The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease最新文献

Background: The accurate identification of individuals at risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) through blood-based biomarkers remains challenging.

Objectives: To evaluate the association between plasma amyloid-beta (Aβ)42/Aβ40 ratio and longitudinal amyloid deposition, clinical progression, brain atrophy and cognitive decline.

Design, setting and participants: This study extends the Fundació ACE Healthy Brain Initiative (FACEHBI) study (Barcelona, Spain), comprising 200 individuals with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) followed over five years.

Measurements: Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio was quantified using ABtest-MS, an antibody-free mass-spectrometry (MS) method. Survival analyses compared conversion risks to amyloid-PET positivity and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), in participants classified as low or high Aβ42/Aβ40, based on a cutoff of ≤ 0.241. Linear mixed-effect models evaluated associations of this biomarker with longitudinal changes in amyloid deposition, brain volume, and cognition.

Results: Low baseline Aβ42/Aβ40 was significantly associated with increased amyloid accumulation (β = 0.257, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.177-0.336, P < 0.001), and with higher risk of conversion to Aβ-PET positivity (Hazard ratio (HR) = 2.84, 95% CI 1.14-7.04, P = 0.025) and to MCI due to AD (HR = 3.25, 95% CI 1.17-9.01, P = 0.024). It was also linked to decreased hippocampal (β = -1.183, 95% CI -2.154 to -0.211, P = 0.017) and cortical (β = -75.921, 95% CI -151.728 to -0.113, P = 0.050) volumes, and increased ventricular volume (β = 35.175, 95% CI 18.559-51.790, P < 0.001). Moreover, lower baseline levels of Aβ42/Aβ40 were weakly associated with greater worsening in Mini-Mental State Examination and complex associative memory.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio is associated with future amyloid accumulation, brain atrophy, and conversion to prodromal AD in individuals with SCD. This biomarker may help characterize individuals with a higher likelihood of progression and could support earlier and more personalized strategies.

Background: Soluble amyloid β_1-42 (Aβ₄₂) signals via the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor to hyperphosphorylate tau in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Simufilam disrupts this pathogenic signaling by binding filamin A and disrupts its linkages with inflammatory receptors to reduce neuroinflammation. We assessed simufilam in two Phase 3 clinical trials in mild-to-moderate AD.

Methods: Participants were age 50-87 with Stage 4 or 5 CE, a mini-mental state exam (MMSE) ≥16 and ≤27 and a Clinical Dementia Rating Global Score (CDR-GS) of 0.5, 1 or 2. The criterion supporting AD pathology was plasma phosphorylated (p)-tau181 or prior amyloid PET. RETHINK randomized participants to simufilam 100 mg or placebo for 52 weeks. REFOCUS evaluated simufilam 50 and 100 mg versus placebo for 76 weeks. Co-primary endpoints were change from baseline on ADAS-Cog12 and ADCS-ADL. Sub-studies assessed exploratory plasma biomarkers and, in REFOCUS only, CSF and imaging biomarkers.

Results: Both trials failed to meet co-primary, secondary or exploratory biomarker endpoints. REFOCUS was terminated early, with 22% of participants still active in the trial. In the predefined mild subgroup in REFOCUS, simufilam was associated with slower cognitive decline than placebo through Week 64 (p = 0.019). This finding disappeared at Week 76 with 45% missing data and did not replicate in RETHINK. Favorable nominal exploratory post-hoc findings amongst participants with the highest half of screening plasma p-tau181 levels occurred in RETHINK but not REFOCUS. The plasma p-tau181 entry criterion did not reliably exclude amyloid PET negativity in the sub-study.

Conclusions: Simufilam did not meet co-primary or secondary endpoints in these Phase 3 trials. Simufilam was safe and well tolerated. Trials registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04994483 and NCT05026177.

Background: Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal degeneration (CBD) are 4-repeat tauopathies (4RT) presenting with overlapping syndromes. Imperfect clinicopathological associations increase sample-size demands in clinical trials. We test whether MRI can enrich trials for PSP/CBD and provide sensitive MRI-based outcome measures.

Methods: Longitudinal cohort analysis including participants from the 4 Repeat Tauopathy Neuroimaging Initiative (4RTNI) and phase 2/3 Davunetide trial (DAV). An MRI model trained on autopsy-confirmed cases predicted PSP (MRI-PSP) or CBD (MRI-CBD); corticobasal syndrome (CBS) with positive Alzheimer's biomarkers was reclassified. Clinical scales and MRI-derived thickness/volume were analyzed with linear mixed-effects models. We derived data-driven MRI-signatures (optimal regional combinations) to minimize required trial sample sizes.

Results: 206 participants from 4RTNI (n = 106 with Richardson's syndrome [RS], CBS, or nonfluent/agrammatic primary progressive aphasia [nfvPPA]) and DAV (n = 100 with RS). In 4RTNI, 49 participants were predicted MRI-PSP and 43 MRI-CBD. 76% of MRI-PSP had RS, 24% had CBS/nfvPPA; 66% of MRI-CBD had CBS. PSP and CBD signatures shared midbrain/pontine atrophy but differed in cortical involvement. PSP signature correlated strongly with 12-month change on the PSP Rating Scale (β = -0.59, p < 0.001). MRI-based signatures reduced the estimated sample sizes required to detect 30% reduction in progression over 12-months by 50% for MRI-PSP and 87% for MRI-CBD, compared with clinical outcomes. In DAV, feasibility was replicated.

Conclusion: MRI-derived models can identify PSP or CBD with high accuracy, and MRI-based signatures track progression more sensitively than established clinical outcomes. Incorporating these tools into therapeutic trial design could reduce sample sizes and enable more inclusive disease-modifying trials for 4RT.

Research on Alzheimer's disease (AD) has traditionally focused on the brain. However, emerging evidence indicates that the liver acts as a silent partner in neurodegeneration. As a core hub for metabolic and immune regulation, the liver communicates bidirectionally with the brain via the liver-brain axis, participating in the regulation of various neurophysiological processes, including neurotransmitter regulation, feeding behavior, and cognition. This review summarizes how liver-derived hepatokines, inflammatory mediators, and metabolic products modulate brain function. We highlight that liver dysfunction disrupts the expression of critical molecules-including fibroblast growth factor 21, insulin-like growth factor 1, lipopolysaccharide, and lipocalin-2-thereby driving AD progression by impairing pathological protein clearance, activating neuroinflammation, exacerbating insulin resistance and oxidative stress, and disrupting lipid metabolism. We also discuss the therapeutic potential of targeting the liver-brain axis through lifestyle interventions (e.g., exercise and diet) and pharmacological approaches, to identify novel strategies to delay AD progression. In summary, we underscore the pivotal role of the liver-brain axis in AD pathogenesis and propose it as a promising target for early diagnosis and innovative therapies.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a growing public health concern in Asia, with an increasing prevalence driven by demographic shifts and rising life expectancy. The introduction of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies such as lecanemab and donanemab marks a pivotal transition from symptomatic management of AD to disease-modifying approaches, but their clinical use requires careful monitoring for amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), a key safety consideration that presents either as vasogenic edema or as microhemorrhages and superficial siderosis. ARIA has been observed in varying frequencies across global and Asian clinical trial populations, underscoring the need for region-specific guidance. With our early clinical experiences in South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore serving as archetypes in Asia, we outline a framework for the detection and management of ARIA in Asian healthcare settings, accounting for disparities in imaging infrastructure, genetic factors, and clinician experience. Pre-treatment risk stratification, standardized imaging protocols, and severity-based treatment modifications are central to the framework, highlighting the critical role of multidisciplinary collaboration involving neurologists, geriatricians, psychiatrists, and radiologists in ensuring accurate detection and management of ARIA. Additionally, the paper highlights the role of pharmacovigilance, real-world evidence generation, physician education, and healthcare system preparedness in optimizing the safety and efficacy of anti-amyloid therapies in Asia. The proposed framework aims to ensure safe and effective use of anti-amyloid therapies while mitigating ARIA-related risks, thereby optimizing therapeutic outcomes for early AD in diverse healthcare settings across Asia.

Background: Safety profiles of lecanemab, an anti-amyloid-β antibody for the treatment of early Alzheimer's disease (AD), remain uncertain and may vary between randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence (RWE) studies.

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and acceptability of lecanemab based on findings from both RCTs and emerging RWE studies.

Methods: We systematically searched major databases and clinical trial registries from their inception to June 2025. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate the pooled incidence of key safety outcomes, including amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), infusion-related reactions (IRRs), and treatment discontinuation (due to ARIA, adverse events [AEs], or any cause). The risk of ARIA according to the ApoE4 genotype was assessed via relative risk (RR). This study was registered with PROSPERO (No. CRD420251110679).

Results: A total of two RCTs and five RWE studies encompassing 1576 patients were included. The pooled ARIA incidence was 19% (95% CI: 16%-23%), which was significantly modulated by ApoE4 status (RR 1.45 for heterozygotes, 3.54 for homozygotes vs noncarriers) and the pooled symptomatic ARIA incidence was 3% (95% CI: 2%-4%). IRRs occurred in 26% (95% CI: 19%-34%), with heterogeneity reduced in patients receiving specific pre-infusion prophylaxis. The pooled rate of discontinuation due to AEs was 8% (95% CI: 5%-11%), with discontinuation due to ARIA occurring in 5% (95% CI: 3%-7%) of patients in RWE studies.

Conclusions: Lecanemab-related ARIA demonstrates a clear ApoE4 gene-dose effect, supporting routine ApoE4 genotyping before treatment. Standardizing pre-infusion prophylaxis may reduce variability in IRRs incidence, while prompt recognition and management of ARIA are critical for improving treatment tolerability. These findings provide important evidence to support the safe clinical use of lecanemab.

Alzheimer's Disease is a complex, chronic illness of increasing prevalence in the US and worldwide. The complexity of this illness, and its impact on caregivers make it an ideal candidate for navigation services. The development of billable navigation codes now make it possible to create a financially sustainable navigation program. We describe our initial experience with a brain health navigator program, partnering between primary and specialty memory care, in a large integrated healthcare system. While a number of challenges exist, and careful planning was required, we have successfully implemented a navigation program, enrolling greater than 100 patients in the initial 6 months. Patient and caregiver feedback has been highly positive. We have experienced no significant barriers to reimbursement and when accounting for incremental downstream revenue generation (e.g. MRI, labs), we are forecasting long-term financial sustainability and the opportunity for continued scaling over time.