Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease最新文献

Background: Extensive surgical resection of the thoracic aorta in patients with type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is thought to reduce the risk of late aortic wall degeneration and the need for repeat aortic operations.

Objectives: We evaluated the early and late outcomes after aortic root replacement and supracoronary ascending aortic replacement in patients with TAAD involving the aortic root.

Design: Retrospective, multicenter cohort study.

Methods: The outcomes after aortic root replacement and supracoronary ascending aortic replacement in patients with TAAD involving the aortic root, that is dissection flap located at least in one of the Valsava segments, were herein evaluated. In-hospital mortality, neurological complications, dialysis as well as 10-year repeat proximal aortic operation, and mortality were the outcomes of this study.

Results: Supracoronary ascending aortic replacement was performed in 198 patients and aortic root replacement in 215 patients. During a mean follow-up of 4.0 ± 4.0 years, 19 patients underwent 22 repeat procedures on the aortic root and/or aortic valve. No operative death occurred after these reinterventions. The risk of proximal aortic reoperation was significantly lower in patients who underwent aortic root replacement (5.5% vs 12.9%, adjusted subdistributional hazard ratio (SHR) 0.085, 95% CI 0.022-0.329). Aortic root replacement was associated with higher rates of in-hospital (14.4% vs 12.1%, adjusted odds ratio 2.192, 95% CI 1.000-4.807) and 10-year mortality (44.5% vs 30.4%, adjusted hazard ratio 2.216, 95% CI 1.338-3.671). Postoperative neurological complications and dialysis rates were comparable in the study groups.

Conclusion: Among patients with TAAD involving the aortic root, its replacement was associated with a significantly lower rate of repeat proximal aortic operation of any type compared to supracoronary aortic replacement. Still, aortic root replacement seems to be associated with an increased risk of mortality in these patients.

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04831073 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04831073).

Background: Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (hATTR) is caused by mutations in the transthyretin (TTR) gene, which lead to the aggregation of misfolded TTR protein and amyloid accumulation in the peripheral nerves, heart, and gastrointestinal tract. Recently, RNA therapeutics, including small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), have been approved for treating patients with hATTR.

Objectives: To assess the neurological efficacy and safety of RNA therapeutics in hATTR patients.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources and methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to August 14, 2024. Outcomes included changes from baseline in the Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) score and the modified Neuropathy Impairment Score +7 (mNIS + 7), modified body mass index (mBMI), adverse effects, serious adverse events, and all-cause mortality.

Results: Our study included four RCTs with 842 patients (568 in the RNA therapeutics group and 274 in the placebo group). RNA therapeutics significantly improved Norfolk QoL-DN (mean difference (MD), -18.79; 95% CI, -22.32 to -15.25; p < 0.00001; I² = 28%) and mNIS + 7 scores (MD, -26.90; 95% CI, -31.67 to -22.13; p < 0.00001; I² = 61%), with significant preservation of mBMI (MD, 114.98; 95% CI, 90.64-139.32; p < 0.00001; I² = 59%) compared to placebo. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the risk of adverse effects (risk ratio (RR), 0.89; 95% CI, 0.69-1.15; p = 0.36; I² = 34%), serious adverse effects (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.31-1.58; p = 0.39; I² = 20%), and all-cause mortality (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.31 to 1.58; p = 0.39; I² = 20%).

Conclusion: RNA therapeutics are effective and well-tolerated in patients with hATTR, significantly improving quality of life and the progression of neurological impairment. siRNAs demonstrate better outcomes compared to ASOs.

Trial registration: PROSPERO (CRD42024568346).

Misplacement of pericardiocentesis catheter in central veins is a rare complication that can be managed with several methods. In this case, we report a percutaneous image-guided plug-assisted management of a misplaced pericardiocentesis catheter into the inferior vena cava through a transhepatic tract successfully occluded. This minimally invasive technique was not previously described in this setting and had a favorable long-term outcome.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of calcified coronary arteries is associated with poor outcomes. Poorly modified calcified lesion hinders the stent delivery, disrupts drug-carrying polymer, impairs drug elution kinetics and results in under-expanded stent (UES). UES is the most common cause of acute stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis after PCI of calcified lesions. Angiography has poor sensitivity for recognition and quantification of coronary calcium, thereby mandating the use of intravascular imaging. Intravascular imaging, like intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography, has the potential to accurately identify and quantify the coronary calcium and to guide appropriate modification device before stent placement. Available options for the modification of calcified plaque include modified balloons (cutting balloon, scoring balloon and high-pressure balloon), atherectomy devices (rotational atherectomy and orbital atherectomy) and laser atherectomy. Coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is the newest addition to the tool box for calcified plaque modification. It produces the acoustic shockwaves, which interact with the coronary calcium to cause multiplanar fractures. These calcium fractures increase the vessel compliance and result in desirable minimum stent areas. Coronary IVL has established its safety and efficacy for calcified lesion in series of Disrupt CAD trials. Its advantages over atherectomy devices include ease of use on workhorse wire, ability to modify deep calcium, no debris embolization causing slow flow or no-flow and minimal thermal injury. It is showing promising results in modification of difficult calcified lesion subsets such as calcified nodule, calcified left main bifurcation lesions and chronic total occlusion. In this review, authors will summarize the mechanism of action for IVL, its role in contemporary practice, evidence available for its use, its advantages over atherectomy devices and its imaging insight in different calcified lesion scenarios.

Despite the significant increase in women in academic medicine over the last 50 years, women are still under-represented in leadership positions in academia. However, there is a lack of data on the diversity of editorial boards in Middle Eastern medical journals. So, we aim to portray the diversity of editorial boards of Iraqi medical journals by conducting a cross-sectional analysis of the editorial boards' members of all Iraqi medical journals. Gender, affiliation and specialty were extracted from the journals' websites and/or from the professional profiles of the editorial board members. Twenty-five journals and 446 editorial board members were analysed. More than half of editorial board members specialized in basic science, while 39.76% specialized in clinical specialties. Approximately, 20.18% of editorial board members (regardless their role) were women. Four percent of editor-in-chief were women. There were significant differences in editorial role according to gender (p < 0.0001), yet residency (p = 0.688) and specialty (p = 0.190) did not differ according to their gender. Most editorial board members were affiliated with Baghdad. So, we can conclude that there is a significant under-representation of women across all roles on the editorial board of medical journals especially in the leading positions. All stakeholders, publishers, authors and academics should commit to ensure the diversity of editorial boards.

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a noninvasive imaging modality of cardiac structures and vasculature considered comparable to invasive coronary angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD) in several major cardiovascular guidelines. Conventional image acquisition, processing, and analysis of CCTA imaging have progressed significantly in the past decade through advances in technology, computation, and engineering. However, the advent of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven analysis of CCTA further drives past the limitations of conventional CCTA, allowing for greater achievements in speed, consistency, accuracy, and safety. AI-driven CCTA (AI-CCTA) has achieved a significant reduction in radiation exposure for patients, allowing for high-quality scans with sub-millisievert radiation doses. AI-CCTA has demonstrated comparable accuracy and consistency in manual coronary artery calcium scoring against expert human readers. An advantage over invasive coronary angiography, which provides luminal information only, CCTA allows for plaque characterization, providing detailed information on the quality of plaque and offering further prognosticative value for the management of CAD. Combined with AI, many recent studies demonstrate the efficacy, accuracy, efficiency, and precision of AI-driven analysis of CCTA imaging for the evaluation of CAD, including assessing degree stenosis, adverse plaque characteristics, and CT fractional flow reserve. The limitations of AI-CCTA include its early phase in investigation, the need for further improvements in AI modeling, possible medicolegal implications, and the need for further large-scale validation studies. Despite these limitations, AI-CCTA represents an important opportunity for improving cardiovascular care in an increasingly advanced and data-driven world of modern medicine.

Background: The no-reflow (NRF) phenomenon is the "Achilles heel" of interventionists after performing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). No definitive treatment has been proposed for NRF, and preventive strategies are central to improving care for patients who develop NRF.

Objectives: In this study, we aim to investigate the clinical prediction models developed to predict NRF in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.

Design: Systematic review.

Data sources and methods: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were observed. Studies that developed clinical prediction modeling for NRF after primary PCI in STEMI patients were included. Data extraction was performed using the Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modeling Studies (CHARMS) checklist. The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) tool was used for critical appraisal of the included studies.

Results: The three most common predictors were age, total ischemic time, and preoperative thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade. Most of the included studies internally validated their developed model via various methods: random split, bootstrapping, and cross-validation. Only three studies (18%) externally validated their model. Six studies (37%) reported a calibration plot with or without the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. The reported area under the curve ranged from 0.648 to 0.925. The most common biases were in the statistical domain.

Conclusion: Clinical prediction models aid in individualizing care for STEMI patients with NRF after primary PCI. Of the 16 included studies, we report four to have a low risk of bias and low concern with regard to our research question, which should undergo external validation with or without updating in future studies.

Background: Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a common hyperlipidaemic condition with strong genetic predisposition and is independently associated with ischaemic heart disease (IHD). A Mendelian randomisation study has suggested that elevated Lp(a) is likely to confer similar causal risks as heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia for premature IHD. We aimed to characterise the clinical profiles of admitted patients with IHD with at least one Lp(a) measurement. We also investigated whether elevated Lp(a) concentration was associated with premature onset of IHD.

Methods: This is a descriptive, non-interventional, retrospective study with data from a single tertiary hospital IHD Lp(a) cohort in Singapore, which consecutively recruited 521 patients with IHD admitted to the hospital.

Results: A total of 82.2% were men, 46.6% had newly diagnosed IHD and 10% had premature IHD. The median Lp(a) levels was 35.2 nmol/L. 70.8% of patients had normal Lp(a) concentrations (<70 nmol/L), 13.4% of people with Lp(a) ⩾ 70 to <120 nmol/L and 15.7% of patients with Lp(a) ⩾ 120 nmol/L. Lp(a) distribution was positively skewed to the right for all ethnicities. Patients of Indian ethnicity and of female gender had higher levels of Lp(a) compared with other ethnicities and gender, respectively. Multivariable regression analysis identified Lp(a) ⩾ 155 mmol/L to be associated with development of premature IHD (OR = 2.90, 95% CI: 1.26-6.67, p = 0.012).

Conclusion: There exist differences in Lp(a) distribution across ethnicities and gender. The subgroup analysis suggests that Lp(a) ⩾ 155 mmol/L was associated with premature onset of IHD.