Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-20DOI: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100481
Jordi H C Boons, Phuong Thuy Nguyen Ho, Anna van Houwelingen, M Arfan Ikram, Gertjan Dingemanse, Bernd Kremer, Meike W Vernooij, Andre Goedegebure, Julia Neitzel
Introduction: Hearing loss (HL) is a potential risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD), with animal studies suggesting a bidirectional relationship. This study examines whether HL links to changes in AD pathology and, whether AD biomarkers relate to subsequent HL progression.
Methods: Baseline Aβ42/Aβ40 and p-tau217 were measured using single-molecule arrays in 474 participants of the Rotterdam Study (mean age=62.37) between 2010-2016. HL was defined as the better-ear's pure-tone threshold average. After seven years, participants underwent amyloid PET; HL and p-tau217 were reassessed two years after PET.
Results: Baseline HL was not associated with amyloid PET positivity, Aβ42/Aβ40, or longitudinally with p-tau217. Likewise, HL progression did not predict PET outcomes. APOE4 carriership did not modify associations with Aβ PET. Similarly, baseline plasma biomarkers were also unrelated to longitudinal HL changes.
Conclusion: No bidirectional association was observed between HL and AD pathology, suggesting that HL may contribute to dementia through other pathways.
听力损失(HL)是阿尔茨海默病(AD)的潜在危险因素,动物研究表明两者之间存在双向关系。本研究探讨了HL是否与阿尔茨海默病病理变化有关,以及阿尔茨海默病生物标志物是否与随后的HL进展有关。方法:使用单分子阵列测量2010-2016年鹿特丹研究474名参与者(平均年龄=62.37)的基线a - β42/ a - β40和p-tau217。HL定义为较好耳的纯音阈值平均值。七年后,参与者接受淀粉样蛋白PET;在PET后2年重新评估HL和p-tau217。结果:基线HL与淀粉样蛋白PET阳性,Aβ42/Aβ40,或纵向与p-tau217无关。同样,HL进展也不能预测PET结果。APOE4携带者不改变与Aβ PET的相关性。同样,基线血浆生物标志物也与HL的纵向变化无关。结论:HL与AD病理无双向关联,提示HL可能通过其他途径导致痴呆。
{"title":"No longitudinal association between hearing loss and Alzheimer's disease pathology.","authors":"Jordi H C Boons, Phuong Thuy Nguyen Ho, Anna van Houwelingen, M Arfan Ikram, Gertjan Dingemanse, Bernd Kremer, Meike W Vernooij, Andre Goedegebure, Julia Neitzel","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100481","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100481","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hearing loss (HL) is a potential risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD), with animal studies suggesting a bidirectional relationship. This study examines whether HL links to changes in AD pathology and, whether AD biomarkers relate to subsequent HL progression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline Aβ42/Aβ40 and p-tau217 were measured using single-molecule arrays in 474 participants of the Rotterdam Study (mean age=62.37) between 2010-2016. HL was defined as the better-ear's pure-tone threshold average. After seven years, participants underwent amyloid PET; HL and p-tau217 were reassessed two years after PET.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline HL was not associated with amyloid PET positivity, Aβ42/Aβ40, or longitudinally with p-tau217. Likewise, HL progression did not predict PET outcomes. APOE4 carriership did not modify associations with Aβ PET. Similarly, baseline plasma biomarkers were also unrelated to longitudinal HL changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No bidirectional association was observed between HL and AD pathology, suggesting that HL may contribute to dementia through other pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"13 3","pages":"100481"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12856869/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146019687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-15DOI: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100476
Anna Rosenberg, Alina Solomon, Alexandre Bonnard, Makrina Daniilidou, Göran Hagman, Anette Hall, Anna Matton, Ulf Öhlund-Wistbacka, Eric Westman, Miia Kivipelto
Lecanemab and donanemab are the first anti-Aβ treatments to receive approval in Europe. Eligibility criteria are strict, eg., APOE ε4/4 carriers are excluded. Successful implementation in public healthcare hinges on accurate estimates of eligibility rates in settings which will be the first to roll out the treatments (specialized memory clinics with early disease stages). We applied the appropriate use recommendations (AUR) to assess treatment eligibility in a Swedish tertiary memory clinic where Aβ and APOE assessments are routinely performed. Of the full cohort (N = 410), 26 and 25 patients met the AUR criteria for lecanemab and donanemab, respectively (6 %; partial overlap between the groups). After excluding APOE ε4/4 carriers in line with the European guidelines, only 14 and 13 patients remained eligible (3 %). In clinics with younger populations, a significant percentage of potentially eligible patients are likely to have the APOE ε4/4 genotype. These findings are important to inform the implementation of anti-Aβ treatments.
{"title":"Preparing for the implementation of anti-amyloid therapies in Europe: Assessing real-world eligibility for lecanemab and donanemab in a Swedish memory clinic.","authors":"Anna Rosenberg, Alina Solomon, Alexandre Bonnard, Makrina Daniilidou, Göran Hagman, Anette Hall, Anna Matton, Ulf Öhlund-Wistbacka, Eric Westman, Miia Kivipelto","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100476","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100476","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lecanemab and donanemab are the first anti-Aβ treatments to receive approval in Europe. Eligibility criteria are strict, eg., APOE ε4/4 carriers are excluded. Successful implementation in public healthcare hinges on accurate estimates of eligibility rates in settings which will be the first to roll out the treatments (specialized memory clinics with early disease stages). We applied the appropriate use recommendations (AUR) to assess treatment eligibility in a Swedish tertiary memory clinic where Aβ and APOE assessments are routinely performed. Of the full cohort (N = 410), 26 and 25 patients met the AUR criteria for lecanemab and donanemab, respectively (6 %; partial overlap between the groups). After excluding APOE ε4/4 carriers in line with the European guidelines, only 14 and 13 patients remained eligible (3 %). In clinics with younger populations, a significant percentage of potentially eligible patients are likely to have the APOE ε4/4 genotype. These findings are important to inform the implementation of anti-Aβ treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"13 3","pages":"100476"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12835597/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145990571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-01Epub Date: 2026-01-21DOI: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100483
Kristofer Harris, Madison Shyer, Dulin Wang, Elizabeth He, Matias Cattani, Catherine Zhang, Christine M Farrell, Xiaoqian Jiang, Yejin Kim, Paul E Schulz
<p><strong>Background: </strong>A subset of Alzheimer's disease patients progresses much more rapidly than average. These rapid progressors exhibit accelerated cognitive and functional decline. Potential differences in Alzheimer's biomarkers for rapid progressors and their responses to disease-modifying treatments remain poorly understood, with previous clinical trials and studies producing limited biomarker data and inconsistent results.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Examine differences in rapid progressor versus non-rapid progressor outcomes in two AD treatment trials (bapineuzumab and semagacestat) and investigate cognitive and biomarker progression in the placebo groups.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four randomized, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trials from the Center for Global Clinical Research Data (Semagacestat) and the Yale University Open Data Access Project (Bapineuzumab).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>4,902 patients (2,355 in bapineuzumab trials, 2,647 in semagacestat trials). Rapid progressors were operationally defined as the 10% of patients with the largest changes in cognitive scores from baseline to trial end.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Bapineuzumab (monoclonal antibody) and Semagacestat (γ-secretase inhibitor).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Cognitive assessments (CDR-SB, MMSE, ADAS-Cog, ADCS-ADL) and biological markers (CSF and plasma levels, MRI, FDG PET Scan, and Amyloid PET Scan) at baseline and endpoint.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rapid progressors showed distinct baseline characteristics in both the bapineuzumab and semagacestat trials: younger age (61.27 vs 63.14 years, p=0.008; and, 72.64 v. 73.64 years, p=0.046), a higher proportion of APOE4 carriers (87.6% vs 41.4%, p<0.001; and, 85.2% vs 49.3%, p = 0.022), and greater cognitive impairment across all measures (p<0.001). Both progression groups demonstrated improvement in specific biomarkers with treatment, though with different patterns. With bapineuzumab according to Conditional Average Treatment Effect analysis, rapid progressors showed biomarker improvement in amyloid CSF, p-Tau CSF, and amyloid PET scan, while non-rapid progressors demonstrated biomarker improvements in p-Tau CSF, amyloid PET, and MRI. With semagacestat, rapid progressors showed improvements in amyloid CSF and plasma while non-rapid progressors showed improvements in amyloid CSF, FDG PET, and MRI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides crucial insights for clinical practice and trial design. The distinct response patterns between progression groups suggest that early identification and balancing of RPs between groups could improve clinical trial efficiency. The findings support the development of personalized treatment approaches for rapid progressors, who have aggressive disease progression. These results may significantly modify clinical trial design and patient care in Alzheimer's dis
背景:一部分阿尔茨海默病患者的病情进展比平均水平快得多。这些快速进展者表现出加速的认知和功能衰退。阿尔茨海默病快速进展者生物标志物的潜在差异及其对疾病改善治疗的反应仍然知之甚少,先前的临床试验和研究产生有限的生物标志物数据和不一致的结果。目的:研究两项阿尔茨海默病治疗试验(巴哌珠单抗和semagacestat)快速进展和非快速进展结果的差异,并调查安慰剂组的认知和生物标志物进展。设计:回顾性队列研究。环境:来自全球临床研究数据中心(Semagacestat)和耶鲁大学开放数据获取项目(Bapineuzumab)的四项随机、双盲、3期临床试验。参与者:4,902例患者(2,355例巴哌珠单抗试验,2,647例semagacestat试验)。快速进展者被手术定义为从基线到试验结束认知评分变化最大的10%的患者。干预:巴单抗(单克隆抗体)和Semagacestat (γ-分泌酶抑制剂)。测量:基线和终点的认知评估(CDR-SB、MMSE、ADAS-Cog、ADCS-ADL)和生物标志物(CSF和血浆水平、MRI、FDG PET扫描和淀粉样蛋白PET扫描)。结果:快速进展者在巴哌珠单抗和semagacestat试验中均显示出明显的基线特征:年龄更小(61.27 vs 63.14岁,p=0.008; 72.64 vs 73.64岁,p=0.046), APOE4携带者比例更高(87.6% vs 41.4%)。进展组之间不同的反应模式表明,早期识别和平衡组间rp可以提高临床试验效率。该研究结果支持针对具有侵袭性疾病进展的快速进展患者开发个性化治疗方法。这些结果可能会显著改变阿尔茨海默病的临床试验设计和患者护理。
{"title":"The influence of bapineuzumab and semagacestat on rapid progressors: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Kristofer Harris, Madison Shyer, Dulin Wang, Elizabeth He, Matias Cattani, Catherine Zhang, Christine M Farrell, Xiaoqian Jiang, Yejin Kim, Paul E Schulz","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100483","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100483","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A subset of Alzheimer's disease patients progresses much more rapidly than average. These rapid progressors exhibit accelerated cognitive and functional decline. Potential differences in Alzheimer's biomarkers for rapid progressors and their responses to disease-modifying treatments remain poorly understood, with previous clinical trials and studies producing limited biomarker data and inconsistent results.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Examine differences in rapid progressor versus non-rapid progressor outcomes in two AD treatment trials (bapineuzumab and semagacestat) and investigate cognitive and biomarker progression in the placebo groups.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four randomized, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trials from the Center for Global Clinical Research Data (Semagacestat) and the Yale University Open Data Access Project (Bapineuzumab).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>4,902 patients (2,355 in bapineuzumab trials, 2,647 in semagacestat trials). Rapid progressors were operationally defined as the 10% of patients with the largest changes in cognitive scores from baseline to trial end.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Bapineuzumab (monoclonal antibody) and Semagacestat (γ-secretase inhibitor).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Cognitive assessments (CDR-SB, MMSE, ADAS-Cog, ADCS-ADL) and biological markers (CSF and plasma levels, MRI, FDG PET Scan, and Amyloid PET Scan) at baseline and endpoint.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rapid progressors showed distinct baseline characteristics in both the bapineuzumab and semagacestat trials: younger age (61.27 vs 63.14 years, p=0.008; and, 72.64 v. 73.64 years, p=0.046), a higher proportion of APOE4 carriers (87.6% vs 41.4%, p<0.001; and, 85.2% vs 49.3%, p = 0.022), and greater cognitive impairment across all measures (p<0.001). Both progression groups demonstrated improvement in specific biomarkers with treatment, though with different patterns. With bapineuzumab according to Conditional Average Treatment Effect analysis, rapid progressors showed biomarker improvement in amyloid CSF, p-Tau CSF, and amyloid PET scan, while non-rapid progressors demonstrated biomarker improvements in p-Tau CSF, amyloid PET, and MRI. With semagacestat, rapid progressors showed improvements in amyloid CSF and plasma while non-rapid progressors showed improvements in amyloid CSF, FDG PET, and MRI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides crucial insights for clinical practice and trial design. The distinct response patterns between progression groups suggest that early identification and balancing of RPs between groups could improve clinical trial efficiency. The findings support the development of personalized treatment approaches for rapid progressors, who have aggressive disease progression. These results may significantly modify clinical trial design and patient care in Alzheimer's dis","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"13 3","pages":"100483"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12859249/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146019620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-28DOI: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100524
Josephine Stubs, Geir Selbæk, Bjørn Heine Strand, Gill Livingston, Kaarin J Anstey, Kay Deckers, Mika Kivimäki, Steinar Krokstad, Fiona E Mathews, Ellen Melbye Langballe
Objective: To evaluate and compare the predictive value of eight dementia risk scores for late-life cognitive function and cognitive decline; ANU-ADRI, CAIDE, CogDrisk, LIBRA, LIBRA2, UKBDRS(-APOE), and a Lancet commission-based risk score.
Methods: Using Norwegian Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) data, we calculated risk scores from lifestyle and health data of 7221 dementia-free participants (mean age: 76.8 years, 54.1% female) collected in HUNT3 (2006-2008). Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale (MoCA) 11 years later in HUNT4 70+, and reassessed in 4716 participants 4 years thereafter. Associations between continuous risk scores or risk score tertiles, cognition and cognitive decline were examined using linear mixed-effects models. Logistic regression models were used to test associations between risk scores and a ≥ 3-point decline in MoCA scores.
Results: All risk scores were significantly associated with cognitive function and cognitive decline. Associations with cognitive function ranged from UKBDRS β per 1SD=-1.61(95%CI:-1.72,-1.51) to CAIDE (β=-0.74;95%CI:-0.82,-0.67), and with yearly cognitive decline from Lancet (β=-0.23;95%CI:-0.27,-0.18) to CAIDE (β=-0.04;95%CI:-0.07,-0.02). High-low risk group differences in cognitive function were largest for CogDrisk (β=-3.04;95%CI:-3.27,-2.81), LIBRA (β=-3.04;95%CI:-3.27,-2.80) and lowest for CAIDE (β=-1.65;95%CI:-1.86,-1.44). High-risk groups showed the steepest decline for UKBDRS-APOE (β=-0.43;95%CI:-0.52,-0.34), Lancet (β=-0.39;95%CI:-0.48,-0.30), and LIBRA (β=-0.38;95%CI:-0.47,-0.28). All scores predicted ≥3-point decline modestly: AUCs were highest for UKBDRS (AUC=0.61;95%CI:0.60,0.63), UKBDRS-APOE (0.61;95%CI:0.60,0.63), CogDrisk (0.60;95%CI:0.58,0.62), and Lancet (0.60;95%CI:0.58,0.61), but none outperformed a model including age and education alone (0.61;95%CI:0.60,0.63).
Conclusion: Risk scores captured meaningful gradients in cognition and decline but offered limited discriminatory accuracy beyond demographics, supporting their use for prevention-oriented risk profiling rather than prediction.
{"title":"Predicting cognitive decline: Comparative analysis of ANU-ADRI, CAIDE, CogDrisk, LIBRA, LIBRA2, UKBDRS and Lancet based dementia risk scores in the HUNT study.","authors":"Josephine Stubs, Geir Selbæk, Bjørn Heine Strand, Gill Livingston, Kaarin J Anstey, Kay Deckers, Mika Kivimäki, Steinar Krokstad, Fiona E Mathews, Ellen Melbye Langballe","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100524","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100524","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate and compare the predictive value of eight dementia risk scores for late-life cognitive function and cognitive decline; ANU-ADRI, CAIDE, CogDrisk, LIBRA, LIBRA2, UKBDRS(-APOE), and a Lancet commission-based risk score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Norwegian Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) data, we calculated risk scores from lifestyle and health data of 7221 dementia-free participants (mean age: 76.8 years, 54.1% female) collected in HUNT3 (2006-2008). Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale (MoCA) 11 years later in HUNT4 70+, and reassessed in 4716 participants 4 years thereafter. Associations between continuous risk scores or risk score tertiles, cognition and cognitive decline were examined using linear mixed-effects models. Logistic regression models were used to test associations between risk scores and a ≥ 3-point decline in MoCA scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All risk scores were significantly associated with cognitive function and cognitive decline. Associations with cognitive function ranged from UKBDRS β <sub>per 1SD</sub>=-1.61(95%CI:-1.72,-1.51) to CAIDE (β=-0.74;95%CI:-0.82,-0.67), and with yearly cognitive decline from Lancet (β=-0.23;95%CI:-0.27,-0.18) to CAIDE (β=-0.04;95%CI:-0.07,-0.02). High-low risk group differences in cognitive function were largest for CogDrisk (β=-3.04;95%CI:-3.27,-2.81), LIBRA (β=-3.04;95%CI:-3.27,-2.80) and lowest for CAIDE (β=-1.65;95%CI:-1.86,-1.44). High-risk groups showed the steepest decline for UKBDRS-APOE (β=-0.43;95%CI:-0.52,-0.34), Lancet (β=-0.39;95%CI:-0.48,-0.30), and LIBRA (β=-0.38;95%CI:-0.47,-0.28). All scores predicted ≥3-point decline modestly: AUCs were highest for UKBDRS (AUC=0.61;95%CI:0.60,0.63), UKBDRS-APOE (0.61;95%CI:0.60,0.63), CogDrisk (0.60;95%CI:0.58,0.62), and Lancet (0.60;95%CI:0.58,0.61), but none outperformed a model including age and education alone (0.61;95%CI:0.60,0.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Risk scores captured meaningful gradients in cognition and decline but offered limited discriminatory accuracy beyond demographics, supporting their use for prevention-oriented risk profiling rather than prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"13 4","pages":"100524"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12966730/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147327166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-27DOI: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100513
Il Han Choo, Hoyoung Park, Brian A Gordon, Randall J Bateman
Background: Alzheimer's disease postmortem studies demonstrate that amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles are present in subcortical regions.
Objective: To investigate longitudinal subcortical structural changes in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease in relation to multiple PET and fluid biomarkers.
Design: Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Network (DIAN) Observational study SETTING: Multicenter study PARTICIPANTS: Participants were identified as mutation-carriers of pathologic variants in presenilin-1, presenilin-2, or amyloid precursor protein and as non-carriers from the same families as the mutation-carriers. They underwent baseline and 2 and more times longitudinal follow-up assessments of multiple biomarkers MEASUREMENTS: Participants underwent structural MRI, ¹¹C-Pittsburgh Compound B PET, ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET, and CSF and plasma assessments. Rates of biomarker change as a function of estimated years to symptom onset were estimated using multivariate linear mixed-effects models, and longitudinal associations between subcortical atrophy and multiple biomarkers were evaluated.
Results: A total of 601 participants completed one or more clinical evaluations, with up to eight annual visits. Mutation carriers showed significantly greater longitudinal atrophy in the left amygdala, bilateral thalamus, putamen, nucleus accumbens, and hippocampus compared with non-carriers (Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.05). The earliest divergence was observed 13.2 years before the expected symptom onset in the right nucleus accumbens, following amyloid-β (Aβ) accumulation in the right thalamus that began 23.8 years before onset. Among carriers, atrophy in the right thalamus, bilateral putamen, and bilateral nucleus accumbens was significantly associated with region-specific or cortical Aβ accumulation, as well as with CSF Aβ42, Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, total tau, and phosphorylated tau (Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.05).
Conclusions: The present findings may provide a unique and well-characterized model for investigating the temporal ordering of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers.
{"title":"Longitudinal subcortical volume changes and their correlations with multiple PET and fluid biomarkers in dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Il Han Choo, Hoyoung Park, Brian A Gordon, Randall J Bateman","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100513","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100513","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alzheimer's disease postmortem studies demonstrate that amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles are present in subcortical regions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate longitudinal subcortical structural changes in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease in relation to multiple PET and fluid biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Network (DIAN) Observational study SETTING: Multicenter study PARTICIPANTS: Participants were identified as mutation-carriers of pathologic variants in presenilin-1, presenilin-2, or amyloid precursor protein and as non-carriers from the same families as the mutation-carriers. They underwent baseline and 2 and more times longitudinal follow-up assessments of multiple biomarkers MEASUREMENTS: Participants underwent structural MRI, ¹¹C-Pittsburgh Compound B PET, ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET, and CSF and plasma assessments. Rates of biomarker change as a function of estimated years to symptom onset were estimated using multivariate linear mixed-effects models, and longitudinal associations between subcortical atrophy and multiple biomarkers were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 601 participants completed one or more clinical evaluations, with up to eight annual visits. Mutation carriers showed significantly greater longitudinal atrophy in the left amygdala, bilateral thalamus, putamen, nucleus accumbens, and hippocampus compared with non-carriers (Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.05). The earliest divergence was observed 13.2 years before the expected symptom onset in the right nucleus accumbens, following amyloid-β (Aβ) accumulation in the right thalamus that began 23.8 years before onset. Among carriers, atrophy in the right thalamus, bilateral putamen, and bilateral nucleus accumbens was significantly associated with region-specific or cortical Aβ accumulation, as well as with CSF Aβ42, Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, total tau, and phosphorylated tau (Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present findings may provide a unique and well-characterized model for investigating the temporal ordering of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"13 4","pages":"100513"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12964006/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147322067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Neuronal autoantibodies, including against neuronal surface receptors or intracellular antigens, are established pathogenic mediators and therapeutic targets in autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS). These antibodies are now increasingly reported in patients with clinically diagnosed neurodegenerative dementia, prompting re-evaluation of a neurodegenerative etiology. Within neurodegenerative trajectories, whether such antibodies act as pathogenic drivers, non-causal markers, or immune modulators remains unresolved, and heterogeneous cohorts, assays, and endpoints limit inference and clinical translation. This review integrates current research at the intersection of autoimmunity and neurodegeneration and highlights accumulating evidence for a biological continuum. This model suggests that antibody-mediated mechanisms may extend beyond acute inflammation, with sustained exposure contributing to time-dependent neurodegeneration. To facilitate clinical translation, we advance a standardized diagnostic workflow comprising three sequential stages: (i) a pretest-probability triage that defines high-risk constellations prompting antibody testing, stratifies patients accordingly; (ii) a specimen-and-assay pathway for standardized testing workflow and structured interpretation of results; and (iii) post-test integrated analysis to adjudicate pathogenic relevance based on phenotype-antibody concordance. By bridging observational research to clinical decision-making, the framework supports identification of an immunologically modulated neurodegenerative subtype with potential for therapeutic intervention, while reducing false positives and avoiding non-essential immunotherapy in low-probability contexts.
{"title":"Neuronal autoantibodies in neurodegenerative dementia: From evidence to clinical framework.","authors":"Heya Luan, Xiaodong Han, Chang Xu, Aidi Shan, Xin Wang, Shaoqi Li, Qi Yao, Tong Cui, Jinxuan Guo, Boye Wen, Yao Sun, Chuqiao Li, Qingyuan Sun, Cuibai Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100515","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100515","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuronal autoantibodies, including against neuronal surface receptors or intracellular antigens, are established pathogenic mediators and therapeutic targets in autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS). These antibodies are now increasingly reported in patients with clinically diagnosed neurodegenerative dementia, prompting re-evaluation of a neurodegenerative etiology. Within neurodegenerative trajectories, whether such antibodies act as pathogenic drivers, non-causal markers, or immune modulators remains unresolved, and heterogeneous cohorts, assays, and endpoints limit inference and clinical translation. This review integrates current research at the intersection of autoimmunity and neurodegeneration and highlights accumulating evidence for a biological continuum. This model suggests that antibody-mediated mechanisms may extend beyond acute inflammation, with sustained exposure contributing to time-dependent neurodegeneration. To facilitate clinical translation, we advance a standardized diagnostic workflow comprising three sequential stages: (i) a pretest-probability triage that defines high-risk constellations prompting antibody testing, stratifies patients accordingly; (ii) a specimen-and-assay pathway for standardized testing workflow and structured interpretation of results; and (iii) post-test integrated analysis to adjudicate pathogenic relevance based on phenotype-antibody concordance. By bridging observational research to clinical decision-making, the framework supports identification of an immunologically modulated neurodegenerative subtype with potential for therapeutic intervention, while reducing false positives and avoiding non-essential immunotherapy in low-probability contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"13 5","pages":"100515"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12966672/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147322227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-27DOI: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100519
Marc W Haut, Camila Vieira Ligo Teixeira, Patrick D Worhunsky, Rashi I Mehta, Joseph E Malone, Melanie Ward, Cierra M Keith, Holly E Phelps, Stephanie Pockl, Nafiisah Rajabalee, Khalid Sharif, Gary Marano, Pierre-Francois D'Haese, Ali R Rezai
Amyloid related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) are the most significant risk associated with the use of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies (MAB) for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Currently, the presence of the APOE ε4 allele is the best predictor for the development of ARIA. However, the degree of baseline memory impairment has not been fully explored as a risk factor for ARIA. Here, we examined MAB outcomes in a memory clinic population and compared patients with AD who developed ARIA to a case-matched group who did not develop ARIA. Participants who developed ARIA had greater numbers of recall intrusions and false positives, both markers for memory consolidation, at baseline than those who did not develop ARIA. We also observed greater baseline hippocampal and supplementary motor cortical atrophy with ARIA. These differences remained when controlling for the APOE ε4 allele and the presence of pretreatment microhemorrhages. Further investigation of memory impairment and associated brain atrophy is warranted to understand ARIA risk and MAB outcomes in AD.
{"title":"Memory Consolidation and ARIA in Individuals Receiving Anti-amyloid Monoclonal Antibodies.","authors":"Marc W Haut, Camila Vieira Ligo Teixeira, Patrick D Worhunsky, Rashi I Mehta, Joseph E Malone, Melanie Ward, Cierra M Keith, Holly E Phelps, Stephanie Pockl, Nafiisah Rajabalee, Khalid Sharif, Gary Marano, Pierre-Francois D'Haese, Ali R Rezai","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100519","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100519","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amyloid related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) are the most significant risk associated with the use of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies (MAB) for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Currently, the presence of the APOE ε4 allele is the best predictor for the development of ARIA. However, the degree of baseline memory impairment has not been fully explored as a risk factor for ARIA. Here, we examined MAB outcomes in a memory clinic population and compared patients with AD who developed ARIA to a case-matched group who did not develop ARIA. Participants who developed ARIA had greater numbers of recall intrusions and false positives, both markers for memory consolidation, at baseline than those who did not develop ARIA. We also observed greater baseline hippocampal and supplementary motor cortical atrophy with ARIA. These differences remained when controlling for the APOE ε4 allele and the presence of pretreatment microhemorrhages. Further investigation of memory impairment and associated brain atrophy is warranted to understand ARIA risk and MAB outcomes in AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"13 5","pages":"100519"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12966669/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147322255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-27DOI: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100523
Miray Budak, Kevin S Heffernan, Victoria Paruzel, Soodeh Moallemian, Bernadette A Fausto, Nicholas Ashton, Henrik Zetterberg, Fanny M Elahi, Mark A Gluck
Background: Vascular health is a critical and potentially modifiable determinant of Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk, yet its contribution to early neurodegenerative processes remains incompletely understood, particularly among African Americans, who experience a disproportionate AD burden. Estimated pulse wave velocity (ePWV), derived from age and blood pressure, provides a scalable index of vascular stiffness.
Objectives: To examine associations between vascular stiffness and plasma biomarkers of AD-related neurodegeneration in older African Americans.
Design: Cross-sectional observational study.
Setting: Community-based aging cohort study conducted at an academic research center.
Participants: A total of 145 cognitively unimpaired older African Americans (mean age=71.18±6.83 years; 110 women).
Measurements: ePWV was calculated using validated equations based on age and blood pressure. Plasma biomarkers included phosphorylated tau217 (p-tau217; N=145), phosphorylated tau231 (p-tau231; N=126), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP; N=126), neurofilament light chain (NfL; N=126), and amyloid-β42/40 ratio (Aβ42/40; N=126). Multivariable regression models adjusted for sex, education, pulse pressure, waist-to-hip ratio, global cognition, and hypertension status.
Results: Higher ePWV was significantly associated with higher plasma concentrations of p-tau217 (β=0.34, p=.006), GFAP (β=0.55, p<.001), and NfL (β=0.52, p<.001), but not with p-tau231 and Aβ42/40 (p>.05).
Conclusions: Greater vascular stiffness, indexed by elevated ePWV, was associated with circulating markers of tau-related neurodegeneration, astrocytic activation, and axonal injury in cognitively unimpaired older African Americans. The absence of association with p-tau231 and Aβ42/40 suggests preferential effects on neurovascular damage and later tau-related processes, but no primary effect on biomarkers related to Aβ pathology, still highlighting vascular health as a modifiable target for AD prevention.
{"title":"Vascular stiffness predicts plasma markers of neurodegeneration among older African Americans.","authors":"Miray Budak, Kevin S Heffernan, Victoria Paruzel, Soodeh Moallemian, Bernadette A Fausto, Nicholas Ashton, Henrik Zetterberg, Fanny M Elahi, Mark A Gluck","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100523","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100523","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vascular health is a critical and potentially modifiable determinant of Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk, yet its contribution to early neurodegenerative processes remains incompletely understood, particularly among African Americans, who experience a disproportionate AD burden. Estimated pulse wave velocity (ePWV), derived from age and blood pressure, provides a scalable index of vascular stiffness.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine associations between vascular stiffness and plasma biomarkers of AD-related neurodegeneration in older African Americans.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community-based aging cohort study conducted at an academic research center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 145 cognitively unimpaired older African Americans (mean age=71.18±6.83 years; 110 women).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>ePWV was calculated using validated equations based on age and blood pressure. Plasma biomarkers included phosphorylated tau217 (p-tau217; N=145), phosphorylated tau231 (p-tau231; N=126), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP; N=126), neurofilament light chain (NfL; N=126), and amyloid-β42/40 ratio (Aβ42/40; N=126). Multivariable regression models adjusted for sex, education, pulse pressure, waist-to-hip ratio, global cognition, and hypertension status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher ePWV was significantly associated with higher plasma concentrations of p-tau217 (β=0.34, p=.006), GFAP (β=0.55, p<.001), and NfL (β=0.52, p<.001), but not with p-tau231 and Aβ42/40 (p>.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Greater vascular stiffness, indexed by elevated ePWV, was associated with circulating markers of tau-related neurodegeneration, astrocytic activation, and axonal injury in cognitively unimpaired older African Americans. The absence of association with p-tau231 and Aβ42/40 suggests preferential effects on neurovascular damage and later tau-related processes, but no primary effect on biomarkers related to Aβ pathology, still highlighting vascular health as a modifiable target for AD prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"13 4","pages":"100523"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12964279/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147322237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-27DOI: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100518
Xing Liu, Chenyi Yang, Xinyi Wang, Huihui Liao, Huan Liu, Ji Ma, Yi Sun, Haiyun Wang
Background: Nutritional supplementation is increasingly regarded as a potential strategy to preserve or enhance cognitive function in individuals with healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, its overall efficacy remains uncertain due to inconsistent findings across clinical trials.
Methods: In accordance with the guidelines outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Network Meta-Analyses, we conducted a comprehensive systematic search. Our inclusion criteria focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the impact of nutrient supplementation on cognitive function within healthy aging and MCI patients. The primary outcome of interest was the change in cognitive function, while the secondary outcome involved alterations in blood biochemical markers (e.g., homocysteine, vitamin B12, and serum folate levels).
Results: The meta-analysis results indicated that docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)+eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)+vitamin E+tryptophan+melatonin, as well as melatonin alone, significantly enhanced global cognitive function. Additionally, DHA, folic acid+DHA, and the DHA+EPA+vitamin E+tryptophan+melatonin were all effective in augmenting memory. DHA alone was found to be beneficial in improving processing speed, whereas vitamin D3 was associated with improvements in visuospatial function. Notably, sensitivity analyses revealed that while most domain-specific effects remained stable, the rankings of certain small-sample interventions were sensitive to study duration and sample size. Supplementation with folic acid, vitamin B12, and vitamin B6, whether administered individually or in combination, resulted in varying improvements in blood biomarkers, including homocysteine, vitamin B12, and serum folate levels.
Conclusions: Nutritional supplementation demonstrates nuanced, domain-specific benefits rather than universal cognitive enhancement. While specific multi-nutrient combinations show potential, their effects are significantly influenced by baseline cognitive status, age, and intervention duration. Our findings suggest that nutritional strategies should be tailored to individual cognitive profiles, emphasizing the need for personalized interventions and further high-quality, longitudinal trials to confirm long-term clinical impact.
{"title":"Nutritional supplements and cognition in healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Xing Liu, Chenyi Yang, Xinyi Wang, Huihui Liao, Huan Liu, Ji Ma, Yi Sun, Haiyun Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100518","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100518","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nutritional supplementation is increasingly regarded as a potential strategy to preserve or enhance cognitive function in individuals with healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, its overall efficacy remains uncertain due to inconsistent findings across clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In accordance with the guidelines outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Network Meta-Analyses, we conducted a comprehensive systematic search. Our inclusion criteria focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the impact of nutrient supplementation on cognitive function within healthy aging and MCI patients. The primary outcome of interest was the change in cognitive function, while the secondary outcome involved alterations in blood biochemical markers (e.g., homocysteine, vitamin B12, and serum folate levels).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis results indicated that docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)+eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)+vitamin E+tryptophan+melatonin, as well as melatonin alone, significantly enhanced global cognitive function. Additionally, DHA, folic acid+DHA, and the DHA+EPA+vitamin E+tryptophan+melatonin were all effective in augmenting memory. DHA alone was found to be beneficial in improving processing speed, whereas vitamin D3 was associated with improvements in visuospatial function. Notably, sensitivity analyses revealed that while most domain-specific effects remained stable, the rankings of certain small-sample interventions were sensitive to study duration and sample size. Supplementation with folic acid, vitamin B12, and vitamin B6, whether administered individually or in combination, resulted in varying improvements in blood biomarkers, including homocysteine, vitamin B12, and serum folate levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nutritional supplementation demonstrates nuanced, domain-specific benefits rather than universal cognitive enhancement. While specific multi-nutrient combinations show potential, their effects are significantly influenced by baseline cognitive status, age, and intervention duration. Our findings suggest that nutritional strategies should be tailored to individual cognitive profiles, emphasizing the need for personalized interventions and further high-quality, longitudinal trials to confirm long-term clinical impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"13 5","pages":"100518"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12966656/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147327080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-27DOI: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100526
Ron Handels, Marieke Hoevenaar-Blom, Manshu Song, Carol Brayne, Eric Moll van Charante, Fiona E Matthews, Junfang Xu, Linus Jönsson, Nicola Coley, Rachael Brooks, Xuening Jian, Tingting Qin, Youxin Wang, Wei Wang, Edo Richard, Anders Wimo
Introduction: We aimed to explore the potential incremental cost-effectiveness of the PRODEMOS coach-supported mobile health intervention for primary prevention of dementia versus standard of care provided to people aged 55-75 years with low socio-economic status (SES) in the United Kingdom (UK), and any SES in China.
Methods: 12-18-month PRODEMOS trial (ISRCTN15986016) efficacy outcomes on hypertension, obesity, hypercholesterolemia, physical inactivity and smoking were extrapolated to lifetime impact on dementia onset, myocardial infarction, stroke and death using a health-economic open-source simulation model.
Results: Simulated outcomes showed dementia cases were avoided (UK = -206 (-658 to 281), China = -140 (-456 to 205) per 100,000 persons) and disease-free time was gained for dementia, myocardial infarction and stroke (mean months per person UK = 0.4, 0.0 and 0.0; China = 0.2, 0.0 and 0.0 respectively). Assuming a maximum intervention duration of 10 years with a 10 % annual non-adherence rate, the incremental net health benefit in the UK (-0.190) and China (-0.009) indicated a potential lack cost-effectiveness.
Limitations: Our method was limited by strong assumptions regarding causality and sustained effectiveness, lack of some country-specific input estimates, and the lack of probabilistic analysis.
Conclusion: The PRODEMOS coach-supported mobile health intervention for the primary prevention of dementia, aimed at people aged 55 to 75 years with low SES in the UK and those of any SES in China, may potentially lack cost-effectiveness in both countries. However, lack of data required strong assumptions regarding causality and sustained effectiveness, which limited policy recommendations.
{"title":"Prevention of dementia using mobile phone applications (PRODEMOS) - a health-economic cost-utility analysis in people aged 55-75 years with low socio-economic status.","authors":"Ron Handels, Marieke Hoevenaar-Blom, Manshu Song, Carol Brayne, Eric Moll van Charante, Fiona E Matthews, Junfang Xu, Linus Jönsson, Nicola Coley, Rachael Brooks, Xuening Jian, Tingting Qin, Youxin Wang, Wei Wang, Edo Richard, Anders Wimo","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100526","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100526","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to explore the potential incremental cost-effectiveness of the PRODEMOS coach-supported mobile health intervention for primary prevention of dementia versus standard of care provided to people aged 55-75 years with low socio-economic status (SES) in the United Kingdom (UK), and any SES in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>12-18-month PRODEMOS trial (ISRCTN15986016) efficacy outcomes on hypertension, obesity, hypercholesterolemia, physical inactivity and smoking were extrapolated to lifetime impact on dementia onset, myocardial infarction, stroke and death using a health-economic open-source simulation model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Simulated outcomes showed dementia cases were avoided (UK = -206 (-658 to 281), China = -140 (-456 to 205) per 100,000 persons) and disease-free time was gained for dementia, myocardial infarction and stroke (mean months per person UK = 0.4, 0.0 and 0.0; China = 0.2, 0.0 and 0.0 respectively). Assuming a maximum intervention duration of 10 years with a 10 % annual non-adherence rate, the incremental net health benefit in the UK (-0.190) and China (-0.009) indicated a potential lack cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Our method was limited by strong assumptions regarding causality and sustained effectiveness, lack of some country-specific input estimates, and the lack of probabilistic analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PRODEMOS coach-supported mobile health intervention for the primary prevention of dementia, aimed at people aged 55 to 75 years with low SES in the UK and those of any SES in China, may potentially lack cost-effectiveness in both countries. However, lack of data required strong assumptions regarding causality and sustained effectiveness, which limited policy recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"13 5","pages":"100526"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12966664/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147322166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}