Pub Date : 2022-09-19DOI: 10.1108/ijaim-05-2022-0112
M. Usman, Jacinta C. Nwachukwu, Ernest Ezeani
Purpose This paper aims to examine the impact of board characteristics on earnings management (EM) among UK non-financial firms. Design/methodology/approach Using a sample of the UK Financial Times Stock Exchange 350 firms from 2010 till 2019, the authors investigated the relationship between board characteristics (board size, board gender diversity, board tenure, board independence, chief executive office-duality and board meetings) and EM by using the quantile regression technique. Findings This study found a non-linear association between board characteristics and discretionary accrual. The empirical evidence showed that board mechanisms reduce the extent of earnings manipulation among UK firms with higher discretionary accruals (DACC) than firms with low and medium DACC levels. Research limitations/implications The results will benefit UK firms by helping them to rethink their board composition. It will also help policymakers understand how the corporate board can help ensure the quality of financial reports. Originality/value This study used the quantile regression approach, which helps to clarify the mixed findings of prior studies that used conventional regression techniques.
{"title":"The impact of board characteristics on the extent of earnings management: conditional evidence from quantile regressions","authors":"M. Usman, Jacinta C. Nwachukwu, Ernest Ezeani","doi":"10.1108/ijaim-05-2022-0112","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-05-2022-0112","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000This paper aims to examine the impact of board characteristics on earnings management (EM) among UK non-financial firms.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000Using a sample of the UK Financial Times Stock Exchange 350 firms from 2010 till 2019, the authors investigated the relationship between board characteristics (board size, board gender diversity, board tenure, board independence, chief executive office-duality and board meetings) and EM by using the quantile regression technique.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000This study found a non-linear association between board characteristics and discretionary accrual. The empirical evidence showed that board mechanisms reduce the extent of earnings manipulation among UK firms with higher discretionary accruals (DACC) than firms with low and medium DACC levels.\u0000\u0000\u0000Research limitations/implications\u0000The results will benefit UK firms by helping them to rethink their board composition. It will also help policymakers understand how the corporate board can help ensure the quality of financial reports.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000This study used the quantile regression approach, which helps to clarify the mixed findings of prior studies that used conventional regression techniques.\u0000","PeriodicalId":229587,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123121239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-15DOI: 10.1108/ijaim-04-2022-0086
Ali Uyar, Hany Elbardan, C. Kuzey, Abdullah S. Karaman
Purpose This study aims mainly to test the effect of audit committee independence and expertise attributes on corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting, assurance and global reporting initiative (GRI) framework adoption and to investigate how CSR committee existence moderates this main relationship. Design/methodology/approach The study uses a large global sample that includes all (59,172) firm-year observations having CSR-related data in the Thomson Reuters Eikon database for a period between 2002 and 2019. The empirical analyses are based on random-effects logistic panel regression and Hayes methodology for the moderation analysis. Findings The study finds that audit committee independence and expertise are significantly associated with CSR reporting, CSR report assurance and GRI framework adoption. Moderation analysis largely supports the existence of a substitution role between audit and CSR committees and implies that audit committees are significant predictors of CSR reporting, assurance and GRI framework adoption mostly in the absence of the CSR committee. Practical implications The findings propose audit committee members be extra-vigilant in CSR reporting and assurance practices arising from undertaking substitution roles with the CSR committee. Hence, firms may configure their corporate structure in line with the results such as augmenting the audit committee with independent and expert members if they do not constitute a CSR committee. If firms establish a CSR committee, audit committee members may allocate less time to CSR reporting and assurance and more time to financial reporting quality. Originality/value This is the first study, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, to investigate the direct and indirect effect of audit committees’ attributes not only on CSR disclosure but also on GRI implementation and CSR reporting external assurance, considering the CSR committee’s possible substitutability or complementarity moderating role. This research develops a deeper understanding of audit committees’ non-financial role.
{"title":"Audit and CSR committees: are they complements or substitutes in CSR reporting, assurance and GRI framework adoption?","authors":"Ali Uyar, Hany Elbardan, C. Kuzey, Abdullah S. Karaman","doi":"10.1108/ijaim-04-2022-0086","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-04-2022-0086","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000This study aims mainly to test the effect of audit committee independence and expertise attributes on corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting, assurance and global reporting initiative (GRI) framework adoption and to investigate how CSR committee existence moderates this main relationship.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000The study uses a large global sample that includes all (59,172) firm-year observations having CSR-related data in the Thomson Reuters Eikon database for a period between 2002 and 2019. The empirical analyses are based on random-effects logistic panel regression and Hayes methodology for the moderation analysis.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000The study finds that audit committee independence and expertise are significantly associated with CSR reporting, CSR report assurance and GRI framework adoption. Moderation analysis largely supports the existence of a substitution role between audit and CSR committees and implies that audit committees are significant predictors of CSR reporting, assurance and GRI framework adoption mostly in the absence of the CSR committee.\u0000\u0000\u0000Practical implications\u0000The findings propose audit committee members be extra-vigilant in CSR reporting and assurance practices arising from undertaking substitution roles with the CSR committee. Hence, firms may configure their corporate structure in line with the results such as augmenting the audit committee with independent and expert members if they do not constitute a CSR committee. If firms establish a CSR committee, audit committee members may allocate less time to CSR reporting and assurance and more time to financial reporting quality.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000This is the first study, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, to investigate the direct and indirect effect of audit committees’ attributes not only on CSR disclosure but also on GRI implementation and CSR reporting external assurance, considering the CSR committee’s possible substitutability or complementarity moderating role. This research develops a deeper understanding of audit committees’ non-financial role.\u0000","PeriodicalId":229587,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124125343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-08-29DOI: 10.1108/ijaim-03-2022-0047
Fabio La Rosa, Francesca Bernini
Purpose This paper aims to investigate the effect of environmental, social and governance (ESG) controversies on the cost of equity (COE) capital, exploring the moderating role of both positive ESG performance and market securities regulation. Design/methodology/approach This paper adopts a sample of 2,599 time observations related to European listed companies for which the authors examine a set of 30 negative ESG scores across the three pillars in terms of controversies, compliance and other negative issues. This study uses the average of seven implied COE estimates. Findings The results show that negative ESG performance, particularly environmental controversies, increases the COE, although this impact is mitigated when associated with company efforts to improve environmental performance. Besides, environmental controversies are likely to increase the COE in countries where the market regulation is stronger, as a consequence of higher investors’ expectations towards the scrutiny role of more efficient markets against companies’ controversies. Practical implications Companies should take care seriously of environmental issues such as biodiversity, product impact and resource impact, because investors do react accordingly. As despite no direct effects of positive ESG performance are observed in terms of COE reduction, the mitigating role on the ESG controversies–COE relationship makes ESG practices still significant for European investors. Social implications The effects of ESG performance on company financial performance should be investigated under the assumption that bad events weight more than positive ESG performance. Originality/value Because no prior studies have specifically assessed the effect of the European listed companies’ ESG controversies on their COE, this paper delivers insights into the relationship between positive and negative ESG performance and their effects on capital market financing.
{"title":"ESG controversies and the cost of equity capital of European listed companies: the moderating effects of ESG performance and market securities regulation","authors":"Fabio La Rosa, Francesca Bernini","doi":"10.1108/ijaim-03-2022-0047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-03-2022-0047","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000This paper aims to investigate the effect of environmental, social and governance (ESG) controversies on the cost of equity (COE) capital, exploring the moderating role of both positive ESG performance and market securities regulation.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000This paper adopts a sample of 2,599 time observations related to European listed companies for which the authors examine a set of 30 negative ESG scores across the three pillars in terms of controversies, compliance and other negative issues. This study uses the average of seven implied COE estimates.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000The results show that negative ESG performance, particularly environmental controversies, increases the COE, although this impact is mitigated when associated with company efforts to improve environmental performance. Besides, environmental controversies are likely to increase the COE in countries where the market regulation is stronger, as a consequence of higher investors’ expectations towards the scrutiny role of more efficient markets against companies’ controversies.\u0000\u0000\u0000Practical implications\u0000Companies should take care seriously of environmental issues such as biodiversity, product impact and resource impact, because investors do react accordingly. As despite no direct effects of positive ESG performance are observed in terms of COE reduction, the mitigating role on the ESG controversies–COE relationship makes ESG practices still significant for European investors.\u0000\u0000\u0000Social implications\u0000The effects of ESG performance on company financial performance should be investigated under the assumption that bad events weight more than positive ESG performance.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000Because no prior studies have specifically assessed the effect of the European listed companies’ ESG controversies on their COE, this paper delivers insights into the relationship between positive and negative ESG performance and their effects on capital market financing.\u0000","PeriodicalId":229587,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129042832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-08-23DOI: 10.1108/ijaim-12-2021-0259
Jaime Fernandes Teixeira, L. L. Rodrigues
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a bibliometric analysis of earnings management (EM), providing an overview of the main results and research trends in this area. EM is a relevant topic in financial studies. It has been widely studied over the past few decades as a phenomenon of intentional manipulation of financial reporting. Design/methodology/approach The Web of Science (WoS) database was used as a source, and this study has adopted VOSviewer as the bibliometric analysis tool to achieve an overview of EM research and understand current research trends on this matter. This study has collected data from 4,342 articles published from 1900 to 2020. Findings The conclusions of this study show that EM is strongly related to corporate governance, performance and quality of information. Publication trends and categories are useful to understand the development of trends and current domains in this area. This research analyses the most productive authors, countries and journals. This study conducted a cluster analysis using a keyword perspective to obtain emerging trends in EM. Research in EM through real activities represents a research gap, which can be an opportunity for future research. Research limitations/implications The authors recognize as limitations the fact that the study is limited to the WoS database. Another limitation is the keywords used for the search, as this study only uses “earnings management”, as it is the most used keyword in EM literature. An additional limitation is associated with the selection of only one type of document, “articles,” disregarding other types of publications. Originality/value Although there are some bibliometric studies on EM, this study found out that they focus on specific EM topics and fail to analyze this theme on a global scale. Most of the literature on this subject is disperse and consequently needs systematization. This research is also relevant for academic purpose, as this research contributes to understanding the state of art and contributes to the development of scientific knowledge by providing a systematization of the literature on the topic of EM.
本文的目的是对盈余管理(EM)进行文献计量分析，概述该领域的主要成果和研究趋势。新兴市场是金融研究中的一个相关课题。在过去的几十年里，它作为一种故意操纵财务报告的现象被广泛研究。设计/方法/方法本研究以Web of Science (WoS)数据库为数据来源，采用VOSviewer作为文献计量分析工具，对EM研究进行概述，并了解该问题的当前研究趋势。这项研究收集了从1900年到2020年发表的4342篇文章的数据。本研究的结论表明，新兴市场与公司治理、绩效和信息质量密切相关。出版物趋势和类别有助于了解该领域的趋势和当前领域的发展。这项研究分析了最高产的作者、国家和期刊。本研究采用关键字视角进行聚类分析，以获得EM的新兴趋势。通过实际活动对EM的研究代表了研究空白，这可能是未来研究的机会。研究的局限性/启示作者认识到研究局限于WoS数据库这一事实的局限性。另一个限制是用于搜索的关键词，因为本研究只使用了“盈余管理”，因为它是新兴市场文献中使用最多的关键词。另一个限制是只选择一种类型的文档“文章”，而忽略其他类型的出版物。原创性/价值虽然有一些关于新兴市场的文献计量学研究，但本研究发现它们关注的是特定的新兴市场主题，未能在全球范围内分析这一主题。关于这一主题的大多数文献是分散的，因此需要系统化。本研究也与学术目的相关，因为本研究通过提供EM主题的文献系统化，有助于了解艺术状态并有助于科学知识的发展。
{"title":"Earnings management: a bibliometric analysis","authors":"Jaime Fernandes Teixeira, L. L. Rodrigues","doi":"10.1108/ijaim-12-2021-0259","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-12-2021-0259","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000The purpose of this paper is to present a bibliometric analysis of earnings management (EM), providing an overview of the main results and research trends in this area. EM is a relevant topic in financial studies. It has been widely studied over the past few decades as a phenomenon of intentional manipulation of financial reporting.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000The Web of Science (WoS) database was used as a source, and this study has adopted VOSviewer as the bibliometric analysis tool to achieve an overview of EM research and understand current research trends on this matter. This study has collected data from 4,342 articles published from 1900 to 2020.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000The conclusions of this study show that EM is strongly related to corporate governance, performance and quality of information. Publication trends and categories are useful to understand the development of trends and current domains in this area. This research analyses the most productive authors, countries and journals. This study conducted a cluster analysis using a keyword perspective to obtain emerging trends in EM. Research in EM through real activities represents a research gap, which can be an opportunity for future research.\u0000\u0000\u0000Research limitations/implications\u0000The authors recognize as limitations the fact that the study is limited to the WoS database. Another limitation is the keywords used for the search, as this study only uses “earnings management”, as it is the most used keyword in EM literature. An additional limitation is associated with the selection of only one type of document, “articles,” disregarding other types of publications.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000Although there are some bibliometric studies on EM, this study found out that they focus on specific EM topics and fail to analyze this theme on a global scale. Most of the literature on this subject is disperse and consequently needs systematization. This research is also relevant for academic purpose, as this research contributes to understanding the state of art and contributes to the development of scientific knowledge by providing a systematization of the literature on the topic of EM.\u0000","PeriodicalId":229587,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114714594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-08-02DOI: 10.1108/ijaim-05-2022-0094
Lara Alhaddad, A. Gerged, Z. Saidat, Anas Ali Al-Qudah, T. Aziz
Purpose This study aims to examine the potential influence of multiple directorships (MDs) on the firm value of listed firms in Jordan. Design/methodology/approach Using a sample of 1,067 firm-year observations of Jordanian listed companies from 2010 to 2020, this study applies a pooled ordinary least squares regression model to examine the above-stated relationship. This technique was supported by conducting a generalized method of moments estimation to address the possible occurrence of endogeneity concerns. Findings The results show a significant negative relationship between MDs and firm performance, thereby supporting the “Busyness Hypothesis”, which suggests that directors with MDs are expected to be over-committed, too busy and less vigilant. Thus, their ability to effectively monitor the company management on behalf of the shareholders is quite limited. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study in Jordan, and one of the very rare studies in the Middle Eastern and North African region, to examine the relationship between MDs and firm performance. This study provides important policy and practitioner implications in the field of corporate governance by highlighting the necessity of imposing stricter limits on the number of directorships allowed for board directors. Crucially, the empirical evidence implies that limited directorships ensure that directors are able to fulfil their board responsibilities appropriately, which is significantly associated with the firm value.
{"title":"Do multiple directorships stimulate or inhibit firm value? Evidence from an emerging economy","authors":"Lara Alhaddad, A. Gerged, Z. Saidat, Anas Ali Al-Qudah, T. Aziz","doi":"10.1108/ijaim-05-2022-0094","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-05-2022-0094","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000This study aims to examine the potential influence of multiple directorships (MDs) on the firm value of listed firms in Jordan.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000Using a sample of 1,067 firm-year observations of Jordanian listed companies from 2010 to 2020, this study applies a pooled ordinary least squares regression model to examine the above-stated relationship. This technique was supported by conducting a generalized method of moments estimation to address the possible occurrence of endogeneity concerns.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000The results show a significant negative relationship between MDs and firm performance, thereby supporting the “Busyness Hypothesis”, which suggests that directors with MDs are expected to be over-committed, too busy and less vigilant. Thus, their ability to effectively monitor the company management on behalf of the shareholders is quite limited.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study in Jordan, and one of the very rare studies in the Middle Eastern and North African region, to examine the relationship between MDs and firm performance. This study provides important policy and practitioner implications in the field of corporate governance by highlighting the necessity of imposing stricter limits on the number of directorships allowed for board directors. Crucially, the empirical evidence implies that limited directorships ensure that directors are able to fulfil their board responsibilities appropriately, which is significantly associated with the firm value.\u0000","PeriodicalId":229587,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122505018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-15DOI: 10.1108/ijaim-02-2022-0030
M. Harjoto, I. Laksmana
Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of the 2020 COVID-19 lockdown on the audit fees and audit delay of audit client firms located in 52 countries and audit firm offices located in 40 countries. Design/methodology/approach Using archival audit data from Audit Analytics in the fiscal year 2020, this study examines the impact of the length of COVID-19 lockdown and other public health restrictions, measured by the stringency index (Hale et al., 2021), on audit fees and audit delay using a multivariate regression analysis. Findings Based on a sample of 2,726 US firms and 718 non-US firms from 51 different countries outside the USA and audit firm offices in 40 countries during the fiscal year 2020, the authors find that the COVID-19 lockdown and public health restrictions increase audit fees and audit delay. However, non-US firms experience longer audit delay because of the lockdown than their US counterparts. In addition, longer lockdown and greater restrictions increase the audit fees and audit delay of non-US firms with high audit risk at a greater rate than those of US firms with high audit risk. Practical implications The results of this study suggest that auditors increase audit fees and have longer audit delay when facing more COVID-19 restrictions. Increased audit fees and audit delay are likely to result from higher perceived audit risk and, consequently, additional audit effort to design new procedures, train staff to use the new procedures and implement them amid the pandemic restrictions. The impact of COVID lockdown and restrictions on audit fees and audit delay are more pronounced for non-US firms with greater audit risk. The results of this study suggest that audit firms should quickly adapt to the evolving audit, risk and financial landscape created by the pandemic. Originality/value Using archival audit data and large sample size, this study provides the first empirical evidence of the impact of lockdown and public health restrictions during the first wave of COVID-19 outbreak on audit processes as measured with audit fees and audit delay.
{"title":"The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on audit fees and audit delay: international evidence","authors":"M. Harjoto, I. Laksmana","doi":"10.1108/ijaim-02-2022-0030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-02-2022-0030","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of the 2020 COVID-19 lockdown on the audit fees and audit delay of audit client firms located in 52 countries and audit firm offices located in 40 countries.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000Using archival audit data from Audit Analytics in the fiscal year 2020, this study examines the impact of the length of COVID-19 lockdown and other public health restrictions, measured by the stringency index (Hale et al., 2021), on audit fees and audit delay using a multivariate regression analysis.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000Based on a sample of 2,726 US firms and 718 non-US firms from 51 different countries outside the USA and audit firm offices in 40 countries during the fiscal year 2020, the authors find that the COVID-19 lockdown and public health restrictions increase audit fees and audit delay. However, non-US firms experience longer audit delay because of the lockdown than their US counterparts. In addition, longer lockdown and greater restrictions increase the audit fees and audit delay of non-US firms with high audit risk at a greater rate than those of US firms with high audit risk.\u0000\u0000\u0000Practical implications\u0000The results of this study suggest that auditors increase audit fees and have longer audit delay when facing more COVID-19 restrictions. Increased audit fees and audit delay are likely to result from higher perceived audit risk and, consequently, additional audit effort to design new procedures, train staff to use the new procedures and implement them amid the pandemic restrictions. The impact of COVID lockdown and restrictions on audit fees and audit delay are more pronounced for non-US firms with greater audit risk. The results of this study suggest that audit firms should quickly adapt to the evolving audit, risk and financial landscape created by the pandemic.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000Using archival audit data and large sample size, this study provides the first empirical evidence of the impact of lockdown and public health restrictions during the first wave of COVID-19 outbreak on audit processes as measured with audit fees and audit delay.\u0000","PeriodicalId":229587,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117070878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose Using textual analysis, this paper aims to measure diversity management disclosure; it also explore the relationship between corporate governance and diversity management disclosure. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on a sample of the UK FTSE all-share non-financial organisations over the period from 2013 to 2019. We used a computer-aided textual analysis, and we used a bag of words to score the sample annual reports. Findings The results show that the mean of the diversity management disclosure level is very low. Also, there is a positive relationship between the board size, women on board and board independence and the level of diversity management disclosure. The relationship is higher with more board members, women on board and more independent directors, aligning with previous literature. Practical implications The implications of this research affect stakeholders and organisations which reflects the importance of communicating diversity practices and researchers by facilitating measuring objectively firms’ diversity management practices that have not been applied previously in the field of diversity. Originality/value With different incidents taking place around the globe, such as the incident of George Floyd and the increased attention to diversity, organisations are under increasing social and political pressure to reflect on their diversity management practices. Previous literature has examined firms’ diversity practises from different perspectives, but to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper to measure diversity management disclosure.
{"title":"Corporate governance and diversity management: evidence from a disclosure perspective","authors":"Doaa Shohaieb, Mahmoud Elmarzouky, Khaldoon Albitar","doi":"10.1108/ijaim-03-2022-0058","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-03-2022-0058","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000Using textual analysis, this paper aims to measure diversity management disclosure; it also explore the relationship between corporate governance and diversity management disclosure.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000The study is based on a sample of the UK FTSE all-share non-financial organisations over the period from 2013 to 2019. We used a computer-aided textual analysis, and we used a bag of words to score the sample annual reports.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000The results show that the mean of the diversity management disclosure level is very low. Also, there is a positive relationship between the board size, women on board and board independence and the level of diversity management disclosure. The relationship is higher with more board members, women on board and more independent directors, aligning with previous literature.\u0000\u0000\u0000Practical implications\u0000The implications of this research affect stakeholders and organisations which reflects the importance of communicating diversity practices and researchers by facilitating measuring objectively firms’ diversity management practices that have not been applied previously in the field of diversity.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000With different incidents taking place around the globe, such as the incident of George Floyd and the increased attention to diversity, organisations are under increasing social and political pressure to reflect on their diversity management practices. Previous literature has examined firms’ diversity practises from different perspectives, but to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first paper to measure diversity management disclosure.\u0000","PeriodicalId":229587,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134371391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-10DOI: 10.1108/ijaim-02-2022-0024
K. Hussainey, Khaldoon Albitar, Fadi Alkaraan
Purpose This paper aims to provide early evidence on corporate transformation towards Industry 4.0 (CTTI4) in the UK, particularly by examining the effect of corporate governance on the narrative reporting of CTTI4. Design/methodology/approach The authors analyse all UK financial times stock exchange all-share non-financial firms that have published their annual reports for the period of 2013–2018. The authors use computerised textual analysis to measure the level of corporate reporting on Industry 4.0 (I4.0) for 1,001 firm-year observations. The authors used different regression models to test the research hypotheses. Findings The findings contribute to the growing literature on business model transformation in UK companies towards the I4.0 strategy. The findings show that the level of reporting on CTTI4 is improving over the sample period and varies between industries. The authors also find that better governance quality enhances the level of reporting on CTTI4. Practical implications The findings of this study inform decision makers and regulators about factors driving UK companies to report information about their actionable strategies to direct I4.0 endeavours. Originality/value The paper makes an important and novel contribution to corporate disclosure literature. So far as the authors know, it is the only paper to examine the impact of corporate governance on corporate narrative reporting on I4.0 technologies. Moreover, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, it is the first paper to show that the quality of corporate governance adds value to this strategic type of corporate disclosure.
{"title":"Corporate narrative reporting on Industry 4.0 technologies: does governance matter?","authors":"K. Hussainey, Khaldoon Albitar, Fadi Alkaraan","doi":"10.1108/ijaim-02-2022-0024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-02-2022-0024","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000This paper aims to provide early evidence on corporate transformation towards Industry 4.0 (CTTI4) in the UK, particularly by examining the effect of corporate governance on the narrative reporting of CTTI4.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000The authors analyse all UK financial times stock exchange all-share non-financial firms that have published their annual reports for the period of 2013–2018. The authors use computerised textual analysis to measure the level of corporate reporting on Industry 4.0 (I4.0) for 1,001 firm-year observations. The authors used different regression models to test the research hypotheses.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000The findings contribute to the growing literature on business model transformation in UK companies towards the I4.0 strategy. The findings show that the level of reporting on CTTI4 is improving over the sample period and varies between industries. The authors also find that better governance quality enhances the level of reporting on CTTI4.\u0000\u0000\u0000Practical implications\u0000The findings of this study inform decision makers and regulators about factors driving UK companies to report information about their actionable strategies to direct I4.0 endeavours.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000The paper makes an important and novel contribution to corporate disclosure literature. So far as the authors know, it is the only paper to examine the impact of corporate governance on corporate narrative reporting on I4.0 technologies. Moreover, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, it is the first paper to show that the quality of corporate governance adds value to this strategic type of corporate disclosure.\u0000","PeriodicalId":229587,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128417273","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-03DOI: 10.1108/ijaim-12-2021-0248
Husam Ananzeh, Hamzeh Al Amosh, Khaldoon Albitar
Purpose This paper aims to investigate whether and how better corporate governance practices can lead to philanthropic behavior among companies in the UK. In particular, this study attempts to determine whether corporate governance quality in general, as well as its specific mechanisms, affects corporate giving. Design/methodology/approach The analysis is based on a sample of Financial Times Stock Exchange All-Share nonfinancial companies. Data on firm donations, including donations amount and donations intensity, were manually collected from companies’ annual reports for the period 2018–2020. This paper uses panel data models to examine the research hypotheses. Findings The results of this study indicate that both donations amount and donations intensity are positively associated with the practice of better corporate governance. Board independence is positively associated with donations amount, but not with the intensity of donations. Furthermore, board size, board gender diversity and the establishment of a corporate social responsibility (CSR) committee are likely to have a positive impact on the amount and the intensity of firms’ donations. However, neither the chief executive officer board membership nor the audit committee’s independence is related to the firm’s donations. Practical implications This study sheds light on specific governance factors that affect firm donations in the context of UK companies. This allows regulators and legislators to evaluate the donations activities in the country and issue more directives to reinforce corporate governance practices that support corporate donations. In addition, the findings of this study are considered crucial to investors who prefer investing in companies with significant CSR-related activities to improve the value relevance of their investments. Originality/value This study provides a shred of unique evidence on the impact of corporate governance practices on firms’ donations.
{"title":"The effect of corporate governance quality and its mechanisms on firm philanthropic donations: evidence from the UK","authors":"Husam Ananzeh, Hamzeh Al Amosh, Khaldoon Albitar","doi":"10.1108/ijaim-12-2021-0248","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-12-2021-0248","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000This paper aims to investigate whether and how better corporate governance practices can lead to philanthropic behavior among companies in the UK. In particular, this study attempts to determine whether corporate governance quality in general, as well as its specific mechanisms, affects corporate giving.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000The analysis is based on a sample of Financial Times Stock Exchange All-Share nonfinancial companies. Data on firm donations, including donations amount and donations intensity, were manually collected from companies’ annual reports for the period 2018–2020. This paper uses panel data models to examine the research hypotheses.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000The results of this study indicate that both donations amount and donations intensity are positively associated with the practice of better corporate governance. Board independence is positively associated with donations amount, but not with the intensity of donations. Furthermore, board size, board gender diversity and the establishment of a corporate social responsibility (CSR) committee are likely to have a positive impact on the amount and the intensity of firms’ donations. However, neither the chief executive officer board membership nor the audit committee’s independence is related to the firm’s donations.\u0000\u0000\u0000Practical implications\u0000This study sheds light on specific governance factors that affect firm donations in the context of UK companies. This allows regulators and legislators to evaluate the donations activities in the country and issue more directives to reinforce corporate governance practices that support corporate donations. In addition, the findings of this study are considered crucial to investors who prefer investing in companies with significant CSR-related activities to improve the value relevance of their investments.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000This study provides a shred of unique evidence on the impact of corporate governance practices on firms’ donations.\u0000","PeriodicalId":229587,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122579631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-04-25DOI: 10.1108/ijaim-07-2021-0154
Md. Borhan Uddin Bhuiyan, Fawad Ahmad
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of financial restatement on corporate dividend payment. Firms that announce financial restatements rupture their corporate reputation and adversely affect investors’ confidence. Consequently, firms must attempt to regain lost reputation and market confidence. Design/methodology/approach This study uses the US regulatory setting to examine the association between corporate dividend policy and financial restatement over the 2001–2017 financial years. Findings The findings evidence a robust positive association between financial restatement and dividend payouts, indicating that firms pay higher dividends following the year of financial restatement. Several sensitivity tests were conducted to confirm the robustness of the findings. Originality/value Prior research indicates that corporate dividend payouts enhance a firm’s reputation by reducing information asymmetry and providing a positive signal to investors regarding future financial performance. This study provides valuable evidence that dividend payout can be used as a channel for image restoration by firms with lost reputations because of financial restatement.
{"title":"Dividend payment and financial restatement: US evidence","authors":"Md. Borhan Uddin Bhuiyan, Fawad Ahmad","doi":"10.1108/ijaim-07-2021-0154","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-07-2021-0154","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Purpose\u0000The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of financial restatement on corporate dividend payment. Firms that announce financial restatements rupture their corporate reputation and adversely affect investors’ confidence. Consequently, firms must attempt to regain lost reputation and market confidence.\u0000\u0000\u0000Design/methodology/approach\u0000This study uses the US regulatory setting to examine the association between corporate dividend policy and financial restatement over the 2001–2017 financial years.\u0000\u0000\u0000Findings\u0000The findings evidence a robust positive association between financial restatement and dividend payouts, indicating that firms pay higher dividends following the year of financial restatement. Several sensitivity tests were conducted to confirm the robustness of the findings.\u0000\u0000\u0000Originality/value\u0000Prior research indicates that corporate dividend payouts enhance a firm’s reputation by reducing information asymmetry and providing a positive signal to investors regarding future financial performance. This study provides valuable evidence that dividend payout can be used as a channel for image restoration by firms with lost reputations because of financial restatement.\u0000","PeriodicalId":229587,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting & Information Management","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131462904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：