首页 > 最新文献

The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease最新文献

英文 中文
No longitudinal association between hearing loss and Alzheimer's disease pathology. 听力损失与阿尔茨海默病病理之间无纵向关联。
IF 7.8 Q2 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100481
Jordi H C Boons, Phuong Thuy Nguyen Ho, Anna van Houwelingen, M Arfan Ikram, Gertjan Dingemanse, Bernd Kremer, Meike W Vernooij, Andre Goedegebure, Julia Neitzel

Introduction: Hearing loss (HL) is a potential risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD), with animal studies suggesting a bidirectional relationship. This study examines whether HL links to changes in AD pathology and, whether AD biomarkers relate to subsequent HL progression.

Methods: Baseline Aβ42/Aβ40 and p-tau217 were measured using single-molecule arrays in 474 participants of the Rotterdam Study (mean age=62.37) between 2010-2016. HL was defined as the better-ear's pure-tone threshold average. After seven years, participants underwent amyloid PET; HL and p-tau217 were reassessed two years after PET.

Results: Baseline HL was not associated with amyloid PET positivity, Aβ42/Aβ40, or longitudinally with p-tau217. Likewise, HL progression did not predict PET outcomes. APOE4 carriership did not modify associations with Aβ PET. Similarly, baseline plasma biomarkers were also unrelated to longitudinal HL changes.

Conclusion: No bidirectional association was observed between HL and AD pathology, suggesting that HL may contribute to dementia through other pathways.

听力损失(HL)是阿尔茨海默病(AD)的潜在危险因素,动物研究表明两者之间存在双向关系。本研究探讨了HL是否与阿尔茨海默病病理变化有关,以及阿尔茨海默病生物标志物是否与随后的HL进展有关。方法:使用单分子阵列测量2010-2016年鹿特丹研究474名参与者(平均年龄=62.37)的基线a - β42/ a - β40和p-tau217。HL定义为较好耳的纯音阈值平均值。七年后,参与者接受淀粉样蛋白PET;在PET后2年重新评估HL和p-tau217。结果:基线HL与淀粉样蛋白PET阳性,Aβ42/Aβ40,或纵向与p-tau217无关。同样,HL进展也不能预测PET结果。APOE4携带者不改变与Aβ PET的相关性。同样,基线血浆生物标志物也与HL的纵向变化无关。结论:HL与AD病理无双向关联,提示HL可能通过其他途径导致痴呆。
{"title":"No longitudinal association between hearing loss and Alzheimer's disease pathology.","authors":"Jordi H C Boons, Phuong Thuy Nguyen Ho, Anna van Houwelingen, M Arfan Ikram, Gertjan Dingemanse, Bernd Kremer, Meike W Vernooij, Andre Goedegebure, Julia Neitzel","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100481","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100481","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hearing loss (HL) is a potential risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD), with animal studies suggesting a bidirectional relationship. This study examines whether HL links to changes in AD pathology and, whether AD biomarkers relate to subsequent HL progression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline Aβ42/Aβ40 and p-tau217 were measured using single-molecule arrays in 474 participants of the Rotterdam Study (mean age=62.37) between 2010-2016. HL was defined as the better-ear's pure-tone threshold average. After seven years, participants underwent amyloid PET; HL and p-tau217 were reassessed two years after PET.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline HL was not associated with amyloid PET positivity, Aβ42/Aβ40, or longitudinally with p-tau217. Likewise, HL progression did not predict PET outcomes. APOE4 carriership did not modify associations with Aβ PET. Similarly, baseline plasma biomarkers were also unrelated to longitudinal HL changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No bidirectional association was observed between HL and AD pathology, suggesting that HL may contribute to dementia through other pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"13 3","pages":"100481"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12856869/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146019687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preparing for the implementation of anti-amyloid therapies in Europe: Assessing real-world eligibility for lecanemab and donanemab in a Swedish memory clinic. 准备在欧洲实施抗淀粉样蛋白疗法:在瑞典记忆诊所评估lecanemab和donanemab的现实世界资格。
IF 7.8 Q2 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100476
Anna Rosenberg, Alina Solomon, Alexandre Bonnard, Makrina Daniilidou, Göran Hagman, Anette Hall, Anna Matton, Ulf Öhlund-Wistbacka, Eric Westman, Miia Kivipelto

Lecanemab and donanemab are the first anti-Aβ treatments to receive approval in Europe. Eligibility criteria are strict, eg., APOE ε4/4 carriers are excluded. Successful implementation in public healthcare hinges on accurate estimates of eligibility rates in settings which will be the first to roll out the treatments (specialized memory clinics with early disease stages). We applied the appropriate use recommendations (AUR) to assess treatment eligibility in a Swedish tertiary memory clinic where Aβ and APOE assessments are routinely performed. Of the full cohort (N = 410), 26 and 25 patients met the AUR criteria for lecanemab and donanemab, respectively (6 %; partial overlap between the groups). After excluding APOE ε4/4 carriers in line with the European guidelines, only 14 and 13 patients remained eligible (3 %). In clinics with younger populations, a significant percentage of potentially eligible patients are likely to have the APOE ε4/4 genotype. These findings are important to inform the implementation of anti-Aβ treatments.

Lecanemab和donanemab是首批在欧洲获得批准的抗β治疗药物。资格标准很严格。, APOE ε4/4携带者除外。在公共卫生保健领域的成功实施取决于对首先推出治疗方法的机构(具有早期疾病阶段的专门记忆诊所)的合格率的准确估计。我们应用适当使用建议(AUR)来评估瑞典三级记忆诊所的治疗资格,该诊所常规进行a β和APOE评估。在整个队列(N = 410)中,分别有26例和25例患者符合lecanemab和donanemab的AUR标准(6%;组间部分重叠)。在根据欧洲指南排除APOE ε4/4携带者后,只有14例和13例患者仍然符合条件(3%)。在年轻人群的诊所中,有很大比例的潜在合格患者可能具有APOE ε4/4基因型。这些发现对抗a β治疗的实施具有重要意义。
{"title":"Preparing for the implementation of anti-amyloid therapies in Europe: Assessing real-world eligibility for lecanemab and donanemab in a Swedish memory clinic.","authors":"Anna Rosenberg, Alina Solomon, Alexandre Bonnard, Makrina Daniilidou, Göran Hagman, Anette Hall, Anna Matton, Ulf Öhlund-Wistbacka, Eric Westman, Miia Kivipelto","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100476","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100476","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lecanemab and donanemab are the first anti-Aβ treatments to receive approval in Europe. Eligibility criteria are strict, eg., APOE ε4/4 carriers are excluded. Successful implementation in public healthcare hinges on accurate estimates of eligibility rates in settings which will be the first to roll out the treatments (specialized memory clinics with early disease stages). We applied the appropriate use recommendations (AUR) to assess treatment eligibility in a Swedish tertiary memory clinic where Aβ and APOE assessments are routinely performed. Of the full cohort (N = 410), 26 and 25 patients met the AUR criteria for lecanemab and donanemab, respectively (6 %; partial overlap between the groups). After excluding APOE ε4/4 carriers in line with the European guidelines, only 14 and 13 patients remained eligible (3 %). In clinics with younger populations, a significant percentage of potentially eligible patients are likely to have the APOE ε4/4 genotype. These findings are important to inform the implementation of anti-Aβ treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"13 3","pages":"100476"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12835597/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145990571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The influence of bapineuzumab and semagacestat on rapid progressors: A retrospective cohort study. 巴哌珠单抗和西马加司他对快速进展的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
IF 7.8 Q2 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100483
Kristofer Harris, Madison Shyer, Dulin Wang, Elizabeth He, Matias Cattani, Catherine Zhang, Christine M Farrell, Xiaoqian Jiang, Yejin Kim, Paul E Schulz
<p><strong>Background: </strong>A subset of Alzheimer's disease patients progresses much more rapidly than average. These rapid progressors exhibit accelerated cognitive and functional decline. Potential differences in Alzheimer's biomarkers for rapid progressors and their responses to disease-modifying treatments remain poorly understood, with previous clinical trials and studies producing limited biomarker data and inconsistent results.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Examine differences in rapid progressor versus non-rapid progressor outcomes in two AD treatment trials (bapineuzumab and semagacestat) and investigate cognitive and biomarker progression in the placebo groups.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four randomized, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trials from the Center for Global Clinical Research Data (Semagacestat) and the Yale University Open Data Access Project (Bapineuzumab).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>4,902 patients (2,355 in bapineuzumab trials, 2,647 in semagacestat trials). Rapid progressors were operationally defined as the 10% of patients with the largest changes in cognitive scores from baseline to trial end.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Bapineuzumab (monoclonal antibody) and Semagacestat (γ-secretase inhibitor).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Cognitive assessments (CDR-SB, MMSE, ADAS-Cog, ADCS-ADL) and biological markers (CSF and plasma levels, MRI, FDG PET Scan, and Amyloid PET Scan) at baseline and endpoint.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rapid progressors showed distinct baseline characteristics in both the bapineuzumab and semagacestat trials: younger age (61.27 vs 63.14 years, p=0.008; and, 72.64 v. 73.64 years, p=0.046), a higher proportion of APOE4 carriers (87.6% vs 41.4%, p<0.001; and, 85.2% vs 49.3%, p = 0.022), and greater cognitive impairment across all measures (p<0.001). Both progression groups demonstrated improvement in specific biomarkers with treatment, though with different patterns. With bapineuzumab according to Conditional Average Treatment Effect analysis, rapid progressors showed biomarker improvement in amyloid CSF, p-Tau CSF, and amyloid PET scan, while non-rapid progressors demonstrated biomarker improvements in p-Tau CSF, amyloid PET, and MRI. With semagacestat, rapid progressors showed improvements in amyloid CSF and plasma while non-rapid progressors showed improvements in amyloid CSF, FDG PET, and MRI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides crucial insights for clinical practice and trial design. The distinct response patterns between progression groups suggest that early identification and balancing of RPs between groups could improve clinical trial efficiency. The findings support the development of personalized treatment approaches for rapid progressors, who have aggressive disease progression. These results may significantly modify clinical trial design and patient care in Alzheimer's dis
背景:一部分阿尔茨海默病患者的病情进展比平均水平快得多。这些快速进展者表现出加速的认知和功能衰退。阿尔茨海默病快速进展者生物标志物的潜在差异及其对疾病改善治疗的反应仍然知之甚少,先前的临床试验和研究产生有限的生物标志物数据和不一致的结果。目的:研究两项阿尔茨海默病治疗试验(巴哌珠单抗和semagacestat)快速进展和非快速进展结果的差异,并调查安慰剂组的认知和生物标志物进展。设计:回顾性队列研究。环境:来自全球临床研究数据中心(Semagacestat)和耶鲁大学开放数据获取项目(Bapineuzumab)的四项随机、双盲、3期临床试验。参与者:4,902例患者(2,355例巴哌珠单抗试验,2,647例semagacestat试验)。快速进展者被手术定义为从基线到试验结束认知评分变化最大的10%的患者。干预:巴单抗(单克隆抗体)和Semagacestat (γ-分泌酶抑制剂)。测量:基线和终点的认知评估(CDR-SB、MMSE、ADAS-Cog、ADCS-ADL)和生物标志物(CSF和血浆水平、MRI、FDG PET扫描和淀粉样蛋白PET扫描)。结果:快速进展者在巴哌珠单抗和semagacestat试验中均显示出明显的基线特征:年龄更小(61.27 vs 63.14岁,p=0.008; 72.64 vs 73.64岁,p=0.046), APOE4携带者比例更高(87.6% vs 41.4%)。进展组之间不同的反应模式表明,早期识别和平衡组间rp可以提高临床试验效率。该研究结果支持针对具有侵袭性疾病进展的快速进展患者开发个性化治疗方法。这些结果可能会显著改变阿尔茨海默病的临床试验设计和患者护理。
{"title":"The influence of bapineuzumab and semagacestat on rapid progressors: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Kristofer Harris, Madison Shyer, Dulin Wang, Elizabeth He, Matias Cattani, Catherine Zhang, Christine M Farrell, Xiaoqian Jiang, Yejin Kim, Paul E Schulz","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100483","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100483","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;A subset of Alzheimer's disease patients progresses much more rapidly than average. These rapid progressors exhibit accelerated cognitive and functional decline. Potential differences in Alzheimer's biomarkers for rapid progressors and their responses to disease-modifying treatments remain poorly understood, with previous clinical trials and studies producing limited biomarker data and inconsistent results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;Examine differences in rapid progressor versus non-rapid progressor outcomes in two AD treatment trials (bapineuzumab and semagacestat) and investigate cognitive and biomarker progression in the placebo groups.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design: &lt;/strong&gt;Retrospective cohort study.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Setting: &lt;/strong&gt;Four randomized, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trials from the Center for Global Clinical Research Data (Semagacestat) and the Yale University Open Data Access Project (Bapineuzumab).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Participants: &lt;/strong&gt;4,902 patients (2,355 in bapineuzumab trials, 2,647 in semagacestat trials). Rapid progressors were operationally defined as the 10% of patients with the largest changes in cognitive scores from baseline to trial end.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Intervention: &lt;/strong&gt;Bapineuzumab (monoclonal antibody) and Semagacestat (γ-secretase inhibitor).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Measurements: &lt;/strong&gt;Cognitive assessments (CDR-SB, MMSE, ADAS-Cog, ADCS-ADL) and biological markers (CSF and plasma levels, MRI, FDG PET Scan, and Amyloid PET Scan) at baseline and endpoint.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Rapid progressors showed distinct baseline characteristics in both the bapineuzumab and semagacestat trials: younger age (61.27 vs 63.14 years, p=0.008; and, 72.64 v. 73.64 years, p=0.046), a higher proportion of APOE4 carriers (87.6% vs 41.4%, p&lt;0.001; and, 85.2% vs 49.3%, p = 0.022), and greater cognitive impairment across all measures (p&lt;0.001). Both progression groups demonstrated improvement in specific biomarkers with treatment, though with different patterns. With bapineuzumab according to Conditional Average Treatment Effect analysis, rapid progressors showed biomarker improvement in amyloid CSF, p-Tau CSF, and amyloid PET scan, while non-rapid progressors demonstrated biomarker improvements in p-Tau CSF, amyloid PET, and MRI. With semagacestat, rapid progressors showed improvements in amyloid CSF and plasma while non-rapid progressors showed improvements in amyloid CSF, FDG PET, and MRI.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;This study provides crucial insights for clinical practice and trial design. The distinct response patterns between progression groups suggest that early identification and balancing of RPs between groups could improve clinical trial efficiency. The findings support the development of personalized treatment approaches for rapid progressors, who have aggressive disease progression. These results may significantly modify clinical trial design and patient care in Alzheimer's dis","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"13 3","pages":"100483"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12859249/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146019620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predicting cognitive decline: Comparative analysis of ANU-ADRI, CAIDE, CogDrisk, LIBRA, LIBRA2, UKBDRS and Lancet based dementia risk scores in the HUNT study. 预测认知能力下降:HUNT研究中ANU-ADRI、CAIDE、cogrisk、LIBRA、LIBRA2、UKBDRS和Lancet痴呆风险评分的比较分析
IF 7.8 Q2 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2026-02-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100524
Josephine Stubs, Geir Selbæk, Bjørn Heine Strand, Gill Livingston, Kaarin J Anstey, Kay Deckers, Mika Kivimäki, Steinar Krokstad, Fiona E Mathews, Ellen Melbye Langballe

Objective: To evaluate and compare the predictive value of eight dementia risk scores for late-life cognitive function and cognitive decline; ANU-ADRI, CAIDE, CogDrisk, LIBRA, LIBRA2, UKBDRS(-APOE), and a Lancet commission-based risk score.

Methods: Using Norwegian Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) data, we calculated risk scores from lifestyle and health data of 7221 dementia-free participants (mean age: 76.8 years, 54.1% female) collected in HUNT3 (2006-2008). Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale (MoCA) 11 years later in HUNT4 70+, and reassessed in 4716 participants 4 years thereafter. Associations between continuous risk scores or risk score tertiles, cognition and cognitive decline were examined using linear mixed-effects models. Logistic regression models were used to test associations between risk scores and a ≥ 3-point decline in MoCA scores.

Results: All risk scores were significantly associated with cognitive function and cognitive decline. Associations with cognitive function ranged from UKBDRS β per 1SD=-1.61(95%CI:-1.72,-1.51) to CAIDE (β=-0.74;95%CI:-0.82,-0.67), and with yearly cognitive decline from Lancet (β=-0.23;95%CI:-0.27,-0.18) to CAIDE (β=-0.04;95%CI:-0.07,-0.02). High-low risk group differences in cognitive function were largest for CogDrisk (β=-3.04;95%CI:-3.27,-2.81), LIBRA (β=-3.04;95%CI:-3.27,-2.80) and lowest for CAIDE (β=-1.65;95%CI:-1.86,-1.44). High-risk groups showed the steepest decline for UKBDRS-APOE (β=-0.43;95%CI:-0.52,-0.34), Lancet (β=-0.39;95%CI:-0.48,-0.30), and LIBRA (β=-0.38;95%CI:-0.47,-0.28). All scores predicted ≥3-point decline modestly: AUCs were highest for UKBDRS (AUC=0.61;95%CI:0.60,0.63), UKBDRS-APOE (0.61;95%CI:0.60,0.63), CogDrisk (0.60;95%CI:0.58,0.62), and Lancet (0.60;95%CI:0.58,0.61), but none outperformed a model including age and education alone (0.61;95%CI:0.60,0.63).

Conclusion: Risk scores captured meaningful gradients in cognition and decline but offered limited discriminatory accuracy beyond demographics, supporting their use for prevention-oriented risk profiling rather than prediction.

目的:评价和比较8种痴呆风险评分对老年认知功能和认知能力下降的预测价值;ANU-ADRI, CAIDE, cogrisk, LIBRA, LIBRA2, UKBDRS(-APOE),以及柳叶刀委员会风险评分。方法:使用挪威Trøndelag健康研究(HUNT)的数据,根据HUNT3(2006-2008)收集的7221名无痴呆参与者(平均年龄:76.8岁,女性54.1%)的生活方式和健康数据计算风险评分。11年后使用蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)对HUNT4 70+的认知功能进行评估,并在4年后对4716名参与者进行重新评估。使用线性混合效应模型检验连续风险评分或风险评分分位数与认知和认知能力下降之间的关系。Logistic回归模型用于检验风险评分与MoCA评分下降≥3分之间的相关性。结果:所有风险评分均与认知功能和认知能力下降显著相关。与认知功能的关联范围从UKBDRS β / 1SD=-1.61(95%CI:-1.72,-1.51)到CAIDE (β=-0.74, 95%CI:-0.82,-0.67),以及从Lancet (β=-0.23, 95%CI:-0.27,-0.18)到CAIDE (β=-0.04, 95%CI:-0.07,-0.02)的年度认知衰退。高-低危组认知功能差异最大的是cogrisk (β=-3.04;95%CI:-3.27,-2.81)、LIBRA (β=-3.04;95%CI:-3.27,-2.80),最低的是CAIDE (β=-1.65;95%CI:-1.86,-1.44)。高危组UKBDRS-APOE (β=-0.43;95%CI:-0.52,-0.34)、Lancet (β=-0.39;95%CI:-0.48,-0.30)和LIBRA (β=-0.38;95%CI:-0.47,-0.28)的下降幅度最大。所有评分均适度预测≥3点的下降:AUC最高的是UKBDRS (AUC=0.61, 95%CI:0.60,0.63)、UKBDRS- apoe (0.61, 95%CI:0.60,0.63)、CogDrisk (0.60, 95%CI:0.58,0.62)和Lancet (0.60, 95%CI:0.58,0.61),但没有一个优于单独包括年龄和教育的模型(0.61,95%CI:0.60,0.63)。结论:风险评分在认知和衰退方面捕获了有意义的梯度,但在人口统计学之外提供了有限的歧视性准确性,支持其用于以预防为导向的风险概况而不是预测。
{"title":"Predicting cognitive decline: Comparative analysis of ANU-ADRI, CAIDE, CogDrisk, LIBRA, LIBRA2, UKBDRS and Lancet based dementia risk scores in the HUNT study.","authors":"Josephine Stubs, Geir Selbæk, Bjørn Heine Strand, Gill Livingston, Kaarin J Anstey, Kay Deckers, Mika Kivimäki, Steinar Krokstad, Fiona E Mathews, Ellen Melbye Langballe","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100524","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100524","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate and compare the predictive value of eight dementia risk scores for late-life cognitive function and cognitive decline; ANU-ADRI, CAIDE, CogDrisk, LIBRA, LIBRA2, UKBDRS(-APOE), and a Lancet commission-based risk score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Norwegian Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) data, we calculated risk scores from lifestyle and health data of 7221 dementia-free participants (mean age: 76.8 years, 54.1% female) collected in HUNT3 (2006-2008). Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale (MoCA) 11 years later in HUNT4 70+, and reassessed in 4716 participants 4 years thereafter. Associations between continuous risk scores or risk score tertiles, cognition and cognitive decline were examined using linear mixed-effects models. Logistic regression models were used to test associations between risk scores and a ≥ 3-point decline in MoCA scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All risk scores were significantly associated with cognitive function and cognitive decline. Associations with cognitive function ranged from UKBDRS β <sub>per 1SD</sub>=-1.61(95%CI:-1.72,-1.51) to CAIDE (β=-0.74;95%CI:-0.82,-0.67), and with yearly cognitive decline from Lancet (β=-0.23;95%CI:-0.27,-0.18) to CAIDE (β=-0.04;95%CI:-0.07,-0.02). High-low risk group differences in cognitive function were largest for CogDrisk (β=-3.04;95%CI:-3.27,-2.81), LIBRA (β=-3.04;95%CI:-3.27,-2.80) and lowest for CAIDE (β=-1.65;95%CI:-1.86,-1.44). High-risk groups showed the steepest decline for UKBDRS-APOE (β=-0.43;95%CI:-0.52,-0.34), Lancet (β=-0.39;95%CI:-0.48,-0.30), and LIBRA (β=-0.38;95%CI:-0.47,-0.28). All scores predicted ≥3-point decline modestly: AUCs were highest for UKBDRS (AUC=0.61;95%CI:0.60,0.63), UKBDRS-APOE (0.61;95%CI:0.60,0.63), CogDrisk (0.60;95%CI:0.58,0.62), and Lancet (0.60;95%CI:0.58,0.61), but none outperformed a model including age and education alone (0.61;95%CI:0.60,0.63).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Risk scores captured meaningful gradients in cognition and decline but offered limited discriminatory accuracy beyond demographics, supporting their use for prevention-oriented risk profiling rather than prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"13 4","pages":"100524"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12966730/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147327166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Longitudinal subcortical volume changes and their correlations with multiple PET and fluid biomarkers in dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease. 显性遗传性阿尔茨海默病的纵向皮质下体积变化及其与多种PET和液体生物标志物的相关性
IF 7.8 Q2 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2026-02-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100513
Il Han Choo, Hoyoung Park, Brian A Gordon, Randall J Bateman

Background: Alzheimer's disease postmortem studies demonstrate that amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles are present in subcortical regions.

Objective: To investigate longitudinal subcortical structural changes in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease in relation to multiple PET and fluid biomarkers.

Design: Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Network (DIAN) Observational study SETTING: Multicenter study PARTICIPANTS: Participants were identified as mutation-carriers of pathologic variants in presenilin-1, presenilin-2, or amyloid precursor protein and as non-carriers from the same families as the mutation-carriers. They underwent baseline and 2 and more times longitudinal follow-up assessments of multiple biomarkers MEASUREMENTS: Participants underwent structural MRI, ¹¹C-Pittsburgh Compound B PET, ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET, and CSF and plasma assessments. Rates of biomarker change as a function of estimated years to symptom onset were estimated using multivariate linear mixed-effects models, and longitudinal associations between subcortical atrophy and multiple biomarkers were evaluated.

Results: A total of 601 participants completed one or more clinical evaluations, with up to eight annual visits. Mutation carriers showed significantly greater longitudinal atrophy in the left amygdala, bilateral thalamus, putamen, nucleus accumbens, and hippocampus compared with non-carriers (Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.05). The earliest divergence was observed 13.2 years before the expected symptom onset in the right nucleus accumbens, following amyloid-β (Aβ) accumulation in the right thalamus that began 23.8 years before onset. Among carriers, atrophy in the right thalamus, bilateral putamen, and bilateral nucleus accumbens was significantly associated with region-specific or cortical Aβ accumulation, as well as with CSF Aβ42, Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, total tau, and phosphorylated tau (Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The present findings may provide a unique and well-characterized model for investigating the temporal ordering of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers.

背景:阿尔茨海默病的死后研究表明,淀粉样斑块和神经原纤维缠结存在于皮层下区域。目的:探讨常染色体显性阿尔茨海默病皮层下纵向结构变化与多种PET和液体生物标志物的关系。设计:显性遗传性阿尔茨海默病网络(DIAN)观察性研究设置:多中心研究参与者:参与者被确定为早老素-1、早老素-2或淀粉样前体蛋白病理变异的突变携带者,以及与突变携带者来自同一家族的非携带者。他们接受了基线和2次以上的多种生物标志物的纵向随访评估。测量方法:参与者接受了结构MRI、¹¹c -匹兹堡化合物B PET、¹⁸f -氟脱氧葡萄糖PET、脑脊液和血浆评估。使用多元线性混合效应模型估计了生物标志物随估计年份到症状发作的变化率,并评估了皮质下萎缩与多种生物标志物之间的纵向关联。结果:共有601名参与者完成了一项或多项临床评估,每年最多八次就诊。突变携带者与非携带者相比,左侧杏仁核、双侧丘脑、壳核、伏隔核和海马的纵向萎缩明显更大(bonferroni校正p < 0.05)。最早的分化是在右侧伏隔核预期症状出现前13.2年观察到的,随后是在发病前23.8年开始在右侧丘脑中积累淀粉样蛋白-β (Aβ)。在携带者中,右丘脑、双侧壳核和双侧伏隔核的萎缩与区域特异性或皮质性Aβ积累以及脑脊液Aβ42、Aβ42/Aβ40比值、总tau蛋白和磷酸化tau蛋白显著相关(bonferroni校正p < 0.05)。结论:目前的研究结果可能为研究阿尔茨海默病生物标志物的时间顺序提供了一个独特的、具有良好特征的模型。
{"title":"Longitudinal subcortical volume changes and their correlations with multiple PET and fluid biomarkers in dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Il Han Choo, Hoyoung Park, Brian A Gordon, Randall J Bateman","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100513","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100513","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alzheimer's disease postmortem studies demonstrate that amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles are present in subcortical regions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate longitudinal subcortical structural changes in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease in relation to multiple PET and fluid biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Network (DIAN) Observational study SETTING: Multicenter study PARTICIPANTS: Participants were identified as mutation-carriers of pathologic variants in presenilin-1, presenilin-2, or amyloid precursor protein and as non-carriers from the same families as the mutation-carriers. They underwent baseline and 2 and more times longitudinal follow-up assessments of multiple biomarkers MEASUREMENTS: Participants underwent structural MRI, ¹¹C-Pittsburgh Compound B PET, ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET, and CSF and plasma assessments. Rates of biomarker change as a function of estimated years to symptom onset were estimated using multivariate linear mixed-effects models, and longitudinal associations between subcortical atrophy and multiple biomarkers were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 601 participants completed one or more clinical evaluations, with up to eight annual visits. Mutation carriers showed significantly greater longitudinal atrophy in the left amygdala, bilateral thalamus, putamen, nucleus accumbens, and hippocampus compared with non-carriers (Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.05). The earliest divergence was observed 13.2 years before the expected symptom onset in the right nucleus accumbens, following amyloid-β (Aβ) accumulation in the right thalamus that began 23.8 years before onset. Among carriers, atrophy in the right thalamus, bilateral putamen, and bilateral nucleus accumbens was significantly associated with region-specific or cortical Aβ accumulation, as well as with CSF Aβ42, Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, total tau, and phosphorylated tau (Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present findings may provide a unique and well-characterized model for investigating the temporal ordering of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"13 4","pages":"100513"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12964006/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147322067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Neuronal autoantibodies in neurodegenerative dementia: From evidence to clinical framework. 神经退行性痴呆的神经元自身抗体:从证据到临床框架。
IF 7.8 Q2 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2026-02-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100515
Heya Luan, Xiaodong Han, Chang Xu, Aidi Shan, Xin Wang, Shaoqi Li, Qi Yao, Tong Cui, Jinxuan Guo, Boye Wen, Yao Sun, Chuqiao Li, Qingyuan Sun, Cuibai Wei

Neuronal autoantibodies, including against neuronal surface receptors or intracellular antigens, are established pathogenic mediators and therapeutic targets in autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS). These antibodies are now increasingly reported in patients with clinically diagnosed neurodegenerative dementia, prompting re-evaluation of a neurodegenerative etiology. Within neurodegenerative trajectories, whether such antibodies act as pathogenic drivers, non-causal markers, or immune modulators remains unresolved, and heterogeneous cohorts, assays, and endpoints limit inference and clinical translation. This review integrates current research at the intersection of autoimmunity and neurodegeneration and highlights accumulating evidence for a biological continuum. This model suggests that antibody-mediated mechanisms may extend beyond acute inflammation, with sustained exposure contributing to time-dependent neurodegeneration. To facilitate clinical translation, we advance a standardized diagnostic workflow comprising three sequential stages: (i) a pretest-probability triage that defines high-risk constellations prompting antibody testing, stratifies patients accordingly; (ii) a specimen-and-assay pathway for standardized testing workflow and structured interpretation of results; and (iii) post-test integrated analysis to adjudicate pathogenic relevance based on phenotype-antibody concordance. By bridging observational research to clinical decision-making, the framework supports identification of an immunologically modulated neurodegenerative subtype with potential for therapeutic intervention, while reducing false positives and avoiding non-essential immunotherapy in low-probability contexts.

神经元自身抗体,包括针对神经元表面受体或细胞内抗原的抗体,是自身免疫性脑炎(AIE)和副肿瘤神经综合征(PNS)中公认的致病介质和治疗靶点。这些抗体现在越来越多地在临床诊断为神经退行性痴呆的患者中报道,促使对神经退行性病因的重新评估。在神经退行性轨迹中,这些抗体是否作为致病驱动因素、非因果标记物或免疫调节剂仍未解决,异质队列、测定和终点限制了推断和临床转化。这篇综述整合了当前在自身免疫和神经退行性变交叉领域的研究,并强调了生物连续体的积累证据。该模型表明,抗体介导的机制可能超出急性炎症,持续暴露会导致时间依赖性神经变性。为了促进临床翻译,我们提出了一个标准化的诊断工作流程,包括三个连续的阶段:(i)检测前概率分类,定义高风险星座,提示抗体检测,相应分层患者;(ii)用于标准化测试工作流程和结构化结果解释的样本和分析途径;(iii)测试后综合分析,根据表型-抗体一致性判断致病相关性。通过将观察性研究与临床决策相结合,该框架支持识别具有治疗干预潜力的免疫调节神经退行性亚型,同时减少假阳性并避免在低概率情况下进行非必要的免疫治疗。
{"title":"Neuronal autoantibodies in neurodegenerative dementia: From evidence to clinical framework.","authors":"Heya Luan, Xiaodong Han, Chang Xu, Aidi Shan, Xin Wang, Shaoqi Li, Qi Yao, Tong Cui, Jinxuan Guo, Boye Wen, Yao Sun, Chuqiao Li, Qingyuan Sun, Cuibai Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100515","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100515","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuronal autoantibodies, including against neuronal surface receptors or intracellular antigens, are established pathogenic mediators and therapeutic targets in autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS). These antibodies are now increasingly reported in patients with clinically diagnosed neurodegenerative dementia, prompting re-evaluation of a neurodegenerative etiology. Within neurodegenerative trajectories, whether such antibodies act as pathogenic drivers, non-causal markers, or immune modulators remains unresolved, and heterogeneous cohorts, assays, and endpoints limit inference and clinical translation. This review integrates current research at the intersection of autoimmunity and neurodegeneration and highlights accumulating evidence for a biological continuum. This model suggests that antibody-mediated mechanisms may extend beyond acute inflammation, with sustained exposure contributing to time-dependent neurodegeneration. To facilitate clinical translation, we advance a standardized diagnostic workflow comprising three sequential stages: (i) a pretest-probability triage that defines high-risk constellations prompting antibody testing, stratifies patients accordingly; (ii) a specimen-and-assay pathway for standardized testing workflow and structured interpretation of results; and (iii) post-test integrated analysis to adjudicate pathogenic relevance based on phenotype-antibody concordance. By bridging observational research to clinical decision-making, the framework supports identification of an immunologically modulated neurodegenerative subtype with potential for therapeutic intervention, while reducing false positives and avoiding non-essential immunotherapy in low-probability contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"13 5","pages":"100515"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12966672/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147322227","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Memory Consolidation and ARIA in Individuals Receiving Anti-amyloid Monoclonal Antibodies. 接受抗淀粉样蛋白单克隆抗体个体的记忆巩固和ARIA。
IF 7.8 Q2 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2026-02-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100519
Marc W Haut, Camila Vieira Ligo Teixeira, Patrick D Worhunsky, Rashi I Mehta, Joseph E Malone, Melanie Ward, Cierra M Keith, Holly E Phelps, Stephanie Pockl, Nafiisah Rajabalee, Khalid Sharif, Gary Marano, Pierre-Francois D'Haese, Ali R Rezai

Amyloid related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) are the most significant risk associated with the use of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies (MAB) for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Currently, the presence of the APOE ε4 allele is the best predictor for the development of ARIA. However, the degree of baseline memory impairment has not been fully explored as a risk factor for ARIA. Here, we examined MAB outcomes in a memory clinic population and compared patients with AD who developed ARIA to a case-matched group who did not develop ARIA. Participants who developed ARIA had greater numbers of recall intrusions and false positives, both markers for memory consolidation, at baseline than those who did not develop ARIA. We also observed greater baseline hippocampal and supplementary motor cortical atrophy with ARIA. These differences remained when controlling for the APOE ε4 allele and the presence of pretreatment microhemorrhages. Further investigation of memory impairment and associated brain atrophy is warranted to understand ARIA risk and MAB outcomes in AD.

淀粉样蛋白相关成像异常(ARIA)是与使用抗淀粉样蛋白单克隆抗体(MAB)治疗阿尔茨海默病(AD)相关的最显著风险。目前,APOE ε4等位基因的存在是预测ARIA发生的最佳指标。然而,基线记忆障碍的程度尚未被充分探讨作为ARIA的危险因素。在这里,我们检查了记忆诊所人群的MAB结果,并将发生ARIA的AD患者与未发生ARIA的病例匹配组进行了比较。与没有发生ARIA的参与者相比,发生ARIA的参与者有更多的回忆入侵和假阳性,这两种记忆巩固的标记在基线上都是如此。我们还观察到ARIA患者更大的基线海马和辅助运动皮质萎缩。当控制APOE ε4等位基因和预处理微出血的存在时,这些差异仍然存在。有必要进一步研究记忆障碍和相关脑萎缩,以了解AD患者的ARIA风险和MAB结果。
{"title":"Memory Consolidation and ARIA in Individuals Receiving Anti-amyloid Monoclonal Antibodies.","authors":"Marc W Haut, Camila Vieira Ligo Teixeira, Patrick D Worhunsky, Rashi I Mehta, Joseph E Malone, Melanie Ward, Cierra M Keith, Holly E Phelps, Stephanie Pockl, Nafiisah Rajabalee, Khalid Sharif, Gary Marano, Pierre-Francois D'Haese, Ali R Rezai","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100519","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100519","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amyloid related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) are the most significant risk associated with the use of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies (MAB) for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Currently, the presence of the APOE ε4 allele is the best predictor for the development of ARIA. However, the degree of baseline memory impairment has not been fully explored as a risk factor for ARIA. Here, we examined MAB outcomes in a memory clinic population and compared patients with AD who developed ARIA to a case-matched group who did not develop ARIA. Participants who developed ARIA had greater numbers of recall intrusions and false positives, both markers for memory consolidation, at baseline than those who did not develop ARIA. We also observed greater baseline hippocampal and supplementary motor cortical atrophy with ARIA. These differences remained when controlling for the APOE ε4 allele and the presence of pretreatment microhemorrhages. Further investigation of memory impairment and associated brain atrophy is warranted to understand ARIA risk and MAB outcomes in AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"13 5","pages":"100519"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12966669/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147322255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Vascular stiffness predicts plasma markers of neurodegeneration among older African Americans. 血管硬度预测老年非裔美国人神经变性的血浆标志物。
IF 7.8 Q2 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2026-02-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100523
Miray Budak, Kevin S Heffernan, Victoria Paruzel, Soodeh Moallemian, Bernadette A Fausto, Nicholas Ashton, Henrik Zetterberg, Fanny M Elahi, Mark A Gluck

Background: Vascular health is a critical and potentially modifiable determinant of Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk, yet its contribution to early neurodegenerative processes remains incompletely understood, particularly among African Americans, who experience a disproportionate AD burden. Estimated pulse wave velocity (ePWV), derived from age and blood pressure, provides a scalable index of vascular stiffness.

Objectives: To examine associations between vascular stiffness and plasma biomarkers of AD-related neurodegeneration in older African Americans.

Design: Cross-sectional observational study.

Setting: Community-based aging cohort study conducted at an academic research center.

Participants: A total of 145 cognitively unimpaired older African Americans (mean age=71.18±6.83 years; 110 women).

Measurements: ePWV was calculated using validated equations based on age and blood pressure. Plasma biomarkers included phosphorylated tau217 (p-tau217; N=145), phosphorylated tau231 (p-tau231; N=126), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP; N=126), neurofilament light chain (NfL; N=126), and amyloid-β42/40 ratio (Aβ42/40; N=126). Multivariable regression models adjusted for sex, education, pulse pressure, waist-to-hip ratio, global cognition, and hypertension status.

Results: Higher ePWV was significantly associated with higher plasma concentrations of p-tau217 (β=0.34, p=.006), GFAP (β=0.55, p<.001), and NfL (β=0.52, p<.001), but not with p-tau231 and Aβ42/40 (p>.05).

Conclusions: Greater vascular stiffness, indexed by elevated ePWV, was associated with circulating markers of tau-related neurodegeneration, astrocytic activation, and axonal injury in cognitively unimpaired older African Americans. The absence of association with p-tau231 and Aβ42/40 suggests preferential effects on neurovascular damage and later tau-related processes, but no primary effect on biomarkers related to Aβ pathology, still highlighting vascular health as a modifiable target for AD prevention.

背景:血管健康是阿尔茨海默病(AD)风险的关键和潜在可改变的决定因素,但其对早期神经退行性过程的贡献仍不完全清楚,特别是在经历不成比例的AD负担的非裔美国人中。估计脉搏波速度(ePWV),来自年龄和血压,提供了一个可伸缩的血管僵硬指数。目的:研究老年非裔美国人血管硬度与ad相关神经退行性变血浆生物标志物之间的关系。设计:横断面观察性研究。背景:在某学术研究中心进行的以社区为基础的老龄化队列研究。参与者:145名认知功能正常的老年非裔美国人(平均年龄=71.18±6.83岁;110名女性)。测量方法:ePWV采用基于年龄和血压的有效方程计算。血浆生物标志物包括磷酸化的tau217 (p-tau217, N=145)、磷酸化的tau231 (p-tau231, N=126)、胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP, N=126)、神经丝轻链(NfL, N=126)和淀粉样蛋白-β42/40比值(a -β42/40, N=126)。多变量回归模型校正了性别、教育程度、脉压、腰臀比、整体认知和高血压状态。结果:较高的ePWV与较高的血浆p-tau217 (β=0.34, p= 0.006)、GFAP (β=0.55, p.05)浓度显著相关。结论:在认知功能未受损的老年非裔美国人中,以ePWV升高为指标的更大的血管僵硬与tau相关神经变性、星形细胞激活和轴突损伤的循环标志物相关。缺乏与p-tau231和a β42/40的关联表明对神经血管损伤和后来的tau相关过程有优先作用,但对a β病理相关的生物标志物没有主要影响,仍然强调血管健康是AD预防的可改变靶标。
{"title":"Vascular stiffness predicts plasma markers of neurodegeneration among older African Americans.","authors":"Miray Budak, Kevin S Heffernan, Victoria Paruzel, Soodeh Moallemian, Bernadette A Fausto, Nicholas Ashton, Henrik Zetterberg, Fanny M Elahi, Mark A Gluck","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100523","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100523","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vascular health is a critical and potentially modifiable determinant of Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk, yet its contribution to early neurodegenerative processes remains incompletely understood, particularly among African Americans, who experience a disproportionate AD burden. Estimated pulse wave velocity (ePWV), derived from age and blood pressure, provides a scalable index of vascular stiffness.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine associations between vascular stiffness and plasma biomarkers of AD-related neurodegeneration in older African Americans.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community-based aging cohort study conducted at an academic research center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 145 cognitively unimpaired older African Americans (mean age=71.18±6.83 years; 110 women).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>ePWV was calculated using validated equations based on age and blood pressure. Plasma biomarkers included phosphorylated tau217 (p-tau217; N=145), phosphorylated tau231 (p-tau231; N=126), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP; N=126), neurofilament light chain (NfL; N=126), and amyloid-β42/40 ratio (Aβ42/40; N=126). Multivariable regression models adjusted for sex, education, pulse pressure, waist-to-hip ratio, global cognition, and hypertension status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher ePWV was significantly associated with higher plasma concentrations of p-tau217 (β=0.34, p=.006), GFAP (β=0.55, p<.001), and NfL (β=0.52, p<.001), but not with p-tau231 and Aβ42/40 (p>.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Greater vascular stiffness, indexed by elevated ePWV, was associated with circulating markers of tau-related neurodegeneration, astrocytic activation, and axonal injury in cognitively unimpaired older African Americans. The absence of association with p-tau231 and Aβ42/40 suggests preferential effects on neurovascular damage and later tau-related processes, but no primary effect on biomarkers related to Aβ pathology, still highlighting vascular health as a modifiable target for AD prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"13 4","pages":"100523"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12964279/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147322237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nutritional supplements and cognition in healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. 营养补充剂对健康老年和轻度认知障碍患者认知的影响:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
IF 7.8 Q2 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2026-02-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100518
Xing Liu, Chenyi Yang, Xinyi Wang, Huihui Liao, Huan Liu, Ji Ma, Yi Sun, Haiyun Wang

Background: Nutritional supplementation is increasingly regarded as a potential strategy to preserve or enhance cognitive function in individuals with healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, its overall efficacy remains uncertain due to inconsistent findings across clinical trials.

Methods: In accordance with the guidelines outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Network Meta-Analyses, we conducted a comprehensive systematic search. Our inclusion criteria focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the impact of nutrient supplementation on cognitive function within healthy aging and MCI patients. The primary outcome of interest was the change in cognitive function, while the secondary outcome involved alterations in blood biochemical markers (e.g., homocysteine, vitamin B12, and serum folate levels).

Results: The meta-analysis results indicated that docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)+eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)+vitamin E+tryptophan+melatonin, as well as melatonin alone, significantly enhanced global cognitive function. Additionally, DHA, folic acid+DHA, and the DHA+EPA+vitamin E+tryptophan+melatonin were all effective in augmenting memory. DHA alone was found to be beneficial in improving processing speed, whereas vitamin D3 was associated with improvements in visuospatial function. Notably, sensitivity analyses revealed that while most domain-specific effects remained stable, the rankings of certain small-sample interventions were sensitive to study duration and sample size. Supplementation with folic acid, vitamin B12, and vitamin B6, whether administered individually or in combination, resulted in varying improvements in blood biomarkers, including homocysteine, vitamin B12, and serum folate levels.

Conclusions: Nutritional supplementation demonstrates nuanced, domain-specific benefits rather than universal cognitive enhancement. While specific multi-nutrient combinations show potential, their effects are significantly influenced by baseline cognitive status, age, and intervention duration. Our findings suggest that nutritional strategies should be tailored to individual cognitive profiles, emphasizing the need for personalized interventions and further high-quality, longitudinal trials to confirm long-term clinical impact.

背景:营养补充越来越被认为是保持或增强健康老龄化和轻度认知障碍(MCI)个体认知功能的潜在策略。然而,由于临床试验结果不一致,其总体疗效仍不确定。方法:根据网络荟萃分析系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目的指导方针,我们进行了全面的系统搜索。我们的纳入标准集中于随机对照试验(RCTs),这些试验研究了营养补充剂对健康老年人和轻度认知损伤患者认知功能的影响。研究的主要结局是认知功能的改变,而次要结局涉及血液生化指标的改变(例如,同型半胱氨酸、维生素B12和血清叶酸水平)。结果:荟萃分析结果显示,二十二碳六烯酸(DHA)+二十碳五烯酸(EPA)+维生素E+色氨酸+褪黑激素,以及单独褪黑激素均可显著增强整体认知功能。此外,DHA、叶酸+DHA、DHA+EPA+维生素E+色氨酸+褪黑素均能有效增强记忆。单独的DHA被发现有利于提高处理速度,而维生素D3则与视觉空间功能的改善有关。值得注意的是,敏感性分析显示,虽然大多数领域特异性效应保持稳定,但某些小样本干预措施的排名对研究持续时间和样本量敏感。补充叶酸、维生素B12和维生素B6,无论是单独给药还是联合给药,都能不同程度地改善血液生物标志物,包括同型半胱氨酸、维生素B12和血清叶酸水平。结论:营养补充剂表现出细微的、特定领域的益处,而不是普遍的认知增强。虽然特定的多种营养素组合显示出潜力,但其效果受到基线认知状况、年龄和干预持续时间的显著影响。我们的研究结果表明,营养策略应根据个人认知情况量身定制,强调个性化干预和进一步高质量的纵向试验的必要性,以确认长期临床影响。
{"title":"Nutritional supplements and cognition in healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Xing Liu, Chenyi Yang, Xinyi Wang, Huihui Liao, Huan Liu, Ji Ma, Yi Sun, Haiyun Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100518","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100518","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nutritional supplementation is increasingly regarded as a potential strategy to preserve or enhance cognitive function in individuals with healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, its overall efficacy remains uncertain due to inconsistent findings across clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In accordance with the guidelines outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Network Meta-Analyses, we conducted a comprehensive systematic search. Our inclusion criteria focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the impact of nutrient supplementation on cognitive function within healthy aging and MCI patients. The primary outcome of interest was the change in cognitive function, while the secondary outcome involved alterations in blood biochemical markers (e.g., homocysteine, vitamin B12, and serum folate levels).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis results indicated that docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)+eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)+vitamin E+tryptophan+melatonin, as well as melatonin alone, significantly enhanced global cognitive function. Additionally, DHA, folic acid+DHA, and the DHA+EPA+vitamin E+tryptophan+melatonin were all effective in augmenting memory. DHA alone was found to be beneficial in improving processing speed, whereas vitamin D3 was associated with improvements in visuospatial function. Notably, sensitivity analyses revealed that while most domain-specific effects remained stable, the rankings of certain small-sample interventions were sensitive to study duration and sample size. Supplementation with folic acid, vitamin B12, and vitamin B6, whether administered individually or in combination, resulted in varying improvements in blood biomarkers, including homocysteine, vitamin B12, and serum folate levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nutritional supplementation demonstrates nuanced, domain-specific benefits rather than universal cognitive enhancement. While specific multi-nutrient combinations show potential, their effects are significantly influenced by baseline cognitive status, age, and intervention duration. Our findings suggest that nutritional strategies should be tailored to individual cognitive profiles, emphasizing the need for personalized interventions and further high-quality, longitudinal trials to confirm long-term clinical impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"13 5","pages":"100518"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12966656/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147327080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevention of dementia using mobile phone applications (PRODEMOS) - a health-economic cost-utility analysis in people aged 55-75 years with low socio-economic status. 使用移动电话应用程序(PRODEMOS)预防痴呆症——对55-75岁低社会经济地位人群的健康经济成本效用分析。
IF 7.8 Q2 BUSINESS Pub Date : 2026-02-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100526
Ron Handels, Marieke Hoevenaar-Blom, Manshu Song, Carol Brayne, Eric Moll van Charante, Fiona E Matthews, Junfang Xu, Linus Jönsson, Nicola Coley, Rachael Brooks, Xuening Jian, Tingting Qin, Youxin Wang, Wei Wang, Edo Richard, Anders Wimo

Introduction: We aimed to explore the potential incremental cost-effectiveness of the PRODEMOS coach-supported mobile health intervention for primary prevention of dementia versus standard of care provided to people aged 55-75 years with low socio-economic status (SES) in the United Kingdom (UK), and any SES in China.

Methods: 12-18-month PRODEMOS trial (ISRCTN15986016) efficacy outcomes on hypertension, obesity, hypercholesterolemia, physical inactivity and smoking were extrapolated to lifetime impact on dementia onset, myocardial infarction, stroke and death using a health-economic open-source simulation model.

Results: Simulated outcomes showed dementia cases were avoided (UK = -206 (-658 to 281), China = -140 (-456 to 205) per 100,000 persons) and disease-free time was gained for dementia, myocardial infarction and stroke (mean months per person UK = 0.4, 0.0 and 0.0; China = 0.2, 0.0 and 0.0 respectively). Assuming a maximum intervention duration of 10 years with a 10 % annual non-adherence rate, the incremental net health benefit in the UK (-0.190) and China (-0.009) indicated a potential lack cost-effectiveness.

Limitations: Our method was limited by strong assumptions regarding causality and sustained effectiveness, lack of some country-specific input estimates, and the lack of probabilistic analysis.

Conclusion: The PRODEMOS coach-supported mobile health intervention for the primary prevention of dementia, aimed at people aged 55 to 75 years with low SES in the UK and those of any SES in China, may potentially lack cost-effectiveness in both countries. However, lack of data required strong assumptions regarding causality and sustained effectiveness, which limited policy recommendations.

前言:我们的目的是探讨PRODEMOS教练支持的移动健康干预对痴呆初级预防的潜在增量成本效益与提供给英国(UK) 55-75岁低社会经济地位(SES)人群的标准护理相比,以及中国任何社会经济地位低的人群。方法:采用健康-经济开源模拟模型,将12-18个月PRODEMOS试验(ISRCTN15986016)对高血压、肥胖、高胆固醇血症、缺乏运动和吸烟的疗效结果外推到对痴呆发病、心肌梗死、中风和死亡的终生影响。结果:模拟结果显示,避免了痴呆病例(英国= -206例(-658至281例),中国= -140例(-456至205例)/ 10万人),获得了痴呆、心肌梗死和中风的无病时间(人均平均月数英国= 0.4、0.0和0.0;中国分别= 0.2、0.0和0.0)。假设最大干预持续时间为10年,年不依从率为10%,英国(-0.190)和中国(-0.009)的增量净健康效益表明可能缺乏成本效益。局限性:我们的方法受到关于因果关系和持续有效性的强假设、缺乏一些国家特定投入估计和缺乏概率分析的限制。结论:PRODEMOS教练支持的针对英国55 - 75岁低社会经济地位人群和中国任何社会经济地位人群的初级预防痴呆的移动健康干预,可能在这两个国家都缺乏成本效益。然而,由于缺乏数据,需要对因果关系和持续有效性进行强有力的假设,这限制了政策建议。
{"title":"Prevention of dementia using mobile phone applications (PRODEMOS) - a health-economic cost-utility analysis in people aged 55-75 years with low socio-economic status.","authors":"Ron Handels, Marieke Hoevenaar-Blom, Manshu Song, Carol Brayne, Eric Moll van Charante, Fiona E Matthews, Junfang Xu, Linus Jönsson, Nicola Coley, Rachael Brooks, Xuening Jian, Tingting Qin, Youxin Wang, Wei Wang, Edo Richard, Anders Wimo","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100526","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100526","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to explore the potential incremental cost-effectiveness of the PRODEMOS coach-supported mobile health intervention for primary prevention of dementia versus standard of care provided to people aged 55-75 years with low socio-economic status (SES) in the United Kingdom (UK), and any SES in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>12-18-month PRODEMOS trial (ISRCTN15986016) efficacy outcomes on hypertension, obesity, hypercholesterolemia, physical inactivity and smoking were extrapolated to lifetime impact on dementia onset, myocardial infarction, stroke and death using a health-economic open-source simulation model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Simulated outcomes showed dementia cases were avoided (UK = -206 (-658 to 281), China = -140 (-456 to 205) per 100,000 persons) and disease-free time was gained for dementia, myocardial infarction and stroke (mean months per person UK = 0.4, 0.0 and 0.0; China = 0.2, 0.0 and 0.0 respectively). Assuming a maximum intervention duration of 10 years with a 10 % annual non-adherence rate, the incremental net health benefit in the UK (-0.190) and China (-0.009) indicated a potential lack cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Our method was limited by strong assumptions regarding causality and sustained effectiveness, lack of some country-specific input estimates, and the lack of probabilistic analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PRODEMOS coach-supported mobile health intervention for the primary prevention of dementia, aimed at people aged 55 to 75 years with low SES in the UK and those of any SES in China, may potentially lack cost-effectiveness in both countries. However, lack of data required strong assumptions regarding causality and sustained effectiveness, which limited policy recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"13 5","pages":"100526"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12966664/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147322166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1