Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease最新文献

Background and objectives: California is one of a few states with mandatory reporting of mortality after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. The Affordable Care Act restructured Medicaid, preferentially penalizing patients experiencing poverty because payments to hospitals for isolated surgical events overshadow payments to primary care clinicians. We propose outcomes are superior when hospital networks organize surgical episodes within the context of primary care inside that same network.

Design and methods: We listed factors impacting outcomes after CABG. CABG surgery outcome depends upon the integration of issues beginning years preoperatively and extending for decades. Therefore, we studied one health maintenance organization (HMO) from 2009 to 2020 compared to surrounding individual hospitals. We divided 58 hospitals in Northern California in 2009 according to income and population. To focus on changes introduced because of COVID-19, we compared a public database for the subset in 2009 for any relationship between poverty in a zip code and low volumes of CABG in that area to overall mortality in 2020. First, we defined low-income zip codes as those with a higher rate of poverty than the state average or with a lower per capita average income, per Census Bureau. Second, low volume was defined as a population under 165,000 because a hospital adjacent to a larger community can easily transfer care, sharing surgeons and processes. Third, we defined low volume as fewer than 180 CABG per year.

Results: Our qualitative evidence synthesis reveals that informal communication and hospital HMO policies improve CABG outcomes. In our small pilot data, Chi-square analysis showed higher crude mortality rates in 1507 CABG in 17 low-income low-volume hospitals versus 8163 CABG in the other 41 Northern California hospitals (2.72% vs 1.69%, p = 0.0064). Low-income low-volume hospitals had a relative mortality risk of 1.61 (95% CI: 1.14-2.27). These hospitals had a mean mortality rate of 3.79%, readmission 11.12%, and stroke 1.84%. A patient undergoing CABG in a low-income low-volume hospital has a 61% higher chance of dying. The number needed to treat analysis shows that one life can potentially be saved for every 97 patients referred to another institution.

Conclusion: We describe features of an HMO that contribute to up to fourfold lower mortality rates.

Objective: We aim to evaluate the quality of patient-reported outcomes included in randomized control trials for the treatment of congestive heart failure using the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) checklist, a validated tool for critically appraising the quality of patient-reported outcomes.

Design: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 65 randomized control trials with patient-reported outcomes for drug intervention trials for treating congestive heart failure.

Setting: N/A.

Participants: N/A.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome of this study was to evaluate the reporting completeness of patient-reported outcomes in congestive heart failure clinical trials with drug interventions according to the ISOQOL checklist.

Results: Our search returned 1114 studies, of which, 65 are included in the analysis. The average completion of the ISOQOL reporting standards was 44.51%. Higher completion of the ISOQOL patient-reported outcome standards was observed in the clinical trials with patient-reported outcomes as primary endpoints compared to the clinical trials with patient-reported outcomes as a secondary endpoint. The multivariable regression model showed that clinical trials with patient-reported outcomes as a primary endpoint had a 21.46% better completion percentage (t = 4.45, p ⩽ 0.001) when controlling for PRO recording duration and trial registration. Eight (8/65, 12.31%) of the clinical trials met the satisfaction criteria of completing two-thirds of the ISOQOL patient-reported outcomes reporting standards. All of these RCTs had a patient-reported outcome as a primary endpoint.

Conclusion: Our analysis of the reporting of patient-reported outcomes in congestive heart failure clinical trials with drug interventions suggests that the quality of reporting is suboptimal. This evidence of substandard reporting of patient-reported outcomes is disconcerting as it reduces the transparency of randomized control trials, which are considered the foundation of evidenced-based medicine. Inadequate reporting may result in clinicians implementing misrepresented or incomplete evidence into clinical practice. Validated reporting tools, such as the ISOQOL, can be used by trialists and clinicians alike to improve and critically appraise the reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized control trials.

Trial registration: N/A.

Background: Sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) is a cornerstone treatment for heart failure (HF). Beneficial effects on hospitalization rates, mortality, and left ventricular remodeling have been observed in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Despite the positive results, the influence of S/V on renal function during long-term follow-up has received little attention.

Aims: We investigated the long-term effects of S/V therapy on renal function in a large cohort of patients with HFrEF. Additionally, we examined the effects of the drug in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) compared to those with preserved renal function and identified primary risk characteristics.

Methods: We studied 776 outpatients with HFrEF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% from an observational registry of the Italian Society of Cardiology, all receiving optimized standard-of-care therapy with S/V. The patients were included in a multicentric open-label registry from 11 Italian academic hospitals. Kidney function was evaluated at baseline, after 6 months of S/V, and at 4 years. Patients were followed-up through periodic clinical visits.

Results: During a 48-month follow-up period, 591 patients remained stable and 185 patients (24%) experienced adverse events (85 deaths and 126 hospitalizations). S/V therapy marginally affects renal function during the follow-up period (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline 72.01 vs eGFR at follow-up 70.38 ml/min/m², p = 0.01; and creatinine was 1.06 at baseline vs 1.10 at follow-up, p < 0.04). Among patients who maintained preserved renal function, 35% were in Dose 3 and 10% dropped out of S/V therapy (p < 0.006). Univariate analysis showed that Drop-out of S/V (HR 2.73 [2.01, 3.71], p < 0.001), history of previous HF hospitalization (HR 1.75 [1.30, 2.36], p < 0.001), advanced NYHA class (HR 2.14 [1.60, 2.86], p < 0.001), NT-proBNP values >1000 pg/ml (HR 1.95[1.38, 2.77], p < 0.001), furosemide dose >50 mg (HR 2.04 [1.48, 2.82], p < 0.001), and creatinine values >1.5 mg/dl occurred during follow-up (HR 1.74 [1.24, 2.43], p < 0.001) were linked to increased risk. At multivariable analysis, increased doses of loop diuretics, advanced NYHA class, creatinine >1.5 mg/dl, and atrial fibrillation were independent predictors of adverse events.

Conclusion: Long-term S/V therapy is associated with improved outcomes and renal protection in patients with HFrEF. This effect is more pronounced in patients who tolerate escalating doses. The positive effects of the drug are maintained in both CKD and preserved renal function. Future research may study the safety and underlying causes of current protection.

Infective endocarditis (IE) is an increasingly recognized condition with high morbidity. Patients with atypical symptoms, culture-negative infections, and prosthetic cardiac devices and implants represent challenging populations to evaluate and manage. Recent major society guidelines have recommended the appropriate incorporation of multimodality imaging in the evaluation of these more complex IE cases. This article draws on the available literature regarding the different cardiac imaging modalities and discusses the role of multimodality imaging in IE.

Background: Although guidelines recommend intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) and ergonovine (ER) provocation testing for diagnosis of vasospastic angina, the feasibility and safety of sequential (combined) use of both pharmacological agents during the same catheterization session remain unclear.

Objectives: In this study, we investigated the feasibility and safety of sequential intracoronary ACh and ER administration for coronary spasm provocation testing.

Methods: The study included 235 patients who showed positive results on ACh and ER provocation testing. Initial intracoronary ACh administration was followed by ER administration for left coronary artery (LCA) spasm provocation testing. Subsequently, the right coronary artery (RCA) was subjected to sequential ACh and ER administration for provocation testing. The primary outcome of the study was the safety of sequential intracoronary ACh and ER provocation testing, which was assessed based on a composite of all-cause death, sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation, and cardiogenic shock.

Results: Even in patients with negative results on sequential intracoronary ACh and ER provocation testing in the LCA and only ACh administration into the RCA, additional administration of ER into the RCA showed a positive provocation test result in 33 of 235 (14.0%) patients; three (1.3%) patients developed adverse effects (cardiogenic shock occurred in all cases) during LCA provocation testing. We observed no deaths attributable to spasm provocation testing.

Conclusion: Sequential administration of intracoronary ACh and ER was associated with a relatively low major complication rate and may be safe and potentially useful for diagnosis of vasospastic angina.

Background: Inflammation has been suggested to play a role in heart failure (HF) pathogenesis. However, the role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), as a novel biomarker, to assess HF prognosis needs to be investigated. We sought to evaluate the impact of PLR on HF clinical outcomes.

Methods: English-published records in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web-of-science databases were screened until December 2023. Relevant articles evaluated PLR with clinical outcomes (including mortality, rehospitalization, HF worsening, and HF detection) were recruited, with PLR difference analysis based on death/survival status in total and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients.

Results: In total, 21 articles (n = 13,924) were selected. The total mean age was 70.36 ± 12.88 years (males: 61.72%). Mean PLR was 165.54 [95% confidence interval (CI): 154.69-176.38]. In total, 18 articles (n = 10,084) reported mortality [either follow-up (PLR: 162.55, 95% CI: 149.35-175.75) or in-hospital (PLR: 192.83, 95% CI: 150.06-235.61) death rate] and the mean PLR was 166.68 (95% CI: 154.87-178.50). Further analysis revealed PLR was significantly lower in survived HF patients rather than deceased group (152.34, 95% CI: 134.01-170.68 versus 194.73, 95% CI: 175.60-213.85, standard mean difference: -0.592, 95% CI: -0.857 to -0.326, p < 0.001). A similar trend was observed for HFrEF patients. PLR failed to show any association with mortality risk (hazard ratio: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.99-1.05, p = 0.289). Analysis of other aforementioned outcomes was not possible due to the presence of few studies of interest.

Conclusion: PLR should be used with caution for prognosis assessment in HF sufferers and other studies are necessary to explore the exact association.

Background: Determinants of coronary artery disease, such as endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress, could be attenuated by high-intensity aerobic interval exercise training (HIIT). However, the volume of this type of training is not well established.

Objective: To assess the impact of two volumes of HIIT, low (LV-HIIT, <10 min at high intensity) and high (HV-HIIT, >10 min at high intensity), on vascular-endothelial function in individuals after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Materials and methods: Clinical trial in 80 AMI patients (58.4 ± 8.3 years, 82.5% men) with three study groups: LV-HIIT (n = 28) and HV-HIIT (n = 28) with two sessions per week for 16 weeks and control group (CG, n = 24) with unsupervised physical activity recommendations. Endothelial function (brachial flow-mediated dilation, FMD), atherosclerosis (carotid intima-media thickness ultrasound, cIMT), and levels of oxidized low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) as a marker of oxidative stress were determined before and after the intervention period.

Results: After the intervention, in the exercise groups, there was an increase in FMD (LV-HIIT, ↑58.8%; HV-HIIT, ↑94.1%; p < 0.001) concurrently with a decrease in cIMT (LV-HIIT, ↓3.0%; HV-HIIT, ↓3.2%; p = 0.019) and LDLox (LV-HIIT, ↓5.2%; HV-HIIT, ↓8.9%; p < 0.001), with no significant changes in the CG. Furthermore, a significant inverse correlation was observed between ox-LDL and endothelial function related to the volume of HIIT training performed (LV-HIIT: r = -0.376, p = 0.031; HV-HIIT: r = -0.490, p < 0.004), with no significance in the CG (r = 0.021, p = 0.924).

Conclusion: In post-AMI patients, HIIT may lead to a volume-dependent enhancement in endothelial function, attributed to a decrease in oxidative stress, with added beneficial effects in reducing vascular wall thickness. An LV-HIIT program, with less than 10 min at high intensity per session, has proven enough efficiency to initiate favorable vascular-endothelial adaptations, potentially reducing cardiovascular risk among patients with coronary artery disease.

Trial registration: INTERFARCT, ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02876952.

Background: The prevalence of heart failure (HF) is increasing among young adults in the United States with pervasive racial and ethnic differences in this population.

Objective: To evaluate contemporary associations between race and ethnicity, clinical comorbidities, and outcomes among young to middle-aged adults with HF.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. All participants with a self-report of HF aged 20-64 years from 2005 to 2018 were included and stratified by race and ethnicity [non-Hispanic (NH) Whites, NH Blacks, and Hispanics]. Data on baseline characteristics including age, sex, marital status, citizenship, education level, body mass index, insurance, waist circumference, cigarette smoking, marijuana use, and relevant clinical comorbidities were included. Weighted logistic regression was performed to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) to determine the association of race and ethnicity with HF. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to assess the association of race and ethnicity with all-cause and cardiac mortality.

Results: A total of 1,940,447 young to middle-aged adults had self-reported HF between 2005 and 2018, of whom 61% were NH White, 40% were NH Black, and 22% were Hispanic. When compared with NH White adults, NH Black adults had higher odds of HF adjusted for age, sex, insurance status, marital status, education level, citizenship status, and clinical comorbidities (adjusted aOR 2.63, 95% CI: 1.71-4.05, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the odds of HF between Hispanic and NH White adults (aOR 1.18, 95% CI: 0.64-2.18, p = 0.585). NH Black adults had higher mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and a comparable or lower burden of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular clinical comorbidities compared with NH White and Hispanic adults. No statistical significance was noted by race and ethnicity for all-cause and cardiac mortality during a follow-up of 5 years.

Conclusion: NH Black young to middle-aged adults were more likely to have HF which may be related to higher blood pressure given the largely similar burden of clinically relevant comorbidities compared with other racial and ethnic groups.

Background: Currently, no pharmacological or device-based intervention has been fully proven to reverse the no-reflow phenomenon.

Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of intracoronary (IC) epinephrine in the management of no-reflow phenomenon following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), either as first-line treatment or after the failure of conventional agents.

Design: Systematic review.

Data sources and methods: PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched up to 28 May 2022, with additional manual search on the Google Scholar and review of the reference lists of the relevant studies to identify all published studies. Cohort studies, case series, and interventional studies written in English which evaluated the efficacy and safety of IC epinephrine in patients with no-flow phenomenon were included in our review.

Results: Six of the 646 articles identified in the initial search met our inclusion criteria. IC epinephrine was used either as a first-line treatment [two randomized clinical trials (RCTs)] or after the failure of conventional agents (two cohort studies and two case series) for restoring the coronary flow, mainly after primary PCI. As first-line therapy, IC epinephrine successfully restored coronary flow in over 90% of patients in both RCTs, which significantly outperformed IC adenosine (78%) but lagged behind combination of verapamil and tirofiban (100%) in this regard. In the refractory no-flow phenomenon, successful reperfusion [thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade = 3] was achieved in three out of four patients after the administration of IC epinephrine based on the results from both case series. Their findings were confirmed by a recent cohort study that further compared IC epinephrine with IC adenosine and found significant differences between them in terms of efficacy [% TIMI flow grade 3: (69.1% versus 52.7%, respectively; p value = 0.04)] and 1-year major adverse cardiac event (MACE) outcomes (11.3% versus 26.7%, respectively; p value ⩽ 0.01). Overall, malignant ventricular arrhythmias were reported in none of the patients treated with IC epinephrine.

Conclusion: Results from available evidence suggest that IC epinephrine might be an effective and safe agent in managing the no-reflow phenomenon.

Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) is characterized by structural and functional abnormalities in the myocardium affecting people with diabetes. Treatment of DCM focuses on glucose control, blood pressure management, lipid-lowering, and lifestyle changes. Due to limited therapeutic options, DCM remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes, thus emphasizing the need to develop new therapeutic strategies. Ongoing research is aimed at understanding the underlying molecular mechanism(s) involved in the development and progression of DCM, including oxidative stress, inflammation, and metabolic dysregulation. The goal is to develope innovative pharmaceutical therapeutics, offering significant improvements in the clinical management of DCM. Some of these approaches include the effective targeting of impaired insulin signaling, cardiac stiffness, glucotoxicity, lipotoxicity, inflammation, oxidative stress, cardiac hypertrophy, and fibrosis. This review focuses on the latest developments in understanding the underlying causes of DCM and the therapeutic landscape of DCM treatment.