yew, Founding father of the modern State of Singapore, offered the Singapore’s political experience to Vladimir Putin during their meeting. He was not heard and Putin claimed that Russia must have its own way in Eurasia, dissimilar with the Singapore’s one. Almost twenty years have passed since those times. Russian political elites did not opt to learn anything from the Singapore’s socio-political experience. Now Russia faces the situation to be disregarded as a Eurasian power and thrown at the border of new Eurasian communication routes withal. An analysis of possibilities to use Singapore’s rich legal and cultural achievements in the modern socio-political Russian realities, is proposed in the paper.","PeriodicalId":222421,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Crossroads","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115645188","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-12-03DOI: 10.55269/eurcrossrd.2.010310124
V. Moskovkin
In the article, I investigate the role of prosaic oeuvres and memoirs of the famous but now forgotten Yalta-born writer, public figure and teacher of Jewish origin Mikhail Josifovich Vygon (1924-2011), in the reconstruction of the Jewish genocide in Crimea by Nazi criminals during the Great Patriotic War, as well as the later political oppression of Jews in the Soviet Union. An especial attention is paid to Vygon’s testimony of atrocities of the Russians and Ukrainians to the Jews during the German occupation of Crimea. As a result of studying the unpublished works of Vygon, I conclude that the Yalta writer was pessimistic about the future fate of the Jews in Eurasia. Only the formation of the State of Israel in 1948, according to Vygon, where he emigrated in 1991 after the collapse of the Soviet Union, put an end to the almost universal political, cultural and social persecution of the Jewish nation in Eurasia.
{"title":"A Jew’s Fate in Eurasian Space: Between Hatred and Misunderstanding. Role of Mikhail Vygon‘s Legacy in Understanding Persecution of Jews in Crimea in Twentieth Century","authors":"V. Moskovkin","doi":"10.55269/eurcrossrd.2.010310124","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55269/eurcrossrd.2.010310124","url":null,"abstract":"In the article, I investigate the role of prosaic oeuvres and memoirs of the famous but now forgotten Yalta-born writer, public figure and teacher of Jewish origin Mikhail Josifovich Vygon (1924-2011), in the reconstruction of the Jewish genocide in Crimea by Nazi criminals during the Great Patriotic War, as well as the later political oppression of Jews in the Soviet Union. An especial attention is paid to Vygon’s testimony of atrocities of the Russians and Ukrainians to the Jews during the German occupation of Crimea. As a result of studying the unpublished works of Vygon, I conclude that the Yalta writer was pessimistic about the future fate of the Jews in Eurasia. Only the formation of the State of Israel in 1948, according to Vygon, where he emigrated in 1991 after the collapse of the Soviet Union, put an end to the almost universal political, cultural and social persecution of the Jewish nation in Eurasia.","PeriodicalId":222421,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Crossroads","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131242346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-11-27DOI: 10.55269/eurcrossrd.2.010210217
W. Sassin
The novel coronavirus triggered but not forced the end of globalisation in Eurasian space. During the last thirty years, the main task of almost all Eurasian politicians was “to make the world a better place,” in order that “the world should be saved.” Excessive level of globalisation used to achieve the goal of “saving” the world in the last decades led to a queer situation. A new member of the known coronavirus family reveals that the affluent European society, equipped with all kinds of social facilities, can only defend itself against the “intruder” with means that would otherwise be taken only in "times of need." The "reconstruction programmes" to which Eurasian governments have now committed their citizens in order to compensate for civil lockdowns and economic shutdowns will hardly have any effect at all in overcoming a longer-term economic depression. The corona crisis suddenly highlighted what globalisation and digitalisation have accumulated in the form of long-term and exponentially increasing risks and problems by overcoming practically every kind of natural border in Eurasian space. The only remaining solution is to give more space to diversity instead of unity and to fight for a well-defined co-existence instead of a general coexistence in Eurasia.
{"title":"Community, its Origins and its Limits: A Eurasian Perspective","authors":"W. Sassin","doi":"10.55269/eurcrossrd.2.010210217","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55269/eurcrossrd.2.010210217","url":null,"abstract":"The novel coronavirus triggered but not forced the end of globalisation in Eurasian space. During the last thirty years, the main task of almost all Eurasian politicians was “to make the world a better place,” in order that “the world should be saved.” Excessive level of globalisation used to achieve the goal of “saving” the world in the last decades led to a queer situation. A new member of the known coronavirus family reveals that the affluent European society, equipped with all kinds of social facilities, can only defend itself against the “intruder” with means that would otherwise be taken only in \"times of need.\" The \"reconstruction programmes\" to which Eurasian governments have now committed their citizens in order to compensate for civil lockdowns and economic shutdowns will hardly have any effect at all in overcoming a longer-term economic depression. The corona crisis suddenly highlighted what globalisation and digitalisation have accumulated in the form of long-term and exponentially increasing risks and problems by overcoming practically every kind of natural border in Eurasian space. The only remaining solution is to give more space to diversity instead of unity and to fight for a well-defined co-existence instead of a general coexistence in Eurasia.","PeriodicalId":222421,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Crossroads","volume":"3 14-15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116825351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-11-25DOI: 10.55269/eurcrossrd.1.020510005
S. Komissarov, C. Tang, A. Soloviev, M. Kudinova
We communicate our archaeological findings made in several burial complexes along the ancient Silk Road along with the analysis of the recent discoveries of other teams. Our research proves the special role of the Silk Road in Eurasian economic and political mutual influence, communication and transmission since Western Han dynasty. Sogdian and Middle East influence on Chinese culture was substantial and its importance cannot be underestimated. But even more importantly, during Tang dynasty, Europeans and Northern Eurasian representatives also influenced Chinese society and culture strongly, with some of them serving at the Chinese imperial court. Our findings are even more important in the context of the New Silk Road initiative announced recently by Xi Jinping (“One Belt, One Road”).
{"title":"Silk Road as a Space of Eurasian Cultural Communication and Transmission","authors":"S. Komissarov, C. Tang, A. Soloviev, M. Kudinova","doi":"10.55269/eurcrossrd.1.020510005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55269/eurcrossrd.1.020510005","url":null,"abstract":"We communicate our archaeological findings made in several burial complexes along the ancient Silk Road along with the analysis of the recent discoveries of other teams. Our research proves the special role of the Silk Road in Eurasian economic and political mutual influence, communication and transmission since Western Han dynasty. Sogdian and Middle East influence on Chinese culture was substantial and its importance cannot be underestimated. But even more importantly, during Tang dynasty, Europeans and Northern Eurasian representatives also influenced Chinese society and culture strongly, with some of them serving at the Chinese imperial court. Our findings are even more important in the context of the New Silk Road initiative announced recently by Xi Jinping (“One Belt, One Road”).","PeriodicalId":222421,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Crossroads","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123240043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-20DOI: 10.55269/eurcrossrd.1.020210220
Frank Suoquin
The Second World War, the first war ever that could only be waged on a truly global scale due to technical progress and not due to a new dimension of aggressiveness or conquest, it brought forth the NEW WORLD with forces and possibilities that upgraded a few to “gods" and degraded the remainder of homo sapiens to “simple human beings,” regardless of whether they consider themselves free or exploited, i.e. slaves who have to feed or even protect others by risking their lives. After the end of World War II, Germany was "domesticated" by the Allies, just as an evolutionary unit is normally suppressed by those species that are "better suited" in the natural selection process. In the article, I use an evolutionary approach to correctly classify the work "Finis Germaniae" published in the current issue and to illustrate Germany's transformation within Eurasia as a social "species" subject to evolution.
{"title":"In Search for the Essence of Evolution. Post-War Germany, USA and European Union as Examples of the Transformation of homo sapiens to the Next Stage of Evolution","authors":"Frank Suoquin","doi":"10.55269/eurcrossrd.1.020210220","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55269/eurcrossrd.1.020210220","url":null,"abstract":"The Second World War, the first war ever that could only be waged on a truly global scale due to technical progress and not due to a new dimension of aggressiveness or conquest, it brought forth the NEW WORLD with forces and possibilities that upgraded a few to “gods\" and degraded the remainder of homo sapiens to “simple human beings,” regardless of whether they consider themselves free or exploited, i.e. slaves who have to feed or even protect others by risking their lives. After the end of World War II, Germany was \"domesticated\" by the Allies, just as an evolutionary unit is normally suppressed by those species that are \"better suited\" in the natural selection process. In the article, I use an evolutionary approach to correctly classify the work \"Finis Germaniae\" published in the current issue and to illustrate Germany's transformation within Eurasia as a social \"species\" subject to evolution.","PeriodicalId":222421,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Crossroads","volume":"164 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128549201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-18DOI: 10.55269/eurcrossrd.1.020110201
Rolf Dieter Lehner
In the article, I am focussing on the connection between consequences of World War II and the current Germany’s rapidly worsening status quo in Eurasia. I evince that current internal and external destabilising Germany is closely linked to the post-war order. Opening and thorough investigation of the war-time documents without ideological taboos and blinkers may significantly improve the chances of Germany to find an appropriate place in drastically changing Europe and Eurasia, and not to demise as a state, nation, culture and world power.
{"title":"Finis Germaniae, or “Woe to the Conquered”","authors":"Rolf Dieter Lehner","doi":"10.55269/eurcrossrd.1.020110201","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55269/eurcrossrd.1.020110201","url":null,"abstract":"In the article, I am focussing on the connection between consequences of World War II and the current Germany’s rapidly worsening status quo in Eurasia. I evince that current internal and external destabilising Germany is closely linked to the post-war order. Opening and thorough investigation of the war-time documents without ideological taboos and blinkers may significantly improve the chances of Germany to find an appropriate place in drastically changing Europe and Eurasia, and not to demise as a state, nation, culture and world power.","PeriodicalId":222421,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Crossroads","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126597399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-07-14DOI: 10.55269/eurcrossrd.1.020410005
Alexandr Gnes
National and ethnic archetype that is being carved in tales, folklore, and epos for centuries, is a key to understanding imagology as a set of images and notions about a culture or nationality. In Eurasia, gradual evolution of archetypes of different peoples was overthrown by World War I, which created new peoples, new borders and new nations. In the article, on the basis of studying Magyar national archetype and its relationships with other Eurasian archetypes, mainly Germanic and Turan, we are outlining a hypothesis that a clear delineation “our own – foreign” that would defy the globalisation, is a necessary prerequisite for the sustainable and productive coexistence of Eurasian cultures and nationalities and an important condition of Eurasia’s future development.
{"title":"Eurasian Images, Archetypes and Mirages: Vectors from Ancient Times to Nowadays","authors":"Alexandr Gnes","doi":"10.55269/eurcrossrd.1.020410005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55269/eurcrossrd.1.020410005","url":null,"abstract":"National and ethnic archetype that is being carved in tales, folklore, and epos for centuries, is a key to understanding imagology as a set of images and notions about a culture or nationality. In Eurasia, gradual evolution of archetypes of different peoples was overthrown by World War I, which created new peoples, new borders and new nations. In the article, on the basis of studying Magyar national archetype and its relationships with other Eurasian archetypes, mainly Germanic and Turan, we are outlining a hypothesis that a clear delineation “our own – foreign” that would defy the globalisation, is a necessary prerequisite for the sustainable and productive coexistence of Eurasian cultures and nationalities and an important condition of Eurasia’s future development.","PeriodicalId":222421,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Crossroads","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129534132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-07-02DOI: 10.55269/eurcrossrd.1.010410216
W. Sassin
After the coronavirus crisis, a so-called Reconstruction Program of the European Union was adopted, initiated by French President Macron and German Chancellor Merkel. It is intended to counteract the far-reaching consequences of the extensive economic and social isolation in the face of COVID-19. However, Corona has undoubtedly been and will continue to be a catalyst that accelerates the inevitable transformation of what we call modern global and universal civilization, whether within the borders of the Eurasian area or beyond. The article examines why, in general, investments in global climate protection or in programs for the comprehensive digitalization of the planet, which is also the aim of the reconstruction program of the EU, will not eliminate the obvious structural distortions in the Eurasian economy caused by the acting individuals of the first two decades of the 21st century.
{"title":"The Limits of Economics: Globalization - From a Cornucopia to a Goblet of Poison?","authors":"W. Sassin","doi":"10.55269/eurcrossrd.1.010410216","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55269/eurcrossrd.1.010410216","url":null,"abstract":"After the coronavirus crisis, a so-called Reconstruction Program of the European Union was adopted, initiated by French President Macron and German Chancellor Merkel. It is intended to counteract the far-reaching consequences of the extensive economic and social isolation in the face of COVID-19. However, Corona has undoubtedly been and will continue to be a catalyst that accelerates the inevitable transformation of what we call modern global and universal civilization, whether within the borders of the Eurasian area or beyond. The article examines why, in general, investments in global climate protection or in programs for the comprehensive digitalization of the planet, which is also the aim of the reconstruction program of the EU, will not eliminate the obvious structural distortions in the Eurasian economy caused by the acting individuals of the first two decades of the 21st century.","PeriodicalId":222421,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Crossroads","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131935352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-21DOI: 10.55269/eurcrossrd.1.010310006
Igor Likhomanov
Siberian regionalism movement is discussed in the paper in relation to classical Eurasianism of the 1920s. the political differences between Siberian regionalism and Eurasianism were by no means accidental. They were a consequence of deep theoretical differences. The Siberian regional concept was based on the idea of Siberia as a separate economic and geographical region, completely different in its natural and climatic conditions from the European part of Russia. The regionalists focussed on the geographical originality of Russian Siberia, as well as its remoteness and isolation from the “metropolitan state” in geographic and economic terms. All this fundamentally contradicted the “Eurasian geography,” which as persistently smoothed out the geographical space of Russia, trying to present it more homogeneous than it really was. The mental maps of the regionalists and Eurasians did not coincide on the basic level: they both saw the geographic space of Russia in different ways, just as they perceived the structure of its economy. The analysis performed in the article may help to evaluate ideological foundations of modern Eurasian political blocks and alliances as well as Eurasian international legal initiatives.
{"title":"Siberian Regionalism and Eurasianism: Complicated Relationships","authors":"Igor Likhomanov","doi":"10.55269/eurcrossrd.1.010310006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55269/eurcrossrd.1.010310006","url":null,"abstract":"Siberian regionalism movement is discussed in the paper in relation to classical Eurasianism of the 1920s. the political differences between Siberian regionalism and Eurasianism were by no means accidental. They were a consequence of deep theoretical differences. The Siberian regional concept was based on the idea of Siberia as a separate economic and geographical region, completely different in its natural and climatic conditions from the European part of Russia. The regionalists focussed on the geographical originality of Russian Siberia, as well as its remoteness and isolation from the “metropolitan state” in geographic and economic terms. All this fundamentally contradicted the “Eurasian geography,” which as persistently smoothed out the geographical space of Russia, trying to present it more homogeneous than it really was. The mental maps of the regionalists and Eurasians did not coincide on the basic level: they both saw the geographic space of Russia in different ways, just as they perceived the structure of its economy. The analysis performed in the article may help to evaluate ideological foundations of modern Eurasian political blocks and alliances as well as Eurasian international legal initiatives.","PeriodicalId":222421,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Crossroads","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132455973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-13DOI: 10.55269/eurcrossrd.1.010510013
K. Sharov, Lucille Dupont
Extimity as a socio-psychological phenomenon that was created and matured in European political discourse and social programmes, during the last ten-fifteen years became a product of exportation from European Union to the whole of Eurasia. It is widely depicted by media and many politicians as a part of the worldwide gender equality movement, but in fact it represents a political means of pre-designed formation, attribution, consolidation and transformation of gender social roles and statuses in Eurasia. Such use of extimity is performed according to common mould that presumably reflects a centripetal force which has to additionally unify Eurasian population across a common idea shared by the majority, ultimately the idea of the global unified humanity. In the instrumental aspect, extimity is associated with the re-transmission of neo-liberal gender communicative stereotypes and behaviour models in non-European parts of Eurasia. In the paper, we analyse social and political implications and consequences of such extimity exportation from EU to the rest of Eurasia.
{"title":"Europeanising Eurasia beyond the Boundaries of European Union: Extimity in Gender as an Export Product","authors":"K. Sharov, Lucille Dupont","doi":"10.55269/eurcrossrd.1.010510013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.55269/eurcrossrd.1.010510013","url":null,"abstract":"Extimity as a socio-psychological phenomenon that was created and matured in European political discourse and social programmes, during the last ten-fifteen years became a product of exportation from European Union to the whole of Eurasia. It is widely depicted by media and many politicians as a part of the worldwide gender equality movement, but in fact it represents a political means of pre-designed formation, attribution, consolidation and transformation of gender social roles and statuses in Eurasia. Such use of extimity is performed according to common mould that presumably reflects a centripetal force which has to additionally unify Eurasian population across a common idea shared by the majority, ultimately the idea of the global unified humanity. In the instrumental aspect, extimity is associated with the re-transmission of neo-liberal gender communicative stereotypes and behaviour models in non-European parts of Eurasia. In the paper, we analyse social and political implications and consequences of such extimity exportation from EU to the rest of Eurasia.","PeriodicalId":222421,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Crossroads","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134460426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：