The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease最新文献

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Background

Clinical trial satisfaction is increasingly important for future trial designs and is associated with treatment adherence and willingness to enroll in future research studies or to recommend trial participation. In this post-trial survey, we examined participant satisfaction and attitudes toward future clinical trials in the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trials Unit (DIAN-TU).

Methods

We developed an anonymous, participant satisfaction survey tailored to participants enrolled in the DIAN-TU-001 double-blind clinical trial of solanezumab or gantenerumab and requested that all study sites share the survey with their trial participants. A total of 194 participants enrolled in the trial at 24 study sites. We utilized regression analysis to explore the link between participants’ clinical trial experiences, their satisfaction, and their willingness to participate in upcoming trials.

Results

Survey responses were received over a sixteen-month window during 2020–2021 from 58 participants representing 15 study sites. Notably, 96.5% of the survey respondents expressed high levels of satisfaction with the trial, 91.4% would recommend trial participation, and 96.5% were willing to enroll again. Age, gender, and education did not influence satisfaction levels. Participants reported enhanced medical care (70.7%) and pride in contributing to the DIAN-TU trial (84.5%). Satisfaction with personnel and procedures was high (98.3%). Respondents had a mean age of 48.7 years, with most being from North America and Western Europe, matching the trial’s demographic distribution. Participants’ decisions to learn their genetic status increased during the trial, and most participants endorsed considering future trial participation regardless of the DIAN-TU-001 trial outcome.

Conclusion

Results suggest that DIAN-TU-001 participants who responded to the survey exhibited high motivation to participate in research, overall satisfaction with the clinical trial, and willingness to participate in research in the future, despite a long trial duration of 4–7 years with detailed annual clinical, cognitive, PET, MRI, and lumbar puncture assessments. Implementation of features that alleviate barriers and challenges to trial participation is like to have a high impact on trial satisfaction and reduce participant burden.

Background

A history of fracture has been associated with increased risk of dementia; however, it is uncertain whether sex difference exists in the association between prior fracture and subsequent risk of incident dementia.

Objectives

To investigate whether sex modified the relationship between prior fracture and subsequent risk of dementia.

Design

Prospective cohort study.

Setting

UK Biobank.

Participants

496,331 participants (54.6% women) free of dementia at baseline.

Measurements

History of fracture was self-reported via touchscreen questionnaires at baseline. The primary outcome was all-cause dementia.

Results

Both any fracture and fragility fracture were significantly associated with an increased risk of subsequent all-cause dementia in men (adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.28; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14–1.43; adjusted HR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.18–1.87, respectively), but not in women (adjusted HR: 1.04; 95% CI 0.95–1.15; adjusted HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.87–1.18, respectively); and these sex-differences were significant (P interaction = 0.006; P interaction = 0.007, respectively). The sex differences in the impacts of different fracture sites (including upper limb, lower limb, spine, and multiple sites) were consistent on all-cause dementia.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that prior fracture was associated with an increased risk of dementia in men but not in women, and the sex difference was significant. Previous fracture may be an important marker for identifying subsequent dementia in middle-aged and older men.

Assessment of meaningfulness in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is challenging, particularly in early disease. Converting clinical outcomes to disease progression time allows assessment of treatment effects using a metric that is understandable and meaningful: time. We demonstrate time savings assessments using meta time component tests (TCTs) in the LipiDiDiet multinutrient RCT. Dietary patterns are important for dementia prevention, likely due to individual cumulative nutrient effects. LipiDiDiet used a multinutrient (Fortasyn Connect) formulation in patients with prodromal AD, benefitting cognition (5-item composite NTB, effect 0.089), cognition and function (CDR-SB, −0.605), and slowing hippocampal atrophy (0.122 cm³). Meaningfulness of point differences is unclear. However, a combination TCT showed 9-month disease time savings at 24 months (38% slowing of disease time): 9.0, 10.5, and 7.2 months for NTB, CDR-SB, and hippocampal volume, underscoring the value of TCTs in AD RCTs and the need for continued validation of this approach.

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to examine whether higher comorbidity burden, as assessed by comorbidity indices, was associated with a functional autonomy decline in individuals with cognitive impairment. The search was conducted in the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, and Embase. Both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies that examined the relationship between comorbidity indices and scales measuring activities of daily living (ADL) in individuals with cognitive impairment were included. The quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) was used. Overall, 12 studies were included, among which three were longitudinal. Significant association was frequently reported by cross-sectional designs (n=7 studies) and only one study reported a significant longitudinal association. This longitudinal study repeatedly assessed both comorbidity burden and functional autonomy, and considered comorbidity burden as a time-varying covariate. Considering comorbidity burden as a time varying covariate may deal with the dynamic nature of comorbidity burden over time, and conducting repeated assessments during the follow-up using both comorbidity index and ADL scales may increase their sensitivity to reliably measure comorbidity burden and functional autonomy decline over time. In conclusion, a higher comorbidity index was associated with a lower level of functional autonomy in people with cognitive impairment. This relationship seems to be dynamic over time and using comorbidity indices and ADL scales only once may not deal with the fluctuation of both comorbidity burden and functional autonomy decline. To cope with complexity of this relationship this review highlights some methodological approaches to be considered.

Abstract

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease and there is by far no effective treatment for it, especially in its late stage. Circular RNAs (circRNAs), known as a class of non-coding RNAs are widely observed in eukaryotic transcriptomes, and are reported to play an important role in neurodegenerative diseases including AD. circRNAs usually act as microRNA (miRNA) inhibitors or «sponges» to regulate the function of miRNAs, leading to subsequent changes in protein activities and functions. Accumulating evidence indicates that circRNAs can serve as potential biomarker in AD early prediction. The functional roles of circRNAs are very versatile including miRNAs binding - thus affecting downstream gene expression, generating abnormally translated protein peptides, and affecting epigenetic modifications which subsequently affect AD related gene expressions. Therefore, identifying AD-related circRNAs can contribute to AD early diagnosis and intervention. In this work, we collected and curated an AD-related circRNA dataset; by exploring the circRNAs’ corresponding DNA loci distribution in chromatin 3D conformation (3D genome) and utilize the such 3D genome information, we were able to selected a concise yet predictively effective circRNA panel, based on which, significantly better AD prediction machine learning models were achieved.

Background

Growing evidence supports the clinical utility of amyloid PET, however, whether patients at risk for dementia use knowledge of their brain amyloid status to alter their health behaviors remains unclear.

Objectives

To explore the effect of amyloid PET results disclosure on self-reported health behaviors in patients with mild cognitive impairment.

Design

Self-reported health behaviors were a secondary outcome of the Return of Amyloid Imaging Scan Results (RAISR) randomized clinical trial of amyloid PET results disclosure for individuals with mild cognitive impairment.

Setting

Academic medical center.

Participants

RAISR study participants included 82 patients with mild cognitive impairment who were 92% non-Hispanic white, 59% male, and, on average, 73 ± 8.61 years old with 16.25 ± 2.49 years of education.

Intervention

Participants were assigned to a scan group with the opportunity to have an amyloid PET scan and learn their results or to a control group consisting only of a mild cognitive impairment education session and no opportunity for an amyloid PET scan.

Measurements

A 14-item health behavior questionnaire supplemented with qualitative data from the open-ended text entries to describe “other” health behaviors and follow-up semi-structured interviews. Baseline assessments were conducted prior to group assignment. For the present analysis, 71 participants had available data and scan group participants were divided by amyloid status, creating three groups for comparison: amyloid positive, amyloid negative, and control (no scan).

Results

Over 12 months of follow-up, no significant differences were observed in lifestyle, vitamin/supplement use, stress reduction activities, cognitive stimulation, or advance directive completion. Amyloid-negative participants were less likely than controls to consider long-term care insurance (63.6% vs. 89.2%; P =.025), and to endorse behaviors classified as “other” (36.4% vs. 64.9%; P = 0.037). After adjusting for education level, gender, and Mini-Mental State Exam score, logistic regression showed that amyloid-negative patients were 74% less likely than controls to report “other” behaviors (OR = 0.26, 95% CI [0.08, 0.85], P = 0.025), and 78% less likely to consider long-term care insurance (OR= 0.22, 95% CI [0.06, 0.86], P = 0.03). Qualitative analysis of open-ended questionnaire data and supplemental interviews with scan group participants revealed “other” activities to include changes in areas like employment, driving, and residential status, and engagement in other non-medical activities (e.g., pursuing bucket lists).