{"title":"Comment (Case 3779) – Petalodus hastingsii Owen 1840–1845 (Chondrichthyes, Petalodontiformes, Petalodontidae): proposed conservation of usage by designation of a neotype","authors":"K. Carpenter, W. Itano","doi":"10.21805/bzn.v78.a031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v78.a031","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22414,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84244444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract. The purpose of this application, under Article 55.3.1 of the Code, is to remove the homonymy between the family-group names Microcentrini Deitz, 1975 (type genus Microcentrus Stål, 1869) (Insecta, Hemiptera, Membracidae) and Microcentrini Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1878 (type genus Microcentrum Scudder, 1862) (Insecta, Orthoptera, Phaneropteridae), by emending of the former to Microcentrusini Deitz, 1975. These two family-group names are based on similar but not identical type-genus names. It is proposed herein that the entire generic name Microcentrus be adopted as the grammatical stem, so the family-group name of Deitz (1975) will become Microcentrusini, thus resolving the homonymy.
{"title":"Case 3846 –Microcentrini Deitz, 1975 (Insecta, Hemiptera, Membracidae): proposed emendation of spelling to Microcentrusini to remove homonymy with Microcentrini Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1878 (Insecta, Orthoptera, Phaneropteridae)","authors":"L. Deitz, J. Cryan","doi":"10.21805/bzn.v78.a025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v78.a025","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The purpose of this application, under Article 55.3.1 of the Code, is to remove the homonymy between the family-group names Microcentrini Deitz, 1975 (type genus Microcentrus Stål, 1869) (Insecta, Hemiptera, Membracidae) and Microcentrini Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1878 (type genus Microcentrum Scudder, 1862) (Insecta, Orthoptera, Phaneropteridae), by emending of the former to Microcentrusini Deitz, 1975. These two family-group names are based on similar but not identical type-genus names. It is proposed herein that the entire generic name Microcentrus be adopted as the grammatical stem, so the family-group name of Deitz (1975) will become Microcentrusini, thus resolving the homonymy.","PeriodicalId":22414,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82095975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Comment (Case 3709) – Additional comments on the proposed conservation of names for western North American Hesperia comma-group subspecies through designation of neotypes","authors":"J. Calhoun, Q. Cong, N. Grishin, A. Warren","doi":"10.21805/bzn.v78.a028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v78.a028","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22414,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89798505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
International Commission onZoological Nomenclature
Abstract. The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature has conserved current usage of the generic name Stylina Lamarck, 1816 by designating a type species, Stylina insignis Fromentel, 1861, as well as a lectotype for the species.
{"title":"Opinion 2478 (Case 3771) – Stylina Lamarck, 1816 (Coelenterata, Scleractinia): current usage conserved by designation of a type species and corresponding lectotype","authors":"International Commission onZoological Nomenclature","doi":"10.21805/bzn.v78.a035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v78.a035","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature has conserved current usage of the generic name Stylina Lamarck, 1816 by designating a type species, Stylina insignis Fromentel, 1861, as well as a lectotype for the species.","PeriodicalId":22414,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80735790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Notice of New Applications to the Commission (Case 3853–3857)","authors":"","doi":"10.21805/bzn.v78.a022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v78.a022","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22414,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77888209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Opinion 2476 (Case 3748) – Bothriembryon Pilsbry, 1894 (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Bothriembryontidae): name conserved by designation of Helix melo Quoy & Gaimard, 1832 as the type species of Liparus Albers, 1850","authors":"","doi":"10.21805/bzn.v78.a033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v78.a033","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22414,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83158826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In the most recent European checklist of butterflies (Wiemers et al., 2018) there was agreement among the 12 co-authors (from 11 different countries) to keep the name Parnassius phoebus (Fabricius, 1793) until the case has been decided by the commission, because this name has been used continuously during the past 150 years whereas the name Parnassius corybas Fischer von Waldheim, 1823 never has until by Hanus & Theye (2010, 2011). Korb (2020a) in his opposing comment argues that many papers and websites already use the name Parnassius corybas but compared to the many recent works that have continued to use the name Parnassius phoebus (e.g. Hiermann et al., 2019; Kudrna et al., 2011; Litman et al., 2018; Maes et al., 2019; Middleton-Welling et al., 2020; Reinhardt et al., 2020; Wiemers et al., 2020) only very few have used the name Parnassius corybas (e.g. Korb, 2020b; Kozlov et al., 2019). The paper by Balletto et al. (2014) is listed by Korb (2020a) as supporting the opinions and decisions of Hanus & Theye (2010, 2011), but this is incorrect, because Balletto et al. (2014) explicitly suggest to protect the name Parnassius phoebus by referral to the ICZN (Balletto & Bonelli, 2014). Even on the internet, most websites refrain from using the new name (e.g. www. lepinet.fr, www.lepiforum.de, www.pyrgus.de, https://www.ufz.de/lepidiv/, https://lepus. unine.ch, www.eurobutterflies.com, https://www.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life). On Wikipedia and Wikiwand, only the Russian language version uses it, whereas the English, German, French, Italian and Dutch versions do not. In my view, Article 75.6 of the Code is the correct answer to Case 3767 and therefore I hope for a positive decision of the ICZN.
在最近的欧洲蝴蝶清单(Wiemers et al.， 2018)中，来自11个不同国家的12名共同作者同意保留Parnassius phoebus (Fabricius, 1793)这个名字，直到委员会做出决定，因为这个名字在过去的150年里一直在使用，而Parnassius corybas Fischer von Waldheim, 1823年的名字直到Hanus & Theye(2010年，2011年)才被使用。Korb (2020a)在他的反对意见中认为，许多论文和网站已经使用了Parnassius corybas这个名字，但与许多最近继续使用Parnassius phoebus这个名字的作品相比(例如Hiermann et al.， 2019;Kudrna et al.， 2011;Litman et al.， 2018;Maes等人，2019;Middleton-Welling et al.， 2020;Reinhardt et al.， 2020;Wiemers et al.， 2020)只有极少数使用Parnassius corybas这个名称(例如Korb, 2020b;Kozlov等人，2019)。Balletto et al.(2014)的论文被Korb (2020a)列为支持Hanus & Theye(2010, 2011)的意见和决定，但这是不正确的，因为Balletto et al.(2014)明确建议通过参考ICZN来保护Parnassius phoebus这个名字(Balletto & Bonelli, 2014)。即使在互联网上，大多数网站也避免使用新名称(例如www)。lepinet。fr, www.lepiforum.de, www.pyrgus.de, https://www.ufz.de/lepidiv/， https://lepusunine。(www.eurobutterflies.com, https://www.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life)。在维基百科和维基魔杖上，只有俄语版本使用它，而英语、德语、法语、意大利语和荷兰语版本则没有。在我看来，法典第75.6条是3767案的正确答案，因此我希望国际刑事法院作出积极的决定。
{"title":"Comment (Case 3767) – Support for the conservation of prevailing usage of the specific name Papilio phoebus Fabricius, 1793 (currently Parnassius phoebus), and that of Doritis ariadne Lederer, 1853 (currently Parnassius ariadne), by designation of a neotype","authors":"M. Wiemers","doi":"10.21805/bzn.v78.a030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v78.a030","url":null,"abstract":"In the most recent European checklist of butterflies (Wiemers et al., 2018) there was agreement among the 12 co-authors (from 11 different countries) to keep the name Parnassius phoebus (Fabricius, 1793) until the case has been decided by the commission, because this name has been used continuously during the past 150 years whereas the name Parnassius corybas Fischer von Waldheim, 1823 never has until by Hanus & Theye (2010, 2011). Korb (2020a) in his opposing comment argues that many papers and websites already use the name Parnassius corybas but compared to the many recent works that have continued to use the name Parnassius phoebus (e.g. Hiermann et al., 2019; Kudrna et al., 2011; Litman et al., 2018; Maes et al., 2019; Middleton-Welling et al., 2020; Reinhardt et al., 2020; Wiemers et al., 2020) only very few have used the name Parnassius corybas (e.g. Korb, 2020b; Kozlov et al., 2019). The paper by Balletto et al. (2014) is listed by Korb (2020a) as supporting the opinions and decisions of Hanus & Theye (2010, 2011), but this is incorrect, because Balletto et al. (2014) explicitly suggest to protect the name Parnassius phoebus by referral to the ICZN (Balletto & Bonelli, 2014). Even on the internet, most websites refrain from using the new name (e.g. www. lepinet.fr, www.lepiforum.de, www.pyrgus.de, https://www.ufz.de/lepidiv/, https://lepus. unine.ch, www.eurobutterflies.com, https://www.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life). On Wikipedia and Wikiwand, only the Russian language version uses it, whereas the English, German, French, Italian and Dutch versions do not. In my view, Article 75.6 of the Code is the correct answer to Case 3767 and therefore I hope for a positive decision of the ICZN.","PeriodicalId":22414,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83856695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract. The purpose of this application, under Article 23.9.5 of the Code, is to conserve the specific name Helix plicaria Lamarck, 1816, a junior primary homonym of Helix plicaria Born, 1778. These names are currently in use for two different groups of land and freshwater snails, respectively, and have not been treated as congeneric since 1828. Helix plicaria Born, 1778 was first transferred to the genus Bulimus Scopoli, 1777 and subsequently to the genera Thiara Röding, 1798, Melania Lamarck, 1799, Melanoides Olivier, 1804 and Stenomelania Fischer, 1885. Helix plicaria Lamarck, 1816 has either been treated as belonging to Helix Linnaeus, 1758, Cochlea Da Costa, 1778 or has been included in Hemicycla Swainson, 1840. It is proposed that Helix plicaria Lamarck, 1816 be conserved by ruling it is not invalid by reason of being a junior homonym of Helix plicaria Born, 1778.
{"title":"Case 3838 – Helix plicaria Lamarck, 1816 (currently Hemicycla plicaria; Gastropoda, Eupulmonata, Stylommatophora, Helicidae): proposed conservation of the specific name","authors":"Benedikt Wiggering, M. Glaubrecht, M. Neiber","doi":"10.21805/bzn.v78.a024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v78.a024","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The purpose of this application, under Article 23.9.5 of the Code, is to conserve the specific name Helix plicaria Lamarck, 1816, a junior primary homonym of Helix plicaria Born, 1778. These names are currently in use for two different groups of land and freshwater snails, respectively, and have not been treated as congeneric since 1828. Helix plicaria Born, 1778 was first transferred to the genus Bulimus Scopoli, 1777 and subsequently to the genera Thiara Röding, 1798, Melania Lamarck, 1799, Melanoides Olivier, 1804 and Stenomelania Fischer, 1885. Helix plicaria Lamarck, 1816 has either been treated as belonging to Helix Linnaeus, 1758, Cochlea Da Costa, 1778 or has been included in Hemicycla Swainson, 1840. It is proposed that Helix plicaria Lamarck, 1816 be conserved by ruling it is not invalid by reason of being a junior homonym of Helix plicaria Born, 1778.","PeriodicalId":22414,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88163301","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Opinion 2482 (Case 3783) – Orchestes Illiger, 1798 (Insecta, Coleoptera, Curculionoidea, Curculionidae): name conserved by conditional reversal of precedence with respect to Salius Schrank, 1798","authors":"","doi":"10.21805/bzn.v78.a039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21805/bzn.v78.a039","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22414,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of zoological nomenclature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78697074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：